Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:31:17.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - In ovo RNAi opens new possibilities for functional genomics in vertebrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2009

Dimitris Bourikas
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Institute of Zoology
Thomas Baeriswyl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Institute of Zoology
Rejina Sadhu
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Institute of Zoology
Esther T. Stoeckli
Affiliation:
University of Zurich, Institute of Zoology
Krishnarao Appasani
Affiliation:
GeneExpression Systems, Inc., Massachusetts
Andrew Fire
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The development of high-throughput methods has changed the way genes are analyzed. In the past, a spontaneous or targeted mutation was a prerequisite for the identification of a gene and its function. Today, genome-sequencing projects and large-scale screens provide a tremendous amount of information about the genetic make-up of an organism. Unfortunately, the long lists of genes expressed in specific tissues or distinct phases of an organism's life provide little or no information about the function of the expressed proteins. Functional gene analysis remains a time-consuming and challenging step that requires changes in gene expression in the context of a living organism. Therefore, the availability of suitable model systems is key to our progress in understanding the role of genes in biological processes. Model systems need to be easily accessible and efficient in producing functional read-outs of gene manipulation. Due to constraints in time and money these criteria were met only by invertebrate animal models, such as Drosophila and C. elegans (Adams and Sekelsky, 2002; St. Johnston, 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Simmer et al., 2003). For many studies, however, vertebrate model systems are required. The mouse has been the most widely used vertebrate model system, because technologies for genetic manipulations based on homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells are available and allow for selected inactivation of target genes (Porter, 1998; Müller, 1999; Jackson, 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
RNA Interference Technology
From Basic Science to Drug Development
, pp. 220 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. D. and Sekelsky, J. J., (2002). From sequence to phenotype: Reverse genetics in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 189–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, E. J. and Brickell, P. M. (1997). Replication-competent retroviral vectors for expressing genes in avian cells in vitro and in vivo. Molecular Biotechnology, 7, 289–298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, P. E., Sanz-Ezquerro, J., Overton, I. M., Burt, D. W., Bosch, E., Fong, W. T., Tickle, C., Brown, W. R. A., Wilson, S. A. and Hubbard, S. J. (2002). A comprehensive collection of chicken cDNAs. Current Biology, 12, 1965–1969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourikas, D. and Stoeckli, E. T. (2003). New tools for gene manipulation in chicken embryos. Oligonucleotides, 13, 411–419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronner-Fraser, M. (1996). Methods in avian embryology. In Methods in cell biology (ed. M. Bronner-Fraser), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
Brown, W. R. A., Hubbard, S. J., Tickle, C. and Wilson, S. A. (2003). The chicken as a model for large-scale analysis of vertebrates gene function. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 87–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstyn-Cohen, T.Tzarfaty, V., Frumkin, A., Feinstein, Y., Stoeckli, E. T. and Klar, A. (1999). F-spondin is required for accurate pathfinding of commissural axons at the floor plate. Neuron, 23, 233–246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, D. and Pourquie, O. (2003). Genetics. Chicken genome – science nuggets to come soon. Science, 300, 1669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cepko, C. (1988). Retrovirus vectors and their applications in neurobiology. Neuron, 1, 345–353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C. and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1998). Cell fate determination in embryonic ectoderm. Journal of Neurobiology, 36, 128–1513.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Driever, W. (1995). Axis formation in zebrafish. Current Opinions in Genetics and Development, 5, 610–618CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dynes, J. L. and Ngai, J. (1998). Pathfinding of olfactory neuron axons to stereotyped glomerular targets revealed by dynamic imaging in living zebrafish embryos. Neuron, 20, 1081–1091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fekete, D. M. and Cepko, C. L. (1993). Replication-competent retroviral vectors encoding alkaline phosphatase reveal spatial restriction of viral gene expression/transduction in the chick embryo. Molecular Cell Biology, 13, 2604–2613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finley, K. R., Davidson, A. E. and Ekker, S. C. (2001). Three-color imaging using fluorescent proteins in living zebrafish embryos. BioTechniques, 31, 66–70Google ScholarPubMed
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E. and Mello, C. C. (1998). Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391, 806–811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzli, D., Stoeckli, E. T., Kunz, S., Siribour, K., Rader, C., Kunz, B., Kozlov, S. V., Buchstaller, A., Lane, R. P., Suter, D. M., Dreyer, W. J. and Sonderegger, P. (2000). A direct interaction of axonin-1 with NgCAM-related cell adhesion molecule (NgCAM) results in guidance, but not growth of commissural axons. Journal of Cell Biology, 149, 951–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heasman, J. (2002). Morpholino oligos: Making sense of antisense?Developmental Biology, 243, 209–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, D. F., Morrison, C., Ruchaud, S. and Earnshaw, W. C. (2002). Reverse genetics of essential genes in tissue-culture cells: ‘Dead cells talking.’Trends in Cell Biology, 12, 281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itasaki, N., Bel-Vialar, S. and Krumlauf, R. (1999). ‘Shocking’ developments in chick embryology: Electroporation and in ovo gene expression. Nature Cell Biology, 1, E203–207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, I. J. (2001). Mouse mutagenesis on target. Nature Genetics, 28, 198–200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jontes, J. D., Buchanan, J. and Smith, S. J (2000). Growth cone and dendrite dynamics in zebrafish embryos: Early events in synaptogenesis imaged in vivo. Nature Neurosciences, 3, 231–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlstrom, R. O., Trowe, T. and Bonhoeffer, F. (1997). Genetic analysis of axon guidance and mapping in the zebrafish. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 3–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennerdell, J. R. and Carthew, R. W. (1998). Use of dsRNA-mediated genetic interference to demonstrate that frizzled and frizzled 2 act in the wingless pathway. Cell, 95, 1017–1026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebedeva, I. and Stein, C. A. (2001). Antisense oligonucleotides: Promise and reality. Annual Reviews of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 41, 403–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douarin, N. M. (1973). A Feulgen-positive nucleolus. Experimental Cell Research, 77, 459–468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douarin, N. M. and Teillet, M. A. (1973). The migration of neural crest cells to the wall of the digestive tract in avian embryo. Journal of Embryology & Experimental Morphology, 30, 31–48Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. S., Lee, R. Y., Fraser, A. G., Kamath, R. S., Ahringer, J. and Ruvkun, G. (2003). A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nature Genetics, 33, 40–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lievre, C. S. and Dourain, N. M. (1975). Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: Analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. Journal of Embryology & Experimental Morphology, 341, 25–54Google Scholar
Li, Y.-X., Farrell, M. J., Liu, R., Mohanty, N. and Kirby, M. L. (2000). Double-stranded RNA injection produces null phenotypes in zebrafish. Developmental Biology, 217, 394–405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, M. and Tabin, C. (1998). Targeted gene misexpression in chick limb buds using avian replication-competent retroviruses. Methods, 14, 407–420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, A. V. and Pablo, F. (1998). Inhibition of gene expression by antisense oligonucleotides in chick embryos in vitro and in vivo. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 36, 37–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, B. A. and Fekete, D. M. (1996). Manipulating gene expression with replication-competent retroviruses. Methods in Cell Biology, 51, 185–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, U. (1999). Ten years of gene targeting: Targeted mouse mutants, from vector design to phenotype analysis. Mechanisms in Development, 82: 3–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muramatsu, T., Mizutani, Y., Ohmori, Y. and Okumura, J. (1997). Comparison of three nonviral transfection methods for foreign gene expression in early chicken embryos in ovo. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 230, 376–380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasevicius, A. and Ekker, S. C. (2001). The zebrafish as a novel system for functional genomics and therapeutic development applications. Current Opinions in Molecular Therapy, 3, 224–228Google ScholarPubMed
Neuhauss, S. (2003). Behavioral genetic approaches to visual system development and function in zebrafish. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 148–160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oates, A. C., Bruce, A. E. E. and Ho, R. K. (2000). Too much interference: Injection of double-stranded RNA has nonspecific effects in the zebrafish embryo. Developmental Biology, 224, 20–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Malley, D. M., Zhou, Q. and Gahtan, E. (2003). Probing neural circuits in the zebrafish: A suite of optical techniques. Methods, 30, 49–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pekarik, V., Bourikas, D., Miglino, N., Joset, P., Preiswerk, S. and Stoeckli, E. T. (2003). Screening for gene function in chicken embryo using RNAi and electroporation. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 93–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, F. E. and Stoeckli, E. T. (2000). Use of lipophilic dyes in studies of axonal pathfinding in vivo. Microscopy Research Techniques, 48, 25–313.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, F. E., Rathjen, F. G. and Stoeckli, E. T. (2001). Distinct subpopulations of sensory afferents require F11 or axonin-1 for growth to their target layers within the spinal cord of the chick. Neuron, 30, 707–723CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petropoulos, C. J. and Hughes, S. H. (1991). Replication-competent retrovirus vectors for the transfer and expression of gene cassettes in avian cells. Journal of Virology, 65, 3728–3737Google ScholarPubMed
Porter, A. (1998). Controlling your losses: Conditional gene silencing in mammals. Trends in Genetics, 14, 73–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selleck, M. A. J. (1996). Culture and microsurgical manipulation of the early avian embryo. In Methods in avian embryology (ed. M. Bronner-Fraser), Academic Press, San Diego, CA.CrossRef
Simmer, F., Moorman, C., Linden, A. M., Kuijk, E., Berghe, P. V., Kamath, R., Fraser, A. G., Ahringer, J. and Plasterk, R. H. (2003). Genome-wide RNAi of C. elegans using the hypersensitive rrf-3 strain reveals novel gene function. PLoS Biology, 1, E12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D.St. (2002). The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 176–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckli, E. T. (2003). RNAi in avian embryos. In RNAi: A Guide to Gene Silencing. (ed. G. J. Hannon) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Stoeckli, E. T. and Landmesser, L. T. (1995). Axonin-1, Nr-CAM, and Ng-CAM play different roles in the in vivo guidance of chick commissural neurons. Neuron, 14, 1165–1179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoeckli, E. T. and Landmesser, L. T. (1998). Guidance at choice points. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 8, 73–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoeckli, E. T., Sonderegger, P., Pollerberg, G. E. and Landmesser, L. T. (1997). Interference with axonin-1 and NgCAM interactions unmasks a floor-plate activity inhibitory for commissural axons. Neuron, 18, 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerton, J. and Weller, D. (1997). Morpholino antisense oligomers: Design, preparation, and properties. Antisense Nucleic Acids & Drug Development, 7, 187–195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svoboda, P., Stein, P., Hayashi, H., and Schultz, R. M. (2000). Selective reduction of dormant maternal mRNAs in mouse oocytes by RNA interference. Development, 127, 4147–4156Google ScholarPubMed
Swartz, M., Eberhart, J., Mastick, G. S. and Krull, C. E. (2001). Sparking new frontiers: Using in vivo electroporation for genetic manipulations. Developmental Biology, 233, 13–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wargelius, A., Ellingsen, S. and Fjose, A. (1999). Double-stranded RNA induces specific developmental effects in zebrafish embryos. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications, 263, 156–161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wianny, F. and Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2000). Specific interference with gene function by double-stranded RNA in early mouse development. Nature Cell Biology, 2, 70–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, Z., Cao, Y., Li, M. and Meng, A. (2001). Double-stranded RNA injection produces nonspecific defects in zebrafish. Developmental Biology, 229, 215–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×