Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:10:58.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Four - Pleistocene rewilding: an enlightening thought experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

By
Johan T. du Toit
Edited by
Nathalie Pettorelli ,
Sarah M. Durant  and
Johan T. du Toit
Nathalie Pettorelli
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Sarah M. Durant
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Johan T. du Toit
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rewilding , pp. 55 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, E.S., Gill, J.L., Johnson, C.N., et al. (2016). Combining paleo-data and modern exclosure experiments to assess the impact of megafauna extinctions on woody vegetation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 847–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnosky, A.D., Lindsey, E.L., Villavicencio, N.A., et al. (2016). Variable impact of late-Quaternary megafaunal extinction in causing ecological state shifts in North and South America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 856–861.Google Scholar
Bates, L.A., Lee, P.C., Njiraini, N., et al. (2008). Do elephants show empathy? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15, 204–225.Google Scholar
Berger, K.M., Gese, E.M., and Berger, J. (2008). Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn. Ecology, 89, 818–828.Google Scholar
Bombaci, S., and Pejchar, L. (2016). Consequences of pinyon and juniper woodland reduction for wildlife in North America. Forest Ecology and Management, 365, 34–50.Google Scholar
Bowyer, R.T., Person, D.K., and Pierce, B.M. (2005). Detecting top-down versus bottom-up regulation of ungulates by large carnivores: implications for conservation and biodiversity. In Ray, J.C., Redford, K.H., Steneck, R.S., and Berger, J. (Eds.), Large carnivores and the conservation of biodiversity (pp. 342–361). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J.H., and Maurer, B.A. (1989). Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents. Science, 243, 1145–1150.Google Scholar
Bunney, K., Bond, W.J., and Henley, M. (2017). Seed dispersal kernel of the largest surviving megaherbivore – the African savanna elephant. Biotropica, 49, 395–401.Google Scholar
Caro, T. (2010). Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Chapin, F.S. III, Kofinas, G.P., and Folke, C. (Eds.) (2009). Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Côté, S.D., Rooney, T.P., Tremblay, J-P., Dussault, C., and Waller, D.M. (2004). Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 113–147.Google Scholar
Cromsigt, J.P.G.M., Kuijper, D.P.J., Adam, M., et al. (2013). Hunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DFC. (2010). The Oostvaardersplassen: beyond the horizon of the familiar. Driebergen, the Netherlands: Dutch Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Donlan, J., Greene, H.W., Berger, J., et al. (2005). Re-wilding North America. Nature, 436, 913–914.Google Scholar
Donlan, C.J., Berger, J., Bock, C.E., et al. (2006). Pleistocene rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation. The American Naturalist, 168, 660–681.Google Scholar
Doughty, C.E., Roman, J., Faurby, S., et al. (2016). Global nutrient transport in a world of giants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 868–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driessen, P.K. (2003). Eco-imperialism: green power, black death. Bellevue, WA: Free Enterprise Press.Google Scholar
du Toit, J.T. (2010). Considerations of scale in biodiversity conservation. Animal Conservation, 13, 229–236.Google Scholar
du Toit, J.T., and Cumming, D.H.M. (1999). Functional significance of ungulate diversity in African savannas and the ecological implications of the spread of pastoralism. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1643–1661.Google Scholar
du Toit, J.T., and Olff, H. (2014). Generalities in grazing and browsing ecology: using across-guild comparisons to control contingencies. Oecologia, 174, 1075–1083.Google Scholar
du Toit, J.T., and Owen-Smith, N. (1989). Body size, population metabolism, and habitat specialization among large African herbivores. The American Naturalist, 133, 736–740.Google Scholar
du Toit, J.T., Moe, S.R., and Skarpe, C. (2014). Elephant-mediated ecosystem processes in Kalahari-sand woodlands. In Skarpe, C., du Toit, J.T., and Moe, S.R. (Eds.), Elephants and savanna woodland ecosystems: a study from Chobe National Park, Botswana (pp. 30–39). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell and the Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
Fritz, H., and Duncan, P. (1994). On the carrying capacity for ungulates of African savanna ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 256, 77–82.Google Scholar
Fryxell, J.M., Metzger, K.L., Packer, C., Sinclair, A.R.E., and Mduma, S.A.R. (2015). Climate-induced effects on the Serengeti mammalian food web. In Sinclair, A.R.E., Metzger, K.L., Mduma, S.A.R., and Fryxell, J.M. (Eds.), Serengeti IV: sustaining biodiversity in a coupled human–natural system (pp. 175–191). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fulbright, T.E., Davies, K.W., and Archer, S.R. (2018). Wildlife responses to brush management: a contemporary evaluation. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 71, 35–44.Google Scholar
Gross, M.R., Coleman, R.M., and McDowall, R.M. (1988). Aquatic productivity and the evolution of diadromous fish migration. Science, 239, 1291–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N.G., Smith, F.E., and Slobodkin, L.B. (1960). Community structure, population control, and competition. The American Naturalist, 94, 421–425.Google Scholar
Hempson, G.H., Archibald, S., and Bond, W.J. (2015). A continent-wide assessment of the form and intensity of large mammal herbivory in Africa. Science, 350, 1056–1061.Google Scholar
ICMO2. (2010). Natural processes, animal welfare, moral aspects and management of the Oostvaardersplassen. Report of the second International Commission on Management of the Oostvaardersplassen (ICMO2). The Hague/ Wageningen: ICMO2.Google Scholar
Janzen, D.H., and Martin, P.S. (1982). Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science, 215, 19–27.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.N. (2002). Determinants of loss of large mammal species during the Late Quarternary ‘megafauna’ extinctions: life history and ecology, but not body size. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2221–2227.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P., and Marvier, M. (2012). What is conservation science? BioScience, 62, 962–969.Google Scholar
Kerley, G.I.H., and Landman, M. (2006). The impacts of elephants on biodiversity in the Eastern Cape subtropical thickets. South African Journal of Science, 102, 395–402.Google Scholar
Laundré, J.W., Hernández, L., and Altendorf, K.B. (2001). Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 1401–1409.Google Scholar
Lötter, H.P.P., Henley, M., Fakir, S., Pickover, M., and Ramose, M. (2008). Ethical considerations in elephant management. In Scholes, R.J. and Mennell, K.G. (Eds.), Elephant management: a scientific assessment for South Africa (pp. 406–445). Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Lundgren, E.J., Ramp, D., Ripple, W.J., and Wallach, A.D. (2018). Introduced megafauna are rewilding the Anthropocene. Ecography, 41, 857–866.Google Scholar
MacNulty, D.R., Stahler, D.R., Wyman, C.T., Ruprecht, J., and Smith, D.W. (2016). The challenge of understanding northern Yellowstone elk dynamics after wolf reintroduction. In Smith, D.W., Stahler, D.R., MacNulty, D.R., and Haas, S. (Eds.), Yellowstone science (pp. 25–33). Mammoth, WY: Yellowstone National Park.Google Scholar
Maichak, E.J., Scurlock, B.M., Rogerson, J.D., et al. (2009). Effects of management, behavior, and scavenging on risk of brucellosis transmission in elk of western Wyoming. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 45, 398–410.Google Scholar
Malhi, Y., Doughty, C.E., Galetti, M., Smith, F.A., Svenning, J.C., and Terborgh, J.W. (2016). Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 838–846.Google Scholar
Marris, E. (2009). Reflecting the past. Nature, 462, 30–32.Google Scholar
Marshall, K.N., Cooper, D.J., and Hobbs, N.T. (2014). Interactions among herbivory, climate, topography and plant age shape riparian willow dynamics in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA. Journal of Ecology, 102, 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, D.M. (2017). Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century. Restoration Ecology, 25, 668–673.Google Scholar
Martin, P.S. (1973). The discovery of America. Science, 179, 969–974.Google Scholar
McCauley, D.J., Dawson, T.E., Power, M.E., et al. (2015). Carbon stable isotopes suggest that hippopotamus-vectored nutrients subsidize aquatic consumers in an East African river. Ecosphere, 6(4), 52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00514.1Google Scholar
McCauley, D.J., Hardesty-Moore, M., Halpern, B.S., and Young, H.S. (2017). A mammoth undertaking: harnessing insight from functional ecology to shape de-extinction priority setting. Functional Ecology, 31, 1003–1011.Google Scholar
Mills, L.S., Soulé, M.E., and Doak, D.F. (1993). The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience, 43, 219–224.Google Scholar
Mills, M.G.L., and Funston, P.J. (2003). Large carnivores and savanna heterogeneity. In du Toit, J.T., Rogers, K.H., and Biggs, H.C. (Eds.), The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity (pp. 370–388). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. (1987). Pleistocene extinctions: the pivotal role of megaherbivores. Paleobiology, 13, 351–362.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, R.N. (1988). Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. (1989). Megafaunal extinctions: the conservation message from 11,000 years B.P. Conservation Biology, 3, 405–412.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N., and Ogutu, J. (2003). Rainfall influences on ungulate population dynamics. In du Toit, J.T., Rogers, K.H., and Biggs, H.C. (Eds.), The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity (pp. 310–331). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Holt, R.D., Hudson, P.J., Lafferty, K.D., and Dobson, A.P. (2003). Keeping the herds healthy and alert: implications of predator control for infectious disease. Ecology Letters, 6, 797–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettorelli, N., Barlow, J., Stephens, P.A., et al. (2018). Making rewilding fit for policy. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, 1114–1125.Google Scholar
Pires, M.M., Guimarães, P.R. Jr, Galetti, M., and Jordano, P. (2018). Pleistocene megafaunal extinctions and the functional loss of long-distance seed-dispersal services. Ecography, 41, 153–163.Google Scholar
Richmond, O.M.W., McEntee, J.P., Hijmans, R.J., and Brashares, J.S. (2010). Is the climate right for Pleistocene rewilding? Using species distribution models to extrapolate climatic suitability for mammals across continents. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12899. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012899Google Scholar
Ripple, W.J., and Beschta, R.L. (2012). Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Biological Conservation, 145, 205–213.Google Scholar
Ripple, W.J., Newsome, T.M., Wolf, C., et al. (2015). Collapse of the world’s largest herbivores. Science Advances, 1, e1400103. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400103Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.R., and Rubenstein, D.I. (2016). From Pleistocene to trophic rewilding: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E1.Google Scholar
Seddon, P.J., Griffiths, C.J., Soorae, P.S., and Armstrong, D.P. (2014). Reversing defaunation: restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345, 406–412.Google Scholar
Sekercioglu, C.H. (2006). Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 464–471.Google Scholar
Shapiro, B. (2016). How to clone a mammoth: the science of de-extinction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A.R.E., Mduma, S., and Brashares, J.S. (2003). Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system. Nature, 425, 288–290.Google Scholar
Soulé, M., and Noss, R. (1998). Rewilding and biodiversity: complimentary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth, 8, 18–28.Google Scholar
Soulé, M.E., and Terborgh, J. (Eds.) (1999). Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Subalusky, A.L., Dutton, C.L., Rosi, E.J., and Post, D.M. (2017). Annual mass drownings of the Serengeti wildebeest migration influence nutrient cycling and storage in the Mara River. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (early view, online).Google Scholar
Surovell, T.A., Pelton, S.R., Anderson-Precher, R., and Myers, A.D. (2016). Test of Martin’s overkill hypothesis using radiocarbon dates on extinct megafauna. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 886–891.Google Scholar
Svenning, J.C., Pedersen, P.B.M., Donlan, C.J., et al. (2016a). Time to move on from ideological debates on rewilding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E3.Google Scholar
Svenning, J.C., Pedersen, P.B.M., Donlan, C.J., et al. (2016b). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 898–906.Google Scholar
Tallian, A., Smith, D.W., Stahler, D.R., et al. (2017). Predator foraging response to a resurgent dangerous prey. Functional Ecology, 31, 1418–1429.Google Scholar
Tambling, C.J., and du Toit, J.T. (2005). Modeling wildebeest population dynamics: implications of predation and offtake in a closed system. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truett, J., and Phillips, M. (2009). Beyond historic baselines: restoring Bolson tortoises to Pleistocene range. Ecological Restoration, 27, 144–151.Google Scholar
van Aarde, R., Ferreira, S., Jackson, T., et al. (2008). Elephant population biology and ecology. In Scholes, R.J. and Mennell, K.G. (Eds.), Elephant management: a scientific assessment for South Africa (pp. 84–145). Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, B., Hayward, M.W., Ripple, W.J., Meloro, C., and Roth, V.L. (2016). The impact of large terrestrial carnivores on Pleistocene ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 862–867.Google Scholar
Wilmers, C.C., Crabtree, R.L., Smith, D.W., Murphy, K.M., and Getz, W.M. (2003). Trophic facilitation by introduced top predators: grey wolf subsidies to scavengers in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 909–916.Google Scholar
Young, H.S., McCauley, D.J., Galetti, M., and Dirzo, R. (2016). Patterns, causes and consequences of Anthropocene defaunation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 47, 333–358.Google Scholar
Zimov, S.A. (2005). Pleistocene Park: return of the mammoth’s ecosystem. Science, 308, 796–798.Google Scholar
Zimov, S.A., Zimov, N.S., Tikhonov, A.N., and Chapin, F.S. III. (2012). Mammoth steppe: a high productivity phenomenon. Quaternary Science Reviews, 57, 26–45.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×