Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Prince, Robert
and
Archer, Arlene
1970.
Exploring Academic Voice in Multimodal Quantitative Texts.
Literacy and Numeracy Studies,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Carter-Thomas, Shirley
and
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth
2003.
Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), A methodological overview of a multimodal genre.
ASp,
p.
59.
Gotti, Maurizio
2004.
Specialised Discourse in Multilingual and Multicultural Contexts.
ASp,
p.
5.
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda
2004.
Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: some insights from a comparative corpus-based study.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Hartley *, James
and
Fox, Claire
2004.
Assessing the mock viva: the experiences of British doctoral students.
Studies in Higher Education,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 6,
p.
727.
Anthony, L.
2005.
AntConc: design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom.
p.
729.
Tribble, Christopher
2005.
H.G. Widdowson, 2004, Text, Context, Pretext.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
415.
Swales, John M.
2006.
Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes.
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
p.
19.
Lassen, Inger
2006.
Is the press release a genre? A study of form and content.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
503.
de Oliveira, Janaina Minelli
and
Pagano, Adriana Silvina
2006.
The research article and the science popularization article: a probabilistic functional grammar perspective on direct discourse representation.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 5,
p.
627.
Boote, David N.
and
Beile, Penny
2006.
On “Literature Reviews of, and for, Educational Research”: A Response to the Critique by Joseph Maxwell.
Educational Researcher,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 9,
p.
32.
Anthony, L.
2006.
Developing a Freeware, Multiplatform Corpus Analysis Toolkit for the Technical Writing Classroom.
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 3,
p.
275.
Cronin, Blaise
and
Franks, Sara
2006.
Trading cultures: Resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article's paratext.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 14,
p.
1909.
Charles, Maggie
2006.
The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses.
Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
492.
Limberg, Holger
2007.
Discourse structure of academic talk in university office hour interactions.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 2,
p.
176.
López-Arroyo, Belén
and
Méndez-Cendón, Beatriz
2007.
Describing Phraseological Devices in Medical Abstracts: An English/Spanish Contrastive Analysis.
Meta,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 3,
p.
503.
Paltridge, Brian
2007.
International Handbook of English Language Teaching.
p.
931.
MacIntosh-Murray, Anu
2007.
Poster Presentations as a Genre in Knowledge Communication: A Case Study of Forms, Norms, and Values.
Science Communication,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
347.
Askehave, Inger
2007.
The impact of marketization on higher education genres — the international student prospectus as a case in point.
Discourse Studies,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 6,
p.
723.
Morris, Steven A.
and
Van der Veer Martens, Betsy
2008.
Mapping research specialties.
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
213.