Aalbers, Manuel B. ‘The Variegated Financialization of Housing’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41, no. 4 (1 July 2017): 542–54.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Frank, and Heinzerling, Lisa. Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing. The New Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Adam, Smith. The Wealth of Nations. Aegitas, 2016.Google Scholar

Adams, Suzi. Ricoeur and Castoriadis in Discussion: On Human Creation, Historical Novelty, and the Social Imaginary. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.Google Scholar

Aimaer, Karl, and Rodrik, Dani. ‘Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 20, no. 2 (6 January 2020): 189–207.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Andre, Thomas J., Jr. ‘Cultural Hegemony: The Exportation of Anglo-Saxon Corporate Governance Ideologies to Germany’. Tulane Law Review 73, no. 1 (1998): 104–16.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Atiyah, P. S. The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. Oxford University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augenstein, Daniel. ‘Integration through Law’ Revisited: The Making of the European Polity. Ashgate Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Balanyá, Belén. Europe Inc: Regional and Global Restructuring and the Rise of Corporate Power. Pluto Press (UK), 2000.Google Scholar

Barkhausen, Robin, Durand, Antoine, and Fick, Katharina. ‘Review and Analysis of Ecodesign Directive Implementing Measures: Product Regulations Shifting from Energy Efficiency towards a Circular Economy’. Sustainability 14, no. 16 (19 August 2022): 10318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John M. ‘Green Republicanism and a “Just Transition” from the Tyranny of Economic Growth’. In Green Politics and Civic Republicanism, edited by Dodsworth, Ashley and Honohan, Iseult, 59–76. Routledge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija. ‘The Affordability of Energy: How Much Protection for the Vulnerable Consumers?’ Journal of Consumer Policy 33, no. 3 (9 February 2010): 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija. ‘Contesting Austerity: On the Limits of EU Knowledge Governance’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (3 February 2017): 150–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija. ‘Hayek Upside-Down: On the Democratic Effects of Transnational Lists’. German Law Journal 21, no. 1 (1 January 2020): 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija. ‘Imaginaries of Progress as Constitutional Imaginaries’. In European Constitutional Imaginaries: Between Ideology and Utopia, edited by Komárek, Jan, 360–77. Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘Internal Market Rationality, Private Law and the Direction of the Union: Resuscitating the Market as the Object of the Political’, European Law Journal 21, no. 5 (15 January 2015), 572–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘Internal Market Rationality: In the Way of Re‐imagining the Future’. European Law Journal 24, no. 1 (1 January 2018): 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘Making Transnational Markets: The Institutional Politics behind the TTIP’. Europe and the World 1, no. 1 (1 June 2017): 1–37.Google Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘Regulatory Convergence through the Back Door: TTIP’s Regulatory Cooperation and the Future of Precaution in Europe’. German Law Journal 18, no. 4 (1 July 2017): 969–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘Towards the Imaginary of Collective Prosperity in the European Union (EU): Reorienting the Corporation’. European Law Open 1, no. 4 (2022): 957–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartl, Marija ‘The Way We Do Europe: Subsidiarity and the Substantive Democratic Deficit’. European Law Journal 21, no. 1 (1 January 2015): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartley, Tim. ‘Transnational Corporations and Global Governance’. Annual Review of Sociology 44, no. 1 (30 July 2018): 145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bedjaoui, Mohammed. Towards a New International Economic Order. Holmes & Meier, 1979.Google Scholar

Berman, Elizabeth Popp. Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy. Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Blokker, Paul. ‘The Imaginary Constitution of Constitutions’. Social Imaginaries 3, no. 1 (1 January 2017): 167–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blyth, Mark. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Boas, Ingrid, Farbotko, Carol, Adams, Helen, Sterly, Harald, Bush, Simon R., Van Der Geest, Kees, Wiegel, Hanne et al. ‘Climate Migration Myths’. Nature Climate Change 9, no. 12 (2019): 901–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogoeski, Vladimir. ‘The Aftermath of the Laval Quartet: Emancipating Labour (Law) from the Rationality of the Internal Market in the Field of Posting’. PhD diss., Hertie School, Berlin, 2021. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3717.Google Scholar

Bollier, David, and Helfrich, Silke. Free, Fair, and Alive: The Insurgent Power of the Commons. New Society Publishers, 2019.Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruna, Natacha. ‘A Climate-Smart World and the Rise of Green Extractivism’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 49, no. 4 (2022): 839–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruszt, László, and Vukov, Višnja. ‘Making States for the Single Market: European Integration and the Reshaping of Economic States in the Southern and Eastern Peripheries of Europe’. West European Politics 40, no. 4 (2017): 663–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bundgaard, Anja Marie, Mosgaard, Mette, and Remmen, Arne. ‘From Energy Efficiency towards Resource Efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive’. Journal of Cleaner Production 144 (1 February 2017): 358–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgers, Laura. ‘Private Rights of Nature’. Transnational Environmental Law 11, no. 3 (1 November 2022): 463–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, Michel. ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’. The Sociological Review 46, no. S1 (1 May 1998): 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvin, Katherine, Dasgupta, Dipak, Krinner, Gerhard, Mukherji, Aditi, Thorne, Peter, Trisos, Christopher H., Romero, José et al. ‘IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’. IPCC (25 July 2023): 1–34.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica, and Weiler, Joseph. Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience. De Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar

Caruso, Daniela. ‘Non-parties: The Negative Externalities of Regional Trade Agreements in a Private Law Perspective’. Harvard International Law Journal 59 (2018): 389–430.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius. The Imaginary Institution of Society. MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Chamorel, Patrick. ‘Macron versus the Yellow Vests’. Journal of Democracy 30, no. 4 (1 January 2019): 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandhoke, Neera. Democracy and Revolutionary Politics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. ‘The Corporate Takeover of U.S. Democracy’. Chomsky.info (24 January 2010). https://chomsky.info/20100124/.Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, Emilios. ‘Europe’s Donors and Its Supplicants: Reflections on the Greek Crisis’. In Constitutional Sovereignty and Social Solidarity in Europe, edited by ven der Walt, Johan and Ellsworth, Jeffrey, 241–66. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar

Christodoulidis, Emilios. The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law. Cambridge University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Closa, Carlos, Kochenov, Dimitry, and Weiler, Joseph H. H.. ‘Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union’. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, No. 2014/25 (2014).Google Scholar

Colgan, Jeff D., and Keohane, Robert O.. ‘The Liberal Order Is Rigged: Fix It Now or Watch It Wither’. Foreign Affairs 96, no. 3 (2017): 36–44.Google Scholar

Copeland, Paul, and Daly, Mary E.. ‘The European Semester and EU Social Policy’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56, no. 5 (28 February 2018): 1001–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremaschi, Simone, Rettl, Paula, Cappelluti, Marco, and De Vries, Catherine E.. ‘Geographies of Discontent: Public Service Deprivation and the Rise of the Far Right in Italy’. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 24-024 (1 November 2023).Google Scholar

Crouch, Colin. ‘Privatised Keynesianism: An Unacknowledged Policy Regime’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11, no. 3 (1 August 2009): 382–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Dani, Marco, Chiti, Edoardo, Mendes, Joana, Menéndez, Agustín José, Schepel, Harm, and Wilkinson, Michael, ‘At the End of the Law: A Moment of Truth for the Eurozone and the EU,’ University of Luxembourg Working Paper (2020). https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/45861/1/Weiss-VB.pdf.Google Scholar

Dari‐Mattiacci, Giuseppe, Gelderblom, Oscar, Jonker, Joost, and Enrico, Perotti. ‘The Emergence of the Corporate Form’. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 33, no. 2 (24 March 2017): 193–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, Mark. ‘New Governance and the Displacement of Social Europe: The Case of the European Semester,’ European Constitutional Law Review 14, no. 1 (2018): 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Domurath, Irina, and Chantal, Mak. ‘Private Law and Housing Justice in Europe’. The Modern Law Review 83, no. 6 (2020): 1188–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dukes, Ruth. The Labour Constitution: The Enduring Idea of Labour Law. Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Kesic, Josip. ‘The Return of the Native: Can Liberalism Safeguard Us against Nativism?’ In Oxford Studies in Culture and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eco, Umberto. ‘Ur-Fascism’. The New York Review of Books 22 (1995): 12–5.Google Scholar

Ellinas, Antonis A. ’Media and the Radical Right’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, edited by Rydgren, Jens, 269–84. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Esposito, Roberto. Institution. John Wiley & Sons, 2022.Google ScholarPubMed

Esposito, Roberto.  Politics and Negation: For an Affirmative Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.Google Scholar

European Banking Authority. ‘Final EBA Report on Undue Short-Term Pressures from the Financial Sector’. European Banking Authority (2019) www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document_library/Final%20EBA%20report%20on%20undue%20short-term%20pressures%20from%20the%20financial%20sector%20v2_0.pdf.Google Scholar

European Economists for an Alternative Economic Policy in Europe, ‘EuroMemorandum 2020: A Green New Deal for Europe – Opportunities and Challenges’. Euromemo Group (2019) www.euromemo.eu/euromemorandum/euromemorandum_2020/index.html.Google Scholar

Feichtner, Isabel, Krajewski, Markus, and Roesch, Ricarda, eds. Human Rights in the Extractive Industries: Transparency, Participation, Resistance, vol. 3, Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights. Springer International Publishing, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fennis, Bob M., and Stroebe, Wolfgang. The Psychology of Advertising. Psychology Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, Valeria. ‘The Platformisation of Digital Payments: The Fabrication of Consumer Interest in the EU FinTech Agenda’. Computer Law & Security Review 45 (1 July 2022): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fetzer, , Thiemo. ‘Did Austerity Cause Brexit?’ American Economic Review 109, no. 11 (1 November 2019): 3849–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fici, Antonio. ‘The New Italian Code of the Third Sector. Essence and Principles of a Historic Legislative Reform’. In The Law of Third Sector Organizations in Europe, edited by Fici, Antonio, 115–39. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flamant, Eloi, Godar, Sarah, and Richard, Gaspard. ‘New Forms of Tax Competition in the European Union: An Empirical Investigation’. EU-Tax Observatory (2021).Google Scholar

Folbre, Nancy. ‘The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16, no. 3 (1 April 1991): 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Føllesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. ‘Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 3 (16 August 2006): 533–62.Google Scholar

France, Alan. Understanding Youth in the Global Economic Crisis. Policy Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, and Jaeggi, Rahel. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Polity, 2018.Google Scholar

Frey, Carl Benedikt. The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation. Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Funke, , Manuel, Schularick, Moritz, and Trebesch, Christoph. ‘Going to Extremes: Politics after Financial Crises, 1870–2014’. European Economic Review 88C (1 September 2016): 227–60.Google Scholar

Gabor, Daniela. ‘The (European) Derisking State’. Stato e mercato 1 (2023): 53–84.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Ricardo Duque, Klein, Mathias, and Pessoa, Ana Sofia. ‘The Political Costs of Austerity’. The Review of Economics and Statistics (27 September 2023): 1–45. https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article-abstract/doi/10.1162/rest_a_01373/117705/The-Political-Costs-of-Austerity?redirectedFrom=fulltext.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galofré‐Vilà, Gregori, Meissner, Christopher M., McKee, Martin, and Stuckler, David. ‘Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party’. The Journal of Economic History 81, no. 1 (11 January 2021): 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. ‘Common Sense as a Cultural System’. The Antioch Review 33, no. 1 (1 January 1975): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelter, Martin. EU Company Law Harmonization between Convergence and Varieties of Capitalism. ECGI, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghodsee, Kristen R. Everyday Utopia: What 2,000 Years of Wild Experiments Can Teach Us about the Good Life. Simon & Schuster, 2023.Google Scholar

Ging, Debbie. ‘Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere’. Men And Masculinities 22, no. 4 (10 May 2017): 638–57.Google Scholar

Green, Andy. The Crisis for Young People: Generational Inequalities in Education, Work, Housing and Welfare. Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greve, Bent. Welfare, Populism and Welfare Chauvinism. Policy Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter. ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’ European Law Journal 1, no. 3 (1995): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grundmann, Stefan. ‘The Concept of the Private Law Society: After 50 Years of European Business and European Business Law’. European Review of Private Law 16, no. 4 (2008): 553–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guriev, Sergei, and Elias, Papaioannou. ‘The Political Economy of Populism’. Journal of Economic Literature 60, no. 3 (1 September 2022): 753–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics. John Wiley & Sons, 2023.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Polity Press, 1997Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.  Communication and the Evolution of Society. Beacon Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’ European Law Journal 1, no. 3 (1 November 1995): 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldane, Andrew. ‘Whose Recovery?’ Speech at the Bank of England (30 June 2016). www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2016/whose-recovery.Google Scholar

Hale, Robert L. ‘Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State’. Political Science Quarterly 38, no. 3 (1 September 1923): 470–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harremoes, Paul, Gee, David, MacGarvin, Malcom, Stirling, Andy, Keys, Jane, Wynne, Brian, and Vaz, Sofia Guedes. The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings. Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartley, Kris, Van Santen, Ralf, and Kirchherr, Julian. ‘Policies for Transitioning towards a Circular Economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU)’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 155 (1 April 2020): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. ‘The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism’. New Commonwealth Quarterly  5 (1939): 131–49.Google Scholar

Hermann, Christoph, and Verhoest, Koen. ‘Varieties and Variations of Public-Service: Liberalisation and Privatisation in Europe’. PIQUE Policy Paper 1 (2008): 1–12.Google Scholar

Hess, David J., and Sovacool, Benjamin K.. ‘Sociotechnical Matters: Reviewing and Integrating Science and Technology Studies with Energy Social Science’. Energy Research & Social Science 65 (1 July 2020): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesselink, Martijn W. ‘Alienation Commodification: A Critique of the Role of EU Consumer Law’. European Law Open 2, no. 2 (1 June 2023): 405–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesselink, Martijn W. ‘Common Frame of Reference & Social Justice’. European Review of Contract Law 4, no. 3 (1 January 2008): 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesselink, Martijn W. Justifying Contract in Europe: Political Philosophies of European Contract Law. Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hickel, Jason, and Kallis, Giorgos. ‘Is Green Growth Possible?’ New Political Economy 25, no. 4 (2019): 469–86.Google Scholar

Hinteregger, Monika. ‘Civil Liability and the Challenges of Climate Change: A Functional Analysis’. Journal of European Tort Law 8, no. 2 (2 November 2017): 238–60.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Harvard University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hishiyama, Izumi. ‘The Tableau Economique of Quesnay’. Kyoto University Economic Review 30, no. 1 (1960): 1–46.Google Scholar

Hüller, Thorsten, and Kohler‐Koch, Beate. ‘Assessing the Democratic Value of Civil Society Engagement in the European Union’. in EU Governance to Civil Society – Gains and Challenges, edited by Beate Kohler-Koch, Dirk de Bièvre, and William Maloney, CONNEX Report Series 05 (1 January 2008): 145–81.Google Scholar

Ireland, Paddy. ‘Corporate Schizophrenia: The Corporation as a Separate Legal Person and an Object of Property’, University of Bristol Working Paper (2016).Google Scholar

Irion, Kristina, Yakovleva, Svetlana, and Bartl, Marija, ‘Trade and Privacy: Complicated Bedfellows?,’ How to Achieve Data Protection-Proof Free Trade Agreements (13 July 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2877166 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2877166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaakkola, Jussi. ‘Taming the Leviathan or Dismantling Democratic Government? Evolving Political Ideas on Spontaneous Income Tax Integration in the European Union’. European Law Open 2, no. 3 (2023): 575–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jabko, Nicolas. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jackson, Tim. Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. Taylor & Francis, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janoski, Thomas, and Gran, Brian. ‘Political Citizenship: Foundations of Rights’. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, edited by Isin, Engin F. and Turner, Bryan S., 13–52. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun, Kim. ‘Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea’. Minerva 47, no. 2 (1 June 2009): 119–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian, and Polanyi, Karl. Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets. Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian, and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh. Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions. Hart Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar

Joerges, Christian, Mény, Yves, Weiler, Joseph, Burgess, Inge, Engert, Chris, and Scharpf, Fritz W.. ’Mountain of Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance’. Jean Monnet Working Papers, Harvard Law School (2001).Google Scholar

Johnson, Simon, and Daron, Acemoglu. Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. Hachette UK, 2023.Google Scholar

José Menéndez, Agustín. ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union,’ German Law Journal 14, no. 5 (2013): 453–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judt, Tony. Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

Kaupa, Clemens. ‘Has (Downturn-)Austerity Really Been “Constitutionalized” in Europe? On the Ideological Dimension of Such a Claim’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (2017): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaupa, Clemens. The Pluralist Character of the European Economic Constitution. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar

Kellij, Sara, and Hilhorst, Ester. ‘Negen Op Tien Nederlanders: Sprake van “wooncrisis”’. Ipsos I&O (2 November 2023). www.ioresearch.nl/actueel/negen-op-tien-nederlanders-sprake-van-wooncrisis/.Google Scholar

Kelton, Stephanie. The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and How to Build a Better Economy. Hachette UK, 2020.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. Princeton University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’. In The New Law and Economic Development, edited by Alvaro Santos and Trubek, David M., 19–73. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keune, Maarten ‘Not Balanced and Hardly New: The European Commission’s Quest for Flexicurity’. ETUI, The European Trade Union Institute (2007).Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. ‘The End of Laissez-Faire’. In Essays in Persuasion, 272–94. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kjaer, Poul F. ‘The Law of Political Economy: An Introduction’. In The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law, 1–30. Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Ezra. Why We’re Polarized. Simon & Schuster, 2020.Google Scholar

Klein, Peter G. The Capitalist & The Entrepreneur. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010.Google Scholar

Knill, Christoph, and Tosun, Jale. Public Policy: A New Introduction. Red Globe Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan. European Constitutional Imaginaries: Between Ideology and Utopia. Oxford University Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Komárek, Jan. ‘European Constitutional Imaginaries: Utopias, Ideologies and the Other,’ SSRN Scholarly Paper (29 October 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, Paul. ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession Essay’. Foreign Affairs 73, no. 2 (1994): 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Kukovec, Damjan. ‘Law and the Periphery’. European Law Journal 21, no. 3 (20 November 2015): 406–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwon, Kibum, and Soebin, Jang. ‘There Is No Good War for Talent: A Critical Review of the Literature on Talent Management’. Employee Relations 44, no. 1 (2021): 94–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards A Radical Democratic Politics. Verso Books, 2014.Google Scholar

Leaman, , Jeremy The Bundesbank Myth: Towards a Critique of Central Bank Independence. Springer, 2000.Google Scholar

Leino-Sandberg, Päivi. ‘Constitutional Imaginaries of Solidarity: Framing Fiscal Integration Post-NGEU,’ University of Helsinki Working Paper (2023). https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstreams/6c044fbd-a8ee-4bb1-a884-baf52446888a/download;.Google Scholar

Leone, Candida. ‘The Missing Stone in the Cathedral: Of Unfair Terms in Employment Contracts and Coexisting Rationalities in European Contract Law’. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam, 2022. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/48074023/Thesis_complete_.pdf.Google Scholar

Leone, Candida. ‘Transparency Revisited – On the Role of Information in the Recent Case-Law of the CJEU’. European Review of Contract Law 10, no. 2 (1 January 2014): 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leone, Candida, and Van Duin, Joanna M. L.. ‘The Real (New) Deal: Levelling the Odds for Consumer-Litigants: On the Need for a Modernization, Part II’. European Review of Private Law 27, no. 6 (2019): 1227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesniewska, Feja, and Steenmans, Katrien. Circular Economy and the Law: Bringing Justice into the Frame. Taylor & Francis, 2023.Google Scholar

Liverman, Diana. ‘Who Governs, at What Scale and at What Price? Geography, Environmental Governance, and the Commodification of Nature,’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94, no. 4 (1 December 2004): 734–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lofstedt, Ragnar E.. The ‘Plateau-ing’ of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An Analysis of Activities Carried Out by the Barroso Commission 1,’ Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals 10, no. 4 (June 2007):423–447.Google Scholar

Loos, Marco B. M. ‘Full Harmonisation as a Regulatory Concept and Its Consequences for the National Legal Orders. The Example of the Consumer Rights Directive’. Centre for the Study of European Contract Law Working Paper Series, No. 2010/03 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, Donald, and Millo, Yuval. ‘Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange’. American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 1 (1 July 2003): 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnuson, William. For Profit: A History of Corporations. Hachette UK, 2022.Google Scholar

Mak, Chantal. ‘Gutiérrez Naranjo – On Limits in Law and Limits of Law’. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, No. 2017-38 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Chantal. ‘Giving Voice: A Public Sphere Theory of European Private Law Adjudication’. European Law Open 2, no. 4 (2023): 697–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Chantal, and Kas, Betül. Civil Courts and the European Polity: The Constitutional Role of Private Law Adjudication in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Vanessa, and Terryn, Evelyne. ‘Circular Economy and Consumer Protection: The Consumer as a Citizen and the Limits of Empowerment through Consumer Law’. Journal of Consumer Policy 43, no. 1 (2020): 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mańko, Rafał, Škop, Martin, and Štěpáníková, Markéta, ‘Carving Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?,’ Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 6, no. 2 (1 December 2016): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchart, Oliver. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Markovits, Daniel. The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. Penguin, 2020.Google Scholar

Maruyama, Warren H. ‘A New Pillar of the WTO: Sound Science’. International Lawyer 32, no. 3 (1 January 1998): 651–77.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. ‘The German Ideology’ (1845). In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by Szeman, Imre and Kaposy, Timothy. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana. Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Penguin UK, 2021.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana.  The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, 1^st ed. Anthem Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. Penguin UK, 2019.Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana, and Rodrik, Dani. ‘Industrial Policy with Conditionalities: A Taxonomy and Sample Cases’. Working paper WP 2023/07, Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose (2023).Google Scholar

Mazzucato, Mariana, and Collington, Rosie. The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens Our Businesses, Infantilizes Our Governments and Warps Our Economies. Penguin Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Meagher, Michelle. Competition Is Killing Us: How Big Business Is Harming Our Society and Planet – and What to Do About It. Penguin UK, 2020.Google Scholar

Mellink, Bram, Oudenampsen, Merijn, and Woltring, Naomi. Neoliberalisme: Een Nederlandse Geschiedenis. Boom Amsterdam, 2022.Google Scholar

Meuwese, Anne C. M. ‘EU–US Horizontal Regulatory Cooperation: Mutual Recognition of Impact Assessment?’ In Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: The Shifting Roles of the EU, the US and California, edited by Vogel, David and Swinnen, Johan F. M., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Michel, Anaïs. ‘Premature Obsolescence: In Search of an Improved Legal Framework’. PhD diss., KU Leuven, 2022.Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘A “Certain” Future for the Optional Instrument’. In A European Optional Contract Law: Policy Choices, edited by Jansen, Sanne, 181–94. De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘The Measuring of the Law through EU Politics’. In The Politics of European Legal Research, 223–38. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-W. The Politics of Justice in European Private Law: Social Justice, Access Justice, Societal Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micklitz, Hans-W. ‘The Visible Hand of European Regulatory Private Law – The Transformation of European Private Law from Autonomy to Functionalism in Competition and Regulation’. Yearbook of European Law 28, no. 1 (1 January 2009): 3–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micklitz, Hans‐W., and Patterson, Dennis. ‘From the Nation State to the Market: The Evolution of EU Private Law’. In The EU’s Role in Global Governance: The Legal Dimension, edited by van Vooren, Bart, 59–78. Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Micklitz, Hans‐W., and Reich, Norbert. ‘The Court and Sleeping Beauty: The Revival of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (UCTD)’. Common Market Law Review 51, no. 3 (1 June 2014): 771–808.Google Scholar

Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Miller, Toby. ‘Michel Foucault, the Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79’. International Journal of Cultural Policy 16, no. 1 (1 February 2010): 56–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Jason W. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso Books, 2015.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A. ‘The Myth of Europe’s Democratic Deficit’. Intereconomics 43, no. 6 (2008): 331–40.Google Scholar

Morvillo, Marta, and Weimer, Maria. ‘Who Shapes the CJEU Regulatory Jurisprudence? On the Epistemic Power of Economic Actors and Ways to Counter It’. European Law Open 1, no. 3 (1 September 2022): 510–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. The Return of the Political. Verso Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal.  Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. Verso Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Mounk, Yascha. The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time. Penguin Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar. Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1964.Google Scholar

Niglia, Leone. The Structural Transformation of European Private Law: A Critique of Juridical Hermeneutics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Riordan, Timothy, and Cameron, James. ‘The History and Contemporary Significance of the Precautionary Principle’. In Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, 1–19. Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

O’Toole, Fintan. ‘Review of Defying Tribalism, by Susan Neiman’. The New York Review of Books (2 November 2023).Google Scholar

Pacces, Alessio M. ‘Civil Liability in the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive Proposal: A Law & Economics Analysis,’ European Corporate Governance Institute – Law Working Paper, No. 691 (2023).Google Scholar

Pargendler, Mariana. ‘The Corporate Governance Obsession’. Journal of Corporation Law 42 (2016): 359–402.Google Scholar

Pelkmans, Jacques. ‘The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization’. Journal of Common Market Studies 25, no. 3 (1987): 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst‐Ulrich. ‘Neoliberalism, Ordoliberalism and the Future of Economic Governance’. Journal of International Economic Law 26, no. 4 (December 2023): 836–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pianta, Mario. ‘An Industrial Policy for Europe’. Seoul Journal of Economics 27 (2014): 277–305.Google Scholar

Piketty, Thomas. Capital and Ideology. Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Piketty, Thomas.  Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pistor, Katharina. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Polverini, Davide. ‘Regulating the Circular Economy within the Ecodesign Directive: Progress so Far, Methodological Challenges and Outlook’. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27 (1 July 2021): 1113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ponticelli, Jacopo, and Hans-Joachim, Voth. ‘Austerity and Anarchy: Budget Cuts and Social Unrest in Europe, 1919–2008’. Journal of Comparative Economics 48, no. 1 (2020): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Přibáň, Jiří. Constitutional Imaginaries: A Theory of European Societal Constitutionalism. Routledge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D.  The Upswing: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can Do It Again. Simon & Schuster, 2020.Google Scholar

Rau, Thomas, and Oberhuber, Sabine. Material Matters: Developing Business for a Circular Economy. Taylor & Francis, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a Twenty-first-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Read, Rupert, and O’Riordan, Tim. ‘The Precautionary Principle under Fire’. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 59, no. 5 (18 August 2017): 4–15.Google Scholar

Reich, Norbert, and Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang. ‘Crónica de una muerte anunciada: The Commission Proposal for a “Directive on Consumer Rights”’. Common Market Law Review 46 (2009): 471–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhode, Deborah L. ‘Access to Justice’. Fordham Law Review 69 (2000): 1785–819.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Robé, Jean-Philippe. Property, Power and Politics: Why We Need to Rethink the World Power System. Policy Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Anat. ‘Exaggeration: Advertising, Law and Medical Quackery in Britain, c. 1840–1914’. The Journal of Legal History 42, no. 2 (4 May 2021): 202–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosset, Jan, Giger, Nathalie, and Bernauer, Julian. ‘More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation’. West European Politics 36, no. 4 (1 July 2013): 817–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samson, David R. Our Tribal Future: How to Channel Our Foundational Human Instincts into a Force for Good. St. Martin’s Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Allen Lane, 2020.Google Scholar

Sanders, Senator Bernie. It’s OK to Be Angry about Capitalism. Crown, 2023.Google Scholar

Sauer, Hanno. Moral Teleology: A Theory of Progress. Taylor & Francis, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. ‘Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Preemption of Democracy’. MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 11, 2011, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scharpf, Fritz W. ‘The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a “Social Market Economy”’. Socio-Economic Review 8, no. 2 (24 December 2010), 211–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schepel, Harm. ‘The Bank, the Bond, and the Bail-Out: On the Legal Construction of Market Discipline in the Eurozone’. Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 1 (1 March 2017): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, Christoph U. ‘The Instrumentalist Conception of the Acquis Communautaire in Consumer Law and Its Implications on a European Contract Law Code,’ European Review of Contract Law 1, no. 2 (July 2005): 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A., and Mark, Thatcher. ‘Why Are Neoliberal Ideas so Resilient in Europe’s Political Economy?’ Critical Policy Studies 8, no. 3 (3 July 2014): 340–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. ‘Neo-Neofunctionalism’. In European Integration Theory, 1st ed., edited by Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas, 46–74. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schularick, Moritz. ‘Public and Private Debt: The Historical Record (1870–2010)’. German Economic Review 15, no. 1 (1 February 2014): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, Kate Alexander. Baby Boomers versus Millennials: Rhetorical Conflicts and Interest. Shefffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI) (2018).Google Scholar

Siems, Mathias M. ‘Shareholder Protection around the World (‘Leximetric II’)’. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper, No. 359 (December 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silva, Margarida. ‘The European Union’s Revolving Door Problem’. In Lobbying in the European Union, edited by Dialer, Doris and Richter, Margarethe, 273–89. Springer, 2019Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, Beate. ‘Redefining the Corporation for a Sustainable New Economy’. Journal of Law and Society 45, no. 1 (2018): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sjåfjell, Beate, Johnston, Andrew, Anker-Sørensen, Linn, and Millon, David K.. ‘Shareholder Primacy: The Main Barrier to Sustainable Companies’. In Company Law and Sustainability, edited by Sjåfjell, Beate and Richardson, Benjamin J., 79–147. Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobodian, Quinn. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Şorman, Alevgül H. ‘Deceitful Decoupling: Misconceptions of a Persistent Myth’. In Studies in Ecological Economics, edited by Kerry Turner, R., Costanza, Robert, and Farley, Joshua, 165–77. Springer, 2023.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart, and McAdams, Stephen. ‘News, Politics, and Negativity’. Political Communication 32, no. 1 (2 January 2015): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srinivasan, Amia. The Right to Sex: Feminism in the Twenty-First Century in the United States. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021 .Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘Government Failure vs. Market Failure: Principles of Regulation’. In Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, edited by Balleisen, Edward J. and Moss, David A., 13–51. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang. ‘The Crises of Democratic Capitalism’. New Left Review, no. 71 (January 1, 2011): 5–29.Google Scholar

Sum, Ngai-Ling, and Jessop, Bob. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzman, James. Work: A History of How We Spend Our Time. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Modern Social Imaginaries. Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther. ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory’. In Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, edited by Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inge-Johanne, and Teubner, Gunther, 3–28. Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law & Society Review 17, no. 2 (1 January 1983): 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Edward Palmer. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. Pantheon, 1975.Google Scholar

Tørsløv, Thomas, Wier, Ludvig, and Zucman, Gabriel. ‘The Missing Profits of Nations’. The Review of Economic Studies 90, no. 3 (2023): 1499–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trentmann, Frank. Empire of Things: How We Became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First. Penguin UK, 2016.Google Scholar

Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan. ‘Transnational Class Agency and European Governance: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists’. New Political Economy 5, no. 2 (1 July 2000): 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dam, P. ‘The Entangled Consumer: Rethinking the Rise of the Consumer after 1945’. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 33, no. 2 (2021): 212–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Hoek, Aukje A. H. ‘Re-Embedding the Transnational Employment Relationship: A Tale about the Limitations of (EU) Law?,’ Common Market Law Review 55, no. 2 (2018): 449–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. ‘Possibilities of the Past: Histories of the NIEO and the Travails of Critique,’ Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire Du Droit International 20, no. 3 (2018): 263–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, Jefim, Guérin, Gauthier, O’Neill, Daniel W., and Steinberger, J.. ‘Safeguarding Livelihoods against Reductions in Economic Output’. Ecological Economics 215 (1 January 2024): 107977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vukov, Visnja. ‘Growth Models in Europe’s Eastern and Southern Peripheries: Between National and EU Politics’. New Political Economy 28, no. 5 (3 September 2023): 832–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, Wendy. ‘Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture’. Duke Law Journal 59, no. 7 (1 January 2010): 1321–1432.Google Scholar

Weatherill, Stephen. ‘Competence Creep and Competence Control’. Yearbook of European Law 23, no. 1 (1 January 2004): 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. 2. University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Wettstein, Florian. ‘The History of Business and Human Rights and Its Relationship with Corporate Social Responsibility’. In Research Handbook on Human Rights and Business, edited by Deva, Surya and Birchall, David, 23–45. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar

Whitehouse, Senator Sheldon. Captured: The Corporate Infiltration of American Democracy. The New Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Wolf, Martin. The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Penguin Press, 2023.Google Scholar

World Bank. Doing Business – an Independent Evaluation: Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators. World Bank Publications, 2008.Google Scholar

Young, J. Michael. ‘Kant’s View of Imagination’. Kant-Studien 79, nos. 1–4 (1 January 1988): 140–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeitlin, Jonathan, and Bart, Vanhercke. ‘Socializing the European Semester: EU Social and Economic Policy Co-ordination in Crisis and Beyond’. Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 2 (2018): 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso Books, 1989.Google Scholar