Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption,” American Economic Review, 89, 4 (September): 982–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1995. “Competition and Corruption.” Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 169. Oxford University.

Ágh, Attila, ed. 1994. The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center of Democracy Studies.Google Scholar

Ágh, Attila, and Kurtán, Sándor. 1996. “‘Parliaments’ and ‘Organized Interests’ in Civil Society: Local Government Legislation and Elections in Hungary (1990–1995),” in Ágh, Attila, and Ilonszki, Gabriella, eds. Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies.Google Scholar

Ákos, Róna-Tas. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Albats, Yevgenia. 2003. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2005. “Informal Politics and Challenges to Democracy: Administrative Resource in Kuchma's Ukraine.” Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.

Amsden, Alice, Kochanowicz, Jacek, and Taylor, Lance. 1994. The Market Meets Its Match. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ansell, Christopher, and Burris, Arthur. 1997. “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development, 11 (Spring): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2001. “Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle,” East European Politics and Societies, 15, 3: 528–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arian, Alan, and Barnes, Samuel. 1974. “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability,” Journal of Politics, 36, 1: 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auers, Daunis. 2002/2003. “Latvia's 2002 Elections: Dawn of a New Era?” East European Constitutional Review, 11/12, 4/1 (Fall/Winter): 106–10.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar

Baldersheim, Harald, et al. 1996. “New Institutions of Local Government: A Comparison,” in Baldersheim, Harald, Illner, Michal, Offerdal, Audun, Rose, Lawrence, and Swaniewicz, Paweł, eds. Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Andrew. 2003. “Comparative Theft: Context and Choice in the Hungarian Czech, and Russian Transformations 1989–2000,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 3: 533–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, David. 1996. “Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilization Policy in Hungary,” Europe-Asia Studies, 48, 1: 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 1999–2000. “Collusion, Competition, and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 4: 435–70; 12, 1: 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 2002. “Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems,” in Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan, eds. Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barzelay, Michael. 1997. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing,” Governance, 10, 3: 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathan, Glazer, A., Hammond, T. 2001. “Theories of Delegation,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Colin. 1997. “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, 10, 3: 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change,” Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Hayden, Jacqueline. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989–2001,” Journal of Politics, 66, 2: 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bercík, Peter, and Nemec, Juraj. 1999. “The Civil Service System of the Slovak Republic,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. 2000. “Institutional Choice After Communism,” East European Politics and Societies, 3: 316–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bielasiak, Jack. 1983. “The Party: Permanent Crisis,” in Brumberg, Abraham, ed. Poland: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Birch, Sarah. 2002. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Birch, Sarah. 2001. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 30 August–2 September 2001, San Francisco.

Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2005. “Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization,” Comparative Political Studies, 38, 8 (October): 915–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruszt, Laszlo, and Stark, David. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition,” Journal of International Affairs, 45, 1 (Summer): 201–45.Google Scholar

Brym, Robert, and Gimpelson, Vladimir. 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s,” Slavic Review, 63, 1: 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1963. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bugaric, Bojan. 2005. “The Europeanization of National Administrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Creating Formal Structures Without Substance?” Paper prepared for the Apres Enlargement Workshop, EUI, Florence, 29–30 April.

Bukowska, Xymena, and Czesnik, Mikołaj. 2002. “Analiza Treści Programów Wyborczych,” in Markowski, Radoslaw, ed. System Partyjny I Zachowania Wyborcze. Warsaw: ISP PAN.Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 1999. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism,” Slavic Review 58, 4: 756–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4 October): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

CBOS. 2000. “Finansowanie partii politycznych.” Komunikat z badań (Fall).

Cekota, Jaromir, Gönenç, Rauf, and Kwang-Yeol Yoo. 2002. “Strengthening the Management of Public Spending in Hungary,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 336 (30 July).

Center for Study of Democracy. 2004. Brief. Bulgaria Sofia (July). Available at http://www.csd.bg, accessed 19 November 2004.

Čigāne, Lolita. 2002. “A Reflection of the Shortcomings in Legislation on Party Financing in the 2001 Finance Declarations.” Soros Foundation Latvia and Transparency International “delna,” Riga Latvia (April). Available at http://www.politika.lv.

Cirtautas, Arista. 1995. “The Post-Leninist State: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28, 4: 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colazingari, Silvia, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America,” Political Science Quarterly, 113, 3: 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Research Note: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3: 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomer, Josep. 1995. “Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comisso, Ellen. 1986. “State Structures, Political Processes, and Collective Choice in CMEA States,” in Comisso, Ellen, and Tyson, Laura D'Andrea, eds. Power, Purpose, and Collective Choice: Economic Strategy in Socialist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2001. “Political Darwinism in Latin America's Lost Decade,” in Larry, Diamond, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 1993. “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 1 (April): 253–74.Google Scholar

Cotta, Maurizio. 1996. “Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilising Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crenson, Matthew, and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2004. Downsizing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Crombrugghe, Alain de. 1997. “Wage and Pension Pressure on the Polish Budget.” Report for World Bank Project RPO 678–96, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1793.

Czabański, Krzysztof. 2003. “Rywin TV.” Wprost, 26 October.

Dallek, Robert. 1998. Flawed Giant: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1960–1973. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1974. “Need for Achievement and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Party Success in Elections and Coalitions,” American Political Science Review, 68, 3: 1207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. “Political Parties and Corruption: 17 Hypotheses on the Interactions Between Parties and Corruption.” EUI Working Papers RSC 2000/60, European University Institute, Fiesole, San Domenico, Italy.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Meny, Yves, eds. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 516–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. “Establishing Party Dominance,” in Pempel, T. J., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 2000. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies,” Journal of Economic Theory, 94: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dnitrova, Zoya. 2002. Financing Election Campaigns. Unpublished Manuscript. Ljabljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1965. Political Parties. New York: Wiley and Sons, p. 308.Google Scholar

Dyson, Kenneth. 1977. “Party, State, and Bureaucracy in Western Germany.” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01-063. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

East European Constitutional Review. 2001. (Winter). Available at http://www.balticsworldwide.com/wkcrier/0301_0322_99.htm, accessed February 9, 2006. RFE/RL OMRI Daily Digest Report, 29 July 1996.

Ekiert, Grzegorz. 2001. The State After State Socialism: Poland in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Zielonka, Jan. 2003. “Introduction: Academic Boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU's Eastward Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1 (Winter): 7–23.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Party Politics in Post-Communist Transition,” in Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt. 2003. “Cleavage Formation in Hungary: The Role of Agency.” Paper presented at the 2003 Joint Sessions of the ECPR Edinburgh.

Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Organizing a Sub-Cultural Party in Eastern Europe,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, David, and O'Halloryn, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion,” American Journal of Political Science, 38/3: 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Union Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: EU.

Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyal, Gil, Szelényi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1953. How Russia Is Ruled. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 30: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fidrmuc, Jan, Fidrmuc, Jarko, and Horvath, Julius. 2002. “Visegrad Economies: Growth Experience and Prospects.” GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic Growth.

Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. “The Politics of Property Rights,” American Political Science Review, 89, 4: 867–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World,” East European Politics and Societies, 12: 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House, Freedom. 2002. Nations in Transit, 2001. Washington: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Frič, Pavol. 1999. Korupce na český způsob. Prague: G Plus G.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl, and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Frydman, Roman, Murphy, Kenneth, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1998. Capitalism with a Comrade's Face. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization,” World Politics, 54 (April), pp. 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30: 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganev, Venelin. 2005. Preying on the State: State Formation in Post-Communist Bulgaria (1989–1997). Unpublished Manuscript.

Ganev, Venelin. 2000. “Post-Communism as a Historical Episode of State Building, or Explaining the Weakness of the Post-Communist State.” Paper presented at the twelfth International Conference of Europeanists Chicago, March.

Gazsó, Ferenc. 1992. “Cadre Bureaucracy and the Intelligentsia,” Journal of Communist Studies (September): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1994. The Politician's Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly, 4: 641–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Treisman, Daniel. 2002. “Fiscal Games and Public Employment,” World Politics, 54: 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, Klaus H. 2001. “Making Sense of Post-Communist Central Administration: Modernization Europeanization or Latinization?” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1032–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, Klaus, and Margetts, Helen. 1999. “The Solitary Center: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe,” Governance, 12, 4 (October): 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics, 53: 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Arthur. 1999. “Africa's Overgrown State Reconsidered,” World Politics, 4: 520–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Government of the Czech Republic. 1998. “Programové prohlašení Vlády České Republiky” [Programmatic declaration of the Government of the Czech Republic] (27 January). Available at http://www.vlada.cz/ASC/urad/historie/vlada98/dokumenty/progrprohl.il2.htm.

Government of the Republic of Slovakia. 2001. “Správa o boji proti korupcii na Slovensku.” [Report of the Slovak government]. October. Available at http://www.government.gov.sk, accessed 23 November 2002.

Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion, and Diversity,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, Kenneth. 2004. Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Gros, Daniel, and Suhcrke, Marc. 2000. “Ten Years After: What Is Special About Transition Countries?” EBRD Working Paper No. 56, August.

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State.” Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Ideas in Post-Communist Politics: A Re-Evaluation Havighurst Center, Luxembourg, 5–9 July.

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10 (December): 1123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. 2003. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Communist State,” Politics and Society, 30, 4 (December): 529–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

György, Istvan. 1999. “The Civil Service System of Hungary,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 131–58.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar

Hadenius, Stig. 1985. Swedish Politics During the 20th Century. Boras: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József. 1999. “Hungarian Local Government,” in Emil, Kirchner, ed., Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael, and Levine, Victor, eds. 1989. Political Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 2 (January): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellman, Joel, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economics,” Finance and Development, 38, 3 (September).Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2444.

Hendley, Katherine. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, Yoshiko. 2001. “Russian Economic Reform 1991–1998,” in Barany, Zoltan, and Moser, Robert, eds. Challenges to Democratic Transition In Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesse, Joachim Jens. 1993. “From Transformation to Modernization: Administrative Change in Central and Eastern Europe,” in idem. ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heywood, Paul. 1997. “Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirszowicz, Maria. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Hojnacki, William. 1996. “Politicization as a Civil Service Dilemma,” in Bekke, Hans, Perry, James, and Toonen, Theo, eds. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 137–64.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse: Probing the Post-Communist Dilemma,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed. Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economic and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Stockholm: Swedish School of Economics.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Shale, and Petréš, Martin. 2003. “Pride and Prejudice in Prague: Understanding Early Policy Error and Belsteol Reform in Czech Economic Transition,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 2: 231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horráth, Tamás, ed. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Hough, Jerry. 1969. The Soviet Prefects. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, Jerry, and Fainsod, Merle. 1979. How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchcroft, Paul. 1998. Booty Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Ichino, Nahomi. 2006. Thugs and Voters: Political Tournaments in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Ikstens, Jānis, Smilov, Daniel, and Walecki, Marcin. 2002. “Campaign Finance in Central and Eastern Europe,” IFES Reports (April). Washington: IFES.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2002. “A Functional Clarification of Parliamentary Committees in Hungary, 1990–1998,” in Olson, David, and Crowther, William, eds. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2000. “The Second Generation Political Elite in Hungary: Partial Consolidation,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe. Warsaw: PAN ISP.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1998. “Representation Deficit in a New Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Hungarian Case,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 14: 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

INEKO for the Slovak Government. 2000. “Zaverečná správa o výsledkoch a odporučaniach audity súladu činnosti a financovania úsredných orgánov štátnej správy,” August.

Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Post-Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery,” Comparative Politics, 35, 1: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Monetary Fund. 1999. Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, August 1999/March 2000.

Ishiyama, John. 1997. “Transitional Electoral Systems in Post-Communist Eastern Europe,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pildes, Richard. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process,” Stanford Law Review (February): 642–717.Google Scholar

Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint,” World Politics, 50, 4: 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jabłoński, A. 1998. “Europeanization of Public Administration in Central Europe: Poland in Comparative Perspective.” NATO Individual Democratic Institution Research Fellowships, Final Report 1995–7.

Jackman, Robert. 1993. Power Without Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacoby, Wade. 2004. The Enlargement of the EU and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarosz, Maria. 2001. Manowce Polskiej Prywatyzacji. Warszawa: PWN SA.Google Scholar

Jednotka boji proti korupci, Ministry of Interior. 2001. Zpráva o korupci v ČR a o plnění harmonogramu opatření vládního programu boje proti korupci v ČR.

Johns, Michael. 2003. “Do as I Say and Not as I Do: The European Union, Eastern Europe, and Minority Rights,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 4 (November): 682–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, 98, 1: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jungerstam-Mulders, Susanne, ed. 2006. Post-Communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kalniņš, Valts, and Čigāne, Lolita. 2003. “On the Road Toward a More Honest Society.” Policy Report, January. Available at http://www.politika.lv.

Kaminski, Antoni. 1992. An Institutional Theory of Communist Regimes: Design, Function, and Breakdown. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar

Kang, David. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, Karel. 1993. Aparát ÚV KSC v letech 1948–1968. Sesity Ústavu pro Soudobé Dějiny AV ČR Sv. 10.

Kaplan, Karel. 1987. The Short March: The Communist Takeover of Power in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1948. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Karasimeonov, Georgii. 1996. “Bulgaria's New Party System,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilizing Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karklins, Rasma. 2002. Typology of Post-Communist Corruption, Problems of Post-Communism, 49 (July/August): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karl-Heinz, Nassmacher. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy,” Party Politics, 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, Daniel. 2003. “Rethinking Governance: Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy.” World Bank Working Paper.

Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. 2005. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators 1996–2004. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keri, Laszlo. 1994. Balance: The Hungarian Government 1990–1994. Budapest: Korridor.Google Scholar

Kettle, Steve. 1995. “Straining at the Seams.” Transition (April). Available at http://www.tol.cz.

King, Roswitha. 2003. “Conversations with Civil Servants: Interview Results from Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Poland.” Manuscript, University of Latvia Riga.

Kiss, Csilla. 2003. “From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post-Communist Hungary,” East European Politics and Societies, 16, 3, 739–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. “Divergent Paths of Post-Communist Democracies,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 299–323.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldová, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gábor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. Forthcoming. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction,” in Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, , eds. Patrons, Clients, and Linkages. Manuscript, Duke University.Google Scholar

KNAB. 2003. “Progress and Results in the Field of Corruption Prevention and Combat,” Periodic Update 24 (November). Available at http://www.knab.gov.lv/ru/actual/article.php?id=18863, accessed 12 February 2004.

Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochanowicz, Jacek. 1994. “Reforming Weak States and Deficient Bureaucracies,” in Nelson, Joan M., Kochanowicz, Jacek, Mizsei, Kalman, and Munoz, Oscar, eds. Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Washington: Overseas Development Council, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar

Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment,” Party Politics, 4: 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopecký, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of the Symbiosis,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kopstein, Jeff, and Reilly, David. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, 53, 1: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körösényi, Andras. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, 16, 2 (January): 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krašovec, Alenka. 2001. “Party and State in Democratic Slovenia,” in Lewis, Paul G., ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar

Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2006. Elected Affinities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Krueger, Anne. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review, 64, 3: 291–303.Google Scholar

Krupavičius, Algis. 1998. “The Post-Communist Transition and Institutionalization of Lithuania's Parties,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption,” British Journal of Political Science, 35: 573–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurczewski, Jacek. 1999. “The Rule of Law in Poland,” in Přibán, Jiří, and Young, James, eds. The Rule of Law in Central Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lancaster, Thomas D., and Montinolla, Gabriella. 2001. “Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3 (Fall): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palombara, Joseph. 1994. “Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption,” Social Research, 61, 2 (Summer): 325–50.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1999. “Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar

Lawson, Stephanie. 1993. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization,” Comparative Politics, 25, 2 (January): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Levite, Ariel, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1983. “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems,” Comparative Politics, 15, 3 (April): 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewanski, Rudolf. 1997. “Italian Civil Service: A Pre-Modern Bureaucracy in Transition?” Paper prepared for the Conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University, 5–8 April.

Lewis, Paul, and Gortat, Radzisława. 1995. “Models of Party Development and Questions of State Dependence in Poland,” Party Politics, 4: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lieven, Anatol. 1994. The Baltic Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arendt, ed. 1992. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lindberg, Staffan. 2004. The Power of Elections: Democratic Participation, Competition, and Legitimacy in Africa. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar

Linek, Lukáš. 2002. “Czech Republic,” European Journal of Political Research, 41: 931–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linek, Lukáš, and Rakušanová, Petra. 2002. “Parties in the Parliament: Why, When, and How Do Parties Act in Unity?” Institute of Sociology, Czech Republic Sociological Paper No. 02:9.

Linz, Juan. 1994. “Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in PostCommunist Europe,” in Taras, Ray, ed. Postcommunist Presidents. Cambridge, Oxford University Press: 1–14.Google Scholar

Lippert, Barbara, Umbach, Gaby, and Wessels, Wolfgang. 2001. “Europeanization of CEE Executives: EU Membership Negotiations as a Shaping Power,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6 December): 980–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Logue, John, and Einhorn, Eric. 1988. “Restraining the Governors: The Nordic Experience with Limiting the Strong State,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Łoś, Maria, and Zybertowicz, Andrzej. 1999. “Is Revolution a Solution?” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lucking, Richard. 2003. Civil Service Training in the Context of Public Administration Reform. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of Political Competence,” in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L., eds. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. Privatizing the Police State. New York, St. Martins.Google Scholar

Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 2 (July): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mair, Peter. 1995. “Political Parties, Popular Legitimacy, and Public Privilege,” West European Politics, 18, 2 (July): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, Peter. 1994. “Party Organizations,” in Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter, eds. How Parties Organize. New York: Sage, pp. 134–57.Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico. 1994. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe,” West European Politics, 12, 3 (July): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcická, Lenka. 2001. “Vybrané aspekty financovania politických strán a hnutí v SR” [Selected aspects of party and movement financing in Slovakia]. Manuscript, Bratislava. Available at http://politika.host.sk/prispevky/prispevok_malcicka_financovaniestran.htm, accessed 21 June 2001.

Malová, Darina. 1997. “The Development of Interest Representation in Slovakia After 1989,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. 1988. States, War, and Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

“Marching Backwards: Slovakia's Counterrevolution.” 1995. October. Available at http://project-syndicate.org/surveys/marching_bac.php4, accessed 10 September, 2004.

Mattli, Walter, and Plümper, Thomas. 2002. “The Demand-Side Politics of EU Enlargement: Democracy and the Application for EU Membership,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 4: 550–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauro, Paolo. 1998. “Corruption: Causes, Consequences, and Agenda for Further Research,” Finance and Development (March): 11–14.Google Scholar

Mauro, Paolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 3: 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McChesney, Fred. 1987. “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Legal Studies, 16: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Structure and Process; Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies,” Virginia Law Review, 75, 2: 431–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Economics and Organization, 77 (March): 243–77.Google Scholar

McFaul, M. 1995. “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,” World Politics, 47, 2: 210–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMann, Kelly. 2003. “The Civic Realm in Kyrgyzstan: Soviet Economic Legacies and Activists' Expectations,” in Jones Luong, Pauline, ed. The Transformation of Central Asia: States and Societies from Soviet Rule to Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 213–45.Google Scholar

McMenamin, Iain, and Schoenman, Roger. 2004, “Political Competition: The Rule of Law and Corruption in Successful Post-Communist Countries,” Working Papers in International Studies, 7.Google Scholar

Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F. 1981. “Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5: 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendilow, Jonathan. 1992. “Public Party Funding and Party Transformation in Multiparty Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, 25, 1 (April): 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 2002. “Domestic Politics,” in Mesežnikov, Grigorij, Kollár, Miroslav, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 21–92.Google Scholar

Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 1997. “The Open-Ended Formation of Slovakia's Political Party System,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and John, Gould, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar

Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2006. “The Rise of the Partisan State? Parties, Patronage, and the Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 274–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, William, Grødeland, Ase, and Koshechkina, Tatyana. 2001. A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7: 213–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael, 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150/1: 171–95.Google Scholar

Moe, Terry, and Miller, Goney. 1983. “Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government,” American Political Science Review, 77: 297–323.Google Scholar

Montinola, Gabriella, and Jackman, Robert. 2002. “Source of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study,” British Journal of Political Science, 32, 1 (January): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, and Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2003. “National Interests, State Power and EU Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 4, 17, 1 (Winter): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morlino, Leonardo. 2001. “The Three Phases of Italian Parties,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunter, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar

Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, Fettelschoss, Katja, and Harst, Philipp, 2004. “Party Government in Central East European Democracies: A Data Collection (1990–2003),” European Journal of Political Research, 43: 869–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang. 2006. “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State,” in Richard, Katz, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politic. London: Sage, pp. 189–95.Google Scholar

Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. “Austrian Governmental Institutions: Do They Matter?” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass, pp. 99–131.Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar

Myerson, Roger. 1993. “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption,” Games and Economic Behavior, 5: 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nello, Susan Senior. 2001. “The Role of the IMF,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nørgaard, Ole, Ostrovska, Ilze, and Hansen, Ole Hersted. 2000. “State of the State in Post-Communist Latvia: State Capacity and Government Effectiveness in a Newly Independent Country.” Paper presented at the 2000 European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Joint Sessions, Copenhagen.

North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England,” Journal of Economic History, 49, 4 (December): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Novotný, Vít. 1999. “Deset lat po listopadu: Omězme Moc české Politické Oligarchie,” Britské Listy, 29 November.

Nunberg, Barbara. 2000. “Ready for Europe: Public Administration Reform and European Union Accession in Central and Eastern Europe.” World Bank Technical Paper No. 466. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Nunberg, Barbara, ed. 1999. The State After Communism. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Dwyer, Conor. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe,” World Politics: 520–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Dwyer, Conor. 2003. “Expanding the Post-Communist State? A Theory and Some Empirical Evidence.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (AAASS) Toronto, Canada.

O'Dwyer, Conor. 2002. “Civilizing the State Bureaucracy: The Unfulfilled Promise of Public Administration Reform in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic (1990–2000).” Occasional paper, Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post Soviet Studies.

OECD. 2001a. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Czech Republic–2000.

OECD. 2001b. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Hungry–2000.

Olson, David. 1998. “Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 432–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy and Development,” American Political Science Review, 87 (3 September): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neil, Patrick. 1998. Revolution from Within. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

O'Neil, Patrick. 1996. “Revolution from Within: Institutional Analysis, Transitions from Authoritarianisms, and the Case of Hungary,” World Politics, 48, 4 (July): 579–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neil, Patrick. 1993. “Presidential Power in Post-Communist Europe: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Communist Studies, 9, 3: 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Örkény, Antal, and Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1999. “Rules of Law: The Complexity of Legality in Hungary,” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Ost, David. 1991. “Shaping a New Politics in Poland.” Program on Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper Series, Center for European Studies (CES) Harvard University, No. 8.

Panków, Irena. 1991. “Przemiany środowiska społecznego Polaków w latach osiemdziesiatych,” Kultura i Społeczenstwo, 1: 53–65.Google Scholar

Parlamentní Zpravodaj. 1999. “Jakě jsou klady a zapory aktualního navrhu novely zakona o politických stranach” [What are the bases for the current proposal for the novelization of the law on political parties].

Pempel, T. J. 2000. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. 1998. Political Participation and Government Regulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Perkins, Doug. 1996. “Structure and Choice: The Role of Organizations, Patronage, and the Media in Party Formation,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, , and Guido, . 2002. Political Economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2001. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Manuscript, June.

Petroff, Włodzimierz. 1996. Finansowanie partii politycznych w postkomunistycznej Europie [The financing of political parties in Europe]. Warsaw: Polish Parliamentary Bureau of Analyses and Expertise.Google Scholar

Pettai, Vello. 1997. “Political Stability Through Disenfranchisement,” Transition, 3, 6 (4 April).Google Scholar

Pettai, Vello, and Kreuzer, Marcus. 2001. “Institutions and Party Development in the Baltic States,” in Lewis, Paul, ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 107–25.Google Scholar

PHARE and NVF. 1998. “An Analysis of Public Administration of the Czech Republic.” Summary Report, Prague, September.

Piattoni, Simona. 2001. “Introduction,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierre, Jon, Svasand, Lars, and Widfeldt, Anders. 2000. “State Subsidies to Political Parties: Confronting Rhetoric with Reality,” West European Politics, 23, 2 (July): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael. 1985. “How Can Money in Politics Be Assessed?” Paper presented at the International Political Science Conference Paris.

Plakans, Andrejs. 1998. “Democratization and Political Participation in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of Latvia,” in Dawish, Karen, and Parott, Bruce, eds. The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Plasser, Fritz, Ulram, Peter, and Grausgruber, Alfred. 1992. “The Decline of ‘Lager Mentality’ and the New Model of Electoral Competition in Austria,” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Protsyk, Oleh. 2003. Reforming Cabinets in Post-Communist Countries: Political Determinants of Cabinet Organization and Size. Manuscript, University of Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense,” in Shapiro, Ian, and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, eds. Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1997. “The State in a Market Economy,” in Nelson, Joan, Tilly, Charles, and Walker, Lee, eds. Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies. Washington: National Academy Press, pp. 411–31.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1990. The State and the Economy Under Capitalism. London: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pujas, Véronique, and Rhodes, Martin. 1999. “Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain, and France,” West European Politics, 22, 3: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raiser, Martin, Di Tommaso, Maria, and Weeks, Melvyn. 2000. “The Measurement and Determinants of Institutional Change: Evidence from Transition Economies.” EBRD Working Paper No. 60.

Reed, Quentin. 2002. “Corruption in Czech Privatization: The Dangers of ‘Neo-Liberal’ Privatization,” in Kotkin, Stephen, and Sajos, Andras, eds. Political Corruption: A Skeptic's Handbook. Budapest: CEU Press, pp. 261–86.Google Scholar

Reed, Quentin. 1996. Political Corruption, Privatization and Control in the Czech Republic. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oxford University.

Regulski, Jerzy. 1999. “Building Democracy in Poland: The State Reform of 1998.” Discussion Paper 9, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Remington, Thomas, and Smith, Steven. 1996. “Institutional Design, Uncertainty, and Path Dependency During Transition,” American Journal of Political Science 40, 4: 1253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, Eric. 1992. “Public Administration in Post-Socialist Eastern Europe,” Public Administration Review, 52, 2 (March/April): 116–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Bradley. 2001. “Japan's ‘1995 System’ and Beyond,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar

Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting,” American Political Science Review, 62: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, James, and Verdier, Therry. 2002. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Centre for Economic Policy Discussion Paper Series No. 3205.

Roland, Gerard. 2001. “Ten Years After … Transition and Economics.” IMF Staff Papers, No. 48. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar

Róna-Tas, Ákos. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1978. Corruption. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Roubini, Nouriel, and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1989. “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Economies.” NBER Working Papers No. 2919, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Rus, Andrej. 1996. “Quasi Privatization: From Class Struggle to a Scuffle of Small Particularisms,” in Benderly, Jill, and Kraft, Evan, eds. Independent Slovenia: Origins, Movements, Prospects. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 225–50.Google Scholar

Rybář, Marek. 2006. “Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rydlewski, Grzegorz. 2000. Rządzenie Koalicyjne w Polsce. Warsaw: Elipsa.Google Scholar

Sadurski, Wojciech, ed. 2002. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Sajo, Andras. 1998a. “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of the Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” East European Constitutional Review, 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol7num2.Google Scholar

Sajo, Andras. 1998b. “How the Rule of Law Can Facilitate the Spread of Sleaze,” East European Constitutional Review. 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.ngu.edu/eecr/vol7num 2.Google Scholar

Samuels, David. 2001. “Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies,” Comparative Politics, 34, 1 (October): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scarrow, Susan. 2002. “Parties Without Members?” in Dalton, Russell, and Wattenberg, Martin, eds. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schamis, Hector E. 2002. Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997a. “Government Employment and Pay in Global Perspective.” Washington: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1771.

Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997b. “An International Statistical Survey of Government Employment and Wages.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1806.

Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2002. “Democracy by Judiciary.” Paper presented at the conference. Rethinking the Rule of Law in Post-Communist Europa: Past Legacies, Institutional Innovations, and Constitutional Discourses, EUI, Florence, 22–3 February.

Scherpereel, John. 2003. “Appreciating the Third Player: The European Union and the Politics of Civil Service Reform in East Central Europe.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association (APSA), Philadelphia, 28–31 August.

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1948. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Scott, James. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. 1998. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1993. “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SIGMA. 2002a. “Bulgaria: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”

SIGMA. 2002b. “Czech Republic: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”

SIGMA 2002c. “Latvia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”

SIGMA. 2002d. “Slovakia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”

SIGMA. 1999. Public Management Profiles of Central and East European Countries: Estonia. October.

Sikk, Allan. 2006. “From Private Organizations to Democratic Infrastructure: Political Parties and the State in Estonia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics, 22, 3 (September): 341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sikk, Allan. 2003. “A Cartel Party System in a Post-Communist Country? The Case of Estonia.” Paper prepared for the European Constitution for Political Review (ECPR) General Conference, 18–21 September, Marborg, Germany.

Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1983. “Political Change and Political Accountability: A Propositional Inventory of Causes and Effects,” in Daalder, Hans, and Peter, Mair, eds. West European Party Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Skach, Cindy, and Stepan, Alfred. 1993. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism Versus Presidentialism,” World Politics, 46, 1: 1–22.Google Scholar

Slovak Government Information Service. 2000. “Audit súladu činností a financovania ústredných orgánov štátnej správy” [Audit of the activities and finances of the central institutions of public administration]. August. Also available at http://www.vlada.gov.sk/INFOSERVIs/.

Slovak Government Information Service. 1999. “Analysis of the Inherited State of the Economy and Society.”

Smith, David, Pabriks, Artis, Purs, Aldis, and Lane, Thomas. 2002. The Baltic States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, Karen. 2001. “The Promotion of Democracy,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar

Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama, and Ishiyama, John. 2000. “Judicious Choices: Designing Courts in Post-Communist Politics,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33: 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snipe, Arta. 2003. Financing of Political Parites: Effectiveness of Regulation. The Latvian Example. Master's Thesis, Riga Graduate School of Law, Riga, Latvia.

Spar, Deborah. 1994. The Cooperative Edge: The Internal Politics of International Cartels. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Spruyt, Hendrik. 1992. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Staniszkis, Jadwiga. 1999. Post-Socialism. Warsaw: PAN.Google Scholar

Stark, David, and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, Jonathan. 1998. “Still in Bed Together.” New Presence (January). Available at http://www.new-presence.in.

Stepan, Alfred. 1994. “Corruption in South America,” in Trang, Due, ed. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEU.Google Scholar

Stigler, George. 1975. The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stigler, George. 1972. “Economic Competition and Political Competition,” Public Choice, 13: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroehlein, Andrew. 1999. “The Czech Republic 1992 to 1999,” Central Europe Review. (13 September). Available at http://www.ce-review:org.

Strøm, Kaare. 2000. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, 37: 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Strøm, Kaare. 1989. “Inter-Party Competition in Advanced Democracies,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 3: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suleiman, Ezra N. 2003. Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Swaniewiuz, Pawet. 2004. Consolidation or Fragmentation? Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Szabó, Gábor. 1993. “Administrative Transition in a Post-Communist Society: The Case of Hungary,” Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Szczerbak, Aleks. 2006. “State Party Funding and Patronage in Post-1989 Poland,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szelenyi, Ivan, and Szelenyi, Sonya. 1991. “The Vacuum in Hungarian Politics: Classes and Parties,” New Left Review (May–June): 121–37.Google Scholar

Szoboszlai, György, 1985a. “Bureaucracy and Social Control,” in Szoboszlai, György, ed. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Szoboszlai, György, ed. 1985b. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Szomolányi, Soňa. 1997. “Identifying Slovakia's Emerging Regime,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 1990. “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer They Rise, the Slower They Fall,’” in Pempol, T. J ., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 306–32.Google Scholar

Terra, Jonathan. 2002. “Political Institutions and Post Communist Transitions.” Paper prepared for the Fourth Annual Society for Comparative Research Graduate Student Retreat, Budapest, May.

Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tisenkopfs, Tālis, and Kalniņš, Valts. 2002. “Public Accountability Procedures in Politics in Latvia.” Report, Baltic Studies Center, Riga, Latvia, February.

Todorova, Rossitsa. 2001. “EU Integration as an Agent of Public Administration Reform.” Unpublished Manuscript, American University in Bulgaria.

Toonen, Theo. 1993. “Analysing Institutional Change,” in Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Torres-Bartyzel, Claudia, and Kacprowicz, Grażyna. 1999. “The National Civil Service System in Poland,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 159–83.Google Scholar

Trang, Duc, ed. 1994. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEN Press.Google Scholar

Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of Public Economics, 76: 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treisman, Daniel. 1998. “Dollars and Democratization: The Role and Power of Money in Russia's Transitional Elections,” Comparative Politics, 31, 1 (October): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tullock, Gordon. 1967. “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft,” Western Economic Journal, 5: 224–32.Google Scholar

Turner, Arthur. 1993. “Postauthoritarian Elections: Testing Expectations about ‘First’ Elections,”Comparative Political Studies, 26, 3 (October): 330–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

USAID public opinion poll. 1999. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty broadcast, Slovakia, 10 November.

Úsek pro Reformu Veřejné správy. [Section for the Reform of the Public Administration]. 2001. “Vybrané výstupy z projekty PHARE CZ 9808.01 Posílení institucionálních a administrativních kapacit pro implementaci acquis communautaire.” Prague.

Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanagunas, Stan. 1997. “Civil Service Reform in the Baltics.” Paper presented for conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University Bloomington, 5–8 April.

Biezen, Ingrid. 2004. “Political Parties as Public Utilities,” Party Politics, 10, 6: 701–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biezen, Ingrid. 2000. “Party Financing in New Democracies,” Party Politics, 6, 3: 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biezen, Ingrid, and Kopecký, Petr. 2001. “On the Predominance of State Money: Reassessing Party Financing in the New Democracies of Southern and Eastern Europe,” Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 2, 3: 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vass, Lászlo. 1994. “Changes in Hungary's Governmental System,” in Ágh, Attila, ed. The Emergence of West Central European Parliaments: The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies, pp. 186–97.Google Scholar

Verheijen, Tony. 2002. “The European Union and Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Baker, Randall, ed. Transitions from Authoritarianism: The Role of the Bureaucracy. London: Praeger.Google Scholar

Verheijen, Tony. 1999. “The Civil Service of Bulgaria: Hope on the Horizon,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 92–130.Google Scholar

Vinton, Lucy. 1993. Poland's New Election Law: Fewer Parties, Same Impasse? RFE/RL Report (8 July): 7–17.Google Scholar

Vládní program boje proti korupci v Česke Republice. [Government program for the fight against corruption in the Czech Republic]. 1998. “Zpráva o korupci v České republice a možnostech účinného postupu proti tomut negativnímu společenskému jevu.” [Report about corruption in the Czech Republic and the possibilities of an active approach against this negative social development], 17 February.

Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walecki, Marcin, ed. 2002. Finansowanie Polityki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar

Warner, Carolyn. 2001. “Mass Parties and Clientelism: France and Italy,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasilewski, Jacek, 2000. “Polish Post-Transitional Elite,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. Warsaw: PAN ISP. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe.Google Scholar

Waterbury, John. 1973. “Endemic and Planned Corruption in a Monarchical Regime,” World Politics, 25, 4 (July): 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max. 1947. Wirtschaft und Gesellshaft. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law,” American Political Science Review, 91 (June): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry, and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1: 132–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winiecki, Jan. 1996. “Impediments to Institutional Change in the Former Soviet System,” in Alston, Lee., eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

World Bank. 1999. Corruption in Poland: Review of Priority Areas and Proposals for Action. Warsaw: World Bank.

Zemanovičová, Daniela, and Sičáková, xsEmília. 2001. “Transparency and Corruption,” in Mesežnikov, Miroslav, Grigorij, Kollár, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 537–52.Google Scholar

Zielonka, Jan. 1994. “New Institutions in the Old East Bloc,” Journal of Democracy, 5: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Žižmond, Egon. 1993. “Slovenia–One Year of Independence,” Europe-Asia Studies, 45, 5: 887–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zuckerman, Alan. 1979. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption,” American Economic Review, 89, 4 (September): 982–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1995. “Competition and Corruption.” Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 169. Oxford University.

Ágh, Attila, ed. 1994. The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center of Democracy Studies.Google Scholar

Ágh, Attila, and Kurtán, Sándor. 1996. “‘Parliaments’ and ‘Organized Interests’ in Civil Society: Local Government Legislation and Elections in Hungary (1990–1995),” in Ágh, Attila, and Ilonszki, Gabriella, eds. Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies.Google Scholar

Ákos, Róna-Tas. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Albats, Yevgenia. 2003. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2005. “Informal Politics and Challenges to Democracy: Administrative Resource in Kuchma's Ukraine.” Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.

Amsden, Alice, Kochanowicz, Jacek, and Taylor, Lance. 1994. The Market Meets Its Match. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ansell, Christopher, and Burris, Arthur. 1997. “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development, 11 (Spring): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2001. “Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle,” East European Politics and Societies, 15, 3: 528–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arian, Alan, and Barnes, Samuel. 1974. “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability,” Journal of Politics, 36, 1: 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auers, Daunis. 2002/2003. “Latvia's 2002 Elections: Dawn of a New Era?” East European Constitutional Review, 11/12, 4/1 (Fall/Winter): 106–10.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar

Baldersheim, Harald, et al. 1996. “New Institutions of Local Government: A Comparison,” in Baldersheim, Harald, Illner, Michal, Offerdal, Audun, Rose, Lawrence, and Swaniewicz, Paweł, eds. Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Andrew. 2003. “Comparative Theft: Context and Choice in the Hungarian Czech, and Russian Transformations 1989–2000,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 3: 533–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, David. 1996. “Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilization Policy in Hungary,” Europe-Asia Studies, 48, 1: 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 1999–2000. “Collusion, Competition, and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 4: 435–70; 12, 1: 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 2002. “Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems,” in Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan, eds. Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barzelay, Michael. 1997. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing,” Governance, 10, 3: 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar

Bendor, Jonathan, Glazer, A., Hammond, T. 2001. “Theories of Delegation,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Colin. 1997. “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, 10, 3: 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change,” Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Hayden, Jacqueline. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989–2001,” Journal of Politics, 66, 2: 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bercík, Peter, and Nemec, Juraj. 1999. “The Civil Service System of the Slovak Republic,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar

Bernhard, Michael. 2000. “Institutional Choice After Communism,” East European Politics and Societies, 3: 316–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bielasiak, Jack. 1983. “The Party: Permanent Crisis,” in Brumberg, Abraham, ed. Poland: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Birch, Sarah. 2002. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Birch, Sarah. 2001. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 30 August–2 September 2001, San Francisco.

Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2005. “Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization,” Comparative Political Studies, 38, 8 (October): 915–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruszt, Laszlo, and Stark, David. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition,” Journal of International Affairs, 45, 1 (Summer): 201–45.Google Scholar

Brym, Robert, and Gimpelson, Vladimir. 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s,” Slavic Review, 63, 1: 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1963. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bugaric, Bojan. 2005. “The Europeanization of National Administrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Creating Formal Structures Without Substance?” Paper prepared for the Apres Enlargement Workshop, EUI, Florence, 29–30 April.

Bukowska, Xymena, and Czesnik, Mikołaj. 2002. “Analiza Treści Programów Wyborczych,” in Markowski, Radoslaw, ed. System Partyjny I Zachowania Wyborcze. Warsaw: ISP PAN.Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 1999. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism,” Slavic Review 58, 4: 756–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4 October): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carey, John. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

CBOS. 2000. “Finansowanie partii politycznych.” Komunikat z badań (Fall).

Cekota, Jaromir, Gönenç, Rauf, and Kwang-Yeol Yoo. 2002. “Strengthening the Management of Public Spending in Hungary,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 336 (30 July).

Center for Study of Democracy. 2004. Brief. Bulgaria Sofia (July). Available at http://www.csd.bg, accessed 19 November 2004.

Čigāne, Lolita. 2002. “A Reflection of the Shortcomings in Legislation on Party Financing in the 2001 Finance Declarations.” Soros Foundation Latvia and Transparency International “delna,” Riga Latvia (April). Available at http://www.politika.lv.

Cirtautas, Arista. 1995. “The Post-Leninist State: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28, 4: 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colazingari, Silvia, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America,” Political Science Quarterly, 113, 3: 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Research Note: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3: 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colomer, Josep. 1995. “Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comisso, Ellen. 1986. “State Structures, Political Processes, and Collective Choice in CMEA States,” in Comisso, Ellen, and Tyson, Laura D'Andrea, eds. Power, Purpose, and Collective Choice: Economic Strategy in Socialist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 2001. “Political Darwinism in Latin America's Lost Decade,” in Larry, Diamond, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar

Coppedge, Michael. 1993. “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 1 (April): 253–74.Google Scholar

Cotta, Maurizio. 1996. “Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilising Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crenson, Matthew, and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2004. Downsizing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Crombrugghe, Alain de. 1997. “Wage and Pension Pressure on the Polish Budget.” Report for World Bank Project RPO 678–96, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1793.

Czabański, Krzysztof. 2003. “Rywin TV.” Wprost, 26 October.

Dallek, Robert. 1998. Flawed Giant: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1960–1973. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1974. “Need for Achievement and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Party Success in Elections and Coalitions,” American Political Science Review, 68, 3: 1207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. “Political Parties and Corruption: 17 Hypotheses on the Interactions Between Parties and Corruption.” EUI Working Papers RSC 2000/60, European University Institute, Fiesole, San Domenico, Italy.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Meny, Yves, eds. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 516–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. “Establishing Party Dominance,” in Pempel, T. J., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 2000. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies,” Journal of Economic Theory, 94: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dnitrova, Zoya. 2002. Financing Election Campaigns. Unpublished Manuscript. Ljabljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1965. Political Parties. New York: Wiley and Sons, p. 308.Google Scholar

Dyson, Kenneth. 1977. “Party, State, and Bureaucracy in Western Germany.” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01-063. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

East European Constitutional Review. 2001. (Winter). Available at http://www.balticsworldwide.com/wkcrier/0301_0322_99.htm, accessed February 9, 2006. RFE/RL OMRI Daily Digest Report, 29 July 1996.

Ekiert, Grzegorz. 2001. The State After State Socialism: Poland in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Zielonka, Jan. 2003. “Introduction: Academic Boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU's Eastward Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1 (Winter): 7–23.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Party Politics in Post-Communist Transition,” in Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Enyedi, Zsolt. 2003. “Cleavage Formation in Hungary: The Role of Agency.” Paper presented at the 2003 Joint Sessions of the ECPR Edinburgh.

Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Organizing a Sub-Cultural Party in Eastern Europe,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, David, and O'Halloryn, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion,” American Journal of Political Science, 38/3: 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Union Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: EU.

Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eyal, Gil, Szelényi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fainsod, Merle. 1953. How Russia Is Ruled. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 30: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fidrmuc, Jan, Fidrmuc, Jarko, and Horvath, Julius. 2002. “Visegrad Economies: Growth Experience and Prospects.” GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic Growth.

Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. “The Politics of Property Rights,” American Political Science Review, 89, 4: 867–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World,” East European Politics and Societies, 12: 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

House, Freedom. 2002. Nations in Transit, 2001. Washington: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Frič, Pavol. 1999. Korupce na český způsob. Prague: G Plus G.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl, and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Frydman, Roman, Murphy, Kenneth, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1998. Capitalism with a Comrade's Face. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization,” World Politics, 54 (April), pp. 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30: 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganev, Venelin. 2005. Preying on the State: State Formation in Post-Communist Bulgaria (1989–1997). Unpublished Manuscript.

Ganev, Venelin. 2000. “Post-Communism as a Historical Episode of State Building, or Explaining the Weakness of the Post-Communist State.” Paper presented at the twelfth International Conference of Europeanists Chicago, March.

Gazsó, Ferenc. 1992. “Cadre Bureaucracy and the Intelligentsia,” Journal of Communist Studies (September): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1994. The Politician's Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly, 4: 641–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Treisman, Daniel. 2002. “Fiscal Games and Public Employment,” World Politics, 54: 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, Klaus H. 2001. “Making Sense of Post-Communist Central Administration: Modernization Europeanization or Latinization?” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1032–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetz, Klaus, and Margetts, Helen. 1999. “The Solitary Center: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe,” Governance, 12, 4 (October): 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics, 53: 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsmith, Arthur. 1999. “Africa's Overgrown State Reconsidered,” World Politics, 4: 520–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Government of the Czech Republic. 1998. “Programové prohlašení Vlády České Republiky” [Programmatic declaration of the Government of the Czech Republic] (27 January). Available at http://www.vlada.cz/ASC/urad/historie/vlada98/dokumenty/progrprohl.il2.htm.

Government of the Republic of Slovakia. 2001. “Správa o boji proti korupcii na Slovensku.” [Report of the Slovak government]. October. Available at http://www.government.gov.sk, accessed 23 November 2002.

Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion, and Diversity,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, Kenneth. 2004. Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Gros, Daniel, and Suhcrke, Marc. 2000. “Ten Years After: What Is Special About Transition Countries?” EBRD Working Paper No. 56, August.

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State.” Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Ideas in Post-Communist Politics: A Re-Evaluation Havighurst Center, Luxembourg, 5–9 July.

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10 (December): 1123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. 2003. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Communist State,” Politics and Society, 30, 4 (December): 529–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

György, Istvan. 1999. “The Civil Service System of Hungary,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 131–58.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar

Hadenius, Stig. 1985. Swedish Politics During the 20th Century. Boras: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József. 1999. “Hungarian Local Government,” in Emil, Kirchner, ed., Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael, and Levine, Victor, eds. 1989. Political Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 2 (January): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellman, Joel, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economics,” Finance and Development, 38, 3 (September).Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2444.

Hendley, Katherine. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrera, Yoshiko. 2001. “Russian Economic Reform 1991–1998,” in Barany, Zoltan, and Moser, Robert, eds. Challenges to Democratic Transition In Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesse, Joachim Jens. 1993. “From Transformation to Modernization: Administrative Change in Central and Eastern Europe,” in idem. ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heywood, Paul. 1997. “Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirszowicz, Maria. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar

Hojnacki, William. 1996. “Politicization as a Civil Service Dilemma,” in Bekke, Hans, Perry, James, and Toonen, Theo, eds. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 137–64.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse: Probing the Post-Communist Dilemma,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed. Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economic and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Stockholm: Swedish School of Economics.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Shale, and Petréš, Martin. 2003. “Pride and Prejudice in Prague: Understanding Early Policy Error and Belsteol Reform in Czech Economic Transition,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 2: 231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horráth, Tamás, ed. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Hough, Jerry. 1969. The Soviet Prefects. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hough, Jerry, and Fainsod, Merle. 1979. How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchcroft, Paul. 1998. Booty Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Ichino, Nahomi. 2006. Thugs and Voters: Political Tournaments in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Ikstens, Jānis, Smilov, Daniel, and Walecki, Marcin. 2002. “Campaign Finance in Central and Eastern Europe,” IFES Reports (April). Washington: IFES.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2002. “A Functional Clarification of Parliamentary Committees in Hungary, 1990–1998,” in Olson, David, and Crowther, William, eds. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2000. “The Second Generation Political Elite in Hungary: Partial Consolidation,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe. Warsaw: PAN ISP.Google Scholar

Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1998. “Representation Deficit in a New Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Hungarian Case,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 14: 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

INEKO for the Slovak Government. 2000. “Zaverečná správa o výsledkoch a odporučaniach audity súladu činnosti a financovania úsredných orgánov štátnej správy,” August.

Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Post-Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery,” Comparative Politics, 35, 1: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Monetary Fund. 1999. Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, August 1999/March 2000.

Ishiyama, John. 1997. “Transitional Electoral Systems in Post-Communist Eastern Europe,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pildes, Richard. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process,” Stanford Law Review (February): 642–717.Google Scholar