Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:48:08.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jon Mandle
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rawls's 'A Theory of Justice'
An Introduction
, pp. 201 - 206
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A Study in the Grounds of Ethical Knowledge (PhD Dissertation, Princeton University, 1950).
A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, 1971; rev. edn, 1999) (text citations to TJ).
“John Rawls: For the Record,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy (spring, 1991).
Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, 1993; expanded edn, 2005) (text citations to PL).
Collected Papers, Freeman, Samuel, ed. (Harvard University Press, 1999).
The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press, 1999).
Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Herman, Barbara, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2000).
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Kelly, Erin, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2001).
“Afterword: A Reminiscence” in Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Floyd, Juliet and Shieh, Sanford, eds. (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRef
Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Freeman, Samuel, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2007).
A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: With “On My Religion,” Nagel, Thomas, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2009).
Symposium on the Reception of Rawls in Europe,” European Journal of Political Theory, 1 (2002).
Barry, Brian, The Liberal Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Blocker, H. Gene and Smith, Elizabeth H., eds., John Rawls's Theory of Social Justice (Ohio University Press, 1980).
Daniels, Norman, ed., Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' ‘A Theory of Justice’ (Stanford University Press, 1989).
Freeman, Samuel, Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Freeman, SamuelRawls (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Kukathas, Chandran and Pettit, Philip, Rawls: “A Theory of Justice” and its Critics (Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Mandle, Jon, What's Left of Liberalism? An Interpretation and Defense of Justice as Fairness (Lexington Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Martin, Rex, Rawls and Rights (Kansas University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, Realizing Rawls (Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Pogge, ThomasJohn Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Henry and Weithman, Paul, eds., The Philosophy of Rawls: A Collection of Essays, 5 vols. (Garland, 1999).
Talisse, Robert, On Rawls (Wadsworth, 2001).Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul, Understanding Rawls: A Reconciliation and Critique of “A Theory of Justice” (Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
“The Good of Justice as Fairness,” Times Literary Supplement, May 5, 1972.
“Rawls is Given Two Awards for Book on Justice Theory,” The Harvard Crimson, December 7, 1972, www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=245388.
Ackerman, Bruce, “Political Liberalisms,” The Journal of Philosophy, 91 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, “What is the Point of Equality?Ethics, 109 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard, “Against ‘Complex Equality’” in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Miller, David and Walzer, Michael, eds. (Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin, The Conquest of Politics (Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Barry, Brian, “Political Argument after Twenty-Five Years: An Introduction to the Reissue” in Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction (University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth, “Ethos and Institutions: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 37 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Lawrence, “Against the Supposed Difference between Historical and End-State Theories,” Philosophical Studies, 41 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, “Does Political Theory Still Exist?” in Laslett, and Runciman, , Philosophy, Politics and Society (second series).
Brandt, Richard, A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Clark, Barry and Gintis, Herbert, “Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7 (1978).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., “Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: How Patterns Preserve Liberty” [1977] in Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A.On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics, 99 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Incentives, Inequality, and Community,” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 13, Peterson, Grethe, ed. (University of Utah Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A.If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Expensive Taste Rides Again” in Dworkin and His Critics, Burley, Justine, ed. (Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, “Book Review of Spheres of Justice,” The Journal of Philosophy, 83 (1986).Google Scholar
Cohen, JoshuaDemocratic Equality,” Ethics, 99 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, JoshuaTaking People as They Are?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua “For a Democratic Society” in Freeman, The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.
Cohen, JoshuaThe Importance of Philosophy: Reflections on John Rawls,” South African Journal of Philosophy, 32 (2004).Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall, “Review of A Theory of Justice,” New York Times Book Review, July 16, 1972.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, “The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy” [1917] in The Essential Dewey, vol. I, Hickman, Larry and Alexander, Thomas, eds. (Indiana University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dewey, John, “Experience, Knowledge and Value: A Rejoinder” [1939] in The Philosophy of John Dewey, Schilpp, Paul and Hahn, Lewis, eds., 3rd edn. (Open Court, 1989).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “John Rawls,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 11 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberle, Christopher, Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens (Russell Sage Foundation, 1992).Google Scholar
English, Jane, “Justice between Generations,” Philosophical Studies, 31 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David, “Liberalism, Equality, and Fraternity in Cohen's Critique of Rawls,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, “Congruence and the Good of Justice” in Freeman, Justice and the Social Contract.
Freeman, Samuel “Rawls and Luck Egalitarianism” in Freeman, Justice and the Social Contract.
Freeman, SamuelFrontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach vs. Contractarianism,” Texas Law Review, 85 (2006).Google Scholar
Fried, Barbara, “Wilt Chamberlain Revisited: Nozick's ‘Justice in Transfer’ and the Problem of Market-Based Distribution,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William, Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David, Moral by Agreement (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gray, John, “Contractarian Method, Private Property and the Market Economy” in Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy (Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
Gregory, Eric, “Before the Original Position: The Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls,” Journal of Religious Ethics, 35 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Life-Forms, Morality and the Task of the Philosopher” [1984] in Autonomy and Solidarity, rev. edn., Dews, Peter, ed. (Verso, 1992).Google Scholar
Habermas, JürgenMoral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Lenhardt, Christian and Nicholsen, Shierry Weber, trans. (MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, “Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?Journal of Philosophy, 77 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, R. M., “Rawls' Theory of Justice” [1973] in Daniels, Reading Rawls.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. “Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism” in Utilitarianism and Beyond, Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, eds. (Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John, “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory” [1975] in Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation (D. Reidel, 1976).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority” [1973] in Daniels, , Reading Rawls.
Hart, H. L. A. “Between Utility and Rights” [1979] in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals [1797], Gregor, Mary, trans. (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kearns, Deborah, “A Theory of Justice and Love – Rawls on the Family,” Politics, 16 (1987).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine, “The Reasons We Can Share” [1993] in Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Krouse, Richard and McPherson, Michael, “Capitalism, ‘Property-Owning Democracy,’ and the Welfare State” in Democracy and the Welfare State, Gutmann, Amy, ed. (Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles, The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter, Introduction in Laslett, Philosophy, Politics and Society.
Laslett, Peter, ed., Philosophy, Politics and Society (Blackwell, 1956).
Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G., eds., Philosophy, Politics and Society (second series), (Blackwell, 1964).
Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government [1690], Laslett, Peter, ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 2nd edn (Notre Dame, 1984).Google Scholar
Mandle, Jon, “Having It Both Ways: Justification and Application in Justice as Fairness,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 75 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandle, JonJustice, Desert, and Ideal Theory,” Social Theory and Practice, 23 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandle, JonThe Reasonable in Justice as Fairness,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 29 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. E., Liberty, Equality and Efficiency (New York University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S., Considerations on Representative Government in On Liberty and Other Essays, Gray, John, ed. (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Millgram, Elijah, Ethics Done Right: Practical Reasoning as a Foundation for Moral Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen and Adam, Smith, Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edn. (Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Thomas, Nagel, “Rawls on Justice” [1973] in Daniels, Reading Rawls.Google Scholar
Thomas, Nagel “Libertarianism without Foundations” [1975] in Reading Nozick: Essays on “Anarchy, State, and Utopia,” Paul, Jeffrey, ed. (Blackwell, 1981).Google Scholar
Thomas, NagelMortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Thomas, Nagel “Rawls and Liberalism” in Freeman, The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.
Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Okin, Susan, Justice, Gender and the Family (Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Parekh, B., “Reflections on Rawls's Theory of Justice,” Political Studies, 20 (1972).Google Scholar
Partridge, P. H., “Politics, Philosophy, Ideology,” Political Studies, 9 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, “On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and Murphy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ron, Amit, “Visions of Democracy in ‘Property-Owning Democracy’: Skelton to Rawls and Beyond,” History of Political Thought, 29 (2008).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy” [1988] in Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, vol. I (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality” [1993] in Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, vol. III (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Sachs, David, “How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Robert, “Faculty Shelves Draft Resolution after Debating for Hour and Half,” The Harvard Crimson, January 11, 1967, www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=270764.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael, “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self,” Political Theory, 12 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, MichaelDemocracy's Discontent (Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Sandel, MichaelLiberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, Walter, “Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, “What is Egalitarianism?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel “Is the Basic Structure Basic?” in The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, Sypnowich, Christine, ed. (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Adina, “Moral Neutrality and Primary Goods,” Ethics, 83 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter, “Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium,” The Monist, 58 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael, The Moral Problem (Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar
Smith, Paul, “Incentives and Justice: G. A. Cohen's Egalitarian Critique of Rawls,” Social Theory and Practice, 24 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, David, “Full Information Accounts of Well-Being,” Ethics, 104 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parijs, Philippe, “Difference Principles” in Freeman, The Cambridge Companion to Rawls.
Walzer, Michael, “Philosophy and Democracy,” Political Theory, 9 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, MichaelSpheres of Justice (Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael‘Spheres of Justice’: An Exchange,” New York Review of Books, July 21, 1983.Google Scholar
Weldon, T. D., “Political Principles” in Laslett, Philosophy, Politics and Society.
Williams, Andrew, “Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard, “A Fair State,” London Review of Books, May 13, 1993.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State (Stanford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan “John Rawls: Liberal Democracy Restated” in Liberal Democracy and Its Critics, Carter, April and Stokes, Geoffrey, eds. (Polity, 1998).Google Scholar
Wolff, JonathanFairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas, “The Role of Religion in Decision and Discussion of Political Issues” in Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate, Audi, Robert and Wolterstorf, Nicholasf, eds. (Rowman and Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany
  • Book: Rawls's 'A Theory of Justice'
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814099.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany
  • Book: Rawls's 'A Theory of Justice'
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814099.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jon Mandle, State University of New York, Albany
  • Book: Rawls's 'A Theory of Justice'
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814099.008
Available formats
×