Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Questions
  • Cited by 13
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The view that questions are 'requests for missing information' is too simple when language use is considered. Formally, utterances are questions when they are syntactically marked as such, or by prosodic marking. Functionally, questions request that certain information is made available in the next conversational turn. But functional and formal questionhood are independent: what is formally a question can be functionally something else, for instance, a statement, a complaint or a request. Conversely, what is functionally a question is often expressed as a statement. Also, verbal signals such as eye-gaze, head-nods or even practical actions can serve information-seeking functions that are very similar to the function of linguistic questions. With original cross-cultural and multidisciplinary contributions from linguists, anthropologists, psychologists and conversation analysts, this book asks what questions do and how a question can shape the answer it evokes.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Agar, M. and Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews. Discourse Processes, 5(1), 1–32.
Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Antaki, C., Houtkoup-Steenstra, H. and Rapley, M. (2000). “Brilliant. Next question …” Highgrade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(3), 235–262.
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Baldwin, D. A. and Moses, L. J. (1996). The ontogeny of social information gathering. Child Development, 67(5), 1915–1939.
Bangerter, A. and Clark, H. H. (2003). Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cognitive Science, 27, 195–225.
Bar-Hillel, Y. and Carnap, R. (1953). An outline of a Theory of Semantic Information.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4(14) (August), 147–157.
Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L. and Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52, 566–580.
Beaver, D. and Clark, B. Z. (2008). Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 180–191.
Berlyne, D. E. and Frommer, F. D. (1966). Some determinants of the incidence and content of children’s questions. Child Development, 37(1), 177–189.
Bertinetto, P. M. and Caldognetto, E. (1993). Ritmo e Intonazione. In A. A. Sobrero (ed.), Introduzione all’ Italiano contemporaneo (pp. 141–182). Bari: Laterza.
Bierwisch, M. (1980), Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In J. R. Searle, F.Kiefer and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, vol. X. Synthese Language Library: Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (pp. 1–35). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Birch, S. A. J., Vauthier, S. A. and Bloom, P. (2008). Three- and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107, 1018–1034.
Bishop, D. V. M., Chan, J., Hartley, J. and Weir, F. (1998). When a nod is as good as a word: Form-function relations between questions and their responses. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 415–432.
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.25) [Computer program]. Retrieved 20 January 2010, from www.praat.org/.
Bolinger, D. (1957). Interrogative structures of American English. Publications of the American Dialect Society, 28, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is predictable (if you’re a mind-reader). Language, 48, 633–644.
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
Bolinger, D. (1978a). Intonation across languages. In Universals of Human Language, vol. II: Phonology (pp. 471–524). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Bolinger, D. (1978b). Yes-no questions are not alternative questions. In Henry Hiz (ed.), Questions (pp. 87–105). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bolinger, D. (1982). Nondeclaratives from an intonational standpoint. In R. Schneider, K. Tuite and R. Chametzky (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclaratives. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford University Press.
Brouwer, D., Gerritsen, M. and De Haan, D. (1979). Speech differences between women and men. Language in Society, 8(1), 33–50.
Brown, P. (2010). Questions and their responses in Tzeltal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2627–2648.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (in preparation). Comparative response systems.
Bruck, M. and Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419–439.
Bussman, H. (1996). Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Button, G. and Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8(1), 3–55.
Button, G. and Casey, N. (1994). Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 167–190). Cambridge University Press.
Ceci, S. J. and Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439.
Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F. and Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children’s memory: Psychological implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 38–49.
Chisholm, W., Milic, L. T. and Greppin, J. A. C. (eds.) (1984). Interrogativity. A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology and Pragmatics of Questions in 7 Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chouinard, M. M. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 1–112.
Clancy, P. M. (1989). Form and function in the acquisition of Korean Wh-questions. Journal of Child Language, 16(2), 323–347.
Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing. Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet (pp. 243–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, H. H. (2004). Pragmatics of language performance. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 365–382). Oxford: Blackwell.
Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine and S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspective on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA Books.
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805.
Clark, H. H. and Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 62–81.
Clark, H. H. and Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. Webber and I. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. and Schaefer, E. R. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
Clark, H. H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
Clayman, S. E. (forthcoming). Address terms in action: The case of news interview discourse. Discourse and Communication.
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge University Press.
Cordón, I. M., Saetermoe, C. L. and Goodman, G. S. (2005). Facilitating children’s accurate responses: conversational rules and interview style. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 249–266.
Corriveau, K. H., Harris, P. L., Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Arnott, B., Elliott, L.et al. (2009). Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Development, 80, 750–761.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1996). The prosody of repetition: On quoting and mimicry. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies (pp. 366–405). Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization: The case of new beginnings. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and C. E. Ford (eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Curl, T. S. and Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153.
Cysouw, M. (2004). Interrogative Words – Lexical Typology. Berlin: ZAS talk.
Cysouw, M. (2007). Content interrogatives in Asheninca Campa: Corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of American Linguistics, 73(2), 133–164.
Davis, E. A. (1932). The form and function of children’s questions. Child Development, 3, 57–74.
De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H. and Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82(3), 515–535.
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in a courtroom cross examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. (1997). ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
Drew, P. (2003). Precision and exaggeration in interaction. American Sociological Review, 68, 1–22.
Drew, P. (2006). Misalignments in ‘after-hours’ calls to a British GP’s practice: A study in telephone medicine. In J. Heritage and D. Maynard (eds.), Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients (pp. 426–444). Cambridge University Press.
Dryer, M. S. (2008). Polar questions. In M. Haspelmat, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures. Online, Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 116. Available online at http://wals.info/feature/116. Retrieved 6 June 2008.
Duncan, S., Jr. and Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. New York: Wiley.
Egbert, M. and Vöge, M. (2008). German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why: wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 17–36.
Enfield, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 399–430). Oxford: Berg.
Enfield, N. J. (2007). A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Enfield, N. J. (2010). Questions and responses in Lao. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2649–2665.
Enfield, N. J. (2011). Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status knowledge and agency. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada and J. Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp. 285–312). Cambridge University Press.
Enfield, N., Stivers, T. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.) (2010). Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10): 2615–2619.
Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. New York: Wiley.
Fitneva, S. A. (2010). Children’s representation of child and adult knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(4), 420–447.
Fitneva, S. A. and Dunfield, K. A. (2010). Selective information seeking after a single encounter. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1380–1384.
Ford, B. A. and Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses to Wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 153–156.
Fusaro, M. and Harris, P. L. (2008). Children assess informant reliability using bystanders’ non-verbal cues. Developmental Science, 11(5), 771–777.
Geluykens, R. (1988). On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(2), 483–494.
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M. and Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–342.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
Golato, A. (2002). German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(5), 547–571.
Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, 205–217.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–52.
Goody, E. (ed.) (1987). Questions and politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Gordon, D., and Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational Postulates. Paper presented at the CLS, Chicago.
Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Groenendijk, J. (1998). Questions in update semantics. In J. Hulstijn and A. Nijholt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (pp. 125–137). University of Twente: Proceedings TWLT13.
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1997). Questions. In J. van Benthem and H. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language (pp. 1055–1124). Amsterdam/Cambridge, MA: Elsevier/MIT.
Gundel, J. (1974). The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory, Ph.D. dissertation: University of Texas at Austin.
Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (pp. 47–57). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Gussenhoven, C. (2005). Transcription of Dutch intonation. In Prosodic Typology and Transcription: A Unified Approach. Oxford University Press.
Haakana, M. and Kurhila, S. (2009). Other-correction in everyday interaction: Some comparative aspects. In M. Haakana, M. Laakso and J. Lindström (eds.), Talk in Interaction. Comparative Dimensions (pp. 152–179). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Haan, J. (2001). Speaking of Questions: An Exploration of Dutch Question Intonation. Utrecht: LOT.
Halonen, M. (2008). Person reference as a device for constructing experiences as typical in group therapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen and I. Leudar (eds.), Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy (pp. 139–151). Cambridge University Press.
Halonen, M. and Sorjonen, M.-L. (2008). Using niin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker’s action as an exaggeration. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 37–53.
Hamblin, C.L. (1958). Questions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 36(3): 159–168.
Hamblin, C.L. (1971). Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria, 37: 130–155.
Harris, P. L. (2007). Commentary: Time for questions. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 113–120.
Hart, B. and Risley, T. (1992). American parenting of language-learning children: Persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1096–1105.
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. and Comrie, B. (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.
Heath, C. (1986). Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Hedberg, N. and Sosa, J. M. (2002). The prosody of questions in natural discourse. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 (pp. 275–278). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.
Hedberg, N., Sosa, J. M. and Fadden, L. (2004). Meanings and configurations of questions in English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 2004, Nara, Japan.
Heinemann, T. (2006). “Will you or can’t you?” Displaying entitlement in interrogative questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1081–1104.
Heinemann, T. (2008). Questions of accountability. Yes-no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discoveries Studies, 10(1), 55–71.
Henning, A., Striano, T. and Lieven, E. V. M. (2005). Maternal speech to infants at 1 and 3 months of age. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 519–536.
Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27(3), 291–334.
Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox and S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. (2010a). Epistemics in action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. MS, forthcoming in Research on Language and Social Interaction.
Heritage, J. (2010b). Questioning in medicine. In A. F. Freed and S. Ehrlich (eds.), ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse (pp. 42–68). New York: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.
Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
Heritage, J. and Roth, A. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(1), 1–60.
Heritage, J. and Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29.
Hermann, E. (1942). Probleme de frage. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Hirschberg, J. (2000). A corpus-based approach to the study of speaking style. In M. Horne (ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment (pp. 271–311). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hirst, D. (1981). Intonation et syntaxe: Une théorie contextuelle. In M. Rossi, A. Di Cristo, D. Hirst, P. Martin and Y. Nishinuma (eds.), L’Intonation. De l’acoustique à la sémantique. Paris: Klincksieck.
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Report No. CSLI-85–37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
Hobbs, J. R. and Agar, M. (1985). The coherence of incoherent discourse, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4(3–4), 213–232.
Höhle, T. (1992). Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 4, 112–141.
Holmes, J. (1982). Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal, 13(2), 9–28.
Houtkoop-Steenstra (1987). Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-acceptance Sequences. Dordrecht/Providence, RI: Foris Publication.
Hoymann, G. (2010). Questions and responses in ǂAkhoe Haiǀǀom. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10): 2726–2740.
Isaacs, S. S. (1930). Intellectual Growth in Young Children. London: Routledge.
Jaswal, V. K. and Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don’t always know best: Preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17(9), 757–758.
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York, NY: Free Press.
Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.
Jefferson, G. (1981). The abominable “Ne?”: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon of Post-response Pursuit of Response. Occasional Paper No. 6, Department of Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens “Yeah” and “Mm hm”. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 30, 1–18.
Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441.
Jefferson, G. (1993). Caveat speaker. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 2, 1–30.
Jefferson, G. (2002). Is “no” an acknowledgment token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1345–1383.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. M. (1999). The Welsh Answering System, vol. CXX. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, E. E., Fox, B. and Curl, T. (1998). Lexical, prosodic, and syntactic cues for dialog acts. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING-98 Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, ACL (pp. 114–120).
Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language; Mathematical Centre Tracts 135 (pp. 277–322). Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on ‘I Think’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Keisanen, T. (2006). Patterns of Stance Taking. Negative Yes/no Interrogatives and Tag Questions in American English Conversation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oulu.
Kelly, J. and Local, J. (1989). Doing Phonology. Manchester University Press.
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, 22–63.
Koenig, M. A. and Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76(6), 1261–1277.
Kori, S. and Farnetani, E. (1983). Acoustic manifestation of focus in Italian. Quaderni del Centro di Studio per le Ricerche di Fonetica, 2, 323–328.
Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851–1877.
Koshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges, Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51–77.
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond Rhetorical Questions. Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
Ladd, D. R. (1980). The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonation Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, K. and Michaelis, L. A. (1998). Sentence accent in information questions: default and projection. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 477–544.
Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20, 441–458.
Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32, 177–201.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.
Levelt, W. J. M. and Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in Q answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2005). Living with Manny’s dangerous idea. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 431–453.
Levinson, S. C. (2007). Repair and the optimizing of person reference – perspectives from usage on Rossel Island. In N. J. Enfield and T. Stivers (eds.), Person Reference in Interaction (pp. 29–72). Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2010). Questions and responses in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In N. J. Enfield, T. Stivers and S. Levinson (eds.), Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics, 42: 2741–2755. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Levinson, S. C. (in preparation). A Grammar of YélîDnye.
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 6, 339–359.
Lewis, D. (1979/1991). Scorekeeping in a language game. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader (pp. 416–427). New York: Oxford University Press.
Liep, J. (2009). A Papuan Plutocracy. Ranked Exchange on Rossel Island. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Lindström, A. (forthcoming). Acceptance and drantings of deferred action requests, invitations and proposals. In Geoffrey Raymond, Gene Lerner and John Heritage (eds.), Enabling Human Conduct: Naturalistic Studies of Talk-in-Interaction in Honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindström, A. and Mondada, L. (eds.) (2009). Special issue on assessments in social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42.
Mackenzie, L. (2009). Content interrogatives in a sample of 50 languages. Lingua, 19, 1131–1163.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploitation and exploration in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2(1), 71–87.
Maynard, D. W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(2), 93–130.
Merritt, M. W. (1976). On questions following questions (in service encounters). Language in Society, 5, 315–357.
Meyer, W. J. and Shane, J. (1973). The form and function of children’s questions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 285–296.
Monzoni, C. (2008). Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of “pre-sequences”?Discourse Studies, 10(1), 73–87.
Morency, L.-P., de Kok, I. and Gratch, J. (2010). A probabilistic multimodal approach for predicting listener backchannels. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 20, 70–84.
Newcombe, P. A. and Dour, T. M. (2001). Conversational influences on young children’s responses to misleading questions. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 363–378.
Nurmsoo, E. and Robinson, E. J. (2009). Children’s trust in previously inaccurate informants who were well or poorly informed: When past errors can be excused. Child Development, 80(1), 23–27.
Ohala, J. (1983). Cross-linguistic study of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica, 40, 1–18.
Ohala, J. (1984). An ethological perspective of common cross-language utilisation of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16.
Oostdijk, N. H. J. (2000). The spoken Dutch corpus. Outline and first evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. II, 887–894. Athens, Greece.
Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M. and Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental Psychology, 43(5), 1216–1226.
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler. Dover: New York.
Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Pierrehumbert, J. and Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 271–312). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books (MIT Press).
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Attributions of responsibility: Blamings. Sociology, 12, 115–121.
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198.
Pomerantz, A. (1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1984b). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 152–164). Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information-seeking strategy. Communication Monographs, 55, 360–373.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Raymond, G. (2000). The Structure of Responding: Type-conforming and Nonconforming Responses to Yes/no Type Interrogatives. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967.
Raymond, G. (2010). Grammar and social relations: Alternative forms of yes/no type initiating actions in health visitor interaction. In A. F. Freed and S. Ehrlich (eds.), ‘Why Do You Ask?’: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse (pp. 87–107). New York: Oxford University Press.
Raymond, G. and Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.
Rendle-Short, J. (2007). “Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1503–1525.
Rialland, A. (2004). Question prosody: An African perspective. ESF Conference on Tone and Intonation, Santorini, Greece, 9–11 September 2004.
Rossano, F. (2005). When it’s over is it really over? On the effects of sustained gaze vs. gaze withdrawal at sequence possible completion. International Pragmatics Association, Riva del Garda, Italy.
Rossano, F. (2006). When the eyes meet: Using gaze to mobilise response. International Conference on Conversation Analysis. Helsinki, Finland.
Rossano, F. (2010a). Questioning and responding in Italian. Special Issue of Journal of Pragmatics, 40: 2756–2771.
Rossano, F. (2010b). Questioning and responding in Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 2756–2771.
Rossano, F., Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In J. Sidnell (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, vol. II. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Publishers.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Sadock, J. M. (2003). A Grammar of Kalaallisut (West Greenlandic Inuttut). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Sadock, J. M. and Zwicky, A. M. (1985). Sentence types. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (pp. 155–196). Cambridge University Press.
Sadock, J. M. and Zwicky, A. M. (2007). Speech act distinctions in syntax. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I, 2nd edn:. Clause structure (pp. 276–324). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(4), 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1981 (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 28–52). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987a). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 70–85). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987b). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25, 201–218.
Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational Organization and Its Development. Advances in Discourse Processes, vol. XXXVIII (pp. 51–77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185–211.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, S. Thompson and E. Schegloff (eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499–547.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. and Lerner, G. H. (2009). Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to Wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 91–115.
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975a). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Language (pp. 334–369). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975b). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. III (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic Press.
Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 550–569). Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called “astonished” questions in repair. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies (pp. 231–270). Cambridge University Press.
Shatz, M. (1978). On the development of communicative understanding: An early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 271–301.
Shatz, M. (1979). How to do things by asking: Form-function pairings in mothers’ questions and their relation to children’s responses. Child Development, 50(4), 1093–1099.
Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children’s learning. Child Development, 71(1), 26–35.
Sinclair, A. (1996). Young children’s practical deceptions and their understanding of false belief. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(2), 157–173.
Sinclair, A. and Van Gessel, R. (1990). The form and function of questions in children’s conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(6), 923–944.
Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001a). Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sorjonen, M.-L. (2001b). Simple answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish. In M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (pp. 405–431). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic Vigilance. Mind and Language, 25(4), 359–393.
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.
Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689.
Steensig, J. and Drew, P. (2008a). Introduction: Questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction. Discourse Studies, 10(1), 5–15.
Steensig, J. and Drew, P. (2008b). Questioning. Special issue of Discourse Studies, 10(1).
Steffensen, M. S. (1978). Satisfying inquisitive adults: Some simple methods of answering yes/no questions. Journal of Child Language, 5(2), 221–236.
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 131–158.
Stivers, T. (2007). Prescribing under pressure: Parent-physician conversations and antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stivers, T. (2010) An overview of the question-response system in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2772–2781.
Stivers, T. (2011) Morality and question design: “Of course” as contesting a presupposition of askability. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada and J. Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T. and Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1–25.
Stivers, T. and Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392.
Stivers, T. and Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 43(1), 1–31.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J. and Levinson, S. C. (2010). Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages. Journal of Pragmatics [Special issue], 42(10), 2615–2619.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E. and Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (26), 10587–10592. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903616106.
Svartvik, J. and Quirk, R. (eds.) (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: Gleerup.
Tizard, B. and Hughes, M. (1984). Young Children Learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Turner, P. (2009). Grammar and epistemics in question construction: After hours calls to an on-call physician. Unpublished paper, Department of Applied Linguistics, UCLA.
Ultan, R. (1978). Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. II (pp. 211–248). Stanford University Press.
Van Dale Dutch–English electronic dictionary, version 5.0, 2009, version 1.04.
VanderBorght, M. and Jaswal, V. K. (2009). Who knows best? Preschoolers sometimes prefer child informants over adult informants. Infant and Child Development, 18, 61–71.
van Eijck, J. and Visser, A. (2010). Dynamic semantics. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/dynamic-semantics/.
Vinkhuysen, E. and Szymanski, M. H. (2005). Would You Like to Do it Yourself? Service Requests and Their Non-granting Responses. In K. Richards and P. Seedhouse (eds.), Applying Conversation Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Collaborative Processes of Language Use in Conversation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Yoon, K.-E. (2010). Questions and responses in Korean conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (special issue), 2782–2898.
Zeshan, U. (2003). Indo-Pakistani sign language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies, 3(2), 157–212.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.