Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Nanostructure design and structural properties of epitaxially grown quantum dots and nanowires
- Part II Manipulation of individual quantum states in quantum dots using optical techniques
- Part III Optical properties of quantum dots in photonic cavities and plasmon-coupled dots
- Part IV Quantum dot nano-laboratory: magnetic ions and nuclear spins in a dot
- Part V Electron transport in quantum dots fabricated by lithographic techniques from III–V semiconductors and graphene
- Part VI Single dots for future telecommunications applications
- 18 Electrically operated entangled light sources based on quantum dots
- 19 Deterministic single quantum dot cavities at telecommunication wavelengths
- Index
- References
19 - Deterministic single quantum dot cavities at telecommunication wavelengths
from Part VI - Single dots for future telecommunications applications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Part I Nanostructure design and structural properties of epitaxially grown quantum dots and nanowires
- Part II Manipulation of individual quantum states in quantum dots using optical techniques
- Part III Optical properties of quantum dots in photonic cavities and plasmon-coupled dots
- Part IV Quantum dot nano-laboratory: magnetic ions and nuclear spins in a dot
- Part V Electron transport in quantum dots fabricated by lithographic techniques from III–V semiconductors and graphene
- Part VI Single dots for future telecommunications applications
- 18 Electrically operated entangled light sources based on quantum dots
- 19 Deterministic single quantum dot cavities at telecommunication wavelengths
- Index
- References
Summary
Scalability requirements in future device application of self-assembled quantum dots for non-classical light generation necessitate control of the quantum dot nucleation site. In this chapter we discuss a site-control technique based on directed self-assembly of InAs/InP quantum dots emitting at telecommunication wavelengths. The site-control method preserves the high optical quality inherent in self-assembled quantum dots and the characteristic signatures of a strongly confined system are observed in the emission spectra. The efficacy of site-control manifests in the coupling of single quantum dots to microcavities required for the fabrication of efficient devices. The a priori knowledge of the quantum dot position is used to deterministically couple single dots to high-finesse microcavities with the assurance that one and only one quantum dot is coupled to each cavity. Such devices form the basis of efficient sources of single photons and entangled photon pairs for telecommunications applications that can be manufactured in a scalable manner using conventional semiconductor processing.
Introduction
Self-assembled quantum dots possess the two-level emitter characteristics required for non-classical light generation [37] in quantum information processing and quantum key distribution. The performance of a quantum dot-based single photon source or entangled photon pair source will depend on how well the dot can be coupled to a high-quality factor Q, small volume Veff microcavity [44]. The cavity is required to channel photons from the exciton decay into an optical mode that can be collected by an external optical system.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum DotsOptics, Electron Transport and Future Applications, pp. 341 - 355Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
[1] , and 1999. Strong-coupling regime for quantum boxes in pillar microcavities: Theory. Phys. Rev.B, 60, 13 276.Google Scholar
[2] , , , and 2008. Site-controlled growth and luminescence of InAs quantum dots using in situ Ga-assisted deoxidation of patterned substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 101908.Google Scholar
[3] , , et al. 2005. Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes. Science, 308, 1158.Google Scholar
[4] , , et al. 2004. Single photon emission from site-controlled pyramidal quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 648.Google Scholar
[5] , , et al. 2002. Fine structure of neutral and charged excitons in self-assembled In(Ga)As/(Al)GaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev.B, 65, 195315.Google Scholar
[6] , , , and 2004. Optical spectroscopy of single, site-selected, InAs/InP self-assembled quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84, 978.Google Scholar
[7] , , , and 2005. Post-fabrication fine-tuning of photonic crystal microcavities in InAs/InP quantum dot membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 151107.Google Scholar
[8] , , et al. 2010. Deterministic emitter-cavity coupling using a s ingle-site controlled quantum dot. Phys. Rev.B, 82, 033381.Google Scholar
[9] , , , and 2007. Tuning of the electronic properties of self-assembled InAs/InP (001) quantum dots using grown-in defect mediated intermixing. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 13105.Google Scholar
[10] , , et al. 2008. Controlled light–matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using far-field optical lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 267404.Google Scholar
[11] , , et al. 2007. Control of fine-structure splitting of i ndividual InAs quantum dots by rapid thermal annealing. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 011907.Google Scholar
[12] , , , and 2010. Fast electrical control of q quantum dot strongly coupled to a photonic-crystal cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 047402.Google Scholar
[13] , , et al. 2006. Experimental demonstration of high quality factor, x-dipole modes in InAs/InP quantum dot photonic crystal microcvity membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89, 191115.Google Scholar
[14] , , et al. 2008. Integration of site-controlled pyramidal quantum dots and photonic crystal membrane cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 263101.Google Scholar
[15] , , et al. 2005. Tuning photonic crystal nanocavity modes by wet chemical digital etching. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 021108.Google Scholar
[16] , , et al. 2007. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system. Nature, 445, 896–899.
[17] 2010. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with semiconductor quantum dots: role of phonon-assisted cavity feeding. Phys. Rev.B, 81, 155303.Google Scholar
[18] and 2007. Single photon emission from an InGaAs quantum dot precisely position on a nanoplane. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 073105.Google Scholar
[19] and 2009. Theory of quantum light emission from a strongly-coupled single quantum dot photonic-crystal cavity system. Opt. Exp., 17, 3322.Google Scholar
[20] , , et al. 2011. Influence of electron-acoustic phonon scattering on off-resonant cavity feeding within a strongly coupled quantum-dot cavity system. Phys. Rev.B, 83, 165313.Google Scholar
[21] , , et al. 2006. Registration of single quantum dots using cryogenic laser photolithography. Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, 193106.Google Scholar
[22] 2003. Nonclassical light from single semiconductor quantum dots. Topics Appl. Phys., 90, 315.Google Scholar
[23] , and 2008. Role of electron–phonon scattering on the vacuum Rabi splitting of a single-quantum dot and a photonic-crystal-nanocavity. Phys. Rev.B, 78, 035330.Google Scholar
[24] , , et al. 2005. Scanning a photonic crystal slab nanocavity by condensation of xenon. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 141105.Google Scholar
[25] , , et al. 1999. Room temperature photonic crystal defect lasers at near-infrared wavelengths in InGaAsP. J. Lightwave Technol., 17, 2082.Google Scholar
[26] and 2009. Cavity-assisted fast generation of entangled photon pairs through the biexciton-exciton cascade. Phys. Rev.B, 80, 155525.Google Scholar
[27] , , et al. 2005. Exciton–photon strong-coupling regime for a single quantum dot embedded in a microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 067401.Google Scholar
[28] 2003. Epitaxial growth and electronic structure of self-assembled quantum dots. Topics Appl. Phys., 90, 1–24.Google Scholar
[29] , , , and 2001. Chemical beam epitaxy of self-assembled InAs/InP quanum dots. J. Vac. Sci. Technol.B, 19, 1467.Google Scholar
[30] , , and 2010. Selective epitaxy of semiconductor nanopyramids for nanophotonics. Nanotech., 21, 295302.Google Scholar
[31] , et al. 2007. Photon antibunching from a single quantum-dot-microcavity system in the strong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 117402.Google Scholar
[32] 1946. Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio reguencies. Phys. Rev., 69, 681.Google Scholar
[33] , , et al. 2007. In situ laser microprocessing of single s elf-assembled quantum dots and optical microcavities. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 073120.Google Scholar
[34] , , et al. 2008. Prepositioned single quantum dot in a lateral electric field. Phys. Rev.B, 78, 195301.Google Scholar
[35] , , et al. 2004. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot-semiconductor microcavity system. Nature, 432, 197.
[36] , , et al. 2009. Single photon emission from a site-controlled quantum dot-micropillar cavity system. Appl. Phys. Lett., 94, 111111.Google Scholar
[38] , , et al. 2005. Site-controlled photoluminescence at telecommunication wavelength from InAs/InP quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 86, 113.Google Scholar
[39] and 2007. Optical fiber taper coupling and high-resolution wavelength tuning of microdisk resonators at cyrogenic temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 031114.Google Scholar
[40] and 2009. Laser rapid thermal annealing of quantum semiconductor wafers: a one step bandgap engineering technique. Appl. Phys.A, 94, 667.Google Scholar
[41] and 1939. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz Math.-Naturwiss K1. IIb, 146, 797.
[42] , , et al. 2008. Scalable fabrication of optical resonators with embedded site-controlled quantum dots. Opt. Lett., 33, 1759.Google Scholar
[43] and 2010. Linear spectrum of a quantum dot coupled to a nanocavity. Phys. Rev.B, 81, 075305.Google Scholar
[44] 2003. Optical microcavities. Nature, 424, 839.
[45] , , et al. 2004. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature, 432, 200.Google Scholar