Abel, N. H. [1825] ‘Letter to Holmboë’, in Lie, S. and Sylow, L. (eds.): Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 2. Christiana: Grøndahl, 1881, pp. 257–8.Google Scholar

Abel, N. H. [1826a] ‘Letter to Hansteen’, in Lie, S. and Sylow, L. (eds.): Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 2. Christiania: Grøndahl, 1881, pp. 263–5.Google Scholar

Abel, N. H. [1826b] ‘Untersuchungen über die Reihe 1+m1x+m.(m−1)2x2+m.(m−1)(m−2)2.3x3…’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 1, pp. 311–39.Google Scholar

Abel, N. H. [1881] ‘Sur les Séries’, in Lie, S. and Sylow, L. (eds.): Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 2. Christiania: Grøndahl, pp. 197–205.Google Scholar

Aetius [c. 150] Placita, in Diels, H. (ed.): Doxographi Graeci. Berolini: Reimeri, 1879.

Aleksandrov, A. D. [1956] ‘A General View of Mathematics’, in Aleksandrov, A. D., Kolmogorov, A. N. and Lavrent'ev, M. A. (eds.): Mathematics: its Content, Methods and Meaning. (English translation by S. H. Gould, K. A. Hirsch and T. Bartha. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Ambrose, A. [1959] ‘Proof and the Theorem Proved’, Mind, 68, pp. 435–45.Google Scholar

Arber, A. [1954] The Mind and the Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. [1724] La Logique, ou L'Art de Penser. Lille: Publications de la Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines de L'Université de Lille, 1964.Google Scholar

Bacon, F. [1620] Novum Organum. English translation in Ellis, R. L. and Spedding, J. (eds.): The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon. London: Routledge, 1905, pp. 241–387.Google Scholar

Baltzer, R. [1862] Die Elemente der Mathematik, vol. 2. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar

Bartley, W. W. [1962] Retreat to Commitment. New York: Alfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar

Becker, J. C. [1869a] ‘Über Polyeder’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 14, pp. 65–76.Google Scholar

Becker, J. C. [1869b] ‘Nachtrag zu dem Aufsätze über Polyeder’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 14, pp. 337–343.Google Scholar

Becker, J. C. [1874] ‘Neuer Beweis und Erweiterung eines Fundamentalsatzes über Polyederflächen’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 19, pp. 459-60.Google Scholar

Bell, E. T. [1945] The Development of Mathematics. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bérard, J. B. [1818–19] ‘Sur le Nombre des Racines Imaginaires des Équations; en Réponse aux Articles de MM. Tédenat et Servois’, Annales de Mathématiques, Pures et Appliquées, 9, pp. 345–72.Google Scholar

Bernays, P. [1947] Review of Pólya [1945], Dialectica 1, pp. 178–88.Google Scholar

Bolzano, B. [1837] Wissenschaftslehre. Leipzig: Meiner, 1914–31.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. [1949] Topologie Général. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Bourbaki, N. [1960] Éléments d'Histoire des Mathématiques. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Boyer, C. [1939] The Concepts of the Calculus. New York: Dover, 1949.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. B. [1953] Scientific Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brouwer, L. E. J. [1952] ‘Historical background, Principles and Methods of Intuitionism’, South African Journal of Science, 49, pp. 139–46.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. [1937] The Logical Syntax of Language. New York and London: Kegan Paul. (Revised translation of Logische Syntax der Sprache, Vienna: Springer, 1934.)Google Scholar

Carslaw, H. S. [1930] Introduction to the Theory of Fourier's Series and Integrals. Third edition. New York: Dover, 1950.Google Scholar

Cauchy, A. L. [1813a] ‘Recherches sur les Polyèdres’, Journal de L'École Polytechnique, 9, pp. 68–86. (Read in February 1811.)Google Scholar

Cauchy, A. L. [1813b] ‘Sur les Polygones et les Polyèdres’, Journal de L'École Polytechnique, 9, pp. 87–98. (Read in January 1812.)Google Scholar

Cauchy, A. L. [1821] Cours d'Analyse de L'École Royale Polytechnique. Paris: de Bure.Google Scholar

Cauchy, A. L. [1826] ‘Mémoire sur les Développements des Functions en Séries Périodiques’, Mémoires de L'Académie des Sciences 6, pp. 603–12.Google Scholar

Cauchy, A. L. [1853] ‘Note sur les Séries Convergentes dont les Divers Terms sont des Fonctions Continues d'une Variable Réelle ou Imaginaire entre des Limites Données’, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de L'Académie des Sciences, 37, pp. 454–9.Google Scholar

Cayley, A. [1859] ‘On Poinsot's Four New Regular Solids’, The Landon, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 4th Series, 17, pp. 123–8.Google Scholar

Cayley, A. [1861] ‘On the Partitions of a Close’, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 4th Series, 21, pp. 424–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, A. [1956] Introduction to Mathematical Logic, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Clairaut, A. C. [1741] Elements de Géométrie. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar

Copi, I. M. [1949] ‘Modern Logic and the Synthetic A Priori’, The Journal of Philosophy, 46, pp. 243–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copi, I. M. [1950] ‘Gödel and the Synthetic A Priori: a Rejoinder’, The Journal of Philosophy, 47, pp. 633–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crelle, A. L. [1826–7] Lehrbuch der Elemente der Geometrie, vols. 1 and 2, Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Curry, H. B. [1951] Outlines of a Formalist Philosophy of Mathematics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Darboux, G. [1874a] ‘Lettre à Houel, 12 Janvier’. (Quoted in Rostand, F.: Souci d'exactitude et Scrupules des Mathématiciens. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1960, p. 11.)Google Scholar

Darboux, G. [1874b] ‘Lettre à Houel, 19 Fèvrier’. (Quoted in Rostand, F.: Souci d'exactitude et Scrupules des Mathématiciens. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1960, p. 194.)Google Scholar

Darboux, G. [1875] ‘Mémoire sur les Fonctions Discontinues’, Annales Scientifiques de L'École Normale Supérieure, second series 4, pp. 57–112.

Darboux, G. [1883] ‘Lettre à Houel, 2 Septembre’. (Quoted in Rostand, F.: Souci d'exactitude et Scrupules des Mathématiciens. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1960, p. 261.)Google Scholar

Denjoy, A. [1919] ‘L'Orientation Actuelle des Mathématiques’, Revue du Mois, 20, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. [1628] Rules for the Direction of the Mind. English translation in Haldane, E. S. and Ross, G. R. T. (eds.): Descartes’ Philosophical Works, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. [1639] De Solidorum Elementis. (First published in Foucher de Careil: Oeuvres Inédites de Descartes, vol. 2, Paris: August Durand, 1860, pp. 214–34. For a considerably improved text see C. Adam and P. Tannery (eds.): Oeuvres de Descartes, vol. 10, pp. 257–78, Paris: Cerf, 1908.)Google Scholar

Dieudonné, J. [1939] ‘Les Méthodes Axiomatiques Modernes et les Fondements des Mathématiques’, Revue Scientifique, 77, pp. 224–32.Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertius [c. 200] Vitae Philosophorus. With an English translation by Hicks, R. D.. Vol. 2, London: Heinemann, 1925.Google Scholar

Dirichlet, P. L. [1829] ‘Sur la Convergence des Séries Trigonométriques que servent à représenter une Fonction Arbitraire entre des Limites Données’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 4, pp. 157–69.Google Scholar

Dirichlet, P. L. [1837] ‘Über die Darstellung Ganz Willkürlicher Functionen durch Sinus- und Cosinusreihen’, in Dove, H. W. and Moser, L. (eds.): Repertorium der Physik, 1, pp. 152–74.Google Scholar

Dirichlet, P. L. [1853] ‘Letter to Gauss, 20 February, 1853’, in Kronecker, L. (ed.): Werke, vol. 2. Berlin: Reiner, 1897, pp. 385–7.Google Scholar

du Bois-Reymond, P. D. G. [1875] ‘Beweis, das die Coefficienten der Trigono-metrischen Reihe f(x)=∑p=0p=∞(apcospx+bpsinpx) die werte a0=12π displaystyle=“true” ∫−π+πdαf(α),ap=1π displaystyle=“true” ∫−π+πdαf(α)cospα,bp=1π displaystyle=“true” ∫−π+πdαf(α)sinpα haben, jedesmal wenn diese Integrale Endlich und Bestimmt sind’, Abhandlungen der Königlich-Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe, 12, 1, pp. 117–66.Google Scholar

du Bois-Reymond, P. D. G. [1876] ‘Untersuchungen über die Convergenz und Divergenz der Fourier'schen Darstellungsformeln’, Abhandlungen der Königlich–Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe, 12, 2, pp. i–xxiv and 1–102.Google Scholar

du Bois-Reymond, P. D. G. [1879] ‘Erläuterungen zu den Anfangsgründen der Variationrechnung’, Mathematische Annalen, 15, pp. 282–315, 564–76.Google Scholar

du Bois-Reymond, P. D. G. [1885] Über den Begriff der Länge einer Curve’, Acta Mathematica, 6, pp. 167–8.Google Scholar

Dyck, W. [1888] ‘Beiträge zur Analysis Situs’, Mathematische Annalen, 32, pp. 457–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einstein, A. [1953] ‘Letter to P. A. Schilpp’. Published in P. A. Schilpp: ‘The Abdication of Philosophy’, Kant Studien, 51, pp. 490–1, 1959–60.Google Scholar

Euler, L. [1756–7] ‘Specimen de usu Observationum in Mathesi Pura’, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae, 6, pp. 185–230. Editorial summary, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar

Euler, L. [1758a] ‘Elementa Doctrinae Solidorum’, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae, 4. pp. 109–40. (Read in November 1750.)Google Scholar

Euler, L. [1758b] ‘Demonstratio Nonnullarum lnsignium Proprietatus Quibus Solida Hedris Planis Inclusa sunt Praedita’, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae, 4, pp. 140–60. (Read in September 1751.)Google Scholar

Eves, H. and Newsom, C. V. [1958] An Introduction to the Foundations and Fundamental Concepts of Mathematics. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

Félix, L. [1957] L'Aspect Moderne des Mathématiques. (English translation by J. H. Hlavaty and F. H. Hlavaty: The Modern Aspect of Mathematics, New York: Basic Books, 1960.)Google Scholar

Forder, H. G. [1927] The Foundations of Euclidean Geometry. New York: Dover, 1958.Google Scholar

Fourier, J. [1808] ‘Mémoire sur la Propagation de la Chaleur dans les Corpe Solides (Extrait)’, Nouveau Bulletin des Sciences, par la Société Philomathique de Paris, I, pp. 112–16.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. [1928] Les Éspaces Abstraits. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. [1938] ‘L'Analyse Générale et la Question des Fondements’, in Gonseth, F. (ed.): Les Entretiens de Zurich, sur les Fondements et la Méthode des Sciences Mathématiques, Zürich: Leemans Frères et Cie, 1941, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar

Frege, G. [1893] Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, vol. 1, Hildesheim: George Olms, 1962.Google Scholar

Gamow, G. [1953] One, Two, Three … Infinity. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar

Gauss, C. F. [1813] ‘Disquisitiones Generales Circa Seriem Infinitam 1+αβ1.γ.x+α(α+1)β(β+1)1.2.γ(γ+1)x.x+α(α+1)(α+2)β(β+1)(β+2)1.2.3.γ(γ+1)(γ+2).x3+etc.’, in Werke, vol. 3, pp. 123–62. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Gergonne, J. D. [1818] ‘Essai sur la Théorie des Definitions’, Annales de Mathématiques, Pures et Appliquées, 9, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. [1933] ‘Some Aspects of Evolution’, Science, 78, pp. 539–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grunert, J. A. [1827] ‘Einfacher Beweis der von Cauchy und Euler Gefundenen Sätze von Figurennetzen und Polyedern’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 2, p. 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halmos, P. [1950] Measure Theory. New York and London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankel, H. [1882] ‘Untersuchungen über die Unendlich oft Oscillierenden und Unstetigen Functionen’, Mathematische Annalen, 20, pp. 63–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, G. H. [1918] ‘Sir George Stokes and the Concept of Uniform Convergence’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 19, pp. 148–56.Google Scholar

Hardy, G. H. [1928] ‘Mathematical Proof’, Mind, 38, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Haussner, R. (ed.) [1906] Abhandlungen über die Regelmassigen Sternkörper. Ostwald's Klassiker der Exacten Wissenschaften, No. 151, Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Heath, T. L. [1925] The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. [1945] ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmation, 1 and 2’, Mind, 54, pp. 1–26 and 97–121.Google Scholar

Hermite, C. [1893] ‘Lettre à Stieltjes, 20 Mai 1893’, in Baillaud, B. and Bourget, H. (eds.): Correspondence d'Hermite et de Stieltjes, vol. 2. Paris: Gautheirs-Villars, 1905, pp. 317–19.Google Scholar

Hessel, J. F. [1832] ‘Nachtrag zu dem Euler'schen Lehrsatze von Polyedern’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 8, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar

Heyting, A. [1939] ‘Les Fondements des Mathématiques du Point de Vue lntuitionniste’, in Gonseth, F.: Philosophie Mathématique, Paris: Hermann, pp. 73–5.Google Scholar

Heyting, A. [1956] Intuitionism: An Introduction. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. and Cohn-Vossen, S. [1932] Anschauliche Geometrie. Berlin: Springer. English translation by P. Nemenyi: Geometry and the Imagination. New York: Chelsea, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbes, T. [1651] Leviathan, in Molesworth, W. (ed.): The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 3, London: John Bohn, 1839.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. [1656] The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity and Chance, in Molesworth, W. (ed.): The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 5, London: John Bohn, 1841.Google Scholar

Hölder, O. [1924] Die Mathematische Methode. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoppe, R. [1879] ‘Ergänzung des Eulerschen Satzes von den Polyedern’, Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, 63, pp. 100–3.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. [1900] Logische Untersuchungen, vol. 1. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1968.Google Scholar

Jonquières, E. de [1890a] ‘Note sur un Point Fondamental de la Théorie des Polyèdres’, Comptes Rendus des Séances de L'Académie des Sciences, 110, pp. 110-15,Google Scholar

Jonquières, E. de [1890b] ‘Note sur le Théorème d'Euler dans la Théorie des Polyèdres’, Comptes Rendus des Séances de L'Académie des Sciences, 110, pp. 169–73.Google Scholar

Jordan, C. [1866a] ‘Recherches sur les Polyèdres’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 66, pp. 22–85.Google Scholar

Jordan, C. [1866b] ‘Résumé de Recherches sur la Symétrie des Polyèdres non Euleriens’, Jounal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 66, pp. 86–91.Google Scholar

Jordan, C. [1881] ‘Sur Ia Série de Fourier’, Comptes Rendus des Séances de L'Académie des Sciences, 92, pp. 228–33.Google Scholar

Jordan, C. [1887] Cours d'Analyse de L'École Polytechnique, vol 3, first edition. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar

Jordan, C. [1893] Cours d'Analyse de L'École Polytechnique, vol. 1, second edition. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar

Jourdain, P. E. B. [1912] ‘Note on Fourier's Influence on the Conceptions of Mathematics’, Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Mathematics, 2, pp. 526–7.Google Scholar

Kant, I. [1781] Critik der Reinen Verunft. First edition.

Kepler, I. [1619] Harmonice Mundi, in Caspar, M. and Dyck, W. von (eds.): Gesammelte Werke, vol. 6. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1940.Google Scholar

Knopp, K. [1928] Theory and Application of Infinite Series. (Translated by Young, R. C., London and Glasgow: Blackie, 1928.)Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. [1961] Essays in the Logic of Mathematical Discovery, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. [1962] ‘Infinite Regress and the Foundations of Mathematics’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volumes, 36, pp. 155–84.Google Scholar

Lakatos, I. [1970] ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. E. (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, E. [1930] Grundlagen der Analysis. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Lebesgue, H. [1923] ‘Notice sur la Vie et les Travaux de Camille Jordan’, Mémoires de L'Académie de L'Institute de France, 58, pp. 34–66. Reprinted in H. Lebesgue, Notices d'Histoire des Mathématiques, Genève. pp. 40–65.Google Scholar

Lebesgue, H. [1928] Leçons sur L'Intégration et la Recherche des Fonctions Primitives. Paris: Gauthier-Villars. (Second, enlarged edition of the original 1905 version.)Google Scholar

Legendre, A.-M. [1809] Éléments de Géométrie. Eighth edition. Paris: Didot. The first edition appeared in 1794.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. F. [1687] ‘Letter to Bayle’, in Gerhardt, C. I. (ed.): Philosophische Schriften, vol. 3, Hildesheim: George Olms (1965), p. 52.Google Scholar

Lhuilier, S. A. J. [1786] Exposition Élémentaire des Principes des Calculs Supérieurs. Berlin: G. J. Decker.Google Scholar

Lhuilier, S. A. J. [1812–13a] ‘Mémoire sur la Polyèdrométrie’, Annales de Mathématiques, Pures et Appliquées, 3, pp. 168–91.Google Scholar

Lhulier, S. A. J. [1812–13b] ‘Mémoire sur les Solides Réguliers’, Annales de Mathématiques, Pures et Appliquées, 3, pp. 233–7.Google Scholar

Listing, J. B. [1861] ‘Der Census Räumlicher Complexe’, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 10, pp. 97–182.Google Scholar

Loève, M. [1955] Probability Theory. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, L. [1863] ‘Über die Scheinbaren Einschränkungen des Euler'schen Satzes von den Polyedern’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 8, pp. 449–50.Google Scholar

Meister, A. L. F. [1771] ‘Generalia de Genesi Figurarum Planarum et inde Pendentibus Earum Affectionibus’, Novi Commentarii Societatis Reglae Scientiarum Gottingensis, 1, pp. 144–80.Google Scholar

Menger, K. [1928] Dimensionstheorie. Berlin: Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Möbius, A. F. [1827] Der Barycentrische Calcul. Hildesheim: George Olms, 1968.Google Scholar

Möbius, A. F. [1865] ‘Über die Bestimmung des Inhaltes eines Polyeders’, Berichte Königlich-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch–Physikalische Classe, 17, pp. 31–68.Google Scholar

Moigno, F. N. M. [1840–1] Leçons de Calcul Differentiel et de Calcul Intégral, 2 vols. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar

Moore, E. H. [1902] ‘On the Foundations of Mathematics’, Science, 17, pp. 401–16.Google Scholar

Morgan, A. de [1842] The Differential and Integral Calculus. London: Baldwin and Gadock.Google Scholar

Munroe, M. E. [1953] Introduction to Measure and Integration. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Neumann, J. von [1947] ‘The Mathematician’, in Heywood, R. B. (ed.): The Works of the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Newton, I. [1717] Opticks. Second edition. London: Dover, 1952.Google Scholar

Olivier, L. [1826] ‘Bemerkungen über Figuren, die aus Behebigen, von Geraden Linien Umschlossenen Figuren Zusammengesetzt sind’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandt Mathematik, 1, pp. 227–31.Google Scholar

Pascal, B. [1659] Les Réflexions sur la Géométrie en Général (De L'Ésprit Géométrique et de L'Art de Persuader). In Chevalier, J. (ed.): Oeuvres Complètes, Paris: La Librairie Gallimard, 1954, pp. 575–604.Google Scholar

Peano, G. [1894] Notations de Logique Mathématique. Turin: Guadagnini.Google Scholar

Pierpont, J. [1905] The Theory of Functions of Real Variables, vol. 1. New York: Dover, 1959.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. [1893] ‘Sur la Généralisation d'un Théorème d'Euler relatif aux Polyèdres’, Comptes Rendus Je Séances de L'Académie des Sciences, 117, p. 144.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. [1899] ‘Complément à L'Analysis Situs’, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, 13, pp. 285–343.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. [1902] La Science et L'Hypothèse. Paris: Flammarion. Authorised English translation by G. B. Halsted: The Foundations of Science, Lancaster, Pennsylvania: The Science Press, 1913, pp. 27–197.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. [1905] La Valeur de la Science. Paris: Flammarion. Authorised English translation by G. B. Halsted: The Foundations of Science, Lancaster, Pennsylvania: The Science Press, 1913, pp. 359–546.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. [1908] Science et Méthode. Paris: Flammarion. Authorised English translation by G. B. Halsted: The Foundations of Science, Lancaster, Pennsylvania: The Science Press, pp. 546–854.Google Scholar

Poinsot, L. [1810] ‘Mémoire sur les Polygones et les Polyèdres’, Journal de L'École Polytéchnique, 4, pp. 16–48. (Read in July 1809.)Google Scholar

Poinsot, L. [1858] ‘Note sur la Théorie des Polyèdres’, Comptes Rendus de L'Académie des Sciences, 46, pp. 65–79.Google Scholar

Pólya, G. [1945] How to Solve It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pólya, G. [1954] Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, vols. 1 and 2. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pólya, G. [1962a] Mathematical Discovery, vol. 1. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Pólya, G. [1962b] ‘The Teaching of Mathematics and the Biogenetic Law’, in Good, I. J. (ed.): The Scientist Speculates. London: Heinemann, pp. 352–6.Google Scholar

Pólya, G. and Szegö, G. [1927] Aufgaben und Lehrsätze aus der Analysis, vol. 1. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1934] Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1935] ‘Letter to the Editor’, Erkenntnis, 3, pp. 426–9. Republished in Appendix *i to Popper [1959], pp. 311–14.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1945] The Open Society and its Enemies. 2 volumes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1947] ‘Logic Without Assumptions’, Aristotelian Society Proceedings, 47, pp. 251–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1952] ‘The Nature of Philosophical Problems and their Roots in Science’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, pp. 124–56. Reprinted in Popper [1963a].Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1957] The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1959] The Logic of Scientific Discovery. English translation of [1934].London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1963a] Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. [1963b] ‘Science: Problems, Aims, Responsibilities’, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology: Federation Proceedings, 22, pp. 961–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Popper, K. R. [1972] Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pringsheim, A. [1916] ‘Grundlagen der Allgemeinen Functionenlehre’, in Burkhardt, M., Wutinger, W. and Fricke, R. (eds.): Encyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 2. Erste Teil, Erste Halbband, pp. 1–53. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. [1951] Mathematical Logic. Revised edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. [1931] The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays. Edited by Braithwaite, R. B.. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Raschig, L. [1891] ‘Zum Eulerschen Theorem der Polyedrometrie’, Festschrift des Gymnasium Schneeberg.

Reichardt, H. [1941] ‘Losung der Aufgabe 274’, Jarhresberichte der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 51, p. 23.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. [1947] Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Reiff, R. [1889] Geschichte der Unendlichen Reihen. Tubingen: H. Laupp'schen.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, C. [1885] ‘Zu Möbius Polyedertheorie. Vorgelegt von F. Klein’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich-Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, 37, pp. 106–25.Google Scholar

Riemann, B. [1851] Grundlagen der eine Allgemeine Theorie der Functionen einer Veranderlichen Complexen Grösse (inaugural dissertation). In Weber, M. and Dedekind, R. (eds.): Gesammelte Mathematische Werke und Wissenschaftlicher Nachlass. Second edition. Leipzig: Teubner, 1892, pp. 3–48.Google Scholar

Riemann, B. [1868] ‘Über die Darstellbarkeit einer Function durch eine Trigonometrische Reihe’, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschafi der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 13, pp. 87–132.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. [1936] ‘Analysis in Greek Geometry’, Mind, 45, pp. 464–73.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. [1953] Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rudin, W. [1953] Principles of Mathematical Analysis. First edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Russell, B. [1901] ‘Recent Work in the Philosophy of Mathematics’, The International Monthly, 3. Reprinted as ‘Mathematics and the Metaphysicians’, in his [1918], pp. 59–74.

Russell, B. [1903] Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Russell, B. [1918] Mysticism and Logic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Russell, B. [1959] My Philosophical Development. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Russell, B. and Whitehead, A. N. [1910–13] Principia Mathematica. Vol. I, 1910; Vol. 2, 1912; Vol. 3, 1913. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Saks, S. [1933] Théori de L'Intégrale. English translation by L. C. Young: Theory of the Integral. Second edition. New York: Hamer, 1937.Google Scholar

Schläfli, L. [1852] ‘Theorie der Vielfachen Kontinuität’. Published posthumously in Neue Denkschriften der Allgemeinen Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für die Gesamten Naturwissenschaften, 38, pp. 1–237. Zürich, 1901.Google Scholar

Schröder, E. [1862] ‘Über die Vielecke von Gebrochener Seitenzahl oder die Bedeutung der Stern-Polygone in der Geometrie’, Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, 7, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar

Seidel, P. L. [1847] ‘Note über eine Eigenschaft der Reihen, welche Discontinuirliche Functionen Darstellen’, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Klasse der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 5, pp. 381–93.Google Scholar

Sextus Empiricus [c. 190] Against the Logicians. Greek text with an English translation by Bury, R. G.. London: Heinemann, 1933.Google Scholar

Sommerville, D. M. Y. [1929] An Introduction to the Geometry of N Dimensions. London: Dover, 1958.Google Scholar

Steiner, J. [1826] ‘Leichter Beweis eines Stereometrischen Satzes von Euler’, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 1, pp. 364–7.Google Scholar

Steinhaus, H. [1960] Mathematical Snapshots. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steinitz, E. [1914–31] ‘Polyeder und Raumeinteilungen’, in Meyer, W. F. and Mohrmann, H. (eds.): Encyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 3, AB. 12. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Stokes, G. [1848] ‘On the Critical Values of the Sums of Periodic Series’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8, pp. 533–83.Google Scholar

Szabó, Á. [1958] ‘“Deiknymi” als Mathematischer Terminus fur “Beweisen”’, Maia, N.S. 10, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Szabó, Á. [1960] ‘Anfänge des Euklidischen Axiomensystems’, Archive for the History of Exact Sciences, 1, pp. 37–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szökefalvi-Nagy, B. [1954] Valós Függvények és Függvénysorok. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar

Tarski, A. [1930a] ‘Über einige Fundamentale Begriffe der Metamathematik’, Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, 23, Cl. III, pp. 22–9. Published in English in J. H. Woodger (ed.) [1956], pp. 30–7.Google Scholar

Tarski, A. [1930b] ‘Fundamentale Begriffe der Methodologie der Deduktiven Wissenschaften, 1’, Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 37, pp. 361–404. Published in English in J. H. Woodger (ed.) [1956], pp. 60–109.Google Scholar

Tarski, A. [1935] ‘On the Concept of Logical Consequence’. Published in J. H. Woodger (ed.) [1956], pp. 409–20. This paper was read in Paris in 1935.

Tarski, A. [1941] Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1946. (This is a partially modified and extended version of On Mathematical Logic and Deductive Method, published in Polish in 1936 and in German translation in 1937.)Google Scholar

Turquette, A. [1950] ‘Gödel and the Synthetic A Priori’, The Journal of Philosophy, 47, pp. 125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waerden, B. L. van der [1941] ‘Topologie und Uniformisierung der Riemannschen Flächen’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich-Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, 93, pp. 147–60.Google Scholar

Whewell, W. [1858] History of Scientific Ideas. Vol. 1. (Part one of the third edition of The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences.)

Wilder, R. L. [1944] ‘The Nature of Mathematical Proof’, The American Mathematical Monthly, 52, pp. 309–23.Google Scholar

Woodger, J. H. (ed.) [1956] Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Young, W. H. [1903–4] ‘On Non-Uniform Convergence and Term-by-Term Integration of Series’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 1, second series, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar

Zacharias, M. [1914–31] ‘Elementargeometrie’, in Meyer, W. F. and Mohrmann, H. (eds.): Encyklopädie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 3, Erste Teil, Zweiter Halbband, pp. 862–1176. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Zygmund, A. [1935] Trigonometrical Series. New York: Chelsea, 1952.Google Scholar