Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:56:59.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Martin Peterson
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo, M. and Krueger, J. (2005). “Evidential Reasoning in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” The American Journal of Psychology, 118: 431–457.Google ScholarPubMed
Ahn, T.K., Isaac, R.M., and Salmon, T. (2008). “Endogenous Group Formation,” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 10: 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, T.K., Lee, M., Ruttan, L., and Walker, J. (2007). “Asymmetric Payoffs in Simultaneous and Sequential Prisoner's Dilemma Games,” Public Choice, 132: 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., and Makinson, D. (1985). “On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50: 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J.M. (2014). “Evolutionary Game Theory,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-evolutionary/ (accessed February 25, 2014).
Alexandrova, A. (2008). “Making Models Count,” Philosophy of Science, 75: 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allingham, M. (2002). Choice Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1988). “Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 37: 291–304.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. and Miller, J.H. (1993). “Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental Evidence,” The Economic Journal, 103: 570–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argiento, R., Pemantle, R., Skyrms, B., and Volkov, S. (2009). “Learning to Signal: Analysis of a Micro-Level Reinforcement Model,” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 119: 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, (1885). Politics (transl. Jowett, ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Arló-Costa, H. and Bicchieri, C. (2007). “Knowing and Supposing in Games of Perfect Information,” Studia Logica, 86: 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, K. and Zuberbühler, K. (2006). “The Alarm-Calling System of Adult Male Putty-Nosed Monkeys, Cercopithecus Nictitans Martini,” Animal Behaviour, 72: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, K. and Zuberbühler, K. (2008). “Meaningful Call Combinations in a Non-Human Primate,” Current Biology, 18: R202–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J. (1980). Trench Warfare 1914–1918. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. (1987). “Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality,” Econometrica, 55: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J. (1995). “Backward Induction and Common Knowledge of Rationality,” Games and Economic Behavior, 8: 6–9.Google Scholar
Aumann, R. and Maschler, M. (1995). Repeated Games with Incomplete Information. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). “The Evolution of Cooperation,” Science, 211: 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, P. (2004). “Trustworthiness and Competitive Altruism Can Also Solve the Tragedy of the Commons,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 25: 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, P. and Miller, R. (2007). “Partner Choice Creates Competitive Altruism in Humans,” Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 274: 749–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, J.A. (2007). “Dynamic Partitioning and the Conventionality of Kinds,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.A. (2009). “Faithful Description and the Incommensurability of Evolved Languages,” Philosophical Studies, 147: 123–137.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.A. (2013a). “On the Coevolution of Basic Arithmetic Language and Knowledge,” Erkenntnis, 78: 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.A. (2013b). “On the Coevolution of Theory and Language and the Nature of Successful Inquiry,” Erkenntnis online doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9466-z.CrossRef
Barrett, J.A. and Zollman, K. (2009). “The Role of Forgetting in the Evolution and Learning of Language,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 21: 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P. and Bonanno, G. (1999). “Recent Results on Belief, Knowledge and the Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory,” Research in Economics, 53: 149–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P. and Dufwenberg, M. (2009). “Dynamic Psychological Games,” Journal of Economic Theory, 144: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battigalli, P., Di Tillio, A. and Dov, S. (2013). “Strategies and Interactive Beliefs in Dynamic Games,” in Acemoglu, D., Arellano, M., and Dekel, E. (eds.), Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications: Tenth World Congress. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bayer, R. (2011). “Cooperation in Partnerships: The Role of Breakups and Reputation,” University of Adelaide School of Economics Research Paper No. 2011–22.
Bellany, I. (2003). “Men at War: The Sources of Morale,” RUSI Journal, 148: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J.L. (2009). Decision Theory and Rationality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, J.L. (2013). “Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem: Why Lewis's Argument Fails,” Analysis, 73: 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besanko, D. and Braeutigam, R. (2010). Microeconomics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2002). “Covenants Without Swords: Group Identity, Norms, and Communication in Social Dilemmas,” Rationality and Society, 14: 192–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. and Greene, M.S. (1997). “Symmetry Arguments for Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” in Holström-Hintikka, G. and Tuomela, R. (eds.), Contemporary Action Theory. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. and Greene, M.S. (1999). “Symmetry Arguments for Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” in Bicchieri, C., Jeffrey, R., and Skyrms, B. (eds.), The Logic of Strategy. Oxford University Press, pp. 175–195.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. and Lev-On, A. (2007). “Computer-Mediated Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: An Experimental Analysis,” Politics Philosophy Economics, 6: 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C., Lev-On, A., and Chavez, A. (2010). “The Medium or the Message? Communication Relevance and Richness in Trust Games,” Synthese, 176: 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (1991). “Bargaining and Morality,” in Gauthier, D. and Sugden, R. (eds.), Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract: Themes from Morals by Agreement. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 131–156.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (1994). Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (2001). “A Review of Robert Axelrod's The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/1/1/review1.html).Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (2005). Natural Justice. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (2006). “Why Do People Cooperate?Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 5 (1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (2007a). Playing for Real. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (2007b). Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (2011). Rational Decisions. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. and Shaked, A. (2010). “Experimental Economics: Where Next?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73: 87–100.Google Scholar
Board, O. (2004). “Dynamic Interactive Epistemology,” Games and Economic Behavior, 49: 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board, O. (2006). “The Equivalence of Bayes and Causal Rationality in Games,” Theory and Decision, 61: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G. and Ockenfels, A. (2000). “A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition,” American Economic Review, 90: 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, G. (2011). “AGM Belief Revision in Dynamic Games,” in Krzysztof, R.A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK XIII), ACM. New York, pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. (2013a). “Reasoning about Strategies and Rational Play in Dynamic Games,” in van Benthem, J., Ghosh, S., and Verbrugge, R. (eds.), Modeling Strategic Reasoning, Texts in Logic and Games. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. (2013b). “A Dynamic Epistemic Characterization of Backward Induction Without Counterfactuals,” Games and Economic Behavior, 78: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, G. (2013c). “An Epistemic Characterization of Generalized Backward Induction,” Working Paper No. 134, University of California Davis (http://ideas.repec.org/p/cda/wpaper/13–2.html).
Brams, S. (1975). “Newcomb's Problem and Prisoners' Dilemma,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19: 496–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburger, A. and Friedenberg, A. (2008). “Intrinsic Correlation in Games,” Journal of Economic Theory, 141: 28–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Brooks, M. (2007a). “Esteem-Based Contributions and Optimality in Public Goods Supply,” Public Choice, 130: 457–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Brooks, M. (2007b). “Esteem, Norms of Participation and Public Good Supply,” in Baake, P. and Borck, R. (eds.), Public Economics and Public Choice: Contributions in Honor of Charles B. Blankart. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Pettit, P. (2004). The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G. and Tullock, G. (1982). “An Economic Theory of Military Tactics: Methodological Individualism at War,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3: 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R., and Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining Norms. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (1987). “Utilitarianism and Expected Utility,” Journal of Philosophy, 84: 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (2012). Climate Matters: Ethics in a Warming World (Norton Global Ethics Series). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1965/1999). “Ethical Rules, Expected Values, and Large Numbers,” Ethics, 76: 1–13. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 1. The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc., pp. 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1967/2001). “Cooperation and Conflict in Public-Goods Interaction,” Western Economic Journal, 5: 109–121. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 15. Externalities and Public Expenditure Theory. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc., pp. 227–243.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1968/1999). The Demand and Supply of Public GoodsChicago: Rand McNally & Co. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 5. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1975/2000). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 7. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1978/1999). “Markets, States, and the Extent of Moral,” American Economic Review 68: 364–378. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 1. The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc., pp. 360–367.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M. (1983/2001). “Moral Community and Moral Order: The Intensive and Extensive Limits of Interaction,” in Miller, H.B. and Williams, W.H. (eds.), Ethics and Animals. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 95–102. Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. Vol. 17. Moral Science and Moral Order. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc., pp. 202–10.Google Scholar
Bull, M. (2012). “What is the Rational Response?London Review of Books, 34, May 24, 2012.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1790). Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Dodsley.Google Scholar
Cable, D. and Shane, S. (1997). “A Prisoner's Dilemma Approach to Entrepreneur–Venture Capitalist Relationships,” The Academy of Management Review, 22: 142–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Charness, G. and Yang, C.L. (2014). “Starting Small Toward Voluntary Formation of Efficient Large Groups in Public Goods Provision,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102: 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, J. (2008). “Compensation Principle,” in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., and Kallgren, C.A. (1991). “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior,” in Zanna, M.P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. XXIV. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T., and Putterman, L. (2005). “Cooperation Under the Threat of Expulsion in a Public Goods Experiment,” Journal of Public Economics, 89: 1421–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausing, T. (2004). “Belief Revision in Games of Perfect Information,” Economics and Philosophy, 20: 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, K. and Stephens, D. (1995). “Testing Models of Non-kin Cooperation: Mutualism and the Prisoner's Dilemma,” Animal Behaviour, 50: 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Climate Change: Evidence & Causes: An Overview from the Royal Society and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, April 2014. Available at http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/exec-office-other/climate-change-full.pdf.
Corbae, D. and Duffy, J. (2008). “Experiments with Network Formation,” Games and Economic Behavior, 64: 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croson, R., Fatás, E., and Neugebauer, T. (2006). Excludability and Contribution: A Laboratory Study in Team Production. Mimeo, pp. 411–427.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2014). “Political Rifts Slow U.S. Effort on Climate Laws,” The New York Times, April 15, 2014.
Davis, D.D. and Holt, C.A. (1994). “Equilibrium Cooperation in Three-Person, Choice-of-Partner Games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 7: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. and Perkowitz, W.T. (1979). “Consequences of Responsiveness in Dyadic Interaction: Effects of Probability of Response and Proportion of Content–Related Responses on Interpersonal Attraction,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. H. (1977). “Prisoners, Paradox, and Rationality,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 14: 319–327.Google Scholar
Davis, L. H. (1985). “Is the Symmetry Argument Valid?” in Campbell, R. and Snowden, L. (eds.), Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation. University of British Columbia Press, pp. 255–262.Google Scholar
Dawes, R.M. (1975). “Formal Models of Dilemmas in Social Decision Making,” in Kaplan, M.F. and Schwartz, S. (eds.), Human Judgment and Decision Processes: Formal and Mathematical Approaches. New York: Academic Press, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (2010). “The Conditionals of Deliberation,” Mind, 119: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desforges, D.M., Lord, C.G., Ramsey, S.L., Mason, J.A., Leeuwen, M.D. Van, West, S.C., and Lepper, M.R. (1991). “Effects of Structured Cooperative Contact on Changing Negative Attitudes toward Stigmatized Social Groups,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 531–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixit, A. and Skeath, S. (1999). Games of Strategy. London: Norton.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. (2001). Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, E. (1981). “Causality, Utility, and Decision,” Synthese, 48: 295–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrhart, K.M. and Keser, C. (1999). Mobility and Cooperation: On the Run (No. 99–69). Sonderforschungsbereich 504. Universität Mannheim.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R.C. (1993). “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal, 102: 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2007). Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erev, I. and Roth, A.E. (1998). “Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria,” American Economic Review, 88: 848–881.Google Scholar
Erickson, P., Klein, J., Daston, L., Lemov, R., Sturm, T., and Gordin, M. D. (2013). How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehl, K, van der Post, D.J., and Semmann, D. (2011). “Co-evolution of Behaviour and Social Network Structure Promotes Human Cooperation,” Ecology Letters, 14: 546–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000). “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments,” American Economic Review, 90: 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. (1999). “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M. (1998). The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, B. (1996). “The Use of Internal Games: The Case of Addiction,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 17: 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J.A. (1970). “I Get by with a Little Help from my Friends,” World Politics, 23: 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, N., Hunt, T., Oppenheimer, J.A., and Wagner, R.H. (1975). “Individual Contributions for Collective Goods: Alternative Models,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19: 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1994). “Assure and Threaten,” Ethics, 104: 690–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D., and Stacchetti, E. (1989). “Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality,” Games and Economic Behavior, 1: 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. (2008). “Methodology as Ideology: Some comments on Robert Axelrod's The Evolution of Co-operation,” QA-Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, 167–176.
Gibbard, A. (2008). Reconciling Our Aims: In Search of Bases for Ethics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. and Harper, W. (1978). “Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility,” in Harper, W., Stalnaker, R., and Pearce, G. (eds.), Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 153–190.Google Scholar
Gilboa, I. (1999). “Can Free Choice be Known?” in Bicchieri, C., Jeffrey, R., and Skyrms, B. (eds.), The Logic of Strategy. Oxford University Press, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
Gillis, J. (2013). “Climate Maverick to Retire from NASA,” The New York Times, April 1, 2013.
Gillis, J. (2014). “Climate Efforts Falling Short, U.N. Panel Says,” The New York Times, April 14, 2014: 2–14.
Ginet, C. (1962). “Can the Will be Caused?The Philosophical Review, 71: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1970. A Theory of Human Action. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Govindan, S. and Wilson, R. (2008). “Nash Equilibrium, Refinements of,” in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gowa, J. (1986). “Anarchy, Egoism, and Third Images: The Evolution of Cooperation and International Relations,” International Organization, 40: 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnthorsdottir, A., Houser, D., and McCabe, K. (2007). “Disposition, History and Contributions in Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62: 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Levati, M.V., Sutter, M., and Heijden, E. van der (2007). “Leading by Example with and Without Exclusion Power in Voluntary Contribution Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics, 91: 1023–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L., Johansson, P., and Strandberg, T. (2012). “Lifting the Veil of Morality: Choice Blindness and Attitude Reversals on a Self-Transforming Survey,” PLoS ONE 7 (9): e45457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, L., Johansson, P., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., and Deutgen, T. (2010). “Magic at the Marketplace: Choice Blindness for the Taste of Jam and the Smell of Tea,” Cognition, 117: 54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, J. (1999). “Hypothetical Knowledge and Counterfactual Reasoning,” International Journal of Game Theory, 28: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, J. (2001). “Substantive Rationality and Backward Induction,” Games and Economic Behavior, 37: 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, C. (2013). Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1964a). “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W.D. (1964b). “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. II,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 17–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J. (1986). Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. (1987). “Free-Rider Problems in the Production of Collective Goods,” Economics and Philosophy, 3: 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, 162: 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Hargreaves-Heap, S. and Varoufakis, Y. (2004). Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harper, W.L. (1988). “Causal Decision Theory and Game Theory: A Classic Argument for Equilibrium Solutions, a Defense of Weak Equilibria, and a Limitation for the Normal Form Representation,” in Harper, W.L. and Skyrms, B. (eds.), Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, II. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 246–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, E. and Nagel, R. (2001). “Choice of Partners in Multiple Two-Person Prisoner's Dilemma Games: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45: 770–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. (2008). “Fairness and Social Norms,” Philosophy of Science, 75: 850–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. (2012). Preference, Value, Choice and Welfare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R.J. (1970). “On the Law of Effect,” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13: 243–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobbes, T. (1651/1928). Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, D. (1983). “Metamagical Themes,” Scientific American, 248: 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. (1981). “Counterfactuals and Newcomb's Problem,” Journal of Philosophy, 78: 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.) (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings Volume I (1867–1893). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Edited by Selby-Bigge, L.A.. Revised by P. Nidditch. First published 1739.)Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. (1991). “Newcomb's Problem, Prisoners' Dilemma, and Collective Action,” Synthese, 86: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, S. L. (1994). “A New Take from Nozick on Newcomb's Problem and Prisoners' Dilemma,” Analysis, 54: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttegger, S.M., Skyrms, B., Tarrès, P., Wagner, E.O. (2014). “Some Dynamics of Signaling Games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0709640104. Accessed March 21, 2014.CrossRef
International Monetary Fund (2013). “Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications,” January. 28, 2013. Available at www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/012813.pdf.
Isaac, R.M., Schmidtz, D., and Walker, J. (1989). “The Assurance Problem in a Laboratory Market,” Public Choice, 62: 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1896). “A Will to Believe,” The New World, 5. Available at www.philosophyonline.co.uk/oldsite/pages/will.ht
Jeffrey, R.C. (1983). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jerome, K.J. (1889). Three Men in a Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog). Bristol: Arrowsmith.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978). “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, 30(2): 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Tärning, B., Sikström, S., and Chater, N. (2013). “Choice Blindness and Preference Change: You Will Like This Paper Better If You (Believe You) Chose to Read It!Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1807.Google Scholar
Johnson, D., Stopka, P., and Bell, J. (2002). “Individual Variation Evades the Prisoner's Dilemma,” BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2: 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, J.M. (2002). “Levi on Causal Decision Theory and the Possibility of Predicting One's Own Actions,” Philosophical Studies, 110: 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadane, J.B. and Seidenfeld, T. (1999). “Equilibrium, Common Knowledge, and Optimal Sequential Decisions,” in Kadane, J.B., Schervish, M.J., and Seidenfeld, T. (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Statistics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, MA: Hackett. (Ed. Ellington, J.W.. First published 1785.)Google Scholar
Karmei, K. and Putterman, L. (2013). “Play It Again: Partner Choice, Reputation Building and Learning in Restarting, Finitely-Repeated Dilemma Games,” draft, Brown University.
Kavka, G.S. (1991). “Is individual Choice Less Problematic Than Collective Choice?Economics and Philosophy, 7:143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, G.S. (1993). “Internal Prisoner's Dilemma Vindicated,” Economics and Philosophy, 9: 171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1981). “Explanatory Unification,” Philosophy of Science, 48: 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1993). “The Evolution of Human Altruism,” Journal of Philosophy, 10: 497–516.Google Scholar
Koertge, N. (1975). “Popper's Metaphysical Research Program for the Human Sciences,” Inquiry, 18: 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolbert, E. (2014). “Rough Forecasts,” The New Yorker, April 14, 2014.
Kreps, D.M. and Wilson, R.. (1982). “Sequential Equilibria,” Econometrica, 50: 863–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. (2014). “The Big Green Test,” The New York Times, June 22, 2014.Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. (2009). “Prisoner's Dilemma,” in Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring 2009 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/prisoner-dilemma/.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledwig, M. (2005). “The No Probabilities for Acts Principle,” Synthese, 144: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J. (1995). “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research,” in Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, I. (1986). Hard Choices. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. (1997). The Covenant of Reason: Rationality and the Commitments of Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, S. and List, J. (2007). “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21: 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-On, A., Chavez, A., and Bicchieri, C. (2010). “Group and Dyadic Communication in Trust Games,” Rationality and Society, 22: 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). “Prisoners' Dilemma is a Newcomb Problem,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8: 235–240.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1981). “Causal Decision Theory,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linster, B. (1992). “Evolutionary Stability in the Infinitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma Played by Two-state Moore Machines,” Southern Economic Journal, 58: 880–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, J.L. (1959). “Communication, the Development of Trust, and Cooperative Behavior,” Human Relations, 12: 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R.D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
McAdams, R. (2009). “Beyond the Prisoner's Dilemma: Co-ordination, Game Theory, and Law,” Southern California Law Review, 82: 209.Google Scholar
McClennen, E.F. (2008). “Rethinking Rationality,” in Verbeek, B. (ed.), Reasons and Intentions. Leiden: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 37–65.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. (1989).The End of Nature. London: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. (2001). “Some Like it Hot: Bush in the Greenhouse,” The New York Review of Books, July 5, 2001: 38.
MacLean, D. (1983). “A Moral Requirement for Energy Policies,” Energy and the Future, 180–197.
Mahanarayan, (1888). Urdu jest book: Lata'if-e Akbar, Hissah pahli: Birbar namah (translated from the Urdu by Pritchett, F.W.). Delhi: Matba´Jauhar-e Hind (India Office Library 1144 VT).Google Scholar
Maier, N.R.F. (1931). “Reasoning in Humans II: The Solution of a Problem and its Appearance in Consciousness,” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12: 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier-Rigaud, F., Martinsson, P., and Staffiero, G. (2010). “Ostracism and the Provision of a Public Good: Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 73: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majolo, B., Ames, K., Brumpton, R., Garratt, R., Hall, K., and Wilson, N. (2006). “Human Friendship Favours Cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma,” Behaviour, 143: 1383–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, P. (2011). “Explanation in Mathematics,” in Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2011 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/mathematics-explanation/.Google Scholar
Marwell, G. and Ames, R. (1981). “Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?Journal of Public Economics, 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michihiro, K. (2008). “Repeated Games,” in Durlauf, S. and Blume, L. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. (2012). The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulin, H. (2004). Fair Division and Collective Welfare. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munger, K. and Harris, S.J. (1989). “Effects of an Observer on Handwashing in a Public Restroom,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69: 733–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. and Peacock, A.T. (eds.) (1958). Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. (1950). Non-Cooperative Games, Princeton University. (Diss.)Google Scholar
Nash, J. (1951). “Non-Cooperative Games,” Annals of Mathematics, 54: 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. and Wilson, T. (1977). “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review, 84: 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2007). “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate,” Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (3): 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2008). A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (2013). The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Northcott, R. and Alexandrova, A. (2009). “Progress in Economics,” in Ross, D. and Kincaid, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press, pp. 306–337.Google Scholar
Northcott, R. and Alexandrova, A. (2013). “It's Just a Feeling: Why Economic Models Do Not Explain,” Journal of Economic Methodology, 20: 262–267.Google Scholar
Northcott, R. and Alexandrova, A. (2014). “Armchair Science,” manuscript.
Nowak, M.A. and May, R.M. (1992). “Evolutionary Games and Spatial Chaos,” Nature, 359 (6398): 826–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M.A. and May, R.M. (1993). “The Spatial Dilemmas of Evolution,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 3: 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M.A. and Sigmund, K. (1999). “Phage-lift for Game Theory,” Nature, 398: 367–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M.A., and Sigmund, K. (2005). “Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity,” Nature, 437: 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nozick, R. (1969). “Newcomb's Problem and Two Principles of Choice,” in Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J.A. (2012). Principles of Politics: A Rational Choice Theory Guide to Politics and Social Justice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, J.M. and Dawes, R.M. (1993). “Social Welfare, Cooperators' Advantage, and the Option of Not Playing the Game,” American Sociological Review, 58: 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, J.M., Schwartz-Shea, P., and Simmons, R.T. (1984). “Do Cooperators Exit More Readily than Defectors?American Political Science Review, 78: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J.M. and Rubinstein, A. (1994). A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouattaraa, K., Lemassona, A., and Zuberbühlerd, K. (2009). “Campbell's Monkeys Concatenate Vocalizations into Context-Specific Call Sequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(51): 22026Ð22031, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908118106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Page, T., Putterman, L., and Unel, B. (2005). “Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry, and Efficiency,” Economic Journal, 115 (506): 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, R. (2009). “Knowledge, Games and Tales from the East,” in Ramanujam, R. and Sarukkai, S. (eds.), Logic and Its Applications, Third Indian Conference, ICLA 2009, Chennai, India, January 7–11, 2009. Proceedings. Springer: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
Paulson, H. Jr. (2014). “The Coming Climate Crash: Lessons for Climate Change in the 2008 Recession,” The New York Times, June 21, 2014.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. (2006). “Indeterminate Preferences,” Philosophical Studies, 130: 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. (2009). An Introduction to Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. (1988). “The Prisoner's Dilemma is an Unexploitable Newcomb Problem,” Synthese, 76: 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C.R. (1982). “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 20: 1485–1527.Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993). “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review, 83: 1281–1302.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. (2000). “Backward Induction in Games: On an Attempt at Logical Reconstruction,” in Rabinowicz, W. (ed.), Value and Choice: Some Common Themes in Decision Theory and Moral Philosophy. University of Lund Philosophy Reports, pp. 243–256.Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, W. (2002). “Does Practical Deliberation Crowd Out Self-prediction?Erkenntnis, 57: 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F.P. (1926/1931). “Truth and Probability,” The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Kegan Paul, pp. 156–198.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F.P. (1928/1931). “Further Considerations,” The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Kegan Paul, pp. 199–211.Google Scholar
Rand, D.G., Arbesman, S., and Christakis, N.A. (2011). “Dynamic Social Networks Promote Cooperation in Humans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108: 19193–19198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1966). Two-Person Game Theory. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, J. (2012). “The Explanation Paradox,” Journal of Economic Methodology, 19: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, A. and Ule, A. (2013). “Competition for Partners Drives Cooperation among Strangers,” paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Social Dilemmas Conference, CalTech.
Riedl, A., Rohde, I., and Strobel, M. (2011). “Efficient Coordination in Weakest-Link Games,” IZA Discussion Paper 6223.
Risjord, M. (2005). “Reasons, Causes, and Action Explanation,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35: 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, A. (1990). “Efficiency in Evolutionary Games: Darwin, Nash, and the Secret Handshake,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144: 379–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, D. (2011). Age of Fracture. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (2009). “Integrating the Dynamics of Multi-Scale Economic Agency,” in Kincaid, H. and Ross, D. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics. Oxford, pp. 245–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A.E. and Erev, I. (1995). “Learning in Extensive Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamical Models in the Immediate Term,” Games and Economic Behavior, 8: 164–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J. (1984). A Discourse on Inequality, trans. M. Cranston. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A. (2012). Economic Fables. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, A. and Salant, Y. (2008). “Some Thoughts on the Principle of Revealed Preference,” in Caplin, A. and Schotter, A. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Methodology. Oxford University Press, pp. 116–124.Google Scholar
Sagoff, M. (2008). The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment, second edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sally, D. (1995). “Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992,” Rationality and Society, 7: 58–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1954). “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 387–389.Google Scholar
Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M., and Skyrms, B. (2011). “Co-evolution of Pre-Play Signaling and Cooperation,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 274: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sautter, J., Littvay, L., and Bearnes, B. (2007). “A Dual-Edged Sword: Empathy and Collective Action in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, The Biology of Political Behavior, 614: 154–171.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T.C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.C. (1973). “Hockey Helmets, Concealed Weapons, and Daylight Saving: A Study of Binary Choices with Externalities,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17: 381–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (1995). “Observing the Unobservable,” in Little, D. (ed.), On the Reliability of Economic Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 147–172.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (2014). “Adam Smith on Freedom,” in Hanley, R. (ed.), Princeton Guide To Adam Smith. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. and Willott, E. (2003). “Reinventing the Commons: An African Case Study,” University of California Davis Law Review, 37: 203–232.Google Scholar
Schultz, K. (2001). Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1977). “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6: 317–344.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and Freedom. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. (1958). Time in Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954). “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System,” The American Political Science Review, 48 (3): 787–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shick, F. (1979). “Self knowledge, Uncertainty and Choice,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 30: 235–252.Google Scholar
Shin, H.S. (1992). “Counterfactuals and a Theory of Equilibrium in Games,” in Bicchieri, C. and Chiara, M.L. Dalla (eds.), Knowledge, Belief and Strategic Interaction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–413.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1980). Causal Necessity: A Pragmatic Investigation of the Necessity of Laws. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1982). “Causal Decision Theory,” Journal of Philosophy, 79: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2001). “The Stag Hunt.” Presidential Address, Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association. www.socsci.uci.edu/~bskyrms/bio/papers/StagHunt.pdf (accessed June 26, 2014).CrossRef
Skyrms, B. (2002). “Signals, Evolution, and the Explanatory Power of Transient Information,” Philosophy of Science, 69: 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2004). The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of the Social Structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2006). “Signals,” Philosophy of Science, 75: 489–500.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals Evolution, Learning, & Information. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Millar, A., Kincaid, A., and Bell, J.. New York: A.M. Kelley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, J.H. (1985). “Not Every Prisoner's Dilemma is a Newcomb Problem,” in Campbell, R. and Sowden, L. (eds.), Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, J.H. (1986). “Notes on Decision Theory: Old Wine in New Bottles,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64: 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontuoso, A. (2013). “A Dynamic Model of Belief-Dependent Conformity to Social Norms,” MPRA Paper 53234, University Library of Munich.
Spinoza, B. (1677/1985). Collected Works of Spinoza. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spohn, W. (1977). “Where Luce and Krantz Do Really Generalize Savage's Decision Model,” Erkenntnis, 11: 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, W. (1999). Strategic Rationality, vol. XXIV of Forschungsberichte der DFG-Forschergruppe Logik in der Philosophie. Konstanz University.Google Scholar
Spohn, W. (2003). “Dependency Equilibria and the Causal Structure of Decision and Game Situations,” Homo Oeconomicus, 20: 195–255.Google Scholar
Spohn, W. (2007). “Dependency Equilibria,” Philosophy of Science, 74: 775–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, W. (2010). “From Nash to Dependency Equilibria,” in Bonanno, G., Löwe, B., and Hoek, W. van der (eds.), Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory–LOFT8, Texts in Logic and Games. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
Spohn, W. (2012). “Reversing 30 Years of Discussion: Why Causal Decision Theorists Should One-box,” Synthese, 187: 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1968). “A Theory of Conditionals”, in Rescher, N. (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 98–112.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1996). “Knowledge, Belief and Counterfactual Reasoning in Games,” Economics and Philosophy, 12: 133–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. (ed.) (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. (2007). “Of Montreal and Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols,” Harvard Environmental Law Review, 31: 1.Google Scholar
Sylwester, K. and Roberts, G. (2010). “Contributors Benefit Through Reputation-Based Partner Choice in Economic Games,” Biology Letters, 6: 659–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. (1987). The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (1990). “Cooperation and Rationality: Notes on the Collective Action Problem and its Solution,” in Cooks, K.S. and Levi, M. (eds.), The Limits of Rationality. London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 222–240.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. and Ward, H. (1982). “Chickens, Whales and Lumpy Goods: Alternative Models of Public Goods Provision,” Political Studies, 30: 350–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.D. and Jonker, L.B. (1978). “Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics,” Mathematical Biosciences, 40: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R. (2008). Free Riding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, P. and Chao, L. (1999). “‘Prisoner's Dilemma’ in an RNA virus,” Nature, 398: 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Global Change Research Program (2014). “The National Climate Assessment,” http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/
Van den Assem, M.J., Van Dolder, D., and Thaler, R.H. (2012). “Split or Steal? Cooperative Behavior when the Stakes are Large,” Management Science, 58(1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waert, S. (2003). The Discovery of Global Warming. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, H. (1990). “Three Men in a Boat, Two Must Row: An Analysis of the Three Person Chicken Pregame,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34: 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Suri, S., and Watts, D. (2012). “Cooperation and Assortativity with Dynamic Partner Updating,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109: 14363–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, R. (2006). “Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination in Large Groups,” American Economic Review, 96: 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, P. (2001). Decision Space: Multidimensional Utility Analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, P. (2010). Collective Rationality: Equilibrium in Cooperative Games. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, P. (2008). “Causal Decision Theory,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/decision-causal/.
Weisberg, M. (2012). Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. (2007). “A Review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change,” Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 703–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M.L. (2013). “The Odds of Disaster: An Economist's Warning on Global Warming,” published on Making Sense, PBS News Hour, May 23, 2013. Available at www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/the-odds-of-disaster-an-econom-1/.
Wicksell, K. (1896/1958). “A New Principle of Just Taxation,” in Musgrave, R.A. and Peacock, A.T. (eds.), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Macmillan and Co., pp. 72–118.Google Scholar
Winch, D.M. (1971). Analytical Welfare Economics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zambrano, E. (2004). “Counterfactual Reasoning and Common Knowledge of Rationality in Normal Form Games,” Topics in Theoretical Economics, 4 (1), article 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, C.-B., Loewenstein, J., and Murnighan, K. (2007). “Speaking the Same Language: The Cooperative Effects of Labeling in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51: 431–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Martin Peterson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: The Prisoner's Dilemma
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360174.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Martin Peterson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: The Prisoner's Dilemma
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360174.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Martin Peterson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: The Prisoner's Dilemma
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360174.016
Available formats
×