Book contents
- Power in Close Relationships
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Power in Close Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Power in Close Relationships
- Part I Power in Close Relationships: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Power in Close Relationships: Interpersonal Contexts
- Index
- References
Part I - Power in Close Relationships: Theoretical Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2019
Book contents
- Power in Close Relationships
- Advances in Personal Relationships
- Power in Close Relationships
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Power in Close Relationships
- Part I Power in Close Relationships: Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Power in Close Relationships: Interpersonal Contexts
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Power in Close Relationships , pp. 7 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, J., Alberts, S. C., Haines, S. A., Dubach, J., Muruth, P., Coote, T., … & Bruford, M. W. (1996). Behavior predicts genetic structure in a wild primate group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 5795–5801.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009a). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009b). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 764–771.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094–1110.Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology, 16, 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status: Biological approaches to mind and culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Berg, S. J., & Wynne-Edwards, K. E. (2001). Changes in testosterone, cortisol, and estradiol levels in men becoming fathers. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76, 582–592.Google Scholar
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Sex differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. L. (1986). Despotism and differential reproduction: A Darwinian view of history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Booth, A., & Dabbs, J. M. (1993). Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces, 72, 463–477.Google Scholar
Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1990) Affective bias in children's perceptions of dominance relationships. Child Development, 61, 221–229.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P., & Jones, B. C. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 381–389.Google Scholar
Bulger, J., & Hamilton, W. J. (1987). Rank and density correlates of inclusive fitness measures in a natural Chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) troop. International Journal of Primatology, 8, 635–650.Google Scholar
Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. C. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44, 119–122.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind, 5th edn. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In Schaller, M., Kenrick, D. T., & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263–286). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E. (1998). Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 209–228.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. T., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). Toward a unified science of hierarchy: Dominance and prestige are two fundamental pathways to human social rank. In Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Anderson, C. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 334–347.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.Google Scholar
Cummins, D. (2005). Dominance, status, and hierarchies. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dawood, S., Dowgwillo, E. A., Wu, L. Z., & Pincus, A. L. (2018). Contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 171–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
de Kwaadsteniet, E. W., & van Dijk, E. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515–524.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Price, J. M., Bachorowski, J. A., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Hostile attribution biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 385–392.Google Scholar
Edelstein, R. S., van Anders, S. M., Chopik, W. J., Goldey, K. L., & Wardecker, B. M. (2014). Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples. Hormones and Behavior, 65, 401–407.Google Scholar
Egan, V., & Angus, S. (2004). Is social dominance a sex-specific strategy for infidelity? Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 575–586.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfelt, I. (1961). The fighting behavior of animals. Scientific American, 205, 112–121.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In Fiske, S. T., Lindzey, G., & Gilbert, D. T. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed. pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., Corter, C., Stallings, J., & Steiner, M. (2002). Testosterone and prolactin are associated with emotional responses to infant cries in new fathers. Hormones and Behavior, 42, 399–413.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.Google Scholar
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory of social exchange. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T., & Carson, R. C. (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology (pp. 99–131). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Forrest, M. S., & Hokanson, J. E. (1975). Depression and autonomic arousal reduction accompanying self-punitive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84, 346–357.Google Scholar
Fournier, M. A. (2009). Adolescent hierarchy formation and the social competition theory of depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 1144–1172.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Glutton-Brock, T. H., & Vincent, A. C. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58–60.Google Scholar
Goldhamer, H., & Shils, E. A. (1939). Types of power and status. American Journal of Sociology, 45, 171–182.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., Kahlenberg, S. M., Barrett, E. S., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 193–201.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., Mcintyre, M. H., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2004). Human male pair bonding and testosterone. Human Nature, 15, 119–131.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Ornstein, S. (1983). High status job title compensation for underpayment: A test of equity theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 285–297.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 980–994.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167–176.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H., & Bower, A. R. (2018). Social hierarchies. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 3. Applications of personality and individual differences (pp. 235–252). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of Prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196.Google Scholar
Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In Page, M. M. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Personality: Current theory and research (pp. 55–89). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Blickle, G. (2018). Socioanalytic theory: Basic concepts, supporting evidence, and practical implications. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 1. The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 110–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G., & West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427–440.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. T., Burk, J. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 345–351.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D., & Morley, J. (2003). The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 653–664.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451–463.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2011). Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 365–369.Google Scholar
Kyl-Heku, L. M., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 497–517.Google Scholar
Lange, J., Blatz, L., & Crusius, J. (2018). Dispositional envy: A conceptual review. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 424–440). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Le Boeuf, B. L., & Reiter, J. (1988). Lifetime reproductive success in Northern Elephant seals. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (Ed.), Reproductive success (pp. 344–362). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Diebels, K. J. (2014). The pursuit of status: A self-presentational perspective on the quest for social value. In Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Anderson, C. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 159–178). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Lee, M. T., & Ofshe, R. (1981). The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 73–82.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harpers.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., Sedikides, C., & De Waal-Andrews, W. G. (2016). Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders: Comparing hierometer and sociometer theories of self-regard. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 334.Google Scholar
Mascaro, O., & Csibra, G. (2014). Human infants’ learning of social structures the case of dominance hierarchy. Psychological Science, 25, 250–255.Google Scholar
Mazur, A. (1973). A cross-species comparison of status in small established groups. American Sociological Review, 38, 513–530.Google Scholar
Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64, 377–402.Google Scholar
Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, male testosterone. Social Forces, 77, 315–330.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.Google Scholar
Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–553.Google Scholar
Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pérusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–283.Google Scholar
Pérusse, D. (1994). Mate choice in modern societies: Testing evolutionary hypotheses with behavioral data. Human Nature, 5, 255–278.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Poole, J. H. (1989). Mate guarding, reproductive success and female choice in African elephants. Animal Behaviour, 37, 842–849.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.Google Scholar
Redfield, R. (1960). How society operates. In Shapiro, H. L. (Ed.), Man, culture, and society (pp. 345–368). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy when hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23, 669–677.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.Google Scholar
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648–652.Google Scholar
Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1922). Beitrage zur sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns [Contributions the social psychology of domestic chickens]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 88, 225–252.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Tracy, J. L. (2009). Knowing who's boss: Implicit perceptions of status from the nonverbal expression of pride. Emotion, 9, 631–639.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The dominance dilemma: Do women really prefer dominant mates? Personal Relationships, 15, 425–444.Google Scholar
Storey, A. E., Walsh, C. J., Quinton, R. L., & Wynne-Edwards, K. E. (2000). Hormonal correlates of paternal responsiveness in new and expectant fathers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 79–95.Google Scholar
Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 159–163.Google Scholar
Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 354–365.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thomsen, L., Frankenhuis, W. E., Ingold-Smith, M., & Carey, S. (2011). Big and mighty: Preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance. Science, 331, 477–480.Google Scholar
Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 149–164.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2005). Can children recognize pride? Emotion, 5, 251–257.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. L., Shariff, A. F., & Cheng, J. T. (2010). A naturalist's view of pride. Emotion Review, 2, 163–177.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2006). Relationship status and testosterone in North American heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31, 715–723.Google Scholar
von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 402–415.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Highfill, L. (2017). The interpersonal circumplex: A complementary approach for understanding animal personality. In Vonk, J., Weiss, A., & Kuczaj, S. (Eds.), Personality in non-human animals (pp. 39–53). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Myers, E. M. (2009). Is high self-esteem a path to the White House? The implicit theory of self-esteem and the willingness to vote for presidential candidates. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 14–19.Google Scholar
Zeigler-Hill, V., & Myers, E. M. (2011). An implicit theory of self-esteem: The consequences of perceived self-esteem for romantic desirability. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 147–180.Google Scholar
Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L. L. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How can an understanding of evolutionary psychology contribute to social psychology? In Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L. L. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., Wells, R. S., Bao, W., Zhu, S., … & Li, P. (2003). The genetic legacy of the Mongols. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 717–721.Google Scholar
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Walls, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alonso-Arbiol, I., Shaver, P. R., & Yarnoz, S. (2002). Insecure attachment, gender roles, and interpersonal dependence in the Basque Country. Personal Relationships, 9, 479–490.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Luchies, L. B. (2014). Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 398–405.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Reed, J. T., Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Relationship perceptions and persistence: Do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1045–1065.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., & Rusbult, C. E. (1998). Standing in my partner's shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 927–948.Google Scholar
Attridge, M., Berscheid, E., & Simpson, J. A. (1995) Predicting relationship stability from both partners versus one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 254–268.Google Scholar
Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243–267.Google Scholar
Beck, L. A., Pietromonaco, P. R., DeBuse, C. J., Powers, S. I., & Sayer, A. G. (2013). Spouses’ attachment pairings predict neuroendocrine, behavioral, and psychological responses to marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 388.Google Scholar
Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1617–1627.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929–943.Google Scholar
Bouthillier, D., Julien, D., Dube, M., Belanger, I., & Hamelin, M. (2002). Predictive validity of adult attachment measures in relation to emotion regulation behaviors in marital interactions. Journal of Adult Development, 9, 291–305.Google Scholar
Bradford, S. A., Feeney, J. A., & Campbell, L. (2002). Links between attachment orientations and dispositional and diary–based measures of disclosure in dating couples: A study of actor and partner effects. Personal Relationships, 9, 491–506.Google Scholar
Bugental, D. B. (2010). Paradoxical power manifestations: Power assertion by the subjectively powerless. In Guinote, A. & Vescio, T. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 209–230). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Butzer, B., & Campbell, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141–154.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2001). Attachment orientations, dependence, and behavior in a stressful situation: An application of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 821–843.Google Scholar
Carnelley, K. B., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Jaffe, K. (1996). Attachment, caregiving, and relationship functioning in couples: Effects of self and partner. Personal Relationships, 3, 257–278.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L. J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development, 65, 971–981.Google Scholar
Cavallo, J. V., Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2013). Regulating interpersonal risk. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 116–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantazaro, A., & Wei, M. (2010) Adult attachment, dependence, self-criticism, and depressive symptoms: A test of a mediational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1135–1162.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832.Google Scholar
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.Google Scholar
Cook, W. L. (1993). Interdependence and the interpersonal sense of control: An analysis of family relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 587–601.Google Scholar
Creasey, G. (2002). Associations between working models of attachment and conflict management behavior in romantic couples. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 365–375.Google Scholar
Cross, E. J., & Overall, N. C. (2018). Women's attraction to benevolent sexism: Needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 336–347.Google Scholar
Cross, E. J., Overall, N. C., & Hammond, M. D. (2016). Perceiving partners to endorse benevolent sexism attenuates highly anxious women's negative reactions to conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 923–940.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M., Hicks, A. M., & Otter-Henderson, K. (2006). Physiological evidence for repressive coping among avoidantly attached adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 205–229.Google Scholar
Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand-withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In Noller, P. & Feeney, J. A. (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., Overall, N. C., & Shallcross, S. L. (2016). Buffering avoidantly attached romantic partners in strain test situations. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 580–591.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22, 387–413.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950–968.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C., Collins, N. L., Van Vleet, M., & Tomlinson, J. M. (2013). Motivations for providing a secure base: Links with attachment orientation and secure base support behavior. Attachment & Human Development, 15, 261–280.Google Scholar
Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295.Google Scholar
Felson, R. B., & Outlaw, M. C. (2007). The control motive and marital violence. Violence and Victims, 22, 387–407.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1198–1212.Google Scholar
Girme, Y. U., Molloy, P. R., & Overall, N. C. (2016). Repairing distance and facilitating support: Reassurance seeking by highly avoidant individuals is associated with greater closeness and partner support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 645–661.Google Scholar
Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2015). “All or nothing”: Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 450–475.Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. M., & Chen, S. (2013). Does power help or hurt? The moderating role of self-other focus on power and perspective taking in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1097–1110.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197.Google Scholar
Gouin, J. P., Glaser, R., Loving, T. J., Malarkey, W. B., Sotwell, J., Houts, C., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2009). Attachment-related avoidance predicts inflammatory responses to marital conflict. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 23, 898–904.Google Scholar
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Attachment-style differences in the experiences and expression of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 5, 273–291.Google Scholar
Heavey, C. L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 797–801.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H. et al. (eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. FreemanGoogle Scholar
Impett, E. A., & Gordon, A. M. (2010). Why do people sacrifice to approach rewards versus to avoid costs? Insights from attachment theory. Personal Relationships, 17, 299–315.Google Scholar
Jayamaha, S. D., Antonellis, C., & Overall, N. C. (2016). Attachment insecurity and inducing guilt to regulate romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 23, 311–338.Google Scholar
Jayamaha, S. D., Girme, Y. U., & Overall, N. C. (2017). When attachment anxiety impedes support provision: Feeling undervalued when partners are distressed. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 181–191.Google Scholar
Katz, J., & Beach, S. R. (1997). Romance in the crossfire: When do women's depressive symptoms predict partner relationship dissatisfaction? Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 16, 243–258.Google Scholar
Kaura, S. A., & Allen, C. M. (2004). Dissatisfaction with relationship power and dating violence perpetration by men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 576–588.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H.T., Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Kifer, Y., Heller, D., Perunovic, W. Q. E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). The good life of the powerful: The experience of power and authenticity enhances subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 24, 280–288.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502.Google Scholar
Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., Fleming, W. S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 64, 231–245.Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. M., Chen, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2015). Having a thicker skin: Social power buffers the negative effects of social rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 701–709.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R., Twenge, J. M., Quinlivan, E. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 111–132.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., & Cannon, K. T. (2012). Dysphoric reassurance seeking breeds contempt: Experimental evidence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 1023–1050.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., & Dobush, S. (2015). When do personality and emotion predict destructive behavior during relationship conflict? The role of perceived commitment asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 83, 523–534.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., Jr., & Dudley, K. L. (2011). Caution: Fragile! Regulating the interpersonal security of chronically insecure partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 681–702.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P. Jr., Overall, N. C., & Clark, M. S. (2012). Experiences and interpersonal consequences of hurt feelings and anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 982–1006.Google Scholar
Little, K. C., McNulty, J. K., & Russell, M. (2010). Sex buffers intimates against the negative implications of attachment insecurity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 484–498.Google Scholar
Lowyck, B., Luyten, P., Demyttenaere, K., & Corveleyn, J. (2008). The role of romantic attachment and self-criticism and dependency for the relationship satisfaction of community adults. Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 78–95.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. (1998a). Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 513–524.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M. (1998b). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209–1224.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1997). Are emotional and instrumental supportive interactions beneficial in times of stress? The impact of attachment style. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 109–127.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 321.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Attachment theory expanded: A behavioral systems approach. In Deauz, K. & Snyder, M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 467–520). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, B., & Bates, G. W. (1997). Adult attachment style and vulnerability to depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 835–844.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116, 908–928.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Aloni, M., Holmes, J.G., Derrick, J. L., Anthony, Stinson D., & Leder, S. (2009). Fostering partner dependence as trust insurance: The implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 324–348.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Bellavia, G. M., Rose, P., & Griffin, D. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459.Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.Google Scholar
Oriña, M. M., Collins, W. A., Simpson, J. A., Salvatore, J. E., Haydon, K. C., & Kim, J. S. (2011). Developmental and dyadic perspectives on commitment in adult romantic relationships. Psychological Science, 22, 908–915.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2015). Attachment and dyadic regulation processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 61–66.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Filo, J. (2015). Attachment avoidance, biased perceptions of negative emotions, and behavioral hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 730–749.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: the costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Girme, Y. U., Lemay, E. P. Jr., & Hammond, M. T. (2014). Attachment anxiety and reactions to relationship threat: The benefits and costs of inducing guilt in romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 235–256.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). Power in context: Relationship and situational power interact to predict men's aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Attachment and dependence regulation within daily interactions with romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 16, 239–261.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Sibley, C. G., & Tan, R. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271–290.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Simpson, J. A., & Struthers, H. (2013). Buffering attachment avoidance: Softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 854–871.Google Scholar
Peplau, A. L., & Campbell, S. M. (1989). The balance of power in dating and marriage. In Freeman, J. (ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Feldman Barret, L. F. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409–1423.Google Scholar
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Grich, J. (2001). Adult attachment and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 421.Google Scholar
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., & Oriña, M. M. (1999). Attachment and anger in an anxiety-provoking situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 940–957.Google Scholar
Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., Van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial vs. proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779–790.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. S., Bidwell, J., & Wilson, L. (2005). Perception of and satisfaction with relationship power, sex, and attachment styles: A couple level analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 241–251.Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A. (2007). The Adult Attachment Interview and self-reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 678–697.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., and Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 70–78.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–75.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar
Sagrestano, L. M., Heavey, C. L., & Christensen, A. (1999). Perceived power and physical violence in marital conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 65–79.Google Scholar
Salvatore, J. E., Kuo, S. I., Steele, R. D., Simpson, J. A., & Collins, W. A. (2011). Recovering from conflict in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. Psychological Science, 22, 376–383.Google Scholar
Shallcross, S. L., Howland, M., Bemis, J., Simpson, J. A., & Frazier, P. (2011). Not “capitalizing” on social capitalization interactions: The role of attachment insecurity. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 77–85.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Adult attachment strategies and the regulation of emotion. In Gross, J. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 446–465). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., Segev, M. A., & Mikulincer, M. A. (2011). A behavioral systems perspective on power and aggression. In Shaver, P. R. & Mikulincer, M. (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 343–359.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Power and social influence in relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), The handbook of personality and social psychology: Interpersonal relations and group processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious–ambivalent dating partners to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Overall, N. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 54–59.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In Devine, T. & Plante, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 45, pp. 279–328). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Nelligan, J. S. (1992). Support-seeking and support-giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M. M., & Grich, J. (2002). Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598–608.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Winterheld, H. A., Rholes, S., & Oriña, M. (2007). Working models of attachment and reactions to different forms of caregiving from romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 466–477.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Schmeeckle, M., & Felmlee, D. (2006). The principle of least interest: Inequality in emotional involvement in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1255–1280.Google Scholar
Tan, R., Overall, N. C., & Taylor, J. K. (2012). Let's talk about us: Attachment, relationship-focused disclosure, and relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 19, 521–534.Google Scholar
Tidwell, M. C. O., Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1996). Attachment, attractiveness, and social interaction: A diary study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 729–745.Google Scholar
Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Pro-relationship maintenance behavior: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 685–698.Google Scholar
Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2011). Attachment, commitment and relationship maintenance: When partners really matter. In Campbell, L., La Guardia, J., Olson, J., & Zanna, M. (Eds.), The science of the couple: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 10). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waller, W. W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family, a dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, M. P. (2013). Centrality of control-seeking in men's intimate partner violence perpetration. Prevention Science, 14, 513–523.Google Scholar
References
Agnew, C. R. (1999). Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: Who decides what a couple does? In Severy, L. J. & Miller, W. B. (Eds.), Advances in population: psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 3, pp. 163–188). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B. (2002). Joking violence among highly committed individuals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 591–610.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., & Capezza, N. M. (2011). The paradox of partner aggression: Being committed to an aggressive partner. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), Understanding and reducing aggression and their consequences (pp. 367–383). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Capezza, N. M., & Daly, C. A. (2016). Personal standards for judging aggression by a relationship partner: How much aggression is too much? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 36–54.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Capezza, N. M., Goodfriend, W., & Allsop, K. A. (2018). The invisible harm of downplaying a romantic partner's aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 275–280.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Capezza, N. M., Goodfriend, W., Rayl, E. S., & Sands, K. J. (2013). Individual well-being and relationship maintenance at odds: The unexpected perils of maintaining a relationship with an aggressive partner. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 676–684.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., Cobb, R. J., & Daly, C. A. (2018). Aggression and violence in romantic relationships. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arriaga, X. B., & Schkeryantz, E. L. (2015). Intimate relationships and personal distress: The invisible harm of psychological aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1332–1344.Google Scholar
Bradbury, T. N., & Lawrence, E. (1999). Physical aggression and the longitudinal course of newlywed marriage. In Arriaga, X. B., & Oskamp, S. (Eds.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 181–202). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Verette, J. (1999). Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Personal Relationships, 6, 389–409.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In Turner, M. R. R. H. (Ed.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 30–65). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & Van Dellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673.Google Scholar
Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–217.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (2002). Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. Personal Relationships, 9, 1–26.Google Scholar
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000–1019.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H. et al. Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ioerger, M. (2015). Permitting joint-control in asymmetric dependence relationships: Investigating a strategy for increasing trust. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from Dissertations - ALL. 366. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/366.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20–67). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners: From the scars of survival to the wisdom for change. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., Rink, F., Galinsky, A. D. (2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498–512.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783.Google Scholar
Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar
Sheeran, P., Abraham, C., & Orbell, S. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 90–132.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Orina, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236–250.Google Scholar
Taft, C. T., O'Farrell, T. J., Torres, S. E., Panuzio, J., Monson, C. M., Murphy, M., & Murphy, C. M. (2006). Examining the correlates of psychological aggression among a community sample of couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 581–588.Google Scholar
Tan, K., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2018). Running on empty: Measuring psychological dependence in close relationships lacking satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 977–998.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Klapwijk, A. (2007). Prisoner's dilemma. In Baumeister, R. F. & Vohs, K. D. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 701–704). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., & Agnew, C. R. (2014). Relational consequences of personal goal pursuits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 927–940.Google Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., Harvey, S. M., & Warren, J. (2013). Whose intentions predict? Power over condom use within heterosexual dyads. Health Psychology, 32, 1038–1046.Google Scholar
Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. Fort Worth: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.Google Scholar
Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Arriaga, X. B. (2008). Relational ostracism. In Forgas, J. P. & Fitness, J. (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective and motivational processes (pp. 305–319). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
References
Bingenheimer, J. B., & Geronimus, A. T. (2009). Behavioral mechanisms in HIV epidemiology and prevention: Past, present, and future roles. Studies in Family Planning, 40, 187–204.Google Scholar
Chae, D. H., & Yoshikawa, H. (2008). Perceived group devaluation, depression, and HIV-risk behavior among Asian gay men. Health Psychology, 27, 140–148.Google Scholar
Coates, T. J., Richter, L., & Caceres, C. (2008). Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: How to make them work better. The Lancet, 372, 669–684.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. (2013). Gender, relationship power, and HIV testing in rural Malawi (PhD Dissertation). University of Colorado Denver, Department of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Denver.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. A. (2014a). Gender, power, and intimate partner violence: A study on couples from rural Malawi. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 866–888.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. A. (2014b). ‘It means there is doubt in the house’: Perceptions and experiences of HIV testing in rural Malawi. Culture Health & Sexuality, 16, 397–411.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. A. (2014c). Marital infidelity and intimate partner violence in rural Malawi: A dyadic investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1303–1314.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. A., & Chilungo, A. (2014). Male victims of sexual violence in rural Malawi: The overlooked association with HIV infection. AIDS Care, 26, 1576–1580.Google Scholar
Conroy, A., Comfort, M., Darbes, L.A., Johnson, M. O., Van Oosterhout, J. J. G., & Mkandawire, J. (2017, 13–15 November). Exploring linkages between couple functioning and adherence to ART in Malawi: A dyadic perspective. Oral presentation given at the AIDS Impact 13th International Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
DiClemente, R. J., Salazar, L. F., & Crosby, R. A. (2007). A review of STD/HIV preventive interventions for adolescents: Sustaining effects using an ecological approach. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 888.Google Scholar
Do, T. D., Chen, S., McFarland, W., Secura, G. M., Behel, S. K., MacKellar, D. A., … Cho, K. H. (2005). HIV testing patterns and unrecognized HIV infection among young Asian/Pacific Islander men who have sex with men in San Francisco. AIDS Education & Prevention, 17, 540–554.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Berdahl, J. (2007). Social power. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 678–692.Google Scholar
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Gupta, G. R., Parkhurst, J. O., Ogden, J. A., Aggleton, P., & Mahal, A. (2008). Structural approaches to HIV prevention. The Lancet, 372, 764–775.Google Scholar
Han, C. (2008). A qualitative exploration of the relationship between racism and unsafe sex among Asian/Pacific Islander gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 827–837.Google Scholar
Hannon, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kamashiro, M. (2010). In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayal. Personal Relationships, 17, 253–278.Google Scholar
Holtgrave, D., & Crosby, R. (2003). Social capital, poverty, and income inequality as predictors of gonorrhoea, syphilis, chlamydia and AIDS case rates in the United States. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 79, 62–64.Google Scholar
Jewkes, R. K., Dunkle, K., Nduna, M., & Shai, N. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: A cohort study. The Lancet, 376, 41–48.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, N. (1994). Epidemiology and the web of causation: Has anyone seen the spider? Social Science & Medicine, 39, 887–903.Google Scholar
Latkin, C. A., & Knowlton, A. R. (2005). Micro-social structural approaches to HIV prevention: A social ecological perspective. AIDS Care, 17, 102–113.Google Scholar
Malawi Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability and Social Welfare. (2014). National Plan of Action to Combat Gender-Based Violence in Malawi (2014–2020). Lilongwe, Malawi: Government of Malawi.Google Scholar
Peters, P. E. (1997). Against the odds: matriliny, land and gender in the shire highlands of Malawi. Critique of Anthropology, 17, 189–210.Google Scholar
Operario, D., Choi, K. H., Chu, P. L., McFarland, W., Secura, G. M., Behel, S., … Valleroy, L. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of substance use among young Asian/Pacific Islander men who have sex with men. Prevention Science, 7, 19–29.Google Scholar
Operario, D., Han, C., & Choi, K. H. (2008). Dual identity among gay Asian/Pacific Islander men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 10, 447–461.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J. Y., & Pitpitan, E. (2010). Power basis theory: A psycho-ecological approach to power. In Dunning, D. (Ed.), Social motivation. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., & Pitpitan, E. V. (2008). Ethnocentrism and sexism: How stereotypes legitimize six types of power. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 2159–2176.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Schatz, E. (2005). ‘Take your mat and go’! Rural Malawian women's strategies in the HIV/AIDS era. Culture Health & Sexuality, 7, 479–492.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sumartojo, E. (2000). Structural factors in HIV prevention: Concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS, 14, S3.Google Scholar
Tan, J. Y., Campbell, C. K., Tabrisky, A. P., Siedle-Khan, R., & Conroy, A. A. (2018). A conceptual model of dyadic coordination in HIV care engagement among couples of black men who have sex with men: A qualitative dyadic analysis. AIDS and Behavior, 22, 2584–2592.Google Scholar
Tan, J. Y., Baig, A. A., & Chin, M. H. (2017). High stakes for the health of sexual and gender minority patients of color. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32, 1390–1395.Google Scholar
Tan, J. Y., Pratto, F., Paul, J., & Choi, K. H. (2014). A social-ecological perspective on power and HIV/AIDS with a sample of men who have sex with men of colour. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 16, 202–215.Google Scholar
Tan, J. Y., Earnshaw, V. A., Pratto, F., Rosenthal, L., & Kalichman, S. (2015). Social-structural indices and between-nation differences in HIV prevalence. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 26, 48–54.Google Scholar
Trickett, E. J. (2002). Context, culture, and collaboration in AIDS interventions: Ecological ideas for enhancing community impact. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 23, 157–174.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2015). World development indicators. Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org.ucsf.idm.oclc.org/country/malawiGoogle Scholar
Yoshikawa, H., Wilson, P., Chae, D. H., & Cheng, J. F. (2004). Do family and friendship networks protect against the influence of discrimination on mental health and HIV risk among Asian and Pacific Islander gay men? AIDS Education and Prevention, 16, 84–100.Google Scholar
References
Akinola, M., & Mendes, W. B. (2014). It's good to be king: Neurological benefits of higher social standing. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 43–51.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Langner, C., & Keltner, D. (2001). Status, power, and emotion. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brick, D. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand compatibility, relationship power, and life satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 44, 991–1014.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587–599.Google Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.Google Scholar
Cornelius, T., Desrosiers, A., & Kershaw, T. (2016). Spread of health behaviors in young couples: How relationship power shapes relational influence. Social Science and Medicine, 165, 46–55.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K., & Simpson, J. A. (2017). Effects of relationship functioning on the biological experience of stress and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 49–53.Google Scholar
Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The Relationship Power Inventory (RPI): Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22, 387–413.Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 model: Metatheory, theory, and evidence. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1–104.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
Galliher, R. V., Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (1999). Power and psychological well-being in late adolescent romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 40, 689–710.Google Scholar
Huelsnitz, C. O., Rothman, A. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2018). How do individuals influence their partner's health behavior? Insights from a dyadic perspective. In Maddux, J. E. (Ed.), Social psychological foundations of well-being (pp. 75–102). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T.L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Karremans, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010–1023.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Malarkey, W. B., Chee, M., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., Mao, H. Y., & Glaser, R. (1993). Negative behavior during marital conflict is associated with immunological down-regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 395–409.Google Scholar
Kogan, S. M., Simons, L. G., Chen, Y. F., Burwell, S., & Brody, G. H. (2013). Protective parenting, relationship power equity, and condom use among rural African American emerging adult women. Family Relations, 62, 341–353.Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. M., Chen, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2015). Having a thicker skin: Social power buffers the negative effects of social rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 701–709.Google Scholar
Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., Carswell, K. L., van Dellen, M. R., Hofmann, W., … Brown, P. C. (2016). Power and the pursuit of a partner's goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 840–868.Google Scholar
Lilleston, P. S., Hebert, L. E., Jennings, J. M., Holtgrave, D. R., Ellen, J. M., & Sherman, S. G. (2015). Attitudes towards power in relationships and sexual concurrency within heterosexual youth partnerships in Baltimore, MD. AIDS and Behavior, 19, 2280–2290.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. E., Dopp, J. M., Myers, H. F., Stevens, S. Y., & Fahey, J. L. (1999). Psychosocial predictors of natural killer cell mobilization during marital conflict. Health Psychology, 18, 262–271.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620–639.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.Google Scholar
Peters, B. J., Hammond, M. D., Reis, H. T., & Jamieson, J. P. (2016). The consequences of having a dominant romantic partner on testosterone responses during a social interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 74, 308–315.Google Scholar
Righetti, F., Luchies, L. B., van Gils, S., Slotter, E. B., Witcher, B., & Kumashiro, M. (2015). The prosocial versus proself power holder: How power influences sacrifice in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 779–790.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C.E., & Van Lange, P. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2016). Representation and incorporation of close others’ responses: The RICOR model of social influence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 311–331.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual relationships over time from “his” to “her” perspectives, Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C. R., Harvey, S. M., & Warren, J. T. (2013). Whose intentions predict? Power over condom use within heterosexual dyads. Health Psychology, 32, 1038–1046.Google Scholar
Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. (2016). Complaint avoidance and complaint-related appraisals in close relationships: A dyadic power theory perspective. Communication Research, 43, 391–413.Google Scholar
Yovetich, N. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.Google Scholar
References
Adams, G., Anderson, S. L., & Adonu, J. K. (2004). The cultural grounding of closeness and intimacy. In Mashek, D. & Aron, A. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 321–339). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R. (1999). Power over interdependent behavior within the dyad: Who decides what a couple does? In Severy, L. J. & Miller, W. (Eds.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 3, pp. 163–188). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., & South, S. C. (Eds.) (2014). Interpersonal relationships and health: social and clinical psychological mechanisms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the cognitive representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.Google Scholar
Allgood, S. M., Harris, S., Skogrand, L., & Lee, T. R. (2009). Marital commitment and religiosity in a religiously homogenous population. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 52–67.Google Scholar
Amadiume, I. (2002). Bodies, choices, globalizing neocolonial enchantments: African matriarchs and mammy water. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 2, 41–66.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., & Galinksy, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.Google Scholar
Applbaum, K. D. (1995). Marriage with the proper stranger: Arranged marriage in metropolitan Japan. Ethnology, 34, 37–51.Google Scholar
Baker, E. H., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2009). Covenant marriage and the sanctification of gendered marital roles. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 137–178.Google Scholar
Baker, R., Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (1996). Time, dirt, and money: The effects of gender, gender ideology, and type of earner marriage on time, house-hold task, and economic satisfaction among couples with children. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 161–177.Google Scholar
Banks, R. R. (2011). Is marriage for white people? How the African American marriage decline affects everyone. New York: Dutton/Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Barone, R. P., Wolgemuth, J. R., & Linder, C. (2007). Preventing sexual assault through engaging college men. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 585–594.Google Scholar
Barrett, A. E. (2000). Marital trajectories and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 451–64.Google Scholar
Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1617–1627.Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bond, M. H. (2007). Culture and collective violence: How good people, usually men, do bad things. In Drozdek, B. & Wilson, J. P. (Eds.), Voices of trauma: Treating survivors across cultures (pp. 27–57). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2008). Untapped potential in the study of negotiation and gender inequality in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 99–132.Google Scholar
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Butler, J. P. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T., & Lee, T. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765–778.Google Scholar
Cherlin, A. (1992). Marriage, cohabitation, sexual behavior, and childbearing in North America. In The peopling of the Americas (Vol. 3, pp. 223–243). Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
Choi, S. Y. P., & Ting, K. (2008). Wife beating in South Africa: An imbalance theory of resources and power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 834–852.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1991). The meaning of motherhood in Black culture and Black mother–daughter relationships. In Bell-Scott, P., Guy-Sheftall, P. B., Royster, J. J., Sims-Wood, J., Decosta-Willis, M., & Fultz, L. (Eds.), Double stitch: Black women write about mothers and daughters (pp. 42–60). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Cook, K. S., & Gillmore, M. R. (1984). Power, dependence, and coalitions. In Lawler, E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 1, pp. 27–58). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2000). Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. Recent Developments in Urban and Regional Economics 182, 263–291.Google Scholar
Cox, C. L., Wexler, M. O., Rusbult, C. E., & Gaines, S. O. Jr. (1997). Prescriptive support and commitment processes in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 79–90.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (2004). Mars and Venus collide: A discursive analysis of marital self-help psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 14, 63–79.Google Scholar
Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men's engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 343–370.Google Scholar
Davis, L. E., Williams, J. H., Emerson, S., & Hourd-Bryant, M. (2000). Factors contributing to partner commitment among unmarried African Americans. Social Work Research, 24, 4–15.Google Scholar
Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1996). Singlehood, marriage and remarriage: The effects of family structure and family relationships on mothers’ well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 388–407.Google Scholar
DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and still live happily ever after. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Dohm, A., & Wyatt, I. (2002). College at work: Outlook and earnings for college graduates, 2000-10. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 46, 3–15.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E. (2000). Explication and initial test of dyadic power theory. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 61, 2993–3126.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E. (2004). Dyadic power theory: Constructing a communication-based theory of relational power. Journal of Family Communication, 4, 235–248.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., & Loretto, W. (2004). Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 11, 95–115.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). The analysis of sex differences in social behavior: A new theory and a new method. In Eagly, A. H. (Ed.), Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation (pp. 7–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of human sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.Google Scholar
Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47, 112–133.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. E., & Moskoff, W. (1983). Decision-making power in Romanian families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14, 39–50.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. (Ed.). (2001). Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Molm, L. D. (2010). Bridging inequality from both sides now. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 341–346.Google Scholar
Flanagan, J. (2009, April 25). Numbers gap and a crazy sex ratio in Beijing. Retrieved from http://www.healthintelasia.com/numbers-gap-and-a-crazy-sex-ratio-in-beijing/Google Scholar
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Fu, X. (2008). Interracial marriage and family socio-economic well-being: Equal status exchange or caste status exchange? The Social Science Journal, 45, 132–155.Google Scholar
Furnée, C. A., Groot, W., & Pfann, G. A. (2011). Health and income: A meta-analysis to explore cross-country, gender, and age differences. European Journal of Public Health, 21, 775–780.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.Google Scholar
Ganguly-Scrase, R. (2003). Paradoxes of globalization, liberalization, and gender equality: The worldviews of the lower middle class in West Bengal, India. Gender & Society, 17, 544–566.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1968). Power in the recent writings of Talcott Parsons. Sociology, 2, 257–272.Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.Google Scholar
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.Google Scholar
Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2009). Hierarchical rank and women's organizational mobility: Glass ceilings in corporate law firms. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1428–74.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (2000). Gender, power, and difference: Reconfiguring law from Bakwena women's perspectives. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 23, 89–106.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 69–80.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. A. J. (1997). Civil rights versus sovereignty: Native American women in life and land struggles. In Alexander, M. J. & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.), Feminist Genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures (pp. 101–121). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.Google Scholar
Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Halpern, C. T., Young, M. L., Waller, M. W., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2004). Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 124–131.Google Scholar
Harman, J. J., & Biringen, Z. (2016). Parents acting badly: How institutions and societies promote the alienation of children from their loving families. Fort Collins: Colorado Parental Alienation Project, LLC.Google Scholar
Harman, J. J., Kaufman, M. R., Aoki, E., & Trott, C. D. (2014). Sexual network partners in Tanzania: Labels, power, and the systemic muting of women's health and identity. In Pishwa, H. & Schulze, R. (Eds.), Expression of inequality in interaction: Power, dominance, and status, pp. 49–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Harman, J. J., Smith, V. E., & Egan, L. C. (2007). The impact of incarceration on intimate relationships. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 794–815.Google Scholar
Harry, J., & DeVall, W. B. (1978). The social organization of gay males. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. M., Beckman, L. J., & Bird, S. T. (2003). Feeling powerful in heterosexual relationships: Cultural beliefs among couples of Mexican origin. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 5, 321–337.Google Scholar
Hill, A. K., Hunt, J., Welling, L. L. M., Cárdenas, R. A., Rotella, M. A., Wheatley, J. R., … Puts, D. A. (2013). Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 334–341.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting “patriarchy” as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15, 553–573.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christenses, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Paplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71–85.Google Scholar
ILO Socio-Economic Security Programme. (n.d.). Fact sheet no. 4: Women face more economic insecurity: Cumulative disadvantages intensify gender divide. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/ses/download/docs/sheet_no4.pdf.Google Scholar
Izraeli, D. N. (1983). Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter's theory of proportions. Social Forces, 62, 153–165.Google Scholar
Jemmott, J. B., Ashby, K. L., & Lindenfeld, K. (1989). Romantic commitment and the perceived availability of opposite-sex persons: On loving the one you're with. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1198–1211.Google Scholar
Kalmijn, M. (2005). The effects of divorce on men's unemployment and social security histories. European Journal of Population, 21, 347–366.Google Scholar
Kang, X. (2006). The cult of the fox: Power, gender, and religion in late imperial and modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Karakurt, G., & Cumbie, T. (2012). The relationship between egalitarianism, dominance, and violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 115–122.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978) Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
Ketchen, B., Armistead, L., & Cook, S. (2009). HIV infection, stressful life events, and intimate relationship power: The moderating role of community resources for Black South African women. Women & Health, 49, 197–214.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.Google Scholar
Kim, J. S., Griskevicius, V., & Simpson, J. (2011, January). Sex ratio and relationship maintenance: An experimental approach. Address presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Kjøs, P., Tjersland, O. A., & Roen, K. (2014). The mediation window: Regulation of argumentation and affect in custody mediation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55, 527–538.Google Scholar
Klawitter, M. (2008). The effects of sexual orientation and marital status on how couples hold their money. Review of Economics of the Household, 6, 423–446.Google Scholar
Klunklin, A., & Greenwood, J. (2005). Buddhism, the status of women, and the spread of HIV/AIDS in Thailand. Health Care for Women International, 26, 46–61.Google Scholar
Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113.Google Scholar
Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2009). Shared or separate: Money management and changing norms of gender equality among Norwegian couples. Community, Work & Family, 12, 39–55.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Processes, 52, 5–18.Google Scholar
Knudson-Martin, C., & Mahoney, A. R. (2009). Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kotla, H. (2011, April). India's skewed sex ratio: Seven brothers. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/18530371Google Scholar
Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., Fitzgerald, C. J., & Peterson, T. (2010). Female scarcity reduces women's marital ages and increases variance in men's marital ages. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 420–431.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., & Schlemmer, E. (2009). Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 280–287.Google Scholar
Kubicek, K., McNeeley, M., & Collins, S. (2015). Same-sex relationship in a straight world: Individual and societal influences on power and control in young men's relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 83–109.Google Scholar
Lachance-Grzela, M., & Bouchard, G. (2010). Why do women do the lion's share of the housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles, 63, 767–780.Google Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships 10, 37–57.Google Scholar
Lee, K. (2001). China's growing problem of too many men. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/china/2011/05/13/chinas-growing-problem-of-too-many-single-men/.Google Scholar
Lee, I., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064.Google Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J. (2010). Differences in relationship investments between gay and heterosexual men. Personal Relationships, 17, 81–96.Google Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Commitment in age-gap heterosexual romantic relationships: A test of evolutionary and socio-cultural predictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 74–82.Google Scholar
Lehmiller, J. J., VanderDrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 275–284.Google Scholar
Lennon, C. A., Stewart, A. L., & Ledermann, T. (2012). The role of power in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 95–114.Google Scholar
Little, B., & Terrance, C. (2010). Perceptions of domestic violence in lesbian relationships: Stereotypes and gender role expectations. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 429–440.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. B. (1991). A perspective on Darwinian psychology: The importance of domain-general mechanisms, plasticity, and individual differences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 449–480.Google Scholar
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186.Google Scholar
Marks, N. F., & Lambert, J. D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults: Longitudinal effects on psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 652–686.Google Scholar
Medicine, B. (2001). Learning to be an anthropologist & remaining “native”. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Meier, K., Kirchler, E., & Hubert, A. (1999). Savings and investment decisions within private households: Spouses’ dominance in decisions on various forms of investment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 99–519.Google Scholar
Mikula, G. (1998). Justice in the family – multiple perspectives in the division of labor: Introduction. Social Justice Research, 11, 211–213.Google Scholar
Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, D. S. (2010). Quarrelsomeness in daily life. Journal of Personality, 78, 39–66.Google Scholar
Müller, U. (1998). The micropolitics of gender differences in family life. In Ferreira, V., Tavares, T., & Portugal, S. (Eds.), Shifting bonds, shifting bounds (pp. 329–344). Oeiras: Celta Editora.Google Scholar
Musaiger, A. O., & D'Souza, R. (2009). Role of age and gender in the perception of aging: A community-based survey in Kuwait. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48, 50–57.Google Scholar
Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 402–412.Google Scholar
National Spiritual Assembly of the Ba’ Hai of the United States (2013). Spiritual concepts. Retrieved from http://www.bahai.us/welcome/spiritual-concepts/Google Scholar
Naved, R. T., & Persson, L. A. (2010). Dowry and spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 830–856.Google Scholar
Netting, N. S. (2010). Marital ideoscapes in 21st-century India: Creative combinations of love and responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 707–726.Google Scholar
North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Sibley, C. G., & Tan, R. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271–290.Google Scholar
Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195–217.Google Scholar
Oyamot, C. M., Fuglestad, P. T., & Snyder, M. (2010). Balance of power and influence in relationships: The role of self-monitoring. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 23–46.Google Scholar
Papp, L. M. (2010). The course and quality of intimate relationships among psychologically distressed mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80, 71–79.Google Scholar
Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271–291.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In Freeman, J. (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., pp. 106–121). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
Poeschl, G. (2008). Social norms and feelings of justice about unequal family practices. Social Justice Research, 21, 69–85.Google Scholar
Poortman, A. (2000). Sex differences in the economic consequences of separation: A panel study of the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 16, 1–17.Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau. (2005). Marriage in the Arab world. Retrieved from http://www.igwg.org/pdf05/MarriageInArabWorld_Eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Potoczniak, M. J., Murot, J. E., Crosbie-Burnett, M., & Potoczniak, D. J. (2003). Legal and psychological perspectives on same-sex domestic violence: A multisystemic approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 252–259.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Lee, I., Tan, J. Y., & Pitpitan, E. V. (2011). Power basis theory: A psychoecological approach to power. In Dunning, D. (Ed.), Social motivation (pp. 191–222). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In Eagly, A. H., Beall, A., & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 242–268). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Prior, M. (2001). Matrifocality, power, and gender relations in Jamaica. In Brettell, C. B. & Sargent, C. F. (Eds.), Gender in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 371–379). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Qian, Z. (1997). Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34, 263–276.Google Scholar
Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63, 283–327.Google Scholar
Raja, V. (2010). Intimacy, time, and scarcity: Drug-involved women account for secretly withholding financial capital in violent intimate relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 131–158.Google Scholar
Raven, B. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 7, 217–244.Google Scholar
Raven, B. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 1–22.Google Scholar
Rich, A. (1976). Of women born: Motherhood experience and institution. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. (1993). Women, motherhood, and childrearing. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, J. J., & Josephs, R. A. (2010). Dominance and health: The role of social rank in physiology and illness. In Guinote, A. & Vescio, T. K. (Eds.), The social psychology of power (pp. 87–112). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers-Rose, L. (1980). The Black woman: A historical overview. In Rodgers-Rose, L. (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 15–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 619–627.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. J. (2005). A critique of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1284–1325.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. D., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., & Conley, T. (2014). On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal für Psychologie, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., Fetterolf, J. C., & Sanchez, D. T. (2013). What motivates the sexual double standard? More support for male versus female control theory. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 250–263.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.Google Scholar
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the Investment Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Martz, J. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence Processes. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564–596). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–375.Google Scholar
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.Google Scholar
Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.Google Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Orina, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Power and social influence in relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.) APA handbook of personality and social psychology: vol. 2. interpersonal relations and group processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspective. Sex Roles, 37, 361–379.Google Scholar
StatsBee, (2012). Ratio of single men to single women. Retrieved from http://nycedc.tumblr.com/post/16175652438/ratio-of-single-men-to-single-women-in-nyc-newGoogle Scholar
Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251–289). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stets, J. E. (1997). Status and identity in marital interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 185–217.Google Scholar
Strube, M. J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236–250.Google Scholar
Sutphin, S. T. (2010). Social exchange theory and the division of household labor in same sex couples. Marriage & Family Review, 46, 191–206.Google Scholar
The World Bank. (2008). Girls’ education in the 21st Century: Equality, empowerment, and growth. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1099080014368/DID_Girls_edu.pdf.Google Scholar
Thege, B. (2009). Rural Black women's agency within intimate partnerships amid the South African HIV epidemic. African Journal of AIDS Research, 8, 455–464.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
Thitsa, K. (1983). Nuns, mediums and prostitutes in Chiang Mai: A study of some marginal categories of women. Occasional Paper No. 1. Kent, UK: University of Kent at Canterbury, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 638–650.Google Scholar
Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men's dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205.Google Scholar
Uecker, J. E., & Regnerus, M. D. (2010). Bare market: Campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. The Sociological Quarterly, 51, 408–435.Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. (2011). More working women than men have college degrees, Census Bureau Reports. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html.Google Scholar
Uunk, W. J. G. (2004). The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: The impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population, 20, 251–285.Google Scholar
Van Willigen, M., & Drentea, P. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44, 571–597.Google Scholar
Vogler, C. (1998). Money in the household: Some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review, 46, 687–713.Google Scholar
Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Wong, D. (2012). Doing gender, doing culture: Division of domestic labour among lesbians in Hong Kong. Women's Studies International Forum, 35, 266–275.Google Scholar
Worell, J. (1988). Women's satisfaction in close relationships. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 477–498.Google Scholar
Whyte, M. K. (1978). The status of women in preindustrial societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yan, Y. (2006). Girl power: Young women and the waning of patriarchy in rural North China. Ethnology, 45, 105–123.Google Scholar
Yusof, A., & Duasa, J. (2010). Household decision-making and expenditure patterns of married men and women in Malaysia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31, 371–381.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. (2009). Fecundity and husband-wife education gaps at first marriage (Doctoral dissertation, Binghamton University). Retrieved from http://udini.proquest.com/view/fecundity-and-husband-wife-age-and-pqid:1917842381/Google Scholar
Zhou, L. (2006). American and Chinese college student's anticipation of their postgraduate education, career, and future family roles. Sex Roles, 55, 95–110.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Dong, X. L., Wang, L., & Li, T. H. (2011). The very high sex ratio in rural China: Impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of unmarried men. Social Science & Medicine 73, 1422–1427.Google Scholar
Zipp, J. F., & Toth, J. (2002). She said, he said, they said: The impact of spousal presence in survey research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 177–208.Google Scholar
Zipp, J. F., Prohaska, A., & Bemiller, M. (2004). Wives, husbands, and hidden power in marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 933–958.Google Scholar