Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T06:06:14.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Gary Goertz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Amy G. Mazur
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Politics, Gender, and Concepts
Theory and Methodology
, pp. 271 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadan-Unat, Nermin, and Tokgöz, Oya. 1994. “Turkish women as agents of social change in a pluralist democracy.” In Nelson, and Chowdhury, , Women and Politics Worldwide, pp. 705–20.
Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: a theory of gendered organizations.” Gender & Society 4, pp. 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, Joan. 1992. “Gendered institutions: from sex roles to gendered institutions.” Contemporary Society 21, pp. 565–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke A., Stern, Maria, and True, Jacqui (eds.). 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Adcock, R. 1998. “What is a ‘concept’”? Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meetings.
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. “Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research.” American Political Science Review 95/3 (September), pp. 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodore, Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, R. Nevitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. 1991–2. “The problem of speaking for others,” Cultural Critique (Winter), pp. 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying political regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31, pp. 2–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E. 1998. “Latin American feminisms ‘go global’: trends of the 1990s and challenges for the new millennium.” In Alvarez, Sonia E., Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo (eds.), Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 293–324.Google Scholar
Annesley, Claire. 2003. “Transforming welfare and gender regimes: evidence from the UK and Germany”. Comparative European Politics 1/2, pp. 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, Douglas. 1986. The Emergence of Welfare States. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
,Association for Women's Rights in Development (AWID.) 2004. “Intersectionality: a tool for gender and economic justice.” Women's Rights and Economic Change 9 (August), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Bache, Ian, and Flinders, Matthew. 2004. “Themes and issues in multi-level governance,” in Bache, Ian and Flinders, Matthew (eds.), Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baden, Sally, and Goetz, Anne Marie. 1997. “Who needs [sex] when you can have [gender]? Conflicting discourses on gender at Beijing.” In Staudt, , Women, International Development and Politics, pp. 37–58.
Bagiç, Aida. 2006. “Women's organizing in post-Yugoslav countries.” In Ferree, Myra Marx and Tripp, Aili Mari (eds.), Global Feminism: Transnational Women's Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, pp. 141–65. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 1991. “Coalition politics and the limits of state feminism in Chile.” Women and Politics 22/4, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2006. “Who are movement insiders? The ideological and biographical characteristics of feminist activists inside the state.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meetings, Philadelphia.
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter (eds.). 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–28.
Barnett, Bernice McNair, Brewer, Rose M., and Kuumba, M. Bahati. 1999. “New directions in race, gender and class studies: African-American experiences.” Race, Gender and Class 6, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michelle. 1980. Women's Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Basu, Amrita (ed.). 1995. The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women's Movements in Global Perspectives. Boulder: Westview Press.
Beasley, Chris. 1999. What is Feminism? An Introduction to Feminist Theory. Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “Beyond compare? Women's movements in comparative perspective.” European Journal of Political Research 37, pp. 431–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005a. “The comparative politics of women's movements.” Perspectives on Politics 3/3 (September), pp. 583–96.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005b “A common language of gender?Politics and Gender 1/1, pp. 128–36.Google Scholar
Bedford, Kate. 2008. “Governing intimacy at the World Bank.” In Rai, Shirin M. and Waylen, Georgina (eds.). Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedolla, Lisa Garcia, and Scola, Becki. 2006. “Finding intersection: race, class and gender in the 2003 California recall vote.” Politics & Gender 2, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. 1992. “Liberal democracy and the limits of democratization.” Political Studies 40/5, pp. 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Emma. 2001. Gender and Governance: A Bibliography, (BRIDGE bibliography) Institute for Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Benería, Lourdes. 2003. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics As If All People Mattered. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (ed.). 1996. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bergqvist, Christina. 2005. “Gender equality politics: ideas and strategies.” In Öberg, PerOla and Torsten Svensson (eds.), Power and Institutions in Industrial Relations Regimes. Stockholm: The National Institute for Working Life, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christina, et al. (eds). 1999. Equal Democracies: Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries. Oslo: Scandinavia University Press.
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, R. A. V.. 2003. Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, R. A. V.. 2006. Governance Stories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birch, A. H. 1971. Representation: Key Concepts in Political Science. London: Pall Mall Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, A. H. 1993. “Political representation.” In Birch, A. H. (ed.). The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela, and Thane, Pat (eds.). 1991. Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880–1950s. London: Routledge.
Bodur, Marella, and Franceschet, Susan. 2002. “Movements, states and empowerment.” In Parpart, Rai and Staudt, , Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World, pp. 112–32.
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1980. “Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy.” American Sociological Review 45 (June), pp. 370–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1990. “Political democracy: conceptual and measurement traps.” Studies in Comparative International Development 25, pp. 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1998. “Cross-national indicators of liberal democracy, 1950–1990.” Codebook. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth. A., and Jackman, Robert. 1989. “Democracy, stability and dichotomies.” American Sociological Review 54 (August), pp. 612–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Lennox, Richard. 1991. “Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective.” Psychological Bulletin 110/2, pp. 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., and Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Subjective measures of liberal democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 33, pp. 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchorst, Anette. 1994. “Welfare state regimes, women's interests and the EC.” In Sainsbury, , Gendering Welfare States, pp. 26–44.
Borchorst, Anette, and Siim, Birte. 1987. “Women and the advanced welfare state: a new kind of patriarchal power?” In Sassoon, Anne Showstack (ed.), Women and the State: The Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–57.Google Scholar
Susan, Bordo. 1993. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, Esther. 1970. Woman's Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, Kirk, Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Mahoney, James. 2005. “Measuring political democracy: case expertise, data adequacy, and central America.” Comparative Political Studies 38, pp. 939–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Jonathon, et al. 1993. “A comparative study of child support in fifteen countries.” Journal of European Social Policy 3, pp. 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.). 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bratton, Kathleen. 2002. “The effect of legislative diversity on agenda setting: evidence from six state legislatures.” American Politics Research 30/2, pp. 115–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen. 2005. “Critical mass theory revisited: the behavior and success of token women in state legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1, pp. 97–125.Google Scholar
Braud, Pierre. 1985. “Théories de la représentation: introduction.” In d'Arcy, François (ed.), La représentationParis: Economica, pp. 33–7.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Hamlin, Alan. 1999. “On political representation.” British Journal of Political Science 29/1, pp. 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, Charlotte. 1998. “Gobal environmental politics: putting gender on the agenda?Review of International Studies, 24/1, pp. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Rose. 1999. “Theorizing race, class and gender: the new scholarship of black feminist intellectuals and black women's labor.” Race, Gender and Class 6, pp. 29–47.Google Scholar
BRIDGE (bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice with accessible and diverse gender information). www.bridge.ids.ac.uk
Briggs, Asa. 1961. “The welfare state in historical perspective.” Archives of European Sociology 11, pp. 221–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Janine. 2005. “Globalization, governance and gender: rethinking the agenda for the twenty-first century.” In Amoore, Louise (ed.), Globalizing Resistance. London: Routledge, pp. 244–56.Google Scholar
Brown, Carol. 1981. “Mothers, fathers and children: from private to public patriarchy.” In Sargent, Lydia (ed.), Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Boston: South End Press, pp. 239–67.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1992. “Finding the man in the state.” Feminist Studies 18/1 (Spring), pp. 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Lisa D. 2003. Gender and Governance. New York: Altamira (Rowman & Littlefield).Google Scholar
Bryson, Valerie. 2003. Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, Bueno, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Anna, Diamond, Hanna, and Marsh, Rosalind (eds.). 2000. “Introduction.” In Bull, Anna, Diamond, Hanna, and Marsh, Rosalind (eds.), Feminisms and Women's Movements in Contemporary Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 1–18.
Burger, Thomas. 1987. Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E., and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1994. “Comparative democracy: the economic development thesis.” American Political Science Review 88, pp. 903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Linda. 2001. “Introduction.” In Blackwell, Maylei, Burnham, Linda, and Choi, Jung Hee (eds.), Time to Rise: US Women of Color – Issues and Strategies. A Report to the UN World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, Durban, South Africa, Aug. 28–Sept. 7, 2001. Berkeley: Women of Color Resource Center Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, Jet, and Kersbergen, Kees 1994. “Gender and welfare states: some theoretical reflections.” In Sainsbury, Gendering Welfare States, pp. 8–25.
Bussemaker, Jet, and Kersbergen, Kees 1999. “Contemporary social-capitalist welfare states and gender inequality,” In Sainsbury, Gender and Welfare State Regimes, pp. 15–46.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Limits to Discursive “Sex.”New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cacoullos, Ann R. 1994. “Women confronting party politics.” In Nelson and Chowdhury, Women and Politics Worldwide, pp. 311–25.
Cameron, David. 1978. “The expansion of the public economy.” American Political Science Review 72, pp. 1243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren P., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan. 1984. “Women candidates and support for feminist concerns: the closet feminist syndrome.” Western Political Quarterly 37/2, pp. 307–23.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan. 2001. “Representing women: women state legislators as agents of policy-related change.” In Carroll, Susan (ed.), The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Miki, Caul. 1999. “Women's representation in parliament. The role of political parties.” Party Politics 5/1, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Karen, Celis. 2006. “Substantive representation of women: the representation of women's interests and the impact of descriptive representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979).” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 28/2, pp. 85–114.Google Scholar
Karen, Celis, Childs, Sara, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking women's substantive representation.” Representation: Special Issue on the Substantive Representation of Women 44/2.Google Scholar
,Center for the American Woman and Politics (CAWP). 2000. “Gender Gap in the 2000 elections.” Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. www.cawp.rutgers.edu/Facts/Elections/gg2000.html, accessed October 31, 2007.
,Center for the American Woman and Politics (CAWP) 2004. “Gender gap in the 2004 Presidential race is widespread.” Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University. www.cawp.rutgers.edu/Facts5.html, accessed October 31, 2007.
Patrick, Chabal, and Daloz, Jean Pascal. 2006. Culture Troubles: Politics and the Interpretation of Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Janet Saltzman, and Dworkin, Anthony Gary. 1986. Female Revolt: Women's Movements in World and Historical Perspective. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Chafetz, Janet Saltzman, and Dworkin, Anthony Gary. 1989. “Action and reaction: an integrated, comparative perspective on feminist and antifeminist movements.” In Kohn, Melvin (ed.), Cross-National Research in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise A. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise A. 2006. “Comparing political institutions: revealing the gendered ‘logic of appropriateness.’Politics & Gender 2 (2 June): 223–34.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise A. 2008. “Governing international law through the International Criminal Court: a new site for gender justice?” In Rai, and Waylen, , Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 160–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, H. 2005. “Not waving but drowning: gender mainstreaming and human rights in the United Nations.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 18 (Spring), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2001. “In their own words: New Labour women and the substantive representation of women.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3/2, pp. 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2005. The Substantive Representation of Women: Rethinking the Critical Mass Debate. Paper presented at the 2005 APSA Annual Meeting, Washington.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Gender and politics: the state of the art.” Politics 26/1, pp. 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psycho-analysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Doret, and Raaum, Nina C.. 1999. “Models of political mobilization.” In Bergqvist, et al., Equal Democracies, pp. 17–26.
Cingranelli, David L., and Richards, David L.. 2007. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. www.humanrightsdata.org.
Clark, Anne Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth, and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1998. “The sovereign limits of global civil society: a comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights and women.” World Politics 51/1, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavero, Sara, and Gilligan, Yvonne. 2007. “Women's substantive representation in the multi-level Euro polity: towards a framework for analysis.” Paper presented at the ECPR joint sessions, Helsinki, May 2007.
Cockburn, Cynthia. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations. Ithaca: ILR Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Adcock, Robert. 1999. “Democracy and dichotomies: a pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.” Annual Review of Political Science 2, pp. 537–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, Brady, Henry E., and Seawright, Jason. 2004. “Critiques, responses, and trade-offs: drawing together the debate.” In Brady and Collier, Rethinking Social Inquiry, pp. 195–227.
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research.” World Politics 49 (April), pp. 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Mahon, James E., 1993. “‘Conceptual stretching’ revisited: adapting categories in comparative analysis.” American Political Science Review 87/4 (December), pp. 845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1994. “Shifting the center: race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood.” In Bassin, Donna, Honey, Margaret, and Keplan, Merle Mahrer (eds.), Representations of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 56–74.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1997. “Comment on Hekman's “Truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited': Where's the power?Signs 22, pp. 375–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. “Its all in the family: intersections of gender, race and nation.” Hypatia 13, pp. 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 2002. Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Marjorie, Connolly. 1996. “After the election: the numbers: portrait of the electorate,” New York Times, November 10, 1996, Section 1, P. 28, Col. 1.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.” In Apter, David E., ed., Ideology and Discontent. London: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 206–61.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M., and Cohen, Carl. 1990. Introduction to Logic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ann, Costain. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosalind, Coward. 1983. Patriarchal Precedents: Sexuality and Social Relations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Katherine, Cramer Walsh. 2002. “Female legislators and the women's rights agenda.” In Rosenthal, Cindy Simon (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 370–96.Google Scholar
Nikki, Craske, and Molyneux, Maxine (eds.). 2002. Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. London: Palgrave.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color.” Stanford Law Review (Special Issue: Women of Color at the Center: Selections from the Third National Conference on Women of Color and the Law), No. 6 (July), pp. 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1993. “Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex.” In Weisberg, D. Kelly (ed.), Feminist Legal Theory, vol. 1: Foundations. New York: New York University Press, pp. 383–95.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1994. “Mapping the margins.” In Fineman, Martha Albertson and Mykitiuk, Roxanne (eds.), The Public Nature of Private Violence. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–118.Google Scholar
Crompton, Rosemary (ed.). 1999. Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crompton, Rosemary (ed.). 2006. Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1986a. “Introduction.” In Dahlerup, The New Women's Movement, pp. 1–26.
Drude, Dahlerup (ed.). 1986b. The New Women's Movement. Bristol: Sage.
Drude, Dahlerup (ed.). 1988. “From a small to a large minority: women in Scandinavian politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11/4, pp. 275–98.
Drude, Dahlerup (ed.). 1993. “From movement protest to state feminism: the women's movement and unemployment policy in Denmark.” NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies 1, pp. 4–21.
Drude, Dahlerup (ed.). 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. London and New York: Routledge.
Mary, Daly. 2000. The Gender Division of Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mary, Daly, and Lewis, Jane. 2000. “The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states.” British Journal of Sociology 51/2, pp. 281–98.Google Scholar
Mary, Daly, and Rake, Katherine. 2003. Gender and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 2001. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Christine, di Pizan. 1999. The Treasure of the City of the Ladies. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Irene, Diamond, and Hartsock, Nancy. 1981. “Beyond interests in politics: a comment on Virginia Sapiro's “When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women.” American Political Science Review 75/3, pp. 717–21.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry J., Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour M. (eds.). 1988. Democracy in Developing Countries. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Diamond, Larry J., Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour M. (eds.). 1990. Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Mario, Diani. 1992. “The concept of social movement.” Sociological Review 40 (February), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Diaz, Mercedes Mateo. 2005. Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christine, DiStefano. 1983. “Masculinity as ideology in political theory: Hobbesian man reconsidered.” Women's Studies International Forum 6 (1983), pp. 633–44.Google Scholar
Christine, DiStefano. 1991. Configurations of Masculinity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
DiStefano, Christine. 2006. Personal conversation. August 30. Philadelphia.
Alexandra, Dobrowolsky, and Hart, Vivien (eds.). 2003. Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Dodson, Debra. 2006. The Impact of Women on Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debra, Dodson, et al. 1995. Voices, Views, Votes: the Impact of Women in the 103rd Congress. New Jersey: Rutgers.Google Scholar
Dolan, Julie. 1997. “Support for women's interests in the 103rd Congress: the distinct impact of congressional women.” Women & Politics 18/4, pp. 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynthia, Donovan. 2007. “Gender and governance.” In Bevir, Mark (ed.), Encylopedia of Governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 545–51.Google Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable descriptive representatives: will just any woman, black, or Latino do?American Political Science Review 96/4, pp. 729–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzanne, Dovi. 2007. The Good Representative. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Georgia, Duerst-Lahti. 2002a. “Knowing Congress as a gendered institution: manliness and the implications of women in Congress.” In Rosenthal, Cindy Simon (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Georgia, Duerst-Lahti. 2002b. “Governing institutions, ideologies, and gender: toward the possibility of equal political representation.” Sex Roles 47/7–8 (October), pp. 371–88.Google Scholar
Georgia, Duerst-Lahti. 2006. “Presidential elections as gendered space”. In Carroll, Sue and Fox, Richard (eds.), Gender and the 2004 Election. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Georgia, Duerst-Lahti, and Kelly, Rita Mae (eds.). 1995. Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Duncan, Simon. 1995. “Theorizing European gender systems.” Journal of European Social Policy 5/4, pp. 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Simon. 1996. “The diverse worlds of European patriarchy.” In Garcia-Ramon, Maria Dolors and Janice, Monk (eds.), Women of the European Union: The Politics of Work and Daily Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 74–110.Google Scholar
Durose, Catherine and Francesca, Gains. 2007. “Engendering the machinery of governance.” In Annesley, Claire, Gains, Francesca and Rummery, Kirstein (eds.), Women and New Labour. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar
Daisy, Dwyer, and Bruce, Judith (eds.). 1988. A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
William, Easterly. 2006. The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin.
Ehlers, Tracy Bachrach. 1991. “Debunking marianismo: economic vulnerability and survival strategies among Guatemalan wives.” Ethnology 30/1, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, Eisenstein. 1990. “Femocrats, official feminism and the uses of power.” In Watson, Sophie (ed.), Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions. London: Verso, pp. 87–103.Google Scholar
Hester, Eisenstein. 1996. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Zillah, Eisenstein. 2001. Manmade Breast Cancers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Amy, Elman, R.. 1996. Sexual Subordination and State Intervention: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Providence and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Amy, Elman, R.. 2003. “Refuge in reconfigured states: shelter movements in the United States, Britain and Sweden.” In Banaszak, , Beckwith, , and Rucht, , Women's Movements facing the Reconfigured State, pp. 94–113.
Behtke, Elshtain, Jean. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Diane, Elson. 1995. “Male bias in macro economics: the case of structural adjustment.” In Elson, Diane (ed.), Male Bias in the Development Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Julia, Epstein, and Straub, Kristina. 1995. Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Catherine, Eschle, 2001. Global Democracy, Social Movements, and Feminism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Catherine, Eschle, and Maiguashca, Bice (eds.). 2005. Critical Theories, International Relations, and “The Anti-Globalisation Movement.”: The Politics of Global Resistance. London: Routledge.
Gøsta, Esping-Andersen. 1985. Politics Against Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gøsta, Esping-Andersen. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gøsta, Esping-Andersen. (ed.). 1993. Changing Classes: Stratification in Postindustrial Societies. London: Sage.
Gøsta, Esping-Andersen. (ed.). 1996. Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
Gøsta, Esping-Andersen. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, and Korpi, Walter. 1987. “From poor relief to institutional welfare states: the development of Scandinavian social policy.” In Erikson, Robert, Hansen, Erik Jørgen, Ringen, Stein and Uusitalo, Hannu (eds.), The Scandinavian Model. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
Gustavo, Esteva. 1985. “Development: metaphor, myth, threat,” Development: Seeds of Change 8, p. 78.Google Scholar
Heinz, Eulau. 1967. “Changing views of representation.” In Pool, Ithiel de Sola (ed.), Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 53–85.Google Scholar
Heinz, Eulau. et al. 1978. “The role of the representative: some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund Burke.” In Eulau, Heinz and Wahlke, John C. (eds.), The Politics of Representation. Continuities in Theory and Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
David, Farrell. 2006. “Inclusiveness of electoral systems.” Paper presented at the seminar Inclusive Politics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, May 29.
Anne, Fausto-Sterling. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard E. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Abby, Ferber, 1998. “Deconstructing whiteness: the intersections of race and gender in white supremacist thought.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984. The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1993. The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Ferree, Myra. 1991–2. “Institutionalizing gender equality: feminist politics and equality offices.” German Politics and Society. 24–5 (Winter), pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Marx, Ferree, Myra. 2006. “Globalization and feminism: opportunities and obstacles for activism in the global arena.” In Ferree and Tripp, Global Feminism, pp. 3–23.
Marx, Ferree, Myra, and Hess, Beth B.. 1985. Controversy and Coalition: The New Feminist Movement. Boston: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Ferree, Myra, and Mueller, Carol. 2004. “Feminism and the women's movement: a global perspective.” In Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 576–607.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Tripp, Aili Mari (eds.). 2006. Global Feminism: Transnational Women's Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Liñan, Anibal S. Pérez, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2007. “The effects of US foreign assistance on democracy building 1990–2003,” World Politics 59/3, pp. 404–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthew, Flinders. 2002. “Governance in Whitehall.” Public Administration 80/1, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
Peter, Flora (ed.). 1986. Growth to Limits, vols. I, II, IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Peter, Flora, and Heidenheimer, Arnold (eds.). 1981. The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Fogg-Davis, Hawley. 2006. “Theorizing black lesbians within black feminism: a critique of same race street harassment.” Politics & Gender 2, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2003. “‘State feminism’ and women's movements: the impact of Chile's Servicio Nacional de la Mujer on women's activism.” Latin American Research Review 38/1, pp. 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Susan, Franceschet, and Mona, Lena Krook. 2005. “State Feminism and Gender Quotas in the ‘North’ and ‘South’: Comparative Lessons from Western Europe and Latin America.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meetings, March 22–5, 2005, San Diego.
Franzway, Suzanne, Court, Dianne, and Connell, R. W. (1989). Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. “Struggle over needs: outline of a socialist-feminist critical theory of late capitalist political culture.” In Fraser, Nancy (ed.), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Honneth, Axel. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Frederickson, George. “Reflections on the comparative history and sociology of racism.” In Harris, Leonard (ed.), Racism. Amherst: Humanity Books.
Freedom House. 2007. www.freedomhouse.org (map from 2006).
Freeman, Jo. 1995. “From seeds to harvest: transformations of feminist organizations and scholarship.” In Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey (eds.), Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth Jay. 2003. “Gendering the agenda: the impact of transnational women's rights movements at the UN conferences of the 1990s.” Women's Studies International Forum 26/3, pp. 1007–39.Google Scholar
Frohmann, Alicia, and Valdés, Teresa. 1995. “Democracy in the country and in the home: the women's movement in Chile.” In Basu, Amrit (ed.), The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women's Movements in Global Perspectives. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 302–23.Google Scholar
Funk, and Wagnalls, , 1997. Funk and Wagnalls' New International Dictionary of the English Language, Comprehensive Edition. Chicago: Ferguson Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Furniss, Norman, and Tilton, Timothy. 1977. The Case for the Welfare State. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kligman, Gail (eds.). 2000. The Politics of Gender After Socialism: A Comparative Historical Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galey, Margaret E. 1995. “Forerunners in women's quest for partnership.” In Winslow, Anne (ed.), Women, Politics, and the United Nations. Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Galligan, Yvonne, Clavero, Sara, and Calloni, Marina. 2007. Gender Politics and Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Frances (ed.). 1997. Sex Equality Policy in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gasiorwoski, Mark J. (1996). “An overview of the political regime change dataset.” Comparative Political Studies, 29/4, pp. 469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastil, Raymond D. 1978. Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1978. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Anne Hélène. 1996. The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialized Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Ideology as a Cultural System.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, pp. 193–233.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce. 2003. Gender Policies in Japan and the United States: Comparing Women's Movements, Rights and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Susan. 2004. Another World is Possible if…London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 1997. “Ideology: a definitional analysis.” Political Research Quarterly 50/4, pp. 957–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1982. “Action, structure, power.” In Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 1995, “Globalization, market civilization and disciplinary neoliberalism.” Millennium 23/3, pp. 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Girvetz, Harry K. 1968. “Welfare state”, in Sills, David L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. XVI. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, pp. 512–21.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco. 1995. “Outcomes of new social movements.” In Kriesi, et al. (eds.), New Social Movements in Western Europe, pp. 207–37.
Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. (eds.). 1999. How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2005. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie (ed.). 1997. Getting Institutions Right for Women in Development. London: Zed.
Goetz, Anne Marie (ed.). 2007. “Political cleaners: women as the new anti-corruption force?Development and Change 38/1, pp. 87–105.CrossRef
Goldstein, Joshua. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet, and Meyers, Marcia. 2003. Families that Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet C., Meyers, Marcia K., and Ross, Katherin E.. 1997. “Supporting the employment of mothers: policy variation across fourteen welfare states.” Journal of European Social Policy 7, pp. 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealand's women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55/1, pp. 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2006. “Out of sight, out of mind: the New Zealand women's movement in abeyance.” Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, July 9–13.
Griffiths, A. Phillips. 1960. “How can one person represent another?Aristotelian Society supplementary volume 34, pp. 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gunther-Canada, Wendy. 2001. Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Siv. 1994. “Childcare and types of welfare states.” In Sainsbury, Gendering Welfare States, pp. 45–61.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Pollack, Mark A.. 2002. “Mainstreaming gender in global governance.” European Journal of International Relations 8/3, pp. 339–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Malcolm B. 1987. “The elements of the concept of ideology.” Political Studies 35, pp. 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007a. “When mulitiplication doesn't equal quick addition: examining intersectionality as a research paradigm.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (March 1), pp. 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007b. “Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm.” Politics & Gender 3/2, pp. 248–53.Google Scholar
Hantrais, Linda. 1999. Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. “The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory.” Signs 11/4, pp. 645–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Angela P. 1990. “Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory.” Stanford Law Review 42 (February), pp. 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Heidi I. 1979a. “Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex.” In Eisenstein, Zillah, (ed.), Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Heidi I. 1979b. “The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union.” Capital and Class 8 (Summer), pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Heidi I. 1994. “The family as the locus of gender, class and political struggle: the example of housework.” In Hermann, Anne C. and Stewart, Abigail J. (eds.), Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 171–97.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1983. Money, Sex, and Power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Hatem, Mervat F. 1992. “Economic and political liberation in Egypt and the demise of state feminism.” International Journal of Middle East Studies. 24, pp. 231–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatem, Mervat F. 1994. “The paradoxes of state feminism in Egypt.” In Nelson and Chowdhury (eds.). Women and Politics Worldwide, pp. 226–42.
Haussman, Melissa, and Sauer, Birgit (eds.). 2007. Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Women's Movements and State Feminism in Post Industrial Democracies. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 1997. “Confounding gender.” Signs 22/3, pp. 649–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2005. “Engendering political science: an immodest proposal.” Politics & Gender 1 (1 March), pp. 141–56.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2006. Feminist Inquiry: From Political Conviction to Methodological Innovation. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff. 1992. Men in the Public Eye. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold. 1973. “The politics of public education, health and welfare in the USA and western Europe: how growth and reform potential have differed.” British Journal of Political Science 3, pp. 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert. 1989. “Reflections: the triumph of capitalism.” The New Yorker (January 23).Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul. 1990. Representative Democracy and Its Limits. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, Barbara. 1994. “Solo mothers, social policy regimes, and the logics of gender.” In Sainsbury, Gendering Welfare States, pp. 170–86.
Hobson, Barbara, Lewis, Jane, and Siim, Birte. 2002. Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Barbara, and Lindholm, Marika. 1997. “Collective identities, women's power resources and the making of welfare states.” Theory and Society 26, pp. 475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, Barbara, and Takahashi, Mieko. 1996. “Care regimes, solo mothers and the recasting of social citizenship rights.” Engendering Citizenship, Work and Care, Seminar 1 of the EC Program “Gender and Citizenship: Social Integration and Social Exclusion in European Welfare States.” Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies, Wassenaar, The Netherlands (July).
Holliday, Ian. 2000, “Is the British state hollowing out?Political Quarterly 71/2 pp. 167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, bell. 1981. Ain't I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hooks, bell. 2000. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hoskyns, Catherine 2008. “Governing the European Union: gender and macroeconomics.” In Rai and Waylen (eds.), Global Governance, pp. 107–28.
Hoskyns, Catherine, and Rai, Shirin. 2007. “Recasting the global political economy: counting women's unpaid work.” New Political Economy 12/3 pp. 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Jude, and Mulligan, Diane (eds.). 2005. Gender and Civil Society: Transcending Boundaries. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2002. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2005. “What it means to study gender and the state.” Politics & Gender 1, pp. 157–65.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jones, Mark. 2002. “Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: electoral quotas and women's leadership in Latin America.” In Craske and Molyneux, Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, pp. 432–56.
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humana, Charles. 1992. World Human Rights Guide. 3rd edn. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th CenturyNorman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Aida. 1989. “Relating to privilege: seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color.” Signs 14, pp. 833–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Jaggar, Alison M., and Bordo, Susan R. (eds). 1989. Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1995. “Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data.” Journal of Peace Research 32, pp. 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan, Rounaq. 1995. Women and Development: The Elusive Agenda. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane. 1990. “Gender and justice in economic development.” In Tinker, Persistent Inequalities pp. 70–82.
Jaquette, Jane, and Staudt, Kathleen. 1985. “Women as ‘at risk’ reproducers: biology, science, and population in US foreign policy.” In Sapiro, Virginia, ed., Women, Biology and Public Policy, Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 235–68.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jane, and Staudt, Kathleen. 2006. “Women, gender and development.” In Jaquette and Summerfield, Women and Gender Equity, pp. 17–52.
Jaquette, Jane, and Summerfield, Gale (eds.). 2006. Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayawardena, Kumari. 1986. Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 1996. “Representations of difference: the varieties of French feminism.” In Threlfall, Mapping the Women's Movement: Feminist Politics and Social Transformation in the North, pp. 73–114.
Jenson, Jane. 1997. “Who cares? Gender and welfare regimes.” Social Politics 4/2, pp. 182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, Jane, and Sineau, Mariette. 2001. Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign. Toronto: Toronto University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Cathy Marie, Georgia, Duerst-Lahti, and Norton, Noelle. 2007. Creating Gender: The Sexual Politics of Welfare Policy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Jónasdóttir, Anna G. 1988. “On the concept of interests, women's interests and the limitation of interest theory.” In Jones, K. B. and Jónasdóttir, A. G. (eds.), The Political Interests of Gender. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Judge, David. 1999. Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Junn, Jane. 2007. “Square pegs and round holes: challenges of fitting individual-level analysis to a theory of politicized context of gender.” Politics & Gender 3 (March 1), pp. 124–34.Google Scholar
Kann, Mark E. 1991. On the Man Question: Gender and Civic Virtue in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kann, Mark E. 1998. A Republic of Men: The American Founders, Gendered Language, and Patriarchal Politics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kann, Mark E. 1999. The Gendering of American Politics: Founding Mothers, Founding Fathers, and Political Patriarchy. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. “Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.” American Journal of Sociology 82/5, pp. 965–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, J. 2006. Feminists Theorize the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Gisela. 1992. Contemporary Western European Feminism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Azza, Karam (ed.). 1998. Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. Stockholm: IDEA.
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1995. “Discursive politics and feminist activism in the Catholic Church.” In Myra, Marx Ferree and Patricia, Yancey Martin (eds.), Feminist Organizations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998a. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and Military. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998b. “Stepsisters: feminist movement activism in different institutional spaces.” In Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney (eds.), The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 195–216.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod, and Mueller, Catherine (eds.). 1987. The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds.). 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kelber, Mim. 1994. Women and Government: New Ways to Political Power. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. 1976. “Philosophy, theory, ideology: an attempt at clarification.” Political Theory 4, pp. 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald F. 1993. “Public administration: the state of the field.” In Finifter, Ada (ed.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, pp. 176–91.Google Scholar
Kilkey, Majella, and Bradshaw, Jonathan. 1999. “Lone mothers, economic well-being and policies.” in Sainsbury, Gender and Welfare State Regimes, pp. 147–84.
King, Gary, Robert, Keohane, and Sidney, Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kjaer, Anne Mette, 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Knijn, Trudie, and Kremer, Maria. 1997. “Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: towards inclusive citizenship.” Social Politics 4, pp. 328–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooiman, Jan (ed.). 1993. Modern Governance: New Government–Society Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Korpi, Walter. 1980. “Social policy and distributional conflicts in the capitalist democracies.” West European Politics 3, pp. 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1989. “Power, politics and state autonomy in the development of social citizenship.” American Sociological Review 54, pp. 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2000. “Faces of inequality: gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different welfare states.” Social Politics 7, pp. 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koven, Seth, and Michel, Sonya (eds.). 1993. Mothers of a New World: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States. New York: Routledge.
Kriesi, Hanspieter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Giugni, Marco G. (eds.). 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2004. “Gender quotas as a global phenomenon: actors and strategies in quota adoption.” European Political Science 3/3, pp. 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005. “Quota laws for women in politics: a new type of state feminism?” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research. Granada, Spain.
Kroska, Amy. 2000. “Conceptualizing and measuring gender ideology as an identity.” Gender & Society 14/3 (June), pp. 368–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Radha. 1995. “From Chipko to Sati: The Contemporary Indian Women's Movement.” In Basu, The Challenge of Local Feminisms, pp. 58–86.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert. 1962. Political Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, Leyenaar, Monique, Niemöller, Kees, and Galligan, Yvonne. 1999. Electoral Systems in Europe: A Gender Impact Assessment. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gerda. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Lévy, Martine. 1988. Le féminisme d'État en France, 1965–1985: 20 ans de prise en charge institutionelle de l'égalité professionelle entre hommes et femmes. Institut d'Études Politiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 1992. “Gender and the development of welfare regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2, pp. 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane. 1997. “Gender and welfare regimes: further thoughts.” Social Politics 4, pp. 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane, and Ostner, Ilona. 1991. “Gender and the evolution of European social policies.” Paper presented at the CES Workshop “Emergent Supranational European Social Policy: The EC's Social Dimension in Comparative Perspective,” Center for European Studies, Harvard University, November 15–17.
Lewis, Jane, and Ostner, Ilona. 1994. “Gender and the evolution of European social policies.” Working Paper No. 4/94, Centre of Social Policy Research, University of Bremen.
Lewis, Jane (ed.). 1993. Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.
Lewis, Jane (ed.). 1998. Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe. Brookfield, USA: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Leyenaar, M. 1997. How to Create a Gender Balance in Political Decision Making: A Guide to Implementing Policies for Increasing the Participation of Women in Political Decision Making. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, Debra J. 2002, “Gendering (trans)national advocacy: tracking the Iollapalooza at ‘home.’International Feminist Journal of Politics 4/2, pp. 173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Governments in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, pp. 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Merle. 1988. “Capitalism and apartheid.” In Lonsdale, John (ed.), South Africa in Question. Cambridge: University of Cambridge African Studies Centre and Heinemann Educational Books, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 1994. “‘She has other duties’ – women, citizenship and social security.” In Baldwin, Sally and Falkingham, Jane (eds.), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 111–28.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorber, Judith. 1987. “Believing is seeing: biology as ideology.” Gender & Society 2, pp. 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Women and European Politics: Contemporary Feminism and Public Policy. London: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni 1998. “Gendering research in political science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1, pp. 333–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni 2005a. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni 2005b. “Introduction: state feminism and the political representation of women.” In Lovenduski, , State Feminism and Political Representation, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni 2005c. “One stop equality or state feminism?” Paper presented at the ECPR Meeting, Granada, Spain.
Lovenduski, Joni (ed.). 2006. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovenduski, Joni, Baudino, Claudie, Guadagnini, Marila, Meier, Petra, and Sainsbury, Diane. 2006. “Conclusions: state feminism and political representation.” In Lovenduski, , ed., State Feminism and Political Representation, pp. 260–93.
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster women: the politics of presence.” Political Studies 51/1, pp. 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, Sidney. 1904. The Governance of England. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Karl. 1953. “The role of ideologies in political change.” International Social Science Bulletin 5/1, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 1994. “Purity, impurity and separation.” Signs 19, pp. 458–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijeholt, Lycklama à, Geertje, Joke Swiebel, and Vargas, Virginia. 1998. “The global institutional framework: the long march to Beijing.” In Lycklama à Nijeholt, Vargas, and Wieringa, Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, pp. 25–48.
Nijeholt, Lycklama à, Geertje, Virginia Vargas, and Wieringa, Saskia (eds.). 1998. Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean. New York: Garland.
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., Zald, Mayer N.. 1988. “Social movements.” In Smelser, Neil J., ed., Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 695–737.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., Zald, Mayer N. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorothy, McBride Stetson,. 1987. Women's Rights in France. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Dorothy, McBride Stetson (ed.). 2001. Abortion Politics, Women's Movements and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dorothy, McBride Stetson, and Mazur, Amy. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dorothy, McBride Stetson, and Mazur, Amy 2006.“Building a (data) bank while crossing the bridge: RNGS strategies to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods.” Submitted to Perspectives on Politics. Summer.
Leslie, McCall,. 2000. “Gender and the New Inequality: Explaining the College/Noncollege Wage Gap.” American Sociological Review 65, pp. 234–55.Google Scholar
Leslie, McCall, 2001. Complex Inequality: Gender, Class, and Race in the New Economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leslie, McCall, 2005. “The complexity of intersectionality.” Signs 30, pp. 1771–800.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., and Campbell, Karen E.. 2001. “Winning the vote in the West: the political successes of the women's suffrage movement, 1866–1919.” Gender & Society 15, pp. 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Campbell, Karen E., Granberg, Ellen M., and Mowery, Christine. 2001. “How movements win: gendered opportunity structures and US women's suffrage movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review 66/1, pp. 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, Hoffmann, Paul J., and O'Hara, Rosemary. 1960. “Issue conflict and consensus among party leaders and followers.” American Political Science Review 54 (June), pp. 406–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFate, Katherine, Lawson, Roger, and Wilson, William Julius (eds.). 1995. Poverty, Inequality and the Future of Social Policy. New York: Russell Sage.
Mackay, Fiona 2004. “Gender and political representation in the UK: the state of the discipline.” Journal of Politics and International Relations 6/1: pp. 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, Myers, Fiona, and Brown, Alice, 2003. “Towards a new politics? Women and the constitutional change in Scotland.” In Dobrowolsky, Alexandra and Hart, Vivien (eds.), Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1983. “Feminism, Marxism, method and the state: toward feminist jurisprudence.” Signs 8, pp. 635–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. “Difference and dominance: on sex discrimination.” In Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 32–45.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain 1991. “Forms of representation and systems of voting.” In Held, David (ed.), Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 172–96.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain (ed.). 1996. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. “A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research.” Political Analysis 14, pp. 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 26, pp. 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Brinks, Daniel, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2001. “Classifying political regimes in Latin America, 1945–1999.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36, pp. 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1996. “What is the feminist movement?” In Ferree, Myra Marx and Hess, Beth B. (eds.), Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane 1998. The Many Faces of Representation: working papers. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane 1999. “Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes.’Journal of Politics 61/3, pp. 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane 2003. “Rethinking representation.” American Political Science Review 97/4, pp. 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, and Tate, Katherine. 1992. “Race trumps gender: the Thomas nomination in the black community.” PS: Political Science and Politics 25, pp. 488–92.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. “The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life.” American Political Science Review 78, pp. 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, Diane Rothbard. 1993. “Women's movements around the world: cross-cultural comparisons.” Gender & Society 7/3 (September), pp. 279–99.Google Scholar
Marin, L. 2001. On Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, Davenport, Christian, and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. “Polity IV, 1800–1999: comments on Munck and Verkuilen.” Comparative Political Studies 35, pp. 40–5.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. 1970. The German Ideology. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard. 1995. “How the election system structure has helped women close the representation gap.” In Karvonen, Lauri and Selle, Per (eds.), Women in Nordic Politics: Closing the Gap. Brookfield: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard, and Montgomery, Kathleen. 2005. Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Nancy. 1993. “Surmounting a legacy: the expansion of racial diversity in a local anti-rape movement.” In Bart, Pauline B. and Moran, Eileen Gail (eds.), Violence Against Women: The Bloody Footprints. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 177–92.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 1995. Gender Bias and the State: Symbolic Reform at Work in Fifth Republic France. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2007a. “Comparative feminist policy” In Rabin, Jack (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. London: Taylor & Francis, vol. I/1, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2007b. “Women's policy agencies, women's movements and a shifting political context: toward a gendered republic in France?” In Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna (eds.), Changing State Feminism: Women's Policy Agencies Confront Shifting Institutional Terrain. New York: Palgrave/MacMillan, pp. 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G., and McBride, Dorothy. 2006. “The RNGS dataset: women's policy agencies, women's movements and policy debates in western post industrial democracies.” French Politics 4/2, pp. 209–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy (ed.). 2001. State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. London and New York: Routledge.
Meier, Petra. 2002. “Guaranteeing Representation: Democratic Logic or Deficit? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Techniques Enhancing Representativeness and the Argumentation on Their Behalf in a Plural Society.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Messner, Michael. 1997. The Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, Birgit. 2003. “Much ado about nothing? Political representation policies and the influence of women parliamentarians in Germany.” Review of Policy Research 20/3, pp. 401–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Mary K., and Prugl, Elisabeth (eds.). 1999. Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Miller, Carol, and Razavi, Shahra (eds.). 1998. Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions. London: Intermediate Technologies, with UNRISD.CrossRef
Minar, David W. 1961. “Ideology and political behavior.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (November), pp. 750–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1990. “The lady and the tramp: gender, race and the origins of the American welfare state.” In Gordon, Linda (ed.), Women, the State and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 92–122.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn 1995. The Wages of Motherhood: Inequality in the Welfare State, 1917–1942. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh. 1977. Society and Social Policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Misra, Joya, and Akins, Frances. 1998. “The welfare state and women: structure, agency and diversity.” Social Politics (Fall), pp. 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mkandawire, Thandika. 2004. “Social policy in a development context: introduction.” In Mkandawire, Thandika (ed.), Social Policy in a Development Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. “Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses.” In Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Torres, Lourdes M., and Russo, Ann (eds.), Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine. 1985. “Mobilization without emancipation? Women's interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua.” Feminist Studies 11/2 (Summer), pp. 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine 1998. “Analysing women's movements.” In Jackson, Cecile and Pearson, Ruth. (eds.), Feminist Visions of Development. London: Routledge, pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine, and Razavi, Shahra. 2003. Gender Justice, Development and Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molyneux, Maxine, and Razavi, Shahra 2006. Beijing Plus 10: An Ambivalent Record on Gender Justice. Geneva: UNRISD Occasional Paper 15.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2003. “The politics of mothers' employment: France in comparative perspective.” World Politics 55, pp. 259–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work–Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Caroline O. N. 1993. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, Johnathon W., and Knutsen, Torbjorn L.. 2007. Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, Maitrayee, and Wong, Franz (eds.). 2006. Revisiting Gender Training: The Making and Remaking of Gender Knowledge. Amsterdam: KIT (Royal Tropical Institute).
Muller, Edward. 1988. “Democracy, economic development and income inequalityAmerican Sociological Review 53 (February), pp. 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward 1995. “Income inequality and democracy revisited: reply to Bollen and Jackman.” American Sociological Review 60, pp. 990–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, Willard A. 1974. “Sartori's concept of ideology: a dissent and an alternative.” In Wilcox, Allen R. (ed)., Public Opinion and Political Attitudes. New York: Wiley, pp. 223–37.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and measuring democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 35, pp. 5–34.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig 2002. “Global governance: poorly done and poorly understood.” International Affairs 76/4, pp. 789–804.Google Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce. 2005. “Girl power, mainstreaming and critical mass: women's leadership and policy paradigm in Germany's red-green coalition, 1998–2002.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 27/1–2, pp. 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, Nancy A. 1998. “Toward a multiracial, feminist, social-democratic praxis: lessons from grassroots warriors in the US war on poverty.” Social Politics (Fall), pp. 286–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naples, Nancy A., and Desai, Manisah (eds.). 2002. Women's Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles and Transnational Politics. New York and London: Routledge.
Narayan, Uma. 1997a. “Cross-cultural connections, border-crossings, and “death by culture.” In Narayan, Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism, pp. 81–118.
Narayan, Uma 1997b. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions and Third World Feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nechemias, Carol 1994. “Democratization and women's access to legislative seats: the Soviet case, 1989–1991.” Women & Politics 14/3, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara J. 1989. “Women and knowledge in political science: texts, histories, and epistemologies.” Women & Politics 9/2. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara J., and Chowdhury, Najima (eds.). 1994. Women and Politics Worldwide. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nettl, J. P. 1967. Political Mobilization: A Sociological Analysis of Methods and Concepts. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Newman, Janet. 2005a. “Introduction.” In Newman, Janet (ed.), Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Janet 2005b. “Regendering governance.” In Newman, Janet (ed.), Remaking Governance: People, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. 1994. “Interpreting gender.” Signs 20/(Autumn), pp. 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Ruth. 1983. Equality Legislation in a Comparative Perspective: Towards State Feminism. Copenhagen: Women's Research Center in Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 2007. Global Outlaws: Crime, Money, and Power in the Contemporary World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norton, N. 1995. “Women, it's not enough to be elected: committee position makes a difference.” In Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, Rita Mae (eds.), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 115–40.Google Scholar
Norton, N. 2002. “Transforming policy from the inside: participating in committee.” In Rosenthal, C. (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 316–40.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1993. Does Parliament Matter?London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1992. “Human functioning and social justice: in defense of Aristotelian essentialism.” Political Theory 20/2, pp. 202–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1993. “Non-relative virtues: an Aristotelian approach.” In Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., and Glover, Jonathan (eds.). 1995. Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef
O'Brien, Robert, Goetz, Anne Marie, Scholte, Jan Aart, and Williams, Marc. 2000. Contesting Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Julia S. 1993. “Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes.” British Journal of Sociology 44, pp. 501–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Julia S. 1996. “From women in the welfare state to gendering welfare state regimes.” Current Sociology 44/2, pp. 1–124.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Julia S., Orloff, Ann Shola, and Shaver, Sheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Offen, Karen 2000. European Feminisms 1700–1950: A Political History. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Brenda, and Gidengil, Elisabeth (eds.). 2006. Gender and Social Capital. New York: Routledge.
O'Regan, Valerie. 2000. Gender Matters. Female Policymakers' Influence in Industrialized Nations. Westport and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. “Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of state policies and gender relations.” American Sociological Review 58, pp. 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola 1996. “Gender in the welfare state.” Annual Review of Sociology 22, pp. 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1992. “‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands: mission or career?” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research. Limerick.
Outshoorn, Joyce 1994. “Between movement and government: ‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands.” In Kriesi, Hanspeter (ed.), Yearbook of Swiss Political Science. Bern, Stuttgart and Vienna: Paul Haupt Verlag, pp. 141–65.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce(ed.). 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States and the Globalisation of Sex Commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Outshoorn, Joyce, and Kantola, Johanna (eds.). 2007. Changing State Feminism: Women's Policy Agencies Confront Shifting Institutional Terrain. London: Palgrave/MacMillan.CrossRef
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-salient issues and group representation: support for women candidates in the 1992 Senate elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39/2, pp. 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, Robert. 1982. “Interests and the politics of choice.” Political Theory 10/4, pp. 547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parpart, Jane L., Rai, Shirin M., and Staudt, Kathleen. 2002. Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in A Global/Local World. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pascall, Gillian, and Manning, Nick. 2000. “Gender and social policy: comparing welfare states in central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.” Journal of European Social Policy 10, pp. 269–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1983. “Feminist critiques of the public-private dichotomy.” In Benn, Stanley I. and Gaus, G. F. (eds.), The Public and the Private in Social Life. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Hughes, Melanie. 2007. Women, Politics and Power: A Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie, and Green, Jennifer. 2006. “The international women's movement and women's political representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71, pp. 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2000. “Women's suffrage in the measurement of democracy: problems of operationalization.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35, pp. 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennock, Rowland. 1968. “Political representation: an overview.” In Pennock, J. Rowland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Representation: Nomos X. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 1992. “Public policy and public bureaucracy.” In Ashford, Douglas (ed.), History and Context in Comparative Public Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy, and Pierre, Jon. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Peterson, John. 2003. “Policy networks.” Political Science Working Paper Series 90, July, University of Vienna, available at www.his.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_90.pdf
Pfau-Effinger, Birgit. 1999. “The modernization of family and motherhood in western Europe.” In Crompton Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment, pp. 60–79.
Pfau-Effinger, Birgit 2005. “Development paths in care arrangements in the framework of family values and welfare values.” In Pfau-Effinger, Birgit and Geissler, Birgit (eds.), Care and Social Integration in European Societies. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne 1998. “Democracy and representation: or, why should it matter who our representatives are?” In Phillips, Anne (ed.), Feminism and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 224–40.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Three worlds of welfare state research.” Comparative Political Studies 33, pp. 791–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1969. Representation. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox. 1990. “Ideology and the state: Women, power and the welfare state.” in Gordon, Linda (ed.), Women, the State and Welfare. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 226–49.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pringle, Rosemary, and Watson, S., 1992. “Women's interests and the post structuralist state.” In Barrett, Michele and Phillips, Anne (eds.), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
Prugl, L. 2008. “Gender and the institutions of global markets: an exploration of the agricultural sector.” In Rai, and Waylen (eds.), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, pp. 43–63.
Adam, Przeworski,, Alvarez, Michael, Zhebub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purdy, Elisabeth R. 1991. The Representation of Women and Women's Issues: Differences in Voting Patterns of Male and Female Members of the House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. 1994. The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin. (ed.). 2003a. Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State? Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRef
Rai, Shirin 2003b. “Institutional mechanisms for the advancement of women: mainstreaming gender, democratizing the state?” In Rai, Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State?, pp. 15–39.
Rai, Shirin. 2008. “Analysing global governance.” In Rai, Shirin and Waylen, Georgina (eds.), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, Shirin, and Lievesley, Geraldine (eds.). 1996. Women and the State: International Perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.
Rai, Shirin, and Waylen, Georgina. 2008. “Introduction: feminist perspectives on analysing and transforming global governance.” In Rai, Shirin and Waylen, Georgina (eds.), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainwater, Lee, Rein, Martin, and Schwartz, Joseph. 1986. Income Packaging in the Welfare State: A Comparative Study of Family Income. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O., Soysal, Yasemin, and Shanahan, Suzanne. 1997. “The changing logic of political citizenship: cross-national acquisition of women's suffrage rights, 1890–1990.” American Sociological Review 62 (October), pp. 735–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razavi, Shahra, and Hassim, Shireen (eds.). 2006. Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context: Uncovering the Gendered Structure of “the Social.”Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRef
Reich, Gary. 2002. “Categorizing political regimes: new data for old problems.” Democratization 9, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of representation among female and male state legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17/4, pp. 509–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rejai, Mostafa. 1991. Political Ideologies: A Comparative Approach. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Remmer, K. (1991). “New wine or old bottlenecks? The study of Latin American democracy.” Comparative Politics 23, pp. 479–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revillard, Anne. 2007. “La cause des femmes dans l'état: une comparaison France–Quebec (1965–2007).” Doctoral thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan.
Revillard, Anne, and Bereni, Laure. 2007. “Des quotas à la parité: ‘féminisme d’État' et représentation politique (1974–2007).” Genèses 2/67, pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Rod. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of Women Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
,RNGS. 2006. Project description. Available at http://libarts.wsu.edu/polisci/rngs.
Robinson, Jean. 1995. “Women, the state, and the need for civil society: the Liga Kobiet in Poland.” In McBride Stetson and Mazur (eds.), Comparative State Feminism, pp. 203–20.
Robinson, Richard. 1950. Definition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R. 1990. “Political movements and state authority in liberal democracies.” World Politics 42 (January), pp. 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R. 1998. Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism, and Changing Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R., and Mazmanian, Daniel A.. 1993. “Social movements and the policy process.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528, pp. 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. 1989. Culture and Truth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Rachel A., and Ward, Kathryn B.. 1996. “Evolution of the contemporary US women's movement.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 19, pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Benita. 2004. Separate Roads to Feminism: Black, Chicana and White Feminist Movements in America's Second Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Marilyn. 1998. Women in Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, Mary. 1984. The State and Working Women: A Comparison of Britain and Sweden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diane, Sainsbury (ed.). 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.
Diane, Sainsbury 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diane, Sainsbury(ed.). 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diane, Sainsbury 2001. “Gender and the making of welfare states: Norway and Sweden.” Social Politics 8, pp. 113–43.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women.” The American Political Science Review 75/3, pp. 701–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia 1991. “Gender politics, gendered politics: the state of the field.” In Crotty, William J. (ed.), Political Science: Looking to the Future. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 165–87.Google Scholar
Sartoris, Giovanni. 1969. “Politics, ideology, and belief systems.” American Journal of Political Science 63, pp. 358–411.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni 1970. “Concept misformation in comparative politics.” American Political Science Review 64, pp. 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni 1984. “Guidelines for concept analysis.” In Sartori, Giovanni (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 15–85.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Savage, Michael, and Witz, Anne (eds.) 1993. Gender and Bureaucracy, Oxford: Blackwell.
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The representative claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5/3, pp. 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian 2000. “Parliamentary representation of women: from discourses of justice to strategies of accountability.” International Political Science Review 21/4, pp. 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene. 1985. Women in the History of Political Thought: Ancient Greece to Machiavelli. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz, and Schmidt, Vivien A. (eds.). 2000. Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Schild, V. 1998. “Market citizenship and new democracies: the ambiguous legacies of contemporary Chilean women's movements.” Social Politics 5/2, pp. 232–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1993. “Gendered labour market participation.” In Castles, Francis G. (ed.), Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policies in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company, pp. 179–237.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1974. “Still the century of corporatism.” Review of Politics 36/1, pp. 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1991. “What democracy is…and is not.” Journal of Democracy 2 (Summer), pp. 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schochet, Gordon J. 1975. Patriarchalism in Political Thought: The Authoritarian Family and Political Speculation and Attitudes Especially in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Scott, Catherine. 1995. Gender and Development: Rethinking Modernization and Dependency Theory. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1986. “Gender a useful category of historical analysis.” American Historical Review 91, pp. 1053–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1990a. “Gender and cooperative conflicts.” In Tinker, Persistent Inequalities, pp. 123–49.
Sen, Amartya 1990b. “More than 100 million women are missing.” New York Review of Books, December 20.Google Scholar
Sen, Gita, and Grown, Caren. 1987. Development, Crises, and Alternative Visions: Third World Women's Perspectives. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon, and Pateman, Carole (eds.). 1991. Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Shapiro, Judith. 1991. “Transexualism: reflections on the persistence of gender and the mutability of sex.” In Epstein, and Straub, , Body Guards, pp. 248–79.
Siaroff, Alan. 1994. “Work, welfare and gender equality: a new typology.” in Sainsbury, , Gendering Welfare States, pp. 82–100.
Siim, Birte. 1991. “Welfare state, gender politics and equality policies: women's citizenship in the Scandinavian welfare states.” In Meehan, Elizabeth and Sevenhuijsen, Selma (eds.), Equality Politics and Gender. London: Sage, pp. 175–92.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte 2000. Gender and Citizenship: Politics and Agency in France, Great Britain and Denmark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Rina. 1998. Gender Autonomy in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivard, R. 1985. Women: A World Survey. Washington, DC: World Priorities.Google Scholar
Skjeie, Hege. 1997. “Review of Comparative State Feminism.” Contemporary Sociology 26/3, pp. 339–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjeie, Hege 1998. “Credo on difference: women in parliament in Norway. In Karam, , Women in Parliament, pp. 183–9.
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research.” In Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.), Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Amenta, Edwin. 1986. “States and social policies.” Annual Review of Sociology 12, pp. 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Andrea. 2001. “Violence against women of color.” In Blackwell, Mayleiet al. (eds.), Time to Rise: US Women of Color: Issues and Strategies. Berkeley: Women of Color Resource Center, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
Smith, Bonnie G. (ed.). 2000. Global Feminisms since 1945. London: Routledge.
Smooth, Wendy. 2006. “Intersectionality in electoral politics: a mess worth making.” Politics & Gender 2, pp. 400–14.Google Scholar
Sobolewski, M. 1968. “Electors and representatives: a contribution to the theory of representation.” In Pennock, J. Rowland and Chapman, John W. (eds.), Representation. Nomos X. New York: Atherton Press, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential Woman. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Squires, J. 1996. “Quotas for women: fair representation?Parliamentary Affairs 49/1, pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith. 1999. Gender in Political Theory. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith, and Mark, Wickham-Jones. 2004. “New Labour, gender mainstreaming, and the Women and Equality Unit.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6/1, pp. 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen. 1985. Women, Foreign Assistance and Advocacy Administration. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen. 1990. Managing Development: State, Society, and International Contexts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen (ed.). 1997. Women, International Development and Politics: The Bureaucratic Mire. Pittsburgh: Temple University Press.
Staudt, Kathleen. 1998. Policy, Politics and Gender: Women Gaining Ground. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen. 2002. “Dismantling the master's house with the master's tools? Gender work in and with powerful bureaucracies.” In Saunders, Kriemild (ed.), Feminist Post-development Thought: Rethinking Modernity, Post-colonialism and Representation. London: Zed, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen. 2003. “Gender mainstreaming: conceptual links to institutional machineries.” In Rai, , Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State?, pp. 40–66.
Staudt, Kathleen. 2008. Violence and Activism at the Border: Gender, Fear, and Everyday Life in Ciudad Juárez. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Staudt, Kathleen, Rai, Shirin, and Parpart, Jane. 2001. “Protesting world trade rules: can we talk about empowerment?Signs, 26/4, pp. 1251–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Evelyn. 1973a. “Machismo and marianismo.” Society 10, pp. 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Evelyn. 1973b “Marianismo: the other face of machismo.” In Female and Male in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
Stevens, Jacqueline. 1999. Reproducing the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stoffel, Sophie. 2008. “Does state feminism contribute to state retrenchment in the field of women's rights? The case of Chile since the return of democracy.” Representation: Special issue on the Substantive Representation of Women 44/2.Google Scholar
Stokes, Wendy. 2005. Women in Contemporary Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2004. “Affirmative representation.” Democracy & Society 1 (June), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Gender and Class in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, Gale. 2006. “Gender equity and rural land reform in China.” In Jaquette, and Summerfield, , Women and Gender Equity in Development Theory and Practice, pp. 137–58.
Sunstein, Cass. 1991. “Preferences and politics.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20/11, pp. 156–73.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002a. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002b. “Research on women in legislatures: what have we learned, where are we going?” Women & Politics 23/1–2, pp. 167–85.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002c. “Transforming the agenda: analyzing gender differences in women's issue bill sponsorship.” In Rosenthal, Cindy Simon (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Congressional Studies Series 4. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 260–83.Google Scholar
Sykes, Patricia. 2006. Personal conversation. July 11, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tamerius, K. 1995. “Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women.” In Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Kelly, R. (eds.), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M. 2005. “Women on the sidelines: women's representation on committees in Latin American legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49/2, pp. 420–36.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna Michelle. 2003. “Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test.” Women & Politics 24/4, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. “How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis.” In Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Calvin. 2002. “Refleshing the bright boys: or, how male bodies matter to feminist theory.” In Gardiner, Judith Kegan (ed.), Masculinity Studies and Feminist Theory: New Directions. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 60–89.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue, and Welch, Susan. 2001. “The impact of women in state legislatures: numerical and organizational strength.” In Carroll, Susan (ed.), The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 166–81.Google Scholar
Thomassen, Jacques 1994. “Empirical research into political representation: failing democracy or failing models?” In Jennings, M. Kent and Mann, Thomas E. (eds.) Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller. Anne Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 237–64.Google Scholar
Threlfall, Monica (ed.). 1996. Mapping the Women's Movement: Feminist Politics and Social Transformation in the North. London: Verso.
Tickner, Ann J. 2006. “Feminism meets international relations: some methodological issues.” In Ackerly, , Stern, , and True, , Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, pp. 19–41.
Tinker, Irene. 1976. “The adverse impact of development on women.” In Tinker, Irene and Bramsen, Michele Bo (eds.), Women and World Development. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Tinker, Irene (ed.). 1990. Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1958. Essays on “the Welfare State.”London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1968. Commitment to Welfare. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1974. Social Policy: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
TollesonRinehart, Sue Rinehart, Sue. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 1998. “Do female MPs substantively represent women? A study of legislative behaviour in Canada's 35th parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31/3, pp. 435–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, Linda. 1993. “A few good women: female legislators in Alberta, 1972–1991.” In Cavanaugh, Cathy and Warne, Randy (eds.), Standing on New Ground: Women in Alberta. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press, pp. 87–118.Google Scholar
Trimble, Linda. 1997. “Feminist policies in the Alberta legislature, 1972–1994.” In Arscott, Jane and Trimble, Linda (eds.), In the Presence of Women: Representation and Canadian Governments. Toronto: Harcourt Brace, pp. 128–54.Google Scholar
Trimble, Linda. 2000. “Who's represented? Gender and diversity in the Alberta legislature.” In Tremblay, Manon and Andrew, Caroline (eds.), Women and Political Representation in Canada. Women's Studies Series 2. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 257–289.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2000. “Rethinking difference: comparative perspectives from Africa.” Signs 25/3 (Spring), pp. 649–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. “The evolution of transnational feminisms: consensus, conflict, and new dynamics.” In Ferree, and Tripp, , Global Feminism, pp. 51–75.
True, Jacqui. 2003. “Mainstreaming gender in global public policy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 5/3, pp. 368–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2008, “Trade governance and gender mainstreaming in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum.” In Rai, and Waylen, , Global Governance, pp. 129–59.
True, Jacqui, and Mintrom, Michael (2001). “Transnational networks and policy diffusion: the case of gender mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,UN. 2006. “Directory of National Machineries for the Advancement of Women.” DAW – DESA. April.
,UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1990–2006. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,USAID. 1997. Strategic Plan. New York: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Uusitalo, Hannu. 1984. “Comparative research on the determinants of welfare states: the state of the art.” European Journal of Political Research 12, pp. 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ros, J. 1995. “‘Femocrat’, you said? What kind of bird is that?” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research, Bordeaux.
Vleuten, Anna. 2007. The Price of Gender Equality: Member States and Governance in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. “A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998.” Journal of Peace Research 37, pp. 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, Virginia, and Wieringa, Saskia (1998). “The triangles of empowerment: processes and actors in the making of public policy.” In Lycklama à Nijeholt, , Vargas, , and Wieringa, (eds.), Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, pp. 10–28.
Wacquant, Loic. 1995. “The comparative structure and experience of urban exclusion: “race”, class and space in Chicago and Paris.” In McFate, Katherine, Lawson, Roger, and Wilson, William Julius (eds.), Poverty Inequality and the Future of Social Policy. Russell Sage: New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 1997. Gender Transformations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia. 2005. “Comparative gender mainstreaming in a global era.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7/4, pp. 453–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Alice. 1983. In Search of Our Mother's Garden. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the politics of presence: women's representation in the Swedish riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23/1, pp. 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, Malcolm. 1989. “Patriarchy and viriarchy.” Sociology 23/2 (May), pp. 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Sophie (ed.). 1990. Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions:London: Verso.
Waylen, Georgina. 1994. “Women and democratization: conceptualizing gender relations in transition.” World Politics 46, pp. 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 1998. “Gender, feminism and the state: an overview.” In Randall, Vicky and Waylen, Georgina (eds.), Gender, Politics and the State. London: Routledge, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions: Women's Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2008. “Transforming global governance: challenges and opportunities.” In Rai, and Waylen, (eds.), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, pp. 254–75.
Weber, M. 1952. “The essentials of bureaucratic organization: an ideal-type construction.” In Merton, Robert K. (ed.) Reader in Bureaucracy. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (eds.). 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the US. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002a. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. 2002b. “Beyond bodies: institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64/4, pp. 1153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. 2006a. “Inclusion, solidarity and transnational social movements: the global movement against gender violence.” Perspectives on Politics, 4/1, pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. 2006b. “Women's movements, identity politics and policy impact: a study of policies on violence against women in the 50 US states.” Political Research Quarterly 59, pp. 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alex. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don. 1987. “Doing gender.” Gender & Society 1, pp. 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whip, Rosemary. 1991. “Representing women: Australian female parliamentarians on the horns of a dilemma.” Women & Politics 11/3, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Lois Duke. 1999. Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders?Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. 2007. “Masculism.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism, accessed June 3.
Wilensky, Harold L. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold L., and Lebeaux, Charles N.. 1965. Industrial Society and Social Welfare. New York: the Free Press. First published 1958.Google Scholar
Williams, Fiona. 1995. “Race, ethnicity, gender and class in welfare states” Social Politics127–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice, Trust and Memory: The Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Female legislators and the women's rights agenda.” In Rosenthal, Cindy Simon (ed.), Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 170–94.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1997a. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik Olin. 1997b. “Deferring group representation.” In Shapiro, Ian and Kymlicka, Will (eds.), Ethnicity and Group Rights. Nomos 39. New York: New York University Press: pp. 349–76.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as seriality: thinking about women as a social collective.” Signs 19, pp. 713–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersection Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford Series in Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. “Lived body vs. gender: reflections on social structure and subjectivity.” Ratio: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15/4 (December), pp. 410–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2005. “Lived body versus gender: reflections on social structure and subjectivity.” In Young, Iris Marion, On Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. 1996. “Culture, ideology, and strategic framing.” In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. (1994). Signifying Women: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zetterberg, Pär. 2008. “Gender quotas and political effectiveness. Women's experiences in Mexican state legislatures.” Representation. Special issue on the Substantive Representation of Women 44/2.Google Scholar
Zheng, Wang. 2005. “State feminism? Gender and socialist state formation in Maoist China.” Feminist Studies 31/3, pp. 519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, Maxine Baca, and Dill, Bonnie Thornton. 1996. “Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism.” Feminist Studies 22, pp. 321–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippell, Katrin. 2006. The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne. 2005. “How do women's rights norms become effective? An analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women and its domestic impact.” PhD dissertation, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Gary Goertz, University of Arizona, Amy G. Mazur, Washington State University
  • Book: Politics, Gender, and Concepts
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755910.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Gary Goertz, University of Arizona, Amy G. Mazur, Washington State University
  • Book: Politics, Gender, and Concepts
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755910.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Gary Goertz, University of Arizona, Amy G. Mazur, Washington State University
  • Book: Politics, Gender, and Concepts
  • Online publication: 06 July 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755910.013
Available formats
×