Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: July 2010

9 - Justice


Justice requires giving what is deserved. That in turn requires figuring out both what is deserved and who it is that deserves it. Here priority should be given to who it is that is deserving rather than what it is that is deserved. This is because the more there are who are deserving, other things being equal, the fewer good things each of them can deserve. Political philosophers have long recognised this priority when they are trying to determine what the human members of a particular society or state deserve; they have acknowledged that this question cannot be conclusively resolved without taking into account distant peoples and future generations as also deserving. Unfortunately, most political philosophers tend to stop there. Even environmentalists who argue for environmental justice and oppose the imposition of undeserved risks to health and wellbeing on people of colour usually start from an anthropocentric perspective; they do not take the next logical step of asking whether non-human living beings are also deserving. In this chapter, in a quest for a truly non-arbitary, non-question-begging conception of justice, I will ask that question and answer it in the affirmative. Having established that all individual living beings, as well as ecosystems, are deserving, I will go on to begin to establish what it is that they deserve.

The moral deservingness of all living beings

Most political philosophers, as I have indicated, are committed to anthropocentrism; they just assume without argument that all or only human beings are deserving or have moral status.

Callicott, Baird (1980). ‘Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair’, Environmental Ethics 2: 311–28.
Callicott, Baird (1989). In Defense of the Land Ethic. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Leopold, Aldo (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rolston, W. Holmes III (2001). ‘Enforcing Environmental Ethics: Civil Law and Natural Value’, in Sterba, James P. (ed.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 249–369.
Sagoff, Mark (1984). ‘Animal Liberation and Environmental Ethics: Bad Marriage, Quick Divorce’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 22. 2: 297–307.
Singer, Peter (1975). Animal Liberation. New York: New York Times Publication.
Sterba, James P. (1998). Justice for Here and Now. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sterba, James P. (2001). ‘Toward a Reconciliation on Social and Political Philosophy’, in Sterba, James P. (ed.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Taylor, Paul (1987). Respect for Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Warren, MaryAnn (1983). ‘The Rights of the Nonhuman World,’ in Elliot, Robert and Gare, Arran (eds.), Environmental Philosophy. University Park: Penn State University Press, 109–34.