Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: July 2010

4 - Feminism


Hybridity shifts the focus

Feminist thought and environmental thought, feminist and ecological movements, have both emerged in recent times to challenge dominant worldviews and to acknowledge major aspects of the world that have been ignored, excluded or denied. They have much in common, and I write as a feminist who is also an environmental activist. But feminism and environmentalism have also challenged one another and come into conflict. The main forum for fruitful dialogue between them has been the hybrid area of ecofeminism, which aims at developing ‘a feminism that is ecological and an ecology that is feminist’.

Feminist and ecofeminist thinkers have applied feminist analyses to problems in environmental philosophy and theory. These have added significantly to the choices about how to theorise environmental issues. Some theorists from the environmental side express special suspicion and distrust of the ‘hybrid’ loyalties they discern here, contrasting these with the supposedly purer and ‘ungendered’ loyalties of predominantly male and white environmental theorists who have dominated the field. Treating women's experience and theories as gendered, and dominant theories based on male experience as pure and ungendered, is the equivalent of seeing black as coloured or racially based but dominant theories based on white experience as neutral and pure, lacking in colour or racial bias.

Many ‘pure’ positions in environmental theory involve hybrid loyalties, which are the worse for being unexamined and unannounced – for example, unrevealed political loyalties, eurocentric and androcentric loyalties.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Adams, C. (1990). The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.
Beauvoir, S. (1965). The Second Sex. London: Foursquare Books.
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.
Benhabib, S., and Cornell, D. (1987). Feminism as Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love. London: Virago.
Brennan, T. (2000). Exhausting Modernity: Grounds for a New Economy. London: Routledge.
Dryzek, J. (1990a). ‘Green Reason: Communicative Ethics for the Biosphere’, Environmental Ethics 12: 195–210.
Dryzek, J. (l990b). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Hay, P. (2002). Main Currents of Environmental Thought. Sydney: UNSW University Press.
Jacobs, M. (1999). ‘Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept’, in Dobson, Andrew (ed.), Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–45.
King, Y. (1981). ‘Feminism and Revolt’, Heresies 4. 1: 12–26.
Lloyd, G. (1984). The Man of Reason. London: Methuen.
Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature. London: Wildwood House.
Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The Fate of Nature in Western Culture. New York: Routledge.
Midgley, M. (1983). Animals and Why They Matter. Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press.
Mies, M., and Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.
Okin, S. M. (1989). Gender, Justice and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
O'Neill, J. (2002). ‘Wilderness, Cultivation, and Appropriation’, Philosophy and Geography 5. 1: 35–50.
Pateman, C. (1989). ‘The Civic Culture: a Philosophic Critique’, in The Disorder of Women. Cambridge: Polity Press, 141–78.
Plumwood, V. (1991). ‘Nature, Self and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy and the Critique of Rationalism’, Hypatia 6. 1: 4–32.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2001). ‘Nature as Agency and the Prospects for a Progressive Naturalism’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 12. 4: 3–32.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2004). ‘Animals and Ecology: Towards a Better Integration’, in Sapontzis, S. (ed.), Food for Thought. New York: Prometheus Books, 344–58.
Ruether, R. (1975). New Woman, New Earth. Minneapolis: Seabury.
Singer, P. (1990). Animal Liberation, 2nd ed. New York: Avon Books.
Shiva, V. (1988). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.
Shiva, V. (ed.) (1994). Close to Home: Women Reconnect Ecology, Health and Development. London: Earthscan.
Spelman, E. (1988). The Inessential Woman. Boston, Mass.: Beacon.
Weston, A. (2004). ‘Multi-Centrism: A Manifesto’, Environmental Ethics 26. 1: 25–40.