Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:49:58.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Theory and practice: the revolution in political judgement

from Part I - The character of political judgement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2009

Richard Bourke
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Raymond Geuss
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction: enlightenment and revolution

The role of political judgement is a subject rich in confusion. The confusion is a product of antagonism. Distinct accounts of the relationship between political theory and practice reached a pitch of mutual antipathy during the aftermath of the French Revolution. Opposing philosophical positions became increasingly associated with rival political commitments as the experience of revolutionary turmoil deepened. A crucial matter in contention among competing political sects was the connection between enlightenment and politics itself. This question had been debated since the latter half of the seventeenth century in terms of the relationship between philosophy and government. How best to conceptualise this relationship was a matter of dispute giving rise to sharply divergent affiliations. Stipulating how judgement bridged the gap between theory and practice depended upon general assumptions about how philosophy should serve politics. Should it set out moral principles in terms of which existing political arrangements could be evaluated, or should it strive to predict the probable consequences of actions pursued under differing kinds of political system? The main advocates of the answers to these questions became ideologically polarised by the end of the eighteenth century. Divergence bred hostility; hostility brought confusion. The absence of current consensus on how political judgement should be understood is a product of this process of ideological struggle.

A twentieth-century historian turned philosopher once tried to erect a political theory on the assumption that any theory must subtract from the subtlety of practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Political Judgement
Essays for John Dunn
, pp. 73 - 110
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×