Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Part V - The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 231 - 287Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.) (1966–1988) Plotinus, The Enneads, 7 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. J. (2012) “Bergson’s Environmental Aesthetic,” Environmental Philosophy 9: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. (1903) An Introduction to Metaphysics, authorized trans. Hulme, T. E. [2nd ed., 1912] New York.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1911) Creative Evolution, authorized trans. Mitchell, A., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, H. (1935) The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., New York.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1946b) “La Pensée et le Mouvant,” translated as “Introduction” in Bergson (1946a), 9–106.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1946d) “The Life and Work of Ravaisson,” in Bergson (1946a), 261–300 [Appeared first in Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques 1904].Google Scholar
Bergson, H. (1959) Bergson et nous: Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, Actes du Xe congrès des sociétés de philosophie de langue française, num. spéc., 3.Google Scholar
Bréhier, É. (1949–1955) “Images plotiniennes, images bergsoniennes,” Les études bergsoniennes 2: 105–128 [repr. in Bréhier, Études de philosophie antique, Paris, 292–307].Google Scholar
de Belloy, C. (2014) Dieu comme soi-même. Connaissance de soi et connaissance de dieu selon Thomas d’Aquin: l’herméneutique d’Ambroise Gardeil, Paris.Google Scholar
de Belloy, C. (2016) La visite de Dieu: Essai sur les missions des personnes divines selon saint Thomas d’Aquin, Geneva.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1990) “Immanence and the Historical Components of Expression,” in Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M., New York, 169–186.Google Scholar
Duméry, H. (1948) La Philosophie de l’action: essai sur l’intellectualisme blondelien, Paris.Google Scholar
Duméry, H. (1964) The Problem of God in Philosophy of Religion: A Critical Examination of the Category of The Absolute and the Scheme of Transcendence, trans. Courtney, C., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Gandillac, M. de (1973) “Le Plotin de Bergson,” Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie, 23: 173–183 [repr. in J. Trouillard, et al., Études néoplatoniciennes, Neuchâtel 1973, 97–109]Google Scholar
Gilson, É. (1988) Letters of Étienne Gilson to Henri de Lubac, with commentary by de Lubac, H., trans. Hamilton, M.E., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (2001) La philosophie comme manière de vivre: Entretiens avec Jeanne Carlier et Arnold I. Davidson, Paris.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (1998) “From Metaphysics to History, from Exodus to Neoplatonism, from Scholasticism to Pluralism: the fate of Gilsonian Thomism in English-speaking North America,” Dionysius 16: 157–188.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2003) “Philosophy as Way of Life for Christians? Iamblichan and Porphyrian Reflections on Religion, Virtue, and Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas,” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 59: 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2006) One Hundred Years of Neoplatonism in France: A Brief Philosophical History, Leuven/Paris/Dudley, MA [published together with Levinas and the Greek Heritage, by J.-M. Narbonne].Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2008) “The Ineffable Immediately Incarnate: Interplay between 20th century French Neoplatonism and Heidegger,” Heidegger and Religion: from Neoplatonism to the Posthuman, Oxford University Research Archive: http://ora.ouls.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid%3A05c4da8d-d3f0-44c2-b29c-12f8392b00e9/.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2010) Recurrens in te unum: Neoplatonic Form and Content in Augustine’s Confessions,” in Cary, P., Doody, J., and Paffenroth, K. (eds.) Augustine and Philosophy, Augustine in Conversation: Tradition and Innovation, New York, 127–144.Google Scholar
Hankey, W. J. (2017) “The Conversion of God in Aquinas’ Summa theologiae: Being’s Trinitarian and Incarnational Self Disclosure,” Dionysius 35: 132–70.Google Scholar
Janicaud, Dominique (1969) Une généalogie du spiritualisme français. Aux sources du bergsonisme: Ravaisson et la métaphysique, La Haye.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1932b) Annexe V. “Sur un ouvrage du Père A. Gardeil,” in Maritain (1932a), 855–867.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1944c) “The Bergsonian Philosophy of Morality and Religion,” in Maritain (1944a), 74–100.Google Scholar
Maritain, J. (1944d) “The Natural Mystical Experience and the Void,” in Maritain (1944a), 225–255.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. (2008) “Jacques Maritain,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/maritain/ (accessed 19 November 2018).Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1961a) “Valeur critique de la mystique plotinienne,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 59/63: 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1961b) “The Logic of Attribution in Plotinus,” International Philosophical Quarterly 1: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trouillard, J. (1969) “Le néoplatonisme de Plotin à Damascios,” Histoire de la philosophie I, Encyclopédie de la Pléïade, Paris, 886–935.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014a) Raison et Mystique, Études néoplatoniciennes, ed. Goy, M., Paris.Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014b) “Procession néoplatonicienne et création judéo-chrétienne,” in Néoplatonisme, Mélanges offerts à Jean Trouillard, Fontenay-aux-Roses 1981 [repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 79–108].Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. (2014c) “Sagesse bergsonienne sagesse plotinienne,” Bergson et nous: Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, Actes du Xe congrès des sociétés de philosophie de langue française, 1959, numéro spécial. 307–10 [repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 155–158].Google Scholar
Trouillard, J. and Mossé-Bastide, R.-M. (2014) “Sources et histoire du bergonisme,” extrait de la discussion, Bergson et Nous, repr. in Trouillard (2014a), 159–162.Google Scholar
References
Adamson, P. (2002) The Arabic Plotinus: A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle, London.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. (2016) A History of Philosophy without any Gaps: Philosophy in the Islamic World, Oxford.Google Scholar
Adluri, V. (2014) “Plotinus and the Orient: aoristos duas,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 77–99.Google Scholar
Alexandrakis, A. (2002) “Does Modern Art Reflect Plotinus’ Notion of Beauty?,” in Baine Harris, R. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Contemporary Thought, Albany, NY, 231–242.Google Scholar
Aouad, M. (1989) “La Théologie d’Aristote et autres textes du Plotinus Arabus,” in Goulet, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, I, Paris, 541–590.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1957) “The Background of the Doctrine ‘That the intelligibles Are Not Outside Intellect,’” in Dodds, E. R. et al. (eds.) Les Sources de Plotin, Entretiens sur l’Antiquite Classique 5, Geneva, 393–425.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) (1967) The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Mediaeval Philosophy, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1976) “The Apprehension of Divinity in the Self and Cosmos in Plotinus,” in Baine Harris, R. (ed.) The Significance of Neoplatonism, Albany, NY, 187–198.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1977) “Form, Individual and Person in Plotinus,” Dionysius 1: 49–68.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1978) “Gnosis and Greek Philosophy,” in Aland, B. (ed.) Gnosis: Festschrift fur Hans Jonas, Göttingen, 87–124.Google Scholar
Aubry, G. (2007) “Conscience, pensée et connaissance de soi selon Plotin: le double héritage de l’Alcibiade et du Charmide,” Études platoniciennes 4: 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubry, G. (2014) “Metaphysics of Soul and Self in Plotinus,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 310–322.Google Scholar
Baine Harris, R. (ed.) (1982a) The Structure of Being: A Neoplatonic Approach, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Baine Harris, R. (ed.) (2001) Neoplatonism and Contemporary Thought, Parts I and II, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Barnes, T.D. (1976) “The Chronology of Plotinus’ Life,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 17, 65–70.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2014) “Aristotelian Commentary Tradition,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neooplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 106–114.Google Scholar
Bechtle, G. (2000) “The Question of Being and the Dating of the Anonymous Parmenides Commentary,” Ancient Philosophy 20: 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtle, G. (2012) “Categories and Conversion,” in Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D. (eds.) Religion and Philosophy in the Platonic and Neoplatonic Traditions: From Antiquity to the Early Medieval Period, Sankt Augustin, 107–120.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (2001) Das wahre Selbst: Studien zu Plotins Begriffes Geistes und des Einen, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (2002) “The Legacy of Neoplatonism in F. W. J. Schelling’s Thought,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10: 393–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1966) “Did Plotinus Believe in Ideas of lndividuals?,” Phronesis 11: 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (197l) Plotinus’ Psychology: His Doctrines of the Embodied Soul, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J. (1987) “Plotinus in the Light of Twenty Years’ Scholarship, 1951–1971,” in Haase, W. (ed.) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36, Berlin, 528–570.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. J. (1937) “The Chronology in Porphyry’s Vita Plotini,” Classical Philology 32, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bregman, J. (1990) “The Neoplatonic Revival in North America,” Hermathena 149: 99–119.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (1992) “Une edition d’Eustochius?” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D. et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, Paris, 65–76.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2000) “Entre physique et métaphysique: Le terme ogkos chez Plotin, dans ses rapports avec la matière et le corps,” in Fattal, M. (ed.) Études sur Plotin, Paris, 87–111.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2014) “Plotinus’ Style and Argument,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 126–144.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., Goulet Caze, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (1982–1992) Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin, 2 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Bussanich, J. (1988) The One and its Relation to Intellect in Plotinus: A Commentary on Selected Texts, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catana, L. (2013) “Changing Interpretations of Plotinus: The 18th-Century Introduction of the Concept of a ‘System’ of Philosophy,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 7: 50–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2002) Sostanza movimento analogia: Plotina critico di Aristotele, Naples.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, E. (eds.) (2009) Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cilento, V. (1961) “Mito e poesia nelle Enneadi di Plotino,” in Dodds, E. R. et al. (eds.) Les sources de Plotin, Vandoeuvres-Geneva, 245–310.Google Scholar
Cilento, V. (1963) “La radice metafisica della libertà nell’ antignosi Plotiniana,” La Parola del Passato 18: 94–122.Google Scholar
Cilento, V. (1971) “Stile e sentiment tragico nella filosofia di Plotino,” in Hadot, P. and Schuhl, P.-M. (eds.) Le Néoplatonisme, Paris, 37–43.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2011) “Animals in Classical and Late Antique Philosophy,” in Beauchamp, T. L. and Frey, R. G. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, Oxford, 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2016) Plotinus: Myth, Metaphor, and Philosophical Practice, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collette- Dučič, B. (2014) “Plotinus on Founding Freedom in VI 8 [39],” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 421–436.Google Scholar
Corrigan, J. M. (2012) American Metempsychosis: Emerson, Whitman, and the New Poetry, New York.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (1996a) Plotinus’ Theory of Matter-Evil and the Question of Substance: Plato, Aristotle, and Alexander of Aphrodisias, Leuven.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (1996b) “Essence and Existence in the Enneads,” in Gerson, L. P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2000) “Platonism and Gnosticism. The Anonymous Commentary on the Parmenides: Middle or Neoplatonic?” in Turner, J. D. and Majercik, R. A. (eds.) Gnosticism and Later Platonism, Atlanta, GA, 141–178.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2009) “Ecology’s Future Debt to Plotinus and Neoplatonism,” in Vassilopoulou, P. and Clark, S. R. L. (eds.) Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth, London, 250–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. (in press) Love, Friendship, Beauty and the Good: Plato, Aristotle, and the Later Tradition, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. and O’Cleirigh, P. (1987) “Plotinian scholarship from 1971 to 1986,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36: 571–623.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D. (eds. and trans.) (2017) Plotinus Ennead VI 8: On the Voluntary and on the Free Will of the One, Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. and Turner, J. D. (in press) “Plotinus and the Gnostics: the Peculiar Impact of the Tripartite Tractate and Later Works,” in Marsola, M. and Ferroni, L. (eds.) Estratégias anti-gnósticas nos escritos de Plotino, Sao Paulo.Google Scholar
Cox-Miller, P. (1983) Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man, Berkeley/London/Los Angeles.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2001) “Pseudo- ‘Theology of Aristotle,’ Chapter I: Structure and Composition,” Oriens 36: 78–112.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2006) “The Arabic Version of Enn. IV 7 (2) and its Greek Model,” in Montgomery, J. E. (ed.) Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy. From the Many to the One: Essays in Celebration of Richard M. Frank, Leuven/Paris/Dudley, MA, 128–155.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2007) “Deux traités plotiniens chez Eusèbe de Césarée,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists, Leiden, 63–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, C. (2010) “The Origins of lslamic Philosophy,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. 2, Cambridge, UK, 869–894.Google Scholar
D’Ancona, C. and Taylor, R. C. (2003) “Le Liber de Causis,” in Goulet, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, suppl., Paris, 599–647.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 BC to AD 220, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (in press) “Plotinus Orator.”Google Scholar
Dillon, J., Russell, D, and Gertz, S. (2012) Aeneas of Gaza, Theophrastus with Zacharias of Mytiline: Ammonius, ed. Sorabji, R., London.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Smith, A. (2012) The Enneads of Plotinus with Philosophical Commentaries, Las Vegas/New York/Zurich.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Clark, S. R. L. (2013) Towards the Noosphere: Futures Singular and Plural, Lydney, UK.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1928) “The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic ‘One,’” Classical Quarterly 22: 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1956) “Notes on Plotinus Enn III 8,” Studi italiani di filologia classica, 27–28: 108–113.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1960) “Tradition and Personal Achievement in the Philosophy of Plotinus,” Journal of Roman Studies 50: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. et al. (1960) Les sources de Plotin: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 5, Vandoeuvres-Geneva.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1938) “Review of Henry Études plotiniennes I”, in Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen 200: 526–539.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1964) “Review of P. Henry and H.-R. Schwyzer (eds.) Plotini Enneades,” Gnomon 36: 461–469.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1976) “Emanation: Ein unphilosophisches Wort im spätantiken Denken,” Platonica Minora, Munich, 70–88.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (2000) Neoplatonic Saints: The Lives of Plotinus and Proclus by Their Students, Liverpool.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasson, E. (2008) The Notion of That Which Depends on Us in Plotinus and its Background, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. (1988) Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferwerda, R. (1965) La signification des images et des métaphores dans la pensée de Plotin, Groningen.Google Scholar
Finan, T. and Twomey, V. (eds.) (1992) The Relationship between Neoplatonism and Christianity, Dublin.Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (ed. and trans.) (1995) Plotinus: Ennead III.6. On the Impassivity of the Bodiless, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (2006) “Platonism, Platonic Tradition,” in Borchert, D. M. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed., Detroit.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (ed. and trans.) (2017) Marsilio Ficino. Commentary on Plotinus, Volume 4: Ennead III, Part I, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (ed.) (1996) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (ed.) (2010) The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, 2 vols., Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. (2014) Oxford Bibliographies Online www.oxfordbibliographies.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/view/document/obo-9780195396577/obo-9780195396577-0177.xml?rskey=ZD1wPH&result=241Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1982) “Le système chronologique de la Vie de Plotin,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds). Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, Paris, 187–228.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (ed.) (1989–2017) Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, 7 vols., & 1 suppl., Paris.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (1992) “Le Plan de la Vita Plotini,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, II, Paris, 77–85.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (2007) “La conservation et la transmission des textes philosophiques gecs,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists, Leiden, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulet Cazé, M.-O. (1982a) “L’arrière-plan de la Vie de Plotin,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, I, Paris, 229–328.Google Scholar
Goulet Cazé, M.-O. (1982b) “L’édition d’ Eustochius,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, I, Paris, 289–294.Google Scholar
Goulet Cazé, M.-O. (1992) “Remarques sur l’Édition d’Eustochius,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin, II, Paris, 71–76.Google Scholar
Goulet Cazé, M.-O. (2007) “Deux Traités plotiniens chez Eusèbe de Césarée,” in D’Ancona, C. (ed.) The Libraries of the Neoplatonists, Leiden, 63–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grmek, M. D. (1992) “Les maladies et la mort de Plotin,” In Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin II, Paris: 335–353.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1974) “L’harmonie des philosophies de Plotin et d’Aristote selon Porphyre dans le commentaire de Dexippe sur les Categories,” in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Rome, 32–47. [English translation in R. Sorabji (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, London 1990, 125–140. Reprinted in P. Hadot, Plotin, Porphyre: Études neoplatoniciennes, Paris 1999].Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, trans. Chase, M., Malden, MA [French original 1981].Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1997) Plotinus or The Simplicity of Vision, trans. Chase, M., Chicago [French original 1963].Google Scholar
Hadot, P. and Schuhl, P. M. (eds.) (1971) Le Néoplatonisme: Actes du Colloque International du C.N.R.S., Royaumont, 9–13 Juin 1969, Paris.Google Scholar
Halfwassen, J. (2014) “The Metaphysics of the One,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S., The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 182–199.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (1931) “La liberté chez Plotin,” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie, 33: 50–79, 180–215, 318–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P. (1935) Recherches sur La Préparation Évangelique d’Eusèbe et L’Édition perdue des oeuvres de Plotin publiée par Eustochius, Paris.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (1937) “Vers la reconstruction de l’enseignement oral de Plotin,” Bulletin de l’Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Lettres, 23: 310–342.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (1938) Études plotiniennes, vol. 1: Les états du texte de Plotin, Brussels.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, P. (1953) “La dernière parole de Plotin,” Studi classici e orientali 2: 113–130.Google Scholar
Himmerich, W. (1959) Eudaimonia: die Lehre des Plotin von der Selbstverwirklichung des Menschen, Würzburg.Google Scholar
Hutton, S.( 2002) “The Cambridge Platonists,” in Nadler, S. (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford, 308–319. [ = S. Hutton, The Cambridge Platonists, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy].Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. (1988) “Some new Plotinian emendations,” Emerita, 56: 95–102 [eight passages from Enneads II, III, IV, and V].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalligas, P. (1991–2004) Porphyriou: Peri tou Plôtinou biou, and Plôtinou Enneas prôtē, Plôtinou Enneas deutera, Plôtinou Enneas tritē, Athens.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. (2001) “Traces of Longinus’ Library in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica,” Classical Quarterly 51: 584–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, G. E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, H. J. (1964) Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. (1936) “Un fragment perdu de la recension d’Eustochius des oeuvres de Plotin,” Revue d’histoire des religions 113: 207–218.Google Scholar
Kremer, K. (1965) “Das Warum der Schopfung: quia bonus vel/et quia voluit? Ein Beitrag zur Verhältnis von Neuplatonismus und Christentum an Hand des Prinzips Bonum est diffusivum sui,” in Flasch, K. (ed.) Parusia, Frankfurt am Main 241–264 [Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 26, 2: 994–1032].Google Scholar
Laurens, P. (2012) Marsile Ficin: Commentaire sur le Banquet de Platon. Commentarium in Convivium Platonis, De Amore, Paris.Google Scholar
Linguiti, A. (2007) “La materia dei corpi: sullo pseudoilomorfismo plotinian,” Quaestio 7: 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linguiti, A. (2014) “Physics and Metaphysics,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 396–420.Google Scholar
MacKenna, S. (1936) Journals and Letters, ed. Dodds, E. R., with a memoir by Dodds (pp. 1–89) and a preface by Padraic Colum (pp. xi–xvii), London and New York.Google Scholar
Majumdar, D. (2007) Plotinus on the Appearance of Time and the World of Sense: A Pantomime, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Mazur, Z. (2010) “Unio Magica, Part II: Plotinus, Theurgy, and the Question of Ritual,” Dionysius 22: 29–56.Google Scholar
McEvilley, T. (2002) The Structure of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies, New York.Google Scholar
McGroarty, K. (2006) Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead I 4, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narbonne, J.-M. (2014) “Matter and Evil in the Neoplatonic Tradition,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 231–244.Google Scholar
Narbonne, J. M., Achard, M., and Ferroni, L. (ed. and trans.) (2012) Plotin: Oeuvres Complètes. Introduction, Traité 1 (I 6), Paris.Google Scholar
Natorp, P. (2004) Plato’s Theory of Ideas: An Introduction to Idealism, ed. and trans. Politis, V., Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Nikulin, D. (2002) Matter, Imagination and Geometry: Ontology, Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Plotinus, Proclus and Descartes, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Nyvult, M. J. (2012) Aristotle and Plotinus on the Intellect: Monism and Dualism Revisited, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1971) “Plotinus on Evil: A Study of Matter and the Soul in Plotinus’ Conception of Human Evil,” in Hadot, P. and Schuhl, P.-M. (eds.) Le Néoplatonisme: Actes du Colloque International du C.N.R.S. Royaumont, 9–13 juin 1969, Paris, 113–46.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1982) “Comment écrivait Plotin? Étude sur la Vie de Plotin 8.1–4,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin I, Paris, 329–368.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2011–2012) “Plotinus on the Making of Matter: The Identity of Darkness Parts I-III,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5: 6–57; 5: 209–261; 6: 27–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, D. (1992) “Plotinus,” in Catalogus translationum et commentariorum: Medieval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries 7, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (1996) “The Hierarchical Ordering of Reality in Plotinus,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, D. (2003) Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pessin, S. (2013 ) Ibn Gabirol’s Theology of Desire: Matter and Method in Jewish Medieval Neoplatonism, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessin, S. (2014) “Islamic and Jewish Neoplatonisms,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 541–558.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (1980) The Prose Style of Plotinus: Rhetoric and Philosophy in the Enneads. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (2009) “Plotinus on the Generation of Matter,” International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3: 103–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puech, H.-C. (1960) “Plotin et les Gnostiques,” in Dodds, E. R. (ed.) Les Sources de Plotin: Entretiens Hardt 5, Vandoeuvres-Geneva, 161–174 [“Discussion,” pp. 175–190].Google Scholar
Rappe, S. (1996) “Self-Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Enneads,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 250–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappe, S. (2000) Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappe [Ahbel-Rappe], S. (2014) “Metaphysics: The origin of becoming and the resolution of ignorance,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 166–181.Google Scholar
Rasimus, T. (2010) “Porphyry and the Gnostics: Reassessing Pierre Hadot’s Thesis in Light of the Second- and Third-Century Sethian Treatises,” in Turner, J. D. and Corrigan, K. (eds.) Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage, Atlanta, GA, 81–110.Google Scholar
Remes, P. (2008a) “Inwardness and Infinity of Selfhood: From Plotinus to Augustinus,” in Remes, P. and Sihvola, J. (eds.) Ancient Philosophy of the Self, New York and Dordrecht,155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remes, P. and Sihvola, J. (eds.) (2008) Ancient Philosophy of the Self, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) (2014) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1981) “Basil’s ‘Neoplatonism,” Its Background and Nature,” in Fedwick, P. J. (ed.) Basil of Caesarea: Christian Humanist, Ascetic. A Sixteen-Hundredth Anniversary Symposium, Toronto, 137–220.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. (1992) “Pourquoi Porphyre a-t-il édité Plotin? Réponse provisoire,” in Brisson, L., Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Goulet, R., O’Brien, D., et al. (eds.) Porphyre, La vie de Plotin II, Paris, 31–64.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. (1996) “Florence 1492: The Reappearance of Plotinus,” Renaissance Quarterly, 49: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schniewind, A. (2003) L’ ethique du sage chez Plotin: le paradigme du spoudaios, Paris.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (1984) “Light and the Active Intellect in Alexander and Plotinus,” Hermes 112: 239–248.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (1987a) “Synousia, Synaesthesis, Synesis in Plotinus,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36: 677–699.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (1987b) “Ammonius Sacchas,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36: 493–526.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (1992) Form and Transformation: A Study in the Philosophy of Plotinus, Montreal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (2014) “From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Plotinus,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 293–309.Google Scholar
Schroeder, F. M. (2015) “Porphyry’s Life of Plotinus and Academic Power,” Dionysius 33: 145–178.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. (1937) “Der Plotin-Codex ‘Vindobonensis Phil. graec. 226’,” Rheinisches Museum, 86: 270–285.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. (1939) “Das Plotin-Excerpt im Codex Rossianus Graecus 986,” Rheinisches Museum, 88: 367–379.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. (1941) “Die pseudoaristotelische Theologie und die Plotin-Ausgabe des Porphyrios,” Rheinisches Museum, 90: 216–236.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. (1951) “Plotinos,” Paulys Realenzyklopadie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft 21: 471–592. [With supplementary notes in 1978 = Paulys Realenzyklopadie, Suppl. 15: 321–323, Munich].Google Scholar
Schwyzer, H.-R. (1960) “Bewusst und Unbewusst bei Plotin,” in Dodds, E. R., et al. (eds.) Les sources de Plotin, Entretiens Hardt 5, Vandoeuvres-Geneva, 341–390.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1987) “Alexander of Aphrodisias: Scholasticism and Innovation,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36: 1176–1243.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. (1995) Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, (2014) “Tracing the Untraceable: Plotinian Motifs in the Pseudo-Galenic De Spermate,” in Zamora, J. M. (ed.) Neoplatonic Questions, Berlin, 9–42.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1974) Porphyry’s Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition: A Study in Post-Plotinian Neoplatonism, The Hague.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2014) “The non-commentary tradition,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 115–125.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (ed.) (2004–2005) Four Hundred Years of Transition: The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook, vol. 1: Psychology; vol. 2: Physics; vol. 3: Logic and Metaphysics, vols. 1 and 3, Ithaca, NY; vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2006) Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death, Oxford.Google Scholar
Steel, C. (1978) The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus, Brussels.Google Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2000) “Le Principe du beau chez Plotin: Reflexions sur Enneas VI. 7.32 et 33,” Phronesis 45: 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2013) “When Virtue Bids Us Abandon Life (Ennead VI 8 [39] 6, 14–26),” Karfik, F. and Song, E. (eds.) Plato Revived: Essays on Ancient Platonism in Honour of Dominic J. O’Meara, Berlin, 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K. (eds.) (2007) Reading Ancient Texts. Volume I: Presocratics and Plato; Volume II: Aristotle and Neoplatonism. Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien, Leiden.Google Scholar
Strange, S. K. (1987) “Plotinus, Porphyry, and the Neoplatonic Interpretation of the Categories,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2. 36. 2, Berlin, 955–974.Google Scholar
Theiler, W. (1966) “Ammonius und Porphyrios,” in Porphyre, Entretiens Hardt 12, Vandoeuvres-Geneva, 87–123.Google Scholar
Thillet, P. (1971) “Indices porphyriens dans la Théologie d’Aristote,” in Hadot, P. and Schuhl, P.-M. (eds.) Le Néoplatonisme, Paris, 293–302.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. and Majercik, R. A. (eds.) (2000) Gnosticism and Later Platonism: Themes, Figures, and Texts, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. and Corrigan, K. (eds.) (2010) Plato’s Parmenides and its Heritage, 2 vols., Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Turner, J. D. (2014) “Plotinus and the Gnostics: opposed heirs of Plato,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 52–76.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, R. M. (2014) “The Gift of Hermes: The Neoplatonists on Language and Philosophy,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 251–265.Google Scholar
Van der Valk, M. (1956) “A few Observations on the Text of Plotinus,” Mnemosyne 9: 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilopoulou, P. (2014) “Plotinus’ Aesthetics: In Defense of the Lifelike,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 484–501.Google Scholar
Versluis, A. (2017) Platonic Mysticism: Contemplative Science, Philosophy, Literature, and Art, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. F. (1996) “Plotinus on the Nature of Physical Reality,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 130–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M. F. (2002) “Plotinus, Nature, and the Scientific Spirit,” in Wagner, M. F. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Nature, Albany, NY, 277–329.Google Scholar
Wallis, R. T. (1972) Neoplatonism. London [2nd ed. with foreword by Gerson, L. P. 1995].Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2006) Plotinus’ Cosmology: A Study of Ennead II.1 (40), Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2014) “Neoplatonism and Medicine,” in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, Abingdon and New York, 356–371.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. and Horn, C. (eds.) (2012) Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolters, A. W. (1982) “A Survey of Modern Scholarly Opinion on Plotinus and Indian Thought,” in Baine Harris, R. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Indian Thought, Albany, NY, 293–308.Google Scholar
Wurm, K. (1973) Substanz und Qualität. Ein Beitrag zur Interpretation der plotinischen Traktate VI. 1, 2 and 3, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (2013) “Does Plotinus Present a Philosophical Account of Creation?” Review of Metaphysics 67: 55–105.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, F. W. (1986) “The Origins of the so-called Theology of Aristotle,” in Kraye, J., Ryan, W. F., and Schmidt, C.-B. (eds.) Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages: The ‘Theology’ and Other Texts, London, 110–240.Google Scholar