Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:26:26.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Transforming Energy and Industry: Towards a Net-Zero Circular Economy for Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2021

Andy Haines  and
Howard Frumkin
Andy Haines
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Howard Frumkin
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

The industrial revolution, the rise of nation states, and the emergence of market societies represented a turning point in the history of human civilization – a Great Transformation, as memorably characterized by economic historian Karl Polanyi (1). Indeed, there are echoes of Polanyi’s phrase in the Great Acceleration, the vast upscaling of the human enterprise that has brought us up against planetary boundaries (2). We can assert, without hyperbole, that another civilizational transformation is now needed – a transformation in how energy and materials are used, in how humans co-exist with the natural world, and in the accompanying social and economic underpinnings of modern societies (3, 4).

Type
Chapter
Information
Planetary Health
Safeguarding Human Health and the Environment in the Anthropocene
 , pp. 234 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Polanyi, K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press; 1944.Google Scholar
Steffen, W, Broadgate, WJ, Deutsch, L, Gaffney, O, Ludwig, C. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review. 2015;2:81–98. doi: 10.1177/2053019614564785.Google Scholar
Görg, C, Plank, C, Wiedenhofer, D, et al. Scrutinizing the Great Acceleration: the Anthropocene and its analytic challenges for social-ecological transformations. The Anthropocene Review. 2019;7(1):42–61. doi: 10.1177/2053019619895034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberl, H, Fischer-Kowalski, M, Krausmann, F, Martinez-Alier, J, Winiwarter, V. A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation. Sustainable Development. 2011;19(1):1–14. doi: 10.1002/sd.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlon, JR, Bloodhart, B, Ballew, MT, et al. How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization. Frontiers in Communication. 2019;4(20). doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogelj, J, Forster, PM, Kriegler, E, Smith, CJ, Séférian, R. Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets. Nature. 2019;571(7765):335–42. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z.Google Scholar
Millar, RJ, Fuglestvedt, JS, Friedlingstein, P, et al. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nature Geoscience. 2017;10:741. doi: 10.1038/ngeo3031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlingstein, P, Jones, MW, O’Sullivan, M, et al. Global Carbon Budget 2019. Earth System Science Data. 2019;11(4):1783–838. doi: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019.Google Scholar
Clarke, L, Jiang, K, Akimoto, K, et al. Assessing transformation pathways. In Edenhofer, O, Pichs-Madruga, R, Sokona, Y, et al., editors. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 413–510.Google Scholar
Peters, GP, Andrew, RM, Canadell, JG, et al. Carbon dioxide emissions continue to grow amidst slowly emerging climate policies. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10(1):3–6. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0659-6.Google Scholar
McGlade, C, Ekins, P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature. 2015;517(7533):187–90. doi: 10.1038/nature14016.Google Scholar
UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2019. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2019. Available from www.unenvironment.org/emissionsgap.Google Scholar
Shearer, C, Myllyvirta, L, Yu, A, et al. Boom and Bust 2020: Tracking the Global Coal Plant Pipeline. San Francisco: Global Energy Monitor, Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air; 2020. Available from https://endcoal.org/2020/03/new-report-global-coal-power-under-development-declined-for-fourth-year-in-a-row/.Google Scholar
Redl, C, Hein, F, Buck, M, Graichen, P, Jones, D. The European Power Sector in 2019: Up-to-Date Analysis on the Electricity Transition. Berlin and Brussels: Agora Energiewende and Sandbag; 2020. Available from https://ember-climate.org/project/power-2019/.Google Scholar
Rocha, M, Yanguas Parra, P, Sferra, F, et al. A Stress Test for Coal in Europe under the Paris Agreement: Scientific Goalposts for a Coordinated Phaseout and Divestment. Berlin: Climate Analytics; 2017. Available from https://climateanalytics.org/publications/2017/stress-test-for-coal-in-the-eu/.Google Scholar
UNEP. Emissions Gap Report 2018. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2018.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. Short-term tests validate long-term estimates of climate change. Nature. 2020;582(7811):185–6. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01484-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, KD, Hewitt, AJ, Bodas-Salcedo, A. Use of short-range forecasts to evaluate fast physics processes relevant for climate sensitivity. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 2020;12(4):e2019MS001986. doi: 10.1029/2019MS001986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, D, Parry, I, Le, N-P, Shang, B. Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2019. Working Paper No. 19/89. Available from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/05/02/Global-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Remain-Large-An-Update-Based-on-Country-Level-Estimates-46509.Google Scholar
Coady, D, Parry, IWH, Sears, L, Shang, B. How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies? Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2015. Available from www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/How-Large-Are-Global-Energy-Subsidies-42940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, D, Parry, I, Sears, L, Shang, B. How large are global fossil fuel subsidies? World Development. 2017;91:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.004.Google Scholar
Watts, N, Amann, M, Arnell, N, et al. The 2019 report of the Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. The Lancet. 2019;394(10211):1836–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6.Google Scholar
UN DESA. Accelerating SDG7: Policy Briefs in Support of the First SDG7 Review at the UN High-Level Political Forum 2018. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2018. Available from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/18041SDG7_Policy_Brief.pdf.Google Scholar
Jewell, J, McCollum, D, Emmerling, J, et al. Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions. Nature. 2018;554(7691):229–33. doi: 10.1038/nature25467.Google Scholar
Gupta, V, Dhillon, R, Yates, R. Financing universal health coverage by cutting fossil fuel subsidies. The Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(6):e306–7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00007-8.Google Scholar
Borghesi, S, Montini, M. The best (and worst) of GHG emission trading systems: comparing the EU ETS with its followers. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2016;4(27). doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2016.00027.Google Scholar
World Bank. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2019. Available from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31755.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, JE, Stern, NH, Duan, M, et al. Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Washington, DC: Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition; 2017. Available from www.carbonpricingleadership.org/report-of-the-highlevel-commission-on-carbon-prices.Google Scholar
IPCC. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, et al., editors. Geneva: IPCC and WMO; 2018.Google Scholar
Le Bras, H. Cars, gilets jaunes, and the Rassemblement national. Études 2019;4:31–44. www.cairn-int.info/journal-etudes-2019-4-page-31.htm.Google Scholar
Salies, E. Gilets Jaunes: Is the Energy Transition Possible While Still Reducing Inequality? Paris: Observatoire français des conjonctures économiques (French Economic Observatory, OFCE); 2019. Available from www.ofce.sciences-po.fr/blog/gilets-jaunes-is-the-energy-transition-possible-while-still-reducing-inequality/.Google Scholar
Cuevas, S, Haines, A. Health benefits of a carbon tax. The Lancet. 2016;387(10013):7–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00994-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, NH. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramanathan, R, Molina, ML, Zaelke, D. Well Under 2 Degrees Celsius: Fast Action Policies to Protect People and the Planet from Extreme Climate Change. Paris: Climate & Clean Air Coalition; 2017. Available from www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/well-under-2-degrees-celsius-fast-action-policies-protect-people-and-planet-extreme.Google Scholar
Pacala, S, Socolow, R. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science. 2004;305(5686):968–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1100103.Google Scholar
Project Drawdown. The Drawdown Review 2020: Climate Solutions for a New Decade. San Francisco: Project Drawdown; 2020. Available from www.drawdown.org/drawdown-framework/drawdown-review-2020.Google Scholar
Hawken, P, editor. Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming. London and New York: Penguin; 2017.Google Scholar
Fuss, S, Canadell, JG, Peters, GP, et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4(10):850–3. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mander, S, Anderson, K, Larkin, A, Gough, C, Vaughan, N. The role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage in meeting the climate mitigation challenge: a whole system perspective. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:6036–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1739.Google Scholar
Consoli, C. Bioenergy and Carbon Capture and Storage: 2019 Perspective. Melbourne: Global CCS Institute; 2019. Available from www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/.Google Scholar
Galik, CS. A continuing need to revisit BECCS and its potential. Nature Climate Change. 2020;10(1):2–3. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0650-2.Google Scholar
Widger, P, Haddad, A. Evaluation of SF6 leakage from gas insulated equipment on electricity networks in Great Britain. Energies. 2018;11(8). doi: 10.3390/en11082037.Google Scholar
Energy Transitions Commission. Mission Possible: Reaching Net-Zero Carbon Emissions from Harder-to-Abate Sectors by Mid-Century. London: Energy Transitions Commission; 2018. Available from www.energy-transitions.org/mission-possible.Google Scholar
Lawrence, MG, Schäfer, S, Muri, H, et al. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):3734. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3.Google Scholar
Frumhoff, PC, Stephens, JC. Towards legitimacy of the solar geoengineering research enterprise. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2018;376(2119):20160459. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0459.Google Scholar
UCS. UCS Position on Solar Geoengineering. Boston: Union of Concerned Scientists; 2019. Available from www.ucsusa.org/resources/what-climate-engineering.Google Scholar
Waisman, H, Bataille, C, Winkler, H, et al. A pathway design framework for national low greenhouse gas emission development strategies. Nature Climate Change. 2019;9(4):261–8. doi: 10.1038/s41558-019-0442-8.Google Scholar
Haines, A, McMichael, AJ, Smith, KR, et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers. The Lancet. 2009;374(9707):2104–14. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61759-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, J, Kovats, S, Vardoulakis, S, et al. Public health co-benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reduction: a systematic review. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;627:388–402. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.193.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency. Energy and Air Pollution: World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2016. Available from www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-air-pollution.Google Scholar
Lelieveld, J, Klingmüller, K, Pozzer, A, et al. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(15):7192–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819989116.Google Scholar
Markandya, A, Sampedro, J, Smith, SJ, et al. Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2(3):e126–33. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9.Google Scholar
Thompson, TM, Rausch, S, Saari, RK, Selin, NE. A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4(10):917–23. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2342.Google Scholar
Lelieveld, J, Haines, A, Pozzer, A. Age-dependent health risk from ambient air pollution: a modelling and data analysis of childhood mortality in middle-income and low-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2(7):e292–300. doi: 10.1016/s2542-5196(18)30147-5.Google Scholar
Shindell, D, Kuylenstierna, JCI, Vignati, E, et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science. 2012;335(6065):183–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1210026.Google Scholar
Shindell, D, Borgford-Parnell, N, Brauer, M, et al. A climate policy pathway for near- and long-term benefits. Science. 2017;356(6337):493–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCubbin, D, Sovacool, BK. Quantifying the health and environmental benefits of wind power to natural gas. Energy Policy. 2013;53:429–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crichton, F, Petrie, KJ. Health complaints and wind turbines: the efficacy of explaining the nocebo response to reduce symptom reporting. Environmental Research. 2015;140:449–55. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.016.Google Scholar
Schmidt, JH, Klokker, M. Health effects related to wind turbine noise exposure: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hessler, DM, Hessler, GF. Recommended noise level design goals and limits at residential receptors for wind turbine developments in the United States. Noise Control Engineering Journal. 2011;59(1):94–104. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3531795.Google Scholar
Pohl, J, Gabriel, J, Hübner, G. Understanding stress effects of wind turbine noise: the integrated approach. Energy Policy. 2018;112:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhiyi, B, Labrèche, F, Zayed, J. The photovoltaic industry on the path to a sustainable future: environmental and occupational health issues. Environment International. 2014;73:224–34. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.023.Google Scholar
Schneider, M, Froggatt, A. The World Nuclear Industry: Status Report 2019. Mycle Schneider Consulting; 2019. Available from www.worldnuclearreport.org/-World-Nuclear-Industry-Status-Report-2019.Google Scholar
Smith, KR, Frumkin, H, Balakrishnan, K, et al. Energy and human health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2013;34:159–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarfl, C, Lumsdon, AE, Berlekamp, J, Tydecks, L, Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences. 2015;77(1):161–70. doi: 10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0.Google Scholar
Van Cappellen, P, Maavara, T. Rivers in the Anthropocene: global scale modifications of riverine nutrient fluxes by damming. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. 2016;16(2):106–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2016.04.001.Google Scholar
Maavara, T, Dürr, HH, Van Cappellen, P. Worldwide retention of nutrient silicon by river damming: from sparse data set to global estimate. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2014;28(8):842–55. doi:10.1002/2014GB004875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maavara, T, Parsons, CT, Ridenour, C, et al. Global phosphorus retention by river damming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112(51):15603–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511797112.Google Scholar
Maavara, T, Lauerwald, R, Regnier, P, Van Cappellen, P. Global perturbation of organic carbon cycling by river damming. Nature Communications. 2017;8:15347. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15347.Google Scholar
Wehrli, B. Climate science: renewable but not carbon-free. Nature Geoscience. 2011;4:585–6.Google Scholar
McDonald-Wilmsen, B, Webber, M. Dams and displacement: raising the standards and broadening the research agenda. Water Alternatives. 2010;3(2):142–61.Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Peng, L, Liu, W, et al. Response of primary vectors and related diseases to impoundment by the Three Gorges Dam. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2014;19(4):440–9. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12272.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Ribas, J, Parra-Henao, G, Guimaraes, AE. Impact of dams and irrigation schemes in Anopheline (Diptera: Culicidae) bionomics and malaria epidemiology. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2012;54(4):179–91. www.scielo.br/pdf/rimtsp/v54n4/a01v54n4.pdf.Google Scholar
Keiser, J, De Castro, MC, Maltese, MF, et al. Effect of irrigation and large dams on the burden of malaria on a global and regional scale. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2005;72(4):392–406. www.ajtmh.org/content/72/4/392.abstract.Google Scholar
Steinmann, P, Keiser, J, Bos, R, Tanner, M, Utzinger, J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2006;6(7):411–25. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(06)70521-7.Google Scholar
Kibret, S, Wilson, GG, Ryder, D, Tekie, H, Petros, B. The influence of dams on malaria transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecohealth. 2017;14(2):408–19. doi: 10.1007/s10393-015-1029-0.Google Scholar
Calder, RS, Schartup, AT, Li, M, et al. Future impacts of hydroelectric power development on methylmercury exposures of Canadian indigenous communities. Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;50(23):13115–22. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04447.Google Scholar
Endo, N, Eltahir, EAB. Prevention of malaria transmission around reservoirs: an observational and modelling study on the effect of wind direction and village location. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018;2(9):e406–13. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30175-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamududu, B, Killingtveit, A. Assessing climate change impacts on global hydropower. Energies. 2012;5(2). doi: 10.3390/en5020305.Google Scholar
GBD Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1923–94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32225-6.Google Scholar
Mortimer, K, Ndamala, CB, Naunje, AW, et al. A cleaner burning biomass-fuelled cookstove intervention to prevent pneumonia in children under 5 years old in rural Malawi (the Cooking and Pneumonia Study): a cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2017;389(10065):167–75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32507-7.Google Scholar
Smith, KR, McCracken, JP, Weber, MW, et al. Effect of reduction in household air pollution on childhood pneumonia in Guatemala (RESPIRE): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1717–26. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60921-5.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S, Dey, S, Guttikunda, S, et al. Indian annual ambient air quality standard is achievable by completely mitigating emissions from household sources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(22):10711–16. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900888116.Google Scholar
Dabadge, A, Sreenivas, A, Josey, A. What has the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana achieved so far? Economic & Political Weekly. 2018;53(20). www.epw.in/journal/2018/20/notes/what-has-pradhan-mantri-ujjwala-yojana-achieved-so-far.html.Google Scholar
Mani, S, Jain, A, Tripathi, S, Gould, CF. The drivers of sustained use of liquified petroleum gas in India. Nature Energy. 2020;5(6):450–7. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0596-7.Google Scholar
Singh, D, Pachauri, S, Zerriffi, H. Environmental payoffs of LPG cooking in India. Environmental Research Letters. 2017;12(11):115003. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa909d.Google Scholar
Lam, NL, Smith, KR, Gauthier, A, Bates, MN. Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B, Critical Reviews. 2012;15(6):396–432. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2012.710134.Google Scholar
Zhao, B, Zheng, H, Wang, S, et al. Change in household fuels dominates the decrease in PM2.5 exposure and premature mortality in China in 2005–2015. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018,115(49):12401–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812955115.Google Scholar
Fuller, GW, Tremper, AH, Baker, TD, Yttri, KE, Butterfield, D. Contribution of wood burning to PM10 in London. Atmospheric Environment. 2014;87:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.037.Google Scholar
Alcott, B. Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics. 2005;54(1):9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giampietro, M, Mayumi, K. Unraveling the complexity of the Jevons paradox: the link between innovation, efficiency, and sustainability. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2018;6(26). doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00026.Google Scholar
Sorrell, S. Jevons’ paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy. 2009;37(4):1456–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003.Google Scholar
Garrett, TJ. No way out? The double-bind in seeking global prosperity alongside mitigated climate change. Earth System Dynamics. 2012;3(1):1–17. doi: 10.5194/esd-3-1-2012.Google Scholar
Alfredsson, E, Bengtsson, M, Brown, HS, et al. Why achieving the Paris Agreement requires reduced overall consumption and production. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. 2018;14(1):1–5. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2018.1458815.Google Scholar
Ivanova, D, Stadler, K, Steen-Olsen, K, et al. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2016;20(3):526–36. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12371.Google Scholar
C40 Cities. The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5 °C World. London: C40 Cities, Arup and the University of Leeds; 2019. Available from www.c40.org/press_releases/new-research-shows-how-urban-consumption-drives-global-emissions.Google Scholar
Hubacek, K, Baiocchi, G, Feng, K, et al. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment. 2017;2(6):361–9. doi: 10.1007/s40974-017-0072-9.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. Contraction and Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: UIT Cambridge; 2000.Google Scholar
WHO. Circular Economy and Health: Opportunities and Risks. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2018. Available from www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/circular-economy-and-health-opportunities-and-risks-2018.Google Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Cowes, UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation; 2015. Available from www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards-a-circular-economy-business-rationale-for-an-accelerated-transition.Google Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Growth Within: A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe. Cowes, UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation; 2015. Available from www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/growth-within-a-circular-economy-vision-for-a-competitive-europe.Google Scholar
Czech, B, Daly, HE. In my opinion: the steady state economy – what it is, entails, and connotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2004;32(2):598–605. doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[598:IMOTSS]2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
Material Economics. The Circular Economy: A Powerful Force for Climate Mitigation. Stockholm: Material Economics Sverige AB; 2018. Available from https://materialeconomics.com/publications/the-circular-economy-a-powerful-force-for-climate-mitigation-1.Google Scholar
Allwood, JM, Cullen, JM. Sustainable Materials Without the Hot Air: Making Buildings, Vehicles and Products Efficiently and with Less New Material, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: UIT; 2015.Google Scholar
Stahel, WR. The circular economy. Nature. 2016;531(7595):435–8. doi: 10.1038/531435a.Google Scholar
D’Amato, D, Droste, N, Allen, B, et al. Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;168:716–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053.Google Scholar
Korhonen, J, Honkasalo, A, Seppälä, J. Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics. 2018;143:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041.Google Scholar
Landrigan, PJ, Fuller, R, Acosta, NJR, et al. The Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health. The Lancet. 2018;391:462–512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0.Google Scholar
Trasande, L, Zoeller, RT, Hass, U, et al. Estimating burden and disease costs of exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the European Union. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2015;100(4):1245–55. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4324.Google Scholar
DiGangi, J, Strakova, J. Toxic Toy or Toxic Waste: Recycling POPs into New Products. Gothenburg, Sweden: IPEN; 2015. Available from https://ipen.org/documents/toxic-toy-or-toxic-waste-recycling-pops-new-products.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J, Electris, C, Morris, J. More Jobs, Less Pollution: Growing the Recycling Economy in the U.S. Boston: Tellus Institute with Sound Resource Management; 2011.Google Scholar
IEA. Tracking Clean Energy Progress: Assessing Critical Energy Technologies for Global Clean Energy Transitions. 2020. Available from www.iea.org/topics/tracking-clean-energy-progress.Google Scholar
REN21. Renewables 2020 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21; 2020. Available from www.ren21.net/gsr-2020/.Google Scholar
REN21. Renewables 2019 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21; 2019. Available from www.ren21.net/reports/global-status-report/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×