Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:58:26.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Predicting future speciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Timothy G. Barraclough
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
T. Jonathan Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
Andrew Purvis
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
John L. Gittleman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Thomas Brooks
Affiliation:
Conservation International, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Humans are changing the environment in major ways. Vast areas of wild habitats have been converted to human land use or semi-natural habitat (Nepstad et al. 1999; Achard et al. 2002). Species are being transplanted beyond their natural ranges (Mooney & Hobbs 2000), maintained in artificially high abundance for human use, or driven to rarity or extinction by direct exploitation (Reynolds et al. 2001). Global climates are experiencing changes in temperature, precipitation, CO2 concentrations and many other aspects (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: www.ipcc.ch). Together these changes are having major effects on biodiversity (Sala et al. 2000; McCarty 2001; Parmesan & Yohe 2003). Concern normally focuses on rarity or loss of species. However, as well as affecting extinction rates, human activities are likely to have major effects on the future evolution of life on Earth: the future arena for evolution will differ in several key ways from that preceding human impact on the environment. Recently, Myers & Knoll (2001) argued that biodiversity research and management should place greater emphasis on the future of evolution, particularly on the possibility that human activities might inhibit speciation and thereby worsen the effects of current extinctions. But can we predict the future of speciation, and if so, should we manage it?

The task of predicting future speciation requires that we understand the processes that governed speciation leading to the present-day or past biota. However, general causes and trends of speciation are notoriously difficult to study owing to the long timescales of processes involved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J.et al. 2002 Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albertson, R. C., Markert, J. A., Danley, , , P. D. & Kocher, T. D. 1999 Phylogeny of a rapidly evolving clade: The cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 5107–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H. & Gillooly, J. F. 2002 Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science 297, 1545–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avise, J. C. 2000 Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bakker, F. T., Chatrou, L. W., Gravendeel, B. & Pelser, P. B. 2003 Plant species-level systematics: patterns, processes and new applications (Regnum Vegetabile 142). Königstein: KoeltzGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. G. & Sanderson, M. J. 1998 Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95, 9402–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, T. G., Hogan, J. E. & Vogler, A. P. 1999 Testing whether ecological factors promote cladogenesis in a group of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B266, 1061–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, T. G. & Nee, S. 2001 Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 391–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barraclough, T. G. & Vogler, A. P. 2002 Recent diversification rates in North American tiger beetles (genus: Cicindela). Molecular Biology and Evolution 19, 1706–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, T. G. & Vogler, A. P. 2000 Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. American Naturalist 155, 419–34Google ScholarPubMed
Benton, M. J. & Pearson, P. N. 2001 Speciation in the fossil record. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 405–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berlocher, S. H. 1998 Can sympatric speciation be proven from phylogenetic and biogeographic evidence? In Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H.), pp. 99–113. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. A. & Price, T. D. 2000 Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54, 2166–71Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. V. & Beerli, P. 2000 Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54, 1839–54Google ScholarPubMed
Erwin, D. H. 2001 Lessons from the past: biotic recoveries from mass extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5399–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fjeldsa, J. 1994 Geographical patterns for relict and young species of birds in Africa and South America and implications for conservation priorities. Biodiversity and Conservation 3, 207–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, P., Savolainen, V., Porteous, O.et al. 2002 Radiation in the Cape flora and the phylogeny of peacock irises Moraea (Iridaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25, 341–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. 2001 The Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Larget, B. & Swofford, D. 2000 A compound Poisson process for relaxing the molecular clock. Genetics 154, 1879–92Google ScholarPubMed
Jennings, S., Reynolds, J. D. & Mills, S. C. 1998 Life history correlates of responses to fisheries exploitation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B265, 333–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klicka, J. & Zink, R. M. 1997 The importance of recent ice ages in speciation: a failed paradigm. Science 277, 1666–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, L. L. 2001 Did the Pleistocene glaciations promote divergence? Tests of explicit refugial models in montane grasshoppers. Molecular Ecology 10, 691–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, T. & Iwasa, Y. 1995 Inferring the rates of branching and extinction from molecular phylogenies. Evolution 49, 694–704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losos, J. B. & Schluter, D. 2000 Analysis of an evolutionary species-area relationship. Nature 408, 847–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutz, W. & Ren, Q. 2002 Determinants of human population growth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B357, 1197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. & Scherbov, S. 2001 The end of world population growth. Nature 412, 543–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. 1963 Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, J. P. 2001 Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conservation Biology 15, 320–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. 2001 The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5446–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, H. A. & Hobbs, R. J. 2000 Invasive species in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
Moritz, C., Patton, J. L., Schneider, C. J. & Smith, T. B. 2000 Diversification of rainforest faunas: an integrated molecular approach. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 533–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. & Knoll, A. H. 2001 The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5389–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, S. 2001 On inferring speciation rates from phylogenies. Evolution 55, 661–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nee, S., Holmes, E. C., May, R. M. & Harvey, P. H. 1994a Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B344, 77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nee, S., May, R. M. & Harvey, P. H. 1994b The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B344, 305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepstad, D. C., Verissimo, A., Alencar, A.et al. 1999 Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398, 505–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, M. 1997 Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scripta 26, 331–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbi, S. R. 2001 Evolution – humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science 293, 1786–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, E. 1998 Detecting shifts in diversification rates without fossils. American Naturalist 152, 176–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. 2003 A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pybus, O. G. & Harvey, P. H. 2000 Testing macroevolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B267, 2267–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. D., Mace, G. M., Redford, K. H. & Robinson, J. G. (eds.) 2001 Conservation of Exploited Species. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ribera, I., Barraclough, T. G. & Vogler, A. P. 2001 The effect of habitat type on speciation rates and range movements in aquatic beetles: inferences from species-level phylogenies. Molecular Ecology 10, 721–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, J. E., Weitz, F. M., Fay, M. F.et al. 2001 Rapid and recent origin of species richness in the Cape flora of South Africa. Nature 412, 181–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H. 1997 Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 359–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. 1992 Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos 65, 514–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 1996 Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. L. 2001 Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5404–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, M. L. & Sponer, R. 2002 Evidence of a human-mediated invasion of the tropical western Atlantic by ‘the world's most common brittlestar.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B269, 1017–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J.et al. 2000 Biodiversity – global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanderson, M. J. 1997 A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 1218–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A. R., Robertson, R. J., Brisson, J. & Strasburg, J. 2001 Disrupting evolutionary processes: the effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5426–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorne, J. L., Kishino, H. & Painter, I. S. 1998 Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15, 1647–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilman, D. & Lehman, C. 2001 Human-caused environmental change: impacts on plant diversity and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5433–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A. B., Noack-Kunnmann, K. & Meyer, A. 2000 Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B267, 2133–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, D. S. 2001 Declines of biomes and biotas and the future of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5471–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Predicting future speciation
    • By Timothy G. Barraclough, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK, T. Jonathan Davies, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Predicting future speciation
    • By Timothy G. Barraclough, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK, T. Jonathan Davies, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Predicting future speciation
    • By Timothy G. Barraclough, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK, T. Jonathan Davies, Department of Biological Sciences and NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
  • Edited by Andrew Purvis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, John L. Gittleman, University of Virginia, Thomas Brooks, Conservation International, Washington DC
  • Book: Phylogeny and Conservation
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614927.018
Available formats
×