Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Phylogeny and conservation
- Part 1 Units and currencies
- Part 2 Inferring evolutionary processes
- Part 3 Effects of human processes
- 12 Conservation status and geographic distribution of avian evolutionary history
- 13 Correlates of extinction risk: phylogeny, biology, threat and scale
- 14 Mechanisms of extinction in birds: phylogeny, ecology and threats
- 15 Primate diversity patterns and their conservation in Amazonia
- 16 Predicting which species will become invasive: what's taxonomy got to do with it?
- Part 4 Prognosis
- Index
- References
13 - Correlates of extinction risk: phylogeny, biology, threat and scale
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 December 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- 1 Phylogeny and conservation
- Part 1 Units and currencies
- Part 2 Inferring evolutionary processes
- Part 3 Effects of human processes
- 12 Conservation status and geographic distribution of avian evolutionary history
- 13 Correlates of extinction risk: phylogeny, biology, threat and scale
- 14 Mechanisms of extinction in birds: phylogeny, ecology and threats
- 15 Primate diversity patterns and their conservation in Amazonia
- 16 Predicting which species will become invasive: what's taxonomy got to do with it?
- Part 4 Prognosis
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Around one quarter of mammalian species and one eighth of bird species are listed by IUCN as threatened with extinction (Hilton-Taylor 2000); the other species, however, seem not to be at so high a risk. Here, we present a simple scheme for investigating why some but not all species are at risk of extinction. We then assess the strength of phylogenetic signal – the extent to which close relatives are unusually similar – in traits that might predispose species to be at high risk. We find that the signal is so strong that any attempt to explore correlations between biology and risk must consider phylogeny: we outline some ways of doing so, with reference to published studies at a range of scales. We build on previous work in two ways. Firstly, earlier work has tested the correlation of extinction risk with either biological attributes or indices intended to reflect the intensity of threat faced by the species, but not both: we explore the effect of adding threat intensity measures to two previous analyses of biological risk correlates. Secondly, we explore the extent to which the outcomes of tests of hypotheses depend upon the scale of the study – global or local – and try to explain some apparent differences among them. We conclude by drawing attention to the multidimensional nature of threat patterns: correlates of risk can vary among clades, across scales, over time and with the nature of the threat.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Phylogeny and Conservation , pp. 295 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
& IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN
1996 Extinction filters and current resilience; the significance of past selection pressures for conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 193–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, & 1999 Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews 74, 143–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Comparative methods using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 6, 33–53Google Scholar
2003 Biological determinants of extinction risk: why are smaller species less vulnerable?Animal Conservation 6, 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 2001 Body size and risk of extinction in Australian mammals. Conservation Biology 15, 1435–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Gautier-Hion, A., Oates, J. F. & Onderdonk, D. A. 1999 African primate communities: Determinants of structure and threats to survival. In Primate Communities (ed. , & ), pp. 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Diamond, J. M. 1984 ‘Normal’ extinctions of isolated populations. In Extinctions (ed. ), pp. 191–246. Chicago: Chicago University Press
& 1999 Reptile extinctions on land-bridge islands: Life-history attributes and vulnerability to extinction. American Naturalist 153, 1–25Google Scholar
, & 2002 Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. American Naturalist 160, 712–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & 1992 Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41, 18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 1992 On comparing comparative methods. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 383–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 The phylogenetic regression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B326, 119–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, A. H. 1998 Ecological indicators of risk for primates, as judged by species' susceptibility to logging. In Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology (ed. ), pp. 56–79. New York: Oxford University Press
& 2002 Threatened primates experience high human densities: adding an index of threat to the IUCN Red List criteria. Biological Conservation 109, 137–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 2001 Primate evolution: a biology of Holocene extinction and survival on the Southeast Asian Sunda Shelf islands. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 114, 4–173.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
& 1991 The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
& 1996 ‘R’: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5, 299–314Google Scholar
& 1995 Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science 268, 389–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , & 2001a Short-term impacts of extreme environmental disturbance on the bats of Puerto Rico. Animal Conservation 4, 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & 2003 Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. American Naturalist 161, 601–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , & 2001b Correlates of extinction risk of birds from two Indonesian islands. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73, 65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. 1999 Convergence and divergence in primate social systems. In Primate Communities (ed. , & ), pp. 158–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, , et al. 2002 Linking evolution to conservation biology: a metric for exploring taxonomic patterns of risk. Conservation Biology 16, 1137–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 The development of new criteria for listing species on the IUCN Red List. Species 19, 16–22Google Scholar
1995 Classification of threatened species and its role in conservation planning. In Extinction Rates (ed. & ), pp. 197–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Mace, G. M. & Balmford, A. 2000 Patterns and processes in contemporary mammalian extinction. In Future Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity (ed. & ), pp. 27–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
& 1991 Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conservation Biology 5, 148–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000 Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. Journal of Theoretical Biology 202, 195–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1994 Estimating the rate of phenotypic evolution from comparative data. American Naturalist 144, 193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997 Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. American Naturalist 149, 646–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. M., Lawton, J. H. & Stork, N. E. 1995 Assessing extinction rates. In Extinction Rates (ed. & ), pp. 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press
1997 Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 Role of human population size in raising bird and mammal threat among nations. Animal Conservation 4, 45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 2000 Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 12144–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1999 Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1995 A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B348, 405–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2001 Mammalian life histories and responses of populations to exploitation. In Exploited Species (ed. , , & ), pp. 169–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, , & 2000a Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B267, 1947–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 1995 Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer Applications in Bioscience 11, 247–51Google ScholarPubMed
Rambaut, A. & Pagel, M. 2001 CONTINUOUS. University of Oxford
Ridley, M. & Grafen, A. 1996 How to study discrete comparative methods. In Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behaviour (ed. ), pp. 76–103. New York: Oxford University Press
, , et al. 2002 The Human Footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52, 891–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , et al. 2002 Hotspots and the conservation of evolutionary history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 2067–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , & 2000 Comparative analysis of correlates of Red Book status using European hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). Animal Conservation 3, 91–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& 1998 Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280, 2126–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 48
- Cited by