Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:56:41.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Hen harriers and red grouse: the ecology of a conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Simon Thirgood
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, UK
Steve Redpath
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Rosie Woodroffe
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Simon Thirgood
Affiliation:
Zoological Society, Frankfurt
Alan Rabinowitz
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

One of the most contentious conservation issues in the UK concerns the conflict between the conservation of hen harriers (Circus cyaneus) and commercial hunting of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus) (Thirgood and Redpath 1997; Thirgood et al. 2000a). Hen harriers are rare raptors in the UK and are of high conservation importance. Despite their legal protection, harriers and other raptors are killed on grouse moors because they are thought to have a negative impact on grouse-shooting. Grouse-shooting is an important land use in the uplands and benefits conservation because it retains heather moorland, a habitat of conservation significance in Europe. Shooting also generates income for landowners and is important in some rural economies. The conflict between raptor conservation and grouse management thus brings into opposition two powerful groups of stakeholders: ‘hunters’ who own much of the uplands; and ‘conservationists’ who attach value to birds, particularly raptors. The conflict is highly politicized and often the entry point to debates about land use and landownership. In this chapter, we review 10 years' work that has quantified the problem of raptor predation on grouse and tested management solutions. We begin by placing the harrier–grouse conflict into a wider context by assessing the conservation significance of heather moorland, grouse management and lethal control of raptors. We then examine the impact of raptor predation on grouse populations and grouse-shooting and go on to investigate potential solutions to the conflict.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×