Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:29:56.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Strengthening the biodiversity-related multilateral agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Charles Perrings
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

Identifying the biodiversity-related multilateral agreements

Nation states are not the only bodies capable of securing international environmental public goods, but they are still the most important. The standard approach to the provision of environmental public goods that span national boundaries is through multilateral agreements between nation states. The primary multilateral agreement for biodiversity change is the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). However, the CBD is only one among many multilateral agreements concerned with biodiversity change. There are several global agreements addressing different aspects of biodiversity conservation. Aside from the CBD these comprise the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (ITPGRFA), the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, and the UNESCO World Heritage Convention (WHC). All are associated through the Biodiversity Liaison Group.

But these agreements too are just the tip of the iceberg. The international environmental agreements database project lists 522 MEAs (plus 412 amendments and 196 protocols) signed in the last one hundred and fifty years, the earliest among them addressing the regulation of fisheries in the Rhine (1877) and the North Sea (1882, 1884), and measures to combat the phylloxera outbreak that devastated the vineyards of Europe in the late nineteenth century (1881, 1882). The list includes 255 agreements for the management of particular species or groups of species, 157 concerned with the conservation of flora and fauna, and 30 concerned with the conservation of landscapes, seascapes, and habitat (Mitchell, 2002–2012). Most of these agreements have been signed within the last fifty years, and nearly a third of all agreements, amendments, and protocols were signed during the 1990s (see Figure 13.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Our Uncommon Heritage
Biodiversity Change, Ecosystem Services, and Human Wellbeing
, pp. 398 - 435
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, S. (1994) The biodiversity supergame. Environmental and Resource Economics, 4, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2003) Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. (2007) Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrenfeld, M. J., O’Malley, R. T., Siegel, D. A., McClain, C. R., Sarmiento, J. L., Feldman, G. C., Milligan, A. J., Falkowski, P. G., Letelier, R. M. and Boss, E. S. (2006) Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature, 444, 752–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butchart, S., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., Baillie, J. E. M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K. E., Carr, G. M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A. M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N. C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., Galloway, J. N., Genovesi, P., Gregory, R. D., Hockings, M., Kapos, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Leverington, F., Loh, J., McGeoch, M. A., McRae, L., Minasyan, A., Morcillo, M. H., Oldfield, T. E. E., Pauly, D., Quader, S., Revenga, C., Sauer, J. R., Skolnik, B., Spear, D., Stanwell-Smith, D., Stuart, S. N., Symes, A., Tierney, M., Tyrrell, T. D., Vie, J.-C. and Watson, R. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Revised and updated strategic plan: technical rationale and suggested milestones and indicators. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Tenth meeting, Nagoya, Japan, October 18–29. CBD, Montreal.Google Scholar
Costello, C., Gaines, S. D. and Lynham, J. (2008) Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse?Science, 321, 1678–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denman, K. L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P. M., Dickinson, R. E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D., Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P. L., Wofsy, S. C. and Zhang, X. (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H. L.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dombrowsky, I. (2007) Conflict, Cooperation and Institutions in International Water Management: An Economic Analysis, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (2004) The State of World Fisheries and Agiculture. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (2008–2012) Regional Fishery Bodies (RFB). Available at (accessed 2012).
Food and Agriculture Organization (2010) The State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Golub, J. (1996) Sovereignty and subsidiarity in EU environmental policy. Political Studies, 44, 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, H. S. (1954) The economic theory of common-property resources. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvell, D., Aronson, R., Baron, N., Connell, J., Dobson, A., Ellner, S., Gerber, L., McCallum, H., Lafferty, K., McKay, B., Porter, J., Pascual, M., Smith, G., Sutherland, K. and Ward, J. (2004) The rising tide of ocean diseases: unsolved problems and research priorities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R., Orensanz, J. M. and Parma, A. M. (2005) Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of the London B: Biological Sciences, 360, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, T., Bellwood, D. R., Folke, C., Steneck, R. S. and Wilson, J. (2005) New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., Card, M., Connolly, S. R., Folke, C., Grosberg, R., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jackson, J. B. C., Kleypas, J., Lough, J. M., Marshall, P., Nystrom, M., Palumbi, S. R., Pandolfi, J. M., Rosen, B. and Roughgarden, J. (2003) Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301, 929–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J. B. C., Kirby, M. X., Berger, W. H., Bjorndal, K. A., Botsford, L. W., Bourque, B. J., Bradbury, R. H., Cooke, R., Erlandson, J., Estes, J. A., Hughes, T. P., Kidwell, S., Lange, C. B., Lenihan, H. S., Pandolfi, J. M., Peterson, C. H., Steneck, R. S., Tegner, M. J. and Warner, R. R. (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science, 293, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T. and Blasius, B. (2010) The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7, 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R. (2003) How to improve the provision of global public goods. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization (ed. Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K. and Mendoza, R.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kok, M. T. J., Tyler, S. R., Prins, A. G., Pintér, L., Baumüller, H., Bernstein, J., Tsioumani, E., Venema, H. D. and Grosshans, R. (2010) Prospects for Mainstreaming Ecosystem Goods and Services in International Policies. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.Google Scholar
Lewison, R. L., Crowder, L. B., Read, A. J. and Freeman, S. A. (2004) Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, G. M., Cramer, W., Diaz, S., Faith, D. P., Larigauderie, A., Le Prestre, P., Palmer, M. R., Perrings, C., Scholes, R. J., Walpole, M., Walther, B. A., Watson, J. E. and Mooney, H. (2010) Biodiversity targets after 2010. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M. and Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 10, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhi, Y., Roberts, J. T., Betts, R. A., Killeen, T. J., Li, W. and Nobre, C. A. (2008) Climate change, deforestation, and the fate of the Amazon. Science, 319, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R. B. (2003) International environmental agreements: a survey of their features, formation and effects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 429–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (2002–2012) International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2012.1). Available at (accessed 2012).
Mooney, H. A. and Mace, G. M. (2009) Biodiversity policy challenges. Science, 325, 1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, G. (2000) The UN Fish Stocks Agreement of 1995: history and problems of implementation. Marine Resource Economics, 15, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, G. (2008) Game theory and the development of resource management policy: the case of international fisheries. Environment and Development Economics, 14, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. and Sandler, T. (2009) The voluntary provision of a pure public good and the Montreal Protocol: behavioral and data concerns. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, J. C., Sandler, T. and Sargent, K. (1997) A tale of two collectives: sulphur versus nitrogen oxide emission reduction in Europe. Economica, 64, 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. A. and Worm, B. (2003) Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature, 423, 280–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normile, D. (2008) Rinderpest: driven to extinction. Science, 319, 1606–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D., Chirstensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T. J., Sumaila, U. R., Walters, C. J., Watson, R. and Zeller, D. (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature, 418, 689–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrault, A., Bennett, M., Burgiel, S., Delach, A. and Muffett, C. (2003) Invasive Species, Agriculture and Trade: Case Studies from the NAFTA Context. North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal.Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Mooney, H., Lonsdale, M. and Burgeil, S. (2010a) Globalization and invasive species: policy and management options. Bioinvasions and Globalization: Ecology, Economics, Management and Policy (ed. Perrings, C., Mooney, H. and Williamson, M.), pp. 235–250. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Burgiel, S., Lonsdale, W. M., Mooney, H. and Williamson, M. (2010b) International cooperation in the solution to trade-related invasive species risks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1195, 198–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F., Bunker, D. E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., Elmqvist, T., Ferrati, R., Fuhrman, J., Jaksic, F., Kawabata, Z., Kinzig, A., Mace, G. M., Milano, F., Mooney, H., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Tschirhart, J. and Weisser, W. (2010c) Ecosystem services for 2020. Science, 330, 323–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrings, C., Naeem, S., Ahrestani, F., Bunker, D. E., Burkill, P., Canziani, G., Elmqvist, T., Ferrati, R., Fuhrman, J., Jaksic, F., Kawabata, Z., Kinzig, A., Mace, G. M., Milano, F., Mooney, H., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Tschirhart, J. and Weisser, W. (2011) Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, C. R. (2004) Habitat loss confounds climate change impacts. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, E. J. and Kostadinova, T. (2005) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental agreements: the case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, T. (2004) Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, K. and Hempel, G. (2008) The UNEP Large Marine Ecosystem Report: a perspective on changing conditions in LMEs of the world’s Regional Seas. UNEP Regional Seas Report and Studies No. 182. UNEP, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U. R. (2012) Overfishing: call to split fisheries at home and abroad. Nature, 481, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatem, A. J., Rogers, D. J. and Hay, S. I. (2006a) Global transport networks and infectious disease spread. Advances in Parasitology, 62, 293–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatem, A. J., Hay, S. S. and Rogers, D. J. (2006b) Global traffic and disease vector dispersal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 6242–6247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tittensor, D. P., Worm, B. and Myers, R. A. (2006) Macroecological changes in exploited marine systems. Marine Macroecology (ed. Witman, J. D. and Roy, K.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Touza, J. and Perrings, C. (2011) Strategic behavior and the scope for unilateral provision of transboundary ecosystem services that are international environmental public goods. Strategic Behavior and the Environment, 1, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Sea Around Us Project (2012) Exclusive Economic Zones. Available at (accessed 2012).
United Nations (1993) Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations (2004) Oceans and the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary-General. Fifty-ninth session Item 51 a. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. (1996) Biological Invasions. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005) Global Economic Prospects. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1995) The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures CSPS Agreement. World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2005) International Health Regulations. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2012a) SPS Information Management System. Available at (accessed 2012).
World Health Organization (2012b) Relationship between WTO and MEA Rules. Available at (accessed 2012).
World Trade Organization Committee on the Environment (2011) Matrix on Trade-Related Measures Pursuant to Selected Multilateral Environment Agreements. WT/CTE/W/160/Rev. 5, TN/TE/S/5/Rev. 3. WTO, Geneva.Google Scholar
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotzke, H. K., Micehli, F., Palumbi, S. R., Sala, E., Selkoe, K. A., Stachowicz, J. J. and Watson, R. (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 314, 787–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Collie, J. S., Costello, C., Fogarty, M. J., Fulton, E. A., Hutchings, J. A., Jennings, S., Jensen, O. P., Lotzke, H. K., Mace, P. A., McClanahan, T. R., Minto, C., Palumbi, S. R., Parma, A. M., Ricard, D., Watson, R. and Zeller, D. (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science, 325, 578–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×