Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:26:51.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

35 - Organizations Dedicated to and Current Overview of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

from Section 5 - Safety, Standards, and Information Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

By
Bret D. Alvis ,
Adam B. King ,
Matthew D. McEvoy  and
Jesse M. Ehrenfeld
Edited by
Alan David Kaye ,
Richard D. Urman  and
Charles J. Fox, III
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Charles J. Fox, III
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University, Shreveport
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Operating Room Leadership and Perioperative Practice Management , pp. 333 - 340
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stone, AB, Grant, MC, Pio Roda, C, et al. Implementation costs of an enhanced recovery after surgery program in the United States: A financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experiences at a quaternary academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222: 219–25.Google Scholar
Ljungqvist, O, Scott, M, Fearon, KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A review. JAMA Surg 2017; 152: 292–8.Google Scholar
King, AB, Alvis, BD, McEvoy, MD. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, perioperative medicine, and the perioperative surgical home: Current state and future implications for education and training. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016; 29: 727–32.Google Scholar
King, AB, Geiger, T, Tiwari, V, Sandberg, WS, McEvoy, MD. Effect of ongoing process improvement on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway for colorectal surgery patients. San Diego, CA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015.Google Scholar
McEvoy, MD, Wanderer, JP, King, AB, et al. A perioperative consult service results in reduction in cost and length of stay for colorectal surgical patients: Evidence from a healthcare redesign project. Perioper Med 2016; 5: 3.Google Scholar
Vanounou, T, Pratt, W, Fischer, JE, Vollmer, CM, Jr., Callery, MP. Deviation-based cost modeling: A novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 570–9.Google Scholar
Tang, J, Humes, DJ, Gemmil, E, Welch, NT, Parsons, SL, Catton, JA. Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013; 95: 323–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reismann, M, Dingemann, J, Wolters, M, Laupichler, B, Suempelmann, R, Ure, BM. Fast-track concepts in routine pediatric surgery: A prospective study in 436 infants and children. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009; 394: 529–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, GA, Pisters, PW, Mansyur, C, et al. Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2000; 7: 484–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khreiss, W, Huebner, M, Cima, RR, et al. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 557–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, EP, Rosato, EL, Sauter, PK, et al. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution: The first step in multidisciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 917–23; discussion 23–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, EP, Grenda, TR, Sauter, PK, et al. Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 938–44.Google Scholar
Kalogera, E, Bakkum-Gamez, JN, Jankowski, CJ, et al. Enhanced recovery in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 319–28.Google Scholar
di Sebastiano, P, Festa, L, De Bonis, A, et al. A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: A prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 345–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daneshmand, S, Ahmadi, H, Schuckman, AK, et al. Enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 2014; 192: 50–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, S, Cross, A, Sakowska, M, Linscott, D, Woods, J. Effects of introducing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2013; 15: 294–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, RL, van Heijl, M, Bemelman, WA, et al. Initial experiences of an enhanced recovery protocol in esophageal surgery. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2372–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balzano, G, Zerbi, A, Braga, M, Rocchetti, S, Beneduce, AA, Di Carlo, V. Fast-track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1387–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarin, ALE, Naidu, R, Yost, CS, Varma, MG, Chen, LL. Successful implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program shortens length of stay and improves postoperative pain, and bowel and bladder function after colorectal surgery. BMC Anesthesiology 2016; 16: 55Google Scholar
Miller, TE, Thacker, JK, White, WD, et al. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 2014; 118: 1052–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, RW, Cleeland, CS, Wang, XS, et al. Patient-reported outcomes accurately measure the value of an enhanced recovery program in liver surgery. J Am Coll Surgeons 2015; 221: 1023.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, UO, Hausel, J, Thorell, A, et al. Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 571–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Group EC. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: Results from international registry. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 1153–9.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, UO, Oppelstrup, H, Thorell, A, Nygren, J, Ljungqvist, O. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is associated with 5-year survival after colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study. World J Surg 2016; 40: 1741–7.Google Scholar
Nelson, G, Kiyang, LN, Crumley, ET, et al. Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: The ERAS Alberta colorectal surgery experience. World J Surg 2016; 40: 1092–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, RH, Rea, KM, Turrentine, FE, et al. Standardization of care: Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surgeons 2015; 220: 986.Google Scholar
Savaridas, T, Serrano-Pedraza, I, Khan, SK, Martin, K, Malviya, A, Reed, MR. Reduced medium-term mortality following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty with an enhanced recovery program. A study of 4,500 consecutive procedures. Acta Orthop 2013; 84: 40–3.Google Scholar
Kehlet, H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 606–17.Google Scholar
Thiele, RH, Rea, KM, Turrentine, FE, et al. Standardization of care: Impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surgeons 2015; 220: 430–43.Google Scholar
Berwick, DM, Nolan, TW, Whittington, J. The triple aim: Care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27: 759–69.Google Scholar
Nygren, J, Thacker, J, Carli, F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 801–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amer, MA, Smith, MD, Herbison, GP, Plank, LD, McCall, JL. Network meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative carbohydrate loading on recovery after elective surgery. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 187–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anesthesiologists tASo. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 495–511.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, WC, Appel, PL, Kram, HB, Waxman, K, Lee, TS. Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988; 94: 1176–86.Google Scholar
Lassen, K, Soop, M, Nygren, J, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg-Chicago 2009; 144: 961–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melloul, E, Jubner, M, Scott, M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2065.Google Scholar
Dort, JC, Farwell, DG, Findlay, M, et al. Optimal perioperative care in major head and neck cancer surgery with free flap reconstruction: A consensus review and recommendations from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143: 292–303.Google Scholar
Fearon, KCH, Ljungqvist, O, Von Meyenfeldt, M, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466–77.Google Scholar
Kolarczyk, LM, Hance, LM, Bednar, P, Kim, HJ, Isaak, R. Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) clinical pathway using Lean Six Sigma principles: A framework for ongoing quality improvement. SDRP J Anesth Surg 2016; 1: 1.Google Scholar
Cerantola, Y, Valerio, M, Persson, B, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2013; 32: 879–87.Google Scholar
Feldheiser, A, Aziz, O, Baldini, G, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: Consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60: 289–334.Google Scholar
Thorell, A, MacCormick, AD, Awad, S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2016; 40: 2065–83.Google Scholar
Lassen, K, Coolsen, MM, Slim, K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, K, Nilsson, M, Slim, K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G, Altman, AD, Nick, A, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations—Part II. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140: 323–32.Google Scholar
Arsalani-Zadeh, R, ElFadl, D, Yassin, N, MacFie, J. Evidence-based review of enhancing postoperative recovery after breast surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 181–96.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×