Anton, J., and Yao, D.. 1994. “Expropriation and Inventions-Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights.” American Economic Review 84(1): 191–209.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research Conference. Series, The Rate and Direction of Economic Activities: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Besen, James, and Maskin, Eric. 2000, January. “Sequential Innovation, Patents and Imitation.” Working Paper no. 00–01. MIT.Google Scholar

Battacharya, S., D’Aspremont, C., and Gerard-Varet, L.-A.. 1998. “Knowledge as a Public Good: Efficient Sharing and Incentives for Development Effort.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 30: 389–404.Google Scholar

Calandrillo, Steve. 1998. “An Economic Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: Justifications and Problems of Exclusive Rights, Incentives to Generate Information, and the Alternative of a Government-Run Reward System.” Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal 9: 301–348.Google Scholar

Chang, H. 1995. “Patent Scope, Antitrust Policy, and Cumulative Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 26: 34–57.Google Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M., Nelson, Richard R. and Walsh, John P. (2000), “Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not),” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7552.Google Scholar

Cornelli, F., and Schankerman, Mark S.. 1999. “Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives.” RAND Journal of Economics 30(2).Google Scholar

Cremer, J., and McLean, R. P.. 1988. “Full Extraction of the Surplus in Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Auctions.” Econometrica 56(6): 1247–57.Google Scholar

De Laat, Eric A. A. 1996. “Patents or Prizes: Monopolistic R&D and Asymmetric Information.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 15(3): 369–90.Google Scholar

Denicolò, V. 1996. “Patent Races and Optimal Patent Breadth and Length.” Journal of Industrial Economics 44: 249–265.Google Scholar

Denicolò, V. 2000a. “Two Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy.” RAND Journal of Economics 31: 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denicolò, V. 2000b. “Combination of Competing Patents and Antitrust Policy.” Working paper. Department of Economics, University of Bologna.Google Scholar

Derry, T. K., and Williams, Trevor I. 1993. A Short History of Technology: From Earliest Times to A.D. 1900. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar

Eswaran, M. and Gallini, N.. 1996. “Patent Policy and the Direction of Technological Change,” RAND Journal of Economics 27(4): 722–746.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. 1995. “Arguments for Weaker Intellectual Property Protection in Network Industries.” In Kahin, Brian ed., Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure. 368–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gallini, N. T. 1984. “Deterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing.” American Economic Review 74: 931–41.Google Scholar

Gallini, N. T. 1992. “Patent Length and Breadth with Costly Imitation.” RAND Journal of Economics 44: 52–63.Google Scholar

Gallini, N., and Trebilcock, M.. 1998. “Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy – A Framework for the Analysis of Economic and Legal Issues.” In Anderson, R. and Gallini, N., eds., Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Industry Canada Research Series, University of Calgary Press: 17–64.Google Scholar

Gallini, N. T., and Winter, R.. 1985. “Licensing in the Theory of Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 16: 237–52.Google Scholar

Gandal, N., and Scotchmer, S.. 1993. “Coordinating Research through Research Joint Ventures.” Journal of Public Economics, 51: 173–93.Google Scholar

Gilbert, R., and Shapiro, C.. 1990. “Optimal Patent Length and Breadth.” RAND Journal of Economics 21: 106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, R., and Sunshine, G. C.. 1995. “Incorporating Dynamic Efficiency Concerns in Merger Analysis: The Use of Innovation Markets.” Antitrust Law Journal 63: 569–602.Google Scholar

Green, Jerry, and Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1995. “On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 26: 20–33.Google Scholar

Hall, B. H. and Ham Ziedonis, R.. 2001. “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995,” RAND Journal of Economics 32(1): 101–128.Google Scholar

Heller, Michael A., and Eisenberg, R. S.. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.” Science 280: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitch, E. W. 1977. “The Nature and Function of the Patent System.” Journal of Law and Economics 20: 265–90.Google Scholar

Klemperer, P. 1990. “How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?” RAND Journal of Economics 21: 113–30.Google Scholar

Kremer, Michael. 1989. “Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1137–67.Google Scholar

Kremer, Michael. 2000. “Creating Markets for New Vaccines.” Conference Paper, Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J.. 1986. “Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms.” Journal of Political Economy 94: 614–41.Google Scholar

Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J.. 1987. “Auctioning Incentive Contracts.” Journal of Political Economy 95: 921–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanjouw, J. 1998. “Patent Protection in the Shadow of Litigation: Simulation Estimations of Patent Value.” Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 65, 671–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemley, M. A. 1997. “The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property.” Texas Law Review 75: 989.Google Scholar

Loury, G. C. 1979. “Market Structure and Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93:395–410.Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz, and Penrose, Edith. 1950. “The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Economic History 10(1): 2.Google Scholar

Matutes, C., Regibeau, P., and Rockett, K. E.. 1996. “Optimal Patent Protection and the Diffusion of Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 27: 60–83.Google Scholar

Maurer, S. 1999. “Raw Knowledge: Protecting Technical Databases for Science & Industry.” Report commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences. www.nap.edu/html/proceedings_sci_tech/appC.htmlGoogle Scholar

Maurer, S. M., and Scotchmer, S.. 1998. “The Independent Invention Defense in Intellectual Property.” John M. Olin Working Paper no. 98–11. Boalt School of Law, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Maurer, S. M., and Scotchmer, S.. 1999. “Database Protection: Is it Broken and Should We Fix it?” Science 284: 1129–1130.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Nelson, Richard R.. 1998. “The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to the Current Debate.” Research Policy 27: 273–84.Google Scholar

Merges, R. P. 1998. “Antitrust Review of Patent Acquisitions: Property Rights, Firm Boundaries, and Organization.” In Anderson, Robert D. and Gallini, Nancy T., eds., Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar

Merges, R. P. 1999. “Intellectual Property Rights, Input Markets and the Value of Intangible Assets.” Working Paper. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Merges, R. P., and Nelson, R. R.. 1990. “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope.” Columbia Law Review 90(4): 839–916.Google Scholar

Minehart, D., and Scotchmer, S.. 1999. “Ex post Regret and the Decentralized Sharing of Information.” Games and Economic Behavior 27(1): 114–131.Google Scholar

National Research Council. 2000. The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

National Science Foundation. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. www.nsf.govIsbeIsrsIseind00Iframes.htmGoogle Scholar

Nordhaus, W. 1969. Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T. 1998. “A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation.” RAND Journal of Economics 29: 654–67.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S., and Thisse, J. F.. 1998. “Patent Breadth, Patent Length and the Pace of Technological Progress.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 7: 1–32.Google Scholar

Reynolds, T. 1983. Stronger than a Hundred Men: A History of the Vertical Water Wheel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Schankerman, M. 1998. “How Valuable is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field.” RAND Journal of Economics 29: 77–107.Google Scholar

Schankerman, M., and Scotchmer, S.. 2001. “Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Intellectual Property.” RAND Journal of Economics 32: 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy London: Unwin University Books.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S. 1991. “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law.” Symposium on Intellectual Property Law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scotchmer, S. 1996. “Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products Be Patentable?” RAND Journal of Economics 27: 322–31.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S. 1998. “R&D Joint Ventures and other Cooperative Arrangements.” In Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Anderson, R. and Gallini, N., eds. Industry Canada Research Series. University of Calgary Press: 203–22.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S. 1999a. “On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System.” RAND Journal of Economics 30, 181–196.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S. 1999b. “Delegating Effort in a Common Value Project.” IBER Working Paper no. E99–266. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, S., and Green, J. 1990. “Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law.” RAND Journal of Economics 21:131–46.Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. 2000. “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting.” Working Paper. Berkeley: University of California Competition Policy Center. Working Paper No. CPC00–11. Now published in Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 1, MIT Press, 2001. Adam B. Jaffe, Josh Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds.Google Scholar

Shavell, S., and van Ypserle, T. 1998. “Rewards versus Intellectual Property Rights.” Olin Discussion Paper no. 246. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Sobel, D. 1995. Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time. New York: Walker.Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission. 1995. U.S. Department of Justice-Federal Trade Commission Antitrust Guidelines for The Licensing of Intellectual Property.Google Scholar

Wright, B. 1983. “The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes and Research Contracts.” American Economic Review, 73, 691–70.Google Scholar