Rameez, MFM, Goonewardene, M. Uterine rupture. In Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S (eds), Obstetric and Intrapartum Emergencies: A Practical Guide to Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012, 52–8.Google Scholar

Turner, MJ. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16(1):69–79. DOI: 10.1053/beog.2001.0256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Al-Zirqi, I, Kjersti Daltveit, A, Forsén, L, Stray-Pedersen, B, Vangen, S. Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:165.e1-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45, October 2015. London: RCOG.Google Scholar

Cahill, AG, Stamilio, DM, Odibo, AO, Peipert, JF, Stevens, EJ, Macones, GA. Does a maximum dose of oxytocin affect risk for uterine rupture in candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:495.e1–5.Google Scholar

Nassar, N, Roberts, CL, Barratt, A, Bell, JC, Olive, EC, Peat, B. Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(2):163–71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00702.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Landon, MB, Spong, CY, Thom, E, Hauth, JC, Bloom, SL, Varner, MW, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:12–20.Google Scholar

Stamilio, DM, DeFranco, E, Paré, E, Odibo, AO, Peipert, JF, Allsworth, JE, Macones, GA. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Anesth Dig. 2008;28(2):91, DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000319805.82200.c5.Google Scholar

Di Spiezio, Sardo A, Saccone, G, McCurdy, R, Bujold, E, Bifulco, G, Berghella, V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):578–83. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17401.Google Scholar

Ofir, K, Sheiner, E, Levy, A, Katz, M, Mazor, M. Uterine rupture: risk factors and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1042–6. DOI: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)01052-4.Google Scholar

Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde Assistential. Assistance recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of obstetric hemorrhage. Brasília: OPAS; 2018.Google Scholar

Palacios-Jaraquemada, J, Fiorillo, A. Conservative approach in heavy postpartum hemorrhage associated with coagulopathy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(9):1222–5. DOI: 10.3109/00016349.2010.491524.Google Scholar

Larrea, NA, Metz, TD. Pregnancy after uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Breech Presentation. Green top guidelines No. 20b. London: RCOG; 2017.Google Scholar

Winter, C, Crofts, J, Laxton, C, Barnfield, S, Draycott, T. PROMPT Course Manual, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012, 179–91.Google Scholar

Bin, YS, Ford, JB, Nicholl, M, Roberts, C. Long-term childhood outcomes of breech presentation by intended mode of delivery: a population record linkage study. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2017;96(3):342–51.Google Scholar

Edmonds, K. Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 8th ed. Chichester: Blackwell Science; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson-Brown, S, Howell, C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016, 405–13.Google Scholar

Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, Willan, AR, Allen, AC, Armson, BA, et al. Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1295–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rzyska, E, Ajay, B, Chandraharan, E. Safety of vaginal delivery among dichorionic diamniotic twins over 10 years in a UK teaching hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136(1):98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azria, E, Le Meaux, JP, Khoshnood, B. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes for term breech fetuses with planned vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):285.e1-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goffinet, F, Carayol, M, Foidart, JM, Alexander, S, Uzan, S, Subtil, D, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):1002–11.Google Scholar

Fruscalzo, A, Londero, AP, Salvador, S, Bertozzi, S, Biasioli, A, Della Martina, M, et al. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(2):167–72.Google Scholar

Londero, AP, Salvador, S, Fruscalzo, A, et al. First trimester PAPP-A MoM values predictive for breech presentation at term of pregnancy. Gynaecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(5):503–7.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Caesarean Section Consent Advice No.7. London: RCOG; 2009.Google Scholar

Vistad, I, Klungsoyr, K, Albrechtsen, S, Skieldestad, F. Neonatal outcome of singleton breech deliveries in Norway from 1991 to 2011. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(9):997–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lin, MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynaecol Surv. 2006;61(4):269–77.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Umbilical Cord Prolapse. Green-top Guideline No. 50. London: RCOG, 2014.Google Scholar

Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland and the Clinical Strategy and Programmes Division, Health Service Executive. Clinical Practice Guideline Cord Prolapse. Guideline 35. 2015.Google Scholar

Gibbons, C, O’Herlihy, C, Murphy, JF. Umbilical cord prolapse: changing patterns and improved outcomes. BJOG. 2014;121:1705–9.Google Scholar

Johnson, KC, Daviss, BA. Outcomes of planned home birth with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ. 2005;330:1416–22.Google Scholar

Dilbaz, B, Ozturkoglu, E, Dilbaz, S, Ozturk, N, Akin Sivaslioglu, A, Haberal, A. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;274:104–7.Google Scholar

Ezra, Y, Strasberg, SR, Farine, D. Does cord presentation on ultrasound predict cord prolapse? Gynaecol Obstet Invest. 2003;56:6–9.Google Scholar

Kinugasa, M, Sato, T, Tamura, M, Suzuki, H, Miyazaki, Y, Imanaka, M. Antepartum detection of cord presentation by transvaginal ultrasonography for term breech presentation: potential prediction and prevention of cord prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(5):612–18.Google Scholar

Driscoll, JA, Sadan, O, Van Geideren, CJ, Holloway, GA. Cord prolapse: can we save more babies? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:594–5.Google Scholar

Sowter, M, Weaver, E, Beaves, M, eds. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training (PROMPT) Course Manual. Australian and New Zealand Edition. Melbourne Australia: PROMPT Maternity Foundation and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2014, 117–24.Google Scholar

Paterson-Brown, S, Howell, C, eds. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma – the MOET Course Manual, 3rd ed. London: Cambridge University Press; 2017, 233–7.Google Scholar

Department of Health, Government of South Australia. South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines: Cord Presentation and Prolapse, 2014.Google Scholar

McKeen, D, Geeorge, RB, Shukla, R. We ‘can do it’ does not mean we ‘should do it’: obesity, umbilical cord prolapse, and spinal anesthesia in the knee-chest position. Can J Anesthes. 2009;56:168–9.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. Green-top Guideline No. 44. London: RCOG, 2006.Google Scholar

Enakpene, CA, Odukogbe, AT, Morhason-Bello, IO, Omigbodun, AO, Arowojulu, AO. The influence of health-seeking behavior on the incidence and perinatal outcome of umbilical cord prolapse in Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2010;9(2):177–82.Google Scholar

Siassakos, D, Hasafa, Z, Sibanda, T, Fox, R, Donald, F, Winter, C, Draycott, T. Retrospective cohort study of diagnosis-delivery interval with umbilical cord prolapse: the effect of team training. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116:1089–96.Google Scholar

Beard, RW, Filshie, GM, Knight, CA, Roberts, GM. The significance of the changes in the continuous fetal heart rate in the first stage of labour. BJOG. 1971;78:865–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00198.x.Google Scholar

Curzen, P, Mclintock, DG, Patel, M. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby’s condition at birth. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289(November):1345–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alfirevic, Z, Devane, D, Gyte, GML, Cuthbert, A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(2). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.Google Scholar

Maternal Consortium. Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. 4th Annual Report. London; 1997.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E. Rational approach to electronic fetal monitoring during labour in ‘all’ resource settings. Sri Lanka J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(4):77–84. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/sljog.v32i4.3988.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Sabaratnam, A. Prevention of birth asphyxia: responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(4):609–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.02.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chandraharan, E. Fetal electrocardiograph (ST-analyser or STAN) for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: a friend or a foe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(1):123–7. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1276559.Google Scholar

INFANT Collaborative Group. Computerised interpretation of fetal heart rate during labour (INFANT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1719–29. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30568-8.Google Scholar

Nunes, I, Ayres-de-Campos, D, Ugwumadu, A; Fetal Monitoring and Alert (FM-ALERT) Study Group. Central fetal monitoring with and without computer analysis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):83–90. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799.Google Scholar

Gracia-Perez-Bonfils, A, Chandraharan, E. Fetal oxygenation. In Chandraharan, E (ed.), Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Evans, A, Krueger, D, Pereira, S, Skivens, S, et al. Intrapartum fetal monitoring guideline. 2018. https://physiological-ctg.com/guideline/guideline.html.Google Scholar

Ayres-de-Campos, D, Spong, CY, Chandraharan, E. FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.Google Scholar

Gracia-Perez-Bonfils, A, Vigneswaran, K, Cuadras, D, Chandraharan, E. Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;13:1–9. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1686475.Google Scholar

Yanamandra, N, Chandraharan, E. Saltatory and sinusoidal fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns and significance of FHR ‘overshoots. Curr Womens Health Rev. 2013;9:175–82.Google Scholar

Preti, M, Chandraharan, E. Importance of fetal heart rate cycling during the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG). 2018. www.ologypress.com/submit-article.Google Scholar

Gracia-Perez-Bonfils, A, Chandraharan, E. Physiology of fetal heart rate control and types of intrapartum hypoxia. In Chandraharan, E (ed), Handbook of CTG Interpretation. From Patterns to Physiology, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017, 13–25.Google Scholar

Ayres-De-Campos, D, Spong, CY, Chandraharan, E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.Google Scholar

Peebles, DM, Spencer, JA, Edwards, AD, Wyatt, JS, Reynolds, EO, Cope, M DD. Relation between frequency of uterine contractions and human fetal cerebral oxygen saturation studied during labour by near infrared spectroscopy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(1):44–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pereira, S, Chandraharan, E. Recognition of chronic hypoxia and pre-existing foetal injury on the cardiotocograph (CTG): urgent need to think beyond the guidelines. Porto Biomed J. 2017;2(4):124–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.01.004.Google Scholar

Xie, W, Archer, A, Li, C, Cui, H, Chandraharan, E. Fetal heart rate changes observed on the CTG trace during instrumental vaginal delivery. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1373084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Female pelvis and details of operative delivery; shoulder dystocia and episiotomy. In Arulkumaran, S, Penna, LK, Basker, R (eds), Management of Labour. Orient Longman (India), 2005.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Shoulder Dystocia. Green-top Guideline No. 42. London: RCOG, 2005.Google Scholar

Draycott, T, Winter, C, Crofts, J, Barnfield, S (eds). PROMPT. Practical Obstetric Multiprofessional Training: Course Manual. London: RCOG, 2008.Google Scholar

Poujade, O, Azria, E, Ceccaldi, PF, Davitian, C, Khater, C, Chatel, P, et al. Prevention of shoulder dystocia: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate an obstetric manoeuvre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;227:52–9.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy, Management. Green-top Guideline No 51. London: RCOG, 2008.Google Scholar

Chudleigh, T, Thilaganathan, B (eds). Obstetrics Ultrasound: How, When and Why. Edinburgh: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone, 2004.Google Scholar

Howell, C, Grady, K, Cox, C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma: The MOET Course Manual, 2nd ed. London: RCOG, 2007.Google Scholar

Webster, SNE, Loughney, AD. Internal podalic version and breech extraction. Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;13:7–14.Google Scholar

Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, Willan, AR, Allen, AC, Armson, BA, et al.; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1295–305.Google Scholar

Korb, D, Deneux-Tharaux, C, Seco, A, Goffinet, F, Schmitz, T; JUmeaux MODe dʼAccouchement (JUMODA) study group and the Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique et Gynécologie (GROG). Risk of severe acute maternal morbidity according to planned mode of delivery in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):647–55.Google Scholar

Shinar, S, Agrawal, S, Hasan, H, Berger, H. Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies after a previous cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Birth. 2019;46:550–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12434Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 17: Operative Vaginal Delivery. Washington, DC: ACOG, 2000.Google Scholar

Howell, C, Grady, K, Cox, C. Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma: The MOET Course Manual, 2nd ed. London: RCOG, 2007.Google Scholar

Baskett, TF, Calder, AA, Arulkumaran, S. Assisted vaginal delivery. In Munro Kerr’s Operative Obstetrics, 11th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2007, 91–125.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Operative delivery, shoulder dystocia and episiotomy. In Arulkumaran, S, Penna, LK, Bhasker Rao, K (eds), The Management of Labour, 2nd ed. Orient Longman (India); 2006, 137–62.Google Scholar

Ramphul, M, Ooi, PV, Burke, G, Kennelly, MM, Said, SAT, Montgomery, AA, et al. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG. 2014;121:1029–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baskett, TF, Arulkumaran, S (eds). Assisted vaginal delivery. In Intrapartum Care for the MRCOG and Beyond. London: RCOG; 2002, 63–74.Google Scholar

Ameh, C, Weeks, A. The role of instrumental vaginal delivery in low resource settings. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(Suppl. 1):22–5.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top Guideline No. 26. London: RCOG; 2011.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of Urgency of CS: A Continuum of Risk. RCOG Good Practice Guideline Number 11; 2010. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/goodpractice11classificationofurgency.pdfGoogle Scholar

Betran, AP, Torloni, M, Zhang, J, et al. WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–70.Google Scholar

Betran, AP, Torloni, M, Zhang, J, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;21;12–57.Google Scholar

Macfarlan, A, Blondel, B, Mohangoo, A, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2016;123(4):559–68.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Caesarean Section Consent Advice number 7. London: RCOG; 2009. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/consent-advice/ca7-15072010.pdfGoogle Scholar

Thomas, J, Paranjothy, S. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. RCOG Press; 2001. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/research–audit/nscs_audit.pdfGoogle Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Obtaining Valid Consent. Clinical Governance Advice No 6. London: RCOG; 2015. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/clinical-governance-advice/cga6.pdfGoogle Scholar

Baskett, TF. Preparedness for emergency ‘crash’ caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(12):1116–17.Google Scholar

SGOC Clinical Practice Guideline. Surgical safety checklist in obstetrics and gynaecology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;35(1 eSuppl B):S1–S5. https://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/JOGC-Jan2013-CPG286-ENG-Online.pdfGoogle Scholar

National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. London: RCOG Press; 2011. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132/evidence/full-guideline-pdf–184810861Google Scholar

Jeejeebhoy, FM, Zelop, CM, Lipman, S, et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a scientific statement from the AHA. Circulation. 2015;132:1747–73. www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/cir.0000000000000300Google Scholar

Abalos, E. Surgical techniques for caesarean section: RHL commentary. The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar

WHO recommendation on routine antibiotic prophylaxis for women undergoing elective or emergency caesarean section (September 2015). The WHO Reproductive Health Library. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episodes Statistics, Maternity Data 2009–10. www.hesonline.nhs.ukGoogle Scholar

van Ham, M, van Dongen, PWJ, Mulder, J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;74(1):1–6.Google Scholar

Bragg, F, Cromwell, DA, Edozien, LC, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. Br Med J. 2010;341:c5065.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Acute tocolysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:151–6.Google Scholar

Mishra, N, Chandraharan, E. Postpartum haemorrhage. In Warren, R, Arulkumaran, S (eds.), Best Practice in Labour and Delivery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008, 160–70.Google Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Arulkumaran, S. Surgical aspects of postpartum haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(6):1089–102.Google Scholar

Kaluarachchi, A, Krishnamurthy, S. Post-cesarean section splenic rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):230–2.Google Scholar

Celik, S, Celik, H, Soyer Calıskan, C, Tosun, M, Hatirnaz, S. Bladder filling before accreta surgery is a very effective method for preventing bladder injury: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019:1–6.Google Scholar

Abu-Ghazza, O, Hayes, K, Chandraharan, E, Belli, AM. Gynaecology: diagnosis and treatment. Obstetric Gynaecol. 2010;12:87–93.Google Scholar

Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to make Motherhood Safer – 2006–2008. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118(Suppl. 1):1–208.Google Scholar

Franchi, M, Raffaelli, R, Baggio, S, Scollo, M, Garzon, S, Laganà, AS, Casarin, J, Zanconato, G, Cromi, A, Ghezzi, F. Unintentional transvesical caesarean section: incidence, risk factors, surgical technique and post-operative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;236:26–31.Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics. Birth Characteristics in England and Wales – www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2016Google Scholar

NICE. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. Guidance and Guidelines. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG190Google Scholar

NPEU. Birthplace in England Research Programme. www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/birthplaceGoogle Scholar

Blix, E, Huitfeldt, AS, Øian, P, Straume, B, Kumle, M. Outcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: a retrospective cohort study. Sex Reprod Healthcare. 2012;3(4):147–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2012.10.001Google Scholar

National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving outcomes of maternity services in England: A five year forward view for maternity care. 2015. www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdfGoogle Scholar

Knight, M. The findings of the MBRRACE-UK confidential enquiry into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2018.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandraharan, E, Krishna, A. Diagnosis and management of postpartum haemorrhage. BMJ. 2017;358:j3875. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3875. PMID: 28954732.Google ScholarPubMed

Al-Zirqi, I, Vangen, S, Forsen, L, Stray-Pedersen, B. Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage. 2008;115(10):1265–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471–0528.2008.01859.xGoogle Scholar

McDonald, SJ. Prophylactic ergometrine-oxytocin versus oxytocin for the third stage of labour. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000201.pub2Google Scholar

Crofts, JF, Fox, R, Ellis, D, Winter, C, Hinshaw, K, Draycott, TJ. Observations from 450 shoulder dystocia simulations. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):906–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181865f55Google Scholar

Mehta, SH, Sokol, RJ. Shoulder dystocia: risk factors, predictability, and preventability. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(4):189–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2014.04.003Google Scholar

Leung, T, Stuart, O, Sahota, D, Suen, S, Lau, T, Lao, T. Head-to-body delivery interval and risk of fetal acidosis and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in shoulder dystocia: a retrospective review. 2011;118(4):474–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471–0528.2010.02834.xGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, MK, Bailit, JL, Branch, DW, Burkman, RT, Van Veldhusien, P, Lu, L, et al. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Anesth Dig. 2012;32(2):119–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000414102.87385.4Google Scholar

Draycott, T, Sanders, C, Crofts, J, Lloyd, J. A template for reviewing the strength of evidence for obstetric brachial plexus injury in clinical negligence claims. Clin Risk. 2008;14(3):96–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/cr.2008.080020Google Scholar

NICE. Intrapartum Care. Guidance and Guidelines. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs105Google Scholar

Sagi-Dain, L, Sagi, S. The role of episiotomy in prevention and management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015;70(5):354–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000000179Google Scholar

Reitter, A, Daviss, B-A, Bisits, A, Schollenberger, A, Vogl, T, Herrmann, E, et al. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman’s pelvis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(6):662.e1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.029Google Scholar

Payne, J, Cox, J. Prolapsed cord. 2015. https://patient.info/doctor/prolapsed-cordGoogle Scholar

Chebsey, C, Siassakos, D, Draycott, T. A review of umbilical cord prolapse and the influence of training on management. Fet. Matern. Med. Rev. 2012;23(02):120–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0965539512000058Google Scholar

Sayed Ahmed, W, Hamdy, M. Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. IJWH. 2019;10:459–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s130879Google Scholar

Soar, J, Deakin, CD, Nolan, JP, Abbas, G, Alfonzo, A, Handley, AJ, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Resuscitation. 2005;67:S135–S170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.004Google Scholar

Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, Hodnett, ED, Saigal, S, Willan, AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walker, S, Parker, P, Scamell, M. Expertise in physiological breech birth: a mixed-methods study. Birth. 2018;45(2):202–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/birt.12326Google Scholar

Impey, LWM, Murphy, DJ, Griffiths, M, Penna, LK on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation. BJOG. 2017;124:e151–e177. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.14465Google Scholar

Louwen, F, Daviss, B-A, Johnson, KC, Reitter, A. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;136(2):151–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisits, A. There is a place in current obstetric practice for planned vaginal breech birth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(3):372–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12643Google Scholar

Winter, C. PROMPT Course Manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Walker, S, Scamell, M, Parker, P. Deliberate acquisition of competence in physiological breech birth: a grounded theory study. Women Birth. 2018;31(3):e170–e177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.008Google Scholar

Walker, S, Scamell, M, Parker, P. Principles of physiological breech birth practice: a Delphi study. Midwifery. 2016;43:1–6. : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.003Google Scholar

Bogner, G, Strobl, M, Schausberger, C, Fischer, T, Reisenberger, K, Jacobs, VR. Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance. J Perinat Med. 2015;43(6):707–13. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2014-0048. PMID: 25204214.Google Scholar

Mechanisms of upright breech birth. Vimeo; https://vimeo.com/305098551?ref=tw-shareGoogle Scholar