Aasi, J. et al. (The LIGO, VIRGO and NINJA-2 Collaborations) (2014). The NINJA-2 project: Detecting and characterizing gravitational waveforms modeled using numerical binary black hole simulations. Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 115004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (2016a). Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102.Google Scholar

Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (2016b). Properties of the binary black hole merger GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102.Google Scholar

Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (2017). GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101.Google Scholar

Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (2018). GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040.Google Scholar

Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y., Hewitson, M., Krishnan, B., Sintes, A. M., Whelan, J. T., Brügmann, B., Diener, P., Dorband, N., Gonzalez, J., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Pollney, D., Rezzolla, L., Santamaría, L., Sperhake, U., and Thornburg, J. (2008). Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes: Nonspinning binaries. Phys. Rev. D 77, 104017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajith, P., Boyle, M., Brown, D. A., Brügmann, B., Buchman, L. T., Cadonati, L., Campanelli, M., Chu, T., Etienne, Z. B., Fairhurst, S., Hannam, M., Healy, J., Hinder, I., Husa, S., Kidder, L. E., Krishnan, B., Laguna, P., Liu, Y. T., London, L., Lousto, C. O., Lovelace, G., MacDonald, I., Marronetti, P., Mohapatra, S., Mösta, P., Müller, D., Mundim, B. C., Nakano, H., Ohme, F., Paschalidis, V., Pekowsky, L., Pollney, D., Pfeiffer, H. P., Ponce, M., Pürrer, M., Reifenberger, G., Reisswig, C., Santamaría, L., Scheel, M. A., Shapiro, S. L., Shoemaker, D., Sopuerta, C. F., Sperhake, U., Szilágyi, B., Taylor, N. W., Tichy, W., Tsatsin, P., and Zlochower, Y. (2012). The NINJA-2 catalog of hybrid post-Newtonian/numerical-relativity waveforms for non-precessing black-hole binaries. Class. Quantum Grav. 29, 124001.Google Scholar

Ajith, P., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Chen, Y., Brügmann, B., Dorband, N., Müller, D., Ohme, F., Pollney, D., Reisswig, C., Santamaría, L., and Seiler, J. (2011). Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with nonprecessing spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101.Google Scholar

Albrecht, A. and Steinhardt, P. J. (1982). Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1220.Google Scholar

Alcubierre, M. (2008). Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Alcubierre, M. and Brügmann, B. (2001). Simple excision of a black hole in 3+1 numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D 63, 104006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcubierre, M., Brügmann, B., Diener, P., Koppitz, M., Pollney, D., Seidel, E., and Takahashi, R. (2003). Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision. Phys. Rev. D 67, 084023.Google Scholar

Alic, D., Bona-Casas, C., Bona, C., Rezzolla, L., and Palenzuela, C. (2012). Conformal and covariant formulation of the Z4 system with constraint-violation damping. Phys. Rev. D 85, 064040.Google Scholar

Ansorg, M., Brügmann, B., and Tichy, W. (2004). Single-domain spectral method for black hole puncture data. Phys. Rev. D 70, 064011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., and Misner, C. W. (1962). The dynamics of general relativity. In L. Witten (ed.), Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research, pp. 227. Wiley, New York. Also available at gr-qc/0405109.Google Scholar

Aylott, B., Baker, J. G., Boggs, W. D., Boyle, M., Brady, P. R., Brown, D. A., Brügmann, B., Buchman, L. T., Buonanno, A., Cadonati, L., Camp, J., Campanelli, M., Centrella, J., Chatterji, S., Christensen, N., Chu, T., Diener, P., Dorband, N., Etienne, Z. B., Faber, J., Fairhurst, S., Farr, B., Fischetti, S., Guidi, G., Goggin, L. M., Hannam, M., Herrmann, F., Hinder, I., Husa, S., Kalogera, V., Keppel, D., Kidder, L. E., Kelly, B. J., Krishnan, B., Laguna, P., Lousto, C. O., Mandel, I., Marronetti, P., Matzner, R., McWilliams, S. T., Matthews, K. D., Mercer, R. A., Mohapatra, S. R. P., Mroué, A. H., Nakano, H., Ochsner, E., Pan, Y., Pekowsky, L., Pfeiffer, H. P., Pollney, D., Pretorius, F., Raymond, V., Reisswig, C., Rezzolla, L., Rinne, O., Robinson, C., Röver, C., Santamaría, L., Sathyaprakash, B., Scheel, M. A., Schnetter, E., Seiler, J., Shapiro, S. L., Shoemaker, D., Sperhake, U., Stroeer, A., Sturani, R., Tichy, W., Liu, Y. T., van der Sluys, M., van Meter, J. R., Vaulin, R., Vecchio, A., Veitch, J., Viceré, A., Whelan, J. T., and Zlochower, Y. (2009). Testing gravitational-wave searches with numerical relativity waveforms: Results from the first Numerical INJection Analysis (NINJA) project. Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 165008.Google Scholar

Baker, J. G., Campanelli, M., Pretorius, F., and Zlochower, Y. (2007). Comparisons of binary black hole merger waveforms. Class. Quantum Grav. 24, S25.Google Scholar

Baker, J. G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., and van Meter, J. (2006). Gravitational-wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102.Google Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W. (2000). Innermost stable circular orbit of binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 62, 024018.Google Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W. (2012). Alternative approach to solving the Hamiltonian constraint. Phys. Rev. D 85, 084013.Google Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W. and Naculich, S. G. (2007). Analytical representation of a black hole puncture solution. Phys. Rev. D 75, 067502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W. and Shapiro, S. L. (1998). Numerical integration of Einstein’s field equations. Phys. Rev. D 59, 024007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W. and Shapiro, S. L. (2010). Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W., Montero, P. J., Cordero-Carrión, I., and Müller, E. (2013). Numerical relativity in spherical polar coordinates: Evolution calculations with the BSSN formulation. Phys. Rev. D 87, 044026.Google Scholar

Beig, R. and Murchadha, N. Ó. (1994). Trapped surfaces in vacuum spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 419.Google Scholar

Beig, R. and Murchadha, N. Ó. (1996). Vacuum spacetimes with future trapped surfaces. Class. Quantum Grav. 13, 739.Google Scholar

Beig, R. and Murchadha, N. Ó. (1998). Late time behavior of the maximal slicing of the Schwarzschild black hole. Phys. Rev. D 57, 4728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann, P. G. (1957). Summary of the Chapel Hill Conference. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 352.Google Scholar

Bernuzzi, S. and Hilditch, D. (2010). Constraint violation in free evolution schemes: Comparing the BSSNOK formulation with a conformal decomposition of the Z4 formulation. Phys. Rev. D 81, 084003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blecha, L., Sijacki, D., Kelley, L. Z., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Snyder, G., and Hernquist, L. (2016). Recoiling black holes: Prospects for detection and implications of spin alignment. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogdanovic, T., Reynolds, C. S., and Miller, M. C. (2007). Alignment of the spins of supermassive black holes prior to merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 661, L147.Google Scholar

Bona, C., Ledvinka, T., Palenzuela, C., and Zacek, M. (2003). General-covariant evolution formalism for numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D 67, 104005.Google Scholar

Bona, C., Massó, J., Seidel, E., and Stela, J. (1995). New formalism for numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 600.Google Scholar

Bona, C. and Palenzuela, C. (2005). Elements of Numerical Relativity: From Einstein’s Equations to Black Hole Simulations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bona, C., Palenzuela-Luque, C., and Bona-Casas, C. (2009). Elements of Numerical Relativity and Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bonazzola, S., Gourgoulhon, E., Grandclément, P., and Novak, J. (2004). A constrained scheme for Einstein equations based on Dirac gauge and spherical coordinates. Phys. Rev. D 70, 104007.Google Scholar

Bowen, J. M. and York, J. W. Jr. (1980). Time-asymmetric initial data for black holes and black hole collisions. Phys. Rev. D 21, 2047.Google Scholar

Brandt, S. and Brügmann, B. (1997). A simple construction of initial data for multiple black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3606.Google Scholar

Brill, D. R. and Lindquist, R. W. (1963). Interaction energy in geometrostatics. Phys. Rev. 131, 471.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2008). Puncture evolution of Schwarzschild black holes. Phys. Rev. D 77, 044018.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. (2009). Covariant formulations of Baumgarte, Shapiro, Shibata and Nakamura and the standard gauge. Phys. Rev. D 79, 104029.Google Scholar

Brügmann, B., Tichy, W., and Jansen, N. (2004). Numerical simulation of orbiting black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 211101.Google Scholar

Buonanno, A., Cook, G. B., and Pretorius, F. (2007). Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D 75, 124018.Google Scholar

Buonanno, A. and Damour, T. (1999). Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 59, 084006.Google Scholar

Campanelli, M., Lousto, C. O., Marronetti, P., and Zlochower, Y. (2006a). Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101.Google Scholar

Campanelli, M., Lousto, C. O., and Zlochower, Y. (2006b). Spinning black holes: The orbital hang-up. Phys. Rev. D 74, 041501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campanelli, M., Lousto, C. O., Zlochower, Y., and Merritt, D. (2007a). Large merger recoils and spin flips from generic black-hole binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett. 659, L5.Google Scholar

Campanelli, M., Lousto, C. O., Zlochower, Y., and Merritt, D. (2007b). Maximum gravitational recoil. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231102.Google Scholar

Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Herdeiro, C. A. R., and Sperhake, U. (2015). Exploring new physics frontiers through numerical relativity. Living Rev. Rel. 18, 1.Google Scholar

Carroll, S. (2004). Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Addison-Wesley, San Francisco. Reissued in 2019 by Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Caudill, M., Cook, G. B., Grigsby, J. D., and Pfeiffer, H. P. (2006). Circular orbits and spin in black-hole initial data. Phys. Rev. D 74, 064011.Google Scholar

Chiaberge, M., Tremblay, G. R., Capetti, A., and Norman, C. (2018). The recoiling black hole candidate 3C 186: Spatially resolved quasar feedback and further evidence of a blueshifted broad-line region. Astrophys. J. 861, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choptuik, M. W. (1993). Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 9.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. (2015). Introduction to General Relativity, Black Holes and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Clough, K., Flauger, R., and Lim, E. A. (2018). Robustness of inflation to large tensor perturbations. J. Cosmology Astroparticle Phys. 2018, 065.Google Scholar

Cook, G. B. (1991). Initial data for axisymmetric black-hole collisions. Phys. Rev. D44, 2983.Google Scholar

Cook, G. B. (1994). Three-dimensional initial data for the collision of two black holes. II. Quasicircular orbits for equal-mass black holes. Phys. Rev. D 50, 5025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cook, G. B. and Pfeiffer, H. P. (2004). Excision boundary conditions for black-hole initial data. Phys. Rev. D 70, 104016.Google Scholar

De Donder, T. (1921). La gravifique einsteinienne. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar

de Felice, A., Larrouturou, F., Mukohyama, S., and Oliosi, M. (2019). On the absence of conformally flat slicings of the Kerr spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 100, 124044.Google Scholar

Dennison, K. A. and Baumgarte, T. W. (2014). A simple family of analytical trumpet slices of the Schwarzschild spacetime. Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 117001.Google Scholar

Dennison, K. A., Baumgarte, T. W., and Montero, P. J. (2014). Trumpet slices in Kerr spacetimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261101.Google Scholar

Droste, J. (1917). The field of a single centre in Einstein’s theory of gravitation, and the motion of a particle in that field. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings, Series B Phys. Sci. 19, 197.Google Scholar

East, W. E., Kleban, M., Linde, A., and Senatore, L. (2016). Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe. J. Cosmology Astroparticle Phys. 2016, 010.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1915). Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Sitzber., 844.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. (1916). Näherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Sitzber., 688.Google Scholar

Estabrook, F., Wahlquist, H., Christensen, S., Dewitt, B., Smarr, L., and Tsiang, E. (1973). Maximally slicing a black hole. Phys. Rev. D 7, 2814.Google Scholar

Etienne, Z. B., Liu, Y. T., and Shapiro, S. L. (2010). Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in dynamical spacetimes: A new adaptive mesh refinement implementation. Phys. Rev. D 82, 084031.Google Scholar

Etienne, Z. B., Paschalidis, V., Haas, R., Mösta, P., and Shapiro, S. L. (2015). Illinois-GRMHD: An open-source, user-friendly GRMHD code for dynamical spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 175009.Google Scholar

Etienne, Z. B., Wan, M.-B., Babiuc, M. C., McWilliams, S. T., and Choudhary, A. (2017). GiRaFFE: An open-source general relativistic force-free electrodynamics code. Class. Quantum Grav. 34, 215001.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. (1985). On the hyperbolicity of Einstein’s and other gauge field equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 100, 525.Google Scholar

Garat, A. and Price, R. H. (2000). Nonexistence of conformally flat slices of the Kerr spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 61, 124011.Google Scholar

Garfinkle, D. (2002). Harmonic coordinate method for simulating generic singularities. Phys. Rev. D 65, 044029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerosa, D., Kesden, M., O’Shaughnessy, R., Klein, A., Berti, E., Sperhake, U., and Trifirò, D. (2015). Precessional instability in binary black holes with aligned spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 141102.Google Scholar

Giblin, J. T. and Tishue, A. J. (2019). Preheating in full general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 100, 063543.Google Scholar

Gieg, H., Dietrich, T., and Ujevic, M. (2019). Simulating binary neutron stars with hybrid equation of states: Gravitational waves, electromagnetic signatures, and challenges for numerical relativity. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1908.03135.Google Scholar

Gleiser, R. J., Nicasio, C. O., Price, R. H., and Pullin, J. (1998). Evolving the Bowen– York initial data for spinning black holes. Phys. Rev. D 57, 3401.Google Scholar

Gleiser, R. J., Khanna, G., and Pullin, J. (2002). Evolving the Bowen–York initial data for boosted black holes. Phys. Rev. D 66, 024035.Google Scholar

González, J. A., Hannam, M. D., Sperhake, U., Brugmann, B., and Husa, S. (2007). Supermassive recoil velocities for binary black-hole mergers with antialigned spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231101.Google Scholar

González, J. A., Sperhake, U., Brügmannn, B., Hannam, M., and Husa, S. (2007). Total recoil: The maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 091101.Google Scholar

Gopal-Krishna, P. L. Biermann, L. Á. Gergely, , and Wiita, P. J. (2012). On the origin of X-shaped radio galaxies. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 12, 127.Google Scholar

Gourgoulhon, E. (2012). 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Gourgoulhon, E., Grandclément, P., and Bonazzola, S. (2002). Binary black holes in circular orbits. I. A global spacetime approach. Phys. Rev. D 65, 044020.Google Scholar

Grandclément, P., Gourgoulhon, E., and Bonazzola, S. (2002). Binary black holes in circular orbits. II. Numerical methods and first results. Phys. Rev. D 65, 044021.Google Scholar

Griffiths, D. J. (2013). Introduction to Electrodynamics (4th edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gullstrand, A. (1922). Allgemeine Lösung des statischen Einkörperproblems in der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Arkiv för Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik 16, 1.Google Scholar

Gundlach, C. and Martín-García, J. M. (2007). Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse. Living Rev. Rel. 10, 5.Google Scholar

Gundlach, C., Martín-García, J. M., Calabrese, G., and Hinder, I. (2005). Constraint damping in the Z4 formulation and harmonic gauge. Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 3767.Google Scholar

Guth, A. H. (1981). Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D 23, 347.Google Scholar

Hahn, S. G. and Lindquist, R. W. (1964). The two-body problem in geometrodynamics. Ann. Phys. 29, 304.Google Scholar

Hannam, M., Husa, S., Murchadha, N. Ó., Brügmann, B., González, J. A., and Sperhake, U. (2007a). Where do moving punctures go? J. Phys. Conf. Series 66, 012047.Google Scholar

Hannam, M., Husa, S., Pollney, D., Brügmann, B., and O’Murchadha, N. (2007b). Geometry and regularity of moving punctures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 241102.Google Scholar

Hannam, M., Husa, S., Ohme, F., Brügmann, B., and Murchadha, N. Ó. (2008). Wormholes and trumpets: The Schwarzschild spacetime for the moving-puncture generation. Phys. Rev. D 78, 064020.Google Scholar

Hartle, J. B. (2003). Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity. Addison Wesley, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Healy, J. and Lousto, C. O. (2018). Hangup effect in unequal mass binary black hole mergers and further studies of their gravitational radiation and remnant properties. Phys. Rev. D 97, 084002.Google Scholar

Healy, J., Lange, J., O’Shaughnessy, R., Lousto, C. O., Campanelli, M., Williamson, A. R., Zlochower, Y., Calderón Bustillo, J., Clark, J. A., Evans, C., Ferguson, D., Ghonge, S., Jani, K., Khamesra, B., Laguna, P., Shoemaker, D. M., Boyle, M., García, A., Hemberger, D. A., Kidder, L. E., Kumar, P., Lovelace, G., Pfeiffer, H. P., Scheel, M. A., and Teukolsky, S. A. (2018). Targeted numerical simulations of binary black holes for GW170104. Phys. Rev. D 97, 064027.Google Scholar

Healy, J., Lousto, C. O., Lange, J., O’Shaughnessy, R., Zlochower, Y., and Campanelli, M. (2019). The second RIT binary black hole simulations catalog and its application to gravitational waves parameter estimation. Phys. Rev. D 100, 024021.Google Scholar

Herrmann, F., Hinder, I., Shoemaker, D., and Laguna, P. (2007). Unequal-mass binary black hole plunges and gravitational recoil. Class. Quantum Grav. 24, S33.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. (1915). Grundlagen der Physik. Gott. Nachr. 27, 395.Google Scholar

Hilditch, D. (2015). Dual foliation formulations of general relativity. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1509.02071.Google Scholar

Hinder, I., Buonanno, A., Boyle, M., Etienne, Z. B., Healy, J., Johnson-McDaniel, N. K., Nagar, A., Nakano, H., Pan, Y., Pfeiffer, H. P., Pürrer, M., Reisswig, C., Scheel, M. A., Schnetter, E., Sperhake, U., Szilágyi, B., Tichy, W., Wardell, B., Zenginoğlu, A., Alic, D., Bernuzzi, S., Bode, T., Brügmann, B., Buchman, L. T., Campanelli, M., Chu, T., Damour, T., Grigsby, J. D., Hannam, M., Haas, R., Hemberger, D. A., Husa, S., Kidder, L. E., Laguna, P., London, L., Lovelace, G., Lousto, C. O., Marronetti, P., Matzner, R. A., Mösta, P., Mroué, A., Müller, D., Mundim, B. C., Nerozzi, A., Paschalidis, V., Pollney, D., Reifenberger, G., Rezzolla, L., Shapiro, S. L., Shoemaker, D., Taracchini, A., Taylor, N. W., Teukolsky, S. A., Thierfelder, M., Witek, H., and Zlochower, Y. (2013). Error-analysis and comparison to analytical models of numerical waveforms produced by the NRAR Collaboration. Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 025012.Google Scholar

Hulse, R. A. and Taylor, J. H. (1975). Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. Astrophys. J. Lett. 195, L51.Google Scholar

Isenberg, J. (1978). Unpublished.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd edn). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Kennefick, D. (2005 ). Einstein versus the Physical Review. Physics Today 58, 43.Google Scholar

Kerr, R. P. (1963). Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, S., Chatziioannou, K., Hannam, M., and Ohme, F. (2018). Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects. Phys. Rev. D 100, 024059.Google Scholar

Kidder, L. E., Field, S. E., Foucart, F., Schnetter, E., Teukolsky, S. A., Bohn, A., Deppe, N., Diener, P., Hébert, F., Lippuner, J., Miller, J., Ott, C. D., Scheel, M. A., and Vincent, T. (2017). SpECTRE: A task-based discontinuous Galerkin code for relativistic astrophysics. J. Comp. Phys. 335, 84.Google Scholar

Knapp, A. M., Walker, E. J., and Baumgarte, T. W. (2002). Illustrating stability properties of numerical relativity in electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 65, 064031.Google Scholar

Komossa, S. (2012). Recoiling black holes: Electromagnetic signatures, candidates, and astrophysical implications. Adv. Astron. 2012, 364973.Google Scholar

Lanczos, C. (1922). Ein vereinfachtes Koordinatensystem für die Einsteinschen Gravitationsgleichungen. Phys. Z. 23, 537.Google Scholar

LeVeque, R. (1992). Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws (2nd edn). Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland; Boston, USA.Google Scholar

Lichnerowicz, A. (1944). L’intégration des équations de la gravitation relativiste et la problème des n corps. J. Math. Pure Appl 23, 37.Google Scholar

Lightman, A. P., Press, W. H., Price, R. H., and Teukolsky, S. A. (1975). Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar

Lindblom, L., Scheel, M. A., Kidder, L. E., Owen, R., and Rinne, O. (2006). A new generalized harmonic evolution system. Class. Quantum Grav. 23, S447.Google Scholar

Linde, A. D. (1982). A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems. Phys. Lett. B 108, 389.Google Scholar

Lousto, C. O. and Healy, J. (2016). Unstable flip-flopping spinning binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 93, 124074.Google Scholar

Lousto, C. O. and Zlochower, Y. (2011). Hangup kicks: Still larger recoils by partial spin/orbit alignment of black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 231102.Google Scholar

Lousto, C. O., Zlochower, Y., and Campanelli, M. (2017). Modeling the black hole merger of QSO 3C 186. Astrophys. J. 841, L28.Google Scholar

Lovelace, G., Owen, R., Pfeiffer, H. P., and Chu, T. (2008). Binary-black-hole initial data with nearly-extremal spins. Phys. Rev. D 78, 084017.Google Scholar

May, M. M. and White, R. H. (1966). Hydrodynamic calculations of general-relativistic collapse. Phys. Rev. 141, 1232.Google Scholar

Merritt, D. and Ekers, R. D. (2002). Tracing black hole mergers through radio lobe morphology. Science 297, 1310.Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (2017). Gravitation (2nd edn). Freeman, New York.Google Scholar

Montero, P. J. and Cordero-Carrión, I. (2012). The BSSN equations in spherical coordinates without regularization: Vacuum and non-vacuum spherically symmetric systems. Phys. Rev. D 85, 124037.Google Scholar

Moore, T. A. (2013). A General Relativity Workbook. University Science Books, Mill Valley.Google Scholar

Mroué, A. H., Scheel, M. A., Szilágyi, B., Pfeiffer, H. P., Boyle, M., Hemberger, D. A., Kidder, L. E., Lovelace, G., Ossokine, S., Taylor, N. W., Zenginoğlu, A., Buchman, L. T., Chu, T., Foley, E., Giesler, M., Owen, R., and Teukolsky, S. A. (2013). Catalog of 174 binary black hole simulations for gravitational wave astronomy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 241104.Google Scholar

Nakamura, T., Oohara, K., and Kojima, Y. (1987). General relativistic collapse to black holes and gravitational waves from black holes. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 1.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T. and Penrose, R. (1968). New conservation laws for zero rest-mass fields in asymptotically flat space-time. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 305, 175.Google Scholar

Painlevé, P. (1921). Le mécanique classique et la théorie de la relativité. L’Académie des sciences 173, 677.Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Buonanno, A., Taracchini, A., Kidder, L. E., Mroué, A. H., Pfeiffer, H. P., Scheel, M. A., and Szilágyi, B. (2014). Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism. Phys. Rev. D 89, 084006.Google Scholar

Paschalidis, V., Etienne, Z. B., Gold, R., and Shapiro, S. L. (2013). An efficient spectral interpolation routine for the TwoPunctures code. arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1304.0457.Google Scholar

Petrich, L. I., Shapiro, S. L., and Teukolsky, S. A. (1985). Oppenheimer–Snyder collapse with maximal time slicing and isotropic coordinates. Phys. Rev. D 31, 2459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poisson, E. (2004). A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (2007). Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pretorius, F. (2005a). Evolution of binary black-hole spacetimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101.Google Scholar

Pretorius, F. (2005b). Numerical relativity using a generalized harmonic decomposition. Class. Quantum Grav. 22, 425.Google Scholar

Radice, D., Perego, A., Zappa, F., and Bernuzzi, S. (2018). GW170817: Joint constraint on the neutron star equation of state from multimessenger observations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L29.Google Scholar

Reinhart, B. (1973). Maximal foliations of extended Schwarzschild space. J. Math. Phys. 14, 719.Google Scholar

Rezzolla, L., Most, E. R., and Weih, L. R. (2018). Using gravitational-wave observations and quasi-universal relations to constrain the maximum mass of neutron stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L25.Google Scholar

Rezzolla, L. and Zanotti, O. (2013). Relativistic Hydrodynamics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ruchlin, I., Healy, J., Lousto, C. O., and Zlochower, Y. (2017). Puncture initial data for black-hole binaries with high spins and high boosts. Phys. Rev. D 95, 024033.Google Scholar

Ruiz, M., Shapiro, S. L., and Tsokaros, A. (2018). GW170817, general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and the neutron star maximum mass. Phys. Rev. D 97, 021501.Google Scholar

Scheel, M. A., Shapiro, S. L., and Teukolsky, S. A. (1995). Collapse to black holes in Brans–Dicke theory. I. Horizon boundary conditions for dynamical spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 51, 4208.Google Scholar

Scheel, M. A., Pfeiffer, H. P., Lindblom, L., Kidder, L. E., Rinne, O., and Teukolsky, S. A. (2006). Solving Einstein’s equations with dual coordinate frames. Phys. Rev. D 74, 104006.Google Scholar

Schutz, B. F. (1980). Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Schutz, B. F. (2009). A First Course in General Relativity (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Schwarzschild, K. (1916). Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Sitzber. Deut. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Kl. Math.-Phys. Tech., 189.Google Scholar

Seidel, E. and Suen, W.-M. (1992). Towards a singularity-proof scheme in numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shapiro, S. L. and Teukolsky, S. A. (1985a). Relativistic stellar dynamics on the computer. I. Motivation and numerical method. Astrophys. J. 298, 34.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. L. and Teukolsky, S. A. (1985b). Relativistic stellar dynamics on the computer. II. Physical applications. Astrophys. J. 298, 58.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. L. and Teukolsky, S. A. (1992). Collisions of relativistic clusters and the formation of black holes. Phys. Rev. D 45, 2739.Google Scholar

Shibata, M. (1999a). Fully general relativistic simulation of coalescing binary neutron stars: Preparatory tests. Phys. Rev. D 60, 104052.Google Scholar

Shibata, M. (1999b). Fully general relativistic simulation of merging binary clusters: Spatial gauge condition. Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, 1199.Google Scholar

Shibata, M. (2016). Numerical Relativity. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.Google Scholar

Shibata, M. and Nakamura, T. (1995). Evolution of three-dimensional gravitational waves: Harmonic slicing case. Phys. Rev. D 52, 5428.Google Scholar

Shibata, M., Uryū, K., and Friedman, J. L. (2004). Deriving formulations for numerical computation of binary neutron stars in quasicircular orbits. Phys. Rev. D 70, 044044.Google Scholar

Shibata, M., Fujibayashi, S., Hotokezaka, K., Kiuchi, K., Kyutoku, K., Sekiguchi, Y., and Tanaka, M. (2017). Modeling GW170817 based on numerical relativity and its implications. Phys. Rev. D 96, 123012.Google Scholar

Smarr, L. L. (1979). Gauge conditions, radiation formulae, and the two black hole collision. In L. L. Smarr (ed.), Sources of Gravitational Radiation, pp. 245. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smarr, L. and York, J. W. Jr. (1978). Radiation gauge in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 17, 1945.Google Scholar

Starobinsky, A. A. (1980). A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity. Phys. Lett. B 91, 99.Google Scholar

Taracchini, A., Buonanno, A., Pan, Y., Hinderer, T., Boyle, M., Hemberger, D. A., Kidder, L. E., Lovelace, G., Mroué, A. H., Pfeiffer, H. P., Scheel, M. A., Szilágyi, B., Taylor, N. W., and Zenginoglu, A. (2014). Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins. Phys. Rev. D 89, 061502.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. D. and Wheeler, J. A. (2000). Exploring Black Holes. Addison Wesley Longman. San Francisco.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. H. and Weisberg, J. M. (1982). A new test of general relativity – gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. Astrophys. J. 253, 908.Google Scholar

Teukolsky, S. A. (2000). On the stability of the iterated Crank–Nicholson method in numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D 61, 087501.Google Scholar

Thierfelder, M., Bernuzzi, S., and Brügmann, B. (2011). Numerical relativity simulations of binary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D 84, 044012.Google Scholar

Thornburg, J. (1987). Coordinates and boundary conditions for the general relativistic initial data problem. Class. Quantum Grav. 4, 1119.Google Scholar

Thorne, K. S. and MacDonald, D. (1982). Electrodynamics in curved spacetime − 3+1 formulation. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 198, 339.Google Scholar

Toro, E. F. (1999). Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

van Meter, J. R., Baker, J. G., Koppitz, M., and Choi, D.-I. (2006). How to move a black hole without excision: Gauge conditions for the numerical evolution of a moving puncture. Phys. Rev. D 73, 124011.Google Scholar

Wald, R. M. (1984). General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S. (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. R. and Mathews, G. J. (1995). Instabilities in close neutron star binaries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4161.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. (1971). Gravitational degrees of freedom and the initial-value problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1656.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. (1979). Kinematics and dynamics of general relativity. In L. L. Smarr (ed.), Sources of Gravitational Radiation, pp. 83. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. (1999). Conformal ‘thin-sandwich’ data for the initial-value problem of general relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1350.Google Scholar

Zangwill, A. (2013). Modern Electrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zlochower, Y. and Lousto, C. O. (2015). Modeling the remnant mass, spin, and recoil from unequal-mass, precessing black-hole binaries: The intermediate mass ratio regime. Phys. Rev. D 92, 024022.Google Scholar