Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T21:08:24.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Fundamental Level of Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2021

Frank Krueger
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brion, S., Lount, R. B., & Doyle, S. P. (2015). Knowing if you are trusted: Does meta-accuracy promote trust development? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(7), 823830. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615590200Google Scholar
Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35(2), 327347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312511Google Scholar
Buyukcan‐Tetik, A., Finkenauer, C., Siersema, M., Vander Heyden, K., & Krabbendam, L. (2015). Social relations model analyses of perceived self‐control and trust in families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 209223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12154Google Scholar
Campagna, R. L., Dirks, K. T., Knight, A. P., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2020). On the relation between felt trust and actual trust: Examining pathways to and implications of leader trust meta-accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(9), 9941012. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000474Google Scholar
Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Rubin, H. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 1431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, N. L., & Weber, J. M. (2010). Not pollyannas: Higher generalized trust predicts lie detection ability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 274279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609360261Google Scholar
Cortes, K., & Wood, J. V. (2019). How was your day? Conveying care, but under the radar, for people lower in trust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.003Google Scholar
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 11341150. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2016). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations (pp. 88114). John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2019). Why people trust: Solved puzzles and open mysteries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 366371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838255Google Scholar
Eibach, R. P., & Mock, S. E. (2011). The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents’ risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 694697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.009Google Scholar
Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society. W. W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Fonseca, M. A., & Peters, K. (2018). Will any gossip do? Gossip does not need to be perfectly accurate to promote trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 107, 253281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.015Google Scholar
Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002Google Scholar
Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2019). Income inequality, life satisfaction inequality and trust: A cross country panel analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 17171737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0021-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B., & Zednik, A. (2019). Trust and age: An experiment with current and former students. Economics Letters, 181, 3739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.04.004Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2003). Gaming trust. In Ostrom, E. & Walker, J. (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 80101). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In Lerner, M. J. & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 261284). Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187220). Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.Google Scholar
Kille, D. R., Eibach, R. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Who can’t take a compliment? The role of construal level and self-esteem in accepting positive feedback from close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 4049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.003Google Scholar
Kim, J. S., Weisberg, Y. J., Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., Farrell, A. K., & Johnson, W. F. (2015). Ruining it for both of us: The disruptive role of low-trust partners on conflict resolution in romantic relationships. Social Cognition, 33(5), 520542. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.520Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (2001). Trust and intergroup negotiation. In Brown, R. & Gaertner, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 431450). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self‐evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 112127. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchies, L. B., Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., et al. (2013). Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 673694. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031054Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. H., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2017). Dispositional pathways to trust: Self-esteem and agreeableness interact to predict trust and negative emotional disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 95116. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000093Google Scholar
Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 5568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002Google Scholar
Molden, D. C., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 255268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.014Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Pinkus, R. T., Holmes, J. G., et al. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 485502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023233Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. W. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367389). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies of interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443452. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464Google Scholar
Saef, R. M., Porter, C. M., Woo, S. E., & Wiese, C. (2019). Getting off on the right foot: The role of openness to experience in fostering initial trust between culturally dissimilar partners. Journal of Research in Psychology, 79, 176187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.003Google Scholar
Shallcross, S. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2012). Trust and responsiveness in strain-test situations: A dyadic perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 10311044. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026829Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587607). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2016). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 91116). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stamos, A., Altsitsiadis, E., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Investigating the effect of childhood socioeconomic background on interpersonal trust: Lower childhood socioeconomic status predict lower levels of trust. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 1925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.011Google Scholar
Ter Kuile, H., Kluwer, E. S., Finkenauer, C., & Van der Lippe, T. (2017). Predicting adaptation to parenthood: The role of responsiveness, gratitude, and trust. Personal Relationship, 24, 663682. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12202Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119143.Google Scholar
Uysal, A., Lin, H. L., & Bush, A. L. (2012). The reciprocal cycle of self‐concealment and trust in romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 844851. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1904Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 7176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414552473Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., & Posthuma, D. (2014). Genetic influences are virtually absent for trust. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93880. https://10.1371/journal.pone.0093880Google Scholar
Yucel, D. (2013). Number of siblings and generalized trust. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(8), 13991408. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.8.1399Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. J. (2019). I may not agree with you, but I trust you: Caring about social issues signals integrity. Psychological Science, 30(6), 880892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619837948Google Scholar

References

Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B., & Renner, E. (2000). The moonlighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(2), 265277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167–2681(00)00089-5Google Scholar
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047–2727(01)00084-6Google Scholar
Alós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust games and beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderhub, V., Engelmann, D., & Güth, W. (2002). An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(2), 197216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167–2681(01)00216-5Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(4), 343362.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627541700157Google Scholar
Banerjee, R. (2018). On the interpretation of World Values Survey trust question: Global expectations vs. local beliefs. European Journal of Political Economy, 55, 491510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.04.008Google Scholar
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single‐response sequential method. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 226232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090304Google Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C., Xiao, E., & Muldoon, R. (2011). Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 10(2), 170187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10387260Google Scholar
Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271283. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn004Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294Google Scholar
Bohnet, I., & Meier, S. (2012). Trust, distrust, and bargaining. In Croson, R. & Bolton, G. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution (pp. 183198). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730858.013.0017Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1996). Trust and third-party gossip. In Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 6889). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857331Google Scholar
Camerer, C., & Vepsalainen, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 115126. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090712Google Scholar
Camerer, C., & Weigelt, K. (1988). Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 56(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911840Google Scholar
Chang, L. J., & Smith, A. (2015). Social emotions and psychological games. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 133140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.010Google Scholar
Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Zünd, C. L. (2019). Civic honesty around the globe. Science, 365(6448), 7073. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1126/science.aau8712Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943Google Scholar
Cook, K. S., & State, B. (2015). Trust and economic organization. In Scott, R. & Kosslyn, S. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 111). Wiley.Google Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organizational Science, 12(4), 450467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640Google Scholar
Dufwenberg, M., & Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(2), 268298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003Google Scholar
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159181. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159Google Scholar
Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D., & Stacchetti, E. (1989). Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games and Economic Behavior, 1(1), 6079. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-8256(89)90005-5Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2004). The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review, 94(3), 526556. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464498Google Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 25572600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01408.xGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 10951131. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1095Google Scholar
Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1998). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625497Google Scholar
Ho, B. (2012). Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. Management Science, 58(1), 141158. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1410Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007Google Scholar
King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321(5890), 806810. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156902Google Scholar
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 12511288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. In Alt, J. & Shepsle, K. (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90143). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571657.006Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27(2), 245252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075319Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83(5), 12811302.Google Scholar
Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36(3), 441480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01255.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617Google Scholar
Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 5892. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463195007001004Google Scholar
Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. (2002). Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 139154. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051027001Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1995). But verify. New Republic, 213(11), 3639. [Review of Fukuyama, Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, The Free Press.]Google Scholar
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2011). Trust in public institutions over the business cycle. American Economic Review, 101(3), 281287. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.281Google Scholar
Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person–situation perspective. Review of General Psychology, 19(3), 249277. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000046Google Scholar

References

Appel, J., von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N. C., & Gratch, J. (2012). Does humanity matter? Analyzing the importance of social cues and perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012, Article 324694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/324694Google Scholar
Ba, S. L., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243268. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132332Google Scholar
Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017). Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 12331248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23451Google Scholar
Bente, G., Rüggenberg, S., Krämer, N. C., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 287318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00322.xGoogle Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social-history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027Google Scholar
Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. (2005). Computers that care: Investigating the effects or orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 161178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.002Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. (2008). Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(10), 37213726. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710069105Google Scholar
Coricelli, G., & Nagel, R. (2009). Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(23), 91639168. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807721106Google Scholar
De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., et al. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22(3), 331349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092Google Scholar
Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 373396. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721433Google Scholar
Fehr, E. (2009a). On the economics and biology of trust. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 235266. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235Google Scholar
Fehr, E. (2009b). Social preferences and the brain. In Glimcher, P. W., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R. A. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 215232). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–0-12-374176-9.00015-4Google Scholar
Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006Google Scholar
Fogg, B. J., & Nass, C. (1997). How users reciprocate to computers: An experiment that demonstrates behavior change. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1997, 331332. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120419Google Scholar
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 3440. https://doi.org/10.1145/355112.355120Google Scholar
Friedman, B., & Millett, L. I. (1997). Reasoning about computers as moral agents: A research note. In Friedman, B. (Ed.), Human values and the design of computer technology (pp. 201205). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A. I., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage, 16(3), 814821. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1117Google Scholar
Gallivan, M. J. (2001). Striking a balance between trust anti control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Information Systems Journal, 11(4), 277304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00108.xGoogle Scholar
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 5190. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254Google Scholar
Hubert, M., Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2018). Trust me if you can: Neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 118146. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0870Google Scholar
ITU. (2019). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019. www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004). Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028Google Scholar
Javor, A., Ransmayr, G., Struhal, W., & Riedl, R. (2016). Parkinson patients’ initial trust in avatars: Theory and evidence. PLoS ONE, 11(11), Article e0165998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165998Google Scholar
Javor, A., Riedl, R., Kirchmayr, M., Reichenberger, M., & Ransmayr, G. (2015). Trust behavior in Parkinson’s disease: Results of a trust game experiment. BMC Neurology, 15(126), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883–015-0374-5Google Scholar
Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007Google Scholar
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2009). In blog we trust? Deciphering credibility of components of the Internet among politically interested internet users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 175182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.004Google Scholar
Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., Steel, D. J., Abraham, C., & Loughlin, P. M. (2007). Identity formation, learning styles and trust in virtual worlds. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38(4), 9096. https://doi.org/10.1145/1314234.1314251Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 43024311. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997Google Scholar
Kopton, I., Sommer, J., Winkelmann, A., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2013). Users’ trust building processes during their initial connecting behavior in social networks: behavioral and neural evidence. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 107.Google Scholar
Krach, S., Blümel, I., Marjoram, D., et al. (2009). Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI. BMC Neuroscience, 10, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-9Google Scholar
Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., & Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS ONE, 3(7), Article e2597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002597Google Scholar
Krueger, F., McCabe, K., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 2008420089. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710103104Google Scholar
Krueger, F., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Toward a model of interpersonal trust drawn from neuroscience, psychology, and economics. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(2), 92101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004Google Scholar
Lankton, N. K., & McKnight, D. H. (2011). What does it mean to trust Facebook? Examining technology and interpersonal trust beliefs. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42(2), 3254. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989098.1989101Google Scholar
Lankton, N. K., McKnight, D. H., & Tripp, J. (2015). Technology, humanness, and trust: Rethinking trust in technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(10), 880918. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 12431270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792Google Scholar
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 1183211835. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211415698Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In Falcone, R., Singh, M., & Tan, Y. H. (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the human and artificial perspectives (pp. 2754). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81Google Scholar
Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(5–6), 527539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020–7373(87)80013-5Google Scholar
Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Henriksen, L., & Dryer, D. C. (1994). Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: Performance assessments of computers subsequent to “self-” or “other-” evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(3), 543559. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1025Google Scholar
Nass, C., Steuer, J. S., Tauber, E., & Reeder, H. (1993). Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: Computers as social actors. Proceedings of the INTERCHI ‘93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1993, 111112. https://doi.org/10.1145/259964.260137Google Scholar
Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392414. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0103Google Scholar
Paravastu, N., Gefen, D., & Creason, S. (2014). Understanding trust in IT artifacts: An evaluation of the impact of trustworthiness and trust on satisfaction with antiviral software. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 45(4), 3050. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691517.2691520Google Scholar
Paul, D. L., & McDaniel, R. R. (2004). A field study of the effect of interpersonal trust on virtual collaborative relationship performance. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 183227. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148633Google Scholar
Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 3759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015Google Scholar
Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2003). Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 365395. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036538Google Scholar
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press/CSLI.Google Scholar
Riedl, R., Hubert, M., & Kenning, P. (2010). Are there neural gender differences in online trust? An fMRI study on the perceived trustworthiness of eBay offers. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 397428. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721434Google Scholar
Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 6391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026318Google Scholar
Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F. D., & Heekeren, H. (2011). Trusting humans and avatars: Behavioral and neural evidence. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems, 2011, 123.Google Scholar
Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F. D., & Heekeren, H. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 83114. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742–1222300404Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K, Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35(2), 395405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896–6273(02)00755-9Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. NeuroImage, 22(4), 16941703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.015Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. F. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617Google Scholar
Seppänen, R., Blomqvist, K., & Sundqvist, S. (2007). Measuring inter-organizational trust: A critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 249265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003Google Scholar
Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Wacker, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Understanding the formation of trust in IT artifacts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 2012.Google Scholar
Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 274287. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.17Google Scholar
Swan, J. E., Bowers, M. R., & Richardson, L. D. (1999). Customer trust in the salesperson: An integrative review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 93107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148–2963(97)00244-0Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tzieropoulos, H. (2013). The trust game in neuroscience: A short review. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 407416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.832375Google Scholar
Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(3), 72101. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005Google Scholar
Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5(3), 277283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn816Google Scholar
Yanquing, D., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data: Evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 6371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books.Google Scholar

References

Akash, K., Hu, W. L., Jain, N., & Reid, T. (2018). A classification model for sensing human trust in machines using EEG and GSR. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132743Google Scholar
Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.07.003Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In Guetzkow, H. (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men: Research in human relations (pp. 177190). Carnegie Press.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 3135.Google Scholar
Bellucci, G., Chernyak, S. V., Goodyear, K., Eickhoff, S. B., & Krueger, F. (2017). Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 38(3), 12331248. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23451Google Scholar
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social-history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027Google Scholar
Biros, D. P., Daly, M., & Gunsch, G. (2004). The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(2), 173189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021840.85686.57Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.Google Scholar
Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: The five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(1), 98107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2293Google Scholar
Chen, J. Y. C., & Terrence, P. I. (2009). Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment. Ergonomics, 52(8), 907920. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802680773Google Scholar
Chien, S. Y., Lewis, M., Sycara, K., Liu, J. S., & Kumru, A. (2016). Relation between trust attitudes toward automation, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, and big five personality traits. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 840–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601192Google Scholar
Costa, A. C. (2003). Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32(5), 605622. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310488360Google Scholar
De Visser, E. J., Beatty, P. J., Estepp, J. R., et al. (2018). Learning from the slips of others: Neural correlates of trust in automated agents. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(309), 115. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00309Google Scholar
Desai, M., Kaniarasu, P., Medvedev, M., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2013). Impact of robot failures and feedback on real-time trust. 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’13, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483596Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. (1995). The influence of an expert system on the user’s view: How to fool a lawyer. New Review of Applied Expert Systems, 1, 123138.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. (1999). User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(6), 399411. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999118832Google Scholar
Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., Tullis, T., & Dai, R. (2010). Efficiency, trust, and visual appeal: Usability testing through eye tracking. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.171Google Scholar
Drnec, K., Marathe, A. R., Lukos, J. R., & Metcalfe, J. S. (2016). From trust in automation to decision neuroscience: Applying cognitive neuroscience methods to understand and improve interaction decisions involved in human automation interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(290), 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00290Google Scholar
Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(1), 5064. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90046-5Google Scholar
Ellis, L. U., Sims, V. K., Chin, M. G., et al. (2005). Those a-maze-ing robots: Attributions of ability are based on form, not behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 49(3), 598601. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900382Google Scholar
Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), 462492. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185595Google Scholar
Erebak, S., & Turgut, T. (2019). Caregivers’ attitudes toward potential robot coworkers in elder care. Cognition, Technology and Work, 21(2), 327336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111–018-0512-0Google Scholar
Evers, V., Maldonado, H. C., Brodecki, T. L., & Hinds, P. J. (2008). Relational vs. group self-construal. 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’08, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349856Google Scholar
Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2003.1251796Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 14641480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Google Scholar
Groom, V., Srinivasan, V., Bethel, C. L., Murphy, R., Dole, L., & Nass, C. (2011). Responses to robot social roles and social role framing. International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928687Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A. (1996). Effects of control order, augmented feedback, input device and practice on tracking performance and perceived workload. Ergonomics, 39(9), 11461162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964535Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A. (2013). In search of vigilance: The problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. The American Psychologist, 68(2), 97109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030214Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A. (2019). Some pitfalls in the promises of automated and autonomous vehicles. Ergonomics, 62(4), 479495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1498136Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., & Schaefer, K. E. (2011). Can you trust your robot? Ergonomics in Design, 19(3), 2429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804611415045Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254Google Scholar
Hancock, P. A., Kessler, T. T., Kaplan, A. D., Brill, J. C., & Szalma, J. L. (2020). Evolving trust in robots: Specification through sequential and comparative meta-analyses. Human Factors, 62(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820922080Google Scholar
Haring, K. S., Matsumoto, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2013). How do people perceive and trust a lifelike robot. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science, 1, 425430.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. (2011). Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’11, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957704Google Scholar
Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2018). Under pressure: Examining social conformity with computer and robot groups. Human Factors, 60(8), 12071218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818788473Google Scholar
Hubert, M., Hubert, M., Linzmajer, M., Riedl, R., & Kenning, P. (2018). Trust me if you can: Neurophysiological insights on the influence of consumer impulsiveness on trustworthiness evaluations in online settings. European Journal of Marketing, 52(1–2), 118146. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0870Google Scholar
Jenkins, Q., & Jiang, X. (2010). Measuring trust and application of eye tracking in human robotic interaction. IIE Annual Conference Proceedings, 1.Google Scholar
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 5371. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04Google Scholar
Joosse, M., Lohse, M., Perez, J. G., & Evers, V. (2013). What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630863Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. D., Kessler, T. T., Sanders, T. L., Cruit, J., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A. (2020). Time to trust: Trust as a function of time in human-robot interaction. In Nam, C. & Lyons, J. (Eds.), Trust in human-robot interaction (pp. 143159). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, T., Stowers, K., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A. (2017). Comparisons of human-human trust with other forms of human-technology trust. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 13031307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601808Google Scholar
Khawaji, A., Zhou, J., Chen, F., & Marcus, N. (2015). Using galvanic skin response (GSR) to measure trust and cognitive load in the text-chat environment. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA15, 19891994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732766Google Scholar
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 12431270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392Google Scholar
Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1), 153184. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007Google Scholar
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 5080. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392Google Scholar
Li, D., Rau, P. L. P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(2), 175186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369–010-0056-9Google Scholar
Linderman, T. (2018). Using an orange to fool Tesla’s autopilot is probably a really bad ideas. Motherboard: Tech by Vice. www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3na9p/tesla-autosteer-orange-hackGoogle Scholar
Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Cnossen, F. (2010). Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 386397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007Google Scholar
McBride, M., & Morgan, S. (2010). Trust calibration for automated decision aids. Research Brief, 9, 111.Google Scholar
Merritt, S. M. (2011). Affective processes in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 53(4), 356370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811411912Google Scholar
Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811Google Scholar
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2020). Driver assistance technologies. United States Department of Transportation. www.nhtsa.gov/equipment/driver-assistance-technologiesGoogle Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board. (2017). Collision between a car operating with automated vehicle control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck. Highway Accident Report.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. (1967). What are perceptual reports about? Psychological Bulletin, 67(4), 249272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024320Google Scholar
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437454. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.14nomGoogle Scholar
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, E., Ullman, D., De Graaf, M. M. A., & Malle, B. F. (2017). What does a robot look like?: A multi-site examination of user expectations about robot appearance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61(1), 12151219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601786Google Scholar
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 6179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61Google Scholar
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95Google Scholar
Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology, and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 6391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026318Google Scholar
Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F., & Heekeren, H. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: A brain imaging study based on evolution theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 83114. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742–1222300404Google Scholar
Sanders, T. L., Kaplan, A. P., Koch, R., Schwartz, M., & Hancock, P. A. (2019). The relationship between trust and use choice in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 61(4), 614626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818816838Google Scholar
Schaefer, K. E. (2013). The perception and measurement of human-robot trust [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of trust in automation: Implications for understanding autonomy in future systems. Human Factors, 58(3), 377400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816634228Google Scholar
Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M. V., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209–005-0118-1Google Scholar
Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation-induced “complacency”: Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 111122. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0302_2Google Scholar
Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five-factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 7196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024170Google Scholar
Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., & Yanco, H. A. (2010). Considering the bystander’s perspective for indirect human-robot interaction. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’10, 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734506Google Scholar
Volante, W. G., Sosna, J., Kessler, T., Sanders, T. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2019). Social conformity effects on trust in simulation-based human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 61(5), 805815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818811190Google Scholar
Wang, L., Rau, P. L. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & Hinds, P. (2010). When in Rome: The role of culture and context in adherence to robot recommendations. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’10, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734454.1734578Google Scholar
Yagoda, R. E., & Gillan, D. J. (2012). You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human-robot interaction trust scale. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(3), 235248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369–012-0144-0Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Fundamental Level of Trust
  • Edited by Frank Krueger, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Trust
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770880.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Fundamental Level of Trust
  • Edited by Frank Krueger, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Trust
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770880.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Fundamental Level of Trust
  • Edited by Frank Krueger, George Mason University, Virginia
  • Book: The Neurobiology of Trust
  • Online publication: 09 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770880.002
Available formats
×