Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:42:39.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Principles and practice for biopsy diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal lesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Lester J. Layfield
Affiliation:
University of Missouri School of Medicine
Carlos W. Bedrossian
Affiliation:
Rush University Medical College, Chicago
Julia R. Crim
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Lucio Palombini
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Federico II'
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION TO THE DIAGNOSIS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL LESIONS

Fine needle aspiration and core biopsy are used at some oncology centers as the initial technique to obtain a tissue diagnosis for mass lesions occurring within the musculoskeletal system. A majority of such lesions are in actuality metastatic deposits from a primary malignancy arising elsewhere. Metastatic neoplasms usually present little difficulty in diagnosis. Primary lesions of the musculoskeletal system are a significantly greater diagnostic challenge and many authorities in histopathology of bone and soft tissue tumors have recommended against the use of small biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of these lesions. The resistance to the use of small volume specimens, especially fine needle aspiration (FNA), results from a combination of factors including the relative rarity of these lesions, the potential for radical deforming surgery and the young age of the patients in which many of these lesions occur. Musculoskeletal sarcomas account for less than 1% of all malignant neoplasms. The infrequency of these tumors results in limited experience with their morphologic appearances among surgical pathologists and cytopathologists except for those practicing at orthopedic oncology centers. Contributing to this reduction in the utilization of small biopsy procedures is the relatively high percentage of benign proliferations (pseudosarcomas) closely resembling true sarcomas. An additional issue which has slowed the implementation of FNA for the investigation of musculoskeletal neoplasms is concern that the technique may not procure sufficient sample to obtain reliable results with a variety of ancillary techniques including immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, RJ, Merino, MJ, Solomon, D, Yang, JC, Baker, AR. A prospective study of the value of core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of soft tissue masses. Surgery. 1992 Sep;112(3):536–543.Google Scholar
Bennert, KW, Abdul-Karim, FW. Fine needle aspiration cytology vs. needle core biopsy of soft tissue tumors. A comparison. Acta Cytol. 1994 May–Jun;38(3):381–384.Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, J, Wesley, RA, Glatstein, E, Rosenberg, SA. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas: results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer. 1984 Feb;53(3):530–541.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, MJ, Campman, SC, Davis, RL, Howell, LP. Fine needle aspiration cytology of sarcoma: retrospective review of diagnostic utility and specificity. Diagn Cytopathol. 1996 Jul;15(1):23–32.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domanski, HA, Akerman, M, Carlén, B, et al. Core-needle biopsy performed by the cytopathologist: a technique to complement fine needle aspiration of soft tissue and bone lesions. Cancer. 2005 Aug 25;105(4):229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enneking, WF. The issue of the biopsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Oct;64(8):1119–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillou, L, Coindre, JM, Bonichon, F, et al. Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, PK, Baloch, ZW. Intraoperative and on-site cytopathology consultation: utilization, limitations, and value. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002 Nov;19(4):227–236.Google ScholarPubMed
Haddadi-Nezhad, S, Larijani, B, Tavangar, SM, Nouraei, SM. Comparison of fine-needle-nonaspiration with fine-needle-aspiration technique in the cytologic studies of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pathol. 2003 Winter;14(4):369–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanbidge, AE, Arenson, AM, Shaw, PA, et al. Needle size and sample adequacy in ultrasound-guided biopsy of thyroid nodules. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1995 Jun;46(3):199–201.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoeber, I, Spillane, AJ, Fisher, C, Thomas, JM. Accuracy of biopsy techniques for limb and limb girdle soft tissue tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001 Jan–Feb;8(1):80–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Issakov, J, Flusser, G, Kollender, Y, et al. Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for bone and soft tissue tumors. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Jan;5(1):28–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, C, Liu, K, Hirschowitz, S, Klipfel, N, Layfield, LJ. Concordance of histopathologic and cytologic grading in musculoskeletal sarcomas: can grades obtained from analysis of the fine needle aspirates serve as the basis for therapeutic decisions? Cancer. 2002 Apr 25;96(2):83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabukçuoğlu, F, Kabukçuoğlu, Y, Kuzgun, U, Evren, I. Fine needle aspiration of malignant bone lesions. Acta Cytol. 1998 Jul–Aug;42(4):875–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, SE. Prognostication in soft tissue sarcomas; grading versus subtyping . . . or both? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed practical guidelines. Ann Diagn Pathol. 1999 Feb;3(1):48–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, SE, Geisinger, KR. Soft tissue sarcomas: the usefulness and limitations of fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998 Jul;110(1):50–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, SE, Ward, WG, Chauvenet, AR, Pettenati, MJ. The role of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the initial diagnosis of pediatric bone and soft tissue tumors: an institutional experience. Mod Pathol. 1998 Oct;11(10):923–928.Google ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, SE, Cappellari, JO, Bos, GD, Gold, SH, Ward, WG. Is fine needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Jan;115(1):59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layfield, LJ, Bentz, JS, Gopez, EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fine needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis. Cancer. 2001 Oct;93(5):319–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madhavan, VP, Smile, SR, Chandra, SS, Ratnakar, C. Value of core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2002 Apr;45(2):165–168.Google Scholar
Mankin, HJ, Lange, TA, Spanier, SS. The hazards of biopsy in patients with malignant primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Oct;64(8):1121–1127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagira, K, Yamamoto, T, Akisue, T, Marui, T, Hitora, T, Nakatani, T, et al. Reliability of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the initial diagnosis of soft-tissue lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Dec;27(6):354–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Soft Tissue Sarcoma vol. 2. 2008. .
Palmer, HE, Mukunyadzi, P, Culbreth, W, Thomas, JR. Subgrouping and grading of soft-tissue sarcomas by fine needle aspiration cytology: a histopathologic correlation study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001 May;24(5):307–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitman, MB, Abele, J, Ali, SZ, et al. Techniques for thyroid FNA: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008 Jun;36(6):407–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruhs, SA, el-Khoury GY, Chrischilles, EA. A cost minimization approach to the diagnosis of skeletal neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol. 1996 Jul;25(5):449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, MA. Biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Oct;64(8):1253–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skrzynski, MC, Biermann, JS, Montag, A, Simon, MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 May;78(5):644–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Söderlund, V. Combined radiology and cytology in the diagnosis of bone lesions: a review of 399 cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004 Apr;75(311):51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torriani, M, Etchebehere, M, Amstalden, E. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Mar;21(3):275–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unni, KK, Dahlin, DC. Grading of bone tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1984 Aug;1(3):165–172.Google ScholarPubMed
Unver, E, Yilmaz, A, Aksoy, F, et al. Does needle size affect diagnostic yield of transthoracic needle biopsy in malignant pulmonary lesions? Comparison of 18-, 22- and 25-gauge needles in surgical specimens. Respirology 2006 Sep;11(5):648–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakely, PE, Kneisl, JS. Soft tissue aspiration cytopathology. Cancer. 2000 Oct;90(5):292–298.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, MM, Rosenberg, AE, Bell, DA. Grading of spindle cell sarcomas in fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999 Dec;112(6):784–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welker, JA, Henshaw, RM, Jelinek, J, Shmookler, BM, Malawer, MM. The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer. 2000 Dec;89(12):2677–2686.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, YJ, Damron, TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Jul;128(7):759–764.Google ScholarPubMed
Yao, L, Nelson, SD, Seeger, LL, Eckardt, JJ, Eilber, FR. Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 1999 Sep;212(3):682–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, WS, Chia, KH, Poh, WT, Wong, CY. A comparison of trucut biopsy with fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Singapore Med J. 1999 Sep;40(9):587–589.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×