Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:09:03.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Judicial review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Mirko Bagaric
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Kim Boyd
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Penny Dimopoulos
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
John Vrachnas
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Constitutional framework underpinning Australian migration law involves the separation of powers between the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. This separation underpins the courts' review of administrative action. The legislature enacts legislation and the executive must comply with that legislation. The judiciary must apply the law that has been enacted and has a role in ensuring that there is lawful authority for acts of the executive and that all actions it takes are in accordance with law. If an individual believes that the executive (the government) has not complied with the law, they may bring an action before the courts using administrative law.

In this chapter, we explore the role of the courts in reviewing administrative action in relation to migration. In the last decade, this is the area where the boundaries of the relationship between the three branches of government have been explored and tested. The legislature has, in several amendments to the Migration Act 1958, attempted to control judicial review and the courts' responses are discussed below.

‘[F]ew areas of Australian law have attracted such sustained public attention in recent years as judicial review of migration decisions. … Successive governments have either enacted, or proposed, legislation designed to curtail the power of the courts to override the determinations of administrative decision-makers …’

The confrontation between the executive and the judiciary has probably been starker in this area of law more than in any other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Migration and Refugee Law in Australia
Cases and Commentary
, pp. 407 - 438
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×