Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
3 - Thought Experiments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory , pp. 21 - 45Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Brown, James Robert, 1986. ‘Thought experiments in the scientific revolution’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, James Robert, and Fehige, Yiftach, 2014. ‘Thought experiments’, in Zalta, Edward (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/thought-experiment/.Google Scholar
Carson, Tom, 1993. ‘Hare on utilitarianism and intuitive morality’, Erkenntnis 39: 305–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Stephen, 2000. ‘Thought experiments and personal identity’, Philosophical Studies 98: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa, 2002. ‘The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect’, in Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, 1998. ‘Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggqvist, Sören, 1996. Thought Experiments in Philosophy. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen, 2002. ‘Fearful thoughts’, The London Review of Books 24 (16): 16–18.Google Scholar
Norton, John, 1996. ‘Are thought experiments just what you thought?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 333–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, 1975. ‘The meaning of “meaning”’, in Gunderson, Keith (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 131–93.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Lopez, Eduardo, 2005. ‘Use and misuse of examples in normative ethics’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 39: 115–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter, 1972. ‘Famine, affluence, and morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, 1971. ‘A defense of abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 47–66.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, 1985. ‘The trolley problem’, Yale Law Journal 94: 1395–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, Peter, 1982. ‘Toward a Psychology of Common Sense’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 117–129.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, 1973, ‘The problem of dirty hands’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2: 160–80.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 1960. ‘Bodily continuity and personal identity’, Analysis 20: 117–20.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 1973. ‘A critique of utilitarianism’, in Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard (eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press, 75–150.Google Scholar
Wilkes, Kathleen, 1988. Real People: Personal Identity without Thought Experiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, 1965. ‘The universalizability of moral judgments’, The Monist 49: 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1965. ‘A lecture on ethics’, The Philosophical Review 74: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7
- Cited by