Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
7 - Realism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory , pp. 112 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adorno, Theodor and Horkheimer, Max, 1979. The Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Galston, William, 2010. ‘Realism in political theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 9: 385–411.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond, 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jubb, Robert, 2015a. Playing Kant at the court of King Arthur’, Political Studies 63: 919–34.Google Scholar
Jubb, Robert, 2015b. ‘The real value of equality’, The Journal of Politics 77: 679–691.Google Scholar
Jubb, Robert, 2016. ‘“Recover it from the facts as we know them”: practice-dependence’s predecessors’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 13(1): 77–99.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Second Edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul, Newburn, Tim, Taylor, Matthew, Mcgillivray, Catriona, Greenhill, Aster, Frayman, Harold and Proctor, Rob, 2011. Reading the Riots: Investigating England’s Summer of Disorder. London: The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Guardian.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981 After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Marmot, Michael, 2004. Status Syndrome: How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Enzo and Sleat, Matt, 2014. ‘Realism in normative political theory’, Philosophy Compass 9/10: 689–701.Google Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea, 2008. ‘Justice and the priority of politics to morality’, Journal of Political Philosophy 16: 137–64.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1989. ‘The liberalism of fear’, in Rosenblum, Nancy, ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 21–38.Google Scholar
Swift, Adam, 2014. Political Philosophy: A Beginner’s Guide for Students and Politicians. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Swift, Adam and White, Stuart, 2008. ‘Political theory, social science, and real politics’, in Leopold, David and Stears, Marc, eds., Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press, 49–69.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 1997. ‘Forward to basics’, in Franklin, J., ed., Equality. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 47–57.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 2002. Truth and Truthfulness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 2005a. In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 2005b. ‘Realism and moralism in political theory’, in Williams, 2005a, 1–17.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 2005c. ‘From freedom to liberty: the construction of a political value’, in Williams, 2005a, 75–96.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 2005f. ‘Modernity and the substance of ethical life’, in Williams, 2005a, 40–51.Google Scholar
- 22
- Cited by