Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:19:02.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - European migrants: an endangered species?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2010

Richard Baldwin
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Daniel Cohen
Affiliation:
Université de Paris I
Andre Sapir
Affiliation:
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Anthony Venables
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Economists and policy-makers alike typically complain about insufficient labour mobility within Europe. Yet, large internal migrations have been an enduring phenomenon in European economic history. Even in the nineteenth century, when Europeans went in great numbers to overseas destinations in an attempt to escape from deprivation and persecutions at home, intra-European migrations were quite large. During the 1890–1913 period, 6.596 million Italians migrated to the United States or to Latin America and 4.874 million went to European destinations (Ferenczi and Willcox, 1934). Similarly, a substantial share of Spanish migrants chose to migrate toward Europe, despite their cultural and political links with Latin America (Hatton and Williamson, 1994). The peak of intra-European migration came somewhat later, during the 1950s and 1960s, when overseas emigration fell abruptly and approximately 10.5 million migrants crossed European borders, mainly from Southern to Northern Europe (Razin and Sadka, 1995).

From an historical point of view, therefore, the lack of labour mobility within Europe is somewhat surprising. The evidence is however undisputed: intra-European labour mobility has indeed reached an historical low and compares quite unfavourably with similar findings for the United States. In turn, low labour mobility is a matter of great concern for European policy-makers. The reasons for this concern are well known. In the face of an idiosyncratic shock, regions can adjust by letting their exchange rate depreciate, by a drop in the real wage or by migration. The first option is unpalatable, as it may clash with the commitments of the European exchange rate system and the desire to fight off inflation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×