Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:38:37.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Measuring and interpreting connectivity for mammals in coniferous forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

L. Scott Mills
Affiliation:
Wildlife Biology Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
Michael K. Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of Montana, School of Forestry, Wildlife Biology Program, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
David A. Tallmon
Affiliation:
University of Montana, Division of Biological Sciences, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
Kevin P. Lair
Affiliation:
University of Montana, School of Forestry, Wildlife Biology Program, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
Cynthia J. Zabel
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Research Station
Robert G. Anthony
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Western coniferous forests have a history of natural disturbance due to fire, disease, and other factors (Agee 1993), but during the past century late-seral forests have been increasingly fragmented due to logging and development. For example, in the Pacific Northwest, less than half of pre-settlement, old-growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest remains, often in relatively small remnants of 100 ha or less in a matrix of clear-cuts and regenerating forest (Booth 1991, Garmon et al. 1999, Jules et al. 1999). Road building has also impacted wildlife habitat, with an average of 3.4 miles of road per square mile on United States Forest Service roaded-lands and approximately twice that on private lands (Federal Budget Consulting Group and Price-Waterhouse LLP 1997, Coghlan and Sowa 1998, Federal Register 2001, USDA 2001).

For certain species associated with late-seral forests, fragmentation due to human perturbations has two consequences: loss of habitat and changes in connectivity among remnants. Habitat loss, and the concomitant decrease in population size for some wildlife species, has garnered the most attention because such loss is painfully obvious both in its occurrence and its effects. The second consequence, the change in connectivity among populations, is more subtle and harder to measure.

Nevertheless, the importance of populations being connected versus isolated has been underscored in the scientific literature for at least 70 years. For example, biologists have long recognized that the interplay between population size, local adaptation, and gene flow (connectivity) will create a unique genetic structure across a landscape (Wright 1931).

Type
Chapter
Information
Mammal Community Dynamics
Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America
, pp. 587 - 613
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agee, J. K. 1993. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press, Washington DC, USA. 493 pages
Allendorf, F. W. 1983. Isolation, gene flow, and genetic differentiation among populations. Pages 51–65 in C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W. L. Thomas, editors. Genetics and Conservation: a Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, USA
Andrewartha, H. G. and L. C. Birch. 1954. The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Balding, D. J., M. J. Bishop, and C. Cannings. 2001. Handbook of Statistical Genetics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
Barton, N. H. 2001. The evolutionary consequences of gene flow and local adaptation: future approaches. In J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols. Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Beerli, P. and , J. Felsenstein. 2001. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in a subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98:4563–4568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, P. 1993. Determining minimum habitat areas and habitat corridors for cougars. Conservation Biology 7:94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, P. and , R. F. Noss. 1998. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?Conservation Biology 12:1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennetts, R. E., J. D. Nichols, J-O. Lebreton, R. Pradel, J. K. Hines, and W. M. Kitchens. 2001. Methods for estimating dispersal probabilities and related parameters using marked animals. Pages 3–17 in J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols. Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Blasius, B., , A. Huppert, and , L. Stone. 1999. Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems. Nature 399:354–359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blundell, G. M., , M. Ben-David, , P. Groves, , R. T. Bowyer, and , E. Geffen. 2002. Characteristics of sex-biased dispersal and gene flow in coastal river otters: implications for natural recolonization of extirpated populations. Molecular Ecology 11:289–303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, D. E. 1991. Estimating prelogging old-growth in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forestry 89:25–29Google Scholar
Bossart, J. L. and , D. P. Prowell. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:202–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouzat, J. L., , H. A. Lewin, and , K. N. Paige. 1998. The ghost of genetic diversity past: historical DNA analysis of the greater prairie chicken. American Naturalist 152:1–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, K. P. and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA
Burton, R. S., , P. D. Rawson, and , S. Edmands. 1999. Genetic architecture of physiological phenotypes: empirical evidence for coadapted gene complexes. American Zoologist 39:451–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, G. and R. Sowa. 1998. National Forest Road System and Use. USDA, Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office, USA
Cornuet, J., , S. Piry, , G. Luikart, , A. Estoup and , M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000Google ScholarPubMed
Crandall, K. A., , O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, , G. M. Mace, and , R. K. Wayne. 2000. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:290–295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, N., , F. X. Villablanca, and , G. K. Roderick. 1999. Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:17–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debinski, D. M. and , R. D. Holt. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14:342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, D. and , L. S. Mills. 1994. A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75:615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A., K. Ralls, M. Foster, M. E. Soule, D. Simberloff, D. Doak, J. A. Estes, L. S. Mills, D. Mattson, R. Dirzo, H. Arita, S. Ryan, E. A. Norse, R. F. Noss, and D. Johns. 1999. Connectivity: maintaining flows in fragmented landscapes. Pages 129–171 in M. E. Soulé and J. Terborgh, editors. Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks. Island Press, Washington DC, USA
Durall, D. M., , M. D. Jones, , E. F. Wright, , P. Kroeger, and , K. D. Coates. 1999. Species richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi in cutblocks of different sizes in the interior cedar-hemlock forests of northwestern British Columbia: sporocarps and ectomycorrhizae. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 29:1322–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. and , P. H. Raven. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science 165:1228–1231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahrig, L. and , G. Merriam. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation Biology 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Budget Consulting Group and Price-Waterhouse LLP. 1997. Financing Roads on the National Forests. Washington DC, USA
Federal Register. 2001. Special areas; roadless area conservation 12 January 2001. USDA, Forest Service 36 CFRPart 294
Ferguson, M. A. D. and , F. Messier 2000. Mass emigration of Arctic tundra caribou from a traditional winter range: population dynamics and physical condition. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R. 1995. Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genetical Research 66:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmon, S. L., F. J. Swanson, and T. A. Spies. 1999. Past, present, and future landscape patterns in the Douglas-fir region of the Pacific Northwest. Pages 61–86 in J. A. Rochelle, L. A. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski, editors. Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications. Brill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Gashwiler, J. S. 1970. Plant and mammal changes on a clear-cut in West-Central Oregon. Ecology 51:1018–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudet, J., , N. Perrin, and , P. Wasser. 2002. Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Molecular Ecology 11:1103–1114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadley, E. A., , M. H. Hohn, , J. A. Leonard, and , R. K. Wayne. 1998. A genetic record of population isolation in pocket gophers during Holocene climatic change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95:6893–6896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, S. M., , M. D. Jones, , G. E. Bradfield, , M. Gillespie, and , D. M. Durall. 1999. Effects of clear-cut logging on the diversity and persistence of ectomycorrhizae at a subalpine forest. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 29:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, S. M. 1998. Molecular contributions to conservation. Ecology 79:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. and M. Gilpin. 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA
Hanski, I., , J. Alho, and , A. Moilanen. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A. and , S. Harrison. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 25:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. 1995. Gene flow and genetic restoration: the Florida panther as a case study. Conservation Biology 9:996–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. 1999. Perspective: Highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53:313–318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, G. R. 1994. Conservation corridors and contagious disease: a cautionary note. Conservation Biology 8:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ims, R. A. and N. G. Yoccoz. 1997. Studying transfer processes in metapopulations. Pages 247–265 in I. A. Hanski, and M. E. Gilpin, editors. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA
Jules, E., , E. Frost, , D. Tallmon, and , L. S. Mills. 1999. Ecological consequences of forest fragmentation in the Klamath region. Natural Areas Journal 19:368–378Google Scholar
Kalinowski, S. T. and , R. S. Waples. 2002. Relationship of effective to census size in fluctuating populations. Conservation Biology 16:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D., , D. V. Duren, and , P. N. Hooge. 1996. Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:514–517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, M. H. and , R. K. Wayne. 1997. Facts from feces revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:223–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, R. C. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conservation Biology 1:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lair, K. P. 2001. The effects of forest fragmentation and forest edge on Columbian mouse and southern red-backed vole demography. MS Thesis, University of Montana
Leberg, P. L. 1990. Genetic considerations in the design of introduction programs. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 55: 609–619Google Scholar
Lebreton, J.-D., , K. P. Burnham, , J. Clobert, and , D. R. Anderson. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62:67–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidicker, W. Z. Jr. and J. L. Patton. 1987. Patterns of dispersal and genetic structure in populations of small rodents. Pages 144–161 in D. Chepko-Sade and Z. T. Halpin, editors. Mammalian Dispersal Patterns. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Lindenmayer, D. and R. Peakall. 2000. The Tumut experiment – integrating demographic and genetic studies to unravel fragmentation effects: a case study of the native bush rat. Pages 172–201 in A. G. Young and G. M. Clarke, editors. Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Luikart, G. and , P. England. 1999. Statistical analysis of microsatellite DNA data. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:253–256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luoma, D. L., J. M. Trappe, A. W. Claridge, K. M. Jacobs, and E. Cazares, 2003. Relationships among fungi and small mammals in forested ecosystems. Pages 343–373 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Manel, S., , P. Berthier, and , G. Luikart. 2002. Detecting wildlife poaching: identifying the origin of individuals with Bayesian assignment tests and multi-locus genotypes. Conservation Biology 16:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manel, S., M. K. Schwartz, G. Luikart, and P. Taberlet. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, in press
Martin, K. J. and W. C. McComb. 2003. Small mammals in a landscape mosaic: implications for conservation. Pages 567–586 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
McKelvey, K., K. B. Aubry, and Y. K. Ortega. 2000. History and distribution of lynx in the contiguous United States. Pages 207–264 in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, G. M. Koehler, C. J. Krebs, K. S. McKelvey, and J. R. Squires editors. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. University of Colorado Press, Denver, Colorado, USA
Mills, L. S. 1995. Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conservation Biology 9:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, L. S. 1996. Fragmentation of a natural area: dynamics of isolation for small mammals on forest remnants. Pages 199–219 in G. Wright, editor. National Parks and Protected Areas: their Role in Environmental Protection. Blackwell Press, Oxford, UK. 470 pages
Mills, L. S. and , F. W. Allendorf. 1996. The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conservation Biology 10:1509–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, L. S. and D. A. Tallmon. 1999. The role of genetics in understanding forest fragmentation. Pages 171–186 in J. A. Rochelle, L. A. Lehmann, and J. Wisniewski, editors. Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife and Management Implications. Brill, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Mills, L. S., , J. J. Citta, , K. Lair, , M. Schwartz, , D. and Tallmon, . 2000a. Estimating animal abundance using non-invasive DNA sampling: promise and pitfalls. Ecological Applications 10:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, L. S., , K. L. Pilgrim, , M. K. Schwartz, and , K. McKelvey. 2000b. Identifying lynx and other North American felids based on mtDNA analysis. Conservation Genetics 1:285–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, G., K. G. Poole, and M. O'Donoghue. 2000. Ecology of lynx in northern Canada and Alaska. Pages 285–307 in L. F. Ruggiero, K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, G. M. Koehler, C. J. Krebs, K. S. McKelvey, and J. R. Squires editors. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. University of Colorado Press, Denver, Colorado, USA
Neigel, J. L. 1996. Estimation of effective population size and migration parameters from genetic data. Pages 329–346 in T. Smith, and R. Wayne, editors. Molecular Conservation Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Newman, D. and , D. A Tallmon. 2001. Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conservation Biology 15:1054–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. D. and C. J. Coffman. 1999. Demographic parameter estimation for experimental landscape studies on small mammal populations. Pages 287–309 in G. W. Barrett and J. D. Peles, editors. Landscape Ecology of Small Mammals. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA
Nicholson, A. J. and , V. A. Bailey. 1935. The balance of animal populations. Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 3:551–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. B., , P. Bentzen, , M. A. Banks, , J. B. Shaklee, and , S. Young. 2000. Microsatellites reveal population identity of individual pink salmon to allow supportive breeding of a population at risk of extinction. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:232–2422.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paetkau, D., , W. Calvert, , I. Stirling, and , C. Strobeck. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4:347–354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paetkau, D., , S. C. Amstrup, , E. W. Born, , W. Calvert, , A. E. Derocher, , G. W. Garner, , F. Messier, , I. Stirling, , M. K. Taylor, , O Wiig, and , C. Strobeck. 1999. Genetic structure of the world's polar bear populations. Molecular Ecology 8:1571–1584CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacock, M. M. 1997. Determining natal dispersal patterns in a population of North American pikas (Ochotona princeps) using direct mark-resight and indirect genetic methods. Behavioral Ecology 8:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pease, C. M., , R. Lande, and , J. J. Bull. 1989. A model of population growth, dispersal, and evolution in a changing environment. Ecology 70:1657–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. A., , M. P. Amaranthus, , J. G. Borchers, , S. L. Borchers, and , R. E. Brainerd. 1989. Bootstrapping in ecosystems. Bioscience 39:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, K. H. 1982. A capture-recapture design robust to unequal probability of capture. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:757–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, K. H., , J. D. Nichols, , C. Brownie, and , J. E. Hines. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107:1–107Google Scholar
Powell, L. A., , M. J. Conroy, , J. E. Hines, , J. D. Nichols, and , D. G. Krementz. 2000. Simultaneous use of mark-recapture and radiotelemetry to estimate survival, movement, and capture rates. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:302–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, J. K., , M. Stephens, and , P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google ScholarPubMed
Proctor, M. F., McLellan, B. N., and , C. Strobeck. 2003. Population fragmentation of grizzly bears in southeastern British Columbia, Canada. Ursus 13:153–160Google Scholar
Rannala, B. and , J. L. Mountain. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94:9197–9201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roach, J. L., , P. Stapp, , B. Van Horne, and , M. F. Antolin. 2001. Genetic structure of a metapopulation of black-tailed prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 82:946-9592.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, D. K., , K. A. Swindle, and , R. G. Anthony. 1994. Habitat associations of California red-backed voles in young and old-growth forests in Western Oregon. Northwest Science 68:266–272Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. K., , B. R. Noon, and , C. Meslow. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function and efficacy. BioScience 47:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousset, F. and , M. Raymond. 1997. Statistical analyses of population genetic data: new tools, old concepts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:313–317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggiero, L. F., K. B. Aubry, S. W. Buskirk, G. M. Koehler, C. J. Krebs, K. S. McKelvey, K. and J. R. Squires. 2000. Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States. University of Colorado Press, Denver, Colorado, USA. 480 pages
Schwartz, M. K., , D. A. Tallmon, and , G. H. Luikart. 1998. Review of DNA-based census and effective population size estimators. Animal Conservation 1:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. K., , L. S. Mills, , K. S. McKelvey, , L. F. Ruggiero, and , F. W. Allendorf. 2002. DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx. Nature 415:520–522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M. K., L. S. Mills, Y. Ortega, L. Ruggiero, and F. W. Allendorf. 2003. Landscape location affects genetic variation of Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis). Molecular Ecology, in press
Simberloff, D., , J. A. Farr, , J. Cox, and , D. W. Mehlman. 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments?Conservation Biology 6:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, F. J., , M. E. Moses, , S. Bellew, and , W. Sloan. 2000. Correlates to colonizations of new patches by translocated populations of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology 8:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462Google ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. and , N. H. Barton. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349–1369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slough, B. G. and , G. Mowat. 1996. Population dynamics of lynx in a refuge and interactions between harvested and unharvested populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:946–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E. and M. E. Gilpin. 1991. The theory of wildlife corridor capability. Pages 3–8 in D. A. Saunders and R. J. Hobbs, editors. Nature Conservation 2: the Role of Corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons: Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia
Spendelow, J. A., , J. D. Nichols, , I. C. T. Nisbet, , H. Hays, , G. D. Cormons, , J. Burger, , C. Safina, , J. E. Hines, and , M. Gochfeld. 1995. Estimating annual survival and movement rates of adults within a metapopulation of roseate terns. Ecology 76:2415–2428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spong, G. and , S. Creel. 2001. Deriving dispersal distances from genetic data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:2571–2574CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, E. K. and C. E. Jordan. 1997. Using molecular genetics to learn about the ecology of threatened species: the allure and the illusion of measuring genetic structure in natural populations Pages 440–460 in P. Fiedler and P. Kareiva, editors. Conservation Biology for the Coming Decade. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA
Sunnucks, P. 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:199–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taberlet, P. and , G. Luikart. 1999. Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taberlet, P., , L. P. Waits, and , G. Luikart. 1999. Non-invasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallmon, D. A., , H. Draheim, , L. S. Mills, and , F. W. Allendorf. 2002. Insights into recently fragmented vole populations from combined genetic and demographic data. Molecular Ecology 11:699–707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, B. L., , S. J. Chivers, , S. Sexton, and , A. E. Dizon. 2000. Evaluating dispersal estimates using mtDNA data: comparing analytical and simulation approaches. Conservation Biology 14:1287–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. D., , L. Fahrig, , K. Henein, and , G. Merriam. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tevis, L. 1956. Responses of small mammal populations to logging of Douglas-fir. Journal of Mammalogy 37:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA. 2001. National Forest System Road Management Strategy, Environmental Assessment and Civil Rights Impact Analysis. January 2001 Forest Service, Washington Office
Varvio, S., , R. Chakraborty, and , M. Nei. 1986. Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics. Heredity 57:189–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vitalis, R. and , D. Couvet. 2001. Estimation of effective population size and migration rate from one- and two-locus identity measures. Genetics 157:911–925Google ScholarPubMed
Vucetich, J. A. and , T. A. Waite. 2000. Is one migrant per generation sufficient for the genetic management of fluctuating populations?Animal Conservation 3:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waits, J. L. and , P. L. Leberg. 1999. Advances in the use of molecular markers for studies of population size and movement. Transactions of the 64b North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 1:191–201Google Scholar
Waits, J. L. and , P. L. Leberg. 2000. Biases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging. Animal Conservation 3:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionary significant units and conservation of biological diversity under the endangered species act. Pages 8–27 in J. L. Nielsen, editor. Evolution of the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda Maryland, USA
Waser, P. M. and , C. Strobeck. 1998. Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:43–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, M. S., , P. M. Marra, , S. M. Haig, , S. Bensch, and , R. T. Holmes. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Research in Ecology and Evolution 17:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. C. and , K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 [Supplement]120–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitlock, M. C. and , D. E. McCauley. 1999. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst c 1/(4Nm d 1). Heredity 82:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. O. An evolutionary and behavioral perspective on dispersal and colonization of mammals in fragmented landscapes. Pages 614–630 in C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, editors. Mammal Community Dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Woods, J. G., , D. Paetkau, , D. Lewis, , B. N. McLellan, , M. Proctor, and , C. Strobeck. 1999. Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:616–627Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–259Google ScholarPubMed
Zager, P., , L. S. Mills, , W. Wakkinen, and , D. A. Tallmon. 1995. Woodland caribou: a conservation dilemma. ESA Update 12:1–4Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×