Shaw, B. and Kelly, R., What is corrosion? Interface, Electrochem. Soc., Spring (2006), 24–26.Google Scholar

Duquette, D. and Schafrik, R., Research Opportunities in Corrosion Science and Engineering (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Song, G.-L., The grand challenges in electrochemical corrosion research. Front. Mater, 1 (2014), 2.Google Scholar

Frankel, G., Electrochemical techniques in corrosion: status, limitations, and needs. J. ASTM Int., 5 (2008), 1–27.Google Scholar

De Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.Google Scholar

Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E., Aguiar, J. A., Arslan, I. and Browning, N. D., Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 621–627.Google Scholar

Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruna, H. D. and Muller, D. A., In situ electron energy loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 1027–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Unocic, R. R., Baggetto, L., Unocic, K. et al., Coupling EELS/EFTEM imaging with environmental fluid cell microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1104–1105.Google Scholar

Zaluzec, N. J., Burke, M. G., Haigh, S. J. and Kulzick, M. A., X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry during in situ liquid cell studies using an analytical electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 323–329.Google Scholar

Schilling, S., Janssen, A., Zhong, Z. L., Zaluzec, N. J. and Burke, M. J., Liquid in situ analytical electron microscopy: examining SCC precursor events for Type 304 stainless steel in H2O. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 1291–1292.Google Scholar

McCafferty, E., Introduction to Corrosion Science (New York: Springer, 2010).Google Scholar

Frankel, G. and Sridhar, N., Understanding localized corrosion. Mater. Today, 11 (2008), 38–44.Google Scholar

Frankel, G., Pitting corrosion of metals. J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998), 2186–2198.Google Scholar

Soltis, J., Passivity breakdown, pit initiation and propagation of pits in metallic materials: review. Corros. Sci., 90 (2015), 5–22.Google Scholar

Accelerated dissolution of thin metal films had been observed during continuous imaging under the electron beam.Google Scholar

Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frankel, G. and Rohwerder, M., Electrochemical techniques for corrosion. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry (Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2007).Google Scholar

Kelly, R. G., Scully, J. R., Shoesmith, D. and Buchheit, R., Electrochemical Techniques in Corrosion Science and Engineering (New York: Marcel Dekker, 2013).Google Scholar

Frankel, G., Techniques for Corrosion Quantification in the Characterization of Materials, 2nd edn. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 850–864.Google Scholar

Keddam, M., Application of advanced electrochemical techniques and concepts to corrosion phenomena. Corrosion, 62 (2006), 1056–1066.Google Scholar

Frankel, G., The growth of 2-D pits in thin film aluminum. Corros. Sci., 30 (1990), 1203.Google Scholar

Balazs, L. and Gouyet, J., Two-dimensional pitting corrosion of aluminium thin layers. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl., 217 (1995), 319–338.Google Scholar

Frankel, G., Pit growth in thin metallic films. Mater. Sci. Forum, 247 (1997), 1–8.Google Scholar

Proost, J., Baklanov, M. and Verbeeck, R., Morphology of corrosion pits in aluminum thin film metallizations. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2 (1998), 150–155.Google Scholar

Hernandez, S., Griffin, A. Jr., Brotzen, F. and Dunn, C., The effect of thickness on the corrosion susceptibility of Al thin film metallizations. J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995), 1215–1220.Google Scholar

Zhao, Y.-P., Cheng, C.-F., Wang, G.-C. and Lu, T.-M., Characterization of pitting corrosion in aluminum films by light scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett., 73 (1998), 2432–2434.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W., Ross, F. M., Duquette, D. and Hull, R., Studies of corrosion of Al thin films using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. MRS Proc., 1525 (2013), mrsf12-1525-ss11-03.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W., Duquette, D. J., Ross, F. M. and Hull, R., Metastable structures in Al thin films before the onset of corrosion pitting as observed using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 462–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chee, S. W., Pratt, S. H., Hattar, K. et al., Studying localized corrosion using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 168–171.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Liquid cell TEM of the corrosion of metal films in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1110–1111.Google Scholar

Liao, H.-G., Niu, K. and Zheng, H., Observation of growth of metal nanoparticles. Chem. Commun., 49 (2013), 11720–11727.Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Zhu, G., Lin, F., Zhang, H. and Jin, C., In situ study of oxidative etching of palladium nanocrystals by liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 3761–3765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wu, J., Gao, W., Yang, H. and Zuo, J.-M., Imaging shape-dependent corrosion behavior of Pt nanoparticles over extended time using a liquid flow cell and TEM. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1508–1509.Google Scholar

Sutter, E., Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S. et al., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of silver-palladium galvanic replacement reactions on silver nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), 4946.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W., Park, J.-H., Pinkowitz, A. et al., Liquid cell TEM of Al thin film corrosion under potentiostatic polarization. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 973–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Park, J. H., Chee, S. W., Kodambaka, S. and Ross, F. M., In situ LC-TEM studies of corrosion of metal thin films in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 1291–1292.Google Scholar

Noh, K. W, Tai, K., Mao, S. and Dillon, S. J., Grain boundary parting limit during dealloying. Adv. Eng. Mater., 17 (2015), 157–161.Google Scholar

Mayer, J., Giannuzzi, L. A., Kamino, T. and Michael, J., TEM sample preparation and FIB-induced damage. MRS Bull., 32 (2007), 400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Unocic, R., Adamczyk, L., Dudney, N. et al., In-situ TEM characterization of electrochemical processes in energy storage systems. Microsc. Microanal., 17 (2011), 1564–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhong, X., Burke, M. G., Schilling, S., Haigh, S. J. and Zaluzec, N. J., Novel hybrid sample preparation method for in situ liquid cell TEM analysis. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1514–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woehl, T. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E. et al., Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. Ultramicroscopy, 127 (2013), 53–63.Google Scholar

Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.Google Scholar

Hoppe, S. M., Sasaki, D. Y., Kinghorn, A. N. and Hattar, K., In-situ transmission electron microscopy of liposomes in an aqueous environment. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 9958–9961.Google Scholar

Abellan, P., Woehl, T. J., Parent, L. R. et al., Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 4873–4880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klein, K. L., Anderson, I. M. and de Jonge, N., Transmission electron microscopy with a liquid flow cell. J. Microsc., 242 (2011), 117–123.Google Scholar

The liquid layer thicknesses quoted in atmospheric corrosion studies are normally in the tens of micrometers.Google Scholar

Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. and Unocic, R. R., In operando transmission electron microscopy imaging of SEI formation and structure in Li-ion and Li-metal batteries. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1598–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, N. M., Norton, M. M., Mendel, B. J. et al., Electron–water interactions and implications for liquid cell electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C., 118 (2014), 22373–22382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelm, M., Bohnert, E. and Pashalidis, I., Products formed from alpha radiolysis of chloride brines. Res. Chem. Intermed., 27 (2001), 503–507.Google Scholar

Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.Google Scholar

Schilling, S., Janssen, A., Burke, M. G. et al., In situ analytical electron microscopy: imaging and analysis of steel in liquid water. 18th International Microscopy Congress (2014), www.microscopy.cz/proceedings/all.html#abstract-2947.Google Scholar

Bi-metallic exposure in the electrolyte frequently leads to galvanic corrosion but the effects of coupled metals are not so straightforward. Depending on the metals that are connected, it is possible that the more active metal becomes more resistant to corrosion. The reader is referred to general texts on corrosion for clarification.Google Scholar

Park, J.-H., Reuter, M. C., Kodambaka, S. and Ross, F. M., Electric field induced Au nanocrystal formation in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1598–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoppe, S. M., Hernandez-Sanchez, B. A., Hattar, K. and Sasaki, D. Y., Progress towards in situ TEM of biofouling. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2012), 1132–1133.Google Scholar