Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:34:18.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2019

Inder S. Marwah
Inder S. Marwah
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Liberalism, Diversity and Domination
Kant, Mill and the Government of Difference
 , pp. 262 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Edward. Matthew Arnold and John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Alfred, Gerald Taiaiake. “Colonialism and State Dependency.” Journal of Aboriginal Health 5 (2009): 42–60.Google Scholar
Alfred, Gerald Taiaiake. “Restitution Is the Real Pathway to Justice for Indigenous Peoples.” In Response, Responsibility and Renewal: Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Journey, eds. Younging, Gregory, Dewar, Jonathan and Gagné, Mike, 179–187. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation, 2009.Google Scholar
Alfred, Taiaiake, and Corntassel, Jeff. “Being Indigenous: Resurgences against Contemporary Colonialism.” Government and Opposition 40 (2005): 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Amy. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. “Kant on Freedom: A Reply to My Critics.” Inquiry 36, no. 4 (1993): 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. “The Purposive Development of Human Capacities.” In Kant’s “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim”: A Critical Guide, eds. Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg and Schmidt, James, 46–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. Bleak Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lisa. “Bread, Dignity and Social Justice: Populism in the Arab World.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 478–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon. Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. “The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities.” Third World Quarterly 27, no. 5 (2006): 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Politics of Aristotle, ed. and trans. Barker, Ernest. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. “The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations.” Modern Intellectual History 1, no. 1 (2004): 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David “John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government.” Political Theory 32, no. 5 (2004): 602–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. “The Wild Indian’s Venison: Locke’s Theory of Property and English Colonialism in America.” Political Studies 44, no. 1 (1996): 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. “Disability, Self-Image and Modern Political Theory.” Political Theory 37, no. 2 (2009): 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, Barbara, and Hirschmann, Nancy, eds. Disability and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. “Democracy and Liberty in Mill’s Theory of Government.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20, no. 1 (1982): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. “Rawls versus Utilitarianism in the Light of Political Liberalism.” In The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls, eds. Davion, Victoria and Wolf, Clark, 231–252. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar
Azmanova, Albena. “The Populist Catharsis: On the Revival of the Political.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “Difference, Otherness, Exclusion.” Parallax 11, no. 1 (2005): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “Racism and Nationalism.” In Nations and Nationalism: A Reader, eds. Spencer, Philip and Wollman, Howard, 163–172. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence. “The Formation of Character: Mill’s ‘Ethology’ Reconsidered.” Polity 33, no. 1 (2000): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. “Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 412–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannerji, Himani. Dark Side of the Nation: Essays on Multiculturalism, Nationalism and Gender. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Baum, Bruce. Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Bruce. “J. S. Mill and Liberal Socialism.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 98–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Baum, Bruce. “Decolonizing Critical Theory.” Constellations 22, no. 3 (2015): 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret. “Autocracy and Autonomy.” Kant-Studien, 94 (2003): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, C. A. Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynes, John Kenneth. “Kant on Property Rights and the Social Contract.” The Monist 72 (1989): 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis W. “Kant and the Right of Revolution.” Journal of the History of Ideas 32, no. 3 (1971): 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis W. “Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant.” In Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festrschrift to Stephan Körner, ed. Srzednicki, Jan J. T.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. “Human Rights as a Common Concern.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 2 (2001): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life.” In Mill’s On Liberty in Focus, eds. Gray, John and Smith, G. W., 131–161. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. Liberalism, Nationalism, Citizenship: Essays on the Problem of Political Community. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. “Paradoxes in Kant’s Account of Citizenship.” In Responsibility in Context: Perspectives, ed. Ognjenovic, Gorana, 19–34. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. “Textualism: An Anti-Methodology.” In Political Theory: The State of the Discipline, ed. Sembou, Evangelia, 22–35. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “Mill on the Colonies.” Political Theory 38, no. 1 (2010): 34–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42, no. 6 (2014): 682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan. Reordering the World: Essays on Liberalism and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Peter. “Mill: Liberty, Virtue, and the Discipline of Individuality.” In Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism, ed. Eisenach, Eldon J., 13–48. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Another Cosmopolitanism: Hospitality, Sovereignty and Democratic Iterations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. “Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race.” In Race, 11–36. Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. “Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism.” In Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays, eds. Ward, Julie K. and Lee Lott, Tommy, 145–166. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. “Kant’s Third Thoughts on Race.” In Reading Kant’s Geography, eds. Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo, 291–318. New York: State University of New York Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Biagini, E. F. “Neo-Roman Liberalism: ‘Republican’ Values and British Liberalism, ca. 1860–1875.” History of European Ideas 29, no. 1 (2003): 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel. “Reflections on Three Populisms.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, Brett. “The Ebb and Flow of Peoples, Ideas and Innovations: Towards a Global History of Political Thought.” In Western Political Thought in Dialogue with Asia, eds. Shōgimen, Takashi and Nederman, Cary J., 87–108. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett. The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, David. “Liberalism Is Still Alive – It’s Neoliberalism That’s the Problem.” Guardian, October 3, 2016.Google Scholar
Boyraz, Cemil. “Neoliberal Populism and Governmentality in Turkey: The Foundation of Communication Centers during the AKP Era.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxill, Bernard R. Race and Racism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Boxill, Bernard R., and Hill, Thomas, “Kant and Race.” In Race and Racism, 448–471. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. “The Guiding Idea of Kant’s Anthropology and the Vocation of the Human Being.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 85–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Reinhard. “The Vocation of the Human Being,” in Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 85–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. G. “Millian Liberalism and Colonial Oppression.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1999): 79–97.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, Bruce. “Enlightened Histories: Civilization, War and the Scottish Enlightenment.” The European Legacy 10, no. 2 (2005): 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. H. “J. S. Mill and Democracy, 1829–61.” Political Studies 5, no. 2 (1957): 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Barbara. Imperialism and Postcolonialism. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2006.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. “The Libertarian Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Reason Papers 9 (1983): 3–19.Google Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas. John Stuart Mill: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Janice. John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Janice. “Mr. John Stuart Mill, M.P., and the Character of the Working Classes.” In Mill and the Moral Character of Liberalism, ed. Eisenach, Eldon, 143–168. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Carson, Penelope. “Golden Casket or Pebbles and Trash? J. S. Mill and the Anglicist/Orientalist Controversy.” In J. S. Mill’s Encounter with India, eds. Moir, Martin I., Peers, Douglas M. and Zastoupil, Lynn, 149–172. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Caswell, Matthew. “Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good, the Gesinnung, and the Theory of Radical Evil.” Kant Studien 97, no. 2 (2006): 184–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Chibber, Vivek. Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Ciccariello-Maher, George. Decolonizing Dialectics. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Cobbe, Frances Power. “Criminals, Idiots, Women and Minors.” Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 78 (1868): 1–27.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Kant on Epigenesis, Monogenesis and Human Nature: The Biological Premises of Anthropology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (2006): 675–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Alix. Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. ed. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Kant on the Moral Cultivation of Feelings.” In Thinking about the Emotions: A Philosophical History, eds. Cohen, Alix and Stern, Robert, 172–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Rational Feelings.” In Kant and the Faculty of Feeling, eds. Sorensen, K. and Williamson, D., 9–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix. “Kant on Moral Feelings, Moral Desires and the Cultivation of Virtue.” In Begehren/Desire, eds. Sedgwick, Sally and Emundts, Dina, 3–18. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “On the Constitution of Church and State.” In The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coldridge, Volume 10: On the Constitution of Church and State, ed. Colmer, John. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan. “The Idea of Character in Victorian Political Thought.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 35 (1985): 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. Capitalism and Christianity, American-Style. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Conway, Janet, and Singh, Jakeet, “Radical Democracy in Global Perspective: Notes from the Pluriverse.” Third World Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Frederick. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Frederick “Postcolonial Studies and the Study of History.” In Postcolonial Studies and Beyond, eds. Loomba, Ania, Kaul, Suvir, Bunzl, Matti and Burton, Antoinette, 401–422. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Frederick, and Stoler, Ann Laura, eds. Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Vincent M. “Kant, Teleology, and Sexual Ethics.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31, no. 1 (1991): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Glen. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowling, Maurice. Mill and Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummiskey, David. “Justice and Revolution in Kant’s Political Philosophy.” In Rethinking Kant, Volume I, ed. Muchnik, Pablo, 217–240. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara. “Individual and Collective Flourishing in Kant’s Philosophy.” Kantian Review 13, no. 1 (2008): 82–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desch, Michael C. “Benevolent Cant? Kant’s Liberal Imperialism.” Review of Politics 73, no. 4 (2011): 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devigne, Robert. Reforming Liberalism: J. S. Mill’s Use of Ancient, Religious, Liberal, and Romantic Moralities. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita. Identity/Difference Politics: How Difference Is Produced and Why It Matters. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John, 255–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill on Education and Democracy.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 250–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill and Virtue Ethics.” In John Stuart Mill: Thought and Influence – The Saint of Rationalism, eds. Varouxakis, Georgios and Kelly, Paul, 84–98. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy and Fullerton, Richard A.. Mill. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dossa, Shiraz. “Liberal Imperialism? Natives, Muslims and Others.” Political Theory 30, no. 5 (2002): 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk. London: Penguin, 1996.Google Scholar
Duncan, Graeme. Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. “The Identity of the History of Ideas.” Philosophy 43, no. 164 (1968): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussel, Enrique. Philosophy of Liberation. Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Dussel, Enrique. “Eurocentrism and Modernity.” Boundary 2 20, no. 3 (1993): 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale and Weinstein, David, eds. John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ellis, Elisabeth. Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ellis, Elisabeth. “Citizenship and Property Rights: A New Look at Social Contract Theory.” The Journal of Politics 68, no. 3 (2006): 544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Meditations on Modern Political Thought: Masculine/Feminine Themes from Luther to Arendt. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Stephen G. “Mill, Bentham, and the Art and Science of Government.” Revue d’études Benthamiennes 4 (2008).Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, no. 4 (1992): 747–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. “The Color of Reason: The Idea of ‘Race’ in Kant’s Anthropology.” In Anthropology and the German Enlightenment: Perspectives on Humanity, ed. Faull, Katherine M., 201–241. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kennan. William James: Politics in the Pluriverse. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World. London: Penguin, 2004.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. “Can Political Liberalism Help Us Rescue ‘the People’ from Populism?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, Graham. “Power and Development: John Stuart Mill and Edmund Burke on Empire.” In Postcolonialism and Political Theory, ed. Persram, Nalini, 57–75. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. “Metaphysics and Physiology in Kant’s Attitudes Towards Theories of Preformation.” In Kant’s Theory of Biology, eds. Watkins, Eric and Goy, Ina, 25–42. Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin.“Reason, Right and Revolution: Kant and Locke.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36, no. 4 (2008): 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin, and Ypi, Lea, eds. Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au College de France (1978–1979). Paris: Seuil, 2004.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “What Is Enlightenment?” In The Politics of Truth, eds. Lotringer, Sylvère and Rajchman, John, 97–120. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2007.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. “All Politics Must Bend Its Knee Before Right.” Social Theory and Practice 34, no. 2 (2008):157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. “Kant’s Empirical Account of Human Action.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5, no. 7 (2005): 1–34.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. “Character and Evil.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44, no. 4 (2006): 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. “Moral Personality and Liberal Theory: John Rawls’s ‘Dewey Lectures’.” Political Theory 10, no. 4 (1982): 492–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. “Realism in Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. “Anthropology: the ‘Original’ of Human Nature.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Broadie, Alexander. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald and Cortland, Shane, “Liberalism.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, December 22, 2014, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/.Google Scholar
Getachew, Adom. “Universalism after the Post-Colonial Turn: Interpreting the Haitian Revolution.” Political Theory, doi: 10.1177/0090591716661018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, John. “J. S. Mill, Liberalism, and Progress.” In Victorian Liberalism: Nineteenth-Century Political Thought and Practice, ed. Bellamy, Richard, 91–109. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Goldberg, David Theo. Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Goldberg, David Theo. “Liberalism’s Limits: Carlyle and Mill on ‘The Negro Question’.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 22 (2000): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, Michael, and Morefield, Jeanne. “Reflection Now! Critique and Solidarity in the Trump Era.” Theory & Event 20 (2017): 68–85.Google Scholar
Gray, John, Mill on Liberty: A Defence. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Gray, John “Mill’s Conception of Happiness and the Theory of Individuality.” In J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in Focus, eds. Gray, John and Smith, G. W. (London: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar
Grcic, Joseph. “Kant on Revolution and Economic Inequality.” Kant-Studien 77, no. 4 (1986): 447–457.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Deductions of the Principles of Right.” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark, 23–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Beauty, Systematicity, and the Highest Good: Eckart Förster’s Kant’s Final Synthesis.” Inquiry 46, no. 2 (2003): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The Obligation to Be Virtuous: Kant’s Conception of the Tugendverpflichtung.” Social Philosophy & Policy 27, no. 2 (2010): 206–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. Traditions of Liberalism: Essays on John Locke, Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill. St. Leonards: Center for Independent Studies, 1988.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace: At Two Hundred Years’ Historical Remove.” In The Inclusion of the Other, eds. Cronin, Ciaran and de Greiff, Pablo, 165–202. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen The Postnational Constellation, ed. and trans. Pensky, Max. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Habibi, Don. “The Moral Dimension of J. S. Mill’s Colonialism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 30, no. 1 (1999): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibi, Don. John Stuart Mill and the Ethic of Human Growth. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “When Was ‘the Postcolonial’? Thinking at the Limit.” In The Post-Colonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons, eds. Chambers, I. and Curtis, L., 242–260. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Joseph. John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A. “Liberalism.” In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas, 119–151. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Mises, Ludwig. Liberalism in the Classical Tradition, trans. Raico, Ralph. New York: Foundation for Economic Education, 1985.Google Scholar
von Hayek, Friedrich A. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Todd. “Race, Difference, and Anthropology in Kant’s Cosmopolitanism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Burke. “The Political Dangers of Western Philosophical Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Peoples’ Politics, eds. Lucero, Jose Antonio, Turner, Dale and VanCott, Donna Lee. Published online January 2013, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195386653.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Burke, and Baumgold, Deborah, eds. Colonial Exchanges: Political Theory and the Agency of the Colonized. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “A Cosmopolitan Kingdom of Ends.” In Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, eds. Reath, rews, Herman, Barbara and Korsgaard, Christine, 187–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “Training to Autonomy.” In Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives, ed. Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, 255–272. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. “Making Sense of Liberal Imperialism.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 319–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpfl, H. M. “From Savage to Scotsman: Conjectural History in the Scottish Enlightenment.” Journal of British Studies 17, no. 2 (1978): 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Horton, John. “Realism, Liberal Moralism and a Political Theory of Modus Vivendi.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospers, John. Libertarianism: A Political Philosophy for Tomorrow. Los Angeles: Nash Publishing, 1971.Google Scholar
Huneman, Philippe, ed. Understanding Purpose: Kant and the Philosophy of Biology. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idris, Murad. War for Peace: Genealogies of a Violent Ideal in Western and Islamic Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. “The American Empire; the Burden.” New York Times Magazine, January 5, 2003.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. Empire Lite: Nation-Building in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan. Toronto: Penguin Canada, 2006.Google Scholar
Ingram, James. Radical Cosmopolitics: The Ethics and Politics of Democratic Universalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ivison, Duncan. Postcolonial Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ivison, Duncan. “Locke, Liberalism and Empire.” In The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, ed. Anstey, Peter R., 86–105. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Brian. “Kantian Character and the Problem of a Science of Humanity.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 105–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, eds. Essays on Kant’s Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Beate. “Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill.” Review of International Studies, 31 (2005): 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Beate. “Kant, Mill and Illiberal Legacies.” International Organization 59, no. 1 (2005): 177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justman, Stewart. The Hidden Text of Mill’s Library. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1990.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. London: Macmillan and co, 1953.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment, ed. and trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J., 311–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J., 133–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J., 37–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary J., 353–604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J., 273–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Toward Perpetual Peace.” In Practical Philosophy, ed. Gregor, Mary J., 311–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics, eds. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, ed. Louden, Robert B.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: And Other Writings, eds. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Conjectural Beginning of Human History.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 160–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Determination of the Concept of a Human Race.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 143–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Essays Regarding the Philanthropium.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 98–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 107–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Lectures on Pedagogy.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 434–485. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 18–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Of the Different Races of Human Beings.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 82–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 192–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Review of J. G. Herder’s Ideas for the Philosophy of the History of Humanity. Parts 1 and 2.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 121–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Anthropology Busolt.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Allen, W. Wood and Louden, Robert B., 511–524. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Anthropology Friedländer.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Allen, W. Wood and Louden, Robert B., 37–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Anthropology Mrongovius.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B., 339–509. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Anthropology Parow.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B., 27–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Anthropology Pillau.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B., 257–278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel.Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “Menschenkunde.” In Lectures on Anthropology, eds. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B., 281–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel.Physical Geography. In Natural Science, ed. Watkins, Eric, 434–678. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Kapila, Shruti, ed. An Intellectual History for India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kateb, George. “A Reading of On Liberty.” In On Liberty, eds. Bromwich, David and Kateb, George, 28–66. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelly, Paul, and Varouxakis, Georgios. “John Stuart Mill’s Thought and Legacy: A Timely Reappraisal.” In John Stuart Mill: Thought and Influence – The Saint of Rationalism, eds. Varouxakis, Georgios and Kelly, Paul. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang. “Politics, Freedom and Order: Kant’s Political Philosophy.” The Cambridge Companion to Kant, 342–366. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, Martin. “Brexit Was a Revolt against Liberalism. We’ve Entered a New Political Era.” Guardian, September 15, 2016.Google Scholar
Kinzer, Bruce L., Robson, Ann P., and Robson, John M., A Moralist In and Out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–1868. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant.” The Philosophical Forum XXV (1993): 134–150.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “What Do the Virtuous Hope For? Re-Reading Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, ed. Robinson, Hoke, 91–112. Memphis: Marquette University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Cosmopolitan Law: World Citizenship for a Global Order.” Kantian Review 2 (1998): 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, no. 1 (1999): 59–80.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kantian Patriotism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29, no. 4 (2000): 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race.” The Philosophical Quarterly 57, no. 226 (2007): 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Debunking Confabulation: Emotions and the Significance of Empirical Psychology for Kantian Ethics.” In Kant on Emotion and Value, ed. Cohen, A., 146–165. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Second Thoughts on Colonialism.” In Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives, eds. Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea, 43–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, Cornelia. “The Concepts of the Sublime and the Beautiful in Kant and Lyotard.” In Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott, Robin May, 191–211. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Koditschek, Theodore. Liberalism, Imperialism, and the Historical Imagination: Nineteenth-Century Visions of a Greater Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kofman, Sarah. “The Economy of Respect: Kant and Respect for Women.” Social Research 49, no. 2 (1982): 383–404.Google Scholar
Kohn, Margaret and O’Neill, Daniel. “A Tale of Two Indias: Burke and Mill on Empire and Slavery in the West Indies and America.” Political Theory 34, no. 2 (2006): 192–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution.” In The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology, 233–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. “Natural Motives and the Motive of Duty: Hume and Kant on Our Duties to Others.” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 1, no. 2 (2009): 9–36.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. “Introduction.” In Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View by Kant, Immanuel, ed. Louden, Robert B., viii–xxix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kurfirst, Robert. “Mill on Oriental Despotism, Including Its British Variant.” Utilitas, 8 no. 1 (1996): 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality.” Ethics 99, no. 4 (1989): 883–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
La Vopa, Anthony J. “Thinking about Marriage: Kant’s Liberalism and the Peculiar Morality of Conjugal Union.” The Journal of Modern History 77, no. 1 (2005): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. “Political Liberalism.” Political Theory 18, no. 3 (1990): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrimore, Mark. “Sublime Waste: Kant on the Destiny of the ‘Races’.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1999): 99–125.Google Scholar
Larrimore, Mark. “Antinomies of Race: Diversity and Destiny in Kant.” Patterns of Prejudice 42, nos. 4–5 (2008): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laski, Harold. The Rise of Liberalism: The Philosophy of a Business Civilization. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1936.Google Scholar
Levin, Michael. J. S. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Alexander. “Moralism and Its Discontents.” Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development 7, no. 3 (2016): 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Losurdo, Domenico. Liberalism: A Counter-History. London: Verso, 2011.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. “The Second Part of Morals.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 60–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Robert B. “General Introduction.” In History, Anthropology, Education by Kant, Immanuel, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. “Introduction.” In Lectures on Pedagogy by Kant, Immanuel, eds. Zöller, Günter and Louden, Robert B., 434–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Mill on Government.” In The Miscellaneous Writings of Lord Macaulay. Vol. 1, 282–323. London: Longman, Green and Co., 1860.Google Scholar
Majeed, Javed. “James Mill’s The History of British India: A Reevaluation.” In J. S. Mill’s Encounter with India, eds. Martin, I. Moir, Peers, Douglas M. and Zastoupil, Lynn, 53–71. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Majeed, Javed. “James Mill’s The History of British India: The Question of Utilitarianism and Empire.” In Utilitarianism and Empire, eds. Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, 93–106. Lanham: Lexington Book, 2005.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. “Mill and the Imperial Predicament.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 298–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. “Unexpected Paths: On Political Theory and Method.” Theory & Event 19, no. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Marwah, Inder S. “Bridging Nature and Freedom? Kant, Culture and Cultivation.” Social Theory and Practice 38, no. 3 (2012): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwah, Inder S. “Elateres Motiva: From the Good Will to the Good Human Being.” Kantian Review, 18 no. 3 (2013): 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwah, Inder S. “Liberal Theory.” In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, eds. Michael, T. Gibbons, Diana, Coole, Elisabeth, Ellis and Kennan, Ferguson, 2134–2139. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwah, Inder S. “Rethinking Resistance: Spencer, Krishnavarma and The Indian Sociologist.” In Colonial Exchanges: Political Theory and the Agency of the Colonized, eds. Hendrix, Burke and Baumgold, Deborah, 43–72. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marwah, Inder S. “Provincializing Progress: Developmentalism and Anti-Imperialism in Colonial India.” Polity, forthcoming 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazlish, Bruce. James and John Stuart Mill: Father and Son in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Basic Books, 1975.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. “Multicultural Cosmopolitanism: Remarks on the Idea of Universal History.” In Letting Be: Fred Dallmayr’s Cosmopolitical Vision, ed. Schneck, Stephen, 88–113. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, James. “The New Liberal Conception of the State.” In The New Liberalism: Reconciling Liberty and Community, eds. Simonhy, Abital and Weinstein, David, 115–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh. “Liberal Strategies of Exclusion.” Politics and Society 18, no. 4 (1990): 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Uday Singh. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendieta, Eduardo. “Geography Is to History as Woman Is to Man: Kant on Sex, Race, and Geography.” In Reading Kant’s Geography, eds. Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo, 345–368. Albany: SUNY Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. “From Crooked Wood to Moral Agency: On Anthropology and Ethics in Kant.” Estudos Kantianos 2, no. 1 (2014): 185–203.Google Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. “What’s Wrong with Inevitable Progress? Notes on Kant’s Anthropology Today.” Cogent Arts and Humanities 4 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Skull Collectors: German Anthropology from Blumenbach to Kant.” In Kant and His German Contemporaries. Volume 1, Logic, Mind, Epistemology, Science and Ethics, eds. Dyck, W. and Wunderlich, F., 192–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas R. Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mendus, Susan. “Kant: ‘an Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois’?” In Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Williams, Howard, 166–190. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. “The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis: Border Thinking and Critical Cosmopolitanism.” Public Culture 12, no. 3 (2000): 721–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, James. “Government”, Reprinted from Supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica. London: J. Innes, 1825.Google Scholar
Mill, James. History of British India in 6 Volumes. London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy, 1826.Google Scholar
Mill, James. “An Essay on Government.” In Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill’s “Essay on Government,” Macaulay’s Critique, and the Ensuing Debate, eds. Lively, Jack and Rees, J. C., 53–96. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “Mill to Edward Lytton Bulwer, Nov. 23, 1836.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, eds. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to Gustave d’Eichthal, Oct. 8 1829.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to John Sterling, Oct. 20–22, 1831.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to Gustave d’Eichthal, Oct. 8, 1829.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to Gustave d’Eichthal, Nov. 7, 1829.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to Gustave d’Eichthal, May 15, 1829.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, ed. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to John Pringle Nichol, Apr. 15, 1834.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XII – The Earlier Letters 1812–1848 Part I, eds. Mineka, Francis E.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart Principles of Political Economy. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume III – Principles of Political Economy Part II, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume IV – Essays on Economics and Society Part I, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart August Comte and Positivism. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (Utilitarianism), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Bentham.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (Utilitarianism), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Coleridge.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (Utilitarianism), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart Utilitarianism. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X – Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society (Utilitarianism), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to George Cornewall Lewis, March 20, 1859.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XV – The Later Letters 1849–1873 Part II, eds. Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to Henry Jones.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVI – The Later Letters 1849–1873 Part III, eds. Francis, E. Mineka and Lindley, Dwight N.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Mill to John Morley, Nov. 4, 1865.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVI – The Later Letters 1849–1873 Part III, eds. Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume VIII – A System of Logic Part II, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart Considerations on Representative Government. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIX – Essays on Politics and Society Part II, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Civilization.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [1].” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “De Tocqueville on Democracy in America [2].” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart On Liberty. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part 1 (On Liberty), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Rationale of Representation.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I (On Liberty), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “State of Society in America.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XVIII – Essays on Politics and Society Part I, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIX – Essays on Politics and Society Part II, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart Autobiography. In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume I – Autobiography and Literary Essays, eds. Robson, John M. and Stillinger, Jack. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “A Few Words on Non-Intervention.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI – Essays on Equality, Law, and Education (Subjection of Women), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Inaugural Address Delivered to the University of St. Andrews 1867.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI – Essays on Equality, Law, and Education, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Subjection of Women.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI – Essays on Equality, Law, and Education (Subjection of Women), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Vindication of the French Revolution of February 1848–1849.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XX – Essays on French History and Historians, ed. John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Municipal Institutions The Examiner, 11 Aug. 1833.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIII – Newspaper Writings Part II, eds. Ann, P. Robson and John, M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Romilly’s Public Responsibility and the Ballot Reader.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXV – Newspaper Writings Part IV, eds. Ann, P. Robson and Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Spirit of the Age, III.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds. Ann, P. Robson and Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “James Mill’s Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXXI – Miscellaneous Writings, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Petition of the East India Company.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXX – Writings on India, eds. John, M. Robson, Moir, Martin, and Moir, Zawahir. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1990.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Negro Question.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXI – Essays on Equality, Law, and Education (Subjection of Women), ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: Toronto University Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Guizot’s Essays and Lectures on History.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XX – Essays on French History and Historians, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Michelet’s History of France.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XX – Essays on French History and Historians, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Civil War in the United States, Our Daily Fare, 21 June, 1864.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXV – Newspaper Writings Part IV, eds. Ann, P. Robson and Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The English National Character.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXIII – Newspaper Writings Part II, eds. Ann P. Robson and John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Parliamentary Reform, Morning Chronicle, 3 October, 1823” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds., Robson, John M., and Robson, Ann P.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Practicability of Reform in the Law, Morning Chronicle, 8 October, 1813.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds., Robson, John M., and Robson, Ann P.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Securities for Good Government, Morning Chronicle, 25 September, 1823.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds. John, M. Robson, and Robson, Ann P.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “The Spirit of the Age, V (Part 2).” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds. Robson, Ann P. and Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Technicalities of English Law, Morning Chronicle, 25 September, 1823.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXII – Newspaper Writings Part I, eds. Robson, John M., and Robson, Ann P.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart “Representation of the People, 13 April 1866.” In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXVIII – Public and Parliamentary Speeches Part I, eds. Kinzer, Bruce L. and Robson, John M., 74–75. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millgram, Elijah. “Liberty, the Higher Pleasures, and Mill’s Missing Science of Ethnic Jokes.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 26, no. 1 (2009): 326–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millgram, Elijah “Mill’s Incubus.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, eds. Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale E. and Weinstein, David, 169–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. The Racial Contract. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Ideal Theory as Ideology.” In Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, eds. DesAutels, Peggy and Walker, Margaret Urban, 163–181. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Racial Liberalism.” PMLA 123 (2008): 1380–1397.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Kant’s Untermenschen.” In Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy, ed. Valls, Andrew, 169–193. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Kant and Race, Redux.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 35, nos. 1–2 (2014): 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Racial Equality.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, ed. Hull, George, 43–72. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Decolonizing Western Political Philosophy.” New Political Science 37, no. 1 (2015): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. W. Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. W. “Black Radical Kantianism.” Res Philosophica 95 (2018): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Jon M., ed. and trans. Kant and the Concept of Race: Late Eighteenth-Century Writings. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Dale E. “John Stuart Mill’s Civic Liberalism.” History of Political Thought 21, no. 1 (2000): 88–113.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale E. John Stuart Mill: Moral, Social and Political Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale E. “The Place of Plural Voting in Mill’s Conception of Representative Government.” The Review of Politics 77, no. 3 (2015): 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James. The Passion of Michel Foucault. London: Flamingo, 1993.Google Scholar
Miller, Joseph J. “J. S. Mill on Plural Voting, Competence and Participation.” History of Political Thought 24, no. 4 (2003): 647–667,Google Scholar
Miller, Joseph J. “Chairing the Jamaica Committee: J. S. Mill and the Limits of Colonial Authority.” In Utilitarianism and Empire, eds. Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, 155–178. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Moir, Martin. “Introduction.” In Stuart Mill, John, The Collected Writings of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXX – Writings on India, eds. Moir, Zawahir, Moir, Martin and Robinson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1990.Google Scholar
Moir, Martin, Peers, Douglas M. and Zastoupil, Lynn, eds, J. S. Mill’s Encounter with India. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morefield, Jeanne. Empires without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, John. The Life of William Ewart Gladstone. London: Macmillan, 1903.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, and Sartori, Andrew, eds. Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristobal Rovira. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulholland, Leslie A. Kant’s System of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas. Kant’s Conception of Moral Character: The “Critical” Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas. “Indispensable Education of the Being of Reason and Speech.” In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Cohen, A., 172–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Charles. What It Means to Be a Libertarian. New York: Broadway Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. Enlightenment against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. “Conquest, Commerce, and Cosmopolitanism in Enlightenment Political Thought.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, ed. Muthu, Sankar, 199–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, Glen. “Two Dogmas of Liberalism.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Richard. “Political Realism: Introduction.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Robert. “Indigeneity and the Settler Contract Today.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 39, no. 2 (2013): 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “Mill on Happiness: The Enduring Value of a Complex Critique.” In Utilitarianism and Empire, eds. Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, 107–124. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Eoin. “Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 17, no. 2 (2012): 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. “Women and the Making of the Sentimental Family.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 11, no. 1 (1982): 65–88.Google Scholar
Olsen, Mark. “Foucault and Critique: Kant, Humanism and the Human Sciences.” In Futures of Critical Theory: Dreams of Difference, eds. Peters, Michael, Olsen, Mark and Lankshear, Colin, 73–102. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. “Freedom of the Park.” Tribune, December 7, 1945.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. “Decolonizing Liberalism A Critique of Locke and Mill.” In The End Of “Isms”? Reflections on the Fate of Ideological Politics after Communism’s Collapse, ed. Shtromas, Alexander, 85–103. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. “Superior People: The Narrowness of Liberalism from Mill to Rawls.” Times Literary Supplement, February 25, 1994.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. “Liberalism and Colonialism.” In The Decolonization of the Imagination: Culture, Knowledge and Power, eds. Pieterse, Jan Nederveen and Parekh, Bhikhu, 81–98. London: Zed Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. “Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy.” In Public and Private in Social Life, eds. Stanley, I. Benn and Gaus, G. F., 281–303. London: St Martin’s Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole, and Mills, C. W.. Contract and Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Paul, Volker. “Populism and the Crisis of Liberalism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 346–352.Google Scholar
Philips, Menaka. “Troubling Appropriations: J. S. Mill, Liberalism, and the Virtues of Uncertainty.” European Journal of Political Theory 18 (1) 2019: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. “Bentham: Legislator of the World?” In Utilitarianism and Empire, eds. Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, 57–92. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. “Political Theory of Empire and Imperialism.” Annual Review of Political Science, 13 (2010): 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. “Empire, Progress and the ‘Savage Mind’.” In Colonialism and Its Legacies, eds. Levy, Jacob and Young, Iris Marion. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Philp, Mark. “What Is to Be Done? Political Theory and Political Realism.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Mine and Thine? The Kantian State.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, ed. Guyer, Paul, 416–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, , The Republic, trans. Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1992.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. “The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry.” In Philosophy, Politics and Society, eds. Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G.. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1962.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, Mark, 133–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Gyan. “Postcolonial Criticism and Indian Historiography.” Social Text 31/32 (1992): 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Neplanta: Views from South 1 (2000): 533–580.Google Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2007): 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Dennis. The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu and Voltaire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, no. 3 (1985): 223–251.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “The Law of Peoples.” Critical Inquiry 20 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples: with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Reaths, Andrews, Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert J. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31, no. 1 (2000): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Mill’s Neo-Athenian Model of Liberal Democracy.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 221–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick. Kant’s Political Philosophy. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield, 1983.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. “John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, with some Observations on James Mill.” In Essays in English Literature from the Renaissance to the Victorian Age, eds. MacLure, M. and Watt, F. W., 259–262. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Robson, John M. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, John M. “Civilization and Culture as Moral Concepts.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John, 338–371. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, and Schmidt, James, eds. Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Allen D. Kant’s Theory of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Fred. “Method of Reform: J. S. Mill’s Encounter with Bentham and Coleridge.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 124–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Enzo. “Reality and Imagination in Political Theory and Practice: On Raymond Geuss’s Realism.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Jean P. “The Development of Character in Kantian Moral Theory.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27, no. 2 (1989): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumsey, Jean P. “Re-Visions of Agency in Kant’s Moral Theory.” In Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott, Robin May, 125–144. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. John Stuart Mill. London: Rouledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan. “John Stuart Mill’s Art of Living.” In J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in Focus, eds. Gray, John and Smith, G. W., 162–168. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. “Populism, Liberalism, and Democracy.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 44 (2018): 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Andrew. “The British Empire and Its Liberal Mission.” The Journal of Modern History 78, no. 3 (2006): 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Andrew. Liberalism in Empire: An Alternative History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May. “Feminism and Kant: Antipathy or Sympathy?” In Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, eds. Kneller, Jane and Axinn, Sidney, 87–100. New York: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schröder, Hannelore, “Kant’s Patriarchal Order.” In Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott, Robin May, 275–296. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart. “Mill and Sidgwick, Imperialism and Racism.”Utilitas 19 (2007): 104–130.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart, and Varouxakis, Georgios, eds. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham: Lexington Book, 2005.Google Scholar
Scott, David. Refashioning Futures: Criticism After Postcoloniality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, David. Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Scott, David. “The Social Construction of Postcolonial Studies.” In Postcolonial Studies and Beyond, eds. Loomba, Ania, Kaul, Suvir, Bunzl, Matti and Burton, Antoinette, 385–400. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, David. “The Traditions of Historical Others.” Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy 8, no. 1 (2012): 1–8.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Sally. “Can Kant’s Ethics Survive Feminist Critique?” In Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott, Robin May, 77–100. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. The Liberal Ideal and Demons of Empire: Theories of Empire from Adam Smith to Lenin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf, 1999.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld. “Kant’s ‘True Economy of Human Nature’: Rousseau, Count Verri, and the Problem of Happiness.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 194–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. “Kantian Virtue: Priggish or Passional?” In Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, eds. Herman, Barbara and Korsgaard, Christine, 270–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy. Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Singh, Jakeet. “Colonial Pasts, Decolonial Futures: Allen’s The End of Progress.” Theory & Event 19, no. 4 (2016).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleat, Matt. “Bernard Williams and the Possibility of a Realist Political Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 9, no. 4 (2010): 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. “Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species.” The British Journal for the History of Science 12, no. 2 (1979): 109–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. “Performing the Categories: Eighteenth-Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of Kant’s A Priori.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40, no. 2 (2002): 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, Phillip R. “Kant on the History of Nature: The Ambiguous Heritage of the Critical Philosophy for Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 27 (2006): 627–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Social Statics: Or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed. London: John Chapman, 1860.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. Facts and Comments. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Post-Colonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stam, Robert, and Shohat, Ella. “Travelling Multiculturalism.” In Postcolonial Studies and Beyond, eds. Loomba, Ania, Kaul, Suvir, Bunzl, Matti and Burton, Antoinette, 293–316. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip. “Moral Motivation in Kant.” In A Companion to Kant, ed. Bird, Graham, 322–334. Malden: Blackwell, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. The English Utilitarians. London: Duckworth and Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Stewart, Robert Scott. “Art for Argument’s Sake: Saving John Stuart Mill from the Fallacy of Composition.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 27, nos. 3/4 (1993): 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Eric. The English Utilitarians and India. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Storey, Ian. “Empire and Natural Order in Kant’s ‘Second Thoughts’ on Race.” History of Political Thought 36, no. 4 (2015): 670–699.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. “Persecution and the Art of Writing.” Social Research 8, no. 4 (1941): 488–504.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Eileen. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J. S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (1983): 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Adam. “The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances.” Social Theory and Practice 34, no. 3 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. “Democracy, Socialism, and the Working Classes.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John, 372–395. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ten, C. L. “Mill’s Defence of Liberty.” In J. S. Mill’s On Liberty in Focus, eds. Gray, John and Smith, G. W., 212–238. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. ed. Mill’s On Liberty: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Tully, James. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. Public Philosophy in a New Key: Volume 2, Imperialism and Civic Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Tully, James. “Lineages of Contemporary Imperialism.” In Lineages of Empire: The Historical Roots of British Imperial Thought, ed. Kelly, Duncan, 3–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tully, James. On Global Citizenship: James Tully in Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Tunick, Mark. “Tolerant Imperialism: J. S. Mill’s Defense of British Rule in India.” Review of Politics 68, no. 4 (2006): 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Jack. “Thinking Historically.” Theory & Event 19, no. 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. “The Many Heads of the Hydra: J. S. Mill on Despotism.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 66–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. “An Alternative Modernity: Mill on Capitalism and the Quality of Life.” In John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life, eds. Eggleston, Ben, Miller, Dale E. and Weinstein, David, 236–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Zakaras, Alex. J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdez, Inés. “It’s Not about Race: Good Wars, Bad Wars, and the Origins of Kant’s Anti-Colonialism.” American Political Science Review 111, no. 4 (2017): 819–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. “Guizot’s Historical Works and J.S. Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville.” History of Political Thought 20, no. 2 (1999): 292–312.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. Mill on Nationality. London: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios Liberty Abroad: J. S. Mill on International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. “Empire, Race, Euro-Centrism: John Stuart Mill and His Critics.” In Utilitarianism and Empire, eds. Schultz, Bart and Varouxakis, Georgios, 137–154. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Varouxakis, Georgios. “The Godfather of ‘Occidentality’: Auguste Comte and the Idea of ‘the West’.” Modern Intellectual History (2017), doi: 10.1017/S1479244317000415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valls, Andrew. “Self-Development and the Liberal State: The Cases of John Stuart Mill and Wilhelm von Humboldt.” The Review of Politics 61, no. 2 (1999): 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, Dana. Public Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 37, no. 147 (1987): 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “What Plato Would Allow.” Nomos 37 (1995): 138–178.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Mill and Multiculturalism.” In Mill’s On Liberty: A Critical Guide, ed. Ten, C. L., 165–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “Mill’s ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’: A Commentary.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 347–356. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. “Introduction to Lectures on Physical Geography.” In Natural Science, ed. Watkins, Eric, 434–438. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. “Poverty and Property in Kant’s System of Rights.” Notre Dame Law Review 78, no. 3 (2003): 795–828.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. “Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 33 (2008): 1–25.Google Scholar
White, Richard. “Liberalism and Multiculturalism: The Case of Mill.” Journal of Value Inquiry 37, no. 2 (2003): 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Steven K. The Ethos of a Late-Modern Citizen. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Steven K. A Democratic Bearing: Admirable Citizens, Uneven Justice, and Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard. Kant’s Political Philosophy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick and Chrisman, Laura, eds. Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wilson, Catherine. “Kant on Civilization, Culture and Moralisation.” In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Cohen, A., 191–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Fred. “Psychology and the Moral Sciences.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, ed. Skorupski, John, 203–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Holly L. “Kant’s Evolutionary Theory of Marriage.” In Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, eds. Kneller, Jane and Axinn, Sidney, 283–306. Albany State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wilson, Holly L. Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology: Its Origin, Meaning and Critical Significance. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. “Kant and the Problem of Human Nature.” In Essays on Kant’s Anthropology, eds. Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick, 38–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Kant and the Philosophy of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea. “Natura Daedala Rerum? On the Justification of Historical Progress in Kant’s ‘Guarantee of Perpetual Peace’.” Kantian Review 14, no. 2 (2010): 118–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ypi, Lea. “Commerce and Colonialism in Kant’s Philosophy of History.” In Kant and Colonialism, eds. Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea, 99–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “Kant and the Concept of Race: Late Eighteenth-Century Writings.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: An Electronic Journal, January 10, 2014, http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/45502-kant-and-the-concept-of-race-late-eighteenth-century-writings/.Google Scholar
Zammito, John. “What a Young Man Needs for His Venture into the World: The Function and Evolution of the ‘Characteristics’.” In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, ed. Cohen, A., 230–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy.” In J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment, eds. Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, 200–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastoupil, Lynn. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zastoupil, Lynn. “India, Mill, and ‘Western’ Culture.” In J. S. Mill’s Encounter with India, eds. Moir, Martin I., Peers, Douglas M. and Zastoupil, Lynn, 111–148. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Inder S. Marwah, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: Liberalism, Diversity and Domination
  • Online publication: 13 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608497.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Inder S. Marwah, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: Liberalism, Diversity and Domination
  • Online publication: 13 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608497.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Inder S. Marwah, McMaster University, Ontario
  • Book: Liberalism, Diversity and Domination
  • Online publication: 13 May 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608497.008
Available formats
×