Book contents
- Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Advance Praise for Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Neuroscience, Mechanisms, and RDoC
- Part II Phenomenology, Biological Psychology, and the Mind–Body Problem
- Section 4
- Section 5
- Section 6
- Section 7
- Part III Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation
- Index
- References
Section 5
from Part II - Phenomenology, Biological Psychology, and the Mind–Body Problem
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2020
Book contents
- Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Advance Praise for Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Neuroscience, Mechanisms, and RDoC
- Part II Phenomenology, Biological Psychology, and the Mind–Body Problem
- Section 4
- Section 5
- Section 6
- Section 7
- Part III Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Levels of Analysis in PsychopathologyCross-Disciplinary Perspectives, pp. 169 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Bleuler, E. (1950) Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias (J. Zinkin, trans.). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology (7th ed., J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton, trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
References
Bortolotti, L. (2016) ‘Epistemic Benefits of Elaborated and Systematized Delusions in Schizophrenia.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 879–900.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1959) ‘History as Re-enactment of the Past Experience.’ In Gardiner, Patrick, ed., Theories of History: Readings from Classical and Contemporary Sources. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, pp. 251–262.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. D., Young, A. W., Quayle, A. H., and De Pauw, K. W. (1997) ‘Reduced Autonomic Responses to Faces in Capgras Delusion.’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B – Biological Sciences, 264, 1085–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. (1992) The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (1986) ‘Folk Psychology as Simulation.’ Mind and Language, 1, 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1990) ‘“Meaning” Connections and Causal Connections in the Human Sciences: The Poverty of Hermeneutic Philosophy.’ Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 559–577.Google Scholar
Hoerl, C. (2013) ‘Jaspers on Explaining and Understanding in Psychiatry.’ In Stanghellini, Giovanni and Fuchs, Thomas (eds.), One Century of Karl Jaspers’ General Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–120.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1913/1959) General Psychopathology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. and Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using Neuroscience to Help Understand Fear and Anxiety: A Two-System Framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Mishara, A. L. and Corlett, P. (2009) ‘Are Delusions Biologically Adaptive? Salvaging the Doxastic Shear Pin.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 530–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G. (1992) ‘The Origins of Delusion.’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Egan, G. (1986) The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Gorski, M. (2015) Karl Jaspers (1883–1969). In Cautin, R. L. & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology (Vol. III, pp. 1583–1589). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. (1923/1963). General psychopathology (J. Hoenig & M. W. Hamilton, trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Campbell, J. (2014) ‘Expanding the domain of the understandable in psychiatric illness: An updating of the Jasperian framework of explanation and understanding.’ Psychological Medicine, 44, 1–7.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar