Aicart-De Falco, S. & Vion, M. (1987). La mise en place du système phonologique du français chez les enfants entre 3 et 6 ans: Une étude de la production. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 247–266.Google Scholar

Alegria, J. & Mousty, P. (1996). The development of spelling procedures in French-speaking, normal and reading-disabled children: Effects of frequency and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 312–338.Google Scholar

Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Doctoral dissertation, Radcliffe College, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Biedermann-Pasques, L. & Baddeley, S. (2008). Histoire de l’orthographe à travers des manuscrits et des incunables (IXe – XVe siècle). In Desrochers, A., Martineau, F. & Morin, Y. C. (Eds.), Orthographe française: Évolution et pratique (pp. 29–49). Ottawa: Éditions David.Google Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, C. & Chervel, A. (1969). L’orthographe. Paris: Librairie François Maspero.Google Scholar

Bosse, M.-L., Valdois, S. & Tainturier, M.-J. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing, 16, 693–716.Google Scholar

Bourdin, B., Leuwers, C. & Bourbon, C. (2011). Impact des contraintes linguistiques et cognitives sur l’acquisition de l’accord en genre de l’adjectif en français écrit. Psychologie Française, 56, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brissaud, C. & Cogis, D. (2011). Comment enseigner l’orthographe aujourd’hui? Paris: Hatier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruck, M., Genesee, F. & Caravolas, M. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In Blachman, B. A. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bruck, M. & Waters, G. (1988). An analysis of spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 77–92.Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G. & Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686.Google Scholar

Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casalis, S (1995). Lecture et dyslexies de l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Casalis, S (2003). The delay-type in developmental dyslexia: Reading processes. Current Psychology Letters, 10(1). Retrieved from http://cpl.revues.org/document95.html.Google Scholar

Casalis, S., Colé, P. & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.Google Scholar

Casalis, S. & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read in French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casalis, S., Mathiot, E., Bécavin, A. S. & Colé, P. (2003). Conscience morphologique chez des lecteurs tout venant et en difficultés [Morphological awareness in average and below average readers]. Silexicales, 3, 57–66.Google Scholar

Catach, N. (1980). L’orthographe française: Traité théorique et pratique. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Catach, N. (2001). Histoire de l’orthographe française. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Chervel, A. (2008). Histoire de l’enseignement du français du XVIIe au XXe siècle. Paris: Retz.Google Scholar

Chetail, F. & Mathey, S. (2010). InfoSyll: A syllabary providing statistical information on phonological and orthographic syllables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 485–504. DOI:10.1007/s10936-009–9146-y.Google Scholar

Clark, E. V. & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar

Codaire, E. (2008). La ponctuation au siècle des Lumières. In Desrochers, A., Martineau, F. & Morin, Y. C. (Eds.), Orthographe française: Évolution et pratique (pp. 163–183). Ottawa: Éditions David.Google Scholar

Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S. & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2012). Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 97–120.Google Scholar

Colé, P., Marec-Breton, N., Royer, C. & Gombert, J. E. (2003). Morphologie des mots et apprentissage de la lecture. Rééducation Orthophonique, 213(1), 57–60.Google Scholar

Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C. & Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l’apprentissage de la lecture chez l’apprenti-lecteur français du CP au CE2. L’Année Psychologique, 104, 701–750.Google Scholar

Colin, S., Magnan, A., Ecalle, J. & Leybaert, J. (2007). Relation between deaf children’s phonological skills in kindergarten and word recognition performance in first grade. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 139–146.Google Scholar

Content, A. (1991). The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French. Psychological Research, 53, 3–12.Google Scholar

Cook, B. G. & Cook, S. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education, 47, 71–82. DOI:10.1177/0022466911420877.Google Scholar

Cormier, P., Desrochers, A. & Sénéchal, M. (2006). Validation et consistance interne d’une batterie de tests pour l’évaluation multidimensionnelle de la lecture en français. Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 32, 205–225.Google Scholar

Demont, E. & Gombert, J. E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 315–322.Google Scholar

Desrochers, A. (2007). Le développement de la lecture orale chez les élèves du primaire. Keynote address at the annual conference of l’Association québécoise des enseignants du primaire (AQEP), Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

Desrochers, A. & Thompson, G. (2008). De l’orthographe à la lecture orale. In Desrochers, A., Martineau, F. & Morin, Y.-C. (Eds.), Orthographe française: Évolution et pratique. Ottawa: Éditions David.Google Scholar

Dubois, J. (1962). Étude sur la dérivation suffixale en français moderne et contemporain. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Google Scholar

Dubois, J., Jouannon, G. & Lagane, R. (1961). Grammaire française. Paris: Librairie Larousse.Google Scholar

Ducrot, S., Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Pynte, J. & Billard, C. (2003). The optimal viewing position effect in beginning and dyslexic readers. Current Psychology Letters, 10(1). Retrieved from http://cpl.revues.org/document99.html.Google Scholar

Dufau, E., Lété, B., Touzet, C., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J. C. & Grainger, J. (2010). A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 669–694.Google Scholar

Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S. & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405–440.Google Scholar

Duncan, L. G., Colé, P., Seymour, P. H. & Magnan, A. (2006). Differing sequences of metaphonological development in French and English. Journal of Child Language, 33, 369–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C. & Dunn, L. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody: Adaptation française du Peabody vocabulary test-revised. Toronto: Psycan.Google Scholar

Ecalle, J., Bouchafa, H., Potocki, A. & Magnan, A. (2013). Comprehension of written sentences as a core component of children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 117–131. DOI:10.1111/j.1467–9817.2011.01491.x.Google Scholar

Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2002). The development of epiphonological and metaphonological processing at the start of reading: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2007). Development of phonological skills and learning to read in French. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 153–167.Google Scholar

Ecalle, J. & Magnan, A. (2010). L’apprentissage de la lecture et ses difficultés. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Ecalle, J., Magnan, A. & Bouchafa, H. (2008). De la compréhension en lecture chez l’enfant de 7 à 15 ans: Étude d’un nouveau paradigme et analyse des déterminants. Glossa, 105, 36–48.Google Scholar

Eme, E. & Golder, C. (2005). Word-reading and word-spelling styles of French beginners: Do all children learn to read and spell in the same way? Reading and Writing, 18, 157–188.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, M.-F., Brébion, J. & Tardieu, H. (1994). Working-memory capacity and reading comprehension in young and older adults. Psychological Research, 56, 110–115.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, M.-F. & Remond, M. (1997). Skilled and less skilled comprehenders: French children’s processing of anaphoric devices in written texts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 291–309. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1997.tb00522.x.Google Scholar

Fayol, M. (2013). L’acquisition de l’écrit. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Fayol, M., David, J., Dubois, D. & Rémond, M. (2000). Maîtriser la lecture: Poursuivre l’apprentissage de la lecture de 8 à 11 ans. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Fayol, M. & Jaffré, J.-P. (2008). Orthographier. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Fayol, M., Thenevin, M.-G., Jarousse, J.-P. & Totereau, C. (1999). From learning to teaching to learning French written morphology. In Nunes, T. (Ed.), Learning to read: An integrated view from research and practice (pp. 43–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Fayol, M., Totereau, C. & Barrouillet, P. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French. Reading and Writing, 19, 717–736.Google Scholar

François, F., François, D., Sabeau-Jouannet, E. & Sourdot, M. (1977). Syntaxe de l’enfant avant 5 ans. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar

Gardes-Tamine, J. (2002). La grammaire: 1. Phonologie, morphologie, lexicologie, 3rd edn. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Gauthier, C., Bissonnette, S. & Richard, M. (2013). Enseignement explicite et réussite des élèves: La gestion des apprentissages. Montréal: Pearson.Google Scholar

Goosse, A. (1991). La « nouvelle » orthographe.:Exposé et commentaires. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar

Goslin, J. & Floccia, C. (2007). Comparing French syllabification in preliterate and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 341–367. DOI:10.1017.S0142716407070178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E. & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 19–52.Google Scholar

Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M. & Ziegler, J. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432–440.Google Scholar

Grevisse, M. & Goose, A. (2007). Le bon usage: Grammaire française, 14th edn. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar

Guilbert, L. (1975). La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar

Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.Google Scholar

Huot, H. (2001). La morphologie: Forme et sens des mots du français. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Jaffré, J.-P. (2003). La linguistique et la lecture-écriture: De la conscience phonologique à la variable «orthographe». Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 29, 37–49.Google Scholar

Jaffré, J.-P. & Fayol, M. (1997). Orthographes: Des systèmes aux usages. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. R. & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75–82.Google Scholar

Lété, B., Peereman, R. & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 952–977.Google Scholar

Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 156–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.) (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 17th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Leybaert, J. & Alegria, J. (1995). Spelling development in deaf and hearing children: Evidence for use of morpho-phonological regularities in French. Reading and Writing, 7, 89–109.Google Scholar

Leybaert, J. & Content, A. (1995). Reading and spelling acquisition in two different teaching methods: A test of the independence hypothesis. Reading and Writing, 7, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J. & Hallé, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334.Google Scholar

Marec-Breton, N., Gombert, J. É. & Colé, P. (2005). Traitements morphologiques lors de la reconnaissance des mots écrits chez des apprentis lecteurs. L’Année Psychologique, 105, 9–45.Google Scholar

Megherbi, H. & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2004). Compréhension de l’oral chez de jeunes enfants bons et mauvais compreneurs de textes écrits. L’Année Psychologique, 104, 433–489.Google Scholar

Megherbi, H. & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2005). Language impairment in less skilled comprehenders: The on-line processing of anaphoric pronouns in a listening situation. Reading and Writing, 18, 715–753. DOI:10.1007/s11145-005–8131-6.Google Scholar

Megherbi, H., Seigneuric, A. & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2006). Reading comprehension in French 1st and 2nd grade children: Contribution of decoding and language comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 135–147.Google Scholar

Morais, J. (1994). L’art de lire. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Morin, Y. C. (2008). Le Gaygnard (1609): L’Ancienne orthographe, la nouvelle pédagogie et la réforme orthographique. In Desrochers, A., Martineau, F. & Morin, Y. C. (Eds.), Orthographe française: Évolution et pratique (pp. 51–90). Ottawa: Éditions David.Google Scholar

New, B. & Spinelli, E. (2013). Diphones-fr: A French database of diphone positional frequency. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 758–764. DOI:10.3758/s13428-012–0285-y.Google Scholar

Oakhill, J. & Cain, K. (2007). Introduction to comprehension development. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 3–40). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Oakhill, J., Yuill, N. & Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 9, 80–91.Google Scholar

L’Observatoire de la Langue française (2010). Le français dans le monde 2010. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Organisation internationale de la Francophonie (2012). Rapport du Secrétaire général de la Francophonie: De Montreux à Kinshasa. 2010–2012. Paris: Author.Google Scholar

Pacton, S., Fayol, M. & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children’s implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324–339.Google Scholar

Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M. & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426.Google Scholar

Parisse, C. & Le Normand, M. T. (2000). How children build their morphosyntax: The case of French. Journal of Child Language, 27, 267–292.Google Scholar

Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1999). LEXOP: A lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 376–379.Google Scholar

Peereman, R., Lété, B. & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2007). Manulex-Infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme–phoneme mappings, and infralexical and lexical units in child-directed written material. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 593–603. DOI:10.3758/BF03193029.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383. DOI:10.1080/10888430701530730.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In Verhoeven, L., Elbro, C. & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Perret, M. (2008). Introduction à l’histoire de la langue française. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Pierre, R. (2003). L’enseignement de la lecture au Québec de 1980 à 2000: Fondements historiques, épistémologiques et scientifiques. Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 29, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plaza, M. & Cohen, H. (2003). The interaction between phonological processing, syntactic awareness, and naming speed in the reading and spelling performance of first-grade children. Brain and Cognition, 53, 287–292.Google Scholar

Plaza, M. & Cohen, H. (2004). Predictive influence of phonological processing, morphological/syntactic skill, and naming speed on spelling performance. Brain and Cognition, 55, 368–373.Google Scholar

Plaza, M. & Cohen, H. (2007). The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention in early reading and spelling. Dyslexia, 13, 67–76. DOI:10.1002/dys.330.Google Scholar

Pothier, B. (2011). Contribution de la linguistique à l’enseignement du français. Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar

Pothier, B. & Pothier, P. (2008). Pour un apprentissage raisonné de l’orthographe syntaxique. Paris: Retz.Google Scholar

Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Quémart, P., Casalis, S. & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478–496.Google Scholar

Réseau canadien de recherche sur le langage et l’alphabétisation (2009). Pour un enseignement efficace de la lecture et de l’écriture: Une trousse d’intervention appuyée par la recherche. London: Author.Google Scholar

Rey, A., Duval, F. & Siouffi, G. (2007). Mille ans de la langue française. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar

Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L. & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.Google Scholar

Rondal, J. A. (1997). L’évaluation du langage. Liege: Editions Mardaga.Google Scholar

Roy, C. & Labelle, M. (2007). Connaissance de la morphologie dérivationnelle chez les francophones et non-francophones de 6 à 8 ans. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 10, 263–291.Google Scholar

Sanchez, M., Magnan, A. & Ecalle, J. (2012). Knowledge about word structure in beginning readers: What specific links are there with word reading and spelling? European Journal of Psychological of Education, 27, 299–317. DOI:10.1007/s10212-011–0071-8.Google Scholar

Sander, E. K. (1972). When are speech sounds learned? Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 55–63.Google Scholar

Savage, R. S. (2009). What would an evidence-based Canadian National Strategy for early literacy look like? London: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network.Google Scholar

Séguin, H. (1986). Tous les verbes conjugués. Montréal: Centre éducatif et culturel.Google Scholar

Séguin, H. & Desrochers, A. (2008). L’évolution de l’orthographe au fil des dictionnaires de l’académie française. In Desrochers, A., Martineau, F. & Morin, Y. C. (Eds.), Orthographe française: Évolution et pratique (pp. 91–137). Ottawa: Éditions David.Google Scholar

Seidler, S. (1988). Untersuchung zum Erwerb von Wortbildungsregeln Deverbativa Nomina (Agens und Instrument) im Franzosischen. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Universitat Hamburg.Google Scholar

Seigneuric, A. & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children’s reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18, 617–656. DOI:10.1007/s11145-005-2038-0.Google Scholar

Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F. & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-year-olds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 229–246.Google Scholar

Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 54, 76–85.Google Scholar

Sénéchal, M., Basque, M. T. & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.Google Scholar

Seymour, P. H., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Casalis, S. (1995). Reading and spelling acquisition in French first graders: Longitudinal evidence. Reading and Writing, 7, 39–63.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Colé, P. (2013). Lecture et dyslexie: Approche cognitive, 2nd edn. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Béchennec, D. & Kipffer-Piquard, A. (2005). French normative data on reading and related skills from EVALEC, a new computerized battery of tests (end Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3, and Grade 4). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 157–186.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Lacert, P. & Serniclaes, W. (2000). On subtypes of developmental dyslexia: Evidence from processing time and accuracy scores. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 54, 87–104.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D. & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217.Google Scholar

Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S. & Bonnet, P. (1998). Reading and spelling acquisition in French: The role of phonological mediation and orthographic factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 134–165.Google Scholar

Tanguay, B. (2006). L’art de ponctuer. Montréal: Québec-Amérique.Google Scholar

Thiele, J. (1987). La formation des mots en français moderne. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar

Totereau, C., Thevenin, M. G. & Fayol, M. (1997). Acquisition de la morphologie du nombre à l’écrit en français. In Rieben, L., Fayol, M. & Perfetti, C.-A. (Eds.), Des orthographes et leur acquisition. (pp. 147–167). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Van Horn Melton, J. (1988). Absolutism and the eighteenth-century origins of compulsory schooling in Prussia and Austria. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. & Hummer, P. (1990). How German speaking first graders read and spell: Doubts on the importance of the logographic stage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 349–368.Google Scholar

Wioland, F. (1985). Les structures syllabiques du francais. Geneva: Slatkine.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L. & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J., Jacobs, A. M. & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analyses of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 504–515.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C. & Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 947–953.Google Scholar