Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lmer4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia & Bradlow, Ann R.. 2008. Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech 51(3). 175–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clopper, Cynthia & Pate, John. 2008. Effects of talker and token variability on perceptual learning of dialect categories. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 5(1). 060002.Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia & Tamati, Terrin. 2010. Lexical recognition memory across dialects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(3). 1956.Google Scholar

Dimov, Svetlin, Katseff, Shira, & Johnson, Keith. 2012. Social and personality variables in compensation for altered auditory feedback. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, 185–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2). 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drager, Katie. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistic Compass 4(7). 473–480.Google Scholar

Farrington, Charlie, Kendall, Tyler, & Fridland, Valerie. 2015. The dynamic South: Inherent spectral change in the Southern Vowel Shift. Paper presented at Southeastern Conference on Linguistics (SECOL) 82/Language Variation in the South (LAVIS) IV. Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar

Fridland, Valerie & Kendall, Tyler. 2012. The effect of regional vowel differences on vowel perception and production: Evidence from U.S. vowel shifts. Lingua 122(7). 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie 2015. Within-region diversity in the Southern Vowel Shift: Production and perception. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. Paper number 500. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0500.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, & Farrington, Charlie. 2014. Durational and spectral differences in American English vowels: Dialect variation within and across regions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(1). 341–349.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & Ryan, Ellen B. (eds.). 1982. Attitudes towards Language Variation. Social and Applied Contexts. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Harrington, Jonathan. 2012. The coarticulatory basis of diachronic high back vowel fronting. In Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors, 103–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hartley, Laura C. 1999. A view from the West: Perceptions of U.S. dialects by Oregon residents. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1, 315–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Drager, Katie. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4). 865–892.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron, & Drager, Katie. 2006. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23. 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, & Drager, Katie. 2006. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4). 458–484.Google Scholar

Kendall, Tyler & Fridland, Valerie. 2012. Variation in the production and perception of mid front vowels in the US Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40. 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William. 1991. The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.). New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 1–44. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Boston, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. A Multimedia Reference Tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Magnuson, James S. & Nusbaum, Howard C.. 2007. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33(2). 391–409.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology 18. 62–85.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy A. & Preston, Dennis R.. 2000. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nygaard, Lynne C., Sommers, Mitchell S., & Pisoni, David B.. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contigent process. Psychological Science 5(1). 42–46.Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Laver, John, & Anderson, John (eds.). The Cognitive Representation of Speech, 111–122. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 1989. Sound change is drawn from a pool of synchronic variation. In Breivik, Leiv Egil & Jahr, Ernst Hakon (eds.). Language Change: Contributions to the Study of Its Causes, 173–198. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.Google Scholar

Pisoni, David B. 1993. Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication 13. 109–125.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1993. Folk dialectology. In Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). American Dialect Research, 333–378. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Where the worst English is spoken. In Schneider, Edgar (ed.). Focus on the USA, 297–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999. Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. 2013. Language with an attitude. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter & Schilling, Natalie (eds.). The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn. 157–182. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Remez, Robert E., Philip, E. Rubin, P., Pisoni, David B., & Carrell, Thomas D.. 1981. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science 212. 947–950.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger W. & Fasold, Ralph W. (eds.). 1973. Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Solé, Maria-Josep & Recasens, Daniel (eds.). 2012. The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sumner, Meghan & Samuel, Arthur. 2009. The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60. 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Erik. 2002. Sociophonetic applications of speech perception experiments. American Speech 77(2). 115–147.Google Scholar