Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Kant and the Laws of Nature
  • Cited by 6
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Laws of nature play a central role in Kant's theoretical philosophy and are crucial to understanding his philosophy of science in particular. In this volume of new essays, the first systematic investigation of its kind, a distinguished team of scholars explores Kant's views on the laws of nature in the physical and life sciences. Their essays focus particularly on the laws of physics and biology, and consider topics including the separation in Kant's treatment of the physical and life sciences, the relation between universal and empirical laws of nature, and the role of reason and the understanding in imposing order and lawful unity upon nature. The volume will be of great interest to advanced students and scholars of Kant's philosophy of science, and to historians and philosophers of science more generally.

Reviews

'There can be no doubt that this volume will prove a rich source for future discussions [of] issues regarding Kant and the laws of nature.'

Source: Journal of the History of Philosophy

'This is an excellent book that I expect to be extremely useful for anyone interested in Kant's views on necessity, nature, laws, and the natural sciences. I also believe it should be of interest to those working on current debates in these topics who wish to broaden their understanding of the history of these ideas. The book presents a range of philosophical work at the cutting edge, with many contributors engaging with recent work by others in the volume. … By the end of the book, one has a sense that one is up-to-date with several key questions, positions, debates, and developments of these topics of recent years.'

Jessica Leech Source: Notre Dame Review Philosophical Reviews

'The volume succeeds admirably in furthering our understanding of Kant’s Critical writings on laws of nature and showing how they bear on present-day discussion.'

Katherine Dunlop Source: Metascience

'Kant’s philosophy of natural science is a flourishing domain of scholarship, within which the notion of a law is absolutely critical. Kant and the Laws of Nature, which contains thirteen chapters from top-notch, international scholars on the title topic, is hence a text of transparent value to researchers working in this burgeoning area. The volume is not, however, parochially limited to technical readings of Kant’s views on physics. It rather offers substantial treatment of some of the most pressing and knotted issues in Kant scholarship, more broadly. … Massimi and Breitenbach’s volume is a superb resource for Kant scholars of all stripes. Its splendid chapters offer acute and profound insights on the vital topic of laws of nature in Kant’s thought.' 

Michael Bennett McNulty Source: Kantian Review

'Kant and the Laws of Nature, edited and with an introduction by Michela Massimi and Angela Breitenbach, is a collection of thirteen uniformly excellent essays on Kant’s philosophical views on the nature and (metaphysical or epistemic) status of laws of nature, produced under the aegis of a three-year international research network running from 2012–15. But as contemporary Kantian philosophers and not merely as Kant-scholars, why should we care about laws of nature? In my opinion, there are at least four good reasons … Kant’s Neo-Aristotelian Natural Power Grid is not only a new, exciting, and philosophically important Kantian conception of natural laws, but … is well-supported as a post-classical, post-orthodox interpretation of Kant’s theory of natural laws by the thirteen excellent essays in Kant and the Laws of Nature.'

Robert Hanna Source: Critique

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Adams, Robert. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.
Allison, Henry E. 1996. Idealism and Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Henry. 2001. Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. 1978. “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument.” Kant-Studien 69: 273285.
Ameriks, Karl. 2000. Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. 2006. Kant and the Historical Turn. Oxford University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. 2012. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Oxford University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. 2016. “On the Many Senses of ‘Self-Determination,’” in Moran, K. and von Platz, J. (eds.), Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant. Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, David. 1983. What Is a Law of Nature?. Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, John. 1995. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis,” in Wolters, G. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories and Rationality in Biological Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Beck, Lewis White. 1967. “Once More unto the Breach: Kant’s Answer to Hume, Again.” Ratio 9: 3337.
Beiser, Frederick. 2006. “Kant and Naturphilosophie,” in Friedman, M. and Nordmann, A. (eds.), The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth Century Science. MIT Press. Pp. 726.
Bennett, Jonathan. 1966. Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge University Press.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 1993. Equivalence and Priority: Newton versus Leibniz. Oxford University Press.
Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford University Press.
Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. 1781/1789. Ueber den Bildungstrieb. Translated by Crichton, A.. T. Cadell, 1792.
Brandt, Reinhard. 1989. “The Deductions in the Critique of Judgment: Comments on Hampshire and Horstmann,” in Förster, E. (ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions. Stanford University Press.
Breitenbach, Angela. 2006. “Mechanical Explanation of Nature and Its Limits in Kant’s Critique of Judgment.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 37: 694711.
Breitenbach, Angela. 2008. “Two Views on Nature: A Solution to Kant’s Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16: 351369.
Breitenbach, Angela. 2009a. Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur: Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant. Walter de Gruyter.
Breitenbach, Angela. 2009b. “Teleology in Biology: A Kantian Approach.” Kant Yearbook 1: 3156.
Breitenbach, Angela. 2014. “Biological Purposiveness and Analogical Reflection,” in Goy, I. and Watkins, E. (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Biology. Walter de Gruyter.
Breitenbach, Angela. Forthcoming. “Laws and Ideal Unity,” in W. Ott and L. Patton (eds.), Laws of Nature. Oxford University Press.
Brittan, Gordon. 1978. Kant’s Theory of Science. Princeton University Press.
Buchdahl, Gerd. 1965. “Causality, Causal Law, and Scientific Theory in the Philosophy of Kant.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16: 187208.
Buchdahl, G. 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell.
Buchwald, J. Z. 1994. The Creation of Scientific Effects: Heinrich Hertz and Electric Waves. University of Chicago Press.
Buffon, George-Louis Leclerc. 1749–1804. Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roy, 46 vols. Imprimerie du Roi.
Buffon, George-Louis Leclerc. 1792. Buffon’s Natural History Containing a Theory of the Earth, a General History of Man, of the Brute Creation, and of Vegetables, Minerals, &c., 10 vols. Translated by Barr, J. Smith. J. S. Barr.
Chignell, Andrew. 2014. “Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence.” Kant-Studien 105: 573597.
Choi, Sungho and Fara, Michael. 2016. “Dispositions”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/dispositions/>.
Clarke, Ellen. 2010. “The Problem of Biological Individuality.” Biological Theory 5: 312325.
Clarke, Ellen. 2013. “The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 413435.
Cohen, Alix. Forthcoming. “Kant on Evolution: A Re-Evaluation,” in J. Callanan and L. Allais (eds.), Kant on Animals. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, I. Bernard 1980. The Newtonian Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne (eds.). 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press.
Correia, Fabrice 2011. “On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84: 639653.
Darrigol, Olivier. 2000. Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford University Press.
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols. Edited and translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge University Press.
Dretske, Fred. 1977. “Laws of Nature.” Philosophy of Science 44: 248268.
Du Prel, Carl. 1889. Kant’s mystische Weltanschauung, in Immanuel Kant’s Vorlesungen ueber die Psychologie. Ernst Guenther.
Dyck, Corey. 2014. Kant and Rational Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Edwards, Jeffrey. 2000. Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature. University of California Press.
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge University Press.
Ereshefsky, Marc. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Fellin, Renato, and Blè, Alessandro. 1997. “The Disease of Immanuel Kant.” The Lancet 350: 17711773.
Fine, Kit. 1994. “Essence and Modality,” in Tomberlin, J. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language. Ridgeview. Pp. 116.
Fine, Kit. 2002. “Varieties of Necessity,” in Gendler, T. Szabó and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. Pp. 253281.
Fine, Kit. 2012. “Guide to Ground,” in Correia, F. and Schnieder, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 3781.
Floyd, Juliet. 1998. “Heautonomy: Kant on Reflective Judgment and Systematicity,” in Parret, H. (ed.), Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique De Kant. Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 192218.
Förster, Eckart. 2000. Parret, H. (ed.), Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum. Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton University Press.
Friedman, Michael. 1986. “Metaphysical Foundations of Newtonian Science,” in Butts, R. E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. Reidel. Pp. 2560.
Friedman, Michael. 1992a. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael. 1992b. “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 161199.
Friedman, Michael. 1992c. “Regulative and Constitutive.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 30: 73102.
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.
Friedman, Michael. 2008. “Einstein, Kant, and the a Priori,” in Massimi, M. (ed.), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 63. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 95112.
Friedman, Michael. 2010. “Synthetic History Reconsidered,” in Domski, M. and Dickson, M. (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court. Pp. 571813.
Friedman, Michael. 2012a. “Reconsidering the Dynamics of Reason.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 4753.
Friedman, Michael. 2012b. “The Prolegomena and Natural Science,” in Lyre, H. and Schliemann, O. (eds.), Kant’s Prolegomena. Ein kooperativer Kommentar. Klostermann. Pp. 299326.
Friedman, Michael. 2012c. “Newton and Kant: Quantity of Matter in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 50: 482503.
Friedman, Michael. 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, Michael. 2014. “Laws of Nature and Causal Necessity.” Kant-Studien 105: 531553.
Geiger, Ido. 2003. “Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?Kant-Studien 94: 273298.
Geroch, Robert. 1978. General Relativity from A to B. University of Chicago Press.
Ginsborg, Hannah. 1992. “Kant and the Systematicity and Purposiveness of Nature.” Unpublished ms.
Ginsborg, Hannah. 1998. “Korsgaard on Choosing Nonmoral Ends.” Ethics 109: 521.
Ginsborg, Hannah. 2015. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Gregor, Mary J. 1979. “Introduction,” in Kant, Immanuel, Conflict of the Faculties. Translated by Gregor, M. J.. Abaris.
Grier, Michelle. 1997. “Kant on the Illusion of a Systematic Unity of Knowledge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14: 128.
Grier, Michelle. 2001. Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press.
Gurtin, Morton, Fried, Eliot, and Anand, Lallit. 2010. The Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Continua. Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul. 1990. “Reason and Reflective Judgment: Kant on the Significance of Systematicity.” Noûs 24: 1743.
Guyer, Paul. 1997. Kant and the Claims of Taste, second edition (first edition published in 1979). Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul. 2000. “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant’s Conception of the System of Philosophy,” in Sedgwick, S. S. (ed.), The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1963. Reprinted in Guyer 2005.
Guyer, Paul. 2003a. “Kant’s Answer to Hume.” Philosophical Topics 31: 127164. Reprinted in Guyer 2008.
Guyer, Paul. 2003b. “Kant on the Systematicity of Nature: Two Puzzles.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20: 277295.
Guyer, Paul. 2005. Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Guyer, Paul. 2008. Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton University Press. Pp. 71123.
Hamel, Georg. 1909. “Über die Grundlagen der Mechanik.” Mathematische Annalen 66: 350397.
Hebbeler, James. 2015. “Kant on Necessity, Insight, and a Priori Knowledge.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97: 3465.
Herschel, William. 1791. Über den Bau des Himmels: Drey Abhandlungen aus dem Englischen übersetzt. Nebst einem authentischen Auszug aus Kants allgemeiner Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels. Friedrich Nicolovius.
Hume, David. 1739–1740/2007. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Fate, D. and Norton, M. J.. 2 vols. Clarendon Press.
Hume, David. 1748/2000. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Beauchamp, T. L.. Clarendon Press.
Hume, David. 1755. Vermischte Schriften. Translated by Grund, G. C. and Holle, A. H.. Hamburg and Leipzig.
Hume, David. 1778/1998. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edited by Popkin, R. H.. Hackett.
Hume, David. 1790–1792. Über die menschliche Natur. Translated by Jakob, L. H., 3 vols. Hemmerde and Schwetschke.
Irving, J. H., and Kirkwood, J. G.. 1950. “The Statistical Mechanical Theory of Transport Processes IV. The Equations of Hydrodynamics.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 18: 817829.
Jaki, Stanley L. 1981. “Introduction,” in his (tr.) Kant, I. 1755. Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens. Scottish Academic Press.
Joos, Georg 1934. Theoretical Physics. Translated by Freeman, I. M.. Hafner.
Kant, Immanuel. 1900– . Gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols. Edited by Deutsche (formerly Königlich Preussische) Akademie der Wissenschaften. De Gruyter.
Kant, Immanuel. 1992a. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by Young, J. M.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1992b. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. Translated and edited by Walford, D. and Meerbote, R.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1995. Opus Postumum. Translated and edited by Förster, E. and Rosen, M.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, M. J.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Lectures on Metaphysics. Translated and edited by Ameriks, K. and Naragon, S.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2001. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated and edited by Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by Allison, H. E. and Heath, P.. Translated by Hatfield, G., Friedman, M., Allison, H. E. and Heath, P.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated and edited by Friedman, M.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 2012. Natural Science. Edited by Watkins, E.. Translated by Beck, L. W., Edwards, J. B., Reinhardt, O., Schönfeld, M., and Watkins, E.. Cambridge University Press.
Kemp-Smith, Norman. 1992. A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Macmillan.
Kennefick, Daniel. 2009. “Testing Relativity from the 1919 Eclipse: A Question of Bias.” Physics Today 62: 3742.
Kitcher, Philip. 1986. “Projecting the Order of Nature,” in Butts, R. E. (ed.), Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science. Reidel. Pp. 201235.
Kitcher, Philip. 1994. “The Unity of Science and the Unity of Nature,” in Parrini, Paolo (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Kluwer. Pp. 253272.
Kitcher, Philip. 1996. “Aprioristic Yearnings.” Erkenntnis 44: 397416.
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy.” The Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 7797.
Kreines, James. 2009. “Kant on the Laws of Nature and the Limitation of Our Knowledge.” European Journal of Philosophy 17: 527558.
Lagrange, Joseph-Louis. 1777. “Remarques générales sur le mouvement des plusieurs corps qui s’attirent mutuellement en raison inverse des carrés des distances,” in Nouveaux Mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres. Berlin. Pp. 155172.
Lambert, J. H. 1761/1976. Cosmological Letters on the Arrangement of the World Edifice. Edited and translated by Jaki, S. L.. Scottish Academic Press.
Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility and Things in Themselves. Oxford University Press.
Leibniz, Gottfried. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by Ariew, R. and Garber, D.. Hackett.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1980. “Kant, Blumenbach and Vital Materialism in German Biology.” Isis 71: 77108.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1982/1989. The Strategy of Life. University of Chicago.
Lewis, David. 1997. “Finkish Dispositions.” The Philosophical Quarterly 47: 143158.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton University Press.
Lucretius, Titus Carus. 1992. De Rerum Natura. Translated by Rouse, W. H.. Revised by Smith, M. F.. Harvard University Press.
Malvern, Lawrence. 1969. Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall.
Marchand, J. C. 1997. “Was Emmanuel Kant’s Dementia Symptomatic of a Frontal Tumor?Revue Neurologique 153: 3539.
Massimi, Michela. (ed.) 2008. Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 63. Cambridge University Press.
Massimi, Michela. 2011. “Kant’s Dynamical Theory of Matter in 1755, and Its Debt to Speculative Newtonian Experimentalism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 525543.
Massimi, Michela. 2014. “Prescribing Laws to Nature. Part I. Newton, the Pre-Critical Kant, and Three Problems about the Lawfulness of Nature.” Kant-Studien 105: 491508.
Massimi, Michela. Forthcoming. “Why Kant Was Not a Projectivist about Laws,” in Proceedings of the 12th Kant Congress.
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de [aka Dr. Baumann]. 1750. Essay de cosmologie. Paris.
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de [aka Dr. Baumann]. 1754. Essai sur la formation de corps organisés. Paris and Berlin.
McKinsey, John C. C. and Suppes, Patrick. 1955. “On the Notion of Invariance in Classical Mechanics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5: 290302.
McLaughlin, Peter. 1990. Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. Mellon Press.
McLaughlin, Peter. 2003. “Newtonian Biology and Kant’s Mechanistic Concept of Causality,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment. Rowman and Littlefield. Pp. 209218.
McLaughlin, Peter. 2014a. “Transcendental Presuppositions and Ideas of Reason.” Kant-Studien 105: 554572.
McLaughlin, Peter. 2014b. “Mechanical Explanation in the ‘Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment,’” in Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Biology. De Gruyter. Pp. 149166.
McNulty, Bennett. 2015. “Rehabilitating the Regulative Use of Reason: Kant on Empirical and Chemical Laws.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 54: 110.
Mensch, Jennifer. 2013. Kant’s Organicism. University of Chicago Press.
Miranda, Marcelo, Slachevsky, Andrea, and Garcia-Borreguero, Diego. 2010. “Did Immanuel Kant Have Dementia with Lewy Bodies and REM Behavior Disorder?Sleep Medicine 11: 586588.
Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A.. 1973. Gravitation. Freeman
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2000. “Dimensions of Scientific Law.” Philosophy of Science 67: 242265.
Mumford, Stephen. 2004. Laws in Nature. Routledge.
Murdoch, A. Ian. 2012. Physical Foundations of Continuum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Nicholson, Daniel J. 2014. “The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology.” Philosophy Compass 9: 347359.
Okasha, Samir. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131: 191213.
O’Shea, James. 1997. “The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5: 216254.
Ott, Walter. 2009. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Philipp, Wolfgang. 1957. Das Werden der Aufklärung in theologiegeschichtlicher Sicht. Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht.
Pollok, Konstantin. 2001. Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Meiner Verlag.
Pollok, Konstantin. 2014. “‘The Understanding Prescribes Laws to Nature’: Spontaneity, Legislation, and Kant’s Transcendental Hylomorphism.” Kant-Studien 105: 509530.
Prior, E., Pargetter, R., and Jackson, F.. 1982. “Three Theses about Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 251257.
Quarfood, Marcel. 2004. Transcendental Idealism and the Organism: Essays on Kant. Almqvist & Wiksell.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010. “The Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason,” in Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Reath, Andrews. 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1920. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori. Springer
Reimarus, Hermann Samuel. 1766. The Principal Truths of Natural Religion Defended and Illustrated, in Nine Dissertations: Wherein the Objections of Lucretius, Buffon, Maupertius, Rousseau, La Mettrie, and Other Ancient and Modern Followers of Epicurus Are Considered and Their Doctrines Refuted. Translated by R. Wynne B. Law.
Reinhardt, O., and Oldroyd, D. R.. 1982Kant’s Thoughts on the Aging of the Earth.” Annals of Science 39: 349369.
Resnick, Robert. 1968. Introduction to Special Relativity. Wiley.
Richards, Robert. 2000. “Kant and Blumenbach on the Bildungstrieb: A Historical Misunderstanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31: 1132.
Ripstein, Arthur. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Roger, Jacques. 1997. Buffon: A Life in Natural History. Translated by Bonnefoi, S. Lucille. Cornell University Press.
Rohlf, Michael. 2014. “The Rationality of Induction in Kant (and Hume).” Idealistic Studies 43: 153169.
Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction,” in Hale, B. and Hoffmann, A. (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. Pp. 109136.
Rosenberg, Alexander. 1994. Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science. University of Chicago Press.
Rudwick, Martin J. 2014. Earth’s Deep History. University of Chicago Press.
Rueger, Alexander. 2007. “Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature.” British Journal of Aesthetics 47: 138155.
Rueger, Alexander. 2008. “Beautiful Surfaces: Kant on Free and Adherent Beauty in Nature and Art.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16: 535557.
Rush, Fred L. Jr. 2000. “Reason and Regulation in Kant.” The Review of Metaphysics 53: 837862.
Rutherford, Donald. 1993. “Nature, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz’s Critique of Occasionalism,” in Nadler, S. (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schönfeld, Martin 2000. The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Pre-Critical Project. Oxford University Press
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1813/2012. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, second edition. Translated by Cartwright, D. E., Erdmann, E. E., and Janaway, C.. Cambridge University Press.
Sloan, Philip R. 2006. “Kant on the History of Nature: The Ambiguous Heritage of the Critical Philosophy for Natural History.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37: 637648.
Smith, George E. 2002. “The Methodology of the Principia,” in Cohen, I. B. and Smith, G. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 138173.
Smith, George E. 2012. “How Newton’s Principia Changed Physics,” in Janiak, A. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 360395.
Smith, George E. 2014. “Closing the Loop: Testing Newtonian Gravity, Then and Now,” in Biener, Z. and Schliesser, E. (eds.), Newton and Empiricism. Oxford University Press. Pp. 252351.
Smith, Sheldon. 2013. “Kant’s Picture of Monads in the Physical Monadology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 102111.
Sober, Elliott. 1997. “Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.” Philosophy of Science 64, Supplement: 458467.
Stan, Marius. 2014. “Unity for Kant’s Natural Philosophy.” Philosophy of Science 81: 423443.
Stark, Werner (ed.). 2004. Immanuel Kant, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Walter de Gruyter.
Stein, Howard. 1970. “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell, and Beyond,” in Stuewer, R. (ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspective of Science. University of Minnesota Press. Pp. 264287.
Sterelny, Kim. 2001. “The Reality of Ecological Assemblages: A Palaeoecological Puzzle.” Biology and Philosophy 16: 437461.
Sutherland, Daniel. 2014. “Kant on the Construction and Composition of Motion in the Phoronomy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44: 686718.
Teufel, Thomas. 2012. “What Does Kant Mean by ‘Power of Judgment’ in His Critique of the Power of Judgment?Kantian Review 17: 297326.
Tolley, Clinton. 2006. “Kant and the Nature of Logical Laws.” Philosophical Topics 34: 371407.
Tooley, Michael. 1977. “The Nature of Laws.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 74: 667698.
Truesdell, Clifford. 1991. A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics, second edition. Boston: Academic Press.
Van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetries. Oxford University Press.
Vetter, Barbara. 2012. “Dispositional Essentialism and the Laws of Nature,” in Bird, A., Ellis, B., and Sankey, H. (eds.), Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. Routledge.
Walsh, Denis. 2015. Organisms, Agency, and Evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Warren, Daniel. 2001. Reality and Impenetrability in Kant’s Philosophy of Nature. Routledge.
Watkins, Eric. 1997. “The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant.” Perspectives on Science 5: 311348.
Watkins, Eric. 1998a. “Kant’s Justification of the Laws of Mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 539560.
Watkins, Eric. 1998b. “The Argumentative Structure of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 567593.
Watkins, Eric. 2000. “Kant on Rational Cosmology,” in Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. Oxford University Press. Pp. 7089.
Watkins, Eric. 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge University Press.
Watkins, Eric. 2009. “The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.” Kantian Yearbook 1: 197221.
Watkins, Eric. 2013. “Kant on Infima Species,” in La Rocca, Claudio (ed.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. De Gruyter. Vol. 5, pp. 283294.
Watkins, Eric. 2014a. “What Is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?Kant-Studien 105: 471490.
Watkins, Eric. 2014b. “Nature in General as a System of Ends,” in Goy, I. and Watkins, E., Kant’s Theory of Biology. Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 117130.
Wilson, Robert A., and Barker, Matthew. 2017. “The Biological Notion of Individual,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/biology-individual/>.
Wilson, Catherine. 2005. “Kant and the Speculative Sciences of Origins,” in Smith, J. E. H. (ed.), The Problem of Animal Generation in the 17th and 18th Centuries. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 375401.
Wilson, Mark. 2013. “What Is ‘Classical Mechanics’ Anyway?,” in Batterman, R. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press. Pp. 43106.
Zammito, John. 1992. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
Zammito, John. 2012. “The Lenoir Thesis Revisited: Blumenbach and Kant.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 120132.
Zuckert, Rachel. 2007. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.