Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:44:53.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Human Rights Entrepreneurs: NGOs and the ATS Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jeffrey Davis
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Get access

Summary

DOE V. SARAVIA

“In the name of God, then, and in the name of this suffering people, whose cries rise to heaven each day more tumultuous, I beseech you, I beg you, I order you, in the name of God, stop the repression.” On March 23, 1980, Archbishop Oscar Romero, delivered this homily in El Salvador demanding that the military cease its campaign of repression. The next day an assassin shot Archbishop Romero to death as he blessed the Eucharist during mass. Romero was a champion for the justice and dignity of the poor in El Salvador. “During his life he came to be known as the ‘Voice of the Voiceless,’ and his model has stood for nearly 25 years as one of the world's most revered beacons of hope.” As one of his fellow priests recalled, the poor in El Salvador “saw him as a man of God, a man who spoke the truth, a man that defended the poor, a man that was close to them.” He was one of the most important and recognizable figures in the struggle for human rights in Latin America. His assassination was a seminal event for El Salvador and the region. Nonetheless, no one has ever been punished for committing or planning the crime.

Those responsible for the assassination thwarted any attempt to hold them accountable. On the night of the killing, Judge Ramirez Amaya began an investigation by ordering an autopsy and securing bullet fragments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Justice Across Borders
The Struggle for Human Rights in U.S. Courts
, pp. 44 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Songer, Donald R. and Kuersten, Ashlyn, “The Success of Amici in State Supreme Courts,” Political Research Quarterly 48, no. 1 (1995): 31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. and Sheehan, Reginald S., “Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court,” Political Research Quarterly 46 no. 2 (1993): 339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Susan M., “Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court: Beyond the Political Disadvantage Theory,” Journal of Politics 52, no. 3 (1990): 854–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, Steven C., “On Behalf of the Condemned? The Impact of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund on Capital Punishment Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” Political Research Quarterly 51, no. 1 (1998): 191–219, 192Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R., The Rights Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, “Human Rights, Principled Issue Networks and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47, no. 3 (1993): 411–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Howard, “Interest Group Litigation to Enforce Human Rights,” Political Science Quarterly 105 no. 4 (1990–1991): 617–638, 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, “The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Human Rights Home,” Houston Law Review 35 (1998): 647Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Wright, John R., “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review 82 (1988): 1109–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Kobylka, Joseph, The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992)Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. and Caldeira, Gregory A., “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review 87 (1993): 717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Karen, Women's Organizations' Use of the Court (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980)Google Scholar
Kobylka, Joseph F., “A Court Created Context for Group Litigation: Libertarian Groups and Obscenity,” Journal of Politics 49 (1987): 1061–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Jr. Joseph, and Sheffield, Jr. James E., “Does Interest Group Litigation Matter? The Case of Black Political Mobilization in Mississippi,” Journal of Politics 49 (1987): 780–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Wright, JohnR., “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review 82 (1988): 1109–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Conservatives in Court (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1985)Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen, Women's Organizations' Use of the Court. (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books 1980)Google Scholar
George, Tracy E. and Epstein, Lee, “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making,” American Political Science Review 86 (1992): 323–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Rowland, C. K., “Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts,” American Political Science Review 85 (1991): 205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thoma, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (New York: Cambridge University Press 1999), 5CrossRef
Galanter, Marc, “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law and Society Review 9 (1974): 95–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songer, Donald R. and Sheehan, Reginald S., “Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals,” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1992): 235–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×