Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:12:29.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Immunoembolization for Melanoma

from PART III - ORGAN-SPECIFIC CANCERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2010

Kevin L. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Radiology Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia, PA
Jean-François H. Geschwind
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael C. Soulen
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

IMMUNOTHERAPY

There is evidence to support the concept that the human immune system can be manipulated to elicit an immune response to cancer cells and, at least in some cases, lead to tumor regression (1). The goal of immune therapy is to identify cancer as targets for immune system destruction. The challenge is that tumors are not foreign, but self. Some tumors do have cell surface markers that are unique to tumors, are present in much larger numbers than on normal cells or are normally present only on fetal cells. Such differences are probably the products of normally unexpressed genes. In tumors of viral origin, viral antigens may be present on the cell surface. It is these differences that provide the rationale for cancer immune therapy.

RATIONALE FOR LOCAL IMMUNOTHERAPY OF LIVER METASTASES

There is considerable experience in the treatment of cancer with systemic cytokines; however, there are a number of reasons why local, rather than systemic, administration of cytokines should be considered. Cytokines are normally present at very low levels systemically, but high, non-physiologic levels are necessary for systemic therapy. Some cytokines delivered in this manner can induce severe toxicity. Tolerance is a major barrier to immunotherapy. Direct administration of immunostimulants may alter the local environment and break the immunotolerance created by the tumor cells. In addition, the ischemia-induced necrotic tumor cells from embolization with the concomitant delivery of immunostimulants supply activated antigen-presenting cells with tumor antigens, which may lead to the creation of an in situ cancer vaccine.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interventional Oncology
Principles and Practice
, pp. 311 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schott, M. Immune surveillance by dendritic cells: Potential implication for immunotherapy of endocrine cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2006; 13 (3): 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, T, Sakon, M, Umeshit, K, et al. Appraisal of transarterial immunoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2001; 32: 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, A M, Hershberg, R M, and Small, E J. Immunotherapy for prostate cancer using prostatic acid phosphatase loaded antigen presenting cells. Urol Oncol, 2006 Sep–Oct; 24(5): 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dranoff, G, Jafee, E, Lazenby, A, et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulation factor stimulated potent, specific, and long lasting anti-tumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993; 90: 3539–3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiloh, A, Sullivan, K, and Sato, T. Response of melanoma metastatic to liver following immunoembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003; 14: s93.Google Scholar
Schuurman, B, Heuff, G, Beelen, R H, et al. Enhanced killing capacity of human Kupffer cells after activation with human granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and interferon gamma. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 1994 Sep; 39(3): 179–184.Google Scholar
Maeurer, M J, Gollin, S M, Martin, D. Tumor escape from immune recognition: Lethal recurrent melanoma in a patient associated with down regulation of the peptide transporter protein TAP-1 and loss of expression of the immunodominant MART-1/Melan-A antigen. J Clin Invest, 1996 October 1; 98(7): 1633–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paschen, A, Arens, N, Sucker A, , et al. The coincidence of chromosome 15 aberrations and β2-microglobulin gene mutations is causative for the total loss of human leukocyte antigen class I expression in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2006; 12: 3297–3305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speiser, D E, Miranda R, , Zakarian A, , et al. Self antigens expressed by solid tumors do not efficiently stimulate naive or activated T cells: Implications for immunotherapy. J Exp Med, August 29, 1997; 186(5): 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, S W, Elmslie, R E, Willson, A P, et al. In vivo tumor transfection with superantigen plus cytokine genes induces tumor regression and prolongs survival in dogs with malignant melanoma. J Clin Invest, June 1998; 101(11): 2406–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, T L. Methods to monitor immune response and quality control. Dev Biol (Basel), 2004; 116: 219–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Mocellin, S, Ohnmacht, G A, Wang, E, et al. Kinetics of cytokine expression in melanoma metastases classifies immune responsiveness. Int J Cancer, 2001 Jul 15; 93(2): 236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, C D, Measel, J W Jr, Amoss, M S Jr, et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and peripheral blood lymphocytes isolated from melanomatous and non-melanomatous Sinclair miniature swine. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 1996 Dec; 55(1–3): 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, K, Burns, R, Loeffer, K, et al. Uveitis caused by cytotoxic immune response to cutaneous malignant melanoma in swine: Destruction of uveal melanocytes during tumor regression. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci, 24: 1063–1069; 1983.Google ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, K L, Aoyama, T, Sato, T, et al. Safety of immunoembolization of normal swine liver with human GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor) and ethiodol. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001; 12: S132.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×