Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:20:04.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1946–2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

Paul B. Stephan
Affiliation:
University of Virginia School of Law
David L. Sloss
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, California
Michael D. Ramsey
Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
William S. Dodge
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of Law
Get access

Summary

Postwar America, most would agree, was a very different country from the one that went to war four years earlier. Consider first the demographic changes. Vast numbers of men had left their homes to move around the country, if not around the world. Almost as many women had taken on new roles in the wartime economy, moving sociologically if not necessarily geographically. At least as important was the transformation of the economy. A fragile recovery from a profound depression became an extraordinarily robust economic expansion. State management of that economy was extensive and, thanks to the happy outcome of the war, widely accepted as desirable.

Then there was the intangible impact of the war. A great sense of triumph, untempered by the widespread devastation and economic collapse that afflicted the other victorious allies (not to mention the vanquished), suffused the culture. Higher education opened up to the returning GIs on a scale never before known in American history, enabling access for many to a meritocratic, rationalized (in the bureaucratic sense) middle and upper-middle class. The conditions faced by returning African American soldiers were little different from those they had left, but their experience in the war made them less willing to accept the indignities of Jim Crow. And a distant and exotic outside world had become a direct and pervasive presence, both in the parts of the globe that the victorious nation administered, reconstructed, and guarded and in the other, darker parts that posed a new, seemingly existential threat.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yoo, John C., Globalism and the Constitution: Treaties, Non-Self-Execution and the Original Understanding, 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1955 (1999)
Flaherty, Martin S., History Right?: Historical Scholarship, Original Understanding, and Treaties as “Supreme Law of the Land,” 99 Colum. L. Rev. 2095 (1999)
Bradley, Curtis A. & Goldsmith, Jack L., Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modern Position, 110 Harv. L. Rev. 815, 828–31 (1997)
Goldsmith, Jack L., Federal Courts, Foreign Affairs, and Federalism, 83 Va. L. Rev. 1617, 1627–41 (1997)
Koh, Harold H., Is International Law Really State Law? 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1824, 1833–38 (1998)
Ray, Laura Krugman, Clerk and Justice: The Ties That Bind John Paul Stevens and Wiley B. Rutledge, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 211 (2008)
Lochner, Barry Cushman, Liquor, and Longshoremen: A Puzzle in Progressive Era Federalism, 32 J. Mar. L. & Com. 1 (2001)
Ely, John H., The American War in Indochina: The Unconstitutionality of the War They Didn't Tell Us About, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 1093 (1990)
Schwartz, Warren F. & McCormack, Wayne, The Justiciability of Legal Objections to the American Legal Effort in Vietnam, 46 Tex. L. Rev. 1033 (1968)
Henkin, Louis, The Supreme Court 1967 Term–Foreword: On Drawing Lines, 82 Harv. L. Rev. 63, 90 (1968)
White, G. Edward, The Transformation of the Constitutional Regime of Foreign Relations, 85 Va. L. Rev. 1, 120–34 (1999)
Alstine, Michael, The Death of Good Faith in Treaty Jurisprudence and a Call for Resurrection, 93 Geo. L.J. 1885 (2005)
Bederman, David J., Revivalist Canons and Treaty Interpretation, 41 UCLA L. Rev. 953 (1994)
Cleveland, Sarah H., Our International Constitution, 31 Yale J. Int'l L. 1, 69 (2006)
Schmitt, Glenn R., Closing the Gap in Criminal Jurisdiction Over Civilians Accompanying the Armed Forces Abroad – A First Person Account of the Creation of the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000, 51 Cath. U. L. Rev. 55 (2000)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×