Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T00:12:12.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the ‘New Europe’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Alexandra Gheciu
Affiliation:
Research Associate in the Department of Politics and International Relations, Oxford University; Research Fellow, Somerville College, Oxford University
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

In recent years, the relationship between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the former communist countries of Europe has been the focus of numerous analyses in the field of international relations. This article seeks to contribute to those analyses by arguing that, following the end of the Cold War, NATO became systematically engaged in the projection of a particular set of Western-based norms into Central and Eastern Europe. Conventional wisdom about international security portrays NATO as a military alliance, irrelevant to processes of constructing or reproducing domestic norms and institutions. Contrary to that view, I show that NATO played an important role in the reconstitution of postcommunist polities. The alliance relied especially on mechanisms of teaching and persuasion in an effort to socialize Central and East European actors into a particular, liberal-democratic vision of correct norms of governance.

NATO was especially heavily involved in the eastern projection of liberal-democratic norms in the field of security. These include accountability and transparency in the formulation of defense policies and budgets, the division of powers within the state in the area of security, government oversight of the military through civilian defense ministries, and accountability for the armed forces. In addition, NATO has sought to project into Central and East European countries Western-defined liberal norms and rules of international behavior, in particular involving peaceful settlement of disputes, multilateralism, and democracy and human rights promotion in the international arena.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel. 1997. Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations. Millennium 26 (2):249–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1998. Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE's Security Community-Building Model. In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, 119–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmus, Ronald. 2002. Opening NATO's Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barany, Zoltan. 2003. The Future of NATO Expansion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59 (l):39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other “Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron, J. C.. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1997. International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide. European Journal of International Relations 3 (4):473–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. ‘Going Native’ in Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 36:209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? (Forum Debate). European Union Politics 1 (2):219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert. 1993. Influence: Science and Practice. 3d ed. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and Davis, James. 2000. Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda. International Studies Review 2 (l):65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culik, Jan. 1999. Ten Years After Communism: The Great Czech Malaise. Central Europe Review 1 (1). Available at (http://www.ce-review.Org/99/l/culikl.html). Accessed 21 June 2005.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Chris. 1997a. Developing a National Strategy for the Transformation of the Defense Establishment in Post-Communist States. Central European Issues 3 (2):63–81.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Chris. 1997b. Defense Transformation in the New Democracies: A Framework for Tackling the Problem. NATO Review 45 (1):15–19.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1975. Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Dragsdahl, Joergen. 1998. NATO Resists Pressures to Militarise Central Europe. BASIC Occasional Paper 28. Available at (http://www.basicint.org/pubs/Papers/BP28.htm). Accessed 21 June 2005.
Evangelista, Matthew. 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flockhart, Trine. 2004. ‘Masters and Novices’: Socialisation and Social Learning through the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. International Relations 18 (3):361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra. 2005. NATO in the ‘New Europe’: The Politics of International Socialization After the Cold War. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1998. A Sober Second Thought: Persuading Russians to Tolerate. American Journal of Political Science 42 (3):819–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gousseff, Catherine. 2000. L'effet Kosovo sur les nouveaux partenaires de l'OTAN. Courrier des Pays de I'Est 1001 (1):4–16.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftendorn, Helga, Robert Keohane, and Celeste Wallander, eds. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoskova, Mahulena. 1999. Civilian Control of the Military and Security Structures of the Czech Republic. Unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hybner, Jiri. 2001. The Significance of the Washington Summit for Strengthening the Membership of the Czech Republic in NATO. NATO-EAPC Fellowship Report, 1999–2001. Brussels: NATO HQ.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald, Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter. 1996. Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security. In The Culture of National Security, edited by Peter Katzenstein, 33–75. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Joergensen, Charlotte, Kock, Christian, and Roerbech, Lone. 1998. Rhetoric That Shifts Votes: An Explanatory Study of Persuasion in Issue-Oriented Public Debates. Political Communication 15:283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James A., and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1):7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–85.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert. 1998. Educating Leaders for the 21st Century: A Snapshot of the Marshall Center for Security Studies. NATO Review 46 (4). Available at: 〈http://www.nato.int/docu/review/1998/9804-08.htm〉. Accessed 21 June 2005.Google Scholar
Lauer, Robert, and Handel, Warren. 1977. Social Psychology: The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interactionism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4):943–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2):225–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutz, Diane C., Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard, eds. 1996. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Rodger. 2001. Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction. European Journal of International Relations 7 (1):37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecina, Thomas. 1999. Arranged Marriage with Aborted Honeymoon? The Czech Republic and NATO. Central Europe Review 1 (5). Available at (http://www.ce-review.Org/99/5/pecina5.html). Accessed 21 June 2005.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter, and DiMaggio, Paul. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2001. Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy. International Security 25 (4):41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (l):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1996. Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO. In The Culture of National Security, edited by Peter Katzenstein, 357–99. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roman, Petre. 1999. Building a Government-Opposition Consensus in the Field of Security Policy. In Romania and Euro-Atlantic Integration, edited by Treptow, Kurt and lonescu, Mihail, 83–91. lasi, Romania: Center for Romanian Studies.Google Scholar
Romanian Government. 1999a. Programul National Anual de Pregatire a Integrarii in NATO (ANP) Conform Planului de Actiune Pentru Aderare (MAP). Bucharest, Romania: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Romanian Government. 1999b. White Book on Romania and NATO. Bucharest, Romania: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Ruggie, John. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarvas, Stefan. 1999. One Past, Two Futures?: The NATO Enlargement Debate in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Harmonie Paper 4. Groningen, Netherlands: Center for European Security Studies.
Sava, lonel Nicu. 2002. Western (NATO/PFP) Assistance to Build Democratic Civil-Military Relations in South Eastern Europe: The Case of Bulgaria, Romania and Slovenia. Manfred Womer Fellowship Report. Brussels: NATO.
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2000. International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment. European Journal of International Relations 6 (l):109–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searing, Donald. 1995. The Psychology of Political Authority: A Causal Mechanism of Political Learning Through Persuasion and Manipulation. Political Psychology 16 (4):677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jeffrey. 2000. Transforming the Armed Forces of Central and Eastern Europe. Strategic Forum 172:1–8.Google Scholar
Simon, Jeffrey. 2004. NATO and the Czech and Slovak Republics: A Comparative Study in Civil-Military Relations. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stroehlein, Andrew. 1999. Promising Paradise. Central Europe Review 0 (23). Available at (http://www.ce-review.org/authorarchives/stroehlein_archive/stroehlein23old.html). Accessed 22 April 2005.Google Scholar
Terry, Deborah, and Hogg, Michael, eds. 2000. Attitudes, Behavior and Social Context. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Marybeth Peterson. 2000. Democratizing Communist Militaries: The Cases of the Czech and Russian Armed Forces. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste. 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallander, Celeste, and Robert Keohane. 1999. Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions. In Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space, edited by Haftendorn, Helga, Keohane, Robert, and Wallander, Celeste, 21–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waterman, Harvey, Zagorcheva, Dessie, and Reiter, Dan. 2002. NATO and Democracy. International Security 26 (3):221–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 1997. The Institutions of Security: Elements of a Theory of Security Organizations. Cooperation and Conflict 32 (3):287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C.. 2001. The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism, and the Social Construction of Security Communities. European Journal of International Relations 7 (4):525–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C., and Neumann, Iver. 2000. From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia and the Power of Security. Millennium 29 (2):357–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajicova, Darja. 2000. The Czech Media: Demythtified. Central Europe Review 2 (24). Available at: (http://www.ce-review.org). Accessed 22 April 2005.Google Scholar
Zanna, Mark, Olson, James, and Herman, Peter, eds. 1984. Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip, and Leippe, Michael. 1991. The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×