Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: May 2018

7 - Individual complaints procedures

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Complaints procedures offer a unique opportunity for individuals and groups to have claims of human rights violations considered and their rights vindicated in a judicial or quasi-judicial procedure. For non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and human rights lawyers, complaints procedures are an important avenue to pursue strategic objectives, in addition to supporting victims in individual cases. States, on the other hand, may find themselves having to defend allegations of specific or systemic violations. Ideally, complaints procedures act as a mirror that provides an opportunity for states to bring their practices into conformity with the respective treaty. In practice, however, states often view unfavourable decisions as unwarranted criticism, which may create difficulties at the implementation stage. The treaty bodies themselves are in theory neutral arbiters that apply the treaty provisions and rules of procedures. However, inevitably, their position as bodies created by states, and relying on states’ cooperation on the one hand and seeking the effective protection of human rights on the other, raises a host of challenges in actual practice.

This chapter is written generically from the perspective of litigants (which will mainly be referred to as applicants throughout the chapter), examining the common stages of admissibility, merits, decision, remedies and implementation that are characteristic of complaints procedures before treaty bodies (the term is used in this chapter to refer to both United Nations (UN) treaty bodies and regional human rights commissions and courts). Questions considered include in particular:

  • 1. Jurisdiction. Who can bring a case against whom in relation to what types of violation alleged to have been committed, when and where?

  • 2. Exhaustion of domestic remedies. What are the reasons for requiring a litigant to take legal steps (pursue remedies) first in the state where the alleged violation occurred? Is it always clear what steps need to be taken? Are there any exceptions? Who carries the burden of proof?

  • 3. Others. Are there any time limits for submitting applications? Can a case be brought before more than one treaty body? Does it need to be written in a particular language, etc.? As for the merits, what does it take to prove a complaint?

  • 4. And finally, what is the nature of the decisions treaty bodies can make and the types of remedies awarded?

  • Burgorgue-Larsen, L., and Ubeda de Torres, A., The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Case Law and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011).
    Evans, M., and Murray, R. (eds.), The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: The System in Practice 1986–2006, (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
    Gerards, J. (ed.), Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and of the Judgments of the ECtHR in National Case-law: A Comparative Analysis (Intersentia, 2014).
    Hillebrecht, C., Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
    Joseph, S., and Castan, M., The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary, (Oxford University Press, 2013).
    Keller, H., Forowicz, M. and Engi, L., Friendly Settlements before the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).
    Leach, P., Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, (Oxford University Press, 2011).
    Open Society Justice Initiative, From Judgment to Justice, Implementing International and Regional Human Rights Decisions (2010).
    Open Society Justice Initiative, From Rights to Remedies: Structures and Strategies for Implementing International Human Rights Decisions (2013).
    Pasqualucci, J. M., The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
    Rieter, E., Preventing Irreparable Harm: Provisional Measures in International Human Rights Adjudication (Intersentia, 2010).
    ACmHPR: www.achpr.org
    ACtHPR: www.african-court.org
    ECtHR: www.echr.coe.int
    IACHR: www.oas.org/en/iachr
    IACtHR: www.corteidh.or.cr
    ICJ: www.icj-cij.org
    OHCHR: www.ohchr.org (providing links to all human rights treaty bodies).
    American Society of International Law: Electronic Resource Guide www.asil.org/resource/humrts1 .htm
    Bayefsky: UN Human Rights Treaty System: www.bayefsky.com
    Commonwealth and International Human Rights Law Database: commonwealth-and-international-law-database/index.html
    OMCT Handbook Series, Second Edition (‘OMCT's Handbook Series consists of four volumes, each one providing a detailed guide to the practice, procedures, and jurisprudence of the regional and international mechanisms that are competent to examine individual complaints concerning the violation of the absolute prohibition of torture and ill-treatment’), www.omct.org/monitoring-protection-mechanisms/reports-and-publications/2014/11/d22956
    Project Diana Online Human Rights Archive: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/diana.asp
    University of Minnesota- Human Rights Library: www1.umn.edu/humanrts
    World Courts: www.worldcourts.com