Book contents
- Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, & Law
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, & Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Contextualization
- 1 Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law
- 2 The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community*
- 3 Emulating Sherlock Holmes: The Dog That Didn’t Bark, the Victim Who Didn’t Sue, and Other Contradictions of the “Hyper-Litigious” Society
- 4 Karl’s Law School, or The Oven Bird in Buffalo
- Part II The Oven Bird’s Insights into the Legal System and Legal Process
- Part III Insiders, Outsiders, Class Conflict, and Difference
- Part IV Conflict and Law in Other Cultures
- Part V Afterword
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
2 - The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community*
from Part I - Introduction and Contextualization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, & Law
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, & Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction and Contextualization
- 1 Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and Law
- 2 The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community*
- 3 Emulating Sherlock Holmes: The Dog That Didn’t Bark, the Victim Who Didn’t Sue, and Other Contradictions of the “Hyper-Litigious” Society
- 4 Karl’s Law School, or The Oven Bird in Buffalo
- Part II The Oven Bird’s Insights into the Legal System and Legal Process
- Part III Insiders, Outsiders, Class Conflict, and Difference
- Part IV Conflict and Law in Other Cultures
- Part V Afterword
- Index
- Books in the Series
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Insiders, Outsiders, Injuries, and LawRevisiting 'The Oven Bird's Song', pp. 8 - 37Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
ABEL, Richard L. (1973) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AUBERT, Vilhelm (1963) “Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution,” 7 Journal of Conflict Resolution 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLACK, Donald and Baumgartner, M.P. (1983) “Toward a Theory of the Third Party,” in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds.), Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1978) Code and Custom in a Thai Provincial Court. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M.(1980) “Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court,” 1980 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 425.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L.F. (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. and Percival, Robert V. (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon L. (1969) “Human Interaction and the Law,” 14 American Journal of Jurisprudence 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc(1983) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don’t Know (And Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 UCLA Law Review 4.Google Scholar
GEST, Ted, Solorzano, Lucia, Shapiro, Joseph P. and Doan, Michael (1982) “See You in Court,” 93 U.S. News & World Report 58 (December 20).Google Scholar
GREENHOUSE, Carol J. (1982) “Nature Is to Culture as Praying Is to Suing: Legal Pluralism in an American Suburb,” 20 Journal of Legal Pluralism 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McINTOSH, Wayne (1980-81) “150 Years of Litigation and Dispute Settlement: A Court Tale,” 15 Law & Society Review 823.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura and Todd, Harry F. Jr. (1978) “Introduction: The Dispute Process—Law in Ten Societies,” in Nader, L. and Todd, H. Jr. (eds.), The Disputing Process—Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS (1979) State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report, 1975.Google Scholar
NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS(1982) State Court Caseload Statistics: Annual Report, 1977.Google Scholar
PERHAM, John (1977) “The Dilemma in Product Liability,” 109 Dun’s Review 48 (January).Google Scholar
PERIN, Constance (1977) Everything in Its Place. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Maurice (1977) “Contemporary Litigation in the United States,” in Jones, H. (éd.), Legal Institutions Today: English and American Approaches Compared. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
SIMMEL, Georg (1908/1971) “The Stranger,” in Levine, D. (éd.), On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
STEELE, Eric H. (1975) “Fraud, Dispute and the Consumer: Responding to Consumer Complaints,” 123 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1107.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, Stuart Jr. (1981) “On the Evidence, Americans Would Rather Sue Than Settle,” New York Times (July 5) Section 4, 8.Google Scholar
TODD, Harry F. Jr. (1978) “Litigious Marginals: Character and Disputing in a Bavarian Village,” in Nader, L. and Todd, H. (eds.), The Disputing Process—Law in Ten Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
TONDEL, Lyman M. Jr. (1976) “The Work of the American Bar Association Commission on Medical Professional Liability,” 43 Insurance Counsel Journal 545.Google Scholar
YAMAGUCHI, Masao (1977) “Kingship, Theatricality, and Marginal Reality in Japan,” in Jain, R. (ed.), Text and Context: The Social Anthropology of Tradition. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara and Hennessey, Patricia (1975) “Small Claims, Complex Disputes: A Review of the Small Claims Literature,” 9 Law & Society Review 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar