Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:27:17.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Nonsurvey and Partial-Survey Methods:

Extensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2022

Ronald E. Miller  and
Peter D. Blair
Ronald E. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Peter D. Blair
Affiliation:
George Mason University
Get access

Summary

Chapter 10 surveys a range of partial survey and non-survey estimation approaches for creating input–output tables at the regional level. Variants of the commonly used class of estimating procedures using location quotients are reviewed; these presume a regional estimate of input–output data can be derived using some information about a target region. Cross-hauling is discussed and approaches to address it are presented. The RAS technique developed in Chapter 9 is applied using a base national table or a table for another region and some available data for the target region. Techniques for partial survey estimation of commodity flows between regions are also presented along with discussions of several real-world multinational applications, including the China–Japan Transnational Interregional Model and Leontief’s World Model.

Keywords

location quotientspurchases-only location quotientscross-industry quotientssemilogarithmic quotientssupply–demand poolcross-haulingCHARMregional purchase coefficientsgravity model formulationsgeneration of regional input–output tables (GRIT)Double-entry bi-regional input–utput tables (DEBRIOT)
Type
Chapter
Information
Input-Output Analysis
Foundations and Extensions
 , pp. 441 - 500
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguiar, Angel, Chepeliev, Maksym, Coron, Erwin, McDougall, Robert and Van Der Mensbrugghe, Dominique. 2019. “The GTAP Data Base: Version 10,” Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alward, Gregory S. and Palmer, Charles J.. 1983. “IMPLAN: An Input–Output Analysis System for Forest Service Planning.” Proceedings of the First North American Conference on Forest Sector Models, 1981, Williamsburg, Virginia. Oxford: A.B. Academic Publishing, pp. 123–140.Google Scholar
Amano, Kozo and Fujita, Masahisa. 1970. “A Long-Run Economic Effect Analysis of Alternative Transportation Facility Plans – Regional and National,” Journal of Regional Science, 10, 297–323.Google Scholar
Andersson, Åke E. 1975. “A Closed Nonlinear Growth Model for International and Interregional Trade and Location,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 5, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrew, Robbie M. and Peters, Glen P.. 2013. “A Multi-Region Input Table Based on the Global Trade Analysis Project Database (GTAP-MRIO),” Economic Systems Research, 25, 99–121.Google Scholar
Batten, David F. 1982. “The Interregional Linkages Between National and Regional Input–Output Models,” International Regional Science Review, 7, 53–67.Google Scholar
Batten, David F 1983. Spatial Analysis of Interacting Economies. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batten, David F. and Boyce, David E.. 1986. “Spatial Interaction, Transportation, and Interregional Commodity Flow Models,” in Nijkamp, Peter (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume I. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 357–406.Google Scholar
Beyers, William B., Bourque, Philip J., Seyfried, Warren R. and Weeks, Eldon E.. 1970. “Input–Output Tables for the Washington Economy, 1967.” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Bigsten, Arne. 1981. “A Note on the Estimation of Interregional Input–Output Coefficients,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 11, 149–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boero, Ricardo, Edwards, Brian K. and Rivera, Michael K.. 2018. “Regional Input–Output Tables and Trade Flows: An Integrated and Interregional Non-Survey Approach,” Regional Studies, 52, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Jaime. 2005. “Regional Structural Changes in Colombia: An Input–Output Approach,” Bank of Colombia, Working Paper No. 341.Google Scholar
Boomsma, Piet and Oosterhaven, Jan. 1992. “A Double-Entry Method for the Construction of Bi-Regional Input–Output Tables,” Journal of Regional Science, 32, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourque, Philip J., Chambers, Edward J., Chiu, John S. Y., Denman, Frederick L., Dowdle, Barney, Gordon, Guy, Thomas, Morgan, Tiebout, Charles and Weeks, Eldon E.. 1967. “The Washington Economy: An Input–Output Study.” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip J. and Conway, Richard S. Jr. 1977. “The 1972 Washington Input–Output Study.” Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration.Google Scholar
Bourque, Philip J. and Weeks, Eldon E.. 1969. “Detailed Input–Output Tables for Washington State, 1963.” Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Circular 508.Google Scholar
Brand, Steven. 1997. “On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input–Output Tables: A Comment,” Regional Studies, 31, 791–794.Google Scholar
Brown, Douglas M. and Giarratani, Frank. 1979. “Input–Output as a Simple Econometric Model: A Comment,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 621–623.Google Scholar
Canning, Patrick and Wang, Zhi. 2005. “A Flexible Mathematical Programming Model to Estimate Interregional Input–Output Accounts,” Journal of Regional Science, 45, 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Joseph V., Beemiller, Richard N. and Gusteley, Richard D.. 1981. RIMS II: Regional Input–Output Modeling System. Estimation, Evaluation and Application of a Disaggregated Regional Impact Model. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.Google Scholar
Chen, Xikang, Guo, Ju-e and Yang, Cuihong. 2005. “Chinese Economic Development and Input–Output Extension.” Paper presented at the Fifteenth International Input–Output Conference, Beijing, June 27, 2005.Google Scholar
Court, Christa D. and Jackson, Randall. 2015. “Toward Consistent Cross-Hauling Estimation for Input–Output Regionalization,” Working Paper No. 2015-01. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.Google Scholar
Czamanski, Stanislaw and Malizia, Emil E.. 1969. “Applicability and Limitations in the Use of National Input–Output Tables for Regional Studies,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 23, 65–77.Google Scholar
Development Studies Center, Institute of Developing Economies–Japan External Trade Organization [IDE-JETRO]. 2007. Transnational Interregional Input–Output Table between China and Japan, 2000. Asian International Input–Output Series, No. 68. Tokyo: Development Studies Center, IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
Dietzenbacher, Erik, Los, Bart, Stehrer, Robert, Timmer, Marcel and de Vries, Gaaitzen. 2013. “The Construction of the World Input–Output Tables in the WIOD,” Economic Systems Research, 25, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, Faye. 2004. “International Trade: Evolution in the Thought and Analysis of Wassily Leontief,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, Faye. 2005. “A World Trade Model Based on Comparative Advantage with m Regions, n Goods, and k Factors,” Economic Systems Research, 17, 141–162.Google Scholar
Duchin, Faye and Lange, Glenn-Marie. 1994. The Future of the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eding, Gerard J., Oosterhaven, Jan, de Vet, Bas and Nijmeijer, Henk. 1999. “Constructing Regional Supply and Use Tables: Dutch Experiences,” in Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Sonis, Michael, Madden, Moss and Kimura, Yoshio (eds.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Berlin: Springer, pp. 237–263.Google Scholar
Emerson, M. Jarvin. 1969. Interindustry Structure of the Kansas Economy. Topeka, KS: Kansas Office of Economic Analysis and Planning Division, Kansas Department of Economic Development, Report No. 21.Google Scholar
Eskelinen, Heikki and Suorsa, Martti. 1980. “A Note on Estimating Interindustry Flows,” Journal of Regional Science, 20, 261–266.Google Scholar
Eurostat/European Commission. 2008. Eurostat Manual of Supply, Use and Input–Output Tables. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. (March.) Available at www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat under “publications/methodologies and working papers.”Google Scholar
Flegg, Anthony T. and Tohmo, Timo. 2013. “A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg’s ‘Construction of Regional Input–Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling’,” International Regional Science Review, 36, 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flegg, Anthony T. and Tohmo, Timo. 2019. “The Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: A Study of South Korean Regions,” Papers in Regional Science, 98, 601–620.Google Scholar
Flegg, A. T. and Webber, C. D.. 1997. “On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input–Output Tables: Reply,” Regional Studies, 31, 795–805.Google Scholar
Flegg, A. T. and Webber, C. D.. 2000. “Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula,” Regional Studies, 34, 563–569.Google Scholar
Flegg, A. T., Webber, C. D. and Elliott, M. V. 1995. “On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input–Output Tables,” Regional Studies, 29, 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontela, Emilio. 2004. “Leontief and the Future of the World Economy,” in Dietzenbacher, Erik and Lahr, Michael L. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–46.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Takashi. 2017. “A Quantitative Analysis of Regional Income Determinants in Remote Island Economies: Generation and Application of the Regional Input–Output Table,” Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimoto, Takashi. 2019. “Appropriate Assumption on Cross-Hauling National Input–Output Table Regionalization,” Spatial Economic Analysis,” 14, 106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furukawa, Shunichi. 1986. International Input–Output Analysis: Compilation and Case Studies of Interaction between ASEAN, Korea, Japan, and the United States, 1975. IDE Occasional Papers Series No. 21. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.Google Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1976a. Estimation of Stochastic Input–Output Models. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1976b. “Input–Output as a Simple Econometric Model,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, 274–282.Google Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1976c. “Reconciling ‘Rows Only’ and ‘Columns Only’ Coefficients in an Input–Output Model,” International Regional Science Review, 1, 30–46.Google Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1979a. “Input–Output as a Simple Econometric Model: Reply,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1979b. “Reconciling Reconciliation Procedures in Regional Input–Output Analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 4, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerking, Shelby D. 1979c. “Reply to Reconciling Reconciliation Procedures in Regional Input–Output Analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 4, 38–40.Google Scholar
Gerking, Shelby, Isserman, Andrew, Hamilton, Wayne, Pickton, Todd, Smirnov, Oleg and Sorenson, David. 2001. “Anti-Suppressants and the Creation and Use of Non-Survey Regional Input–Output Models,” in Lahr, Michael L. and Miller, Ronald E. (eds.), Regional Science Perspectives in Economic Analysis. A Festschrift in Memory of Benjamin H. Stevens. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 379–406.Google Scholar
Giarratani, Frank. 1975. “A Note on the McMenamin-Haring Input–Output Projection Technique,” Journal of Regional Science, 15, 371–373.Google Scholar
Gordon, Ian R. 1976. “Gravity Demand Functions, Accessibility and Regional Trade,” Regional Studies, 10, 25–37.Google Scholar
Guo, Dong, Webb, Colin and Yamano, Norihiko. 2009. “Towards Harmonised Bilateral Trade Data for Inter-Country Input–Output Analyses: Statistical Issues,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, DSTI/DOC(2009)4. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Joel R., Robison, M. Henry, Whittlesey, Norman K. and Ellis, John. 1994. “Interregional Spillovers in Regional Impact Assessment: New Mexico, Texas, and the Supreme Court,” Growth and Change, 25, 75–89.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. Lee and Tiebout, Charles M.. 1963. “An Intersectoral Flows Analysis of the California Economy,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 45, 409–418.Google Scholar
Harrigan, Frank, McGilvray, James W. and McNicoll, Iain H.. 1981. “The Estimation of Interregional Trade Flows,” Journal of Regional Science, 21, 65–78.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. 1969. “Regional Input–Output Models Using National Data: The Structure of the West Midlands Economy,” Annals of Regional Science, 3, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. 1971. “Regional Input–Output Models in the UK: Some Problems and Prospects for the Use of Nonsurvey Techniques,” Regional Studies, 5, 11–22.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. 1977. “Evaluating the Possibilities for Exchanging Regional Input–Output Coefficients,” Environment and Planning A, 9, 927–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. 1985. Regional Input–Output Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. and Janson, Bruce N.. 1980. “Exchanging Regional Input–Output Coefficients: A Reply and Further Comments,” Environment and Planning A, 12, 843–854.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D. and Jensen, Rodney C.. 1986. “Regional, Interregional and Multiregional Input–Output Analysis,” in Nijkamp, Peter (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume I. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 295–355.Google Scholar
Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., Okuyama, Yasuhide and Sonis, Michael. 2001. “Economic Interdependence within the Chicago Metropolitan Area: A Miyazawa Analysis,” Journal of Regional Science, 41, 195–217.Google Scholar
Hoen, Alex R. 2002. An Input–Output Analysis of European Integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Hulu, Edison and Hewings, Geoffrey J. D.. 1993. “The Development and Use of Interregional Input–Output Models for Indonesia under Conditions of Limited Information,” Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 5, 135–153.Google Scholar
IDE-JETRO. 2003. Multi-Regional Input–Output Model for China 2000. Institute of Developing Economies–Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO) (IDE Statistical Data Series No. 86.) Chiba (Tokyo), Japan: IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
IDE-JETRO. 2006a. Asian International Input–Output Table 2000. Vol. 1 “Explanatory Notes” (IDE Statistical Data Series No. 89). Chiba (Tokyo), Japan: IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
IDE-JETRO. 2006b. Asian International Input–Output Table 2000. Vol. 2 “Data” (IDE Statistical Data Series No. 90). Chiba (Tokyo), Japan: IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
IDE-JETRO. 2013. Asian International Input–Output Table, 2005. “Vol. 1 “Technical Notes,” (IDE Statistical Data Series No. 98). Chiba (Tokyo), Japan: IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
Inomata, Satoshi and Kuwamori, Hiroshi (eds.). 2007. Papers and Proceedings of the International Workshop: Emergence of Chinese Economy and Re-organization of Asian Industrial Structure. Asian International Input–Output Series, No. 69. Tokyo: Development Studies Center, IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
Inomata, Satoshi and Meng, Bo. 2013. “Transnational Interregional Input–Output Tables: An Alternative Approach to MRIO?” in: Murray, J. and Lenzen, M. (eds.), The Sustainability Practitioner’s Guide to Multi-regional Input–Output Analysis. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
Inomata, Satoshi and Sato, Hajime. 2007. “Introduction to 2000 Transnational Interregional Input–Output Table between China and Japan.” Paper presented to the Sixteenth International Conference of the International Input–Output Association, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
Isard, Walter and Langford, Thomas. 1971. Regional Input–Output Study: Recollections, Reflections, and Diverse Notes on the Philadelphia Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Randall W. 1998. “Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts,” Economic Systems Research, 10, 223–238.Google Scholar
Jackson, Randall W. 2014. “Cross-Hauling in Input–Output Tables: Comments on CHARM.” Working Paper 2014-02. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University. Morgantown, WV.Google Scholar
Jackson, Randall W. 2020. IO-Snap Cross-Hauling Adjustment. IO-Snap Technical Document 2020-3. Morgantown, WV: EconAlyze LLC.Google Scholar
Jackson, Randall W., Schwarm, Walter R., Okuyama, Yasuhide and Islam, Samia. 2006. “A Method for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices,” Annals of Regional Science, 40, 909–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Malte, Flegg, Anthony T. and Tohmo, Timo. 2020. “Testing and Implementing a New Approach to Estimating Interregional Output Multipliers Using Input–Output Data for South Korean Regions,” Spatial Economic Analysis, 15, 165–185.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rodney C., Mandeville, T. D. and Karunaratne, N. D.. 1979. Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input–Output Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rodney C. and McGaurr, D.. 1976. “Reconciliation of Purchases and Sales Estimates in an Input–Output Table,” Urban Studies, 13, 59–65.Google Scholar
Jensen, Rodney C. and McGaurr, D.. 1977. “Reconciliation Techniques in Input–Output Analysis: Some Comparisons and Implications,” Urban Studies, 14, 327–337.Google Scholar
Kowalewksi, Julia. 2015. “Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula,” Regional Studies, 49, 240–250.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, Tobias. 2009. “Construction of Regional Input–Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling,” International Regional Science Review, 32, 40–64.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, Tobias. 2012. “Regional Input–Output Models and the Treatment of Imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA),” Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, 32, 175–191.Google Scholar
Kuwamori, Hiroshi. 2007. “Industrial Linkages between China and Asian Countries,” in Inomata, Satoshi and Kuwamori, Hiroshi (eds.), Papers and Proceedings of the International Workshop: Emergence of Chinese Economy and Re-organization of Asian Industrial Structure. Asian International Input–Output Series, No. 69. Tokyo: Development Studies Center, IDE-JETRO, pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Kuwamori, Hiroshi and Meng, Bo (eds.). 2006. The Industrial Structure of the Asia-Pacific Region (V). Papers and Proceedings of the International Workshop: Frontiers of International Input–Output Analysis – A Challenge of the 2000 Asian I-O Table. Asian International Input–Output Series, No. 67. Tokyo: Development Studies Center, IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
Lahr, Michael L. 1993. “A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input–Output Tables,” Economic Systems Research, 5, 277–293.Google Scholar
Lahr, Michael L. 2001. “Reconciling Domestication Techniques, the Notion of Re-exports, and Some Comments on Regional Accounting,” Economic Systems Research, 13, 165–179.Google Scholar
Lahr, Michael L., Ferreira, João-Pedro and Többen, Johannes R.. 2020. “Intraregional Trade Shares for Goods-Producing Industries: RPC Estimates Using EU Data,” Papers in Regional Science, 99, 1583–1605.Google Scholar
Lenzen, Manfred, Kanemoto, Keiichiro, Moran, Daniel and Geschke, Arne. 2012. “Mapping the Structure of the World Economy.” Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 8374–8381.Google Scholar
Lenzen, Manfred, Moran, Daniel, Kanemoto, Keiichiro and Geschke, Arne. 2013. “Building EORA: A Global Multi-Region Input–Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution,” Economic Systems Research, 25, 20–49.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1966. Input–Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1974. “Structure of the World Economy: Outline of a Simple Input–Output Formulation,” American Economic Review, 64, 823–834.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Carter, Anne P. and Petri, Peter. 1977. The Future of the World Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily and Duchin, Faye. 1983. Military Spending: Facts and Figures and Prospects for the Future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Koo, James C. M., Nasar, Sylvia and Sohn, Ira. 1983. The Future of Non-fuel Minerals in the U.S. and World Economy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, Mariscal, Jorge and Sohn, Ira. 1983. “Prospects for the Soviet Economy to the Year 2000,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily and Strout, Alan. 1963. “Multiregional Input–Output Analysis,” in Barna, Tibor (ed.), Structural Interdependence and Economic Development. London: Macmillan (St. Martin’s Press), pp. 119–149. (Reprinted in Wassily W Leontief. 1966. Input–Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–257.)Google Scholar
Lindall, Scott, Olson, Doug and Alward, Greg. 2006. “Deriving Multi-Regional Models Using the IMPLAN National Trade Flows Model,” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 36, 76–83.Google Scholar
Liu, Louie Nan and Vilain, Pierre. 2004. “Estimating Commodity Inflows to a Substate Region Using Input–Output Data: Commodity Flow Survey Accuracy Tests,” Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 7, 23–37.Google Scholar
Malizia, Emil and Bond, Daniel L.. 1974. “Empirical Tests of the RAS Method of Interindustry Coefficient Adjustment,” Journal of Regional Science, 14, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Philip and Dewhurst, John H. LI.. 1998. “Regional Size, Industrial Location and Input–Output Expenditure Coefficients,” Regional Studies, 32, 435–444.Google Scholar
McMenamin, David G. and Haring, Joseph E.. 1974. “An Appraisal of Nonsurvey Techniques for Estimating Regional Input–Output Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 14, 191–205.Google Scholar
Meng, Bo, Sato, Hajime, Nakamura, Jun, Okamoto, Nobuhiro, Kuwamore, Hiroshi and Inomata, Satoshi. 2006. “Interindustrial Structure of the Asia-Pacific Region: Growth and Integration, by Using 2000 AIO Table.” Discussion Paper No. 50. Tokyo: IDE-JETRO.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H. 1976. “Comments on Recent Developments in Regional Input–Output Analysis,” International Regional Science Review, 1, 47–55.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H. 1979. “Comment on ‘Reconciling Reconciliation Procedures in Regional Input–Output Analysis’,” International Regional Science Review, 4, 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miernyk, William H., Bonner, Ernest R., Chapman, John H. Jr. and Shellhammer, Kenneth. 1967. Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input–Output Analysis. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Library.Google Scholar
Miernyk, William H., Shellhammer, Kenneth L., Brown, Douglas M., Coccari, Ronald L., Gallagher, Charles J. and Wineman, Wesley H.. 1970. Simulating Regional Economic Development: An Interindustry Analysis of the West Virginia Economy. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
Morrison, William I. and Smith, P.. 1974. “Nonsurvey Input–Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation,” Journal of Regional Science, 14, 1–14.Google Scholar
Murray, Joy and Lenzen, Manfred (eds.). 2013, The Sustainability Practitioner’s Guide to Multi-regional Input–Output Analysis. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevin, E. T., Roe, A. R. and Round, Jeffery I.. 1966. The Structure of the Welsh Economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Nobuhiro and Ihara, Takeo (eds.). 2005. Spatial Structure and Regional Development in China. An Interregional Input–Output Approach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan (for IDE/JETRO).Google Scholar
Okamoto, Nobuhiro and Zhang, Yaxiong. 2003. “Compilation Procedure of Multi-regional Input–Output Model for China 2000,” in Institute of Developing Economies–Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO). Multi-Regional Input–Output Model for China 2000. (IDE Statistical Data Series No. 86.) Chiba (Tokyo), Japan: IDE-JETRO, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan. 1981. Interregional Input–Output Analysis and Dutch Regional Policy Problems. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan. 2019. Rethinking Input–Output Analysis. A Spatial Perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Oosterhaven, Jan and Stelder, Dirk. 2007. “Evaluation of Non-Survey International IO Construction Methods with the Asian-Pacific Input–Output Table,” in Inomata, Satoshi and Kuwamori, Hiroshi (eds.). Papers and Proceedings of the International Workshop: Emergence of Chinese Economy and Re-organization of Asian Industrial Structure. Asian International Input–Output Series, No. 69. Tokyo: Development Studies Center, IDEJETRO, pp. 243–259.Google Scholar
Owen, Anne. 2017. Techniques for Evaluating the Differences in Multiregional Input–Output Databases. A Comparative Evaluation of CO2 Consumption-Based Accounts Calculated Using Eora, GTAP and WIOD. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
Park, JiYoung, Gordon, Peter, Moore, James E. II, Richardson, Harry W and Wang, Lanlan. 2007. “Simulating the State-by-State Effects of Terrorist Attacks on Three Major U.S. Ports: Applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model),” in Richardson, Harry W., Gordon, Peter and Moore, James E. II (eds.), The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 208–234.Google Scholar
Park, JiYoung and Richardson, Harry W.. 2015. “Refining the Isard Multiregional Input–Output Model: Theory, Operationality and Extensions,” in Nijkamp, Peter, Rose, Adam and Kourtit, Karima (eds.), Regional Science Matters. Studies Dedicated to Walter Isard. Cham, Switzerland: Spring Verlag Publishing, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
Peters, Glenn P., Andrew, Robbie and Lennox, James. 2011. “Constructing an Environmentally Extended Multi-Regional Input–Output Table Using the GTAP Database,” Economic Systems Research, 23, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1970a. “An Empirical Test of Interregional Input–Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production,” American Economic Review, 60, 76–82.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. 1970b. “Empirical Implementation of a Multiregional Input–Output Gravity Trade Model,” in Carter, Anne P. and Bródy, Andrew (eds.), Contributions to Input–Output Analysis, Vol. 1 of Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques, Geneva, 1968. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 143–163.Google Scholar
Polenske, Karen R. and Chen, Xikang (eds.). 1991. Chinese Economic Planning and Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Remond-Tiedrez, Isabelle and Rueda-Cantuche, José M. (eds.). 2019. EU Inter-Country Supply, Use and Input–Output Tables – Full International and Global Accounts for Research in Input-Output Analysis (FIGARO). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harry W. 1985. “Input–Output Multipliers: Looking Backward and Forward,” Journal of Regional Science, 25, 607–661.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harry W., Gordon, Peter and Moore, James E. II (eds.). 2007. The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harry W., Gordon, Peter, Moore, James E. II, Kim, SooJung, Park, JiYoung and Pan, Qisheng. 2007. “Tourism and Terrorism: The National and Interregional Economic Impacts of Attacks on Major U.S. Theme Parks,” in Richardson, Harry W., Gordon, Peter and Moore, James E. II (eds.), The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 235–256.Google Scholar
Richardson, Harry W., Pan, Qisheng, Park, JiYoung and Moore, James E. II. 2015. Regional Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks, Natural Disasters and Metropolitan Policies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag Publishing.Google Scholar
Riddington, Geoff, Gibson, Hervey and Anderson, John. 2006. “Comparison of Gravity Model, Survey and Location Quotient-based Local Area Tables and Multipliers,” Regional Studies, 40, 1069–1081.Google Scholar
Robison, M. Henry. 1997. “Community Input–Output Models for Rural Area Analysis with an Example from Central Idaho,” Annals of Regional Science, 31, 325–351.Google Scholar
Robison, M. Henry and Miller, Jon R.. 1988. “Cross-Hauling and Nonsurvey Input–Output Models: Some Lessons from Small-Area Timber Economies,” Environment and Planning A, 20, 1523–1530.Google Scholar
Robison, M. Henry and Miller, Jon R.. 1991. “Central Place Theory and Intercommunity Input–Output Analysis,” Papers in Regional Science, 70, 399–417.Google Scholar
Round, Jeffery I. 1972. “Regional Input–Output Models in the UK: A Reappraisal of Some Techniques,” Regional Studies, 6, 1–9.Google Scholar
Round, Jeffery I. 1978a. “An Interregional Input–Output Approach to the Evaluation of Nonsurvey Methods,” Journal of Regional Science, 18, 179–194.Google Scholar
Round, Jeffery I. 1978b. “On Estimating Trade Flows in Interregional Input–Output Models,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 8, 289–302.Google Scholar
Round, Jeffery I. 1979. “Compensating Feedback Effects in Interregional Input–Output Models,” Journal of Regional Science, 19, 145–155.Google Scholar
Round, Jeffery I. 1983. “Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence,” International Regional Science Review, 8, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, Takao and Osada, Hiroshi (eds.). 1998. Deepening Industrial Linkages Among East Asian Countries, in the Light of International Input–Output Analysis. IDE Spot Survey. Tokyo: IDE.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Charles and Miller, Ronald E.. 1983. “Experiments in Regionalization of a National Input–Output Table,” Environment and Planning A, 15, 1501–1520.Google Scholar
Schaffer, William and Kong, Chu. 1969. “Nonsurvey Techniques for Constructing Regional Interindustry Models,” Papers, Regional Science Association, 23, 83–101.Google Scholar
Schilderinck, J. H. F 1984. “Interregional Structure of the European Community, Part II, Interregional Input–Output Tables of the European Community, 1959, 1965, 1970 and 1975,” Research Memorandum FEW 165, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.Google Scholar
Schwarm, Walter R., Jackson, Randall W and Okuyama, Yasuhide. 2006. “An Evaluation of Method [sic] for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices,” Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 36, 84–93.Google Scholar
Smith, P. and Morrison, William I.. 1974. Simulating the Urban Economy. London: Pion.Google Scholar
Snickars, Folke. 1979. “Construction of Interregional Input–Output Tables by Efficient Information Adding,” in Bartels, Cornells P. A. and Ketellapper, Ronald H. (eds.), Exploratory and Explanatory Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 73–112.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H. and Trainer, Glynnis A.. 1976. “The Generation of Error in Regional Input–Output Impact Models.” Working Paper No. Al-76, Regional Science Research Institute, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H. and Trainer, Glynnis A.. 1980. “Error Generation in Regional Input–Output Analysis and Its Implications for Nonsurvey Models,” in Pleeter, Saul (ed.), Economic Impact Analysis: Methodology and Applications. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 68–84.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H., Treyz, George I., Ehrlich, David J. and Bower, James R.. 1983. “A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input–Output Models and Comparison with Two Survey-Based Models,” International Regional Science Review, 8, 271–286.Google Scholar
Stevens, Benjamin H., Treyz, George I. and Lahr, Michael L.. 1989. “On the Comparative Accuracy of RPC Estimating Techniques,” in Miller, Ronald E., Polenske, Karen R. and Rose, Adam Z. (eds.), Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–257.Google Scholar
Szyrmer, Janusz. 1989. “Trade-Off between Error and Information in the RAS Procedure,” in Miller, Ronald E., Polenske, Karen R. and Rose, Adam Z. (eds.), Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 258–278.Google Scholar
Theil, Henri. 1967. Economics and Information Theory. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Thumann, R. G. 1978. “A Comment on ‘Evaluating the Possibilities for Exchanging Regional Input–Output Coefficients’,” Environment and Planning A, 10, 321–325.Google Scholar
Timmer, Marcel P., Dietzenbacher, Erik, Los, Bart, Stehrer, Robert and de Vries, Gaaitzen J.. 2015. “An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production,” Review of International Economics, 23, 575–605.Google Scholar
Többen, Johannes R. and Kronenberg, Tobias H.. 2015. “Construction of Multi-Regional Input–Output Tables Using the CHARM Method,” Economic Systems Research, 27, 487–507.Google Scholar
Tohmo, Timo. 2004. “New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input–Output Coefficients and Multipliers,” Regional Studies, 38, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toyomane, Norimichi. 1988. Multiregional Input–Output Models in Long-Run Simulation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tukker, Arnold and Dietzenbacher, Erik. 2013. “Global Multiregional Input–Output Frameworks: An Introduction,” Economic Systems Research, 25, 1–19.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 1973. Brief Outline of the United Nations Study on the Impact of Prospective Environmental Issues and Policies on the International Development Strategy. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2018. Handbook on Supply, Use and Input–Output Tables with Extensions and Applications. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 74, rev. 1. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Uribe, Pedro, de Leeuw, C. G and Theil, Henri. 1966. “The Information Approach to the Prediction of Interregional Trade Flows,” Review of Economic Studies, 33, 209–220.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. 1993. 1993 Commodity Flow Survey, CD-CFS-93–1. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2013. RIMS II User Guide. (December).Google Scholar
Van der Linden, Jan A. and Oosterhaven, Jan. 1995. “European Community Intercountry Input–Output Relations: Construction Method and Main Results for 1965–1985,” Economic Systems Research, 7, 249–269.Google Scholar
Vanwynsberghe, D. 1976. “An Operational Nonsurvey Technique for Estimating a Coherent Set of Interregional Input–Output Tables,” in Polenske, Karen R. and Skolka, Jiff V. (eds.), Advances in Input–Output Analysis. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques. Vienna, April 22–26, 1974. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 279–294.Google Scholar
West, Guy R. 1990. “Regional Trade Estimation: A Hybrid Approach,” International Regional Science Review, 13, 103–118.Google Scholar
West, Guy R., Morison, J. B. and Jensen, Rodney C.. 1982. “An Interregional Input–Output Table for Queensland, 1978/79. GRIT III.” Report to the Department of Commercial and Industrial Development, Department of Economics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland (October).Google Scholar
Wiebe, Kirsten S., Lutz, Christian, Bruckner, Martin and Giljum, Stefan. 2013. “The Global Research Accounting Model (GRAM),” in Murray, Joy and Lenzen, Manfred (eds.), The Sustainability Practitioner’s Guide to Multi-regional Input–Output Analysis. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing, Chapter 9, pp. 81–89.Google Scholar
Wilson, Alan. 1970. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Pion.Google Scholar
Wonnacott, Ronald J. 1961. Canadian American Dependence: An Interindustry Analysis of Production and Prices. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
WTO and IDE-JETRO. 2011. Trade Patterns and Global Value Chains in East Asia: from Trade in Goods to Trade in Tasks. World Trade Organization (WTO) and Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (IDE-JETRO). Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×