Abbott, A. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abu-Lugod, L. 1986. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Abu-Lughod, L. 2006 [1991]. “Writing against Culture,” in Moore, H. L. and Sanders, T. (eds.), Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology, pp. 466–479. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 1996. “Beyond Human Rights,” in Virno, P. and Hardt, M. (eds.), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, pp. 159–165. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Akan, M. 2009. “Laïcité and Multiculturalism: The Stasi Report in Context,” British Journal of Sociology 60(2): 237–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ali, S. and Gidley, B. 2014. Advancing Outcomes for All Minorities: Experiences of Mainstreaming Immigrant Integration Policy in the United Kingdom. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.Google Scholar

Amiraux, V. and Simon, P. 2006. “There Are No Minorities Here: Cultures of Scholarship and Public Debate on Immigrants and Integration in France,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47(3–4): 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Appiah, K. A. 1992. In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1978. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt & Brace.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 2013. Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Asad, T. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Augé, M. 1999. A Sense for the Other: The Timeliness and Relevance of Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, 1972. The City of God. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Aumüller, J. 2009. Assimilation: Kontroversen um ein migrationspolitisches Konzept. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Back, L. , Keith, M., Khan, A., Shukra, K., and Solomos, J. 2002. “The Return of Assimilationism: Race, Multiculturalism and New Labour,” Sociological Research Online 7(2): www. socresonline. org. uk/7/2/back. html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badiou, A. 2005a. Metapolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Badiou, A. 2005b. Being and Event. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. 1998. “The Fire Next Time,” in Collected Essays, pp. 291–348. New York: Literary Classics of the United States.Google Scholar

Balibar, E. 1988. “Propositions on Citizenship,” Ethics 98: 723–730.Google Scholar

Balibar, E. 1991. “Is There a Neo-Racism?” in Balibar, E. and Wallerstein, I. (eds.), Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, pp. 17–28. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Balibar, E. 2002. Droit de cité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Balibar, E. 2004. We, the People of Europe: Reflections on Transnational Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Banton, M. 1977. The Idea of Race. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Barker, M. 1981. The New Racism: Conservatives and the Ideology of the Tribe. Frederick, MD: Aletheia Books.Google Scholar

Barsch, A. and Hejl, P. M. (eds.) 2000. Menschenbilder: Zur Pluralisierung der Vorstellung von der menschlichen Natur (1850–1914). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Bauböck, R. (ed.) 1994. From Aliens to Citizens: Redefining the Status of Citizens in Europe. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1989. De moderne tijd en de holocaust. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baumann, G. 1996. Contesting Culture: Discourses of Identity in Multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beck, U. 2002a. Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter: Neue weltpolitische Ökonomie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Beck, U. 2002b. “The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited,” Theory, Culture & Society 19(4): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benz, W. and Houwink ten Cate, J. (eds.) 1998. Die Bürokratie der Okkupation: Strukturen der Herrschaft und Verwaltung im besetzten Europa. Berlin: Metropol.Google Scholar

Benz, W., Houwink ten Cate, J., and Otto, G. 1998. Die Bürokratie der Okkupation: Strukturen der Herrschaft und Verwaltung im besetzten Europa. Berlin: Metropol.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, L. van den et al. 2006. The Safe City: Safety and Urban Development in European Cities. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Berg, M. A. van den and Schinkel, W. 2009. “‘Women from the Catacombs of the City.’ Gender Notions in Dutch Culturist Discourse,” Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research 22(4): 393–410.Google Scholar

Berghe, P. L. van den 1968. Race and Racism: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Berghe, P. L. van den 1970. Race and Ethnicity: Essays in Comparative Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bertossi, C. 2011. “National Models of Integration in Europe: A Comparative and Critical Analysis,” American Behavioral Scientist 55(12): 1561–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bijl, R. and Verweij, A. (eds.) 2012. Measuring and Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Europe. The Hague: SCP.Google Scholar

Bjornson, M. 2007. “Speaking of Citizenship: Language Ideologies in Dutch Citizenship Regimes,” Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology 49: 65–80.Google Scholar

Black, A. 2001. The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, R. 1997. The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492–1800. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Blanchot, M. 1988. L’espace littéraire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Blau, P. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Blom, J. C. H. 1989. “The Persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands: A Comparative Western European Perspective,” European History Quarterly 19: 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, F. 1910. “The Real Race Problem,” Crisis 1(December): 22–25.Google Scholar

Boas, F. 1928. Anthropology and Modern Life. Mineola, NY: New York.Google Scholar

Boersma, S. and Schinkel, W. 2015. “Imagining Society: Logics of Visualization in Images of Immigrant Integration,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33(6): 1043–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogardus, E. 1925. “Social Distance and Its Origins,” Journal of Applied Sociology 9: 216–226.Google Scholar

Bommes, M. 1996. “Die Beobachtung von Kultur,” in Klingemann, C. et al. (eds.), Jahrbuch für Soziologiegeschichte 1994, pp. 205–226. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosniak, L. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1975. “Méthode scientifique et hiérarchie sociale des objets,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1(1): 4–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Bowen, J. R. 2007a. A View from France on the Internal Complexity of National Models,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(6): 1003–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, J. R. 2007b. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bracke, S. and Fadil, N. 2009. “Tussen dogma en Realiteit: Secularisme, multiculturalisme en nationalisme in Vlaanderen,” in Arnout, K. et al. (eds.), Een leeuw in een kooi: De grenzen van het multiculturele Vlaanderen, pp. 93–110. Antwerp: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar

Brouwer, A. 2006. Groene Amsterdammer 130(23), June 9: 5.Google Scholar

Brown, W. 2006a. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. 2006b. “American Nightmare: Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, and De-Democratization,” Political Theory 34(6): 690–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brubaker, R. 1989. Immigration and the Politics of Citizenship in Europe and America. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Brubaker, R. 2001. “The Return of Assimilation?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(4): 531–548.Google Scholar

Brubaker, R. 2012. “Categories of Analysis and Categories of Practice: A Note on the Study of Muslims in European Countries of Immigration,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Buck-Morss, S. 2000. Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunzl, M. 2007. Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: Hatreds Old and New in Europe. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

Burawoy, M. 2005. “2004 American Sociological Association Presidential Address: For Public Sociology,” British Journal of Sociology 56(2): 259–294.Google Scholar

Burguière, A. et al. (eds.) 1996. A History of the Family, 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Harvard.Google Scholar

Buruma, I. 2006. Murder in Amsterdam: The Death of Theo van Gogh and the Limits of Tolerance. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bussemaker, J. 1998. “Vocabularies of Citizenship and Gender: The Netherlands,” Critical Social Policy 18(56): 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, J. 2007. Opgefokte taal: Een politiek van de performatief. Amsterdam: Parrèsia.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 2010. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.Google Scholar

Caillé, A. 2007. “Introduction to Symposium,” European Journal of Social Theory 10(2): 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldwell, C. 2009. Reflections on the Revolution in Europe: Immigration, Islam and the West. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. 1995. Critical Social Theory: Culture, History, and the Challenge of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. 1997. Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. 2003. “‘Belonging’ in the Cosmopolitan Imaginary,” Ethnicities 3(4): 531–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calhoun, C. 2005. “The Promise of Public Sociology,” British Journal of Sociology 56(3): 355–362.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. 2009. “Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism,” in Schinkel, W. (ed.), Globalization and the State: Sociological Perspectives on the State of the State, pp. 209–242.Google Scholar

Calhoun, C., Juergensmeyer, M., and VanAntwerpen, J. (eds.) 2009. Rethinking Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. 2011. “Speech at Munich Security Conference,” www.britishpoliticalspeech.org/speech-archive.htm?speech=329.Google Scholar

Carter, R. 2007. “Genes, Genomes and Genealogies: The Return of Scientific Racism?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(4): 546–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, E. S. 2000. Imagining: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Castles, S. 2000. Ethnicity and Globalization: From Migrant Worker to Transnational Citizen. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castles, S. and Miller, M. J. 2003. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, C. 1987. The Imaginary Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, C. 1997. “Reflections on Racism,” in World in Fragments, pp. 19–31. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. 2000. Genes, Peoples, and Languages. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar

CBS 2008. “Minder migratiehuwelijken Turken en Marokkanen,” Webmagazine CBS: www. cbs. nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/dossiers/allochtonen/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2008/2008–2350-wm. htm (accessed September 7, 2015).Google Scholar

CBS 2014. Jaarrapport Integratie 2014. The Hague/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar

CBS & WODC 2006. Integratiekaart 2006. The Hague: WODC.Google Scholar

Claessens, D. and Claessens, K. 1979. Kapitalismus als Kultur: Enstehung und Grundlagen der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Cliteur, P. 2007. Moreel Esperanto: Naar een autonome ethiek. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Collins, R. 2004. “Rituals of Solidarity and Security in the Wake of a Terrorist Attack,” Sociological Theory 22(1): 53–87.Google Scholar

Comaroff, J. L. and Comaroff, J. 2009. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dagevos, J. M., Iedema, J., and Schellingerhout, R. 2005. “Gescheiden Werelden? De Etnische Signatuur van Vrijetijdscontacten van Minderheden,” Sociologie 1: 52–69.Google Scholar

Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Dean, M. 2007. Governing Societies: Political Perspectives on Domestic and International Rule. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Debord, G. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Delanty, G. 2007. “European Citizenship: A Critical Assessment,” Citizenship Studies 11(3): 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1966. Le bergsonisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1974. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1981. “Plato’s Pharmacy,” in Dissemination, pp. 67–186. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 2003. “Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides,” in Borradori, G. (ed.), Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 2005. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1950. Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Dijk, T. A. van 2002a. “Denying Racism: Elite Discourse and Racism,” in Essed, P. and Goldberg, D. T. (eds.). Race Critical Theories, pp. 307–324. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dijk, T. A. van 2002b. “Reflections on ‘Denying Racism: Elite Discourse and Racism’,” in Essed, P. and Goldberg, D. T. (eds.). Race Critical Theories, pp. 481–485. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. 1996. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dower, N. 2000. “The Idea of Global Citizenship – A Sympathetic Assessment,” Global Society 14(4): 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drachsler, J. 1921. Intermarriage in New York City. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Driouichi, F. 2007. De casus Inburgering en Nationaliteitswetgeving. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. 2005. Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar

Dutch Cabinet 2011. Integratienota Integratie, binding, burgerschap. The Hague.Google Scholar

Dutch Cabinet 2013. Agenda integratie. The Hague.Google Scholar

Duyvendak, J. W. and Uitermark, J. 2006. Ruimte maken voor straatburgerschap. Sociale Integratie … straataanpak in de praktijk. Essay Mensen Maken de Stad. Rotterdam: Project Sociale Integratie.Google Scholar

Duyvendak, W. G. J. and Scholten, P. W. A. 2011. “Beyond National Models of Integration: The Coproduction of Integration Policy Frames in the Netherlands,” Journal of International Migration and Integration 13(1).Google Scholar

Eberhardt, J. L. 2005. “Imagining Race,” American Psychologist 60(2): 181–190.Google Scholar

ECRI 2008. Third Report on the Netherlands. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Elias, N. 1982. Problemen van betrokkenheid en distantie. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.Google Scholar

Engbersen, G. B. M. and Gabriëls, R. (eds.) 1995. Sferen van integratie: Naar een gedifferentieerd allochtonenbeleid. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar

Engbersen, G. and de Haan, J. 2006. “Sociologische perspectieven in de Nederlandse sociologie,” in Engbersen, G. and de Haan, J. (eds.). Balans en toekomst van de sociologie. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications.Google Scholar

Entzinger, H. 1984. Het Minderhedenbeleid. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar

Entzinger, H. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism: The Case of the Netherlands,” in Towards Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States, pp. 59–86. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Erlanger, S. 2011. “Amid Rise of Multiculturalism, Dutch Confront Their Questions of Identity,” The New York Times, August 14, p. A6.Google Scholar

Ersanilli, E. and Koopmans, R. 2010. “Rewarding Integration? Citizenship Regulations and the Socio-Cultural Integration of Immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(5): 773–791.Google Scholar

Esposito, J. L. 2005. Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Essed, P. 1991. Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar

Essed, P. and Goldberg, D. T. (eds.) 2002. Race Critical Theories. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Essed, P. and Nimako, K. 2006. “Designs and (Co)Incidents. Cultures of Scholarship and Public Policy on Immigrants/Minorities in the Netherlands,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47(3–4): 281–312.Google Scholar

Essed, P. and Trienekens, S. 2008. “‘Who Wants to Feel White?’ Race, Dutch Culture and Contested Identities,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 31(1): 52–72.Google Scholar

Estonian Ministry of Culture 2011. Estonian Integration Monitoring 2011. Tartu: Praxis Center for Policy Studies, University of Tartu.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1993. The Spirit of Community. New York: Crown Books.Google Scholar

Eyerman, R. 2008. The Assassination of Theo van Gogh: From Social Drama to Cultural Trauma. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Ezrahi, Y. 2015. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falk, R. 2003. “Recasting Citizenship,” in Robertson, R. and White, K. A. (eds.). Globalization: Critical Concepts in Sociology, Volume III: Global Membership and Participation, pp. 93–106. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fanon, F. 2006. Pour la révolution africaine: Écrits politiques. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Fassin, E. 2012. Démocratie précaire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Favell, A. 2001a. “Integration Policy and Research in Europe: A Review and Critique,” in Aleinikoff, T. A. and Klusmeyer, D. (eds.). Citizenship Today: Global Perspectives and Practices, pp. 349–399. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution & Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Favell, A. 2001b. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Favell, A. 2003. “Integration Nations: The Nation-State and Research on Immigrants in Western Europe,” Comparative Social Research 22: 13–42.Google Scholar

Fermin, A. 1997. Nederlandse politieke partijen over minderhedenbeleid, 1977–1995. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar

Fields, B. J. 1990. “Slavery, Race and Ideology in the United States of America,” New Left Review 181(May/June): 95–118.Google Scholar

Finkielkraut, A. 1987. La défaite de la pensée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Fiske, J. 1998. “Surveilling the City: Whiteness, the Black Man and Democratic Totalitarianism,” Theory, Culture & Society 15(2): 67–88.Google Scholar

Fong, E. and Isajiw, W. W. 2000. “Determinants of Friendship Choices in Multiethnic Society,” Sociological Forum 15(2): 249–271.Google Scholar

Foner, N. 2005. In a New Land: A Comparative View of Migration. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar

Fortuyn, P. 1997. Tegen de islamitisering van onze cultuur [Against the islamicization of our culture]. Utrecht: Bruna.Google Scholar

Fortuyn, P. 2002a. De puinhopen van acht jaar paars. Uithoorn: Karakter Uitgevers.Google Scholar

Fortuyn, P. 2002b. “Grens dicht voor islamiet,” De Volkskrant, 9 February.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1971. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality,” in Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. (eds.). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1994. Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3 (ed. Faubion, J. D.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1997a. “Il faut défendre la société.” Cours au Collège de France. 1976. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1997b. “What Is Enlightenment?,” in Rabinow, P. (ed.). The Foucault Reader, pp. 32–50. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 2004a. Sécurité, territoire, population: Cours au Collège de France, 1977–1978. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 2004b. Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1979. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. 1995. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a Post-Socialist Age,” New Left Review 212: 68–93.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. 1998. “Contract versus Charity: Why Is There No Social Citizenship in the United States?,” in Shafir, G. (ed.). The Citizenship Debates: A Reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Frattini, F. 2007. “A Common Approach for European Policy on the Integration of Migrants – European Debate,” Potsdam: Informal Meeting of EU Integration Ministers, May 10, 2007.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, G. M. 2002. Racism: A Short History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, S. 2001. Against Essentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. 2005. “A Year of Living Dangerously,” The Wall Street Journal, November 2.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Garton Ash, T. 2006. “Islam in Europe,” New York Review of Books 53(15): 32–35.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. 2004. “What Is a State If It Is Not a Sovereign?,” Current Anthropology 45(5): 577–593.Google Scholar

Gellner, E. 1970. “Concepts and Society,” in Emmett, D. and Macintyre, A. (eds.). Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis, pp. 115–149. London: Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Geschiere, P. 2009. The Perils of Belonging: Autochthony, Citizenship and Exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ghorashi, H. 2003. “Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Daring or Dogmatic? Debates on Multiculturalism and Emancipation in the Netherlands.” Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 42: 163–169.Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. 1992. “The End of Anti-Racism,” in Donald, J. and Rattansi, A. (eds.). “Race,” Culture and Difference. London: Sage, pp. 49–61.Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. 2000. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Colour Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Glick Schiller, N., Çagdar, A. and Guldbrandsen, T. C. 2008. “Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation,” American Ethnologist 33(4): 612–633.Google Scholar

Gordon, M. M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. 1989. New Right, New Racism. London: Searchlight.Google Scholar

Gorski, P. 2000. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700,” American Journal of Sociology 65(1): 138–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gossett, T. F. 1963. Race: The History of an Idea in America. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar

Gouda, F. 1995. Dutch Culture Overseas: Colonial Practice in the Netherlands Indies 1900–1942. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Gowricharn, R. 1998. Hollandse contrasten: Over de keerzijde van sociale integratie. Apeldoorn/Leuven: Garant.Google Scholar

Grillo, R. 2003 “Cultural Essentialism and Cultural Anxiety,” Anthropological Theory 3(2): 157–173.Google Scholar

Grillo, R. 2005. “Backlash Against Diversity? Identity and Cultural Politics in European Cities,” Working Paper No. 14. Oxford: COMPAS.Google Scholar

Grillo, R. 2007. “An Excess of Alterity? Debating Difference in a Multicultural Society,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 979–998.Google Scholar

Guillaumin, C. 1995. Racism, Sexism, Power and Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gunsteren, H. R. van 1998. A Theory of Citizenship: Organizing Plurality in Contemporary Societies. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1989 “Leefwereld en systeem,” in De nieuwe onoverzichtelijkheid en andere opstellen. Amsterdam: Boom, pp. 148–167.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1996. Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hagelund, A. 2002. “Problematizing Culture: Discourses on Integration in Norway,” Journal of International Migration and Integration 3(3–4): 401–415.Google Scholar

Hagendoorn, L., Veenman, J., and Vollebergh, W. (eds.) 2003. Integrating Immigrants in the Netherlands. Cultural versus Socio-Economic Integration. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Hall, S. 1992. “Race, Culture, and Communications: Looking Backward and Forward at Cultural Studies,” Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society 5(1): 10–18.Google Scholar

Hall, S. 1996. “New Ethnicities,” in Baker, H. A., Diawara, M., and Lindeborg, R. H. (eds.). Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader, pp. 163–172. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hall, S. 2002. “Democracy, Globalization, and Difference,” in Enwezor, O. et al. (eds.): Democracy Unrealized: Documenta11_Platform1, pp. 21–35. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz.Google Scholar

Hammar, T. 1990. Democracy and the Nation-State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Hartigan, J. Jr. 2005. Odd Tribes: Toward a Cultural Analysis of White People. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Haut Conseil à l’Intégration 2009. Études et intégration: Faire connaître les valeurs de la République: Les élus issus de l’immigration dans les conseils municipaux (2001–2008). Rapport au Premier Ministre.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1970. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Heitmeyer, W. 1996. “Für türkische Jugendliche in Deutschland spielt der Islam eine wichtige Rolle,” Die Zeit 35, August 23.Google Scholar

Hindess, B. 2000. “Citizenship in the International Management of Populations,” American Behavioural Scientist 43(9): 486–97.Google Scholar

Hirsi Ali, A. 2002. “Integratie is een cultureel problem” [Integration Is a Cultural Problem], NRC Handelsblad, August 31, p. 7.Google Scholar

Hirsi Ali, A. 2006. The Caged Virgin: A Muslim Woman’s Cry for Reason. London: Free Press.Google Scholar

Hondius, D. 2011. “Access to the Netherlands of Enslaved and Free Black Africans: Exploring Legal and Social Historical Practices in the Sixteenth–Nineteenth Centuries,” Slavery & Abolition 32(3): 377–395.Google Scholar

Hooghiemstra, E. 2003. Trouwen over de grens: Achtergronden van partnerkeuze van Turken en Marokkanen in Nederland. The Hague: SCP.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. 1969. Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar

Houdt, F. van 2014. Governing Citizens: The Government of Citizenship, Crime and Migration in the Netherlands. Doctoral Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Houdt, F. van, Suvarierol, S., and Schinkel, W. 2011. “Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends towards ‘Earned Citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France, and the Netherlands,” International Sociology 26(3): 408–432.Google Scholar

Huis, I. van and de Regt, A. 2005. “Tussen dwang en dialoog: Maatschappijoriëntatie in inburgeringscursussen,” Sociologie 1(4): 382–406.Google Scholar

Huis, M. van 2007. “Partnertrends van allochtonen,” Bevolkingstrends, 4^e kwartaal 2007. CBS, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 2006. Phantasie und Bildbewußtsein. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Ignazi, P. 1992. “The Silent Counter-Revolution. Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-Wing Parties in Europe,” European Journal of Political Research 22: 3–34.Google Scholar

Israel, J. I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, D. 1996. Rights across Borders: Immigration and the Decline of Citizenship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Joppke, C. 2004. “The Retreat of Multiculturalism in the Liberal State: Theory and Policy,” British Journal of Sociology 55(2): 237–257.Google Scholar

Joppke, C. 2007. “Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe,” West European Politics 30(1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Joppke, C. 2009a. Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Joppke, C. 2009b. “Limits of Integration Policy: Britain and Her Muslims,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35(3): 453–472.Google Scholar

Kalmijn, M. and van Tubergen, F. 2006. “Ethnic Intermarriage in the Netherlands: Confirmations and Refutations of Accepted Insights,” European Journal of Population 22(4): 371–397.Google Scholar

Koomen, M. et al. 2013. “Discursive Framing and the Reproduction of Integration in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany,” Ethnicities 13(2): 191–208.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R. 2004. “Zachte heelmeesters … Een vergelijking van de resultaten van het Nederlandse en Duitse integratiebeleid en wat de WRR daaruit niet concludeert,” Migrantenstudies 18(2): 87–92.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. 2001. “How National Citizenship Shapes Transnationalism: A Comparative Analysis of Migrant Claims-Making in Germany, Great Britain and the Netherlands,” Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 17(2): 63–100.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R. et al. 2005. Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. 1959. Kritik und Krise: Eine Studie zur Pathogenese der bürgerlichen Welt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kruyt, A. and Niessen, J. 1997. “Integration,” in Vermeulen, H. (ed.). Immigrant Policy for a Multicultural Society: A Comparative Study of Integration, Language and Religious Policy in Five Western European Countries, pp. 15–55. Brussels: Migration Policy Group.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W. and Norman, W. 1994. “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,” Ethics 104(2): 352–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laan Bouma-Doff, W. van der 2004. “Begrensd contact: De relatie tussen ruimtelijke segregatie van allochtonen en de mate van contact,” Mens & Maatschappij 76(4): 348–366.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. 2000. “Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics,” in Butler, J., Laclau, E., and Žižek, S.. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, pp. 44–89. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Law, S. 2009. “Seeing like a Survey,” Cultural Sociology 3(2): 239–256.Google Scholar

Lechner, F. J. 2007a. “Redefining National Identity: Dutch Evidence on Global Patterns,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48(4): 355–368.Google Scholar

Lechner, F. J. 2007b. The Netherlands: Globalization and National Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leeuw, M. de and Van Wichelen, S. 2005. “‘Please, Go and Wake Up!’ Submission, Hirsi Ali and the ‘War on Terror’ in the Netherlands,” Feminist Media Studies 5(3): 325–340.Google Scholar

Lentin, A. and Titley, G. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1973a. Tristes Tropiques. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. 1973b. Structural Anthropology, Vol. 2. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lijphart, A. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lister, R. 1998. “Vocabularies of Citizenship and Gender: The UK,” Critical Social Policy 18(56): 309–331.Google Scholar

Lockwood, D. 1992. Solidarity and Schism: ‘The Problem of Disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology.” Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Löffler, B. 2011. Integration in Deutschland: Zwischen Assimilation und Multikulturalismus. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Lucassen, L. and Köbben, A. J. F. 1992. Het partiële gelijk: Controverses over het onderwijs in de eigen taal en cultuur en de rol daarbij van beleid en wetenschap (1951–1991). Amsterdam: Swetz & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1973. Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität: Über die Funktion von Zwecken in sozialen Systemen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1977. Funktion der Religion. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1982. “The Differentiation of Society,” in The Differentiation of Society, pp. 229–254. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1987. “Paradigmawechsel in der Systemtheorie: Ein Paradigma für Fortschritt?,” in Herzog, R. and Koselleck, R. (eds.). Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewußtsein. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1990. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1991. Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin: Walter deGruyter.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1993. Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1995. Die Kunst der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2000a. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2000b. The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2002. Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2004. Ökologische Kommunikation: Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen? Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2005a. Soziologische Aufklärung 1: Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2005b. Einführung in die Theorie der Gesellschaft. Heidelberg: Carl Auer.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 2006. Beobachtungen der Moderne. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Macionis, J. J. and Plummer, K. 2008. Sociology: A Global Introduction. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar

Maguire, M. W. 2006. The Conversion of Imagination: From Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Malcolm, X 1964. The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Marcson, S. 1950. “A Theory of Intermarriage and Assimilation,” Social Forces 29(1): 75–78.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. 1963. “Citizenship and Social Class,” in Lipset, M. S. (ed.). Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays by T. H. Marshall, pp. 71–134. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. Concord, MA: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Martinovic, B., Van Tubergen, F., and Maas, I. 2009. “Changes in Immigrants’ Social Integration during the Stay in the Host Country: The Case of Non-Western Immigrants in the Netherlands,” Social Science Research 38: 870–882.Google Scholar

Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1969 [1848]. Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar

Massad, J. A. 2007. Desiring Arabs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

M’Charek, A. 2013. “Beyond Fact or Fiction: On the Materiality of Race in Practice,” Cultural Anthropology 28(3): 420–442.Google Scholar

McConahay, J. B. 1986. “Modern Racism, Ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale,” in Dovidio, J. and Gaertner, S. (eds.). Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, pp. 91–125. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mead, M. et al. 1968. Science and the Concept of Race. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, L. (ed.) 1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Meeteren, M. van 2005. Discoursen van integratie: De omslag in het politieke debat over integratie in Nederland. Master’s thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Meeteren, M. van et al. 2008. “Zonder Papieren.” Over de positie van irreguliere migranten en de rol van het vreemdelingenbeleid in België. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar

Meier-Braun, K.-H. 2002. Deutschland, Einwanderungsland. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Merkel, A. 2010. “Sprache, Schlüssel zur Integration,” from www.bundeskanzlerin.de/nn_679950/Content/DE/Artikel/2010/12/2010-12-09-integrationsbesuche-hh. html (accessed 28-04-2011; link no longer active). For a summary, see: www.bundesregierung.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Artikel/2012/03/2012-03-08-bkin-bei-kmk.html (accessed September 7, 2015).Google Scholar

Merriam, C. E. 1931. The Making of Citizens. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Miles, R. 1993. Racism after “Race Relations.” London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Miller, P. and Rose, N. 2008. Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Mills, C. W. 1969. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists,” in Horowitz, I. L. (ed.). Power, Politics and People, pp. 525–552. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Modood, T. 1997. “Introduction: The Politics of Multiculturalism in the New Europe,” in Modood, T. and Werbner, P. (eds.), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Modood, T. 2007. Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Modood, T. and Werbner, P. (eds.) 1997. The Politics of Multiculturalism in the New Europe. Racism, Identity and Community. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Modood, T. et al. (eds.) 2006. Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Myrdal, G. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar

Nassehi, A. 2006. Der soziologische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Nederveen Pieterse, J. 2001. Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (2008): Gewoon homo zijn: Lesbisch- en homo-emancipatiebeleid 2008–2011. The Hague.Google Scholar

Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs 1994. Contourennota Integratiebeleid Etnische Minderheden. The Hague.Google Scholar

Netherlands Ministry of Interior Affairs 1994a. Beleidsopvolging Minderhedendebat: Advies in opdracht van de Minister van Binnenlandse Zaken. The Hague.Google Scholar

Netherlands Ministry of Interior Affairs 1994b. Contourennota Integratiebeleid Etnische Minderheden. The Hague.Google Scholar

Noordegraaf, M. 2008. “Meanings of Measurement: The Real Story behind the Rotterdam Safety Index,” Public Management Review 10(2): 219–237.Google Scholar

Obdeijn, H. and Schrover, M. 2008. Komen en gaan: Immigratie en emigratie in Nederland vanaf 1950. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

OECD and EU 2015. Indicators of Imnmigrant Integration 2015: Settling In. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Omi, M. A. 2001. “The Changing Meaning of Race,” in Smelser, N. J., Wilson, W. J., and Mitchell, F. (eds.). America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Ong, A. 1996. “Cultural Citizenship as Subject-Making: Immigrants Negotiate Racial and Cultural Boundaries in the United States,” Current Anthropology 37(5): 737–762.Google Scholar

Ossewaarde, R. 2006. Eigen verantwoordelijkheid: bevrijding of beheersing? Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, W. 2006. The Future of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Park, R. 1950 [1923]. “Our Racial Frontier on the Pacific,” in Highes, E. C. et al. (eds.). Race and Culture: The Collected Papers of Robert Ezra Park, Vol. 1, pp. 138–151. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Pascal, B. 1976. Pensées. Paris: Mercure de France.Google Scholar

Penninx, R. 1979. Naar een algemeen etnisch minderhedenbeleid? Voorstudie WRR. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar

Peters, B. 1993. Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Phalet, K. and Swyngedouw, M. 2003. “Measuring Immigrant Integration: The Case of Belgium,” Migration Studies 40(152): 773–803.Google Scholar

Phillips, A. 2007. Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Plato, 2003. The Republic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Poggi, G. 1965. “A Main Theme of Contemporary Sociological Analysis: Its Achievements and Limitations,” British Journal of Sociology 16(4): 283–294.Google Scholar

Policar, A. 1990. “Racism and Its Mirror Image,” Telos 83: 88–108.Google Scholar

Prak, M. 1997. “Burghers into Citizens: Urban and National Citizenship in the Netherlands during the Revolutionary Era (c. 1800),” Theory & Society 26(4): 403–420.Google Scholar

Pred, A. 2000. Even in Sweden: Racisms, Racialized Spaces, and the Popular Geographical Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Prins, B. 2000. Voorbij de onschuld: Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Putnam, R. D. et al. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Putten, N. van 2006. Terug naar de stad: Een kleine geschiedenis van het grotestedenbeleid (Back to the City: A Brief History of the Large Cities Policy). The Hague: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties, Directie Grotestedenbeleid en Interbestuurlijke Betrekkingen.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1961. Structure and Function in Primitive Societies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Reekum, R. van 2014. Out of Character: Debating Dutchness, Narrating Citizenship. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Reekum, R. van, Duyvendak, J. W., and Bertossi, C. 2012. “National Models of Integration and the Crisis of Multiculturalism: A Critical Comparative Perspective,” Patterns of Prejudice 46(5): 417–426.Google Scholar

Robertson, R. 1995. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity, in Featherstone, M., Lash, S., and Robertson, R. (eds.) Global Modernities, pp. 25–44. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Romeyn, E. 2014. “Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: Spectropolitics and Immigration,” Theory, Culture & Society 31(6): 77–101.Google Scholar

Roodenburg, H. , Euwals, R., and Rele, H. 2003. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants among Post-1965 Immigrant Youth,” Annals 530: 74–96.Google Scholar

Rose, N. 1994. “Medicine, History and the Present,” in Jones, C. and Porter, R. (eds.). Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body, pp. 48–72. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, N. et al. 2002. “Genetic Structure of Human Populations,” Science 298: 2381–2385.Google Scholar

Rotterdam City Council 2003. Rotterdam zet door: Op weg naar een stad in balans. Rotterdam: Gemeente Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Rotterdam City Council 2006. Rotterdamse Burgerschapscode (Rotterdam Citizenship Code). Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Runnymede Trust Commission 2000. The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain. London: Profile.Google Scholar

Ruthven, M. 2004. Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Said, E. W. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

San, M. van 1998. Stelen en steken: Delinquent gedrag van Curaçaose jongens in Nederland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Sand, J. 2003. House and Home in Modern Japan: Architecture, Domestic Space, and Bourgeois Culture, 1880–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar

Sand, S. 2011. Die Erfindung des Jüdischen Volkes: Israels Gründungsmythos auf dem Prüfstand. Berlin: List Verlag.Google Scholar

Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffer, P. 2000. “Het multiculturele drama,” NRC Handelsblad, January 29.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. 2007a. Denken in een tijd van sociale hypochondrie: Aanzet tot een theorie voorbij de maatschappij. Kampen: Klement.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. 2007b. “Sociological Discourse of the Relational: The Cases of Bourdieu & Latour,” Sociological Review 55(4): 707–729.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. (ed.) 2009. Globalization and the State: Sociological Perspectives on the State of the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. 2010. “From Zoèpolitics to Biopolitics: Citizenship and the Construction of Society,” European Journal of Social Theory 13(2): 155–172.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. 2012. De nieuwe democratie: Naar andere vormen van politiek. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. 2015. “Woorden zijn maar woorden,” De Groene Amsterdammer 139(4): 22–25.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. and van den Berg, M. A. 2011. “City of Exception: The Dutch Revanchist City and the Urban Homo Sacer,” Antipode 43(5): 1911–1938.Google Scholar

Schinkel, W. and Van Houdt, F. 2010. “The Double Helix of Cultural Assimilationism and Neoliberalism: Citizenship in Contemporary Governmentality,” British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 696–715.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2002. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Schnapper, D. 2003. La communauté des citoyens. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, J. W. 2009. “Sexularism: On Secularism and Gender Equality.” Ursula Hirschman Annual Lecture on Gender and Europe. Florence, Italy, April 23, 2009. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar

SCP 2003. Rapportage minderheden 2003. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2005. Jaarrapport Integratie 2005. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2006. Survey integratie minderheden 2006: Verantwoording van de opzet en de uitvoering van een survey onder Turken, Marokkanen, Surinamers, Antillianen en een autochtone vergelijkingsgroep. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2007a. Explaining Social Exclusion: A Theoretical Model Tested in the Netherlands. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2007b. Jaarrapport Integratie 2007. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2007c. Interventies voor integratie: Het tegengaan van etnische concentratie en het bevorderen van interetnisch contact. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

SCP 2009. Jaarrapport Integratie 2009. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Shafir, G. (ed.) 1998. The Citizenship Debates: A Reader. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Shalin, D. N. 2003. “George Herbert Mead,” in Ritzer, G. (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Major Classical Social Theorists. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Shapin, S. and Shaffer, S. 1989. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shorto, R. 2010. “The Integrationist,” New York Times Magazine, May 28.Google Scholar

Siebers, H. and Dennissen, M. J. J. 2015. “Is It Cultural Racism? Discursive Exclusion and Oppression of Migrants in the Netherlands,” Current Sociology 63(3): 470–489.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. 1995 [1903]. “Über räumliche Projektionen socialer Formen,” in Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, pp. 201–220. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Simon, P. 1999. “Nationality and Origins in French Statistics: Ambiguous Categories,” Population: An English Selection 11: 193–220.Google Scholar

Simon, P. 2003. “Les sciences socials françaises face aux catégories ethniques et raciales,” Annales de Démographie Historique 1: 111–130.Google Scholar

Sloterdijk, P. 1998. Der Starke Grund, zusammen zu sein: Erinnerungen an die Erfindung des Volkes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Small, S. and Solomos, J. 2006. “Race, Immigration and Politics in Britain: Changing Policy Agendas and Conceptual Paradigms, 1940s–2000s,” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47(3–4): 235–257.Google Scholar

Smedley, A. 1993. Race in North America: Origin and Evolution of a Worldview. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar

Smith, A. D. 1983. “Nationalism and Classical Social Theory,” British Journal of Sociology 34(1): 19–38.Google Scholar

Smith, V. 2007. Clean: A History of Personal Hygiene and Purity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Snel, E. and Engbersen, G. 1999. “Openheid en geslotenheid van de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat: Over oude en nieuwe vormen van sociale ongelijkheid,” in Trommel, W. and Van der Veen, R. (ed.). De Herverdeelde Samenleving: Ontwikkeling en herziening van de Nederlandse verzorgingsstaat, pp. 261–290. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M. and Hagendoorn, L. 2007. When Ways of Life Collide. Multiculturalism and Its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

SOEP 2008. Living in Germany: Survey 2008 on the Social Situation of Households. Munich: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung.Google Scholar

Solomos, J. and Back, L. 1996. Racism and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Somers, M. 2008. Genealogies of Citizenship. Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Soper, J. C. and Fetzer, J. S. 2007. “Religious Institutions, Church–State History and Muslim Mobilisation in Britain, France and Germany,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33(6): 933–944.Google Scholar

Soysal, Y. N. 1994. The Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Soysal, Y. N. 1997. “Changing Parameters of Citizenship and Claims-Making: Organized Islam in European Public Spheres,” Theory and Society 26: 509–527.Google Scholar

Staring, R. 1998. “Scenes from a Fake Marriage: Notes on the Flip-side of Embeddedness’ in Koser, K. and Lutz, H. (eds.). The New Migration in Europe: Social Constructions and Social Realities, pp. 224–241. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stevin, S. 2001 [1590]. Het burgherlick leven (Vita Politica). Utrecht: Bijleveld.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. 1995. “Two Conceptions of Citizenship,” British Journal of Sociology 46(1): 63–78.Google Scholar

Stocking, G. W. Jr. (ed.) 1974. A Franz Boas Reader: The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883–1911. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Stolcke, V. 1995. “Talking Culture: New Boundaries, New Rhetorics of Exclusion in Europe,” Current Anthropology 36(1): 1–24.Google Scholar

Stoler, A. L. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Stoler, A. L. 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tague, I. H. 2001. “Love, Honor, and Obedience: Fashionable Women and the Discourse of Marriage in the Early Eighteenth Century,” Journal of British Studies 40(1): 76–106.Google Scholar

Taguieff, P.-A. 1990. “The New Cultural Racism in France,” Telos 83: 109–122.Google Scholar

Taguieff, P.-A. 2010. Le Racisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Tarman, C. and Sears, D. O. 2005. “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Symbolic Racism,” Journal of Politics 67(3): 731–761.Google Scholar

Tawney, R. H. 1922. Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Gutmann, A. (ed.). Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, pp. 25–73. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

The Hague City Council 2006. Samen stad zijn: Burgers maken het verschil! Beleidskader Burgerschap. (The Hague Policy Memorandum on Citizenship Being the City Together: Citizens Make the Difference). The Hague.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. 2011. Travel Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thucydides 1954. The Peloponnesian War. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Tillich, P. 1959. Theology of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tillich, P. 1961. Wesen und Wandel des Glaubens. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar

Tilly, C. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Tokmetzis, D. 2007. “Echte problemen zitten achter de voordeur: Verloedering in de Utrechtse wijk Overvecht moet door bewoners zelf worden bestreden,” NRC Handelsblad, January 6–7, p. 3.Google Scholar

Torpey, J. 1998. “Coming and Going: On the State Monopolization of the Legitimate ‘Means of Movement’,” Sociological Theory 16(3): 239–259.Google Scholar

Touraine, A. 2003. “The Decline of the Social,” Comparative Sociology 2(3): 463–474.Google Scholar

Touraine, A. 2007. “Sociology after Sociology,” European Journal of Social Theory 10(2): 184–193.Google Scholar

Towns, A. 2002. “Paradoxes of (In)Equality: Something Is Rotten in the Gender Equal State of Sweden,” Cooperation and Conflict 37(2): 157–179.Google Scholar

Tresch, J. 2012. The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tribalat, M. et al. 1996. De l’immigration à l’assimilation: Enquête sur les populations d’origine étrangère en France. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Tubergen, F. van 2004. The Integration of Immigrants in Cross-National Perspective: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects. Utrecht: ICS.Google Scholar

Tubergen, F. van and Maas, I. 2007. “Ethnic Intermarriage among Immigrants in the Netherlands: An Analysis of Population Data,” Social Science Research 36(3): 1065–1086.Google Scholar

Turner, B. 2001. “The Erosion of Citizenship,” British Journal of Sociology 52(2): 189–209.Google Scholar

Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal 2005. Jaarnota Integratiebeleid 2005. Tweede Kamer, 30 304Google Scholar

Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal 2006. Jaarnota Integratiebeleid 2006. Tweede Kamer, 30 810.Google Scholar

Uitermark, J. 2010. Dynamics of Power in Dutch Integration Politics. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Uitermark, J. et al. 2005. “Reinventing Multiculturalism: Urban Citizenship and the Negotiation of Ethnic Diversity in Amsterdam,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29(3): 622–640.Google Scholar

Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Veenman, J. 1995. Onbekend maakt onbemind: Over de selectie van allochtonen op de arbeidsmarkt. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Veer, P. van der 2006. “Pim Fortuyn, Theo van Gogh, and the Politics of Tolerance in the Netherlands,” Public Culture 18(1): 111–124.Google Scholar

Verbrugge, A. 2004. Tijd van onbehagen: Filosofische essays over een cultuur op drift. Amsterdam: SUN.Google Scholar

Verhofstadt, D. 2006. De derde feministische golf (‘The Third Feminist Wave’). Antwerp: Houtekiet.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, B. P. 2007. Vrijheid, gelijkheid, burgerschap: Over verschuivende fundamenten van het Nederlandse minderhedenrecht en –beleid: immigratie, integratie, onderwijs en religie. The Hague: SDU Uitgevers.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, H. and Penninx, R. (eds.) 2000. Immigrant Integration: The Dutch Case. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar

Verwey-Jonker Institute 2003. Bronnenonderzoek Integratiebeleid. The Hague: SDU.Google Scholar

Voegelin, E. 1998. The History of the Race Idea: From Ray to Carus. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

VROM 2007. Integratienota 2007–2011: Zorg dat je erbij hoort! The Hague: Ministerie van VROM/WWI.Google Scholar

VVD 1994. Beleidsnotitie van niet-westerse migranten in Nederland [Policy-paper on non-western immigrants in the Netherlands].Google Scholar

Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Ward, L. 1921. “Sociology and the Social Sciences: The Social Organism and the Collective Mind,” American Journal of Sociology 27(1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Weber, E. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1880–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Weijters, G. and Scheepers, P. 2003. “Verschillen in sociale integratie tussen etnische groepen: beschrijving en verklaring,” Mens & Maatschappij 78(2): 144–157.Google Scholar

Weingart, P. 2000. “Biologie als Gesellschaftstheorie,” in Barsch, A. and Hejl, P. M. (eds.). Menschenbilder: Zur Pluralisierung der Vorstellung von der menschlichen Natur (1850–1914), pp. 146–166. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Wekker, G. 2016. White Innocence: Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

White, H. C. 2007. “Instituting Society, Our Mirage,” European Journal of Social Theory 10(2): 194–199.Google Scholar

White, H. C. 2008. Identity & Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wieviorka, M. 2005. La différence: Identités culturelles: enjeux, débats et politiques. Paris: Éditions de l’aube.Google Scholar

Wikan, U. 1995. Mot en ny norsk underklasse: Innvandrere, kultur og integrasjon (‘Towards a New Norwegian Underclass. Immigrants, Culture and Integration’). Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Wikan, U. 1999. “Culture: A New Concept of Race,” Social Anthropology 7(1): 57–64.Google Scholar

Wikan, U. 2002. Generous Betrayal: Politics of Culture in the New Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Williams, R. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar

Williams, V. J. Jr. 2006. The Social Sciences and Theories of Race. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Willke, H. 1993. Systemtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar

Wilson, W. J. 1980. The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences,” Global Networks 2(4): 301–334.Google Scholar

Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. 2003. “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology,” International Migration Review 37(3): 576–610.Google Scholar

Winant, H. 2004. The New Politics of Race: Globalism, Difference, Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Wirth, L. 1938. The Ghetto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1984. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Wolin, S. 2004. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wright Mills, C. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wright Mills, C. 1969. “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists,” in Horowitz, I. L. (ed.). Power, Politics and People, pp. 525–552. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

WRR 1979. Etnische minderheden: Rapport aan de regering. The Hague: Staatsuitgeverij.Google Scholar

WRR [Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy] 2001. Nederland als immigratiesamenleving. The Hague: SDU.Google Scholar

Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Yuval-Davis, N. 1999. “The ‘Multi-Layered Citizen.’ Citizenship in the Age of Glocalization,” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1(1): 119–136.Google Scholar

Žižek, S. 2000. The Fragile Absolute or, Why Is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? London: Verso.Google Scholar

Žižek, S. 2008. “Tolerance as an Ideological Category,” Critical Inquiry 34: 660–682.Google Scholar

Zolberg, A. and Woon, 1998. “Why ‘Islam’ Is like ‘Spanish,’” Politics and Society 27(1): 5–38.Google Scholar

Zwaard, J. van der 2008. Gelukzoekers: Vrouwelijke huwelijksmigranten in Nederland. Amsterdam: Artemis & Co.Google Scholar