Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:30:42.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2016

David Livingstone Smith
Affiliation:
University of New England, Maine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How Biology Shapes Philosophy
New Foundations for Naturalism
, pp. 302 - 341
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Allen, C., and Bekoff, M. 1995. “Function, Natural Design, and Animal Behavior: Philosophical and Ethological Considerations,” in Thompson, (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 146.Google Scholar
Almeder, R. 1998. Harmless Naturalism: The Limits of Science and the Nature of Philosophy. New York: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. 1979. “Some Typical Problems in Biophilosophy,” Journal of Social and Biological Structures 2:155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, P., and Simpson, Z. 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Carlo, M., and Macarthur, D. 2004. Naturalism in Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2006. “Higher-Order Truths About Chmess,” Topoi 25:3941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, O. 2006. “Varieties of Naturalism,” in Clayton, and Simpson, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 430–52.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. 2009. From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality, Species, and Evolution. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2014. Philosophy of Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. 2014. “Philosophy of Biology,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/biology-philosophy/.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1992a. Freud’s Dream: A Complete Interdisciplinary Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1992b. “The Naturalists Return,” Philosophical Review 101:53114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutrofinis, S. A. (ed.). 2014. Life and Process: Toward a New Biophilosophy. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahner, M., and Bunge, M. 1979. Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. 2012. Dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. 1996. “A Field Guide to Recent Species of Naturalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47:129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, F. 1992. Freud: Biologist of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. S. 1995. Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. XI: Behavioral Design. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Dawkins, R., 2014. “Essences,” Edge.org (Answer to Edge.org annual question: What scientific idea is ready for retirement?).Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1971. “Intentional Systems,” Journal of Philosophy 68:87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2009. “Darwin’s ‘Strange Inversion of Reasoning,’Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 106(Suppl. 1):10061–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. and Plantinga, A. 2011. Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 2008. “Against Darwinism,” Mind and Language 23:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, J., and Radick, G. (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, D., and Sander, E. 2013. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2009. “Giving Darwin His Due,” in Hodge, and Radick, (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99420.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, R. B. 1868. The Darwinian Theory of the Transmutation of Species Examined. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Magnan, A. 1934. Les Vols des Insects. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
McMasters, J. 1989. “The Flight of the Bumblebee and Related Myths of Entomological Engineering,” American Scientist 77:164–8.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffman, D. 2005. “Borderline Cases and Bivalence,” Philosophical Review 114:131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffman, D. 2014. Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, D. 1975. “Infinity and Vagueness,” Philosophical Review 84:520–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, G. 2010. “Your Move: The Maze of Free Will,” The Stone, New York Times online, July 22, 2010. Available at: www.scrfibd.com/doc/86763712/Week-2-Strawson-The-Maze-of-Free-Will.Google Scholar
Bashour, B., and Muller, H. 2013. Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. 1976. Linguistic Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1969. Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1975. “Why the Law of Effect Will Not Go Away,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 5:169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2013. “The Evolution of Reasons,” in Bashour, and Muller, (eds.), Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications. London: Routledge, pp. 1347.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1989. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1990. The Theory of Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, B., and Sterelny, K. 2013. “Evolution and Moral Realism.” Available at: www.sas.upenn.edu/~weisberg/PBDB/PBDB7_files/Sterelny-Fraser.Evolution%20and%20%20Moral%20Realism.V7b.pdf.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1957. “Meaning,” Philosophical Review 66:377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, J., Ryde, D., and Williford, K. 2012. Millikan and Her Critics. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1714. Mondadology, Bennett, J., trans. Available at: www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibmona.pdf.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Catagories. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 2012. “Toward an Informational Teleosemantics,” in Kingsbury, , Ryde, , and Williford, (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. New York: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. 2014. “How Physics Fakes Design,” in Thompson, and Walsh, (eds.), Evolutionary Biology: Conceptual, Ethical, and Religious Issues. Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–38.Google Scholar
Ruskin, J. 2011. The Modern Painters, 1856. New York: National Library Association Facsimile.Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1980. “Minds, Brains and Programs,” Brain and Behavioral Science 3:417–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, B. 1677. Ethics, Bennett, J., trans. Available at: www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/spinoza1665.pdf.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1964. Explanation of Behavior. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., and Walsh, D. 2014. Evolutionary Biology: Conceptual, Ethical, and Religious Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. 2004. “Animal Pain,” Noûs 38:617–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, B. 1988. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, M., Wolanin, P., and Stock, J. 2006. “Signal Transduction in Bacterial Chemotaxis,” BioEssays 28:922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogdan, R. 1986. Belief: Form, Content and Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brook, A., and Akins, K. 2005. Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, G., and Jensen, S. 2015. “The Origin of the Animals and a ‘Savannah’ Hypothesis for Early Bilaterian Evolution,” Biological Reviews doi: 10.1111/brv.12239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2015. The Centered Mind: What the Science of Working Memory Shows Us About the Nature of Human Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Danbury, T., Weeks, C., Waterman-Pearson, A., et al. 2000. “Self-Selection of the Analgesic Drug Carprofen by Lame Broiler Chickens,” Veterinary Record 146:307–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darmaillacq, A.-S., Dickel, L., and Mather, J. 2014. Cephalopod Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, D. 2014. Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Denton, D., McKinley, M. J., Farrell, M., and Egan, G. F. 2009. “The Role of Primordial Emotions in the Evolutionary Origin of Consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition 18:500–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dretske, F. 1986. “Misrepresentation,” in Bogdan, (ed.), Belief: Form, Content and Function. Oxford: Oxford University, pp. 1736.Google Scholar
Eisemann, C. H., Jorgensen, K., Merritt, D. J., et al. 1984. “Do Insects Feel Pain? A Biological View,” Experientia 40:164–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwood, R. 2012. “Evidence for Pain in Decapod Crustaceans,” Animal Welfare 21:23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. Forthcoming. “Mind, Matter, and Metabolism,” Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Jékely, G. 2009. “Evolution of Phototaxis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 364:2795–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jékely, G., Paps, J., and Nielsen, C. 2015. “The Phylogenetic Position of Ctenophores and the Origin(s) of Nervous Systems.” EvoDevo 6. Available at: www.evodevojournal.com/content/6/1/1.Google ScholarPubMed
Jékely, G., Keijzer, F., and Godfrey-Smith, P. 2015. “An Option Space for Early Neural Evolution,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 370. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R. 2013. “Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare,” Biology and Philosophy 28:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, F., van Duijn, M., and Lyon, P. 2013. “What Nervous Systems Do: Early Evolution, Input-Output, and the Skin-Brain Thesis,” Adaptive Behavior 21:6785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, B. 2015. “Fish Do Not Feel Pain and Its Implications for Understanding Phenomenal Consciousness,” Biology and Philosophy 30:149–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lüttge, U., and Beyschlag, W. 2013. Progress in Botany LXXVII. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. 2006. “Explaining the Cambrian ‘Explosion’ of Animals,” Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 34:355–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMenamin, M. 1998. The Garden of Ediacara. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, D., and Goodale, M. 2005. Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moroz, L. 2015. “Convergent Evolution of Neural Systems in Ctenophores,” Journal of Experimental Biology 218:598611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?Philosophical Review 83:435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, C. 2008. “Six Major Steps in Animal Evolution: Are We Derived Sponge Larvae?Evolution and Development 10:241–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Malley, M. 2014. Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. 1956. “The Origin of the Nervous System,” Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 28:171–81.Google Scholar
Parker, A. 2003. In the Blink of an Eye: How Vision Sparked the Big Bang of Evolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pery, C., Barron, A., and Cheng, K. 2013. “Invertebrate Learning and Cognition: Relating Phenomena to Neural Substrate,” WIREs Cognitive Science 4:561–82.Google Scholar
Peterson, K., Cotton, J., Gehling, J., and Pisani, D. 2008. “The Ediacaran Emergence of Bilaterians: Congruence Between the Genetic and the Geological Fossil Records,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 363:1435–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, J. 2000. “A Neurofunctional Theory of Consciousness,” in Brook, and Akins, (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–96.Google Scholar
Sneddon, L. 2011. “Pain Perception in Fish: Evidence and Implications for the Use of Fish,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 18:209–29.Google Scholar
Spang, A., Saw, J., Jørgensen, S., et al. 2015. “Complex Archaea That Bridge the Gap Between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes,” Nature 521:173–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trestman, M. 2013. “The Cambrian Explosion and the Origins of Embodied Cognition,” Biological Theory 8:8092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkov, A., and Markin, V. 2014. “Active and Passive Electrical Signaling in Plants,” in Lüttge, and Beyschlag, (eds.), Progress in Botany LXXVII. New York: Springer, pp. 143–76.Google Scholar
Allman, J. 1999. Evolving Brains. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Arstila, V., and Lloyd, D. 2014. Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Temporality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, B. J., and Gage, N. M. 2007. Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickle, J. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brozek, B. 2013. Rule Following. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. 1996The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1996a. The Engine of Reason, The Seat of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 1996b. “The Rediscovery of Light,” Journal of Philosophy 93:211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 2007. Philosophy at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. 2013. Plato’s Camera. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Towards a Unified Understanding of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2002. Brain-Wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2013a. Touching a Nerve. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2013b. “Exploring the Causal Underpinning of Determination, Resolve, and Will,” Neuron 80:1337–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. J. 1992. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. 2009. Explaining the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Danks, D. 2014. Unifying the Mind: Cognitive Representations as Graphical Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eliasmith, C. 2013. How to Build a Brain: A Neural Architecture for Biological Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1980. “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:63109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 2000. The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1998. In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frith, C. 2007. Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. 2015. Tales from Both Sides of the Brain: A Life in Neuroscience. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M., and LeDoux, J. 1978. The Integrated Mind. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimcher, P., and Fehr, E. 2013. Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain, 2nd edn. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. 2001. The Minds Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, M. 2013. Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grens, K. 2014. “The Rainbow Connection,” The Scientist. Available at: www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/41055/title/The-Rainbow-Connection/.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M., Brozek, B., and Kurek, L. 2013. Between Philosophy and Science. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. 2013. “Where Do Features Come From?Cognitive Science 38:1078–111.Google ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, P. 2013. The Unpredictable Species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. 2014. “Storm over the Brain: Review of Patricia S. Churchland, Touching a Nerve,” New York Review of Books, April 24.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. 2012. “All Machine and No Ghost,” New Statesman, February, 141, p. 40.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. 1979. Advice to a Young Scientist. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mele, A. 2014. Surrounding Free Will: Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, E. I., Roudi, Y., Witter, M. P., et al. 2014. “Grid Cells and Cortical Representation,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15:466–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanay, B. 2010. “A Modal Theory of Function,” Journal of Philosophy 107:412–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pääbo, S. 2014. Neanderthal Man: In Search of the Lost Genomes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pace-Schott, E. F., and Hobson, J. A. 2002. “The Neurobiology of Sleep: Genetics, Cellular Physiology and Subcortical Networks,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3:591600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parvizi, J., Rangarajan, V., Shirer, W. R., Desai, N., and Greicius, M. D. 2013. “The Will to Persevere Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Human Cingulate Gyrus,” Neuron 80:1359–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, S. E., and Posner, M. I. 2012. “The Attention System of the Human Brain: 20 Years After,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 35:7389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ryvlin, R., Cross, J. H., and Rheims, S. 2014. “Epilepsy Surgery in Children and Adults,” Lancet Neurology 13:1114–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J., Nadelhoffer, T., Nahmias, E., and Vohs, K. 2014. “Measuring and Manipulating Beliefs About Free Will and Related Concepts: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly,” in Mele, (ed.), Surrounding Free Will: Philosophy, Psychology, Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, R. 2014. The Soul of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C., and Weaver, W. 1998. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Silva, A. J., Landreth, A., and Bickle, J. 2014. Engineering the Next Revolution in Neuroscience: The New Science of Experiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. L. 2011. Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, S. G., and Lennie, P. 2007. “The Machinery of Colour Vision,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:276–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E., and Clark, R. E. 2004. “The Medial Temporal Lobe,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 27:279306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E., Clark, R. E., Berg, D., Bloom, F. E., et al. 2012. Fundamental Neuroscience, 4th edn. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Striedter, G. F., Belgard, T. G., Chen, C. C., et al. 2014. “NSF Workshop Report: Discovering General Principles of Nervous System Organization by Comparing Brain Maps Across Species,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution 83:18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thagard, P. 2014. “Explanatory Identities and Conceptual Change,” Science and Education 23:1531–48.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 2015. To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Gao, B., Fang, Z., et al. 2013. “Stochastic Learning in Oxide Binary Synaptic Devices for Neuromorphic Computing,” Frontiers in Neuroscience 7:19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, M. 2005. “Teleosemantics Without Natural Selection,” Biology and Philosophy 20:97116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, J., and Pargetter, R. 1987. “Functions,” Journal of Philosophy 84:181–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdan, R. 1986. Belief: Form, Content and Function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 1976. “Wright on Functions,” Philosophical Review 85:7086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. 1975. “Functional Analysis,” Journal of Philosophy 72:741–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1987. “Knowing One’s Own Mind,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60:441–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1986. “Misrepresentation” in Bogdan, (ed.), Belief: Form, Content and Function. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1736.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1984. “Semantics, Wisconsin Style,” Synthese 59:231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1990. A Theory of Content. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. 1999. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kriegel, U. 2013. Phenomenal Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1969. Convention. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mameli, M. 2004. “Nongenetic Selection and Nongenetic Inheritance,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55:3571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions,” Philosophy of Science 56:288302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1991. “Speaking Up for Darwin,” in Rey, and Loewer, (eds.), Meaning and Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 151–64.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1996. “On Swampkinds,” Mind and Language 11:103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A., and Goodale, M. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nanay, B. 2014. “Teleosemantics Without Etiology,” Philosophy of Science 81:798810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function,’Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:454–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1995. “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning,” Philosophical Studies 79:109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1996. “Swampman Meets Swampcow,” Mind and Language 11:118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 1984. “Representation and Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 51:550–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 1987. Reality and Representation. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 1996. “Doubtful Intuitions,” Mind and Language 11:130–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 2001. “The Status of Teleosemantics, or How to Stop Worrying About Swampman,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79:7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 2003. “Is Representation Rife?Ratio 16:107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 2014. “Sensory Experience and Representational Properties,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114:133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 2016. “Against Representationalism (about Conscious Sensory Experience),” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24:324–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrowski, P. 1992. “Intentionality and Teleological Error,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73:267–82.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. 1927. “Facts and Propositions,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 7:153206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, G., and Loewer, B. 1991. Meaning and Mind: Fodor and His Critics Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R., Cheney, D., and Marler, P. 1980. “Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls: Evidence of Predator Classification and Semantic Communication,” Science 210:801–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skyrms, B. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. 1973. “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82:139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriaans, P., and van Benthem, J. 2008. Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ariew, A., Cummins, R. and Perlman, M. 2002. Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdan, R. 1986. Belief: Form, Content and Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 1977. “Health as a Theoretical Concept,” Philosophy of Science 44: 542–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 2002. “A Rebuttal on Functions,” in Ariew, A., Cummins, R. and Perlman, M. (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 1997. “A Rebuttal on Health,” in Humber, and Almeder, (eds.), What Is Disease? Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 3143.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. 2013. “A General Case for Function Pluralism,” in Huneman, (ed.), Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, New York: Springer, pp. 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A. 1986. “On Drawing Inferences About the Structure of Normal Cognitive Systems from the Analysis of Patterns of Impaired Performance: The Case for Single-Patient Studies,” Brain and Cognition 5:4166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A. 1992. “Is Cognitive Neuroscience Possible?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4:8095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A. and Coltheart, M. 2006. “Cognitive Neuropsychology Twenty Years On,” Cognitive Neuropsychology 23:312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M. 2004. “Brain Imaging, Connectionism and Cognitive Neuropsychology,” Cognitive Neuropsychology 21:21–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craver, C. 2001. “Role Functions, Mechanisms, and Hierarchy,” Philosophy of Science 68:5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, M., and Pfeifer, J. 2016. Kitcher and His Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. 1975. “Functional Analysis,” Journal of Philosophy 72:741–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. S. 2001. Norms of Nature: Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, S., Rodionov, R. N., Arning, E., et al. 2008. “Tissue-Specific Downregulation of Dimethylarginine Dimethylaminohydrolase in Hyperhomocysteinemia,” American Journal of Physiology – Heart and Circulatory Physiology 295:H81625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dretske, F. 1986. “Misrepresentation,” in Bogdan, (ed.), Belief: Form, Content and Function, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1736.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 2008. “Epistemology and Information,” in Adriaans, and van Benthem, (eds.), Philosophy of Information, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figdor, C. 2010. “Neuroscience and the Multiple Realization of Cognitive Functions,” Philosophy of Science 77:419–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2013. “The Functional Sense of Mechanism,” Philosophy of Science 80:317–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1993. “Functions: Consensus Without Unity,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74:196208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humber, J. M., and Almeder, R. F. 1997. What Is Disease? Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneman, P. 2013. Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneman, P.Introduction,” in Huneman, (ed.), Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. New York: Springer, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Jacob, P. 1997. What Minds Can Do: Intentionality in a Non-Intentional World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1993. “Function and Design,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18:379–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, M. 2009. Visual Reflections: A Perceptual Deficit and Its Implications. Oxford: Oxford Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGeer, V. 2007. “Why Neuroscience Matters to Cognitive Neuropsychology,” Synthese 159:347–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1989An Ambiguity in the Notion ‘Function,’Biology and Philosophy 4:172–6.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 2002. “Biofunctions: Two Paradigms,” in Ariew, , Cummins, , and Perlman, (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–43.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 1991a. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense,” Philosophy of Science 58:168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1991b. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:454–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1995. “Misrepresenting and Malfunctioning,” Philosophical Studies 79:109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 2012. “Biological Function,” in Routledge Encylopedia of Philosophy. Available at: www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biological-function.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 2013. “Toward an Informational Teleosemantics,” in Ryder, D., Kingsbury, J., and Williford, K. (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 2140.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 2015. “Functional Analysis and the Species Design,” Synthese doi: 10.1007/s 11229-015-0940-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 2016. “Kitcher’s Two Design Stances,” in Couch, and Pfeifer, (eds.), Kitcher and His Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4573.Google Scholar
Neander, K. and Rosenberg, A. 2012. “Solving the Circularity Problem for Functions: A Response to Nanay,” Journal of Philosophy 109:613–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C. G., Zeki, S., and Barlow, H. B. 2012. “Localization of Function in the Cerebral Cortex: Past, Present and Future,” Brain 107:328–61.Google Scholar
Ryder, D., Kingsbury, J., and Williford, K. 2013. Millikan and Her Critics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scarantino, A. 2013Animal Communication as Information-Mediated Influence,” in Stegman, (ed.), Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. 2007. “Consumers Need Information: Supplementing Teleosemantics with an Input Condition,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75:404–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulte, P. 2012. “How Frogs See the World: Putting Millikan’s Teleosemantics to the Test,” Philosophia 40:483–96.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R., and Kandel, E. R. 2003. Memory: From Mind to Molecules. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stampe, D. 1977. “Toward a Causal Theory of Linguistic Representation,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2:4263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegman, U. 2013. Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. 1973. “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82:139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C., Bekoff, M., and Lauder, G. 1998. Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984a. The Complete Works: The Revised Oxford Translation, Barnes, J. (ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984b. “Nicomachean Ethics,” in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 17291867.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. R., and Bellis, M. A. 1995. Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation and Infidelity. London: Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
Barash, D. P., and Lipton, J. E. 2001. The Myth of Monogamy: Fidelity and Infidelity in Animals and People. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Benatar, D. 2006. Better Never to Have Been. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 1992. “Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (or Anything Else) in Sizable Groups,” Ethology and Sociobiology 13:166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 2005. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007. “Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology,” in Broadie, S. (ed.), Aristotle and Beyond: Essays in Metaphysics and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, G., Doğuoğlu, U., and Kuenzle, D. 2008. Epistemology and Emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Burton, F. D. 1971. “Sexual Climax in the Female Macaca Mulatta,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Primatology 3:181–91.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1994. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2012. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. 2012. “Plant Individuality: A Solution to the Demographer’s Dilemma.” Biology and Philosophy 27:321–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S. 2003. Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R. 1998. How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sousa, R. 2005. “Biological Individuality,” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 54:195218.Google Scholar
de Sousa, R. 2008. “Epistemic Feelings,” in Brun, , Doğuoğlu, , and Kuenzle, (eds.), Epistemology and Emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 185204.Google Scholar
Deonna, J. A., and Teroni, F. 2011. In Defense of Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D., and Hardy, J. W. 2009. The Ethical Slut: A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships and Other Adventures, 2nd edn. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.Google Scholar
Fine, C. 2011. Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. 1998. “Lust, Attraction and Attachment in Mammalian Reproduction,” Human Nature 9:2352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, H. 2004. Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Forber, P., and Smead, R. 2014. “The Evolution of Fairness Through Spite,” Proceedings of Biological Science doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, E. M. 1951. “What I Believe,” in Two Cheers for Democracy. New York: Harcourt Brace, pp. 6576.Google Scholar
Gide, A. 1942. Les Nourritures Terrestres. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., and Bjorklund, F. 2008. “Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Moral Psychology,” in Sinnot-Armstrong, (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 181217.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. 2004. “The Evolution of Jealousy,” American Scientist 92:6271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, S. 2011. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1975. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding; A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 1998. “Normative Virtue Ethics,” in Crisp, (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H., and Huxley, J. 1947. Evolution and Ethics, 1893–1943. London: Pilot Press.Google Scholar
Kauppinen, A. 2014. “Moral Sentimentalism,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/moral-sentimentalism/.Google Scholar
Kreisberg, J. C. 1995. “A Globe, Clothing Itself with a Brain.” Wired, June.Google Scholar
Langton, C. G., 1992. “Life on the Edge of Chaos,” in Langton, , Taylor, , Farmer, , and Rasmussen, (eds.), Artificial Life II. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 4192.Google Scholar
Langton, C. G., Taylor, C., Farmer, J. D., and Rasmussen, S. 1992. Artificial Life II. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. 2005. The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1984. “Game Theory and the Evolution of Behavior,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:95126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. 1999. The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1874. Nature, the Utility of Religion, Theism, Being Three Essays on Religion. London: Longman, Green, Reader, and Dyer.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1991. Utilitarianism: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 2005. “March of the Conservatives: Penguin Film as Political Fodder,” New York Times. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2005/09/13/science/13peng.html?pagewanted=print.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1967. On the Genealogy of Morality, Clark, M. and Swensen, A. J., trans. and notes. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., and Wilson, E. O. 2010. “Inclusive Fitness Theory and Eusociality,” Nature 466:1057–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, R. 1994. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1977. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 2000. Mendel’s Demon: Gene Justice and the Complexity of Life. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Ryan, C., and Jethá, C. 2010. Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sade, D. A.. 1810. La Philosophie dans le Boudoir (facsimile). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B. 1986 [1908]. “Getting Married: A Disquisitory Play with Preface,” in Laurence, D. H. (ed.), Getting Married and Press Cuttings by Bernard Shaw: Definitive Text. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sinnot-Armstrong, W. 2008. Moral Psychology, Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E., and Wilson, D. S. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tavris, C. 1992. The Mismeasure of Woman. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Teilhard de Chardin, P. 1961. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Tennov, D. 1979. Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. 1995. Issues in Evolutionary Ethics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. 2002. “The Evolutionary Biology of Evil,” Monist 85:239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R., and Pickett, K. 2010. The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 2015. Does Altruism Exist? Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, E. N., and Mathieu, C. 2007. Leaving Mother Lake: A Girlhood at the Edge of the World. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Andrews, K. 2014. “Animal Cognition,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/cognition-animal/.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: the Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisin, A., and Jackson, M. 2011. Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Charlseworth, B. 1994. Evolution in Age: Structured Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chater, N. 2012. “Building Blocks of Human Decision Making,” in Hammerstein, and Stevens, (eds.), Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N., Emery, N., and Dickinson, A. 2006. “The Rationality of Animal Memory,” in Nudds, and Hurley, (eds.), Animal Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197216.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1994. “Better Than Rational: Evolutionary Psychology and the Invisible Hand,” American Economic Review 84:327–32.Google Scholar
Curry, P. 2001. “Decision Making Under Uncertainty and the Evolution of Interdependent Preferences,” Journal of Economic Theory 98:5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielson, P. Modelling Rationality, Morality and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Danielson, P. 2004. “Rationality and Evolution,” in Rawling, and Mele, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 417–37.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, A., and Grafen, A. 2009. “Capturing the Superorganism: A Formal Theory of Group Adaptation,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 22:659–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G. 2010. Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. 2001. Bounded Rationality: the Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. 2009. The Bounds of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafen, A. 1999. “Formal Darwinism, the Individual-as-Maximizing-Agent Analogy, and Bet-Hedging,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 266:799803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafen, A. 2006a. “Optimization of Inclusive Fitness,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 238:541–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. 2006b. “A Theory of Fisher’s Reproductive Value,” Journal of Mathematical Biology 53:1560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. 2007. “The Formal Darwinism Project: A Mid-Term Report,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, D. 2012. “The Strategic Gene,” Biology and Philosophy 27:461–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior I and II,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstein, P., and Stevens, J. 2014a. “Six Reasons for Invoking Evolution in Decision Theory,” in Hammerstein, and Stevens, (eds.), Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Hammerstein, P., and Stevens, J. 2014b. Evolution and the Mechanisms of Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Houston, A., and McNamara, J. 1999. Models of Adaptive Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, A., McNamara, J., and Steer, M. 2007. “Do We Expect Natural Selection to Produce Rational Behavior?Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362:1531–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacelnik, A. 2006. “Meanings of Rationality,” in Nudds, and Hurley, (eds.), Animal Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87106.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 2000. Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1981. “Causal Decision Theory,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59:530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, J. Forthcoming. “Hamilton Meets Causal Decision Theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1974. “The Theory of Games and the Evolution of Animal Conflicts,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 47:209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mylius, S., and Diekmann, O. 1995. “On Evolutionarily Stable Life Histories, Optimization and the Need to Be Specific About Density Dependence,” Oikos 74:218–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nudds, M., and Hurley, S. 2006. Animal Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. 2011. “Optimal Choice in the Face of Risk: Decision Theory Meets Evolution,” Philosophy of Science 78:83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S. and Binmore, K. 2014. Evolution and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orr, A. 2007. “Absolute Fitness, Relative Fitness, and Utility,” Evolution 61:29973000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. 1931. “Truth and Probability,” in Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.), Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. New York: Harcourt, pp. 156198.Google Scholar
Rawling, P., and Mele, A. 2004. The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rayo, L., and Robson, A. 2013. “Biology and the Arguments of Utility,” Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2254895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, A. 1996. “A Biological Basis for Expected and Non-expected Utility,” Journal of Economic Theory 68:397424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, A. and Samuelson, L. 2011. “The Evolutionary Foundations of Preferences,” in Bisin, and Jackson, (eds.), Handbook of Social Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 221310.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L., and Swinkels, J. 2006. “Information, Evolution and Utility,” Theoretical Economics 1:119–42.Google Scholar
Savage, L. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Seeley, T. 1996. The Wisdom of the Hive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Seeley, T. 2010. Honey-Bee Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1998. “Three Differences Between Evolution and Deliberation,” in Danielson, (ed.), Modelling Rationality, Morality and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 408–22.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. 2000. “Daniel Bernoulli (1738): Evolution and Economics Under Risk,” Journal of Biosciences 25:221–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, C. 2001. “When Is It Selectively Advantageous to Have True Beliefs?Philosophical Studies 105:161–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought In a Hostile World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012. “From Fitness to Utility,” in Okasha, and Binmore, (eds.), Evolution and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–73.Google Scholar
Todd, P., Gigerenzer, G., and the ABC Research Group. 2012. Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibull, J. 1995. Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, C. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehm, C. 2012. Moral Origins. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. 2014. “The Moral Consequences of Social Selection,” Behavior 151:167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 1992. “Punishment Allows the Evolution of Cooperation (and Anything Else) in Sizable Groups,” Ethology and Sociobiology 13:171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2011. Braintrust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2014. “The Neurobiological Platform for Moral Values,” Behavior 151:283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke-Doane, J. 2012. “Morality and Mathematics: The Evolutionary Challenge,” Ethics 122:313–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 1989. Peacemaking Among Primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. 1992. Chimpanzee Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 1996. Good Natured. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. 2006. Primates and Philosophers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. 2009. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 2013. The Bonobo and the Atheist. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. 2014. “Natural Normativity,” Behavior 151:185204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2013. Religion Without God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 205:581–98.Google Scholar
James, W. 1978. Preface to The Meaning of Truth, published together with Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. 2010. “Varieties of Altruism,” Economics and Philosophy 26:121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. 2011. The Ethical Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. 2014. “Is a Naturalized Ethics Possible?Behavior 151:245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrearty, S., and Brooks, A. S. 2000. “The Revolution That Wasn’t: A New Interpretation of the Origin of Modern Human Behavior,” Journal of Human Evolution 39:453563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1934. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” in Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.), Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce, Vol. V. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 248–71.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., and Shennan, S. 1982. Ranking, Resource, and Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2012. “Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism, and Moral Knowledge,” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7:138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012a. The Evolved Apprentice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012b. “Morality’s Dark Past,” Analyse und Kritik 34:95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, S. 2005. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,” Philosophical Studies 127:109–66.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2009. Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, E. 1926. The Origin and Development of the Moral Ideas, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Antony, L. M. 1998. “Human Nature and Its Role in Feminist Theory,” in Kourany, (ed.), Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 6391.Google Scholar
Antony, L. M. 2000. “Natures and Norms,” Ethics 111:836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aviezer, O., Sagi, A., and Van Ijzendoorn, M. 2002. “Balancing the Family and the Collective in Raising Children: Why Communal Sleeping in Kibbutzim Was Predestined to End,” Family Process 41:435–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, W. 1986. Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beit-Hallahmi, B., and Rabin, A. I. 1977. “The Kibbutz as a Social Experiment and as a Child-Rearing Laboratory,” American Psychologist 32:532–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. 2013. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., and Semmelroth, J. 1992. “Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology,” Psychological Science 3:251–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. 2009. The Origin of Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Foucault, M. 2006. The Chomsky-Foucault Debate: On Human Nature. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. 1977. Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day “Wild Child.” New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 2002. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, F. 2009. The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Downes, S., and Machery, E. 2014. Arguing About Human Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1993. “Facial Expression and Emotion,” American Psychologist 48:384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1971. “Constants Across Cultures in the Face and Emotion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17:124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1979. “Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception,” Psychiatry 32:88105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1969. “The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Usage, and Coding,” Semiotica 1:4998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., and Levinson, S. C. 2009. “The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:429–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, W. T. 2011. “Unity and Diversity in Human Language,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366:376–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M., and Barrett, L. F. 2014. “Perceptions of Emotion from Facial Expressions Are Not Culturally Universal: Evidence from a Remote Culture,” Emotion 14:251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghiselin, M. T. 1997. Metaphysics and the Origins of Species. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H. 2008. “Punishment and Cooperation,” Science 319:1345–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gissis, S., and Jablonka, E. 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golan, S. 1958. “Behavior Research in Collective Settlements in Israel: 2. Collective Education in the Kibbutz,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 28:549–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. E. 2009. “Reconstructing Human Nature,” Journal of the Sydney University Arts Association 31:3057.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 2011. “Our Plastic Nature,” in Gissis, and Jablonka, (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: from Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 319–30.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. and Machery, E. 2008. “Innateness, Canalization, and ‘Biologicizing the Mind,’Philosophical Psychology 21:397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., Machery, E. and Linquist, S. 2009. “The Vernacular Concept of Innateness,” Mind and Language 24:605–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassin, R. R., Aviezer, H., and Bentin, S. 2013. “Inherently Ambiguous: Facial Expressions of Emotions, in Context,” Emotion Review 5:60–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Henney, J. E., Taylor, C. L., and Boon, C. S. 2010. Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., and Gächter, S. 2008. “Antisocial Punishment Across Societies.” Science 319:1362–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hull, D. L. 1986. “On Human Nature,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2:313.Google Scholar
Jaggar, A. M. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2011. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, Frierson, P. and Guyer, P., trans. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1999. “Essence and Perfection,” Ethics 110:5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, J. A. 1998. Philosophy in a Feminist Voice: Critiques and Reconstructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronfeldner, M., Roughley, N., and Toepfer, G. 2014. “Recent Work on Human Nature: Beyond Traditional Essences,” Philosophy Compass 9:642–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. 2001. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewens, T. 2012. “Human Nature: The Very Idea,” Philosophy and Technology 25:459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linquist, S., Machery, E., Griffiths, P. E., and Stotz, K. 2011. “Exploring the Folkbiological Conception of Human Nature,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 366:444–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. 2008. “A Plea for Human Nature,” Philosophical Psychology 21:321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. 2012. “Reconceptualizing Human Nature: Response to Lewens,” Philosophy and Technology 25:475–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. and Barrett, C. 2006. “Debunking Adapting Minds,” Philosophy of Science 73:232–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, N. L., and Russell, J. A. 2013. “Universality Revisited,” Emotion Review 5:815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, G. 2013. “Human Nature in a Post-Essentialist World,” Philosophy of Science 80:983–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapaport, D. 1958. “Behavior Research in Collective Settlements in Israel: VII. The Study of Kibbutz Education and Its Bearing on the Theory of Development,” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 28:587–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1979. Emile or: On Education, Bloom, A., trans. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Safdar, S., Friedlmeier, W., Matsumoto, D., et al. 2009. “Variations of Emotional Display Rules Within and Across Cultures: A Comparison Between Canada, USA, and Japan,” Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement 41:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, R. 2012. “Science and Human Nature,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 70:128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiya, K. 2012. Knowing Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. A. 2011. “Endless Forms: Human Behavioral Diversity and Evolved Universals,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 366:325–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012. The Evolved Apprentice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotz, K. 2010. “Human Nature and Cognitive-Developmental Niche Construction,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9:483501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. 1990. “On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation,” Journal of Personality 58:1767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, D. 2006. “Evolutionary Essentialism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57:425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, S., Timpson, A., Kirsanow, K., et al. 2014. “Direct Evidence for Positive Selection of Skin, Hair, and Eye Pigmentation in Europeans During the Last 5000 y,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:4832–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1978. On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wimsatt, W. C. 1986. “Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment, and the Innate-Acquired Distinction,” in Bechtel, (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 185208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P. 2003. “Non-Essentialist Methods in Pre-Darwinian Taxonomy,” Biology and Philosophy 18:387400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P. 2006. “The Creation of the Essentialism Story: An Exercise in Metahistory,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28:149–74.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnes, B., and Dupré, J. 2008. Genomes and What to Make of Them. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A., and Tobin, E. 2012. “Natural Kinds,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/natural-kinds/.Google Scholar
Brennan, J., and Capel, B. 2004. “One Tissue, Two Fates: Molecular Genetic Events That Underlie Testis Versus Ovary Development,” Nature Reviews Genetics 5:509–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cahill, L. 2006. “Why Sex Matters for Neuroscience.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7:18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Champagne, F. A., and Meaney, M. J. 2006. “Stress During Gestation Alters Postpartum Maternal Care and the Development of the Offspring in a Rodent Model,” Biological Psychiatry 59:1227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champagne, F. A., Weaver, I. C., Diorio, J., et al. 2006. “Maternal Care Associated with Methylation of the Estrogen Receptor-Alpha 1b Promoter and Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in the Medial Preoptic Area of Female Offspring,” Endocrinology 147:2909–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doidge, N. 2007. The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. 2003. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2012. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eicher, E. M., and Washburn, L. L. 1986. “Genetic Control of Primary Sex Determination in Mice,” Annual Review of Genetics 20:327–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 1985. Myths of Gender. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2012. Sex/Gender: Biology in a Social World. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, C. 2000. Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979) [1976]. The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction, Hurley, R., trans. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S. F., and Epel, D. 2009. Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P., and Stotz, K. 2013. Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, B. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. 1948. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. 1953. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Kohler, R. E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Liebers, D., De Knijff, P., and Helbig, A. J. 2004. “The Herring Gull Complex Is Not a Ring Species,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271:893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meloni, M., and Testa, G. 2014. “Scrutinizing the Epigenetics Revolution,” BioSocieties 9: 431–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanney, D. L. 1980. Experimental Ciliatology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Reiter, R. 1975. Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex,” in Reiter, (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157210.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W. 2003. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, D. 1993. “Adaptive Significance of Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Female Physical Attractiveness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:293307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoller, R. J., 1968. Sex and Gender: On the Development of Masculinity and Femininity. New York: Science House.Google Scholar
Unger, Rhoda K. 1979. “Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender,” American Psychologist 34:1085–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., et al. 2003. “The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols,” American Journal of Human Genetics 72:717–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. 1998. “A New Perspective on the Race Debate,” British Journal of Philosophy of Science 49:199225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. 2000. “Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct?Philosophy of Science 67:S653–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. 2004. “The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense,” Biology and Philosophy 19:425–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, R. O. 2005. “The Meaning of Race,” Journal of Philosophy 102:94106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, K. 1992. In My Father’s House: Africa in the Philosophy of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 1996. “Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections,” in Appiah, and Gumann, (eds.), Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 53136.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 2000. “Racial Identity and Racial Identification,” in Back, and Solomos, (eds.), Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 607–15.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 2006. “How to Decide If Races Exist?Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106:363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, K. and Gumann, A. 1996. Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Astuti, R. 1995. “‘The Vezo Are Not a Kind of People’: Identity, Difference and ‘Ethnicity’ Among a Fishing People of Western Madagascar,” American Ethnologist 22:462–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astuti, R., Solomon, G. E., and Carey, S. 2003. “Constraints on Conceptual Development: A Case Study of the Acquisition of Folkbiological and Folksociological Knowledge in Madagascar,” in Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Atran, S. 1998. “Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21:547–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Back, L., and Solomos, J. 2000. Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bamshad, M., Wooding, S., Salisbury, B., and Stephens, J. C. 2004. “Deconstructing the Relationship Between Genetics and Race,” Nature Reviews Genetics 5:598608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, C. L. 2001. “On the Functional Origins of Essentialism,” Mind and Society 3:130.Google Scholar
Bastian, B., and Haslam, N. 2006. “Psychological Essentialism and Stereotype Endorsement,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42:228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, B., and Haslam, N. 2007. “Psychological Essentialism and Attention Allocation: Preferences for Stereotype-Consistent Versus Stereotype Inconsistent Information,” Journal of Social Psychology 147:531–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigler, R., and Liben, L. 2007. “Developmental Intergroup Theory: Explaining and Reducing Children’s Social Stereotyping and Prejudice,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16:162–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolnick, D. 2008. “Individual Ancestry Inference and the Reification of Race as a Biological Phenomenon,” in Koenig, , Lee, , and Richardson, (eds.), Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 7085.Google Scholar
Bouchard, F., and Rosenberg, A. 2004. “Fitness, Probability and the Principles of Natural Selection,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55:693712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. A., and Amelagos, G. J. 2001. “Apportionment of Racial Diversity: A Review,” Evolutionary Anthropology 10:3440.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. 2005. Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, H., and Lefèbvre, C. 2005. Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Condit, C., Parrott, R., Harris, T., Lynch, J., and Dubriwny, T. 2004. “The Role of ‘Genetics’ in Popular Understandings of Race in the United States,” Public Understanding of Science 13:249–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coop, G., Eisen, N. B., Nielsen, R., Przeworski, M., and Rosenberg, N. 2014. “Letters: ‘A Troublesome Inheritance,’” New York Times, August 8.Google Scholar
Cottrell, C. A., and Neuberg, S. L. 2005. “Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups: A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to Prejudice,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:770–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., Richards, D. A., and Nichols, A. L. 2010. “Predicting Policy Attitudes from General Prejudice Versus Specific Intergroup Emotions,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46:247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, C. S., and Schaller, M. 2004. The Social Psychology of Prejudice: Historical and Contemporary Issues. Lawrence, MA: Lewinian Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., DeSteno, D., Williams, L. A., and Hunsinger, M. 2009. “Fanning the Flames of Prejudice: The Influence of Specific Incidental Emotions on Implicit Prejudice,” Emotion 9:585–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dar-Nimrod, I., and Heine, S. 2011. “Genetic Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA,” Psychological Bulletin 137:800–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, J. 1994. “Race Without Color,” Discover November:82–9.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C. 1972. Evolutionary Biology VI. New York: Appelton-Centry-Crofts.Google Scholar
Dubreuil, B. 2010. Human Evolution and the Origins of Hierarchies: The State of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. 1994. The Nature of Emotions: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faucher, L., and Machery, E. 2009. “Racism: Against Jorge Garcia’s Moral and Psychological Monism,” Philosophy of Social Sciences 39:4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., and Duncan, L. A. 2004. “Evolved Disease-Avoidance Mechanisms and Contemporary Xenophobic Attitudes,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 7:333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, A. 2008. “The Bare Bones of Race,” Social Studies of Science 38:657–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, M. W., Lewontin, R. C., and King, M. C. 2003. “Race: A Genetic Melting-Pot,” Nature 424:374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. W., Lewontin, R. C., King, M. C. and Lewontin, R. C. 2008. “Race, Ancestry and Medicine,” in Koenig, , Lee, , and Richardson, (eds.), Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 89101.Google Scholar
Fishbein, H. D. 1996. Peer Prejudice and Discrimination: Evolutionary, Cultural, and Developmental Dynamics. Boulder, CO: WestView.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., and Glick, P. 2006. “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:7783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gannett, L. 2005. “Group Categories and Pharmacogenetics Research,” Philosophy of Science 72:1232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A. 2010. “Modules, Theories, or Islands of Expertise? Domain-Specificity in Socialization,” Child Development 81:715–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, S. A. and Heyman, G. D. 1999. “Carrott-Eaters and Creature-Believers: The Effects of Lexicalization on Children’s Inferences About Social Categories,” Psychological Science 10:490–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-White, F. 1999. “How Thick Is blood? The Plot Thickens: If Ethnic Actors Are Primordialists, What Remains of the Circumstantialists/Primordialists Controversy?Ethnic and Racial Studies 22:789820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-White, F. 2001a. “Are Ethnic Groups Biological ‘Species’ to the Human Brain,” Current Anthropology 42:515–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-White, F. 2001b. “Sorting Is Not Categorization: A Critique of the Claim That Brazilians Have Fuzzy Racial Categories,” Cognition and Culture 1:219–50.Google Scholar
Gil-White, F. 2005. “How Conformism Creates Ethnicity Creates Conformism (And Why This Matters to Lots of Things.” The Monist 88(2):189237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, J. M. 2003. “On the New Biology of Race,” Journal of Philosophy 9:456–74.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. M. 2009. A Theory of Race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. M. 2011. “Another Look at the Reality of Race, By Which I Mean Race-f,” in Hazlett, (ed.), New Waves of Metaphysics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 5471.Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. M., Shulman, J. L., and Covarrubias, E. G. 2009. “The Ordinary Conception of Race in the United States and Its Relation to Racial Attitudes: A New Approach,” Journal of Cognition and Culture 9:1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. D. 2014. “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics,” Ethics 124:695726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, T. 2015. “A Non-Essentialist Theory of Race: The Case of an Afro-Indigenous Village in Northern Peru,” Social Anthropology 23:135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardimon, M. O. 2003. “The Ordinary Concept of Race,” Journal of Philosophy 100:437–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardimon, M. O. 2012. “The Idea of a Scientific Concept of Race,” Journal of Philosophical Research 37:249–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., and Ernst, D. 2000. “Essentialist Beliefs About Social Categories,” British Journal of Social Psychology 39:113–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., Ernst, D., Bastian, B., Bain, P., and Kashima, Y. 2006. “Psychological Essentialism, Implicit Theories, and Intergroup Relations,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9:6376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, A. 2011. New Waves of Metaphysics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., and Boyd, R. 1998. “The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences,” Evolution and Human Behavior 19:215–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, A. 2013. “Racial Discrimination: How Not to Do It,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 3:278–86.Google Scholar
Huang, J., Sedlovaskaya, A., Acherman, J., and Bargh, J. 2011. “Immunizing Against Prejudice: Effects of Disease Protection on Attitudes Toward Out-Groups,” Psychological Science 22:1550–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, N. 1996. “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-Century Thought.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 29:247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarayatne, T., Ybarra, O., Shledon, J., et al. 2006. “White Americans’ Genetic Lay Theories of Race Differences and Sexual Orientation: Their Relationship with Prejudice Toward Blacks, Gay Men and Lesbians,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9:7794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanovski, M. 2007. “Essentialism and Folksociology: Ethnicity Again,” Journal of Cognition and Culture 7:241–81.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. M. 2010. “When Socially Determined Categories Make Biological Realities,” The Monist 93:283–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, J. M. 2011. “Race: What Biology Can Tell Us About a Social Construct,” in Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. M. 2014. “Ignorance, Lies, and Ways of Being Racist,” Critical Race Theory 2:160–82.Google Scholar
Keller, J. 2005. “In Genes We Trust: The Biological Component of Psychological Essentialism and Its Relationship to Mechanisms of Motivated Social Cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:686702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D., Faucher, L., and Machery, E. 2010. “Getting Rid of Racism: Assessing Three Proposals in Light of Psychological Evidence,” Journal of Social Philosophy 41:293322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., and Haidt, J. 1999. “Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis,” Cognition and Emotion 13:505–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, H. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., and Spelke, E. 2011. “Do Infants Show Social Preferences for People Differing in Race?Cognition 119:19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitcher, P. 2003. “Race, Ethnicity, Biology, Culture,” in Kitcher, Philip (ed.), In Mendel’s Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2007. “Does ‘Race’ Have a Future?Philosophy and Public Affairs 35:293317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, C. 2010. “Images Are Not the Evidence in Neuroimaging,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61:265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., and Haidt, J. 2001. “Social Functions of Emotions,” in Mayne, and Bonanno, (eds.), Emotions: Current Issues and Future Directions. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 192213.Google Scholar
Koenig, B., Lee, S., and Richardson, S. 2008. Revisiting Race in a Genomic Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Knobe, J. 2007. “Experimental Philosophy,” Philosophy Compass 2:8192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., and Neuberg, S. L. 2005. “Managing Ingroup and Outgroup Relationships,” in Buss, (ed.), Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 653–75.Google Scholar
LaFollette, H. 2003. The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, S.-J. 2014. “Carving Up the Social World with Generics,” Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy 1:208–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, S.-J. Forthcoming. “The Original Sin of Cognition: Fear, Prejudice, and Generalization,” Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Levenson, R. W. 1994. “Human Emotion: A Functional View,” in Ekman, and Davidson, (eds.), The Nature of Emotions: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–6.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., Haviland-Jones, M., and Barrett, L. F. 2008. Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1972. “The Apportionment of Human Diversity,” in Dobzhansky, , Hecht, , and Steere, (eds.), Evolutionary Biology VI. New York: Appelton-Centry-Crofts, pp. 381–98.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. 2007. “The Architecture of Human Kin Detection,” Nature 445:727–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, J., and Kittle, R. 2009. “Human Genetic Diversity and the Nonexistence of Biological Races,” Human Biology 81:777–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorusso, L., and Bacchini, F. 2015. “A Reconsideration of the Role of Self-Identified Races in Epidemiology and Biomedical Research,” Studies of History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 52:5664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. 2008. “A Plea for Human Nature,” Philosophical Psychology 21:321–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. 2014. “In Defense of Reverse Inference,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65:251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. and Faucher, L. 2005a. “Social Construction and the Concept of Race,” Philosophy of Science 72:1208–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. and Faucher, L. 2005b. “Why Do We Think Racially? Culture, Evolution and Cognition,” in Cohen, and Lefèbvre, (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York: Elsevier, pp. 1009–33.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., and Smith, E. R. 2002. From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Maglo, K. N. 2010. “Genomics and the Conundrum of Race: Some Epistemological and Ethical Considerations,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53:357–72.Google Scholar
Mallon, R. 2006. “Race: Normative, Not Metaphysical or Semantic,” Ethics 116:525–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, R. 2013. “Was Race Thinking Invented in the Modern West?Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44:7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, R. and Kelly, D. 2012. “Making Race Out of Nothing: Psychological Constrained Social Roles,” in Kincaid, (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford University Press, pp. 507–29.Google Scholar
Martinovic, B., and Verkuyten Ercomer, M. 2012. “Host National and Religious Identification Among Turkish Muslims in Western Europe: The Role of Ingroup Norms, Perceived Discrimination and Value Incompatibility,” European Journal of Social Psychology 42:893903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, T., and Bonanno, G. A. 2001. Emotions: Current Issues and Future Directions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., Asher, B., Kerr, N., and Navarrette, C. D. 2011. “Fertility and Intergroup Bias in Racial and Minimal-Group Contexts: Evidence for Shared Architecture,” Psychological Science 22:860–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElreath, R., Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J. 2003. “Shared Norms Can Lead to the Evolution of Ethnic Markers,” Current Anthropology 44:122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagu, A. 1962. “The Concept of Race,” American Anthropologist 64:919–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, C., and Boyd, R. 2015. “A Functionalist Framework with Illustrations from the Peruvian Altiplano,” Human Nature 26:127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neander, K. 1991. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense,” Philosophy of Science 58:168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. 2001. The Evolution of Subjective Commitment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., and Cottrell, C. A. 2002. “Intergroup Emotions: A Biocultural Approach,” in Mackie, and Smith, (eds.), From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 265–84.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., and Cottrell, C. A. 2006. “Evolutionary Bases of Prejudices,” in Schaller, , Simpson, , and Kenrick, (eds.), Evolution and Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 163–87.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., and Cottrell, C. A. 2008. “Managing the Threats and Opportunities Afforded by Human Sociality,” Group Dynamics 21:6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., Cottrell, C. A., Kenrick, D. T. and Schaller, M. 2011. “Human Threat Management Systems: Self-Protection and Disease Avoidance,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35:1042–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novembre, J., Johnson, T., Bryc, K., et al. 2008. “Genes Mirror Geography in Europe,” Nature 456:98101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omi, M., and Winant, H. 1994. Racial Formation in the United-States: From the 1960s to the 1990s, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pääbo, S. 2003. “The Mosaic That Is Our Genome,” Nature 421:409–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker Tapias, M., Glaser, J., and Keltner, D. 2007. “Emotion and Prejudice: Specific Emotions Toward Outgroups,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 10:2739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauker, K., Ambady, N., and Apfelbaum, E. P. 2010. “Race Salience and Essentialist Thinking in Racial Stereotype Development,” Child Development 81:17991813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peralta, C. A., Risch, N., Lin, F., et al. 2009. “The Association of African Ancestry and Elevated Creatinine in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study,” American Journal of Nephrology 31:202–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., and Feldman, N. M. 2013. “The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs About Essential Racial Differences: A Backdoor to Eugenics,” American Sociological Review, 78:167–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plante, C., Roberts, S., Snider, J., et al. 2015. “‘More Than Skin-Deep’: Biological Essentialism in Response to a Distinctiveness Threat in a Stigmatized Fan Community,” British Journal of Social Psychology 54:359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piglucci, M. 2013. “What Are We to Make of the Concept of Race? Thoughts of a Philosopher-Scientist,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44:272–7.Google Scholar
Piglucci, M. and Kaplan, J. M. 2003. “On the Concept of Biological Race and Its Applicability to Humans,” Philosophy of Science 70:1161–72.Google Scholar
Prentice, D., and Miller, D. 2007. “Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16:202–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnier, D. 2015. “Clean People, Unclean People: The Essentialisation of ‘Slaves’ Among the Southern Betsileo of Madagascar,” Social Anthropology 23:152–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., and Tworek, C. 2012. “Cultural Transmission of Social Essentialism,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:13526–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richerson, P. J., and Boyd, R. 2001. “The Evolution of Subjective Commitment to Groups: The Tribal Instincts Hypothesis,” in Nesse, (ed.), The Evolution of Subjective Commitment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 186220.Google Scholar
Risch, N., Burchard, E., Ziv, E., and Tang, H. 2002. “Categorization of Humans in Biomedical Research: Genes, Race and Disease,” Genome Biology 3:112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N. 2011. “A Population-Genetic Perspective on Similarities and Differences Among Worldwide Human Populations,” Human Biology 83:5964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., et al. 2002. “Genetic Structure of Human Populations,” Science 298:2381–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Ramachandran, M. S., Zhao, C., Pritchard, J. K., and Feldman, M. W. 2005. “Clines, Clusters, and the Effect of Study Design on the Inference of Human Population Structure,” PLoS Genetic 1:660–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, A., and Bouchard, F. 2003. “Fitness,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2007 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2007/entries/fitness/.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. 2010. “How Does Neuroscience Affect Our Conception of Volition,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:109–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaller, M., and Conway, L. G. 2004. “The Substance of Prejudice: Biological- and Social-Evolutionary Perspectives on Cognition, Culture and the Contents of Stereotypical Beliefs,” in Crandall, and Schaller, (eds.), The Social Psychology of Prejudice: Historical and Contemporary Issues. Lawrence, MA: Lewinian Press, pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., Conway, L. G. and Neuberg, S. L. 2012. “Danger, Disease, and the Nature of Prejudice(s),” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 46:154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., and Kenrick, D. T. 2006. Evolution and Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Serre, D., and Pääbo, S. 2004. “Evidence for Gradients of Human Genetic Diversity Within and Among Continents,” Genome Reasearch 14:1679–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Sesardic, N. 2010. “Race: A Social Destruction of a Biological Concept,” Biology and Philosophy 25:143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiao, J., Bode, T., Beyer, A., and Selvig, D. 2012. “The Genomic Challenge to the Social Construction of Race,” Sociological Theory 30:6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, J. L., and Glasgow, J. 2010. “Is Race-Thinking Biological or Social, and Does It Matter for Racism? An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Social Philosophy 41:244–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, P., Atran, S., and Medin, D. 2002. “Essentialism and Folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil,” Journal of Cognition and Culture 2:195223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Q. 2012. “What ‘Biological Racial Realism’ Should Mean,” Philosophical Studies 159:181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Q. 2013. “Biological Theory and the Metaphysics of Race: A Reply to Kaplan and Winther,” Biological Theory 8:114–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Q. 2014a. “A Radical Solution to the Race Problem,” Philosophy of Science, 81:1025–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Q. 2014b. “The Unnatural Racial Naturalism,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 46:7987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, Q. 2015. “Philosophy of Race Meets Population Genetics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 52:4655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, P. 2011. “Rehabilitating a Biological Notion of Race? A Response to Sesardic,” Biology and Philosophy 26:469–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, A. 1998. “Human Races: A Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective,” American Anthropologist 100:632–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tishkoff, S. A., and Kidd, K. K. 2004. “Implications of Biogeography in Human Populations for ‘Race’ and ‘Medicine,’Nature Genetics 36 (Suppl):S21–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. 2008. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Emotions and Their Relationship to Internal Regulatory Variables,” in Lewis, , Haviland-Jones, , and Barrett, (eds.), Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn. New York: Guilford, pp. 114–37.Google Scholar
Weiss, K. M., and Fullerton, S. M. 2005. “Racing Around, Getting Nowhere,” Evolutionary Anthropology 14:165–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. J., and Eberhardt, J. L. 2008. “Biological Conceptions of Race and the Motivation to cross Racial Boundaries,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94:1033–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. F., Weale, M. E., Smith, A. C., et al. 2001. “Population Genetic Structure of Variable Drug Response,” Nature Genetics 29:265–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zack, N. 1998. Thinking About Race. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Zack, N. 2002. Philosophy of Science and Race. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zack, N. 2003. “Race and Racial Discrimination,” in LaFollette, (ed.): 245–71.Google Scholar
Zakharia, F., Basu, A., Absher, D., et al. 2009. “Characterizing the Admixed African Ancestry of African Americans,” Genome Biology 10:R141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcock, J. 2001. The Triumph of Sociobiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. 1979. Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Baghramian, M. 2012. Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D. 1979. The Whisperings Within. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Beebee, H., and Sabbarton-Leary, N. 2010. The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, N. 1980. Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 1980. “Materialism Without Reductionism: What Physicalism Does Not Entail,” in Block, (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 167.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 1999. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa,” in Wilson, (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 141–85.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 2001. “Reference, (In)Commensurability, and Meanings: Some (Perhaps) Unanticipated Complexities,” in Hoyningen-Huene, and Sankey, (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 164.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 2010a. “Realism, Natural Kinds, and Philosophical Methods,” Beebee, and Sabbarton-Leary, (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge, pp. 212–34.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 2010b. “Homeostasis, Higher Taxa and Monophyly,” Philosophy of Science 77:686701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. N. 2012. “What of Pragmatism with the World Here?” in Baghramian, (ed.), Reading Putnam. New York: Routledge, pp. 3994.Google Scholar
Brown, S., and Lewis, B. P. 2004. “Relational Dominance and Mate-Selection Criteria: Evidence That Males Attend to Female Dominance,” Evolution and Human Behavior 25:406–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, D. 2005. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. and Hardcastle, V. G. 2000. “Evolutionary Psychology, Meet Developmental Neurobiology: Against Promiscuous Modularity,” Brain and Mind 1:307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1989. “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures,” Behavior and Brain Sciences 12:114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2006. The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdan, E. 2013. “What Is a Human Universal? Human Behavioral Ecology and Human Nature,” in Downes, and Machery, (eds.), Arguing About Human Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cimino, A., and Andrew, W. D. 2010. “On the Perception of Newcomers: Toward an Evolved Psychology of Intergenerational Coalitions.” Human Nature 21:186202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1997. Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Daly, M., and Wilson, M. 1985. “Child Abuse and Other Risks of Not Living with Both Parents,” Ethology and Sociobiology 6:197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., and Harman, G. 1972. The Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, S. M., and Machery, E. 2013. Arguing About Human Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Earley, J. 2008. “How Philosophy of Mind Needs Philosophy of Chemistry.” Hyle: The International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 14:126.Google Scholar
Fedyk, M. 2014. “How (Not) to Bring Psychology and Biology Together,” Philosophical Studies 172:949–67.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1954. Fact Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Veba, E. J. 1982. “Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form,” Paleobiology 8:415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., and Bjorklund, F. 2008. “Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Moral Psychology,” in Sinnott-Armstron, (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 181217.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., and Diamond, L. 2000. “The Place of Mating in Human Attachment,” Review of General Psychology 4:186204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, J., and Mele, A. 1993. Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, P., and Sankey, H. 2001. Incommensurability and Related Matters. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. 1978. “A Matter of Individuality,” Philosophy of Science 45:335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E., and Lamb, M. J. 2006. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2005. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1993. “The Non-Reductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation,” in Heil, and Mele, (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 1972. “Naming and Necessity,” in Davidson, and Harman, (eds.), The Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht Netherlands: D. Reidel, pp. 253–5.Google Scholar
Lehrman, D. S. 1953. “Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior,” Quarterly Review of Biology 28:337–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnus, P. D. 2011. “Drakes, Seadevils, and Similarity Fetishism,” Biology and Philosophy 26:857–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Populations, Species, and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:454–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, W. C., Miller, L. C., Putcha-Bhagavatula, A. D., and Yang, Y. 2002. “Evolved Sex Differences in the Number of Partners Desired? The Long and the Short of It.” Psychological Science 13:157–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, R. C. 2007. Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieppel, O. 2005a. “Modules, Kinds and Homology,” Journal of Experimental Zoology B 304:1827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieppel, O. 2005b. “Monophyly, Paraphyly and Natural Kinds,” Biology and Philosophy 20:465–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. 1993. “Adaptive Significance of Female Physical Attractiveness: Role of Waist-to-Hip Ratio,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:293307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. Moral Psychology, Vol. II: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Street, S. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,” Philosophical Studies 127:109–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, N. 1992. “Nonmoral Explanations,” in Tomberlin, (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 6. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1951. The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomberlin, J. E. 1992. Philosophical Perspectives 6. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P. 2001a. “Characters, Units and Natural Kinds: An Introduction,” in Wagner, (ed.), The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 110Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P. 2001b. The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. 2003. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1978. On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, J. 2006. “On Characterizing the Physical,” Philosophical Studies 131:6199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. 1999. Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariew, A., and Cummins, R. 2002. Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Towards a Unified Understanding of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. 2002. Brainwise: Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2004. Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Downes, S., and Machery, E. 2014. Arguing About Human Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1989. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2005. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, G. 2011. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments,” Noûs 45:103–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingsbury, J., Ryde, D., and Williford, K. 2012. Millikan and Her Critics. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. S. 2011. The Ethical Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1993. Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G., and Papineau, D. 2006. Teleosemantics: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. 2008. “A Plea for Human Nature,” Philosophical Psychology 21:321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. and Faucher, L. 2005. “Why Do We Think Racially? Culture, Evolution and Cognition,” in Cohen, H. and Lefèbvre, C. (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Catagories. Cambrdige, MA: Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munz, P. 1993. Philosophical Darwinism: On the Origin of Knowledge by Means of Natural Selection. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function,’Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:454–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, S., and Binmore, K. 2014. Evolution and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2001. “The Status of Teleosemantics, or How to Stop Worrying About Swampman,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79:7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. 1990. A Useful Inheritance: Evolutionary Aspects of the Theory of Knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1986. Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. L. 2013. “Self-Deception: A Teleofunctional Approach,” Philosophia 42:181–99.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought in a Hostile World. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012. The Evolved Apprentice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, S. 2005. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,” Philosophical Studies 127:109–66.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by David Livingstone Smith, University of New England, Maine
  • Book: How Biology Shapes Philosophy
  • Online publication: 10 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295490.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by David Livingstone Smith, University of New England, Maine
  • Book: How Biology Shapes Philosophy
  • Online publication: 10 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295490.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by David Livingstone Smith, University of New England, Maine
  • Book: How Biology Shapes Philosophy
  • Online publication: 10 November 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295490.015
Available formats
×