Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:34:52.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2020

Mark Edward Lewis
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ban, Gu 班固 (32-92 CE) et al. Bo hu tong de lun 白虎通德論. Annotated by Rong, Cheng 程榮. In Han Wei congshu 漢魏叢書, Vol. 1. Taipei: Xinxing, 1977.Google Scholar
Ban, Gu.Liang du fu 兩都賦.” In Wen xuan 文選. Ed. Tong, Xiao 蕭統 (501–531 CE). Hong Kong: Shangwu, rep. ed. 1978.Google Scholar
Cai, Yong 蔡邕 (132–192 CE). Cai Zhonglang ji, wai ji 蔡中郎集, 外集ji yao, . Si bu ed. Taipei: Xinxing, 1959.Google Scholar
Chang, Qu 常璩 (fl. 347 CE). Huayang guo zhi jiao zhu 華陽國志校注. Annotated by Lin, Liu 劉琳. Taipei: Xin Wen Feng, 1988.Google Scholar
Chun qiu fan lu yizheng 春秋繁露義證. Annotated by Yu, Su 蘇輿. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1992.Google Scholar
Da Dai li ji jie gu 大戴禮記解詁. Annotated by Pinzhen, Wang 王聘珍. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1964.Google Scholar
Dong guan Han ji jiao zhu 東觀漢記校注. Comp. Liu Zhen 劉珍 et al., annotated by Shuping, Wu 吳樹平. Beijing: Zhonghua, 2008.Google Scholar
Gan, Bao 干寶. Sou shen ji 搜神記. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1979.Google Scholar
[Chun qiu] Gongyangzhuan zhu shu 春秋公羊傳注疏. In Shisan jing zhushu 十三經注疏, Vol. 7. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976.Google Scholar
Guanzi jiaozheng 管子校正. Annotated by Wang, Dai 戴望. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng 新編諸子集成, Vol. 5. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Guo yu 國語. Shanghai: Guji, 1978.Google Scholar
Han bei ji shi 漢碑集釋. Annotated by Wen, Gao 高文. Kaifeng: Henan Daxue, 1985.Google Scholar
Han Feizi ji shi 韓非子集釋. Annotated by Qiyou, Chen 陳奇猷. Shanghai: Renmin, 1974.Google Scholar
Han shi wai zhuan ji shi 韓氏外傳集釋. Compiled by Han Ying 韓嬰 (fl. 150 BCE). Annotated by Weiyu, Xu 許維遹. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1980.Google Scholar
Han shu 漢書. Written by Ban Gu et al. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1962.Google Scholar
Hou Han shu 後漢書. Compiled by Fan Ye 范曄 (398–446 CE). Beijing: Zhonghua, 1965.Google Scholar
Huainanzi 淮南子. Annotated by You, Gao 高誘. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 7. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Huan, Kuan 桓寬. Yan tie lun 鹽鐵論. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng 新編諸子集成, Vol. 2. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Huan, Tan 桓譚. Huan Tan “Xin Lun” 新論. Compiled by Zeyu, Wu 吳則虞. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian, 2014.Google Scholar
Jia, Yi 賈誼 (200–169 BCE). Jiazi xin shu jiaoshi 賈子新書校釋. Annotated by Yuzhang, Qi 祁玉章. Taipei: Qi Yuzhang, 1974.Google Scholar
Jin shu 晉書. Comp. Xuanling, Fang 方玄齡 (578–648 CE) et al. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1974.Google Scholar
Kandai sekkoku shūsei 漢代石刻集成. Compiled by Hidemasa, Nagata 永田英正. 2 vols. Kyoto: Dōshōsha, 1994.Google Scholar
Kongzi jia yu 孔子家語. Annotated by Su, Wang 王肅(195–256 CE). In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 2. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Li ji zhu shu 禮記注疏. In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 5. Taipei: Yiwen, 1974.Google Scholar
Li shi 隷釋. Comp. Hong Gua 洪适 (1117–1184 CE). In Shi ke shiliao jia bian 石刻史料甲編, Vols. 1– 2. Ed. Gengwang, Yan 嚴耕望. Taipei: Yiwen, 1966.Google Scholar
Li Xu 隷續. Comp. Gua, Hong. In Shi ke shiliao jia bian, Vol. 3. Ed. Gengwang, Yan. Taipei: Yiwen, 1966.Google Scholar
Liu, Xie 劉勰 (465–522 CE). Wen xin diao long zhu 文心雕龍註. Annotated by Wenlan, Fan 范文灡. Beijing: Renmin Wenxue, 1978.Google Scholar
Liu tao zhi jie 六韜直解. In Ming ben wu jing qi shu zhi jie 明本武經七書直解, Vol. 2. Ed. Yin, Liu 劉寅. Taipei: Shi di jiaoyu, 1972.Google Scholar
Lu, Jia 陸賈. Chu Han chun qiu 楚漢春秋. In Congshu ji cheng chu pian 叢書集成出篇, Vol. 3759. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1991.Google Scholar
Lu, Jia. Xin yu jiao zhu 新語校注. Annotated by Liqi, Wang 王利器. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1986.Google Scholar
Lü shi chun qiu jiao shi 呂氏春秋校釋. Ed. Qiyou, Chen 陳奇猷. Shanghai: Xuelin, 1984.Google Scholar
Lun yu zheng yi 論語正義. Annotated by Baonan, Liu 劉寶楠 and Gongmian, Liu 劉恭冕. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 1. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Mao shi zheng yi 毛詩正義. Annotated by Xuan, Zheng 鄭玄 (127–200 CE). In Shi san jing zhu shu, Vol. 2. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976.Google Scholar
Mengzi zheng yi 孟子正義. Annotated by Xun, Jiao 焦循. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 1. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Mozi jiangu 墨子間詁. Annotated by Yirang, Sun 孫詒讓. In Xian bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 6. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Qi jia Hou Han shu 七家後漢書. Comp. Wentai, Wang 王文臺 (1796–1844). Taipei: Wenhai, 1972.Google Scholar
San guo zhi 三國志. Comp. Shou, Chen 陳壽 (233–297). Beijing: Zhonghua, 1959.Google Scholar
Shang shu zheng yi 尚書正義. Annotated by Anguo, Kong 孔安國 (156–74 BCE). In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 1. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976.Google Scholar
Shi ji 史記. Written by Qian, Sima 司馬遷 (d. 86 BCE) and Tan, Sima 司馬談 (165–110 BCE). Beijing: Zhonghua, 1959.Google Scholar
Shi ming shu zheng bu 釋名疏證補. Liu Xi 劉煕 (fl. 200 CE). Annotated by Xianqian, Wang 王先謙 (1842–1918). Shanghai: Guji, 1984.Google Scholar
Shui jing zhu bei lu 水經註碑錄. Annotated by Zhicun, Shi 施蟄存. Tianjin: Tianjin Guji, 1987.Google Scholar
Shuihudi Qin mu zhujian 睡虎地秦墓竹簡. Beijing: Wenwu 1978.Google Scholar
Shuo wen jie zi zhu 說文解字注. By Shen, Xu 許慎 (58–147 CE). Annotated by Yucai, Duan 段玉裁 (1735–1815). Taipei: Yiwen, 1974.Google Scholar
Shuo yuan jiao zheng 說苑校證. Compiled by Xiang, Liu 劉向 (77–6 BCE). Annotated by Zonglu, Xiang 向宗魯. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1987.Google Scholar
Sima fa zhi jie 司馬法直解. In Ming ben wu jing qi shu zhi jie, Vol. 1. Ed. Yin, Liu. Taipei: Shi di jiaoyu, 1972.Google Scholar
Sun Bin bing fa jiao li 孫臏兵法校理. Ed. Zhenze, Zhang 張震澤. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1984.Google Scholar
Sunzi zhi jie 孫子直解. In Ming ben wu jing qi shu zhi jie, Vol. 1. Ed. Yin, Liu. Taipei: Shi di jiaoyu, 1972.Google Scholar
Wang, Chong 王充 (27–100 CE). Lun heng ji jie 論衡集解. Annotated by Pansui, Liu 劉盼遂. Beijing: Guji, 1957.Google Scholar
Wang, Fu 王符 (c. 82–167 CE). Qian fu lun jian 潛夫論箋. Annotated by Jipei, Wang 汪繼培. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1979.Google Scholar
Wang, Fu. Qian fu lun. In Han Wei congshu 漢魏叢書, Vol. 2. Taipei: Xinxing, 1977.Google Scholar
Wei Liaozi jiao zhu 尉繚子校注. Annotated by Zhaohua, Zhong 鍾兆華. Henan: Zhong Zhou shu hua she, 1982.Google Scholar
Wei Liaozi qian shuo 淺說. Annotated by Yong, Xu 徐勇. Beijing: Jiefang Jun, 1989.Google Scholar
Wei Liaozi zhi jie. In Ming ben wu jing qi shu zhi jie, Vol. 2. Ed. Yin, Liu. Taipei: Shi di jiaoyu, 1972.Google Scholar
Wei, Shou 魏收 (506–572 CE). Wei shu 魏書. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1974.Google Scholar
Wen xuan 文選. Ed. Tong, Xiao 蕭統 (501–531 CE). Hong Kong: Shangwu, rep. ed. 1978.Google Scholar
Wuzi zhi jie 吳子. In Ming ben wu jing qi shu zhi jie, Vol. 1. Taipei: Shi di jiaoyu, 1972.Google Scholar
Xi jing za ji 西京雜記. Compiled c. 500 CE. In Han Wei Liuchao biji xiaoshuo daguan 漢魏六朝筆記小說大關. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 1999.Google Scholar
Xian Qin Han Wei Jin Nanbeichao shi 先秦漢魏晉南北朝詩. Comp. Qinli, Lu 逯欽立. 3 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1983.Google Scholar
Xiao jing zhu shu 孝經注疏. In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 8. Taipei: Yiwen, 1974.Google Scholar
Xin xu jiao shi 新序校釋. Comp. Xiang, Liu 劉向 (77–6 BCE). Annotated by Guangying, Shi 石光瑛. Beijing: Zhonghua, 2001.Google Scholar
Xu, Gan 徐幹 (170–217 CE). Zhong lun 中論. In Han Wei congshu. Taipei: Xinxing, 1977.Google Scholar
Xun, Yue 荀悅 (148–209 CE). Han ji 漢紀. Taiwan: Shangwu, 1971.Google Scholar
Xun, Yue. Shen jian 申鍳. In Xin bian zhuzi ji cheng, Vol. 2. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Xunzi jijie 荀子集解. Annotated by Xianqian, Wang 王先謙. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 2. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Yan Danzi 燕丹子. In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 8. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Yan, Kejun 嚴可均, ed. Quan shanggu Sandai Qin Han Sanguo Liuchao wen 全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1965.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiong 揚雄 (53 BCE-CE 18). Tai xuan ji zhu 太玄集注. Commentary by Guang, Sima 司馬光 (1019–1086 CE). Beijing: Zhonghua,1998.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiong. Yangzi Fa yan 揚子法言. Annotated by Gui, Li 李軌 (fl. c. 300 CE). In Xin bian zhuzi jicheng, Vol. 2. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
Yanzi chun qiu ji shi 晏子春秋集釋. Annotated by Zeyu, Wu 吳則虞. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1962.Google Scholar
Yi li zhu shu 儀禮注疏. In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 4. Taipei: Yiwen, 1974.Google Scholar
Yi Zhou shu huijiao jizhu 逸周書彙校集注. Ed. Huaixin, Huang 黃懷信, Mourong, Zhang 張懋鎔, and Xudong, Tian 田旭東. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 1995.Google Scholar
Ying, Shao 應劭 (140–206 CE). Fengsu tong yi jiao shi 風俗通義校釋. Annotated by Shuping, Wu 吳樹平. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin, 1980.Google Scholar
Yuan, Hong 袁宏 (328–376 CE). Hou Han ji 後漢記. Shanghai: Shangwu, 1929.Google Scholar
Zhan guo ce 戰國策. Shanghai: Guji, 1978.Google Scholar
Zhang, Heng 張衡. Zhang Heng shi wen ji jiao zhu 張衡詩文集校注. Annotated by Zhenze, Zhang 張震澤. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 2009.Google Scholar
Zhou li zhu shu 周禮注疏. In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 3. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976.Google Scholar
Zhou yi zheng yi 周易正義. In Shisan jing zhushu, Vol. 1. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976.Google Scholar
Zhuangzi ji shi 莊子集釋. Annotated by Qingfan, Guo 郭慶藩. In Xin bian zhuzi ji cheng, Vol. 3. Taipei: Shijie, 1974.Google Scholar
[Chun qiu] Zuo zhuan zhu 春秋佐傳注. Annotated by Bojun, Yang 楊伯峻. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1981.Google Scholar
Zuo Tradition = Zuozhuan: Commentary on the “Spring and Autumn Annals”. Translated and Introduced by Stephen Durrant, Wai-yee Li, and David Schaberg. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abu-Lughod, Lila. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Adamson, Joseph. Melville, Shame, and the Evil Eye: A Psychoanalytic Reading. Albany: SUNY Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. Moral Values and Political Behavior in Ancient Greece from Homer to the End of the Fifth Century. New York, W. W. Norton, 1972.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Church and the Kingdom. Tr. Leland de la Durantaye. London: Seagull, 2012.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Coming Community. Tr. Michael Hardt. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life. Tr. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Tr. Lorenzo Chiesa. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Opus Dei: An Archaeology of Duty. Tr. Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Tr. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: Zone, 2002.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Tr. Patricia Dailey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Sarah. Buried Ideas: Legends of Abdication and Ideal Government in Recently Discovered Early Chinese Bamboo Manuscripts. Albany: SUNY Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Allan, Sarah. The Heir and the Sage: Dynastic Legend in Early China. San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center, 1981.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle S. The World of Prometheus: The Politics of Punishing in Democratic Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Anglet, Kurt. Messianität und Geschichte: Walter Benjamins Konstruktion der historischen Dialektik und deren Aufhebung ins Eschatologie durch Erik Peterson. Berlin: Akademie, 1995.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York: W. W. Norton, 2010.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, Gary. “Restoring Dong Zhongshu (BCE 195–115): An Experiment in Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction.” Ph.D. diss. University of British Columbia, 1991.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. Paperback ed. New York: Penguin, 1963.Google Scholar
Aristotle. “Art” of Rhetoric. Tr. John Henry Freese. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Asano, Yūichi 淺野裕一. Kō Rō dō no seiritsu to tenkai 黃老道の成立と展開. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1992.Google Scholar
Asselin, Mark Laurent. “‘A Significant Season’: Literature in a Time of Endings: Cai Yong and a Few Contemporaries.” Ph.D. diss. University of Washington, 1997.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badinter, Elisabeth. Les passions intellectuelles, Vol. I: Désirs de gloire (1735–1751). Paris: Fayard, 1999; Vol. II: Exigence de dignité. Paris: Fayard, 2002; Vol. III: Volonté de pouvoir. Paris: Fayard, 2007.Google Scholar
Barbieri-Low, Anthony J. and Yates, Robin D. S.. Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China: A Study with Critical Edition and Translation of the Legal Texts from Zhangjiashan Tomb No. 247. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen. Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Carlin A.The Roman Blush: The Delicate Matter of Self-Control.” In Constructions of the Classical Body. Ed. Porter, James I.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999. Pp. 212234.Google Scholar
Barton, Carlin A. Roman Honor: The Fire in the Bones. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Carlin A. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael. Bitter Carnival: Ressentiment and the Abject Hero. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielenstein, Hans. The Bureaucracy of Han Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeley, Barry B. “‘On the Authenticity and Nature of the Zuo zhuan’ Revisited.” Early China 29 (2004): 217267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blok, Anton. The Mafia of a Sicilian Village 1860–1960: A Study of Violent Peasant Entrepreneurs. London: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar
Bodde, Derk and Morris, Clarence. Law in Imperial China: Exemplified by 190 Ch’ing Dynasty Cases Translated from the Hsing-an hui-lan. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit, 1976.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. Martyrdom and Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E. Ancestral Memory in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E.Eastern Han Commemorative Stelae: Laying the Cornerstones of Public Memory.” In Early Chinese Religion, Part One: Shang through Han (1250 BC–220 AD). Ed. Lagerwey, John and Kalinowski, Marc. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2009. Pp. 10271059.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E. “Evoking the Ancestor: The Stele Hymn of the Eastern Han Dynasty (25–220 CE).” Ph.D. diss. Cambridge University, 1997.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E. Public Memory in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E.The Spirit Lord of Baishi Mountain: Feeding the Deities or Heeding the Yinyang?Early China 26–27 (2001–2002): 159231.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E.Symbolic Discourse in Eastern Han Memorial Art: The Case of the Birchleaf Pear.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 65:2 (2005): 281310.Google Scholar
Brashier, Kenneth E.Text and Ritual in Early Chinese Stelae.” In Text and Ritual in Early China. Ed. Kern, Martin. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005. Pp. 249–284.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. Takeo.Heaven, Li, and Formation of the Zuozhuan.” Oriens Extremus 44 (2003–2004): 51100.Google Scholar
Brooks, E. Bruce and Brooks, A. Takeo. The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Brown, Miranda.Mothers and Sons in Warring States and Han China.” NAN NÜ: Men, Women and Gender in Early and Imperial China 5:2 (2003): 137169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Miranda. The Politics of Mourning in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Peter. Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianisation of the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The Making of Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. The World of Late Antiquity AD 150–750. London: Thames & Hudson, 1971.Google Scholar
Bu, Xianqun 卜憲群. “Cong jiandu kan Qindai xianli de liyuan shezhi yu xingzheng gongneng 從簡牘看秦代縣里的吏員設置與行政功能.” In Liye gucheng, Qinjian yu Qin wenhua yanjiu 里耶古城秦簡與秦文化研究. Beijing: Kexue, 2009. Pp. 103113.Google Scholar
Bu, Xianqun.Li yu Qin Han guanliao xingzheng guanli 吏與秦漢官僚行政管理.” Zhongguoshi yanjiu 中國史研究 2 (1996): 4150.Google Scholar
Bu, Xianqun. Qin Han guanliao zhidu 秦漢官僚制度. Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian, 2002.Google Scholar
Bu, Xianqun.Yinwan Hanmu jiandu junli yi ‘shi sui bu’ buzheng 尹灣漢墓簡牘軍吏以‘十歲補’補證.” Jianbo yanjiu 2004 簡帛研究 2004. Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue, 2006. Pp. 234242.Google Scholar
Burrus, Virginia. Saving Shame: Martyrs, Saints, and Other Abject Subjects. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E. M. The Tyranny of Greece over Germany: A Study of the Influence Exercised by Greek Art and Poetry over the German Writers of the Eighteenth, Nineteenth, and Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Cai, Liang. Witchcraft and the Rise of the First Confucian Empire. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Douglas A. Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon, 1993.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Ernest.Social Change and Written Law in Early Chinese Legal Thought.” Law and History Review 32:1 (2014): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Ernest. Writing Chinese Laws: The Form and Function of Legal Statutes Found in the Qin Shuihudi Corpus. London: Routledge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campany, Robert Ford.Living off the Books: Fifty Ways to Dodge Ming in Early China.” In The Magnitude of Ming: Command, Allotment, and Fate in Chinese Culture. Ed. Lupke, Christopher. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2005. Pp. 129150.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. K.Honour and the Devil.” In Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society. Ed. Peristiany., J. G. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1965. Pp. 139170.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of Her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Hong 曹虹. “Cong ‘Gu shi zhi liu’ shuo kan Liang Han zhi ji fu xue de jian bian ji qi wenhua yiyi 從‘古詩之流’說看兩漢之際賦學的漸變及其文化意義.Wen xue ping lun (1991:4): 6671.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, Raimondo. Men of Respect: A Social History of the Mafia. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Chan, Shirley. The Confucian Shi, Official Service, and the Confucian Analects. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 2004.Google Scholar
Chen, Enlin 陳恩林. “Lun Gongyangzhuan fuchou sixiang de tedian ji jin gu wen fuchoushuo wenti 論公羊傳復仇思想的特點及今古文復仇說問題.” Shehui kexue zhanxian. February 1998: 137145.Google Scholar
Chen, Mengjia 陳夢家. Shang shu tong lun 尚書通論. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1994.Google Scholar
Ch’ü, T’ung-tsu. Han Social Structure. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Ch’ü, T’ung-tsu. Law and Society in Traditional China. Paris: Mouton, 1965.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alvin. “The Avenging Ghost: Moral Judgement in Chinese Historical Texts.” Ph.D. diss. University of California at Berkeley, 1971.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alvin.Avenging Ghosts and Moral Judgments in Ancient Chinese Historiography: Three Examples from Shih-chi.” In Legend, Lore and Religions in China: Essays in Honor of Wolfram Eberhard on His Seventieth Birthday. Ed. Sarah, Allan and Cohen, Alvin P.. San Francisco: Chinese Materials Center, 1979. Pp. 97–108.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alvin. Tales of Vengeful Souls: A Sixth Century Collection of Chinese Avenging Ghost Stories. Taipei: Variétés Sinologiques, 1982.Google Scholar
Cook, Scott.The Changing Role of the Minister in the Warring States: Evidence from the Yanzi Chunqiu,” in Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Ed. Yuri Pines, Paul Goldin, and Kern, Martin. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2015. Pp. 181–210.Google Scholar
Xiangdong, Cui 崔向東, Handai haozu diyuxing yanjiu 漢代豪族地域性研究. Beijing: Zhonghua, 2012.Google Scholar
Xiangdong, Cui. Handai haozu yanjiu 漢代豪族研究. Wuhan: Chongwen, 2003.Google Scholar
Declercq, Dominik. Writing Against the State: Political Rhetoric in Third & Fourth Century China. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Crespigny, Rafe. Fire over Luoyang: A History of the Later Han Dynasty, 23–220 AD. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Crespigny, Rafe. Northern Frontier: The Policies and Strategy of the Later Han Empire. Canberra: Australian National University Faculty of Asian Studies Monographs, 1984.Google Scholar
de la Durantaye, Leland. Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2000.Google Scholar
deSilva, David A. The Hope of Glory: Honor Discourse and New Testament Interpretation. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1999.Google Scholar
Du, Zhengsheng 杜正勝. Bianhu qimin: chuantong zhengzhi shehui jiegou zhi xingcheng 編戶齊民:傳統政治社會結構之形成. Taipei: Lianjing, 1990.Google Scholar
Dupont, Florence. Les monstres de Sénèque. Paris: Belin, 1995.Google Scholar
Dupont, Florence. L’orateur sans visage: Essai sur l’acteur romain et son masque. Paris: PUF, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, Stephen W. The Cloudy Mirror: Tension and Conflict in the Writings of Sima Qian. Albany: SUNY Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Durrant, Stephen, Wai-yee, Li, Nylan, Michael, and van Ess, Hans, The Letter to Ren An and Sima Qian’s Legacy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. Le concept d’empire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1980.Google Scholar
Ebrey, Patricia.The Economic and Social History of Later Han.” In The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 1: The Ch’in and Han Empires. Ed. Loewe, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Pp. 608648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process, Vol. 1: The Development of Manners: Changes in the Code of Conduct and Feeling in Early Modern Times. Tr. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Urizen Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process, Vol. 2: Power and Civility. Tr. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Pantheon, 1982.Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar von. Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (1050–250 BC): The Archeological Evidence. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archeology at UCLA, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar von.Issues in Western Zhou Studies,” Early China 18 (1993): 139226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenhausen, Lothar von.Social Ranking in Chu Tombs: The Mortuary Background of the Warring States Manuscript Finds.” Monumenta Serica 51 (2003): 439526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Liangfang 馮良方. Han fu yu jing xue 漢賦與經學. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue, 2004.Google Scholar
Fernie, Ewan. Shame in Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet I. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Fukui, Shigemasa 福井重雅. Kandai jukyō no shiteki kenkyū: jukyō no kangakuka o meguru teisetsu no saikentō 漢代儒教の史的研究:儒教の官學化おめぐる定說の再 檢討. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 2005.Google Scholar
Fukui, Shigemasa. Kandai kanri tōyō seido no kenkyū 漢代官吏登用制度の研究. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1988.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, Marc. Chateaubriand: Poésie et terreur. Paris: Fallois, 2003.Google Scholar
Gao, Min 高敏. “Qin Han de huji zhidu 秦漢的戶籍制度.” Qiu suo 求索 1 (1987): 7281.Google Scholar
Gao, Min.Shi lun Han dai li de jieji diwei he lishi yanbian 試論漢代吏的階級地位和歷史演變.” In Qin Han shi lunji 秦漢史論集. Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou Shushe, 1982. Pp. 213254.Google Scholar
Gentz, Joachim. Das Gongyang zhuan: Auslegung und Kanonisierung der Frühlings und Herbstsannalen (Chunqiu). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2001.Google Scholar
Gentz, Joachim.Long Live the King! The Ideology of Power between Ritual and Morality in the Gongyang zhuan.” In Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Ed. Yuri Pines, Paul Goldin, and Kern, Martin. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2015. Pp. 69–117.Google Scholar
Geulen, Eva, Kauffmann, Kai, and Mein, Georg, eds. Hannah Arendt und Giorgio Agamben: Parallelen, Perspektiven, Kontroversen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 2008.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. Die Intellektuellen und die Nation: Eine Deutsche Achsenzeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar
Gilmore, David D. C. Honor and Shame and the Unity of the Mediterranean. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association, 1987.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. 2nd ed. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.Google Scholar
Goldin, Paul R.Confucius and Confucianism.” In A Concise Companion to Confucius. Ed. Goldin, Paul R.. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017. Pp. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Paul R.Han Fei’s Doctrine of Self-Interest.” In After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2005. Pp. 5865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Kechang. Studies on the Han Fu. Tr. David Knechtges et al. New Haven: American Oriental Society Series #84, 1997.Google Scholar
Goodman, Howard L.Chinese Polymaths, 100–300 AD: The Tung-kuan, Taoist Dissent, and Technical Skills.” Asia Major (third series) 18:1 (2005): 101174.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C.How Much of Chuang Tzu did Chuang Tzu Write?” In his Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1986. Pp. 283–321.Google Scholar
Graham, A. C.The Nung-chia 農家 ‘School of the Tillers’ and the Origins of Peasant Utopianism in China.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42 (1970): 66100.Google Scholar
Granet, Marcel. La polygynie sororale et le sororat dans la Chine féodale: Étude sur les formes anciennes de la polygamie chinoise. Paris: Leroux, 1920.Google Scholar
Gu, Yanwu 顧炎武 (1613–1682 CE). Ri zhi lu ji shi 日知錄集釋. Si bu bai yao ed. Taipei: Zhonghua, 1965.Google Scholar
Guan, Feng 關鋒. Zhuangzi neipian yijie he pipan 莊子內篇譯解和批判. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1961.Google Scholar
Guan, Feng.Zhuangzi wai za pian chutan 莊子外雜篇初探.” In Zhuangzi zhexue taolun 莊子哲學討論. Beijing Zhonghua, 1962. Pp. 6198.Google Scholar
Habberstad, Luke. Forming the Early Chinese Court: Rituals, Spaces, Roles. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar
Hahn, Johannes. Der Philosoph und die Gesellschaft: Selbstverständnis, öffentliches Auftreten, und populäre Erwartungen in der Hohen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1989.Google Scholar
Hardy, Grant. Worlds of Bronze and Bamboo: Sima Qian’s Conquest of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Harper, Kyle. From Shame to Sin: The Christian Transformation of Sexual Morality in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, Eric A. Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Changqun 賀昌群. Lun Liang Han tudi zhanyou xingtai de fazhan 論兩漢土地占有形態的發展. Shanghai: Renmin, 1956.Google Scholar
Heather, Peter. The Restoration of Rome: Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hedrick, Charles W., Jr. History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael.Honour and Shame: Problems in the Comparative Analysis of Moral Systems.” Man 15 (1980): 339351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hihara, Toshikuni 日原利國. Shunjū Kuyōden no kenkyū 春秋公羊傳の研究. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1976.Google Scholar
Hilgers, Micha. Scham: Gesichter eines Affekts. 4th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013.Google Scholar
Hinsch, Bret. Masculinities in Chinese History. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. Bandits. Rev. ed. New York: The New Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movements in the 19th and 20th Centuries. 2nd ed. New York: Praeger, 1963.Google Scholar
Holloway, Kenneth W. The Quest for Ecstatic Morality in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Kampf um Anerkennung. Expanded ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 2003 (first edition 1994).Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.Google Scholar
Horn, Christoph. Antike Lebenskunst: Glück und Moral von Sokrates bis zu den Neuplatonikern. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1998.Google Scholar
Hou, Xudong 候旭東. Chong: Xin ren xing junchen guanxi yu Xi Han lishi de zhankai 寵:信—任型君臣關系與西漢歷史的展開. Beijing : Beijing Shifan Daxue, 2018.Google Scholar
Housset, Emmanuel. L’intelligence de la pitié: Phénomenologie de la communauté. Paris: Cerf, 2003.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Mei-yu, “Viewing the Han Empire from the Edge,” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 2011.Google Scholar
Hsing, I-tien.Qin–Han Census and Tax and Corvée Administration: Notes on Newly Discovered Materials.” In Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited. Ed. Pines, Yuri, von Falkenhausen, Lothar, Shelach, Gideon, and Robin, D. S. Yates. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. Pp. 155186.Google Scholar
Huang, Kaiguo 黃開國. Gongyang xue fazhan shi 公羊學發展史. Beijing: Renmin, 2013.Google Scholar
Huang, Liuzhu 黃劉珠. Qin Han shijin zhidu 秦漢仕進制度. Xi’an: Xibei Daxue, 1985.Google Scholar
Huang, Yingquan 黃應全. Wei Jin xuan xue yu Liu chao wen lun 魏晉玄學與六朝文論. Beijing: Shoudu Shifan Daxue, 2004.Google Scholar
Hulsewé, A. F. P. Remnants of Ch’in Law: An Annotated Translation of the Ch’in Legal and Administrative Rules of the 3rd Century B.C. Discovered in Yün-meng Prefecture, Hupei Province, in 1975. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Michael. Confucius and the Analects Revisited: New Perspectives on Composition, Dating, and Authorship. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, On 池田溫. Chūgoku kodai sekichō kenkyū: gaikan, rokubun 中國古代籍帳研 究:概觀, 錄文. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku, 1979.Google Scholar
Ikeda, Tomohisa 池田知久. Maōtai Kan bo hakusho “Gogyō hen kenkyū 馬王堆漢墓帛書五行篇研究. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 1993.Google Scholar
Jiang, Feifei 蔣非非. “Handai gongci zhidu yanjiu 漢代功次制度研究.” Zhongguo shi yanjiu 中國史研究 1 (1997): 6272.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shanguo 蔣善國. Shang shu zong shu 尚書綜述. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 1988.Google Scholar
Kaizuka, Shigeki. 貝冢茂樹. Chūgoku no kodai kokka 中國の古代國家. In Kaizuka Shigeki chosaku shū 著作集, Vol. 2. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron, 1978.Google Scholar
Kamada, Shigeo 䥥田重雄. Shin Kan seiji seido no kenkyū 秦漢政治制度の研究. Tokyo: Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai, 1962.Google Scholar
Kanaya, Osamu 金谷治. Shin Kan shisōshi kenkyū 秦漢思想史研究. 2nd rev. ed. Kyōto: Heirakuji, 1992.Google Scholar
Kang, Dawei 康達維 and Peng Xing 彭行. “Han song: lun Ban Gu ‘Dong du fu’ he tong shidai de jingdu fu 漢頌:論班固‘東都賦’和同時代的京都賦.Wen shi zhe (1990:5): 1015.Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Martin.Tropes of Music and Poetry: From Wudi (r. 141–87 BCE) to ca 100 CE.” in China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal. Ed. Nylan, Michael and Loewe, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 480491.Google Scholar
Khayutina, Maria.Die Geschichte der Irrfahrt des prinzen Chong’er und ihre Botschaft.” In Kritik in alten und modernen China. Ed. Roetz, Heiner. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2006. Pp. 2047.Google Scholar
Kinney, Anne Behnke. The Art of the Han Essay: Wang Fu’s Ch’ien-fu Lun. Tempe: Arizona State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Khayutina, Maria.Marital Alliances and Affinal Relatives (Sheng and Hun’gou) in the Society and Politics of Zhou China in the Light of Bronze Inscriptions.” Early China 37 (2014): 3999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, Anne Behnke, tr. Exemplary Women of Early China: The Lienü Zhuan of Liu Xiang. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleeman, Terry F. Celestial Masters: History and Ritual in Early Daoist Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Esther Sunkyung. Reading Sima Qian from Han to Song: The Father of History in Pre-modern China. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R.Court Culture in the Late Eastern Han: The Case of the Hongdu Gate School.” In Interpretation and Literature in Early Medieval China. Ed. Chan, Alan K. L. and Lo, Yuet-keung. Albany: SUNY Press, 2011. Pp. 940.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R. The Han Rhapsody: A Study of the Fu of Yang Hsiung (53 B.C.–A.D. 18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R.A Journey to Morality: Chang Heng’s The Rhapsody on Pondering the Mystery.” In Essays in Commemoration of the Golden Jubilee of the Fung Ping Shan Library (1932–1982). Hong Kong: Fung Ping Shan Library, 1982. Pp. 162182.Google Scholar
Knechtges, David R.Poetic Travelogue in the Han Fu.” In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Sinology. Taipei: Academia Sinica, 1989. Pp. 127152.Google Scholar
Knoblock, John, tr. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. 3 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988–1994.Google Scholar
Kollmann, Nancy Shields. By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Konstan, David. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korff, Wilhelm. Ehre, Prestige, Gewissen. Cologne: J. P. Bachem, 1966.Google Scholar
Lan, Xu 藍旭. Dong Han shi feng yu wenxue 東漢士風與文學. Beijing: Renmin Wenxue, 2004.Google Scholar
Landweer, Hilge. Scham und Macht: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Sozialität eines Gefühls. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar
Lao, Gan 勞榦. “Lun Han dai de neichao yu waichao 論漢代的內朝與外朝.” Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo jikan 歷史語言研究所集刊 13 (1948): 227267.Google Scholar
Lao, Gan.Lun Handai de youxia 論漢代的游俠.” In Lao Gan xueshu lunwen ji 勞榦學術論文集, Vol. 2. Taipei: Yiwen, 1976. Pp.10211036.Google Scholar
Lau, Ulrich and Michael, Lüdke. Exemplärische Rechtsfälle von Beginn der Han-Dynastie: Eine kommentierte Übersetzung des Zouyanshu aus Zhangjiashan/Provinz Hubei. Tokyo: University of Foreign Studies Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Lau, Ulrich and Staack, Thies. Legal Practice in the Formative Stages of the Chinese Empire: An Annotated Translation of the Exemplary Qin Criminal Cases from the Yuelu Academy Collection. Leiden: Brill, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavan, Myles, Payne, Richard E., and Weisweiler, John, eds. Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rulers, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jen-der.Conflicts and Compromise between Legal Authority and Ethical Ideas: From the Perspective of Revenge in Han Times.” Renwen ji shehui kexue jikan 1:1 (1988): 359408.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendon, J. E. Soldiers & Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity. New Haven: Yale Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. The Construction of Space in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.Emotions and Rumors in Early China.” Chūgoku shigaku 26 (2016): 124.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.The Feng and Shan Sacrifices of Emperor Wu of the Han.” In State and Court Ritual in China. Ed. McDermott, Joseph P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. The Flood Myths of Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.The Han Abolition of Universal Military Service.” In Warfare in Chinese History. Ed. Ven, Hans van de. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2000. Pp. 3376.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.Honor and Shame in Han China.” In Eurasian Empires in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Contact and Exchange between the Graeco-Roman World, Inner Asia and China. Ed. Kim, Hyun Jim, Vervaet, Frederik, and Adali, Selim Ferruh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Pp. 110132.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. “Mothers and Sons in Early Imperial China.” Extrême Orient Extrême Occident. Special issue (2012): 245275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. Review of Yuri Pines, Goldin, Paul, and Kern, Martin, eds., Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2015). In T’oung Pao, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. Sanctioned Violence in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.Swordsmanship and the Socialization of Violence in Early China.” In From Athens to Beijing: West Meets East in the Olympic Games. Ed. Brownell, Susan. New York: Greekworks.com, 2013. Pp. 153175.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mark Edward.Writings on Warfare Found in Ancient Chinese Tombs.” Sino- Platonic Papers 158. August 2005.Google Scholar
L’Haridon, Béatrice.The Historian’s Judgement and the Peers’ Judgement in the ‘Biographical Chapter on the Proscribed Party’ of the Hou Hanshu.” Monumenta Serica 67:1 (2019): 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Jianzhong 李建中 and Huaping, Gao 高華平. Xuan xue yu Wei Jin shehui 玄學與魏晉社會. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Renmin, 2003.Google Scholar
Li, Kaiyuan 李開元. Han diguo de jianli yu Liu Bang jituan: Jungong shouyi jieceng yanjiu 漢帝國的建立與劉邦集團:軍功受益階層研究. Beijing: Sanlian, 2000.Google Scholar
Li, Qing 李卿. Qin Han Wei Jin Nanbei Chao shiqi jiazu, zongzu guanxi yanjiu 秦漢魏晉南北朝時期家族, 宗族關係研究. Shanghai: Renmin, 2005.Google Scholar
Li, Wai-yee. The Readability of the Past in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Liao, Boyuan 廖伯源. “Han chu xian li zhi zhijie ji qi renming 漢初縣吏之秩階及其任命.” Shehui kexue zhanxian 社會科學戰線 3 (2003): 100107.Google Scholar
Liao, Boyuan. Jiandu yu zhidu: Yinwan Hanmu jiandu guanwenshu kaozheng 簡牘與制度:尹灣漢墓簡牘官文書考證. Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue, 2005.Google Scholar
Lin, Yutang. Lin Yutang’s Chinese–English Dictionary of Modern Usage. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Liu, Cary Y., Nylan, Michael, and Barbieri-Low, Anthony, eds. Recarving China’s Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the “Wu Family Shrines”. Princeton: Princeton University Art Museum, 2005.Google Scholar
Liu, James J. Y. The Chinese Knight Errant. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar
Liu, Pak-yuen. Les institutions politiques et la lutte pour le pouvoir au milieu de la dynastie des Han antérieurs. Paris: Collège de France, 1983.Google Scholar
Liu, Shaojun 劉韶軍. Yang Xiong yu “Tai Xuan” yanjiu 揚雄與“太玄”研究. Beijing: Renmin, 2011.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaogan. Classifying the Zhuangzi Chapters. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, 1994.Google Scholar
Liu, Xiaogan 劉笑敢. Zhuangzi zhexue ji qi yanbian 莊子哲學及其演變. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue, 1988.Google Scholar
Liu, Yongping. Origins of Chinese Law: Penal and Administrative Early Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Liu, Zehua 劉澤華. “Chunqiu Zhanguo ‘Li gong mie si’ guannian yu shehui zhenghe 春秋戰國‘立公滅私’觀念與社會整合.” In Gong si guannian yu Zhongguo shehui 公私觀念與中國社會. Ed. Zehua, Liu. Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue, 2003. Pp. 139.Google Scholar
Liu, Zehua, ed., Gong si guannian yu Zhongguo shehui 公私觀念與中國社會. Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue, 2003.Google Scholar
Liu, Zehua. Xian Qin shi ren yu shehui 先秦士人與社會. Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin, 2004.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh.Ehre und Schande in der griechischen Kultur.” Tr. H. G. Nesselrath. Antike und Abendland 33 (1987): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewe, Michael.The Orders of Aristocratic Rank of Han China.” T’oung Pao 48:1–3 (1960): 97174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewe, Michael.Social Distinctions: Groups and Privileges.” In China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal. Ed. Nylan, Michael and Loewe, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 296307.Google Scholar
, Zongli 呂宗力. Han dai de yaoyan 漢代的謠言. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Daxue, 2011.Google Scholar
Lüdke, Michael. “Professional Practice: Law in Qin and Han China.” Ph.D. diss. Heidelberg University, 2003.Google Scholar
Luo, Zongqiang 羅宗強. Xuan xue yu Wei Jin shiren xintai 玄學與魏晉士人心態. Tianjin: Nankai Daxue, 2003.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhifei 馬志飛. “Chunqiu Gongyang xue yu Handai fuchou fengqi fazheng 春秋公羊學與漢代復仇風氣發證.” Xuzhou Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) (February 1996): 2328.Google Scholar
Ma, Zonghuo 馬宗霍. Zhongguo jingxue shi 中國經學史. Rep. ed. Beijing: Shangwu, 1998 (1936).Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, Myles. Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
McTaggart, Anne. Shame and Guilt in Chaucer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John.On the Formation of the Lunyu as a Book.” Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies 44 (1996): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makeham, John.Review of The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors by E. Bruce Brooks and A. Takeo Brooks.” China Review International 6:1 (1999): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makino, Tatsumi 牧野巽. Chūgoku kazoku kenkyū 中國家族研究. Tokyo: Ochanomizu, 1980.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. La cité de l’homme. Paris: Fayard, 1994.Google Scholar
Mansvelt Beck, B. J. The Treatises of Later Han: Their Author, Sources, Contents and Place in Chinese Historiography. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne L. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750–1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masubuchi, Tatsuo 增淵龍夫. Chūgoku kodai no shakai to kokka 中國古代の社會と國家. Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1962.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne. The Moral World of the First Christians. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.Google Scholar
Miller, Harry. The Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals. New York: Palgrave, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Ichisada 宮崎市定. “Yūkyō ni tsuite 游俠につして.” In Ajia shi kenkyū アジア史研究, Vol. 1. Kyoto: Dōshōsha, 1957. Pp. 131150.Google Scholar
Mori, Mikisaburō 森三樹三郎. “Na” to “haji” no bunka: Chūgokujin to Nihonjin 名と 恥の文化:中國人と日本人. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 1971.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Neckel, Sighard. Status und Scham: Zur symbolischen Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1991.Google Scholar
Nishijima, Sadao 西嶹定生. Chūgoku kodai teikoku no keisei to kōzō – nijū tō shakusei no kenkyū 中國古代帝國の形成と構造─二十等爵制の研究. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku, 1961.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Nylan, Michael.Calligraphy, the Sacred Text and Test of Culture.” In Character and Context in Chinese Calligraphy. Ed. Liu, Cary Y., Chinge, Dora C. Y., and Smith, Judith G.. Princeton: The Art Museum, Princeton University, 1999. Pp. 1677.Google Scholar
Nylan, Michael.Toward an Archaeology of Writing: Text, Ritual, and the Culture of Public Display in the Classical Period.” In Text and Ritual in Early China. Ed. Kern, Martin. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005. Pp. 349.Google Scholar
Nylan, Michael. Yang Xiong and the Pleasures of Reading and Classical Learning in China. New Haven: American Oriental Society Series #94, 2011.Google Scholar
Ōba, Osamu 大庭脩. Kankan kenkyū 漢簡研究. Kyōto: Dōshōsha, 1992.Google Scholar
Ogata, Isamu 尾形勇. Chūgoku kodai no ie to kokka 中國古代の家と國家. Tokyo: Iwanami, 1979.Google Scholar
Owen, Stephen. The Making of Early Chinese Classical Poetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Owen, Stephen. Readings in Chinese Literary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pang, Pu 龐樸. Boshu “Wuxingpian” yanjiu 帛書五行篇研究. 2nd ed. Ji’nan: Qilu Shushe, 1988.Google Scholar
Pang, Pu.Chu du Guodian Chujian 初讀郭店楚簡.” Lishi yanjiu 歷史研究 (1998:4): 510.Google Scholar
Paster, Gail Kern. The Body Embarrassed: Drama and the Disciplines of Shame in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, R. P. Law and Morality in Ancient China: The Silk Manuscripts of Huang-Lao. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Peristiany, J. G., ed. Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1965.Google Scholar
Peristiany, J. G. and Pitt-Rivers, Julian, ed. Honor and Grace in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Peterson, Erik. Heis Theos: Epigraphische, formgeschichtliche, und religiongeschichtliche Untersuchungen zur antiken “Ein Gott”-Akklamation. Ausgewählte Schriften, Vol. 8. Würzburg: Echter, 2012.Google Scholar
Pi, Yuanzhen 皮元珍. Xuan xue yu Wei Jin wenxue 玄學與魏晉文學. Changsha: Hunan Renmin, 2004.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri.Between Merit and Pedigree: Evolution of the Concept of ‘Elevating the Worthy’ in Pre-imperial China.” In The Idea of Political Meritocracy: Confucian Politics in Contemporary Context. Ed. Bell, Daniel and Chenyang, Li. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. 161202.Google Scholar
Yuri, Pines. Ed. and trans. The Book of Lord Shang: Apologetics of State Power in Early China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri.Disputers of Abdication: Zhanguo Egalitarianism and the Sovereign’s Power.” T’oung Pao 91:4–5 (2005): 243300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pines, Yuri. Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri. Foundations of Confucian Thought: Intellectual Life in the Chunqiu Period, 722–453 B.C.E. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri.Friends or Foes: Changing Concepts of Ruler–Minister Relations and the Notion of Loyalty in Pre-imperial China.” Monumenta Serica 50 (2002): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pines, Yuri.From Historical Evolution to the End of History: Past, Present and Future from Shang Yang to the First Emperor.” In The Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Ed. Goldin, Paul R.. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. Pp. 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pines, Yuri.The Messianic Emperor: A New Look at Qin’s Place in China’s History.” In Birth of an Empire: The State of Qin Revisited. Ed. Pines, Yuri, von Falkenhausen, Lothar, Shelach, Gideon, and Robin, D. S. Yates. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. Pp. 258279.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri.Social Engineering in Early China: The Ideology of the Shangjun shu (Book of Lord Shang) Revisited.” Oriens Extremus 55 (2016): 137.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri.Submerged by Absolute Power: The Ruler’s Predicament in the Han Feizi.In Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Han Fei. Ed. Goldin, Paul R.. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. Pp. 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, Julian, The Fate of Shechem or the Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Poo, Mu-chou. In Search of Personal Welfare: A View of Ancient Chinese Religion. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Puett, Michael. To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Qian, Mu 錢穆. Liang Han jingxue jin gu wen pingyi 兩漢經學今古文平議. Hong Kong: Xin Ya Yanjiusuo, 1958.Google Scholar
Qian, Mu. Xian Qin zhuzi xinian 先秦諸子繫年. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Queen, Sarah A. From Chronicle to Canon: The Hermeneutics of the Spring and Autumn According to Tung Chung-shu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphals, Lisa. Sharing the Light: Representations of Women and Virtue in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rapp, Claudia. Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in an Age of Transition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappe, Guido. Die Scham im Kulturvergleich: Antike Konzepte moralischen Schamgefühls in Griechenland und China. Bochum: projektverlag, 2009.Google Scholar
Reddy, William M. The Invisible Code: Honor and Sentiment in Postrevolutionary France, 1814–1848. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, James M. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Richard, Naomi Noble. Rethinking Recarving: Ideals, Practices, and Problems of the “Wu Family Shrines”. Princeton: Princeton University Art Museum, 2008.Google Scholar
Roetz, Heiner. Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Roisman, Joseph. The Rhetoric of Manhood: Masculinity in the Attic Orators. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, Matthew B. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rosenwein, Barbara H. Emotional Communities in the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Roth, Harold D. The Textual History of the Huai-nan Tzu. Ann Arbor: AAS Monograph Series, 1992.Google Scholar
Roth, Harold D.Who Compiled the Zhuangzi?” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham. Ed. Rosemont, Henry Jr. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1991. Pp. 79–128.Google Scholar
Rouzer, Paul F. Articulated Ladies: Gender and the Male Community in Early Chinese Texts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Salzman, Michele Renee. The Making of a Christian Aristocracy: Social and Religious Change in the Western Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanft, Charles. Communication and Cooperation in Early Imperial China: Publicizing the Qin Dynasty. Albany: SUNY Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sanft, Charles.Dong Zhongshu’s Chunqiu jue yu Reconsidered: On the Legal Interest in Subjective States and the Privilege of Hiding Family Members’ Crimes as Developments from Earlier Practice.” Early China 33–34 (2010–2011): 141169.Google Scholar
Sanft, Charles.Law and Communication in Qin and Western Han China.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 53:5 (2010): 679711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanft, Charles.Population Records from Liye: Ideology in Practice.” In Ideology of Power and Power of Ideology in Early China. Ed. Pines, Yuri, Goldin, Paul, and Kern, Martin. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2015. Pp. 249269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanft, Charles.Rituals That Don’t Reach, Punishments That Don’t Impugn: Jia Yi on the Exclusions from Punishment and Ritual.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 125:1 (2005): 3144.Google Scholar
Satō, Kyōgen 佐藤匡玄. Ronkō no kenkyū 論衡の研究. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 1981.Google Scholar
Sato, Masayuki. The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaberg, David. A Patterned Past: Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. Emotions, the Social Bond, and Human Reality: Part/Whole Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. Goffman Unbound: A New Paradigm for Social Science. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Scheff, Thomas J. Microsociology: Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Segal, Charles. Language and Desire in Seneca’s Phaedra. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel, Anna.Geleitbrief an die Unterwelt: Jenseitsvorstellungen in den Graburkunden der späteren Han Zeit.” In Religion und Philosophie in Ostasien: Festschrift für Hans Steininger. Ed. Naundorf, Gert, Pohl, Karl-Heinz, and Schmidt, Hans-Hermann. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 1985. Pp. 161183.Google Scholar
Shaughnessy, Edward L. Sources of Western Zhou History: Inscribed Bronze Vessels. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Shun, Kwong-loi. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung: Gesamtausgabe, Band 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.Google Scholar
Sommers, Tamler. Why Honor Matters. New York: Basic Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Sterckx, Roel. The Animal and the Daemon in Early China. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Stiebert, Johanna. The Construction of Shame in the Hebrew Bible. London: Sheffield Academic, 2002.Google Scholar
Svenbro, Jesper. Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece. Tr. Janet Lloyd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tada, Kensuke 多田狷介. Kan Gi Shin shi no kenkyū 漢魏晉史の研究 Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 1999.Google Scholar
Taminiaux, Jacques. La nostalgie de la Grèce a l’aube de l’idéalisme allemand: Kant et les grecs dans l’itinéraire de Schiller, de Hölderlin et de Hegel. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967.Google Scholar
Yi-ming, Tang [Yiming]. “Voices of Wei–Jin Scholars.” Ph.D. diss. Columbia University, 1991.Google Scholar
Tang, Yiming 唐翼明. Wei Jin wenxue yu xuan xue 魏晉文學與玄學. Wuhan: Chang Jiang Wenyi, 2004.Google Scholar
Tang, Yongtong 湯用彤. “Du ‘Renwu zhi’ 讀人物志.” In Tang Yongtong xueshu lunwen ji 湯用彤學術論文集. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1983.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Hiroshi 谷口洋. “Fu ni jijo o tsukeru koto: Ryōkan no majiwari ni okeru sakusha no mezame 賦に自序おつけること:兩漢の交における作者のめざめ.” Tōhōgaku 119 (2010): 2239.Google Scholar
Tao, Xisheng 陶希聖. Bianshi yu youxia 辯士與游俠. Shanghai: Shangwu, 1933.Google Scholar
Tarnopolsky, Christina H. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato’s Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Melvin P.Marriages of the Ruling Elite in the Spring and Autumn Period.” In Marriage and Inequality in Chinese Society. Ed. Watson, Rubie S. and Ebrey, Patricia B.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. Pp. 2557.Google Scholar
Theweleit, Klaus. Male Fantasies, Vol. 1: Women, Floods, Bodies, History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Theweleit, Klaus. Male Fantasies, Vol. 2: Male Bodies: Psychoanalyzing the White Terror. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Thomas, Rosalind. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Utsunomiya, Kiyoyoshi 宇都宮清吉. Kandai shakai keizai shi kenkyū 漢代社會經濟史研究. Tokyo: Kōbundō Shobō, 1967.Google Scholar
van Auken, Newell Ann. The Commentarial Transformation of the Spring and Autumn. Albany: SUNY Press, 2016.Google Scholar
van Auken, Newell Ann.Could ‘Subtle Words’ Have Conveyed ‘Praise and Blame’? The Implications of Formal Regularity and Variation in the Chunqiu Records.” Early China 31 (2007): 47112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Auken, Newell Ann.Killings and Assassinations in the Spring and Autumn as Records of Judgments.” Asia Major 27:1 (2014): 131.Google Scholar
Vankeerberghen, Griet. The Huainanzi and Liu An’s Claim to Moral Authority. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Vankeerberghen, Griet.Texts and Authors in the Shiji.” In China’s Early Empires: A Re-appraisal. Ed. Nylan, Michael and Loewe, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Pp. 461–479.Google Scholar
Van Zoeren, Steven. Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P.Introduction.” La mort, les morts dans les sociétés anciennes. Ed. Gnoli, G. and Vernant, J.-P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Pp. 515.Google Scholar
Vervoorn, Aat. Men of the Cliffs and Caves: The Development of the Chinese Eremitic Tradition to the End of the Han Dynasty. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Vervoorn, Aat.Zhuang Zun: A Daoist Philosopher of the Late First Century B.C.” Monumenta Serica 38 (1988–1989): 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogelsang, Kai.Getting the Terms Right: Political Realism, Politics, and the State in Ancient China.” Oriens Extremus 55 (2016): 3971.Google Scholar
Vogelsang, Kai.Mit den Waffen der Frauen: Allianzen und Mésallianzen in der Chun qiu- Zeit.” In Die Frau im Alten China: Bild und Wirklichkeit. Ed. Shilling, Dennis and Kralle, Jianfei. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2001. Pp. 123.Google Scholar
Vogt, Erik.S/Citing the Camp.” In Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer. Ed. Norris, Andrew. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wang, Fuzhi 王夫之 (1619–1692). Du Tongjian lun 讀通鑒論. Taipei: Heluo, 1976.Google Scholar
Wang, Guowei 王國維 (1877–1927). Guantang jilin 觀堂集林. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1959.Google Scholar
Wang, Hsiao-po and Chang, Leo S.. The Philosophical Foundations of Han Fei’s Political Theory. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Burton, tr. The Tso Chuan: Selections from China’s Oldest Narrative History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Weigel, Sigrid. Walter Benjamin: Die Kreatur, das Heilige, die Bilder. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2008.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Hung.Private Love and Public Duty: Images of Children in Early Chinese Art.” In Chinese Views of Childhood. Ed. Kinney, Anne Behnke. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1995. Pp. 79110.Google Scholar
Wu, Hung. The Wu Liang Shrine: The Ideology of Early Chinese Pictorial Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wurmser, Léon. Scham und der böse Blick: Verstehen der negativen therapeutischen Reaktion. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Yitian 邢義田 (Hsing Yitian). “Dong Han xiaolian de shenfen beijing 東漢孝廉的身分背景.” In Di er jie Zhongguo shehui jingji shi yantaohui lunwenji 第二屆中國社會經濟史研討會論文集. Ed. Zhuoyun, Xu 許倬云 (Cho-yun Hsu), Hanguang, Mao 毛漢光, and Cuirong, Liu 劉翠溶. Taipei: Hanxue Yanjiu Ziliao ji Fuwu Zhongxin, 1983. Pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. Liang Han sixiang shi 兩漢思想史, Vols. 2– 3. Taipei: Xuesheng, 1976–1979.Google Scholar
Xu, Fuguan. Zhou Qin Han zhengzhi shehui jiegou zhi yanjiu 周秦漢政治社會結構之研究. Taipei: Xuesheng, 1974.Google Scholar
Xu, Jieling 徐傑令. Chunqiu bangjiao yanjiu 春秋邦交研究. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue, 2004.Google Scholar
Xu, Jieling.Chunqiu shiqi lianyin dui bangjiao yingxiang 春秋時期聯姻對邦交影響.” Dongbei Shida Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) (2004.1): 5662.Google Scholar
Yan, Buke 閻步克. Chaju zhidu bianqian shi gao 察舉制度變遷史稿. Beijing: Zhongguo Renmin Daxue, 2009.Google Scholar
Yan, Buke. Pin wei yu zhi wei: Qin Han Wei Jin Nanbeichao guanjie zhidu yanjiu 品位與職位:秦漢魏晉南北朝官界制度研究. Beijing: Zhonghua, 2002.Google Scholar
Yan, Buke. Shi dafu zhengzhi yan sheng shi gao 士大夫政治演生史稿. Beijing: Beijing Daxue, 1996.Google Scholar
Yan, Buke. Yue shi yu shi guan: Chuantong zhengzhi wenhua yu zhengzhi zhidu lunji 樂師與史官:傳統政治文化與政治制度論集. Beijing: Shenghuo, Dushu, Xin Zhi Sanlian, 2001.Google Scholar
Yan, Buke. Zhongguo gudai guanjie zhidu yin lun 中國古代官階制度引論. Beijing: Beijing Daxue, 2010.Google Scholar
Yan, Gengwang 嚴耕望. “Qin Han langli zhidu kao 秦漢郎吏制度考.” Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Lishi Yuyan Yanjiusuo ji kan 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 23 (1951): 89143.Google Scholar
Yang, Shuzeng 楊樹增. Han dai wenhua tese ji xingcheng 漢代文化特色及形成. Beijing: Renmin, 2008.Google Scholar
Yin, Qun 印群. Huanghe zhongxiayou diqu de Dong Zhou muzang zhidu 黃河中下游地區的東周墓葬制度. Beijing: Shehui Kexue, 2001.Google Scholar
Yin, Qun.Lun beifang zhu quyu de Chunqiu Zhanguo mu 論北方諸區域的春秋戰國墓.” In his Xian Qin kaogu tanwei 先秦考古探微. Beijing: Renmin Ribao, 2004. Pp. 109286.Google Scholar
Yoshinami, Takashi 好並隆司. Shin Kan teikoku shi kenkyū 秦漢帝國史研究. Tokyo: Miraisha, 1978.Google Scholar
Yu, Yingchun 于迎春. Handai wenren yu wenxue guannian de yanjin 漢代文人與文學觀念的演進. Beijing: Dongfang, 1997.Google Scholar
Yu, Yingchun. Qin Han shi shi 秦漢士史. Beijing: Beijing Daxue, 2000.Google Scholar
Yu, Yingshi. Shi yu zhongguo wenhua 士與中國文化. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin, 1987.Google Scholar
Yuan, Weichun 袁維春. Qin Han bei shu 秦漢碑述. Beijing: Beijing Gongyi Meishu, 1990.Google Scholar
Zha, Changguo 查昌國. Xian Qin xiao you guannian yanjiu; jian Han Song ruxue tansuo 先秦孝友觀念研究 : 兼漢宋儒學探索. Hefei: Anhui Daxue, 2006.Google Scholar
Zhang, Chunlong 張春龍. “Liye Qin jian suo jian de huji he renkou guanli 里耶秦簡所見的戶籍和人口管理.” In Liye gucheng: Qin jian yu Qin wenhua yanjiu 里耶古城:秦簡與秦文化研究. Beijing: Kexue, 2009.Google Scholar
Zhang, Hanmo. Authorship and Text-Making in Early China. Berlin: De Bruyter Mouton, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Hoquan 張鶴泉. Han Ming di yanjiu 漢明帝研究. Jilin: Jilin Wenshi, 2002.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jinguang 張金光. Qin zhi yanjiu 秦制研究. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 2004.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jinguang. Zhanguo Qin shehui jingji xingtai xintan 戰國秦社會經濟形態新探. Beijing: Shangwu, 2013.Google Scholar
Zhao, Lu. In Pursuit of the Great Peace: Han Dynasty Classicism and the Making of Early Medieval Literary Culture. Albany: SUNY Press, 2019.Google Scholar
趙沛, Zhao Pei. Liang Han zongzu yanjiu 兩漢宗族研究. Ji’nan: Shandong Daxue, 2002.Google Scholar
Zhang, Rongqiang 張榮強. Han–Tang jizhang zhidu yanjiu 漢唐籍帳制度研究. Beijing: Shangwu, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhao, Shengqun 趙生群. Chun qiu jing zhuan yanjiu 春秋經傳研究. Shanghai: Shanghai Guji, 2006.Google Scholar
Zhao, Shiyu 趙世瑜. Li yu Zhongguo chuantong shehui 吏與中國傳統社會. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Renmin, 1994.Google Scholar
Zhao, Yi 趙翼 (1727–1814). Nianer shi zha ji 廿二史劄記. Taipei: Dingwen, 1975.Google Scholar
Zhu, Shaohou 朱紹侯. Jungong juezhi kaolun 軍功爵制考論. Beijing: Shangwu, 2008.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaohai 朱曉海. Han fu shi lüe xin zheng 漢賦史略新證. Xi’an: Shaanxi Renmin, 2002.Google Scholar
Zito, Angela. Of Body and Brush: Grand Sacrifice as Text/Performance in Eighteenth- Century China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark Edward Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Honor and Shame in Early China
  • Online publication: 13 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919678.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark Edward Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Honor and Shame in Early China
  • Online publication: 13 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919678.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark Edward Lewis, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Honor and Shame in Early China
  • Online publication: 13 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108919678.009
Available formats
×