Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:53:34.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Toward a History of the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Philippe Fontaine
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Get access

Summary

We need to characterize American society of the mid-twentieth century in more psychological terms … for now the problems that concern us most border on the psychiatric.

C. Wright Mills (1951, p. 160).

The Second World War and Its Aftermath

It is hard to overestimate the significance of the Second World War for the social sciences as a whole, even though its importance varied from one social science to another. The war and its aftermath brought about profound changes in Western societies, creating new problems that provided opportunities for social scientists to demonstrate their expertise. In the postwar decades, notably the 1960s, as a result of their efforts to tackle urgent social problems, the traditional domains of the social sciences were redefined. Of course many of the conceptual frameworks or paradigms within which social scientists operated had roots that went much further back, but the changed context brought about profound transformations. The most obvious change concerned the political position of the United States in relation to Europe: to quote British historian Tony Judt (2007, p. 13), “Europe in the aftermath of the Second World War offered a prospect of utter misery and desolation. … Europeans felt hopeless, they were exhausted – and for good reason.” The physical destruction had been immense, the death toll, especially among civilians, vastly higher than that in the First World War, and at the end of the war tens of millions of people were displaced, in part as a result of “an unprecedented exercise in ethnic cleansing and population transfer” (p.24): Europe was in chaos and the split between East and West was accentuated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew and Sparrow, James T.. 2007. “Hot War, Cold War: The Structures of Sociological Action, 1940–1955.” In Calhoun, Craig, ed., Sociology in America: A History, pp. 281–313. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. and Boring, Edwin G.. 1946. “Psychology and Social Relations at Harvard University,” American Psychologist 1.4:119–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allport, Gordon W. and Hadley Cantril, A.. 1935. The Psychology of Radio. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1954. The Appeals of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Krauss, Wolfgang. 1999. “The Size and Composition of the Anti-Nazi Opposition in Germany,” PS: Political Science and Politics 32.3:562–69.Google Scholar
Amadae, Sonja M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Amadae, Sonja M. and Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1999. “The Rochester School: The Origins of Positive Political Theory,” Annual Review of Political Science 2:269–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, Jensine. 1999. “Crisis and Kuhn.” In Rossiter, M., ed., Catching Up with the Vision: Essays on the Occasion of the 75th Anniversary of the Founding of the History of Science Society, Supplement to volume 90 of Isis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Applebaum, Herbert. 1987. “Overview.” In Applebaum, H., ed., Perspectives in Cultural Anthropology. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ash, Mitchell G. 1992. “Cultural Contexts and Scientific Change in Psychology: Kurt Lewin in Iowa,” American Psychologist 47.2:198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, Mitchell G. 2003. “Psychology.” In Porter, T. M. and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe (eds). 2010. The Unsocial Social Science? Economics and Neighboring Disciplines since 1945. Annual Supplement to volume 41 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barnes, Trevor J. 2006. “Geographical Intelligence: American Geographers and Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services, 1941–1945,” Journal of Historical Geography 32.1:149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Trevor J. 2008. “Geography's Underworld: The Military-Industrial Complex, Mathematical Modelling and the Quantitative Revolution,” Geoforum 39.1:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, Allen H. 1979. “Paul Lazarsfeld and Applied Social Research: Invention of the University Applied Social Research Institute,” Social Science History 3.3/4:4–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1997. “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?PS: Political Science and Politics 30.2:166–9.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. 1963. “Introduction to the Behavioral Sciences.” In Berelson, B., ed., The Behavioral Sciences Today. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Berghann, Volker R. 2001. America and the Intellectual Cold Wars in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmer, Donald L. M. 2002. The MIT Center for International Studies: The Founding Years, 1951–1969. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1919. “Scientists as Spies.” Letter to The Nation, December 20, 1919. Reprinted in Simpson, C., ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences during the Cold War. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Bonnell, Victoria E. and Breslauer, George W.. 2003. “Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies.” Location: Global, Area, and International Archive. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4ct4x896 (Last accessed March 1, 2010).
Braudel, Fernand. 1958. “Histoire et sciences sociales: La longue durée,” Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 13.4:725–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, John D. 2004. “Imagining The Sociological Imagination: The Biographical Context of a Sociological Classic,” British Journal of Sociology 55.3:317–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britt, Steuart Henderson and Morgan, Jane D.. 1946. “Military Psychologists in World War II,” American Psychologist 1.10:423–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camic, Charles. 1989. “Structure after 50 years: The Anatomy of a Charter,” American Journal of Sociology 95.1:38–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capshew, James H. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice, and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, A. W. Bob. 2002. “The AEA and the Radical Challenge to American Social Science.” In Biddle, J. E., Davis, J. B. and Medema, S. G., eds., Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels. London: Routledge, pp. 144–58.Google Scholar
Cockett, Richard. 1995. Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983. London: Fontana Press. First published in 1994.Google Scholar
Cohen-Cole, Jamie. 2007. “Instituting the Science of Mind: Intellectual Economies and Disciplinary Exchange at Harvard's Center for Cognitive Studies,” British Journal for the History of Science 40.4:567–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Solal, Annie. 2000. “Claude L. Strauss in the United States,” Partisan Review 67.2:252–60.Google Scholar
Colander, David C. and Landreth, Harry, eds. 1996. The Coming of Keynesianism to America: Conversations with the Founders of Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Colander, David C. and Landreth, Harry, 1998. “Political Influence on the Keynesian Revolution: God, Man and Lorie Tarshis at Yale.” In Hamouda, O. F. and Price, B. B., eds., Keynesianism and the Keynesian Revolution in America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 59–72.
Converse, Philip E. 2006. “Researching Electoral Politics,” American Political Science Review 100.4:605–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutau-Bégarie, Hervé. 1989. Le Phénomène Nouvelle Histoire: Grandeur et décadence de l'école des Annales, second edition. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. 2005. Herbert Simon: The Bounds of Reason in Modern America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. 2006a. “Patrons of the Revolution: Ideals an Institutions in Postwar Behavioral Science,” Isis 97.3:420–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. 2006b. “Herbert Simon and the GSIA: Building an Interdisciplinary Community,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 42.4:311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1998. “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies During and After the Cold War.” In Simpson, C., ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. “The Behavioral Approach to Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest,” American Political Science Review 55.4:763–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Sigmund. 1992. Compromised Campus: The Collaboration of Universities with the Intelligence Community, 1945–1955. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Council, Economic and Social Research. Undated. SSRC/ESRC: The First Forty Years. Available at http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/about/esrccontext/index.aspx. Last accessed 1 March 2010.
Engerman, David. 2003. “Rethinking Cold War Universities: Some Recent Histories,” Journal of Cold War Studies 5.3:80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, David. 2007. “American Knowledge and Global Power,” Diplomatic History 31.4:599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, David. 2009. Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America's Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock Publications. Reprinted London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications. Reprinted London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion and Khurana, Ragesh. 2008. “Scientific and Merchant Professionalism in American Economics,” working document.
Friedman, Milton 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Friedman, M., ed., Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 2000. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1994. “The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision,” Critical Inquiry 21.1:228–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geiger, Roger L. 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta. 2002. Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta. 2007. Denken der Demokratie: Die Soziologie im atlantischen Transfer des Besatzungsregimes. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Geuter, Ulfried. 1992. The Professionalization of Psychology in Nazi Germany. Translated by Holmes, Richard J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Nils. 2003. Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD and London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Scott. 1991. The History and Philosophy of Social Science. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York & London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Guglielmo, Mark. 2008. “The Contribution of Economists to Military Intelligence During World War II,” Journal of Economic History 68.1:109–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 2004. Imagining the American Polity: Political Science and the Discourse of Democracy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 2000. “The Post-1945 Development of Economics in Germany.” In Bob Coats, A. W., ed., The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hammond, Debora. 2003. The Science of Synthesis: Exploring The Social Implications of General Systems Theory. Boulder, CO: The University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayter, William. 1975. “The Hayter Report and After.” Oxford Review of Education 1.2:169–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, Michael and Kanazawa, Satoshi. 1997. “Sociological Rational Choice,” Annual Review of Sociology 23:191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heims, Joshua. 1993. Constructing a Social Science for Postwar America: The Cybernetic Group, 1946–1953. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1942. “The Function of General Laws in History,” Journal of Philosophy 39.2:35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Ellen. 1995. The Romance of American Psychology: Political Culture in the Age of Experts. Berkeley / Los Angeles / London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Ellen. 1998. “Project Camelot and the Career of the Cold War Psychology.” In Simpson, C., ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Heyl, Barbara S. 1968. “The Harvard ‘Pareto Circle’,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 4.4:316–34.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 1996. Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Intellectual History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. 1997. “The Disciplines and the Identity Debates, 1970–1995,” Daedalus 126:333–51.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1964. “Bringing Men Back In,” American Sociological Review 29.5:809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hounshell, David A. 1997. “The Cold War, Rand, and the Generation of Knowledge, 1946–1962,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 27.2:237–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 1986. “French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales Paradigm,” Journal of Contemporary History 21.2:209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Joel. 2007. “The Human Sciences in Cold War America,” Historical Journal 50.3:725–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Elliott. 1998. “On Leaving The Tavistock Institute,” Human Relations 51.3:251–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardini, David R. 1996. “Out of the Blue Yonder: The RAND Corporation's Diversification into Social Welfare Research, 1946–1968,” Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Johnston, Barry V. 1995. Pitirim A. Sorokin: An Intellectual Biography. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Johnston, Barry V. 1998. “The Contemporary Crisis and the Social Relations Department at Harvard: A Case Study in Hegemony and Disintegration,” American Sociologist 29.3:26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Ron, Fairbrother, Malcolm, Hayes, David, Hoare, Tony and Jones, Kelvyn. 2008. “The Cold War and Geography's Quantitative Revolution : Some Messy Reflections on Barnes' Geographical Underworld,” Geoforum 39.6:1802–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judt, Tony. 2007. Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Katz, Barry M. 1989. Foreign Intelligence: Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services, 1942–1945. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, John L. 1997. Bringing the Market Back In: The Political Revitalization of Market Liberalism. New York: NewYork University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, Ragesh. 2007. From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krohn, Claus-Dieter. 1993. Intellectuals in Exile: Refugee Scholars and the New School for Social Research. Translated by Rita and Robert Kimber. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Herbert E. 1952. “The Appeal of Communism to American Middle Class Intellectuals and Trade Unionists,” Public Opinion Quarterly 16.3:331–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Second edition, 1970.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Edith. 1980. The Age of Structuralism: Lévi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Edith. 1986. “The Fate of Structuralism,” Theory, Culture & Society 3.3:113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahire, Bernard, ed. 2001. Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte et Syros. Originally published in 1999.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1957. “Public Opinion and the Classical Tradition,” Public Opinion Quarterly 21.1:39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1969. “An Episode in the History of Social Research: A Memoir.” In Fleming, D. and Bailyn, B., eds., The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard and Gaudet, Hazel. 1944. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Wagner Thielens, Jr. 1958. The Academic Mind: Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis. Glencoe, IL.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. 1991. “War as a ‘Simple Economic Problem’: The Rise of an Economics of Defense.” In Goodwin, Craufurd D., ed., Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction, Annual supplement to volume 23 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert J. 1992. “Creating a Context for Game Theory.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., Toward a History of Game Theory, Annual supplement to volume 24 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Kurt. 1945. “The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology,” Sociometry 8.2:126–36.CrossRef
Lipset, Seymour M. and Smelser, Neil. 1961. “Change and Controversy in Recent American Sociology,” British Journal of Sociology 12.1:41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, Richard G. 1963. An Introduction to Positive Economics. London: Weidenfeld.Google Scholar
Lodewijks, John. 1991. “Rostow, Developing Economies, and National Security Policy.” In Goodwin, Craufurd D., ed., Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction, Annual supplement to volume 23 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard. 2006. “The Influence of European Émigré Scholars on Comparative Politics, 1925–1965,” American Political Science Review 100.4:597–604.CrossRef
Longchambon, Henri. 1958. “Les Sciences sociales en France. Un bilan, un programme,” Annales. Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 13.1:94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowen, Rebecca S. 1997. Creating the Cold War University: The Transformation of Stanford. Berkeley / Los Angeles / London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, George A. 1945. “The Social Sciences in the Post-War Era,” Sociometry 8.2:137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manicas, Peter T. 1991. “The Social Science Disciplines: The American Model.” In Wagner, P., Wittrock, B. and Whitley, R., eds., Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines. Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Marrow, Alfred J. 1969. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mata, Tiago. 2009. “Migrations and Boundary Work: Harvard, Radical Economists and the Committee on Political Discrimination,” Science in Context 22.1:115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Mark A. 1971. “A Retrospective View of the Institute of Human Relations at Yale,” Cross-Cultural Research 6.3:141–72.Google Scholar
Mazon, Brigitte. 1988. Aux origines de l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales: Le rôle du mécenat américain (1920–1960). Paris: Éditions du cerf.Google Scholar
Merelman, Richard M. 2003. Pluralism at Yale: The Culture of Political Science in America. Madison, WI and London: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles A. 1926. “Progress on Political Research,” American Political Science Review 20.1:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1942. “A Note on Science and Democracy,” Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115–26.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1945. “Sociological Theory,” American Journal of Sociology 50.6:462–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, James G. 1996. “My Role in the Assessment Program of the Office of Strategic Services,” Behavioral Science 41.4:245–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, James G. (and other members of the editorial board). 1956. “Editorial: Behavioral Science, A New Journal,” Behavioral Science 1.1:1–5.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter and Nikolas, Rose. 1994. “On Therapeutic Authority: Psychoanalytical Expertise Under Advanced Liberalism.” History of the Human Sciences 7.3:29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. and Schlesinger, R. J. A.. 1949. “Editorial,” Soviet Studies 1.1:1–2.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959. Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milne, David. 2008. America's Rasputin: Walt Rostow and the Vietnam War. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1991. “When Games Grow Deadly Serious: The Military Influence on the Evolution of Game Theory.” In Goodwin, Craufurd D., ed., Economics and National Security: A History of Their Interaction, Annual supplement to volume 23 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2005. “How Positivism Made a Pact with the Postwar Social Sciences in the United States.” In Steinmetz, G., ed., The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 142–72.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2009. “Postface: Defining Neoliberalism.” In Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D., eds., The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, pp. 417–456. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkkoonen, Erich H., ed. 1994. Engaging the Past: The Uses of History across the Social Sciences. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Morawski, Jill G. 1986. “Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human relations,” Isis 77.2:219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 2003. “Economics.” In Porter, T.M and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, Laurence S. and Savchenko, Andrew, eds. 2006. Introduction to Talcott Parsons: Economic Sociologist of the 20th Century. Malden: Blackwell.
Needell, Allan A. 1993. “ ‘Truth Is Our Weapon’: Project TROY, Political Warfare, and Government-Academic Relations in the National Security State,” Diplomatic History 17.3:399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needell, Allan A. 1998. “Project Troy and the Cold War Annexation of the Social Sciences.” In Simpson, C., ed., Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War, pp. 3–38. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Lawrence T. 1998. “Social Relations Undone: Disciplinary Divergence and Departmental Politics at Harvard, 1946–1970,” American Sociologist 29.2:83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogburn, William F. and Goldenweiser, Alexander, eds. 1927. The Social Sciences and Their Interrelations. Boston / New York / Chicago / Dallas / San Francisco: The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Richard. 2005. John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics, His Economics. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Shils, Edward A., eds. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Parsons, Talcott and Vogt, Evon Z.. 1962. “Clyde Kay Maben Kluckhohn, 1905–1960,” American Anthropologist 64.1:140–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technology, Planning Committee of the Center for International Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of. 1954. “A Plan of Research in International Communication: A Report,” World Politics 6.3:358–77.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer. 1996. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer and Hoch, Paul. 1995. “The Vienna Circle in the USA and Empirical Research Methods in Sociology.” In Ash, M. G. and Söllner, A., eds., Forced Migration and Scientific Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 224–45.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy. 2003. “Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science.” In Porter, T. M. and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prewitt, Kenneth. 2005. “The Two Projects of the American Social Sciences,” Social Research 72.1:219–36.Google Scholar
Price, David H. 2008. Anthropological Intelligence: The Deployment and Neglect of American Anthropology in the Second World War. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robic, Marie-Claire. 2003. “Geography.” In Porter, T. M. and Ross, D., eds., The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7 (The Modern Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robin, Ron. 2001. The Making of the Cold War Enemy: Culture and Politics in the Military-Intellectual Complex. Princeton, NJ and Oxford. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1993. “An Historian's View of American Social Science,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 29.2:99–112.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1969. “What Is Structuralism?British Journal of Sociology 20.3:253–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallaz, Jeffrey J. and Zavisca, Jane. 2007. “Bourdieu in American Sociology, 1980–2004,” Annual Review of Sociology 33:21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Frances S. 1999. Who Paid the Piper? CIA and the Cultural Cold War. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W. 1986. No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W. ed. 2004. Cold War Triumphalism: The Misuse of History After the Fall of Communism. New York and London: The New Press.
Schulten, Susan. 2001. The Geographical Imagination in America, 1880–1950. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Selcer, Perrin. 2009. “The View from Everywhere: Disciplining Diversity in Post-World War II International Social Science,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 45.4:309–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sent, Esther-Mirjam. 1998. The Evolving Rationality of Rational Expectations: An Assessment of Thomas Sargent's Achievements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. 2005. “The Political Unconscious of Social and Cultural History, or, Confessions of a Former Quantitative Historian.” In Steinmetz, G., ed., The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Shakow, David and Rapaport, David. 1964. The Influence of Freud on American Psychology. New York: International Universities Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Skinner, Quentin, 1985. “Introduction: The Return of Grand Theory.” In Skinner, Q., ed., The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil. 2003. American Empire: Roosevelt's Geographer and the Prelude to Globalization. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Snow, Charles P. 1959. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solovey, Mark. 2001. “Project Camelot and the 1960s Epistemological Revolution: Rethinking the Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus,” Social Studies of Science 31.2:171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solovey, Mark. 2004. “Riding Natural Scientists' Coattails onto the Endless Frontier: The SSRC and the Quest for Scientific Legitimacy,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 40.4:393–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowther-Heyck, Hunter. 2009. “Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Initiative: Reconsidering the Road Not Taken,” working document.
Steinmetz, George, ed. 2005. The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Steuer, Max. 2003. The Scientific Study of Society. Boston/Dordrecht/ London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Sturrock, John, ed. 1979. Structuralism and Since: From Levi-Strauss to Derrida. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suppe, Frederick, ed. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Tribe, Keith . 2009. “Liberalism and Neoliberalism: Britain, 1930–1980.” In Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D., eds., The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trist, Eric & Murray, Hugh. 1990. “Historical Overview: The Foundation and Development of the Tavistock Institute.” In Trist, E. and Murray, H., eds., The Social Engagement of Social Science, vol. 1 (The Socio-Psychological Perspective). London: Free Association Books, pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vout, Malcolm. 1991. “Oxford and the Emergence of Political Science in England, 1945–1960.” In Wagner, P., Wittrock, B. and Whitley, R., eds., Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines. Dordrecht / Boston / London: Kluwer, pp.163–91.Google Scholar
Wagnleitner, Reinhold. 1994. Coca-Colonization and the Cold War: The Cultural Mission of the United States in Austria after the Second World War. Chapel Hill, NC and London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wallis, W. Allen. 1980. “The Statistical Research Group, 1942–1945,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 75.370:320–30.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Deborah F. 2004. “Culture at Work: Family Therapy and the Culture Concept in Post-World War II America,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 40.1:23–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1999. “How Should We Write the History of Twentieth-Century Economics?Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15.4:139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyer, Johannes. 1984. Westdeutche Soziologie 1945–1960. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Stanton. 1994. “The Commitment to Social Science: A Case Study of Organizational Innovation.” In Hammack, D. C. and Wheeler, S., Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russel Sage Foundation, 1907–1972. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 81–139.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarPubMed
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Winks, Robin W. 1964. The Cold War: From Yalta to Cuba. New York and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Worcester, Kenton W. 2001. Social Science Research Council, 1923–1998. Available at http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/1F20C6E1–565F-DE11-BD80–001CC477EC70.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×