Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:12:33.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 8 - Normal Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

“Normal” has different meanings. In the context of physical or laboratory measurements, “normal” may mean “average,” “disease-free,” or “within a given statistical range.” However, it is important to know the characteristics of the population yielding “normal” values before deciding whether these values provide an appropriate reference range with which to compare an individual test result. Many laboratories now print reference ranges on their reports and highlight test values that fall outside these values as “abnormal.” When the test subject is a pregnant woman, a fetus, or a newborn, and the reference population is composed predominantly of middle-aged men, then comparisons are patently inappropriate. It is important to understand how the physiologic changes of pregnancy affect the results of various tests and measurements before deciding whether an out-of-range result is actually abnormal.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 2087 - 2194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
Altman, DG, Chitty, LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 2934.Google Scholar
Wald, NJ, George, L, Smith, D, et al. Serum screening for Down’s syndrome between 8 and 14 weeks of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 407–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, KO, Etchegaray, A, Zhou, Y, Wright, D, Nicolaides, KH. Prospective validation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 1418.Google Scholar
Dawes, MG, Grudzinkas, JG. Patterns of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 195201.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, KM, Catalano, PM, Yaktine, AL. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should know. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21: 521–6.Google Scholar
Rosso, P. A new chart to monitor weight gain during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 41: 644–52.Google Scholar
Siega-Riz, AM, Laraia, B. The implications of maternal overweight and obesity on the course of pregnancy and birth outcomes. Maternal Child Health J 2006; 10: S153–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, S, Abrams, B, Selvin, S. The pattern of maternal weight gain in women with good pregnancy outcomes. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1984–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picciano, M. Pregnancy and lactation: physiological adjustment, nutritional requirements and the role of dietary supplements. J Nutr 2003: 133: 1997S2000S.Google Scholar
Mahendru, AA, Everett, TR, Wilkinson, IB, et al. A longitudinal study of maternal cardiovascular function from preconception to the postpartum period. J Hypertens 2014; 32: 849–56.Google Scholar
Grindheim, G, Estensen, ME, Langesaeter, E, et al. Changes in blood pressure during healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. J Hypertens 2012; 30: 342–50.Google Scholar
Spatling, L, Fallenstein, F, Huch, A, et al. The variability of cardiopulmonary adaptation to pregnancy at rest and during exercise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99 (Suppl 8): 140.Google ScholarPubMed
Clapp, JF. Maternal heart rate in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 659–60.Google Scholar
Savu, O, Jurcuţ, R, Giuşcă, S, et al. Morphological and functional adaptation of the maternal heart during pregnancy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 289–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiac structure and function in normal pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 24: 413–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducas, RA, Elliott, JE, Melnyk, SF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnancy: insights from the cardiac hemodynamic imaging and remodeling in pregnancy (CHIRP) study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014; 16: 1.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Cotton, DB, Lee, W, et al. Central hemodynamic assessment of normal term pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1439–42.Google Scholar
Auler, JOC, Torres, MLA, Cardoso, MM, et al. Clinical evaluation of the flotrac/vigileoTM system for continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for elective caesarean section: a pilot study. Clinics 2010; 65: 793–8.Google Scholar
Carruth, JE, Mirvis, SB, Brogan, DR, Wenger, NK. The electrocardiogram in normal pregnancy. Am Heart J 1981; 102: 1075–8.Google Scholar
Goloba, M, Nelson, S, Macfarlane, P. The electrocardiogram in pregnancy. Comput Cardiol 2010: 37: 693–6.Google Scholar
Asher, UA, Ben-Shlomo, I, Said, M, Nabil, H. The effects of exercise induced tachycardia on the maternal electrocardiogram. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 41–5.Google Scholar
Shivvers, SA, Wians, FH, Keffer, JH, Ramin, SM. Maternal cardiac troponin I levels during normal labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 122–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abramov, Y, Abramov, D, Abrahamov, A, Durst, R, Schenker, J. Elevation of serum creatine phosphokinase and its MB isoenzyme during normal labor and early puerperium. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 255–60.Google Scholar
Hameed, AB, Chan, K, Ghamsary, M, Elkayam, U. Longitudinal changes in the B-type natriuretic peptide levels in normal pregnancy and postpartum. Clin Cardiol 2009; 32: E60–2.Google Scholar
Yurteri-Kaplan, L, Saber, S, Zamudio, S, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide in term pregnancy. Reprod Sci 2012; 19: 520–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucius, H, Gahlenbeck, H, Kleine, HO, et al. Respiratory functions, buffer system, and electrolyte concentrations of blood during human pregnancy. Resp Physiol 1970; 9: 311–17.Google Scholar
Gazioglu, K, Kaltreider, NL, Rosen, M, Yu, PN. Pulmonary function during pregnancy in normal women and in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Thorax 1970; 25: 445–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grindheim, G, Toska, K, Estensen, ME, Rosseland, L. Changes in pulmonary function during pregnancy: a longitudinal cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 94101.Google Scholar
Lemos, A, de Souza, A, Figueiroa, J, Cabral-Filho, J, de Andrade, A. Respiratory muscle strength in pregnancy. Resp Med 2010; 104: 1638–44.Google Scholar
Morris, JK, Mutton, DE, Alberman, E. Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome. J Med Screen 2002: 9: 26.Google Scholar
Ferguson-Smith, M. Prenatal chromosome analysis and its impact on the birth incidence of chromosome disorders. Br Med Bull 1983; 39: 355–64.Google Scholar
Loane, M, Morris, JK, et al. Twenty year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21: 2733.Google Scholar
Robertson, EG, Cheyne, GA. Plasma biochemistry in relation to oedema of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1972; 79: 769–76.Google Scholar
Larsson, A, Palm, M, Hansson, LO, et al. Reference values for alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, alpha 1-antitrypsin, albumin, haptoglobin, C-reactive protein, IgA, IgG and IgM during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 1084–8.Google Scholar
Larsson, A, Palm, M, Hansson, LO, Axelsson, O. Reference values for clinical chemistry tests during normal pregnancy. BJOG 2008; 115: 874–81.Google Scholar
Rustad, P. Reference intervals for 25 of the most frequently used properties in clinical chemistry. Proposal by the Nordic Reference Interval Project (NORIP). Klinisk Biokemi i Norden 2003; 15: 1017.Google Scholar
Adeniyi, FA, Olatunbosun, DA. Origins and significance of the increased plasma alkaline phosphatase during normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 857–62.Google Scholar
Girling, JC, Dow, E, Smith, JH. Liver function tests in pre-eclampsia: Importance of comparison with a reference range derived for normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 246–50.Google Scholar
David, AL, Kotecha, M, Girling, JC. Factors influencing postnatal liver function tests. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 107: 1421–6.Google Scholar
Xydas, NP, May, JH, Henson, MC. Maternal serum amylase and lipase profiles in pregnancy: determinations in both once-sampled and multisampled patient cohorts. South Med J 1996; 89: 199203.Google Scholar
Kratz, A, Ferraro, M, Sluss, PM, Lewandrowski, KB. Laboratory reference values. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1548–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heikkinene, J, Mäentausta, O, Ylöstalo, P, Jänne, O. Changes in serum bile acid concentrations during normal pregnancy, in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and in pregnant women with itching. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88: 240–5.Google Scholar
Egan, N, Bartels, Ä, Khashan, A, et al. Reference standard for serum bile acids in pregnancy. BJOG 2012;1 19: 493–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03245.x.Google Scholar
Kiilholma, P, Gronroos, M, Liukko, P, et al. Maternal serum copper and zinc concentrations in normal and small-for-date pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1984; 18: 212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louro, MO, Cocho, JA, Tutor, JC. Assessment of copper status in pregnancy by means of determining the specific oxidase activity of ceruloplasmin. Clin Chim Acta 2001; 312: 123–7.Google Scholar
Potter, JM, Nestel, PJ. The hyperlipidemia of pregnancy in normal and complicated pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 165–70.Google Scholar
Lind, T, Godfrey, KA, Otun, H. Changes in serum uric acid concentrations during normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 128–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davison, JM, Noble, MCB. Serial changes in 24 hour creatinine clearance during normal menstrual cycles and the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981; 88: 1017.Google Scholar
Davison, JM, Dunlop, W, Ezimokhai, M. 24-hour creatinine clearance during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980; 87: 106–9.Google Scholar
Davison, JM, Dunlop, W. Renal haemodynamics and tubular function in normal human pregnancy. Kidney Int 1980; 18: 152–61.Google Scholar
Hytten, FE, Cheyne, GA. The aminoaciduria of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1972; 79: 424–32.Google Scholar
Maybury, H, Waugh, J. Proteinuria in pregnancy: just what is significant? Fetal Matern Med Rev 2005; 16: 7195.Google Scholar
Risberg, A, Larsson, A, Olsson, K, et al. Relationship between urinary albumin and albumin/creatinine ratio during normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2004; 64: 1724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lind, T, Billewicz, WZ, Brown, G. A serial study of changes occurring in the oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1973; 80: 1033–9.Google Scholar
Mills, JL, Jovanovic, L, Knopp, R, et al. Physiological reduction in fasting plasma glucose concentration in the first trimester of normal pregnancy: the Diabetes in Early Pregnancy study. Metabolism 1998: 47: 1140–4.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Scholl, TO. Ethnic differences in C-peptide/insulin/glucose dynamics in young pregnant women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 4642–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatem, M, Anthony, F, Hogston, P, Rowe, DJ, Dennis, KJ. Reference values for 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy. Br Med J 1988; 296: 676–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forest, JC, Garrido-Russo, M, LeMay, A, et al. Reference values for the oral glucose tolerance test at each trimester of pregnancy. Am J Clin Pathol 1983; 80: 828–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agardh, CD, Aberg, A, Norden, N. Glucose levels and insulin secretion during a 75 g glucose challenge test in normal pregnancy. J Intern Med 1996; 240: 303–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, AB, Baker, JR. Serum fructosamine: a screening test for diabetes in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 1027–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Connor, C, O’Shea, PM, Owens, LA, et al. Trimester-specific reference intervals for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in pregnancy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012; 50: 905–9.Google Scholar
Wang, Y, Walsh, SW, Guo, J, Zhang, J. Maternal levels of prostacyclin, thromboxane, vitamin E, and lipid peroxides throughout normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1690–4.Google Scholar
Ortega, RM, Quintas, ME, Andres, P, et al. Ascorbic acid levels in maternal milk: Differences with respect to ascorbic acid status during the third trimester of pregnancy. Br J Nutr 1998; 79: 431–7.Google Scholar
Milman, N, Bergholt, T, Byg, KE, et al. Reference intervals for haematological variables during normal pregnancy and postpartum in 434 healthy Danish women. Eur J Haematol 2007; 79: 3946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelstam, G, Lowbeer, C, Kral, G, et al. New reference values for routine blood samples and human neutrophilic lipocalin during third trimester pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2001; 61: 583–92.Google Scholar
Taylor, DJ, Lind, T. Red cell mass during and after normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 364–70.Google Scholar
Kuvin, SF, Brecher, G. Differential neutrophil counts in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1962; 266: 877–8.Google Scholar
Valdimarsson, H, Mulholland, C, Fridriksdottir, V, Coleman, DV. A longitudinal study of leucocyte blood counts and lymphocyte responses in pregnancy: a marked early increase of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio. Clin Exp Immunol 1983; 53: 437–43.Google Scholar
James, TR, Reid, HL, Mullings, AM. Are published standards for haematological indices in pregnancy applicable across populations: an evaluation in healthy pregnant Jamaican women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 811.Google Scholar
Fay, RA, Hughes, AO, Farron, NT. Platelets in pregnancy: hyperdestruction in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 238–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Boehlen, F, Hohlfeld, P, Extermann, P, et al. Platelet count at term pregnancy: a reappraisal of the threshold. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 2933.Google Scholar
Fenton, V, Saunders, K, Cavill, I. The platelet count in pregnancy. J Clin Pathol 1977; 30: 68–9.Google Scholar
Beilin, Y, Arnold, I, Hossain, S. Evaluation of the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100®) vs. the thromboelastogram (TEG) in the parturient. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 712.Google Scholar
Fenton, V, Cavill, I, Fisher, J. Iron stores in pregnancy. Br J Haematol 1977; 37: 145–9.Google Scholar
Cikot, R, Steegers-Theunissen, R, Thomas, C, et al. Longitudinal vitamin and homocysteine levels in normal pregnancy. Br J Nutr 2001; 85: 4958.Google Scholar
Milman, N, Byg, KE, Hvas, AM, et al. Erythrocyte folate, plasma folate and plasma homocysteine during normal pregnancy and postpartum: a longitudinal study comprising 404 Danish women. Eur J Haematol 2006; 76: 200–5.Google Scholar
Chanarin, I, Rothman, D, Ward, A, Perry, J. Folate status and requirement in pregnancy. Br Med J 1968; 2: 390–4.Google Scholar
Walker, MC, Smith, GN, Perkins, SL, et al. Changes in homocysteine levels during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 660–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, SD, Perkin, SL, Jodouin, CA, Walker, MA. Folate levels in pregnant women who smoke: An important gene/environment interaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 620–5.Google Scholar
Letsky, E. The haematological system. In Hyten, F, Chamberlain, G (eds), Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 3982.Google Scholar
Koebnick, C, Heins, UA, Dagnelie, PC, et al. Longitudinal concentrations of vitamin B12-binding proteins during uncomplicated pregnancy. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 928–33.Google Scholar
Clark, P, Brennand, J, Conkie, JA, et al. Activated protein C sensitivity, protein C, protein S and coagulation in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 1998; 79: 1166–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Stirling, Y, Woolf, L, North, WR, et al. Haemostasis in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 1984; 52: 176–82.Google Scholar
Bonnar, J, McNicol, GP, Douglas, AS. Fibrinolytic enzyme system and pregnancy. Br Med J 1969; 3: 387–9.Google Scholar
Cadroy, Y, Grandjean, H, Pichon, J, et al. Evaluation of six markers of haemostatic system in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 416–20.Google Scholar
Gallery, ED, Raftos, J, Gyory, AZ, Wells, JV. A prospective study of serum complement (C3 and C4) levels during normal human pregnancy: effect of the development of pregnancy-associated hypertension. Aust N Z J Med 1981; 11: 243–5.Google Scholar
Schena, FP, Alanno, C, Selvaggi, L, et al. Behaviour of immune complexes and the complement system in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. J Clin Lab Immunol 1982; 7: 21–6.Google Scholar
Jenkins, JS, Powell, RJ. C3 degradation products (C3d) in normal pregnancy. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40: 1362–3.Google Scholar
Hytten, FE, Lind, T. Volume and composition of the blood. In Diagnostic Indices in Pregnancy. Basel: Documenta Geigy, 1973, pp. 3654.Google Scholar
O’Leary, PC, Boyne, P, Atkinson, G, et al. Longitudinal study of serum thyroid hormone levels during normal pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1992; 38: 171–9.Google Scholar
Stricker, R, Echenard, M, Eberhart, R, et al. Evaluation of maternal thyroid function during pregnancy: the importance of using gestation age-specific reference intervals. Eur J Endocrinol 2007; 175: 509–14.Google Scholar
Man, EB, Reid, WA, Hellegers, AE, Jones, WS. Thyroid function in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 103: 338–47.Google Scholar
Haddow, JE, Knight, GJ, Palomaki, GE, et al. The reference range and within-person variability of thyroid stimulating hormone during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy.J Med Screen 2004; 11: 170–4.Google Scholar
Stagnaro-Green, A, Abalovich, M, Alexander, E, et al. Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 2011; 21: 145.Google Scholar
Shen, FX, Xie, ZW, Lu, SM, et al. Gestational thyroid reference intervals in antibody-negative Chinese women. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 673–5.Google Scholar
Marwaha, RK, Chopra, S, Gopalakrishnan, S, et al. Establishment of reference range for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Indian women. BJOG 2008; 115: 602–6.Google Scholar
De Leo, V, La Marca, A, Lanzetta, D, Morgante, G. Thyroid function in early pregnancy: I. Thyroid-stimulating response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Gynecol Endocrinol 1998; 12: 191–6.Google Scholar
Soldin, OP, Hilakivi-Clarke, L, Weiderpass, E, Soldin, SJ. Trimester-specific reference intervals for thyroxine and triiodothyronine in pregnancy in iodine-sufficient women using isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 349: 181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahric-Janicic, N, Soldin, SJ, Soldin, OP, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry improves the accuracy of free thyroxine measurements during pregnancy. Thyroid 2007; 17: 303–11.Google Scholar
Soldin, OP, Tractenberg, RE, Holowell, JG, et al. Trimester-specific changes in maternal thyroid hormone. Thyrotropin, and thyroglobulin concentrations during gestation: trends and associations across trimesters in iodine sufficiency. Thyroid 2004; 14: 1084–90.Google Scholar
Natrajan, PG, McGarrigle, HHG, Lawrence, DM, Lachelin, GCL. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline levels in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 1041–5.Google Scholar
Rubin, PC, Butters, L, McCabe, R, Reid, JL. Plasma catecholamines in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Clin Sci 1986; 71: 111–15.Google Scholar
Beilin, LJ, Deacon, J, Michael, CA, et al. Diurnal rhythms of blood pressure, plasma renin activity, angiotensin II and catecholamines in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. Clin Exp Hypertens B 1983; B2: 271–93.Google Scholar
Carr, BR, Parker, CR, Madden, JD, et al. Maternal plasma adrenocorticotrophin and cortisol relationships throughout human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 416–22.Google Scholar
Nolten, WE, Lindheimer, MD, Rueckert, PA, et al. Diurnal patterns and regulation of cortisol secretion in pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980; 51: 466–72.Google Scholar
Suri, D, Moran, J, Hibbard, JU, et al. Assessment of adrenal reserve in pregnancy: Defining the normal response to the adrenocorticotrophin stimulation test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 3866–72.Google Scholar
Demey-Ponsart, E, Foidart, JM, Sulon, J, Sodoyez, JC. Serum CBG, free and total cortisol and circadian patterns of adrenal function in normal pregnancy. J Steroid Biochem 1982; 16: 165–9.Google Scholar
Rees, LH, Burke, CW, Chard, T, et al. Possible placental origin of ACTH in normal human pregnancy. Nature 1975; 254: 620–2.Google Scholar
Doe, RP, Fernandez, R, Seal, US. Measurement of corticosteroid- binding globulin in man. J Clin Endocrinol 1964; 24: 1029–39.Google Scholar
Migeon, CJ, Kenny, FM, Taylor, FH. Cortisol production rate: VIII. Pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol 1968; 28: 661–6.Google Scholar
Pearson Murphy, BE, Okouneff, LM, Klein, GP, Ngo, SH. Lack of specificity of cortisol determinations in human urine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981; 53: 91–9.Google Scholar
Nolten, WE, Lindheimer, MD, Oparil, S, Ehrlich, EN. Desoxycorticosterone in normal pregnancy: I. Sequential studies of the secretory patterns of desoxycorticosterone, aldosterone, and cortisol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 414–20.Google Scholar
Garner, PR. Pituitary and adrenal disorders. In Burrow, GN, Ferris, TF (eds), Medical Complications during Pregnancy, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1995, pp. 188209.Google Scholar
Biswas, S, Rodek, CH. Plasma prolactin levels during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1976; 83: 683–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, RM, Finkelstein, JW, Kapen, S, Hellman, L. Twenty-four hour prolactin (Prl) secretory patterns during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1975; 40: 1117–20.Google Scholar
Rigg, LA, Yen, SSC. Multiphasic prolactin secretion during parturition in human subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 128: 215–18.Google Scholar
Jacobs, HS. The hypothalamus and pituitary gland. In Hytten, F, Chamberlain, G (eds), Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 345–56.Google Scholar
Pitkin, RM, Reynolds, WA, Williams, GA, Hargis, GK. Calcium metabolism in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 781–7.Google Scholar
Zhang, JY, Lucey, AJ, Horgan, R, Kenny, LC, Kiely, M. Impact of pregnancy on vitamin D status: a longitudinal study. Br J Nutr 2014; 112: 1081–7.Google Scholar
Seki, K, Makimura, N, Mitsui, C, et al. Calcium-regulating hormones and osteocalcin levels during pregnancy: A longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1248–52.Google Scholar
Biagiotti, R, Brizzi, L, Periti, E, et al. First trimester screening for Down’s syndrome using maternal serum PAPP-A and free β-HCG in combination with fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 917–20.Google Scholar
Seppala, M, Ruoslahti, E. Radioimmunoassay of maternal alpha fetoprotein during pregnancy and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 112: 208–12.Google Scholar
Haddow, JE, Palomaki, GE. Maternal protein enzyme analyses. In Reece, EA, Hobbins, JC, Mahoney, MJ, Petrie, RH (eds), Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1992, pp. 653–67.Google Scholar
Batzer, FR, Schlaff, S, Goldfarb, AF, Corson, SL. Serial β-subunit human chorionic gonadotropin doubling time as a prognosticator of pregnancy outcome in an infertile population. Fertil Steril 1981; 35: 307–11.Google Scholar
Brody, S, Carlstrom, G. Human chorionic gonadotropin pattern in serum and its relation to the sex of the fetus. J Clin Endocrinol 1965; 25: 792–7.Google Scholar
Josimovich, JB, Kosor, B, Boccella, L, et al. Placental lactogen in maternal serum as an index of fetal health. Obstet Gynecol 1970; 36: 244–50.Google Scholar
Beck, P, Parker, ML, Daughaday, WH. Radioimmunologic measurement of human placental lactogen in plasma by a double antibody method during normal and diabetic pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol 1965; 25: 1457–62.Google Scholar
Mills, MS. Ultrasonography of Early Embryonic Growth and Fetal Development. MD thesis, University of Bristol, 1992.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Kennedy, SH, Salomon, LJ, et al. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 641–8.Google Scholar
Ioannou, C, Sarris, I, Hoch, L, et al. Standardisation of crown-rump length measurement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 120 (Suppl 2): 3841.Google Scholar
Robinson, HP, Fleming, JEE. A critical evaluation of sonar crown-rump length measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702–10.Google Scholar
Pexters, A, Daemen, A, Bottomley, C, et al. New crown-rump length curve based on over 3500 pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 650–5.Google Scholar
Napolitano, R, Dhami, J, Ohuma, EO, et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 121: 556–65.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Azar, G, Byrne, D, et al. Fetal nuchal translucency: Ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ 1992; 304: 867–9.Google Scholar
Pandya, PP, Snijders, RM, Johnson, SP, et al. Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 957–62.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Brizot, ML, Snijders, RJM. Fetal nuchal translucency: Ultrasound screening for fetal trisomy in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 782–6.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384: 869–79.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 3543.Google Scholar
Ioannou, C, Talbot, K, Ohuma, E, et al. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2012: 119: 1425–39.Google Scholar
Kurmanavicius, J, Wright, EM, Royston, P, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 126–35.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 125–31.Google Scholar
Kurmanavicius, J, Wright, EM, Royston, P, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 136–43.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG, Henderson, A, Campbell, S. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 132–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Snijders, RJM, Nicolaides, KH. Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 3448.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Kemp, B, Stones, W, et al. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 719–26.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS, Altman, DG. Charts of fetal size. In Dewbury, K, Meire, H, Cosgrove, D (eds), Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1993, pp. 513–95.Google Scholar
Merz, E, Kim-Kern, MS, Pehl, S. Ultrasonic mensuration of fetal limb bones in the second and third trimesters. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15: 175–83.Google Scholar
Jeanty, P. Fetal biometry. In Fleischer, AC, Romero, R, Manning, FA, et al. (eds), The Principles and Practice of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4th edn. Norwalk, CT, Appleton & Lange, 1991, pp. 93108.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Athanassiadis, AP, Sirtori, M, Inati, M. Fetal skeletal anomalies. In Fleischer, AC, Romero, R, Manning, FA, et al. (eds), The Principles and Practice of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4th edn. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1991, pp. 277306.Google Scholar
Grannum, P, Bracken, M, Silverman, R, Hobbins, JC. Assessment of fetal kidney size in normal gestation by comparison of ratio of kidney circumference to abdominal circumference. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 249–54.Google Scholar
Mayden, KL, Tortora, M, Berkowitz, RL, et al. Orbital diameters: A new parameter for prenatal diagnosis and dating. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 289–97.Google Scholar
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the “basic examination” and the “fetal neurosonogram”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 109–16.Google Scholar
Goldstein, I, Reece, EA, Pilu, G, et al. Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1065–9.Google Scholar
Roberts, AB, Mitchell, JM, Pattison, NS. Fetal liver length in normal and isoimmunized pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 42–6.Google Scholar
Shimizu, T, Salvador, L, Allanson, J, et al. Ultrasonographic measurements of fetal ear. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 381384.Google Scholar
Birnholz, JC, Farrell, E. Fetal ear length. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 555–8.Google Scholar
Chitkara, U, Rosenberg, J, Chervenak, FA, et al. Prenatal sonographic assessment of the fetal thorax: normal values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 1069–74.Google Scholar
Ong, S, Lim, MN, Fitzmaurice, A, et al. The creation of twin centile curves for size. BJOG 2002; 109: 753–8.Google Scholar
Stirrup, OT, Khalil, A, D’Antonio, F, et al. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 301–7.Google Scholar
Reece, EA, Yarkoni, S, Abdalla, M, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of growth in twin gestations compared with growth in singleton pregnancies: I. The fetal head. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 439–43.Google Scholar
Reece, EA, Yarkoni, S, Abdalla, M, et al. A prospective longitudinal study of growth in twin gestations compared with growth in singleton pregnancies: II. The fetal limbs. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 445–50.Google Scholar
Shushan, A, Mordel, N, Zajicek, G, et al. A comparison of sonographic growth curves of triplet and twin fetuses. Am J Perinatol 1993; 10: 388–91.Google Scholar
Wilcox, M, Gardosi, J, Mongelli, M, et al. Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ 1993; 307: 588–91.Google Scholar
Yudkin, PL, Aboualfa, M, Eyre, JA, et al. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1987; 15: 4552.Google Scholar
Thompson, AM, Billewicz, WZ, Hytten, FE. The assessment of fetal growth. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1968; 75: 903–16.Google Scholar
Wilcox, MA, Johnson, IR, Maynard, PV, et al. The individualised birthweight ratio: A more logical outcome measure of pregnancy than birthweight alone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 342–7.Google Scholar
Williams, RL, Creasy, RK, Cunningham, GC, et al. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 624–32.Google Scholar
Campbell, S, Wilkin, D. Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 689–97.Google Scholar
Shepard, MJ, Richards, VA, Berkowiiz, RL, et al. An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 4754.Google Scholar
Hadlock, FP, Harrist, RB, Carpenter, RJ, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984; 150: 535–40.Google Scholar
Brace, RA, Wolf, EJ. Normal amniotic fluid volume changes throughout pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 382–8.Google Scholar
Moore, TR, Cayle, JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1168–73.Google Scholar
Fisk, NM, Ronderos-Dumit, D, Tannirandorn, Y, et al. Normal amniotic pressure throughout gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 1822.Google Scholar
Gilbert, WM, Moore, TR, Brace, RA. Amniotic fluid volume dynamics. Fetal Med Rev 1991; 3: 89104.Google Scholar
Lind, T, Parkin, FM, Cheyne, GA. Biochemical and cytological changes in liquor amnii with advancing gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1969; 76: 673–83.Google Scholar
Saddiqi, TA, Meyer, RA, Korfhagen, J, et al. A longitudinal study describing confidence limits of normal fetal cardiac, thoracic and pulmonary dimensions from 20 to 40 weeks gestation. J Ultrasound Med 1993; 12: 731–6.Google Scholar
Steed, RD, Strickland, DM, Swanson, MS, et al. Normal fetal cardiac dimensions obtained by perpendicular imaging. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 1059–61.Google Scholar
Tan, J, Silverman, NH, Hoffman, JIE, et al. Cardiac dimensions determined by cross-sectional echocardiography in the normal human fetus from 18 weeks to term. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 1459–67.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Ductus venosus velocity waveforms in appropriate and small for gestational age fetuses. Early Hum Dev 1994; 39: 1526.Google Scholar
Hecher, K, Campbell, S, Snijders, R, Nicolaides, K. Reference ranges for fetal venous and atrioventricular blood flow parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 381–90.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Arduini, D, Romanini, C. Inferior vena cava flow velocity waveforms in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1271–80.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Talone, PE, et al. Doppler indices from inferior vena cava and ductus venosus in predicting pH and oxygen tension in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growthretarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 401–10.Google Scholar
Hecher, K, Snijders, R, Campbell, S, Nicolaides, K. Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: Relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1015.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Arduini, D. Fetal cardiac function in intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 876–82.Google Scholar
Van Splunder, P, Stijnen, T, Wladimiroff, JW. Fetal atrioventricular, venous and arterial flow velocity waveforms in the small for gestational age fetus. Pediatr Res 1997; 42: 765–75.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Deter, RL, Uerpairojkit, B. Flow velocity waveforms of the ductus arteriosus in appropriate and small-for-gestational age fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24: 185–96.Google Scholar
Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Chaoui, R, et al. Blood flow velocity waveforms from peripheral pulmonary arteries in normally grown and growth-retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 8792.Google Scholar
Arduini, D, Rizzo, G. Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med 1990; 18: 165–72.Google Scholar
Kurmanavicius, J, Streicher, A, Wright, EM, et al. Reference values of fetal peak systolic blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery at 19–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17: 50–3.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Deter, RL. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 12621270.Google Scholar
Veille, JC, Hanson, R, Tatum, K. Longitudinal quantitation of middle cerebral artery blood flow in normal human fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1393–8.Google Scholar
Kurmanavicius, J, Florio, I, Wisser, J, et al. Reference resistance indices of the umbilical, fetal middle cerebral and uterine arteries at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10: 112–20.Google Scholar
Vyas, S, Nicolaides, KH, Bower, S, Campbell, S. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 797803.Google Scholar
Sherer, DM. Prenatal ultrasonographic assessment of the middle cerebral artery: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1997; 52: 444–55.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Adrignolo, A, Abuhamad, AZ, et al. Diagnosis of fetal anemia with Doppler ultrasound in the pregnancy complicated by maternal blood group immunisation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 400–5.Google Scholar
Mari, G. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 914.Google Scholar
Erskine, RLA, Ritchie, JWK. Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal and growth-retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 605–10.Google Scholar
Bahado-Singh, RO, Kovanci, E, Jeffres, A, et al. The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 750–6.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Sipes, SL, Wenstrom, K. The effect of fetal age upon normal fetal laboratory values and venous pressure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 713–18.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Heilskov, J, Pelzer, G, et al. Normal values for human umbilical venous and amniotic fluid pressures and their alteration by fetal disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 714–17.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP. Intrauterine pressure: amniotic and fetal circulation. In Ludomirski, A, Nicolini, U, Bhutani, UK (eds), Therapeutic and Diagnostic Interventions in Early Life. New York, NY: Futura, 1995.Google Scholar
Sadovsky, G, Nicolaides, KH. Reference ranges for fetal heart rate patterns in normoxaemic nonanaemic fetuses. Fetal Ther 1989; 4: 61–8.Google Scholar
Arulkumaran, S, Ingemarsson, I, Montan, S, et al. Guidelines for Interpretation of Antepartum and Intrapartum Cardiotocography. Bracknell: Hewlett Packard, 1992.Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1385–90.Google Scholar
Manning, FA, Platt, LD, Sipos, L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 787–95.Google Scholar
Manning, FA, Baskett, TF, Morrison, I, Lange, I. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: A prospective study in 1184 high-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 289–94.Google Scholar
Manning, FA. Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 45: 975–85.Google Scholar
Takagi, K, Tanaka, H, Nishijima, S, et al. Fetal blood values by percutaneous umbilical blood sampling. Fetal Ther 1989; 4: 152–60.Google Scholar
Forestier, F. Some aspects of fetal biology. Fetal Ther 1987; 2: 181–7.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP. Human fetal bilirubin levels and fetal hemolytic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1449–54.Google Scholar
Ecomomides, DL, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Metabolic and endocrine findings in appropriate and small for gestational age fetuses. J Perinat Med 1991; 19: 97105.Google Scholar
Nicolini, U, Fisk, NM, Rodeck, CH, Beacham, J. Fetal urine biochemistry: an index of renal maturation and dysfunction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 4650.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Cheng, HH, Snijders, RJM, Moniz, CF. Fetal urine biochemistry in the assessment of obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 932–7.Google Scholar
Evans, MI, Sacks, AJ, Johnson, MP, et al. Sequential invasive assessment of fetal renal function and the intrauterine treatment of fetal obstructive uropathies. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 545–50.Google Scholar
Wilkins, IA, Chitkara, U, Lynch, L, et al. The nonpredictive value of fetal urinary electrolytes: preliminary report of outcomes and correlations with pathological diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 694–8.Google Scholar
Huch, A, Huch, R, Rooth, G. Guidelines for blood sampling and measurement of pH and blood gas values in obstetrics. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1994; 54: 165–75.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Economides, DL, Soothill, PW. Blood gases, pH, and lactate in appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 9961001.Google Scholar
Soothill, PW, Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Campbell, S. Effect of gestational age on fetal and intervillous blood gas and acid-base values in human pregnancy. Fetal Ther 1986; 1: 168–75.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Thilaganathan, B, Mibashan, RS. Cordocentesis in the investigation of fetal erythropoiesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1197–200.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.Google Scholar
Davies, NP, Buggins, AGS, Snijders, RJM, et al. Blood leucocyte count in the human fetus. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 399403.Google Scholar
Abbas, A, Thilaganathan, B, Buggins, AGS, et al. Fetal plasma interferon gamma concentration in normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1414–16.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–4.Google Scholar
Thorpe-Beeston, JG, Nicolaides, KH, Felton, CV, et al. Maturation of the secretion of thyroid hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone in the fetus. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 532–6.Google Scholar
Duignan, NM, Studd, JW, Hughes, AO. Characteristics of normal labour in different racial groups. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 593601.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrapartum Care for Healthy Women and Babies. NICE Clinical Guideline CG190. London: NICE, 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG190 (accessed September 2018).Google Scholar
Ayres-de-Campos, D, Spong, CY, Chandraharan, E; FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131: 1324. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.020.Google Scholar
Eskes, TK, Jongsma, HW, Houx, PC. Percentiles for gas values in human umbilical cord blood. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1983; 14: 341–6.Google Scholar
Wiberg, N, Kallen, K, Olofsson, P. Delayed umbilical cord clamping at birth has effects on arterial and venous blood gases and lactate concentrations. BJOG 2008; 115: 697703.Google Scholar
Wiberg, N, Kallen, K, Herbst, A, et al. Lactate concentration in umbilical cord blood is gestation age-dependent: a population-based study of 17,876 newborns. BJOG 2008; 115: 704–9.Google Scholar
Westgren, M, Divon, M, Horal, M, et al. Routine measurements of umbilical artery lactate levels in the prediction of perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1416–22.Google Scholar
Mercelina-Roumans, P, Breukers, R, Ubachs, J, Van Wersch, J. Hematological variables in cord blood of neonates of smoking and nonsmoking mothers. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 449–54.Google Scholar
Paterakis, GS, Lykopoulou, L, Papassotiriou, J, et al. Flow-cytometric analysis of reticulocytes in normal cord blood. Acta Haematol 1993; 90: 182–5.Google Scholar
Walka, MM, Sonntag, J, Kage, A, et al. Complete blood counts from umbilical cords of healthy term newborns by two automated cytometers. Acta Haematol 1998; 100: 167–73.Google Scholar
Perkins, SL, Livesey, JF, Belcher, J. Reference intervals for 21 clinical chemistry analytes in arterial and venous cord blood. Clin Chem 1993; 39: 1041–4.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×